Trevor Rosenthal Reaches for Infinity

Last month, in the wake of Bryce Harper’s signing with the Phillies, I took stock of the Nationals and raised an eyebrow at the limited fixes administered to a bullpen that has required annual midseason makeovers, and that last year tied for 25th in the majors in WAR (0.6). General manager Mike Rizzo’s big offseason moves regarding the unit were to sign Trevor Rosenthal, who missed all of 2018 due to Tommy John surgery, and Kyle Barraclough, who pitched to a 4.20 ERA and 4.98 FIP with the Marlins. So far, it hasn’t gone well, to say the least. The unit as a whole has an 11.02 ERA through five games.

Barraclough has only been charged with one run allowed in 3.1 innings, but he’s also allowed five out of five inherited runners to score. That’s no good, but it’s nothing compared to the travails of Rosenthal, a 28-year-old righty who, during his Cardinals tenure, pitched to a 2.99 ERA and 2.60 FIP while saving 121 games from 2012-17.

On March 30 against the Mets, Rosenthal entered a tied game in the eighth inning and proceeded to allow back-to-back singles to Wilson Ramos and Jeff McNeil, then walked Amed Rosario (a tough thing to do given the kid’s 4.9% walk rate last year) and served up a two-run single to J.D. Davis. Manager Davey Martinez gave him the hook in favor of Barraclough, who immediately balked in a run, and two outs later, allowed a two-run double by Pete Alonso. Thus, four runs were charged to Rosenthal, who didn’t retire a batter.

Undeterred, Martinez called on Rosenthal again the next day with the Nationals trailing the Mets 5-2 and runners on the corners courtesy of mid-March signing Tony Sipp. Facing Rosario again, Rosenthal threw just one pitch, which the 23-year-old shortstop lined for an RBI single. Sean Doolittle relieved Rosenthal and allowed back-to-back singles, the second of which scored Rosario. Another day, another outing with a run allowed but no out for Rosenthal.

He didn’t get the call again until Wednesday afternoon against the Phillies. Relieving Sipp with one out and a man on first base in the eighth inning of a game that the Nationals led 6-4, Rosenthal threw a total of 12 pitches and somehow issued walks to Maikel Franco (6.2% walk rate in 2018) and Scott Kingery (5.0%). That loaded the bases and brought on Barraclough, who served up a bases-clearing double to Andrew McCutchen and then an RBI single to Jean Segura. Two of those runs were charged to Rosenthal, who again didn’t retire a batter. Fortunately for him, Washington rebounded from the 8-6 deficit to win 9-8 on a walk-off walk by Jake Noll against Phillies reliever David Robertson.

The grim tally for Rosenthal: seven batters faced, four hits allowed, three walks allowed, seven runs allowed, an .801 wOBA against, an ERA of infinity, and — according to the Baseball-Reference Play Index — a couple of unenviable records, or shares of them.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

First, Rosenthal has tied the record (or the record going back to 1908, as far as the Play Index covers) for the most consecutive appearances without retiring a batter to start the season. The only other pitcher to fail to retire a hitter in his first three appearances was Rich Hill in 2014, during the lefty’s wilderness years. Purchased from the Red Sox, for whom he had been toiling at Triple-A Pawtucket, Hill made two appearances for the Angels during a July 1 doubleheader, walking three hitters and allowing one hit; eight days later, he drew his release, and a week after that he signed with the Yankees, who called him up in early August and summoned him into an August 5 game during which he walked the only bater he faced. Thankfully, he resumed retiring batters in his next appearance three days later. He made a total of 14 appearances totaling 5.1 innings for the Yankees; the next year, his four-start September comeback with the Red Sox began the resurrection of his career as a rotation regular.

Second, Rosenthal now holds the record for most consecutive outings allowing runs without retiring a batter with four, including his August 16, 2017 appearance with the Cardinals, during which he served up a solo homer to Xander Bogaerts and a walk to Mitch Moreland before departing due to an elbow injury.

Consecutive Appearances Allowing Runs Without Retiring a Batter
Pitcher Team Strk Start End Games H R ER BB HBP HR
Trevor Rosenthal Cards-Nats 8/16/17 4/3/19 4 5 9 9 4 0 1
Taylor Tankersley Marlins 7/23/10 7/26/10 3 3 6 5 1 1 2
Mitch Stetter Brewers 8/4/09 8/12/09 3 4 4 3 3 0 0
Chris Hammond Padres-Reds 9/24/05 4/7/06 3 4 5 5 2 0 0
Pedro Borbon Dodgers 7/30/99 8/5/99 3 4 3 3 2 0 0
Steve Avery Red Sox 4/10/98 4/14/98 3 3 3 3 2 0 0
Mike Myers Tigers 4/16/97 4/21/97 3 3 3 3 1 0 1
Bruce Dal Canton Pirates 9/2/70 9/8/70 3 5 4 4 2 0 1
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
Since 1908

A week after that appearance, the news that Rosenthal would need Tommy John surgery was announced, and in November he was unconditionally released. Including that last pre-surgery outing, he’s allowed nine runs in this gruesome stretch.

Rosenthal still has a chance to avoid one more record, that of the most consecutive appearances without retiring a single hitter. Two pitchers, one Cardinal and one National, share the record with five:

Most Consecutive Appearances Without Retiring a Batter Since 1908
Pitcher Team Strk Start End Games H R ER BB HBP HR
Trever Miller Cardinals 4/17/11 4/28/11 5 2 2 2 3 0 0
Joey Eischen Nationals 7/6/05 7/17/05 5 3 2 2 2 1 0
Trevor Rosenthal Cards-Nats 8/16/17 4/3/19 4 5 9 9 4 0 1
Wesley Wright Astros 9/14/09 9/19/09 4 5 2 2 0 0 0
Russ Springer Rays 9/5/09 9/16/09 4 6 5 5 2 0 2
Randy Choate Rays 7/9/09 7/17/09 4 4 1 1 0 0 1
Ryan Bukvich White Sox 8/20/07 8/25/07 4 5 6 6 2 2 0
Javier Lopez Diamondbacks 6/28/05 7/4/05 4 3 2 2 2 0 0
Mike Holtz Padres 9/5/02 9/12/02 4 3 4 4 4 0 0
Drew Hall Rangers 7/8/89 7/16/89 4 2 4 4 3 0 0
Paul Mirabella Rangers 8/15/82 9/6/82 4 3 4 4 3 0 0
Jim Kremmel Cubs 4/20/74 4/26/74 4 3 3 3 2 1 0
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference

The good news for Rosenthal is that his velocity is more or less back to pre-surgery form; according to Pitch Info, he’s averaging 98.5 mph on his four-seamer, not far from the 98.8 he averaged in 2017. Command and control may be another matter, as too many of his 31 pitches have caught too much of the strike zone, causing too much solid contact (91.6 mph average exit velocity and .788 xwOBA). What’s more, batters have swung at just one pitch outside the zone (Rosario’s hit) and whiffed on just two of his pitches. In the grand scheme, it’s too early to panic, but when you’re not retiring batters, there’s really no place to hide.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
7 years ago

Poor guy

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

On the bright side, despite his ERA of Infinity, he only has a FIP of 11.93. And because he has not officially pitched even a fraction of an inning year, his WAR is officially 0 and not negative.

Sammy Sooser
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I know, I’m real fun at parties, but, technically, isn’t his ERA undefined?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

Yes. But since some infinities are, er, “not defined”, both can be true. (Yes, there are multiple different “infinities” with different definitions. Yes, I am regretting writing this and I am going to press “post comment” anyway. Actual mathematicians should jump in here as they see fit)

Sammy Sooser
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d be happy to hear from actual mathematicians. Mathemagicians to me, being real, but one is a non-number, where the other is numbers forever. My reaction is lay, but the two feel like distinct opposites.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

I am interested in the distinction between mathematicians and mathemagicians. I assume it is some kind of fancy hat?

DookieHowserMD
7 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Correct! Mathematicians are the ones with silly hats.

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You can certainly go with his ERA is undefined, but if you do want to define it, +infinity is what.

jrogersMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

I think it would be correct to say as the limit of innings pitched approaches zero from the positive side, ERA approaches infinity (assuming at least 1 ER). But it’s the opposite if you approach from the negative side. If we were to accept that Rosenthal is as close to -0.1 IP as he is to 0.1 IP, you could argue his ERA should be negative infinity!

(I think. As a physics rather than math major, I’m willing to do “that’s about right” waves of the hand).

Jetsy Extrano
7 years ago
Reply to  jrogers

Except that it’s impossible to pitch negative innings (even for Kevin Jarvis). The denominator’s domain is the non-negative reals only, so it approaches zero from above. See “one-sided limit”.

LofSkrif
7 years ago
Reply to  jrogers

This is incorrect as the domain of the function is (0 to +inf) innings pitched. That is why the logic of +inf ERA follows from right side limit approximation.

Lanidrac
7 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

Division by zero is said to be undefined, because depending on the situation it can result in any kind of answer or even multiple answers (especially when dealing with 0/0), plus answers of positive or negative infinity aren’t technically defined to begin with. However, in this particular problem, solving it with limits does provide an answer of positive infinity.

yojiveself
7 years ago

maybe just bring him in early to punch out the other team’s pitcher and get him right.

ghostelephant
7 years ago
Reply to  yojiveself

The concern with that is that if he does end up giving up a hit to the pitcher, then that might just rattle him even worse

EonADSMember since 2024
7 years ago

Having an ERA of loopty-loop is probably the worst possible feeling for a pitcher. I hated games where I had nothing and couldn’t get out of the second inning in high school and college, but I was up against other amateurs and could count on a couple terrible swings or bad takes. Rosenthal really doesn’t even have that much of a luxury.

FrancoLuvHateMets
7 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

The one time someone swung at a ball and it goes for a hit. Bad luck for Rosenthal.

DDMember since 2020
7 years ago

That last table actually makes him look worse, since the two guys ahead of him (and most of the rest) are LOOGY’s who only faced 1 or two batters each appearance.

Shattenjager
7 years ago

If you’d asked me to guess guys who had multiple such disaster appearances in a row, there aren’t many names I would guess, but one is Taylor Tankersley. He was not good at getting MLB hitters out.

ScottyBMember since 2017
7 years ago

“To infinity, and beyond!”

Dadpunchers
7 years ago

first it comes for the elbow, then it comes for the shoulder. he refuses to fix his mechanics, so he will keep getting hurt. Check out @thepainguy on twitter.

KobraCola
7 years ago
Reply to  Dadpunchers

Why? That guy is literally the worst.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago

In 2015 Chris Davis would hit 47hrs and put up 5.4 WAR, a year removed from a monster 7.1 WAR season. Trevor Rosenthal would save 48 games. and put up 2+ WAR in the bullpen. In 2019 Rosenthal has yet to retire a batter through multiple tries, and Chris Davis is going for the all time at bats in a row without a hit record. Life comes at you fast.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

Maybe Rosenthal should try hitting and Davis should try pitching.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You might be on to something.

Chris Davis owns a career 0.00 ERA and 9k per 9, and while Rosenthal has a career 0 batting average, so does Chris Davis over his last 50ish at bats.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

They should definitely face each other in an at bat.

Max Power
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

He’d probably walk him

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Unfortunately, the Nationals and Orioles don’t face each other until July. The chances that both are still on their respective rosters (or any rosters) and also getting any playing time at that point seem to be pretty low.

Green Mountain Boy
7 years ago

My first inclination was to ask why Davey Martinez is employed in any capacity by any MLB team. As a Red Sox fan, I saw the Nats less than 15 times last year, but O! M! G! Martinez made HIGHLY questionable moves (or non-moves) in probably 10 of those games.

My second inclination was to think well, the GM is responsible for the manager, so who’s the Nats GM again? Then I realized it’s Mike Rizzo, and completely understood the Nats’ miserable failures on all fronts the past several years. You reap what you sow.

‘Nuf Ced! QED!

Charlie HustleMember since 2016
7 years ago

He’s been the beneficiary of good and bad luck…

On the bright side, his BABIP of 1.000 and strand rate of 0% are bound to regress.

Unfortunately, his HR/FB of 0% can only get worse.

I don’t think K-BB% of -42.9 captures his true skill set this early in the season.

Best wishes to him going forward. No one deserves to be subjected to this degree on small sample size torture after what he has gone through to get back on the mound.

psychobunny
7 years ago

Does the universe explode if Trevor Rosenthal ends up pitching to Chris Davis?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago
Reply to  psychobunny

I think you misunderstand the physics of black holes.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Yeah, the word that he’s looking for is “implode.”

LHPSU
7 years ago
Reply to  psychobunny

Well, it’s stoppable force meets movable object…

bigjimblue
7 years ago

Ron Darling made an egregious comment yesterday. He said Rosenthal could get a couple outs and his ERA would still be infinity! That’s not possible.

bravesfan
7 years ago
Reply to  bigjimblue

That touches on the obvious follow on question though, assuming he does record an out, what will his ERA become? are we talking triple digits? thousands? What is the record for the highest ever ERA reached? I feel like i need to know these things. I mean, not bad enough to actually go out and calculate it myself, but you know, internet.

EDIT: OK so my need to know overcame my lazy disposition. 1 out with no more runs would net him an ERA of 189. This would have to be worse than infinity/undefined or whatever, right? i mean, subjectively of course.

AmpersandMember since 2025
7 years ago

Has he already reached a record for consecutive batters faced scoring? 9 in a row! 4 walks, 5 hits, 9 runs. Amazing

Lanidrac
7 years ago

Well, Rosenthal has now set the record for most appearances to begin a season without recording an out and has tied the record for most consecutive appearances without recording an out.

On the bright side, at least he didn’t give up any runs this time. Cue sarcastic cheer.

eaeolianMember since 2018
7 years ago

Yeah, well, he took a part of the consecutive games without retiring a batter yesterday.

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago

grumble, grumble. we did nada to fix our weakness from 2017 and 2018. Meanwhile many former Nats failed starters are pitching very well in other pens such as Craig Stammen, Milone, etc.