What Do the Projections Say About the 2023 Schedule?

On Thursday, MLB announced the 2023 schedule, implementing the alterations originally announced when the current collective bargaining agreement was signed back in March. The existing format, under which the 2022 season is being played, has been largely stable since 2013, the season the Houston Astros moved to the American League. That change evened out all six divisions to five teams each, making for a tidy format in which every team played their divisional opponents 19 times and the rest of the teams in their league six or seven times, with 20 interleague games against a rotating division and officially designated MLB rivals.
Before 2001, MLB’s schedule tended to be a good deal more balanced. During the divisional era before interleague play, six-team divisions typically played 18 games against their divisional opponents and 12 against non-divisional opponents; seven-team divisions had a nearly even 13/12 split (the American League did 15 vs. 10 or 11 for a couple years after the 1977 expansion). In 2001, MLB went all-in on an unbalanced schedule, with the idea being that by having teams play their divisional rivals more often, you’d create greater tension in the divisional races and more intense regional rivalries. Whether this approach actually accomplished its goals is difficult to tell. I can’t think of any new rivalries that were created simply by playing more games and tend to believe that rivalries are born from teams playing more meaningful games against each other, not simply from seeing each other more often. Red Sox and Yankees fans don’t appear to have hated each other any more in 2010 than they did in 2000, and the endless Orioles-Rays series in the days before Tampa Bay was competitive made this O’s fan click over to other games, not foster a hatred for the Rays.
Be that as it may, from a philosophical standpoint, heavily unbalanced schedules make the most sense when winning divisional races is the sole or at least primary way of making the playoffs and much less so when more Wild Card spots exist. When you have a lot of Wild Card spots, you create a fundamental bit of unfairness when the divisions are of meaningfully differing strengths; teams in weak divisions are competing directly against teams in stronger divisions for those Wild Card spots, with the former generally having easier schedules.
With half the playoff spots now going to Wild Card teams, a shift to a more balanced schedule was needed and probably overdue. Of course, a perfectly even schedule is impossible due to the very nature of physical existence; the Dodgers get the benefit of never having to play the Dodgers, and this year’s Washington Nationals don’t enjoy easy series against themselves. But I think we should strive to make the schedules more equal, not less.
So how does the actual 2023 schedule change things? To get an idea, I went back to this year’s preseason rosters and projections, and compared 2022’s projected strength of schedule to what it would have been if we replaced this year’s schedule with 2023’s:
| Team | 2022 Schedule Strength | 2023 Schedule Strength | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago White Sox | .485 | .492 | .007 |
| Houston Astros | .491 | .495 | .004 |
| Minnesota Twins | .491 | .495 | .004 |
| St. Louis Cardinals | .492 | .495 | .004 |
| Cleveland Guardians | .493 | .496 | .004 |
| Detroit Tigers | .495 | .498 | .002 |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | .495 | .497 | .002 |
| San Francisco Giants | .498 | .500 | .002 |
| Milwaukee Brewers | .494 | .496 | .002 |
| Kansas City Royals | .500 | .502 | .002 |
| Tampa Bay Rays | .497 | .499 | .002 |
| San Diego Padres | .498 | .499 | .001 |
| New York Yankees | .498 | .500 | .001 |
| Toronto Blue Jays | .498 | .499 | .001 |
| Boston Red Sox | .498 | .499 | .001 |
| Chicago Cubs | .500 | .500 | .000 |
| Texas Rangers | .500 | .500 | .000 |
| Seattle Mariners | .497 | .496 | -.001 |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | .505 | .504 | -.001 |
| Cincinnati Reds | .502 | .501 | -.001 |
| Colorado Rockies | .510 | .508 | -.002 |
| Los Angeles Angels | .500 | .498 | -.002 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | .509 | .507 | -.002 |
| Atlanta Braves | .505 | .502 | -.003 |
| Baltimore Orioles | .513 | .509 | -.004 |
| New York Mets | .507 | .503 | -.004 |
| Oakland Athletics | .508 | .504 | -.004 |
| Washington Nationals | .511 | .506 | -.005 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | .510 | .505 | -.005 |
| Miami Marlins | .511 | .505 | -.006 |
Looking at the strength of schedule, teams in the NL East get easier schedules in 2023, while teams in the AL and NL Central mostly got tougher ones. That shouldn’t be all that surprising, but the AL East teams not getting softer schedules might be, highlighting the less-talked-about issue of how interleague play is designed. AL East teams drew the NL Central as their primary opponent this year, canceling out some of the natural penalties inherent to the unbalanced intraleague schedule.
What kind of effect does this change in the schedule have on pennant races? I again went to the Opening Day projections and re-ran ZiPS with 2023’s schedule:
| Team | Division Before | Division After | Difference | Playoffs Before | Playoffs After | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami Marlins | 9.2% | 9.9% | 0.7% | 33.5% | 37.4% | 4.0% |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 10.8% | 11.4% | 0.5% | 37.1% | 40.7% | 3.6% |
| Los Angeles Angels | 10.5% | 11.9% | 1.4% | 28.5% | 31.3% | 2.9% |
| Seattle Mariners | 28.7% | 30.5% | 1.9% | 56.0% | 58.0% | 1.9% |
| New York Mets | 34.2% | 34.0% | -0.2% | 69.2% | 71.0% | 1.9% |
| Washington Nationals | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 1.3% |
| Texas Rangers | 4.0% | 4.4% | 0.3% | 13.7% | 14.6% | 0.9% |
| Atlanta Braves | 43.8% | 42.6% | -1.2% | 76.2% | 77.1% | 0.9% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 25.1% | 25.3% | 0.3% | 68.5% | 69.1% | 0.5% |
| Boston Red Sox | 24.8% | 24.9% | 0.1% | 68.5% | 69.0% | 0.5% |
| New York Yankees | 22.6% | 22.6% | 0.0% | 65.6% | 65.9% | 0.3% |
| Cincinnati Reds | 2.1% | 2.5% | 0.4% | 5.8% | 6.1% | 0.3% |
| Oakland A’s | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Kansas City Royals | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.2% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 0.1% |
| Colorado Rockies | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 0.1% |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 0.1% |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Detroit Tigers | 2.6% | 2.9% | 0.3% | 6.3% | 6.3% | 0.0% |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 27.5% | 27.2% | -0.3% | 71.0% | 70.9% | -0.1% |
| Chicago Cubs | 6.0% | 6.7% | 0.6% | 15.4% | 15.2% | -0.2% |
| Cleveland Guardians | 9.8% | 10.5% | 0.7% | 20.8% | 20.3% | -0.5% |
| Minnesota Twins | 28.3% | 29.4% | 1.1% | 48.0% | 46.6% | -1.4% |
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 54.9% | 54.4% | -0.5% | 87.0% | 85.3% | -1.7% |
| Milwaukee Brewers | 37.9% | 38.5% | 0.6% | 60.4% | 58.4% | -2.0% |
| Houston Astros | 56.6% | 52.9% | -3.6% | 76.9% | 74.9% | -2.0% |
| San Diego Padres | 29.9% | 30.4% | 0.4% | 73.1% | 71.0% | -2.1% |
| San Francisco Giants | 14.9% | 14.8% | 0.0% | 53.6% | 50.5% | -3.0% |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 53.6% | 51.9% | -1.7% | 72.1% | 68.8% | -3.3% |
| Chicago White Sox | 58.5% | 56.2% | -2.3% | 73.2% | 69.7% | -3.5% |
There are obviously some team projections that ZiPS really missed on entering the season, such as the Baltimore Orioles. But the general idea here isn’t necessarily to see which specific teams benefit, but rather to get an idea of how much a playoff picture can change simply as a result of the altered schedule.
Generally speaking, the changes are relatively small. We tend to overrate just how different in strength baseball teams are. ZiPS saw the strongest division entering the season as the NL East (.525) and the weakest as the AL Central (.480). But while it’s a small shift, moving a win in one direction or another can easily be three or four percentage points in playoff probability at the start of the season. Teams trade a lot of prospects in July just to boost their bottom line for the season by a win or two! In a very tight race, that change in the schedule could make all the difference.
MLB has made a lot of changes to the game in recent years, and not all of them have been to the sport’s benefit. But if you want to see teams play on a more even playing field, this change is a good one.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
The Astros are in the American League??
Braves- Astros confused A LOT of people in memory care
Brewers are in the National League
Lol, nobody loves the Brewers more than me.
Brewers fans love you back, Beer!
I’d like to see a Dodgers vs Dodgers matchup. Nationals vs Nationals less so
They figured out how to do it in Super Dodgeball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3Bl7C_6Yws
I’d like to see them get rid of division rankings and go back to a single league table given they’re trying to balance the schedules more. Divisions are just fundamentally unfair when you have some divisions with multiple teams that have no interest in competing (The centrals) and some where it’s a dogfight to even get third. Honestly, the new playoff spots have solved a lot of the problems around the fundamental unfairness here, but haven’t done much to solve the fact that there are a few teams that are just uninterested in competing.
There really isn’t a way to force teams to want to compete without relegation.
Relegation probably isn’t possible, but a forced sale to the league definitely is.
Then the league would have to buy about 10 teams every year
I doubt it. Tanking is due to the economic incentives. Owning a MLB team is somewhat like having a license to print money. If forced sale for being deliberately non-competitive were on the table, then owners would try real hard to not look deliberately non-competitive.
OTOH: The league IS the owners, they’re unlikely to agree to any deal where they can be easily forced to give up their teams.
There does need to be some kind of accountabiity though. For example, I doubt Oakland is pulling its weight, and the league would be better off either without them or with different ownership. Yes the A’s ownership would object but the 20 teams that are actually trying to build a fanbase would vote them out if it weren’t a gigantically large deal like it is now.
Raw deal for the west coast teams whose travel schedules now get even worse.
I don’t buy this in 2022. Pro athletes flying charter for 3-4 hours to play baseball shouldn’t be a miniscule difference if at all. They’re not flying commercial or taking the bus.
Mariners still have significantly more travel than any of the other teams. Cannot find a lot of recent information, but Mariners log double as many miles as the Reds, for example. Cannot say that plays zero factor, constant time zone changes, etc.
They already do a lot to mitigate this through east coast/west coast swings through multiple teams. The new format might actually reduce frequency of very long flights and maybe miles covered.
Sure, but is a 4 hour flight followed by an off day twice as bad as an hour flight?
I’d be interested in digging into the data. But especially pitchers who don’t even play every day I have serious doubts it impacts them.
It affects performance in basketball, and anecdotally seems to really affect peoples’ sleep schedules because of time zone changes. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78901-2
If that’s the case then they really should just get all their games on the east coast over with in one long trip.
But the Reds have to eat the chili.
You’re entitled to your opinion, of course. But the limited data we have suggests there is a measurable effect.
A better way to “balance” the reward of a good season is to just have an NL and an AL, give the top 2 seeds a bye, then the next 4 with the best if 3 series as-is.
Giving the AL Central a harder schedule doesn’t change the fact that the winner of the division is the 6th best team and shouldn’t host a playoff game.
NL – Mets, Phillies, Nationals, Braves, Marlins, Reds, Pirates
AL – Blue Jays, Red Sox, Yankees, Orioles, Rays, Guardians, Tigers
Central – Twins, Brewers, Cubs, White Sox, Royals, Cardinals, Astros, Rangers
West – Mariners, Rockies, Diamondbacks, Padres, Angels, Dodgers, Giants, Athletics
CWS format playoffs — include Central and Pacific League Winners, KBO winner and Mexican League Winner. Top 2 from each Division + 4 WC chosen however.
Semifinals and World Series are Best of 7