Willy Adames Signs Giant Contract

Through the first week of December, the steady trickle of free agency had almost exclusively included pitchers and catchers. Other position players, understandably, seemed to be waiting out Juan Soto’s market, as the price tag for Zoomer Ted Williams reportedly continues to climb. But as the baseball glitterati descend on Dallas for the Winter Meetings, at least one top position player will already have a new home.
Shortstop Willy Adames is now a San Francisco Giant. Adames was the no. 2 overall free agent on Ben Clemens’ Top 50 list, and the first major acquisition for new Giants president of baseball operations Buster Posey. It’s quite a splashy move; Adames’ seven-year, $182 million contract is the largest, by total value, the Giants have ever given out, beating the eight-year, $167 million extension Posey himself signed in 2013.
Records are made to broken.
For the past two offseasons, the previous Giants leadership, under Farhan Zaidi, navigated free agency in a manner commensurate with the club’s semi-contender status. Zaidi came up short in his bid to bring Aaron Judge home, and the club backed out of a $300 million-plus contract agreement with Carlos Correa. But the Giants did wait out the market last winter to sign Blake Snell and Matt Chapman, in both cases to great success in 2024.
Posey, then merely a minority owner, was involved in signing Chapman to a six-year, $151 million extension this September, mere weeks before the 2012 MVP executed his palace coup and shoved Zaidi off the castle parapet. Now, he’s thrown an even bigger contract, including a $22 million signing bonus, at the top free agent infielder on the market. Whatever other worries Posey has for the remainder of the 2020s, the left side of the infield won’t be one of them.
The dollar figure is intriguing; as much as we here at FanGraphs like Adames, Ben predicted a five-year, $145 million payday for the former Brewer. Our median crowdsource estimate came in at six years and $150 million — a higher overall dollar figure but a lower AAV. Seven years and $182 million is $26 million per year, or Ben’s number plus two years at $13.5 million each, if you want to think of it that way.
Another way you could think of it: This is a crapload of money for a player who has never made an All-Star team, never posted a 5.0 WAR season or better, never won a Gold Glove or Silver Slugger, and never finished higher than 10th in MVP voting.
Who could’ve seen this coming?
Well, if you’ll allow a brief digression for a victory lap, I did! One of the very first articles I wrote for FanGraphs, back in September 2022, was about how Adames had quietly played himself into the upper tier of shortstops and was in line to make $150 million or more when he hit free agency.
I bring that up not just because I love being right, but because the logic I followed then (and in my follow-up column from this past March) still holds. And for the Giants fans who understandably aren’t intimately familiar with Adames’ portfolio, that logic answers the burning questions of “Who is this guy?” and “Why the heck is he making almost $200 million?”
Adames is a career .248/.322/.444 hitter. He’s a good defensive shortstop, but not a great one. His 21 stolen bases this past season more than doubled his previous career high. If you’re looking for something that Adames does at an elite level, you’re going to have a long and frustrating time of it. But if you want to know what Adames does well, the answer is: “Basically everything.”
More than that, he’s incredibly consistent. Every hitter has ups and downs within a season, and Adames is no exception. But on a year-by-year level, he’s metronomic. Every year since 2021, he’s posted at least 550 plate appearances, 20 home runs, and 3.0 or more WAR. If you prorate the pandemic-shortened 2020 season to 162 games, that streak goes back six seasons, to Adames’ first full year in the majors.
Even I wouldn’t say that Adames is among the absolute top-tier shortstops in the game, but you don’t have to be that to get paid $26 million a year. Here’s what you might consider Adames’ peer group: shortstops on big contracts, with their WAR in the three seasons leading up to signing their current deals.
| Player | Age | 3YR WAR* | Career High WAR** | Type | Years | AAV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Lindor | 28 | 18.8 | 7.8 | Mid-Arb Extension | 10 | $31.9M |
| Trea Turner | 29 | 16.3 | 7.1 | Free Agent | 11 | $27.3M |
| Dansby Swanson | 28 | 15.6 | 6.6 | Free Agent | 7 | $25.3M |
| Corey Seager | 27 | 13.6 | 5.2 | Free Agent | 10 | $32.5M |
| Xander Bogaerts | 30 | 14.4 | 6.0 | Free Agent | 11 | $25.5M |
| Carlos Correa | 28 | 13.6 | 6.3 | Free Agent | 6 | $33.3M |
| J.P. Crawford | 27 | 8.0 | 3.1 | Mid-Arb Extension | 5 | $10.2M |
| Bobby Witt Jr. | 23 | 8.1*** | 5.8 | Pre-Arb Extension | 11 | $26.3M |
| Javier Báez | 29 | 11.6 | 5.8 | Free Agent | 6 | $23.3M |
| Trevor Story | 29 | 14.2 | 6.0 | Free Agent | 6 | $23.3M |
| Willy Adames | 29 | 12.5 | 4.8 | Free Agent | 7 | $26.0M |
**At time of signing
***In two seasons
Adames loses out to the other players on this table (except Crawford) in peak one-year WAR, but everyone except Lindor has a catch. Seager, Correa, and Story keep getting hurt. Báez left his bat in Chicago. Swanson is still a superb defender, but his offense has regressed since joining the Cubs, perhaps because he picked up the cursed bat Báez left behind. Turner is so streaky he got Phillies fans to feel sorry for him. Bogaerts is on a much longer contract. Witt is a bargain at $26.3 million a year, but the Giants won’t be able to sign a player like him in free agency. (Though if the Orioles keep screwing around and let Gunnar Henderson walk, San Francisco might have a chance to come close in a few years.)
Posey comes into his job with next to no baseball ops experience, and is so new he hasn’t earned the benefit of the doubt. And make no mistake: He’ll have to. Posey is one of the best all-around baseball players I’ve ever seen, and he’ll be able to draw on everything he learned from more than a decade in the majors, as well as two years on the Giants’ board of directors. But playing baseball requires different skills than running a team; when Posey took over the Giants, he had as much formal baseball ops experience as the guy behind you in line at 7-Eleven.
We’ve gone so far around the bend that having an ex-player running a team is a rarity, especially one who hasn’t come up through the ranks as a scout, coach, or other kind of analyst. Furthermore — and I say this intending no undue disrespect — retired superstars like Posey, thrust into analysis or consulting roles, can be impulsive and incurious. It’s up to Posey to confound the stereotype.
Given Posey’s lack of experience, and Adames’ lack of star power for a player this high on a free agent ranking, it’s easy to view this signing as an overpay by a president of baseball ops who’s already out of his depth and doesn’t realize it. I don’t think that’s an indefensible position, and with time, it could prove to be the right read on the situation.
But I do think that view underrates two things: First, that $26 million a year isn’t what it used to be. Luis Severino just got $22.3 million a year from an A’s team that’s too poor to afford a first name. Second, consistent above-average play might not be sexy, but it’s valuable. Especially at shortstop. There’s a reason that Adames has been a must-start for a playoff team in five of his six full seasons in the majors. And those Rays and Brewers clubs had far fewer resources than these Giants.
About those Giants: They could still use a bit more star power. Between Chapman, Adames, Jung Hoo Lee, Patrick Bailey, and LaMonte Wade Jr., they’ve got good players — even very good players — across the field. But Logan Webb is the only player on the projected roster who’s a threat to win an MVP or a Cy Young. Supposedly, Posey and his crew aim to sign a top-end free agent pitcher as well. (Hey, isn’t Corbin Burnes from California?)
If so, good — they could use another big name.
Which is a pretty uncharitable thing to say about a team that just gave the biggest contract in franchise history to the no. 2 free agent on the market, I realize. But the NL West is a tough place to win right now. The Dodgers just romped to a championship and are only getting better. The Diamondbacks won the pennant in 2023, suffered a terrible glut of slumps and injuries, and improved their regular-season record by five games anyway. The Padres are, as ever, unpredictable, but they’re one of the more talented teams in any division.
The Giants could be legitimately good in 2025 and still finish fourth in the division. Writing Adames’ name into the lineup 150 games a year will go a long way toward overcoming that formidable opposition.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
This is very likely an overpay but when we started seeing teams view him as a potential third baseman it kicked his market into high gear.
There was such a dearth of above average hitters who could credibly play second or third base and he hits well enough to profile well at those spots. I think every team in Major League Baseball would find him to be an upgrade at either shortstop or third base.
The result is that his free agency resembled a starter more than an infielder. Everyone needs starters, so the market for them is always robust. 30 teams need someone like them. This is essentially what happened with Adames.
In any case, the Giants are rich enough to overpay like this to fill a need so they might not regret this the way a team like the Twins would. And he’s widely considered one of the best clubhouse guys in baseball. It’s a nice move in the short term.
I have no idea why your post was downvoted. I think you nailed most of the salient points and I think it’s a good signing by Posey and the Giants. But gee that is a really tough division to be in right now.
I don’t know but remember that some people are real sensitive to calling any MLB free agent deal an “overpay.”
I don’t mean to speak for everyone here, but I don’t think this is good analysis. Everyone’s market has been more robust than expected. What evidence do you have that Adames being open to playing other positions had any real impact on his market? The arrogant tone you often use in commenting here probably also has something to do with the downvoting.
What arrogant tone? I don’t recall him being arrogant once.
Not gonna engage with the latter part of your comment but I think the earlier part brings up a question: how much of his market was driven by teams who wanted him at second or third base (Mets, Yankees, Phillies, Astros, maybe Blue Jays and Red Sox) and how much of this was driven by teams who wanted him at shortstop (Braves, maybe Blue Jays and Red Sox). One other team is potentially enough so if the Braves offered $170M or something like that then it might have been enough for this anyway. I think it’s more plausible that one of the other teams was the second highest bid just based on the number of other teams looking at him as a third baseman. And that the Braves don’t have long history of offering big contracts on the free agent market under the current front office.
I don’t think the argument “it is a hot free agent market” is an ideal explanation even if it is technically true. Hot free agent markets are due to lots of interest in free agents, and there is no guarantee that all parts of the free agent market will be equally hot. This is especially true since many of the free agents with more interest sign earlier in the offseason.
This winter the market is running hot
The ZIPS projection probably sees this as an overpay (did I miss that in the article?) but I doubt it’s far off. A solid but unspectacular 4-ish WAR/yr for the first three years will actually be nice but it’s not going to overwhelm anyone unless he gets some timely post season hits, I guess.
Are we sure about this? Or rather, if you’re rich enough in theory but unwilling to spend in practice, overpaying can still handicap the team in future years. I think you’re right that a ton of teams would be in on Adames as a player at some price, sure. But this is the exact kind of deal that most often causes teams to have problems down the line — committing long-term, star-level free agent money for a non-superstar player.
It may be a matter of degree rather than of type…
I wanted the NATS to sign him. CJ Abrams can hit, but his defense is suspect. He will likely have to move off SS eventually.
Abrams needs an off the field positive role model as well as that would seem to be a larger issue than his talent. A decent portion of the value of a player like Adames is off the field as well and may well have had a positive impact on Abrams.
“Suspect” is being very kind to Abrams’ defense. As a shortstop he’s probably the worst full-timer in the league (1st percentile OAA last year). Any movement to his glove side is disastrous for him, and he somehow got worse to his arm-side this past season as well. I don’t think he can play the infield at all.
I was pretty sure, based on no evidence whatsoever, that the Dodgers were going to grab him. He was a great fit for them.
Pretty much any proven good player can be a fit for the dodgers, the way the team is setup now. They have enough multiposition players the can move them around to accommodate whoever they sign.
At SS they are, nominally, starting out with Mookie, which moves Edman to CF and leaves RF open for Soto. (Until he signs elsewhere.) If they got Adames, Mookie would’ve moved to 2b or back to RF.
On the other hand, for Adames money they can re-sign Hernandez and maybe Santander. And neither would require a 7 year deal.
Among the many things the Dodgers big bucks allow them to do is bid up the asking price of any player that is a potential fit. Like Soto. Going into the off-season, I got flack for suggesting bidding would start at $550M and *maybe* hit $600M. Then the Dodgers said they were interested (rumor says they opened at $600M) and now the narrative is he’ll get $700M+.
Defining the market for players they don’t need or want is useful. It muddies the waters and makes they real targets easier to get. And what the dodgers most need is starters.
Rojas or Edman, more likely. And Rojas hit like crazy last year when he was healthy. They actually have a lot of options in the middle with Lux and Betts in there as well, and they can mix and match and move guys from IF to OF pretty much at will, which matches Roberts’s spare parts philosophy pretty much to a T. Adames wasn’t a huge upgrade over Rojas last year though, offensively, and a clear downgrade defensively. He would have been an uncharacteristically luxury signing for Friedman in my opinion.
Great fit for any team that needs a shortstop. Giants, Dodgers, Braves, and Red Sox are all easy fits.
Interesting that there had not been any real rumors linking the Dodgers to Adames lately. But they seem into to the idea of either Lux or Betts playing shortstop. I don’t know if that came before they saw Adames’ price tag or after.
Not sure how so many people keep missing the fact that the Dodgers already re-signed Miguel Rojas and that he played more games at SS for them last year than anybody else.
Even more reason to not sign Adames. (IMO he is the only one who can play the position defensively, and it seems like he should wind up in a pseudo platoon with Edman splitting time at SS and CF)
Uhhhh Michael, I think your math is off. 182-145=37, not 27
As a Brewer fan, wish Willy all the best. He was a fine player for the Crew and an even better teammate
Adames is the kind of player more appreciated by player analysts than marketers. He’s a lot more valuable in terms of winning than entertainingly spectacular to casual observers. Under NFL rules he’d be a average to below average defender, and a fringe batter
I don’t particularly like this signing for the Giants because his best remaining years are likely to be the next 1-2 when the team is a fringe playoff contender, unless they also sign Corbin Burnes or Juan Soto
I’d rather have seen them acquire someone who’ll be above average in years 3-5. But Texas went from 68 wins to WS title so it’s not ridiculous
This is always the issue with free agents on teams that aren’t immediate contenders since many of the best ones often don’t hit free agency until about age 30. It’s why players coming from the NPB do well and why Guerrero and probably Bichette will get monster deals when they sign. When you don’t have to worry about timing a competitive window there will be a lot more bidders.
Is there another bichette im not aware of?
Yes, so good.
There are specific reasons Severino got that much from the team he got it from, though. Then again, overpaying might be the only way to get free agents to sign in SF, too.
I don’t think it’s much of an overpay, actually. But I also don’t think it’s an especially exciting signing. I’d want Adames on my team over not having him, I suppose, but I don’t know if I’d want to allocate a significant share of my team’s resources to him, either, so the Giants really need to follow up on this with other impact moves to make this not seem like yet another isolated round of pin the tail on the donkey.
I recall when I saw the Top 50 projections come out saying “why would Adames get less than the Dansby Swanson deal?” and well, he didnt. People should probably look more at these benchmarks, as the actual millions of dollars matter less to people at these figures than the ego of saying “I got more than that guy.” The next one will be Bregman and the Chapman deal
I do think the Giants are not the greatest fit for him particularly because of Chapman, as I believe his combo of declining range and strong arm does mean he is destined for a move to 3rd at some point but I suppose with the salary inflation going on he could always be traded in a few years, or maybe the Giants’ old guy magic dust revitalizes his range
Obv this won’t happen, but with Chapmans elite speed (feels weird to type) and range I wonder what the results would be if they switched positions. Like probably not better, but probably closer than we think. With that said playing SS next to Chapman always makes your numbers better too.