The Royals Should Be Buyers, Sort Of

Winning a championship is great — for about 48 hours or however long it takes for the parade to end. Then the page turns to the next season and it’s time to figure out how to win all over again. The Kansas City Royals just won their first championship in 30 seasons less than a year ago, but right now, it’s not enough. If the 2015 championship is the only one they win with this current core of players, they’ll eventually be able to look back with fondness on the achievement. Now isn’t the time for reflection, however: it’s the time to make every effort to add even more glory to this era of Royals baseball.

Unfortunately, the Royals haven’t put themselves in a strong position to contend in 2016. They’re at an even .500 record despite a negative-33 run differential and currently sit nine games behind first-place Cleveland. Our playoff odds currently give them just a 1-in-50 chance of making it to the divisional series. If they “buy” over the next week and a half, it stands to reason they can increase their odds slightly, but they face an unavoidably great uphill climb. In order to claim a wild-card spot, they’ll have to leapfrog five other teams.

It’s certainly possible that they can pull off a surprise run in the second half – the Royals have made an impressive habit of foiling projections in recent years, after all — but if I were the one calling the shots in Kansas City, I’d find it irresponsible to make moves focused solely on 2016 success.

Note how I phrased that, though: I didn’t say that I wouldn’t be a “buyer” this month, only that I wouldn’t focus on 2016.

There’s a maddening and inaccurate oversimplification which inevitably occurs each July that there are two groups of teams: those trying to win now and those who should sell off all players without long-term value. The Royals shouldn’t be buying for 2016, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be “buyers” in the current trade market.

One could make a well-reasoned argument that they should be selling hard right now. They have a plethora of valuable players – Lorenzo Cain, Eric Hosmer, Wade Davis, the injured Mike Moustakas — in position to become free agents after the 2017 season. There are plenty of precedents for breaking up a core while there’s still time to exchange them for prospects — the Braves’ recent sale of Jason Heyward, Craig Kimbrel, and Justin Upton representing the most recent example. However, I found the strategy to be ill-conceived when the Braves employed it and I’d find it to be even more ill-conceived for this Royals team.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Developing successful roster cores is the primary goal in team-building, and it’s exceedingly rare for it to come together as well as this Royals group has over the past two seasons. This isn’t a group on the verge of aging and falling apart, but instead a successful group that has the potential for at least one final run. If the Royals are still .500 and flailing a year from now, I’d advise them to cash in their chips. Their chief objective right now, however, should be doing everything they can to make sure that doesn’t happen. Which leads to a question: what can the team do right now to improve their chances of winning in 2017 (and beyond)?

Their roster is not without obvious holes. Although Whit Merrifield has delighted at times this season, he’s also shown that second base continues to be a weakness for the team. They could also stand to upgrade their right-field situation and will need to find a new way to use the designated-hitter role once Kendrys Morales moves on after this season. By and large, though, these are complementary roles that need reinforcements – the core of the lineup is secure. The area which requires the most attention is their rotation.

As it currently stands, Kansas City’s rotation for 2017 looks something like this: Yordano Ventura, Danny Duffy, Ian Kennedy, maybe Jason Vargas?, and a spot to be filled by Chris Young? a prospect like Alec Mills? or the perpetually injured Kyle Zimmer? That’s an untenable situation which will need to be addressed in the offseason. As you may have heard, though, the starting-pitching market will be exceptionally weak this winter. As a result, the Royals should be in the market right now for starting pitchers with multiple years of team control remaining.

It makes little-to-no sense for the team to bring in rental starters like Rich Hill, Jeremy Hellickson, or Andrew Cashner, but there are a few starters who could be available in the next week and a half who should be of interest to the Royals, including: Jake Odorizzi, Matt Moore, Chris Archer, Julio Teheran, Sonny Gray, Ervin Santana, and Michael Pineda. Let’s run down the list in roughly the reverse order of desirability.

Santana is 33 years old and owed $27 million over the next two seasons. His upside is non-existent but he does provide value as a back-of-the-rotation innings eater and did have some success with the Royals when he was with them in 2013, for whatever that’s worth.  Also, as a result of his contract status and age, the asking price for Santana will likely be the lowest among this group of pitchers.

Pineda will be a free agent after the 2017 season and has struggled mightily throughout his career with injuries and inconsistent performance. However, he’s just 27 years old and has shown flashes of brilliance. His Achilles’ heel on the mound has been home runs and it’s tempting to suppose that moving away from Yankee Stadium to the spacious confines of Kauffman Field could provide a huge boost to his ability to consistently be effective.

Another pitcher who has struggled significantly this season is Sonny Gray. He’s just 26 and has three remaining seasons of team control, but I’d be extremely wary of pursuing a pitcher whose value has dropped so precipitously this season. No one knows Gray better than the Athletics, so if they’re opting to sell this low on him, it’d be pertinent to wonder why.

The Braves keep saying Teheran is unavailable. Maybe he is and maybe he isn’t. Jeff Sullivan recently made the case that the Braves should trade him, but the asking price will be sky-high for good reason — he’s 25 and won’t be a free agent until after the 2020 season. The Royals’ top prospect, shortstop Raul Mondesi, is a poor match for a system which already has Dansby Swanson and Ozzie Albies in the upper minors and it’s hard to imagine anyone from the next tier of prospects getting this trade done. This is probably a non-starter.

Which finally brings us to the Rays’ trio: Archer, Moore, and Odorizzi. They are 27, 27, and 26, respectively, and all under contract through the 2019 season. Moore’s contract contains the added bonus of consisting entirely of club options over the next three seasons, so the team would be able to move on at any time if necessary. Could the Royals and Rays be lined up for another prospect-for-starting-pitcher swap?

The Royals have made it a habit to load their pitching staff with fly-ball pitchers due to their massive outfield and the stellar defenders who patrol it. As home-run rates rise across the league, this plan is becoming increasingly risky, but the stadium considerations still may give them justifiable cause to value fly-ball pitchers like Moore or Odorizzi in such a manner which increases the likelihood that there’s a match. Additionally, Archer’s tremendous success a year ago may justifiably set his price tag well above that of his two teammates. Any of the Rays’ three could be a viable trade target for the Royals, but Moore and Odorizzi stand out as the two strongest matches.

Winning is hard. The Royals have done it once and now they face the unenviable task of trying to find a way to repeat. It’s exceedingly unlikely to happen this year, but they’re in a position to begin preparing for a final push with their championship core. Actively scouring the market for non-rental players is the best play for the team in advance of the August 1st trade deadline.





Corinne Landrey writes for FanGraphs and MLB.com's Cut4 site. Follow her on Twitter @crashlandrey.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BritishCub
10 years ago

Good stuff as always Corrine! the buying for the future approach seemed to work well for the rangers last year after all. I see one last stat spiting run in them yet 😛

pedeysRSox
10 years ago

Pineda looks interesting, might help more than young could.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago
Reply to  pedeysRSox

Yeah if I was going to go after one of the guys listed Pineda would probably be the one. The combination of potential upside and price seems about right.

Even if he doesnt improve and can just stay healthy he would probably be the Royals best starter. Although that probably says more about the Royals rotation than anything.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago

With the all buzz around guys like Chapman and Miller, and the deals we saw made for Kimbrel and Giles, is it crazy to suggest the Royals should be actively shopping Wade Davis?

ShauncoreMember since 2019
10 years ago

Not crazy at all. A lot of noise has been made in KC about the rise of Herrera this year, and sort of implying that he’s the new Davis in a negative connotation that Davis isn’t as good anymore.

Davis though still has a stellar ERA of 1.17 with a still good FIP of 2.63 (his strikeouts are way down). Meanwhile he had that brief injury scare with his forearm that seems to have been nothing (according to the Royals).

Relievers are a lot of “what have you done for me lately?” and Davis hasn’t quite been as good as he was in 2014/2015 but he’s still gotta be one of the 5-10 best relievers in baseball while only costing you $10M next year ($4M cheaper than Kimbrel and $1M more than Miller).

*Note that Herrera has been very good and may be thew new Davis since he currently has a 1.69 ERA, 1.86 FIP, 11.39 K/9, and 1.48 BB/9. It would behoove KC to at least shop Herrera as well. He doesn’t have the “proven close tag” (who cares) but he won’t be a free agent until after the 2018 season.

*Double note – it’s been argued that Dayton Moore has missed the boat twice already to trade a good reliever in Soria and Holland previously.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

I guess the question is, can the Royals compete in 2017? If you think they can then Davis and Herrera are probably pieces you hang onto because presumably they would be valuable next year and move other ones to try and bolster the roster.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
10 years ago

Personally I don’t see the 2017 being better on paper necessarily (I know.. The game isn’t played on paper blah blah). They lose a couple semi-key guys that although not super talented, do create a legitimate hole. Volquez, Hochevar, and Morales means KC has to find a new #2-3 pitcher (rotation wise not talent wise), a new 7th inning guy (who could be a 8th inning reliever on many teams), and a DH.

The projections were certainly down on this team compared to 2015 results and I’m not sure at this point we can see the 2017 team being markedly (10+ wins) better even with a full season of Mike Moustakas (the biggest injury/missing piece).

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Morales has basically been replacement level this year so not sure how much losing him really hurts. Volquez and Hochevar are legit losses though.

Also Gordon missed ~6 weeks with a broken wrist (same collision that took out Moustakas) and still doesnt look quite right while Cain has been on the DL since late June. Those are arguably their two most valuable players. Combine that with Moustakas and you have 3 of probably their 4 most valuable players missing for a good chunk of the first half. I dont know many teams that would look good under those circumstances.

I dont necessarily disagree with you about 2017 but I dont think its as obvious as you make it seem either.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
10 years ago

Yeah Morales is only a DH in position, not value/worth. That was my point really.

Gordon missed a lot of time last year too and before his injury this year had a 78 wRC+. Since coming back he’s at a 72 wRC+. Last year with his injury he saw a steep drop off in production too and he’ll be a year older. I think the days of 5-6 win Gordon are done of course, but wouldn’t be surprised of anything from a 1-3 win Gordon over a full season.

I believe the Royals were at .500 when Moustakas went on the DL so they weren’t thriving with him really. Cain you definitely miss but he’s missed 20-30 games each year with injuries to his legs.

The 2017 team, even with all those players, need significant improvements to the pitching staff, a 2B, DH, and SS. That’s a lot of pieces to find in a hurry this summer/winter.

Double Oaked
10 years ago

I’m a little confused by the idea that the Royals should be buyers at this point in the season. If the idea to compete in 2017, wouldn’t it make sense to wait until the off season to trade when prices will be lower?

This is assuming the front office doesn’t mind spending big to also have a shot at being a dark horse team this year as well.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago
Reply to  Double Oaked

I think what the author is saying is that the Royals should be buyers but not in the traditional “Trade Deadline” rent-a-player sense.

The Royals should try and improve to increase their chances for the rest of this season but not with the same short-sighted, all-in mentality of other teams in better positions. The idea for the Royals is to improve this season AND compete next season. To use examples from last year, The Royals should be pursuing Troy Tulowitzki type trades, not David Price type trades.

Sure they could wait until the off season but that doesn’t help them for the rest of this season.

isavage
10 years ago
Reply to  Double Oaked

But some of the guys that might benefit the Royals will already have moved to other teams by the off season if the Royals were to stand pat. The supply of available players will almost certainly have shrunk.

KCDaveInLA
10 years ago

I think Odorizzi would be a terrific addition (or re-addition), but understandably from the Rays’ perspective, it would be tough figuring out what to ask in return. Thanks for the article.

Matt
10 years ago

I think the Royals are in a weird spot where they could do half buy, half sell. As weak as the relief pitching market is this summer, they could very easily sell off a Wade Davis to a contending team. Luke Hochevar might be another name they could throw out there since he’s taken a huge step up in the pen. With Herrera back there, it isn’t like they take a hit at closer.

If they still wanted to compete this year, they could go get like a Melvin Upton, take on maybe half his remaining contract and get him without giving up much of a prospect. Or if they wanted an expiring contract, a Josh Reddick, Carlos Beltran or Jay Bruce (assuming they decline the option) type.

Doubt they do it, but it’s a weird market this year so I could see them taking advantage and selling off some relievers while still going to get low cost assets to see if they can make a run at the AL Wild Card.

John
10 years ago

The Royals have done it once and now they face the unenviable task of trying to find a way to repeat.”

I’d say trying to find a way to repeat a championship is one of the most enviable tasks in sports.