Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Fells Archer
If the 2020 season does happen — and right now, that’s an open question — it will be without Chris Archer. The Pirates announced on Wednesday that the 31-year-old righty underwent surgery to correct for thoracic outlet syndrome, ruling him out for whatever transpires this season, and perhaps ending his time in Pittsburgh given his contract situation. Given the track record of pitchers who have undergone the procedure, we can only hope that this doesn’t mark the end of the two-time All-Star’s run as an effective pitcher.
As I’ve written before, thoracic outlet syndrome is caused by a compression of the nerves and/or blood vessels somewhere between the neck and the armpit. Symptoms commonly include numbness or tingling in the fingers and hands, or fatigue or weakness that doesn’t go away with physical therapy and rest. Pitchers tend to be particularly vulnerable to TOS because of their repetitive overhand movements and the way their arm muscles build up. The condition is generally remedied by the removal of a cervical rib and two small scalene muscles.
Archer, whom the Pirates acquired from the Rays on July 31, 2018 in exchange for outfielder Austin Meadows and pitchers Tyler Glasnow and Shane Baz (the latter as a player to be named later) — a steal of a deal for Tampa Bay, the way things have gone — endured the worst season of his eight-year career in 2019. Though he struck out a respectable 27.2% of hitters faced, his walk and home run rates jumped significantly from their 2018 levels, the former from 7.7% to 10.5%, the latter from 1.15 per nine to 1.88. Both of those were career highs, as were his 5.19 ERA and 5.02 FIP, which were respectively 20% and 13% worse than league average. Per Pitch Info, his average four-seam fastball velocity fell a full tick from 2018 (95.3 mph to 94.3 mph) and was down 1.5 mph relative to ’17 and 1.9 mph relative to ’15.
Amid that grim litany, Archer actually pitched significantly better after the All-Star break than before:
| Split | IP | HR/9 | K% | BB% | K-BB% | EV | xwOBA | ERA | FIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Half | 78.2 | 2.29 | 25.3% | 11.8% | 13.5% | 88.7 | .383 | 5.49 | 5.92 |
| 2nd Half | 41.0 | 1.10 | 30.9% | 7.9% | 23.0% | 86.7 | .277 | 4.61 | 3.29 |
Unfortunately, his renaissance was cut short due to injuries. Having already served 18 days for right thumb inflammation in late April and early May, he left his August 20 start after one inning due to right shoulder inflammation. Though he began rehabbing towards a return, he was shut down for the season in mid-September. After the season, the Pirates picked up his $9 million option and termed him “healthy and full systems go” as of mid-December, but he was scratched from his first scheduled spring start on February 24 due to neck discomfort. He made his spring debut on March 6 with four strikeouts in a pair of scoreless innings against the Blue Jays, but didn’t get to pitch again before the COVID-19 shutdown.
In a conference call with reporters on Wednesday, general manager Ben Cherington and director of sports medicine Todd Tomczyk noted that Archer had indicated further neck discomfort before the closure of camp but remained on a monitored throwing program after the closure. He experienced some symptoms common to pitchers who experience thoracic outlet syndrome but not all of them, and not immediately after throwing; sometimes, it was hours or days later. Via MLB.com’s Adam Berry:
“What is consistent with TOS is the inconsistencies, so that’s what makes it sometimes challenging to make a clear-cut diagnosis,” Tomczyk said. “But Chris is and was very diligent with marking down what he felt, when he felt it, to help himself and help us and the physicians really pin down the correct diagnosis so we could help him move forward.”
Doctors determined that his throwing shoulder and elbow were structurally sound, Tomczyk said, and experts initially ruled out the possibility that he had thoracic outlet syndrome. However, Tomczyk noted that it can take time for doctors to definitively diagnosis the syndrome; reliever Nick Burdi visited multiple doctors before having a similar surgery last year, for instance.
Archer won’t be able to pitch this year, leaving the Pirates to decide on how to handle his $11 million option for 2021; the buyout is $250,000. For the tight-fisted franchise whose estimated 2020 payroll is only $61 million, that seems like a long shot, even given his upside. “We won’t have games to evaluate, but there will be other information that we have at that time that we don’t have now. So we’ll just want to take all the time we have,” said Cherington.
Complicating matters for the Pirates and Archer is the sad fact that unlike Tommy John surgery, the range of outcomes is quite wide when it comes to pitchers who have undergone surgery to correct TOS, and there aren’t a ton of success stories. Updating the data I pulled together for my May 2018 piece on Phil Hughes:
| Pitcher | Yr surgery | Age | Pre | ERA- | FIP- | Post | ERA- | FIP- | ERA- dif | FIP- dif |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Burdi* | 2019 | 26 | 10.0 | 256 | 83 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Drew VerHagen* | 2016 | 25 | 50.1 | 103 | 111 | 148.2 | 120 | 107 | 17 | -4 |
| Alex Cobb* | 2011 | 23 | 52.2 | 88 | 91 | 812.0 | 95 | 98 | 7 | 7 |
| Nate Adcock | 2014 | 26 | 95.0 | 91 | 109 | 28.0 | 138 | 153 | 47 | 44 |
| Mike Foltynewicz* | 2015 | 23 | 105.1 | 146 | 133 | 577.1 | 94 | 99 | -52 | -34 |
| John Rheinecker | 2008 | 28 | 121.0 | 120 | 108 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Matt Harrison | 2009 | 24 | 147.0 | 125 | 114 | 521.1 | 87 | 98 | -38 | -16 |
| Carter Capps | 2017 | 26 | 147.2 | 110 | 82 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Nick Tepesch* | 2015 | 25 | 219.0 | 111 | 118 | 19.2 | 150 | 192 | 39 | 74 |
| Aaron Cook | 2004 | 25 | 256.1 | 105 | 102 | 1150.0 | 92 | 99 | -13 | -3 |
| Daniel Bard | 2014 | 29 | 257.1 | 85 | 97 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Vince Velasquez* | 2017 | 26 | 258.2 | 107 | 100 | 264.0 | 116 | 101 | 9 | 1 |
| Nate Karns* | 2017 | 29 | 310.2 | 109 | 108 | 5.1 | 0 | 75 | -109 | -33 |
| Mike Adams | 2012 | 34 | 363.2 | 56 | 71 | 43.2 | 95 | 111 | 39 | 40 |
| Matt Harvey* | 2016 | 27 | 519.2 | 79 | 72 | 307.1 | 142 | 128 | 63 | 56 |
| Jaime García | 2014 | 28 | 594.2 | 92 | 89 | 540.1 | 102 | 100 | 8 | 11 |
| Noah Lowry | 2009 | 28 | 618.1 | 92 | 102 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Tyson Ross* | 2016 | 29 | 670.2 | 98 | 89 | 234 | 122 | 118 | 24 | 29 |
| Clayton Richard* | 2014 | 30 | 773.1 | 114 | 113 | 511.1 | 117 | 107 | 3 | -6 |
| Chris Young | 2013 | 34 | 890.2 | 92 | 101 | 348.1 | 107 | 135 | 15 | 34 |
| Luke Hochevar | 2016 | 32 | 929.1 | 117 | 104 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Kip Wells | 2006 | 28 | 983.2 | 100 | 104 | 354.2 | 132 | 116 | 32 | 12 |
| Jeremy Bonderman | 2008 | 25 | 994.2 | 107 | 93 | 236.1 | 139 | 127 | 32 | 34 |
| Shaun Marcum | 2013 | 31 | 995.0 | 94 | 100 | 35.0 | 132 | 143 | 38 | 43 |
| Phil Hughes | 2016 | 30 | 1204.2 | 106 | 98 | 86.1 | 142 | 137 | 36 | 39 |
| Chris Archer* | 2020 | 31 | 1235.0 | 96 | 90 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Josh Beckett | 2013 | 33 | 1935.1 | 91 | 89 | 115.2 | 83 | 119 | -8 | 30 |
| Kenny Rogers | 2001 | 36 | 2049.1 | 92 | 95 | 1253.1 | 94 | 101 | 2 | 6 |
| Chris Carpenter | 2012 | 37 | 2207.1 | 86 | 88 | 17.0 | 96 | 106 | 10 | 18 |
Pitchers ranked by pre-surgery innings totals. Negative ERA-/FIP- differentials indicate improvement with respect to park-adjusted league average
I’ve made the table sortable, so you can see how things shake out in a variety of ways. It’s worth noting that Archer is in the oldest quartile here, and is fourth in pre-surgical innings; the three pitchers ahead of him ranged from 17 post-surgical innings to 1,253.1, which isn’t much help in terms of forecasting. More helpful was sorting the pitchers into three buckets based on the age at which they had the surgery:
| Age | # | Pre IP | ERA- | FIP- | Post IP | ERA- | FIP- | ERA- dif | FIP- dif | NR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-26 | 11 | 212 | 110 | 100 | 376 | 99 | 102 | -10 | 1 | 18% |
| 27-30 | 8 | 509 | 95 | 95 | 180 | 120 | 113 | 30 | 21 | 38% |
| 31-older | 9 | 1261 | 95 | 95 | 268 | 102 | 110 | 8 | 15 | 11% |
The youngest group of pitchers fared the best afterwards, throwing more post-surgical innings than pre-surgical ones, and seeing some improvement in performance. The oldest bunch, the group of which Archer will be part, saw some decline, but the group in the middle was a wasteland even apart from the fact that three of its eight pitchers never made it back to the majors. Nearly half the innings of that cohort belong to Harvey and Wells, both of whom served as piñatas for major league hitters following surgery. Their outsized effect on that group should serve as a reminder that these are small sample sizes, and so an extreme performance here or there can skew the numbers. On that note, if I remove Rogers from the oldest group simply to note the effect his success has on the overall numbers, the innings averages drop to 1,162 pre-surgery and 144 post-surgery; while the ERA- and FIP- for the former remain the same, those for the latter jump to 112 and 120 — roughly as (in)effective as the middle group.
Admittedly, this is a pretty crude analysis that’s only boiling things down to run prevention and its components. It may well be more instructive to look more closely at things like pre-surgical velocity and spin rate, at least for the more recent pitchers who have that data, but that comes at the expense of sample size. It’s possible that Archer’s ability to throw in the mid-90s increases his chances of a successful return compared to a pitcher like Hughes, whose velo was in the low 90s when he went under the knife. Maybe it’s significant that Archer was pitching well just prior to being sidelined, rather than enduring a grim slog towards the injured list. Perhaps the variations in type of TOS — neurogenic (roughly three-quarters of cases, including Archer’s), venous, or arterial — are significant when it comes to post-surgical outlook, though we simply don’t have classifications for most of the pitchers above. There’s a lot we don’t know, however, and so we can only hope that the comeback of a pitcher who once rated among the game’s most promising goes well.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Kind of feels like the end for him. It’s going to take a ton of time for him to rehab, the surgery outcomes are not optimistic, and he was already having trouble finding consistency.
Probably the end of returning to ace-status, but I suspect that Ray Searage was responsible for 80% or more of his struggles in Pittsburgh (it’s no coincidence that Archer’s K/9 dropped immediately upon getting to Pittsburgh while Morton, Cole, and Glasnow are improved immediately). Even looking at the chart, if he suffers the expected drop in performance, assuming most of his pre-injury problems were because Searage was again trying to stick a round peg in a square hole, he could be an average MLB pitcher for a little while longer. He’s a great athlete which should help him in his recovery and maybe help him get some velo back if he uses his legs more in his delivery.
I was a Pirate fan for almost 50 years…
Stuck with them through the cocaine scandal of the 1980s, and the 2 decade stretch of futility.
But the awful decisions the past few years…
Trading Cole for Joe Musgrove and let’s face it, nothing else. Cole was not on the verge of free agency. (But I went with it, figuring it was the start of a rebuild)
Trading Meadows, Glasnow and Baz for Archer. (So I guess we are trading top prospects for current value suddenly, months after trading Cole.)
NOT trading Felipe Vasquez at the trade deadline – this was the final straw. It should have been clear the wheels were off, and Vasquez was our best tradable asset. I assumed Vasquez would just get injured before the Bucs could trade him… but the Pirates found a way to make it even worse.
I threw away all Pirates hats and jerseys the day Vasquez was arrested. And I chose to root for the Red Sox.
It is easier than it might seem to change allegiances. I don’t see it as me being a bad fan. The Pirates treated us fans so poorly that they chose to drive us away.
F the Pirates.
Them not trading Felipe Vasquez at the trade deadline has always made me wonder if baseball insiders had heard some whispers of the investigation.
I feel your pain. Different sport but I grew up a Phoenix Suns fan and just had to quit the team about 10 years ago when it became obvious that the owner was a meddling idiot. You can be one or the other as an owner and be successful, but not both.
I could understand trading Cole. They were looking to rebuild! I could understand the Archer trade. They made a mistake, but they were looking to compete! But, I can’t understand how any sane organization with anything resembling a plan could make those moves a mere six months apart. Nothing real changed between the two trades. It made no sense.
You do realize they fired the front office in charge of all of that?
Too little, too late. The ownership that allowed such incompetence and penny pinching did not change.
When a relationship goes that bad… saying “but I have changed! It will be different this time!” does not fix things. The relationship is over.
Feel your pain as a former Reds fan. There was a string of “rebuilding” moves or cost cutting moves that hardened me to the point where I just couldn’t take anymore ineptitude out of the front office (Bowden and Jocketty stand out as the worst). Getting zilch for Chapman, Cueto, Leake and Frazier was finally too much.
That and the clown show 6 ERA journeyman bullpens they were throwing out a few years ago. Uff da.
I don’t blame you one bit. The way that ownership shits on the fans and runs the franchise like it’s a dollar general…..it’s sad to see from a neutral viewpoint.
IMO, more fans should be like you. Why invest time, money, and energy on a crappy organization that consistently puts out a crappy product and treats it’s customers with borderline contempt? The only way these crappy owners learn or just go away is when they get hit in the wallet.
Man, what a bad draw for Chris Archer. Seriously glad that he signed an extension early enough in his career that he should be financially well. Just another reminder of why these guys should secure every cent they can…they never know when it could all just go poof!
From my perspective as a Pirate fan: what a steaming pile of poop of a trade. It’s almost unbelievable how badly botched most key moments have been in Pirates history since 1992. Crazy how hopeless it’s felt rooting for this team most of my life.
Archer had an impressive career going. It is a shame he will likely be remembered as the broken, declining guy who was part of an extremely lopsided trade.
Rays fans should LOVE Archer. He pitched well for them for several years, and then brought them Meadows, Baz, and Glasnow.
Pirate fans… not so much to love about Archer’s impact on the Bucs.
Based on what I’ve seen / heard, he could be remembered as one of EPSN’s or MLB TV’s best baseball analysts who once had a kind of checkered career as a player. Of course, he might not want to do that full time since he should be set for life anyway.
Agreed. I’ve always liked him as a TV analyst.
He’s my favorite Rays player ever, such a joy to watch on the mound, but also in the dugout! Agreed that he will make a fantastic analyst with the comment below.
” Seriously glad that he signed an extension early enough in his career that he should be financially well.”
While in hindsight it did work out OK for him, I get that he would have ended up in about the same place as of the end of 2019, had he just gotten arbitration ($20-25M).
The Pirates did pick up the $9M 2020 option despite his poor 2019 season, but I suspect he’d have needed to show some improvement to get the $11M for 2021.
Had he been a FA, last November, would he have done better then 1/$9M with a $11M option…? Given what Keuchel got (again looking at an fWAR POV), it seems pretty likely.
Granted in an ERA focused view, these two comps aren’t quite as good choices, but when in Rome, right?
Unfortunate, I wanted to see how he could fare coming off his good second half of 2019 and new pitching coaches in Pittsburgh. Hopefully he can come back from it, but the track record for TOS is not great.
Man what an ugly chart. For guys older than 26 the success stories are Clayton Richard and Kenny Rogers and that is it. (Ross and Karns are still young enough that they might still be able to turn out OK but the early returns on them are obviously not good.) Moreover, only 3 guys on the entire chart came back to be better than league average (excluding Tepesch and Karns who have barely pitched afterward. Also, nod to Rogers who would have been better than league average after surgery but for his final season at age 43)
BTW – typo on the Ross line. His FIP- difference should be 29, not 2.
Another edit – I’ve got Garcia pitching 540.1 IP with a 102 ERA- and 100 FIP- after his surgery in 2014. I guess I’d consider that a success also since he came back and pitched a decent number of innings without too much dropoff from what he was before
Fixed that one as well (really not sure what happened there), and also adjusted the 27-30 cohort’s numbers.
Garcia is a strange case. He was outstanding in 2015, but then the wheels fell off afterwards, and he was never the same pitcher after that and only lasted 3 more years. Did the surgery have some kind of delayed effect on him or something?
Thanks, somehow cut a digit off there. Fixing.
Moral of the story don’t expect to walk away with much when you trade with the Rays.
With all the smart front offices out there, it continues to amaze me how the Rays continue to win every move. Huntington and company weren’t incompetent – they had recently done a decent job of building a team. Dave Littlefield, sure – the Matt Morris trade still remains the most inexplicably bad trade, Huntington’s record wasn’t terrible, by any means.
Bummer, engaging guy who should’ve had a better career. I wonder how many guys had TOS prior to 2000. I feel like Estelle Costanza. “Did they just invent that?”
Speaking as a long time Pirate fan, Archer’s time in Pittsburgh has been a major disappointment on the field. Never mind the “worst trade ever” debate, because that’s a sunk cost. If I was the GM I’d happily pay the $250K to end this experiment. I do not see Archer as part of the “new Pirates” improvement plan. That salary could be better invested in something else. That “something else” does not include putting the money away for a rainy day.
I do hope the Mr. Archer recovers and comes back for a long, successful career. He seems like a genuinely nice person.
I agree. Even if you thought he could come back, there is no way he makes a bit of difference to them next season and he’s not worth anything to anyone else on a “pick up the option and see if you can flip him at the deadline for something useful” type of deal.
The only way he’s coming back is if Pittsburgh thinks he will recover and can talk him to an extension at a major discount and as I type that out and read it, I’m thinking that is not completely out of the question. Archer’s 32 next year and unlike most 32 yo of his early talent, he hasn’t really banked much (comparatively of course. The guy still has made nearly $25M in his career so he isn’t going broke). There aren’t going to be any huge deals out there for him. If he’s willing to go low enough, maybe the Pirates bring him back on something like a 3 year deal where he might be useful in 2-3 years.
Ooooof
Kenny Rogers came back better than ever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY9Sxg8L8SM