This Doesn’t Look Like the Red Sox’s Year
On Sunday night, in their 114th contest of the season, the Red Sox lost their 55th game. Normally, this might escape notice — 16 teams beat them to that particular punch — but last year, the Sox didn’t lose their 55th game until October 6 (Game 2 of the AL Division Series against the Yankees), that after storming to 108-54 record during the regular season. They would lose just three postseason games, one in each round, en route to their fourth championship of the millennium. This year’s Red Sox do not appear destined to increase that total.
Sunday’s loss was the Red Sox’s eighth in a row, all within the AL East; after taking the first three games of a four-game set from the Yankees at Fenway Park from July 25-27, they lost the series finale, then three straight at home to the Rays before being swept in a four-game series in the Bronx, which knocked them to 14.5 games behind their New York rivals. The skid — which ended with Monday’s 7-5 win over the Royals — was the team’s longest since July 2015; no Sox team of the past three seasons lost more than four straight, and last year’s powerhouse never lost more than three straight.
As a result of the slide, Boston’s playoff odds have dropped precipitously:

Through July 27, the Red Sox were 59-47, eight games back in the AL East (the closest they’d been since June 25) and tied with the A’s for the second AL Wild Card spot. Their playoff odds stood at 64.6%, with a 6.5% chance to win the division and a 58.0% chance of retaining a Wild Card spot; their odds of winning the World Series stood at 6.2%, higher than every team except the Astros (23.6%), Dodgers (18.8%), Yankees (15.7%), and Twins (7.3%). After Sunday, their odds were down to 15.9%, with just a 0.2% shot at the division, and just a 1.4% chance at winning the World Series, lower than 10 other teams. With Monday’s win, which isn’t reflected in the above graph, they’re back to 20.7%, but no closer to the division lead; it’s Wild Card or bust.
Boston’s odds hadn’t been far below 50% this year until the streak. On July 21, when they reached their previous low point at 47.2%, they rallied by winning five out of six against the same Rays and Yankees. They were at 50.4% through July 30, their last game before the trade deadline, but despite clear needs in the bullpen and the rotation, and enough lineup shortcomings to make my Replacement Level Killers lists at first base, second base, and designated hitter, they stood pat. Their only trade in the entire month of July was the acquisition of Andrew Cashner from the Orioles for Elio Prado and Noelberth Romero, a pair of Venezuela-born 17-year-olds currently playing in the Dominican Summer League.
Cashner was lit up during the eight-game streak, just like the rest of the Red Sox starters, including two former Cy Young winners (David Price and Rick Porcello) and a pitcher who spent the better part of the past two seasons contending for the award before injuries and late-season fades (Chris Sale). In fact, the Red Sox didn’t get a single quality start in those eight games. Five times, the starter’s runs allowed exceeded his innings pitched, a disaster start:
| Date | Pitcher | Opp | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7/28/19 | Chris Sale | Yankees | 5.1 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 7/30/19 | David Price | Rays | 4 .1 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| 7/31/19 | Rick Porcello | Rays | 5.2 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 8/1/19 | Andrew Cashner | Rays | 5.2 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| 8/2/19 | Eduardo Rodriguez | Yankees | 6.2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| 08/03/19 (1) | Chris Sale | Yankees | 3.2 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 08/03/19 (2) | Brian Johnson | Yankees | 3.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 8/4/19 | David Price | Yankees | 2.2 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Total | 37 | 61 | 45 | 44 | 13 | 19 | 41 | ||
| Average | 4.63 | 10.70 | 3.16 | 4.62 | 9.97 |
For that streak, the rotation’s ERA was a ghastly 10.70, their FIP a not-so-convenient 7.11. From July 1 through Sunday, the unit posted a 6.23 ERA and 5.43 FIP, both third-worst in the AL; by comparison, the Yankees’ rotation, which was raked over the coals in the month of July, has a 5.83 ERA and 5.73 FIP.
Though its relative ranking is camouflaged by the mediocrity of the rest of the AL, this year’s rotation has taken a significant step back:
| Unit | ERA | Rk | ERA- | Rk | FIP | Rk | FIP- | Rk | WAR | Rk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Rotation | 3.77 | 4 | 84 | 3 | 3.88 | 4 | 91 | 4 | 14.2 | 4 |
| 2019 Rotation | 5.07 | 5 | 105 | 8 | 4.35 | 5 | 96 | 6 | 11.8* | 8 |
The rotation’s adjusted ERA is 21 percent higher relative to the league, though their FIP is only five percent higher. The difference has much to do with the defense, but a home run rate that’s jumped from 1.16 per nine to 1.47 hasn’t helped, nor has the slight decline in innings per start (from 5.37 to 5.22), which has exposed a bullpen that’s somewhat shakier.
I’ll get to both the defense and the bullpen momentarily, but it’s worth pointing out the precipitous individual drops that make up that rotation. Sale, who pitched to a sterling 2.11 ERA and 1.98 FIP last year, owns a 4.68 ERA and 3.33 FIP; while his strikeout and walk numbers are still great (34.6% and 6.3%), his home run rate has more than doubled, from 0.63 to 1.49 per nine, and his BABIP has jumped from .283 to .319. Porcello, continuing the up-and-down pattern that has defined his stay with the Red Sox, has slipped from a 4.28 ERA and 4.01 FIP to a 5.54 ERA and 4.83 FIP, including Monday night’s streak-stopping effort. His strikeout rate has plummeted (from 23.5% to 18.2%) while his BABIP has jumped by 25 points (from .285 to .310), and his home run rate is up as well. Price, hit hard in Sunday’s abbreviated start after returning from paternity leave, has seen his ERA rise from last year’s 3.58 to 4.36, though his FIP has dropped, from 4.02 to 3.64, the result of a slightly improved strikeout rate while his walk and homer rates have remained static; even so, his BABIP has jumped from .274 to .338.
Rodriguez’s numbers have fallen off as well (from 3.82 ERA and 3.65 FIP to 4.19 and 4.28, respectively), but the bigger drop has been from the team’s fifth starters and injury fill-ins. Where last year Brian Johnson (13 starts), Nathan Eovaldi and Drew Pomeranz (11 starts apiece), and four other pitchers combined for a 4.65 ERA and 4.69 FIP in 222.2 innings, this year’s bunch — Hector Velazquez (eight starts), Eovaldi, and Cashner (four starts apiece) and four other starters — has been torched for a 6.73 ERA and 5.38 FIP. Where last year’s team went 27-22 in games not started by the front four, this year’s squad is just 12-13, and the only reason they’re not worse is that a good number of those starts have been bullpen- or opener-type games; those starters have averaged around four innings and three runs allowed per turn.
The bullpen, about which I’ve written volumes and have little to add that wasn’t said before — blah blah Craig Kimbrel and Joe Kelly, blah blah Matt Barnes and Ryan Brasier — has taken a downturn as well:
| Unit | ERA | Rk | ERA- | Rk | FIP | Rk | FIP- | Rk | WAR | Rk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Bullpen | 3.72 | 4 | 83 | 4 | 3.85 | 3 | 92 | 3 | 3.9 | 8 |
| 2019 Bullpen | 4.46 | 9 | 93 | 7 | 4.18 | 7 | 92 | 7 | 4.5* | 7 |
Eovaldi, whom president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski and manager Alex Cora anointed the closer just before the All-Star break, while he was still rehabbing his way back from arthroscopic surgery to remove loose bodies in his right elbow, has been wobbly since returning, allowing six runs while striking out nine in 5.2 innings spread out over six appearances; he has yet to pitch in a save situation. Brasier, who leads the team with seven saves, is currently trying to find himself at Triple-A Pawtucket.
The staff’s decline has been abetted by the Red Sox defense, as you may have ascertained given the many rising BABIPs and ERA/FIP discrepancies above. Where last year’s unit was fifth in the league with a .693 defensive efficiency, three points above league average, this year’s squad is dead last at .668, 21 points below average. By Baseball Prospectus’ Park Adjusted Defensive Efficiency they’ve fallen from ninth (-0.3%) to last (-4.04%). They’ve actually improved in terms of DRS (from 12th at -26 to ninth at -11) but fallen in terms of UZR (from sixth at 25.3 to ninth at 5.1), though I’ll note both that the latter doesn’t account for shifts, and that the team’s .313 BABIP and .311 wOBA in such situations were both league worsts through Sunday. DRS is particularly down on the left side of the infield, with Xander Bogaerts a major league-worst 17 runs below average at shortstop and Rafael Devers three below average at third base; the recently released Eduardo Núñez was a combined seven below average at third base, second base, and shortstop.
After the trade deadline passed without the Red Sox adding any help, Dombrowski more or less waved a white flag on the AL East race, saying, “If we were closer to first place, I would have been more open-minded… Realistically, we’re probably playing first for a wild-card spot. I look at that a little differently as far as what you’re trying to do and the risks you’re willing to take.”
The reality is that he was hamstrung both by the team’s payroll and the farm system’s lack of depth. The team’s $236.2 million Opening Day payroll was already the majors’ highest, and for competitive balance tax purposes, it’s at $241.3 million, $35.3 million over the threshold. As second-time offenders who are more than $20 million over the threshold, their bill for this year already comes to $12.4 million. That’s only slightly more than the $11 million they’re paying outfielder Rusney Castillo to languish in the minors, but had they added enough payroll to clear the threshold by $40 million, they would have paid an even steeper surtax and had their top pick in next year’s draft bumped down by 10 spots. As it is, by paying the tax this year, they’ll face a 50% marginal rate for the overage if they exceed next year’s $208 million threshold, with additional surtaxes for going $20 million or $40 million over.
Meanwhile, their farm system ranks last in the majors by our rankings as well as those of MLB Pipeline (Baseball America has them 22nd). They have just one prospect who grades out above a 45 Future Value, 2018 first-round pick Triston Casas, a 19-year-old first baseman now in A-ball who ranks 106th on our list. The system’s overall valuation of $97 million is $20 million less than the 29th-ranked team, the Nationals. While not insurmountable, those two situations limited Dombrowski, who was apparently unwilling to give up Casas, Triple-A third baseman Bobby Dalbec (45 FV, fifth on the team’s list), or rookie infielder Michael Chavis in a deal for Mets closer Edwin Díaz, which would have opened up one hole while helping to close another.
The Red Sox weren’t alone in failing to make an impact move; neither the Yankees nor the Cardinals landed any much-needed rotation help, and the Dodgers, whose own bullpen has been shaky, merely added a sinkerballing lefty reliever few had heard of (the Rays’ Adam Kolarek). Cora put a brave face on the non-activity, saying in part, “I’m not disappointed. This is a team, a group that we trust. I’ve been saying all along that the group has to get better.”
They’ll have to, even to claim a Wild Card spot. The good news is that they have a comparatively soft schedule the rest of the way, with a combined winning percentage of just .487, and they face the Yankees and Rays just four more times apiece; they’ve gone 4-11 and 6-9 against the pair en route to a 28-31 intradivisional record. The bad news is that there’s no cavalry coming to save them. This is who the 2019 Red Sox are, for better or worse.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
“The good news is that they have a comparatively soft schedule the rest of the way, with a combined winning percentage of just .487, and they face the Yankees and Rays just four more times apiece;”
The problem is that it works both ways. They’re 5.5 games behind the Rays for the second Wild Card spot. And the Rays also have an easy schedule the rest of the way, with only 4 games against the Red Sox and two against the Yankees (all in Tampa). In fact, they’d probably be better off if they had more games left against the Rays since it would give them more opportunities to make up that ground.
Of course, there’s also Cleveland (7.5 games ahead of Boston), Oakland (5 games ahead) and Texas (0.5 game behind) to contend with. Baseball Reference only gives them a 6.8% chance of making the playoffs. If we average that with the 20.7% from Fangraphs, that puts their chances at 13,8%. Which seems about right.
BTW, here is the remaining strength of schedule for the other 4 teams in the Wild Card hunt:
Rays: .481
Indians .499
A’s .494
Rangers: .507
So they have an easier schedule than the Rangers. But they’re 5+ games behind 3 teams that have schedules just as easy as theirs. Really hard to see how they make up that ground against 2 of those 3 teams. And making matters worse, all of their remaining head-to.head games (4 against Tampa, 3 against Cleveland) are on the road.
Just remembered that Baseball Prospectus also calculates playoff odds. They have the Red Sox at 7.7%. Fangraphs sure seems like an outlier here…
I agree with you here. Fangraphs playoff odds seem very slow to move, even when a team is obviously very much worse than the projections show. The ROS win percentage is 3rd best in the MLB behind the Astros and Dodgers. I get strength of schedule, but, they are nowhere near the 3rd best team in the MLB.
Edit: Ha, I didn’t see someone below basically wrote the exact same thing as me before me.
I think a big part of things is that they still think Chris Sale is going to be good going forward. When there are absolutely no indications of that at all(and normally in his career he gets much worse in August and especially September)
Slow to move but also subject to wild fluctuations. e,g, a 5% change in a single day 110+ games into the season.
I’ve been wondering if they changed the formulae this year. I’ve felt like there have been a lot of these big moves this year where in the past I always felt FG’s projections had the slowest reaction.
Could just be my memory though.
“better off if they had more games left against the Rays since it would give them more opportunities to make up that ground.”
Given that they’ve shown almost no ability to beat good teams, that seems doubtful. If they play enough bad teams, maybe they can steal a wild card game and then cross their fingers for about one month of pitching resurrection in October. And I say this as a Red Sox fan. They’re not done, but they so far have shown no evidence of strong competition. The team makeup reminds me of some of the 2000’s aging Yankees teams, with lots of FA dollars and great enough hitting to make playoffs, but shaky pitching and a weak farm that prevented going deep.
We’re nearing the point where the focus shifts to Mookie Betts and his desire to reach free agency.
Can the Red Sox risk losing him for a non-premium draft pick?
If a single win can up their playoff expectancy percentage by 5 points, it makes me question the methodology behind the calculation.
I think it was the Boston win combined with Tampa and Oakland both losing.
So maybe it’s a good thing that the Red Sox didn’t do this, but I always found the moves they did this offseason to be a little weird. They had a whole bunch of guys who were going to be free agents or could have been free agents this offseason, and so it actually probably made more sense to see if you could sign guys whose markets were tepid like Kimbrel and Keuchel to one-year deals (or heck, trade for some rentals like Tanner Roark) and not sign Chris Sale to a huge extension or re-sign Eovaldi to a huge deal, and then they could have tried to dip below the tax line next year.
The only big argument against this strategy, as I see it, is that they would have been resetting the tax in Mookie Betts’ walk year and in theory you don’t want to waste that or give him any reason to walk (since he and Boegarts are the two guys you want to keep long-term alongside Devers and Benintendi). But since they seem to allergic to that top tax bracket it’s also not all that likely they are going to go for signing Betts to a mega contract where they’re paying Sale, Price, Eovaldi, and Boegarts a combined $100M in that first offseason…and that’s before we know if Martinez is opting in to his $19M deal that year. I mean, pick your battles; 2019 is worth fighting for, but 2020 was always going to be tough if going over the top bracket isn’t an option, and at least that way you reset the tax for a year before you offer Mookie a $30-40M/year contract.
Boston is in an interesting place now as Sale’s extension and arbitration raises will eat up the savings from dropping Porcello’s contract, making it difficult to add impact pieces this offseason.
What would Mookie Betts’ trade value be for one season as an Arb 3?
The FanGraphs odds for the Red Sox include projecting them from here on out as the third best team in baseball (behind only the Astros and Dodgers) with a winning percentage of 0.586. It also includes projecting their rivals for the wildcard as significantly worse teams with projected winning percentages for competition as follows: Indians=0.549, Rays=0.549, A’s=0.524.
The Red Sox certainly are not the third best team in baseball this year. To believe the stated playoff odds for the Red Sox you also have to believe that the Red Sox really are a much better team than the Indians, Rays, and A’s. I suspect their real playoff odds are significantly less than 20%.
Not sure where you’re looking but I’m seeing them with a projected.600 winning percentage the rest of the way, second behind only Houston. Either way, that’s….ummmm…strange.
https://www.fangraphs.com/standings/playoff-odds
I’m looking here: https://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=Standings
I think the difference between the two projections that FanGraphs reports is that the one I reported considers their winning percentage against neutral opponents, and the one you reported considers their actual remaining schedule. Either way, the FanGraphs projections really seem to like the Red Sox despite their poor performance in the standings thus far.
Part of their poor performance in the (AL East) standings is the Yankees being an extreme outlier in terms of outperforming their BaseRuns. By BaseRuns so far this season the Red Sox would be 1.5 games back of the Yankees, and both a good amount behind the Rays. And the Red Sox only fell behind the Yankees during this past weekend sweep. Not a great underlying performance this year, but about top 10 in baseball.
Jay’s article is all doom and gloom, which fits with this moment (lost 8 in a row to NY and Tampa) and their actual playoff odds. But this is still one of the best lineups in baseball with a rotation and bullpen that has put up a 96 and 92 FIP- respectively.
Perhaps it has been a lot of bad luck. Do you expect it will change going forward?
It feels like the Rays always massively underperform their BaseRuns, this happens nearly every season.
One thing I find surprising is the stark difference between how the Red Sox hit lhp vs rhp. This year, they are up to 100 wRC+ (113 vs Rhp), which is buoyed by a recent hot streak against lhp as they were in the low 90s a few weeks ago. Last year they were at 92 wRC+ (116 rhp). Those are pretty large differences over two seasons, and guys like Jd, Betts, even Benitendi hit LHP better. Maybe it is just noise. But, odd to say the least.
My user name gives insight into my minor bias here, but I think it’s wholly reasonable to think Boston is much better, by true talent, than Cleveland, TB, or Oakland. They have some serious holes on the right side of the infield and the bullpen, but there are very few teams who can compete with their headline talent. They have four MVP- or near-MVP-caliber hitters and at least one guy who should be a Cy Young-caliber starter, along with three other starters who should be well above average.
It’s really a question of if you think the pitching is really as atrocious as it has been lately. If Sale, Price, and Porcello show up at 75% of what they should be doing, this is still a really good team.
I think on the offensive side Boston is certainly much better, but on the pitching side both Cleveland and Tampa Bay are much better than Boston. Boston has bled runs all year and they will struggle to win consistently until that improves. Is there reason to believe it will improve?
Nothing other than hoping for a return to form from Sale and Price (and, to a lesser extent, Porcello, although this probably isn’t far off what he really is). I don’t see a great reason to think that WON’T happen. It will be too little, too late. But in a vacuum, Boston’s rotation ought to stack up against Cleveland and Tampa.
The bullpen is an unmitigated nightmare, I’ve got nothing there.
You have to consider the pitching as a whole though because they feed in to each other. If you don’t trust your bullpen you ask for more outs from your starters, and starters get less effective the more batters they face.
The Yankees have won every game that they have not used a starting pitcher at all this year. That is 10 wins just from the bullpen.
but what reasonable hope is there with Sale? His 2 worst months in his career are August and September. His HR/9 rate as a starter in September is over DOUBLE his April-July rates. Against good teams this year, he’s been awful. And his next few starts after the Angels- Indians, Phillies, and @ Rockies. Not exactly a recipe for success.
You’re probably right. I just have trouble understanding how he got this bad this quickly. He started the year bad, and then a month ago he looked great. Maybe this is just how he ages — the windows of dominance get shorter and shorter and are sandwiched between ever more explosive blow-ups.
For what it’s worth, Price has always been very up-and-down but has finished the season strong more often than not.
still think with Sale something is wrong with him physically. I mean his start on Saturday at the same rate that he was throwing it in April(at least 5% lower than any other point). Going into the start he was throwing fast ball on the season 46.8% of the time. 93.1 mph. Saturday he only threw it 35.5% at 92.8 MPH.
It should be obvious now, if for any reason it was not clear before this season, that the Sox are out of the loop of modern organizational approaches to finding, developing, and keeping talent. There are at minimum five small or middle market organizations who are superior at that game, and two behemoths. The Sox have to figure out how to join that club and the first hurdle is not to fire the old managers, which is simple enough, but to know who to hire. That’s the Catch-22 in business. The owners and managers who have demonstrated they don’t know what they are doing are not the ones to discover how to do it. And on we go.
It’s pretty hard to tell because so much of what is currently there is from the current regime, who did pretty well with stockpiling talent. Also, they traded some guys to win a world series, which seems like it was fair. There are good reasons to second-guess the “trade everyone on the farm to win now” approach, although they did win now.
That’s before we talk about the guys like Durran and Casas who look pretty good, and Flores, who unexpectedly passed away. The Red Sox probably aren’t on the cutting edge but I’m totally convinced this is evidence of that.
All anyone needs to know is that the METS, that’s right the laughing stock METS, now have a 5X better chance of getting to the playoffs.
How am I’m supposed to believe Devers and Bogaerts are having atrocious defensive years when their UZR and dWAR are both positive, and decently so?
In my opinion, the heavy regression in pitching is by far to blame for their middling success thus far. Mookie and JD’s offensive regressions have been buoyed by Devers’ and Bogaerts’ career years at the plate. Lineup is otherwise basically the same – no injuries (unless Moreland would be called major; Pearce wouldn’t have sustained his success this year), nobody hitting an age plateau.
As a dyed-in-the-wool Red Sox fan who seldom misses a pitch I feel like I can throw an opinion out that sees it from a fan’s eye. First let me, and most of Red Sox Nation, make the point that this is 99% the fault of the starting pitching with small amounts of other condiments thrown in. This season brings to mind the famous quote by Harry Neale, a well-known NHL coach. When asked how important goal-tending was he replied, “It’s 75% of the game except when you don’t have any, then it’s 100%”. In baseball I have always heard that pitching was 80% of the game and that momentum is the next day’s starting pitcher. These cliches are important and describe the Red Sox 2019 season very well. When anybody tries to cover up how awful Sale has been this year with some gobbledy-gook about K’s and BB’s and FIP it is clear that this is some misguided attempt to disguise what the eyes have been seeing all season. An almost 150% increase in balls leaving the yard is incredibly bad. Game 4 of the Yankee series in Fenway was, without question, the key moment in the Red Sox collapse. The Sox had won 3 straight and 5 of 6 and Sale went out and tossed in another stinker. Assuming competence, when you perform is as important as how you perform. Is the ensuing 8 game losing streak any surprise, of course not. The Red Sox players can deny it all they want but they knew the season ended that night. Is it baffling that Sale can still strike out so many yet get pounded around so often, yes, but that doesn’t change the fact that he is the #1 cause of the Red Sox troubles. Aces have to be aces, not the last part of the horse to go over the jump, because that permeates down the entire rotation. Next on the list of culprits is Mr. Batting Practice, Rick Porcello. From June 29th through July 31st he made 6 starts and gave up 32 earned runs on 48 hits in 28.2 innings yet had a 4-1 record. The fact that he has a 10-8 record with a 5.54 ERA gives the sabermetricians all the ammunition they need when arguing that wins are not a true measure of pitching quality just like FIP cannot hide Sale’s terrible year. The Red Sox are not the Orioles and it is shocking to see this kind of performance on the mound. To add to the Sox woes, Price who was doing the job until the All-Star break, suddenly stopped getting anybody out culminating in Sunday’s cataclysm. Eovaldi’s loss was devastating for if anyone can identify a fifth starter please report him to missing persons. Only Rodriquez carried the load in July. There are other things that have failed to perform as expected but the starting pitching shoulders the blame.
Sale is so funny. Almost every single game he starts off really well. But then…
look at the times thru the order-
1st- .171/.251/.299 .551 OPS
2nd- .319/.376/.600 .976 OPS
3rd- .195/.250/.367 .617 OPS
or by pitch
1-25 .175/.248/.289 .537 OPS 3 hr allowed
26-50 .236/.317/.431 .747 OPS 6 HR allowed
51-75 .299/.351/.584 .935 OPS 9 hr allowed
76-100 .222/.274/.398 .672 OPS 3 hr allowed
101+ .091/.167/.227 .394 OPS 1 HR allowed
those are just some really strange splits.
This is interesting. I wonder how much of it is he only makes it to the third time around (and higher pitch counts) on days when he’s pitching well
It’s really been a mixture. He’s faced at least 18 batters all 23 starts this year. His starts between 19-27 batters- everything under the sun just about. 6 of his 12 starts with over 24 batters faced have not been quality starts. But then all 3 of his 24 batters faced starts were good ones.
I do not think the Sox cared if it was their year. They acted in the off season like last year’s world series was enough. They let two key relievers go -without replacements. They didn’t address clear weakness/questions at catcher, first and second base. Let it ride with JBJ, Porcello and Eovaldi.
A little regression from Martinez and Betts and the thought must have been we are probably still good. Clearly this is not the case.
It seems inconceivable that a team would be so smug as to think that they could just throw their gloves on the field and get to the playoffs but that looks like what happened. Spring training was a disaster. The Red Sox certainly tested the belief that spring training is too long and players can get ready in a much shorter period of time. Well, the Red Sox proved that it isn’t that easy. Every starting pitcher was limited in his innings and starts and the first 19 games were pathetic. I have to defend the relief pitching situation for it appears that few people outside of New England understand that Kimbrel simply was not an option. He made absurd demands and was beginning to show some slippage. Kelly was erratic, to be kind, and Sox fans did not miss him at a 3 years for $25M. Bullpens are bullpens, who should they have signed, the completely washed up Cody Allen was mentioned, pardon me if I pass on him, Edwin Diaz has proven like so many before him to be a one year wonder, another pass thank you. Most in Red Sox Nation trusted Barnes and Brasier and they failed to come close to last year. Eovaldi seemed like the right choice but injuries happen. It is next to impossible to blame Dombrowski for resigning Steve Pearce either. He looked like a perfect platoon partner for Moreland but he also was injured. Vasquez has filled the hole at catcher, who could have predicted 17 HR’s. The best way to sum it up is that last year everything went right, almost like it was pre-ordained, right up to and including Benintendi’s catch or Moreland’s pinch HR while this year every ball has just eluded Bradley’s glove on found the hole with men on 2nd and 3rd and 2 outs. I can live with 2004, 2007, 2013 and last year’s special team without too much disappointment for this season.
More importantly,do the Red Sox give Mookie,a 350,for 10 next year.
Petey is no longer a force.
The Yankees win,even with a battered line up.
What happens when the bombers get healthy?
All questions for the Red Sox Nation……