Yankees Add Bellinger, Cubs Dump Bellinger’s Contract

Kamil Krzaczynski-USA TODAY Sports

It’s probably been an awkward few weeks for Cody Bellinger. It’s been an open secret that the Chicago Cubs were trying to move him despite having signed him to a three-year, $80 million contract just one offseason ago. The emergence of Pete Crow-Armstrong as a credible hitter had already made Bellinger (and/or Seiya Suzuki) expendable, and once the Cubs won the Kyle Tucker sweepstakes, it was just a matter of waiting for the other shoe to drop.

And what a grand, stripey shoe it is. The New York Yankees have graciously agreed to take Bellinger off the Cubs’ hands, and to absorb all but $5 million of his remaining contract. Chicago also gets right-handed pitcher Cody Poteet in the deal. Thus the Great Cosmic Balance of Codys remains undisturbed.

Bellinger’s time in Chicago came to an end because he committed that unforgivable sin of merely being pretty good when his contract demanded more. Bellinger hit .307/.356/.525 in his first season with the Cubs, on a one-year prove-it deal. In 2024, he was a little more pedestrian: .266/.325/.426 with just 18 home runs — still good for a 109 wRC+, and with average defense in center field, 2.2 WAR.

Bellinger will make $27.5 million in 2025 and $25 million in 2026, but he can opt out after this upcoming season for a $5 million buyout. That means that if Bellinger stinks in 2026, the Yankees (or, previously, the Cubs) would be on the hook for an additional season at $25 million. But if he’s good enough to try his luck in free agency for the third time in four years, Bellinger could exercise his opt-out, effectively costing the Yankees $32.5 million for just one season.

If Bellinger puts up something like a five-win season, the Yankees would probably be happy with that deal, but it does give this trade a little less upside than your garden variety salary dump.

Fortunately, the Yankees have a spare $31 million in payroll to throw around after taking Juan Soto off their books.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

It’s the latest odd turn for a player whose career has awed and mystified in equal measure. A first baseman who turned into a good defensive center fielder, a Rookie of the Year at 22, an MVP at 24, and a World Series winner at 25, Bellinger spent the final two seasons of his Dodgers tenure battling a multitude of injuries and a multi-year slump.

Peak Bellinger was able to swat 40 homers with ease, while still maintaining a strikeout rate not too much higher than his walk rate. That’s gone now, or at least the power is; he’s posted an ISO higher than .180 just once over the last four seasons.

Even Bellinger’s renaissance in 2023 had the signs of a mirage: He outproduced his xwOBA by 43 points, and posted a BABIP of .319, after putting up a .277 mark in the first six seasons of his career. Was there regression in Bellinger’s batted-ball luck in 2024? To an extent, but he also just wasn’t hitting the ball that hard. His xwOBACON dropped from .357 in 2023 to a career-low .326 in 2024, and even that previous mark was down more than 100 points from his MVP season.

Nowadays, Bellinger is the complete opposite of the type of player he looks like. He’s listed at 6-foot-4 and 203 pounds, and up close you’d swear that he’s at least 20% bigger in all dimensions, but he generates a lot of soft contact.

I apologize for giving the impression that I’m down on Bellinger, because he really is a good fit for the Yankees in several respects. Even before you get to the tangible on-field stuff, Bellinger is, as I just said, a gigantic man, and that fits with the Yankees’ whole vibe. Moreover, his father, Clay, played almost all of his major league career with the Yankees, where he had more World Series rings than career extra-base hits. (This is not literally true, but it’s plausible enough you were about to go look it up.)

Mostly it comes down to this. Here are the five players who played at least an inning in center field for New York this past season, plus Bellinger.

Yankees Center Fielders, 2024-25
Name Team Innings OAA FRV Def wRC+
Aaron Judge NYY 903 -5 -3 -5.5 218
Jazz Chisholm Jr. MIA/NYY 829 1/3 1 2 -0.1 110
Trent Grisham NYY 485 1/3 2 3 1.5 91
Cody Bellinger CHC 403 2/3 0 -1 -1.7 109
Jasson Domínguez NYY 35 -1 -1 -1.0 84
Alex Verdugo NYY 15 1/3 0 0 0.3 83

Judge was the best overall center fielder in baseball in 2024, but that’s entirely on the strength of his bat. He probably could’ve rode around on a unicycle wearing hockey gloves and still come out as an above-average overall player. But Judge was a below-average defender in center, and ideally you probably want him to play right field.

Which he can do now, because both of the Yankees’ previous incumbent corner outfielders — Verdugo and Soto — are no longer with the team. Put Judge in right, Domínguez in left, and find someone to stand between them. Chisholm has extensive big league experience in center, but using him there would open up a hole at either second or third base, and that would require an external solution.

That leaves Grisham, who’s a good defender, but nowhere near the hitter that even late-stage Bellinger is. With the Cubs, Bellinger was expected to carry the lineup. The Yankees already have that guy, so if Bellinger is just an above-average hitter and a solid defender in center, that’s great. Bellinger also still has the ability to play first base, where he started 57 games and logged more than 500 innings over two seasons in Chicago. So if the Yankees don’t sign someone else and the Ben Rice experiment fizzles out at some point, Bellinger can offer them an option at yet another position of weakness.

And as you’re reading this, you’re probably screaming into your phone on the subway and frightening strangers, because I haven’t mentioned the best part: Bellinger stands to get a huge boost from a more favorable home ballpark. In 2024, he posted a 99 wRC+ at home and a 117 wRC+ on the road. The Friendly Confines were anything but. And there’s a specific reason to expect Bellinger to benefit: Wrigley Field has a big cutout in straightaway right field that puts the foul pole 353 feet from home plate — 39 feet farther than the right field fence at Yankee Stadium. And I expect that to be a big deal for a hitter with Bellinger’s specific characteristics.

See, most home runs are not actually 450-foot upper-deck screamers. If you hit the ball in the right place, you don’t have to hit it especially hard to end up on the trot. And Bellinger hits the ball in the right place: He’s a fly ball-happy pull-side hitter.

That means Bellinger gets a lot of home runs for his relatively limited bang. In 2024, he had just 67 balls in play with an exit velocity of at least 100 mph, or two more than Rob Refsnyder. But almost a quarter of Bellinger’s triple-digit batted balls — 23.9% the 13th-highest percentage among roughly 200 hitters with 10 or more home runs — ended up in the seats. Again, that’s with Bellinger playing half his games at Wrigley.

According to Baseball Savant’s expected home runs table, Yankee Stadium would’ve been the third-most home run-friendly park for Bellinger this past season, after Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati and Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia. Bellinger hit 18 home runs in 2024; had he played all his games at Yankee Stadium, he would’ve hit 24. Had he played all of his games at Wrigley (instead of occasionally going on the road, as big league ballplayers are obliged to do), he would’ve hit just 15 — that total was tied for the fifth lowest out of the 30 parks. Whatever Bellinger’s feelings about Chicago and the Cubs in general, he’s probably happy to dispense with his viny tormentor.

And the Cubs will be equally happy to be rid of his contract.

The Cubs offloaded a sizeable financial commitment for a player who no longer occupied a position of need. I have no idea if the Cubs’ savings will go back into the major league roster, or whether they’ll get shuffled into God knows what corner of the Ricketts family’s banking, real estate, and political empire. I hope, for the sake of Cubs fans and the country, that it’s the former.

And I suppose it’s worth mentioning Poteet, a 30-year-old right-hander who came to the Yankees as a free agent a year ago, after bouncing around for a while in the Marlins’ and Royals’ farm systems. Poteet has made 24 big league appearances, 13 of them starts, over parts of three seasons. He mixes five pitches, ranging from an upper-70s curveball to a low-90s four-seamer/sinker fastball combo.

With the Marlins, he was more fastball-slider-changeup, but the Yankees had him lean more heavily on his slower breaking pitches: a sweeper and the aforementioned curveball. In five appearances (four starts) over 24 1/3 innings, Poteet’s results were great: a 3-0 record and a 2.22 ERA. But he gave up more hard contact than those numbers would indicate, and in those 24 1/3 innings, he struck out only 16 batters, against 18 hits, eight walks, and a hit batter.

Poteet is a serviceable swingman, and he has two options left, but if the Yankees had needed him in the majors they would’ve used him. And even though you can never have too much starting pitching depth, the Cubs were already pretty well-stocked. Poteet would be no higher than seventh on the Cubs’ starting pitching depth chart, and possibly as low as 10th, depending on how Cade Horton’s shoulder feels. And that’s assuming that the Cubs — who have been linked to Jesús Luzardo on the trade market — don’t go out and keep adding.

All of which reinforces the idea that Bellinger’s contract is the big moving part here. The Yankees are basically just paying cash — albeit lots of it — for a player you can’t get on the open market this year. Our Free Agent Tracker lists Harrison Bader as the best remaining free agent center fielder by 2025 projected WAR. Even counting players who have already signed, the list goes to Mike Tauchman way faster than the Yankees would probably like. If Tyler O’Neill is worth $49.5 million over three seasons, this can’t be that much of an overpay.

Bellinger won’t fill the wound left in the Yankees’ psyche when Soto left. But he will fill the hole in center field.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

72 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
cashgod27Member since 2024
1 year ago

I feel this is an opportunity to say that the Yankees really should shrink the LF gap. They basically need two starting CFs because LF is so huge, which is a massive obstacle to roster construction, as seen by them needing to get Bellinger instead of a guy like Teoscar Hernandez or Anthony Santander. If the Orioles are going to openly alter their field dimensions to better fit their currently constructed roster, I see no good reason why the Yankees shouldn’t do the same.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Bellinger offers flexibility as he can be good at CF or 1b and is a Lefty who can pull balls to the short rf porch.
Yanks have stated he’s going to CF so Judge can go to RF.
Not many available CF with his offense and all he cost is a useful Arm.

Presumably Dominguez is going to LF or AAA. Depending on how they see his defense is how they fill 1B. If they see him eventually taking over CF then they could go with a short term filler instead of Walker.

Good move for NYY.

Cubs? TBD.
Surely they’re using the salary they dumped on something useful, right?
Right?

Last edited 1 year ago by fjtorres
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Don’t worry – the Ricketts fam will use this saved money to support a politician of whom we haven’t yet heard…and will spend the next 30 years trying ton overturn Obergefell.

Last edited 1 year ago by Cool Lester Smooth
ThomasMember since 2017
1 year ago

Sad but very likely true.

EarthboundMisfitMember since 2024
1 year ago

That hurts, but it is unfortunately true…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Nah, teams should have weird outfield dimensions that they can plan for and other teams don’t. If anything, the Yankees should get a weirder outfield, it’s got nothing on Fenway, Globe Life, or Minute Maid.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Bring back the CF hill and flagpole!!

compucles
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason B

Ugh, no! That wasn’t just stupid. It was also an unnecessary injury hazard!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  compucles

Baseball has been slowly moving away from being a blood sport, it is true. You and Jason B may have different ideas of whether that’s a good thing.

Personally I’m more into weird cutouts and short porches and tall walls. But I never put that on a dating profile and you shouldn’t either.

docgooden85Member since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Alternatively, now that they have a better CF they can stop playing the world’s best RF in CF.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Counterpoint: Nah.

I’d rather the Yankees invest in LF defense than enable Bergman, Paredes…and even Volpe.

johansantana17Member since 2026
1 year ago

I love how often people call him Bergman. He deserves the disrespect.

CC AFCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

They already took monument park out of play, what more do you want? Jeez

wheelhouseMember since 2022
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

You’re taking only one consideration from this, the fielding (which the opponents also have to do). The deep left-center is a big part of their pitching strategy, which is to load up on left-handed starters.

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

No.

justahikerMember since 2021
1 year ago

Oh, indeed.

David Klein
1 year ago

Bellinger’s statcast page on the offensive end looks a lot like Verdugo’s does so there’s that. I’m not saying that he’ll be as bad as Verdugo was this past year, I think he’ll be at least league average. I would guess signing Walker could be next on the docket for the Yanks or trading for Nate Lowe I can’t see them signing Alonso to a long term deal but I’ve been wrong before.

boomstickMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

A Lowe trade is interesting, especially if the ranger front office uses it for removing salary to add Burnes to the rotation.

johndarc
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

From what I understand, Bellinger and Verdugo are similar in stats but Bellinger hits fewer ground balls and more fly balls. So he’s better than his stats.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

I think the one thing you can always predict with Bellinger is that you cannot predict anything. He will be very good, or very bad, or somewhere in the middle.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  carter

Seriously how many people have a 181 and a 43wrc on their record that wasn’t like a 30 at bat sample

ScoreboardMember since 2016
1 year ago

Surprised the Yankees needed to eat that much of the contract given little interest elsewhere… but to your point michael bellinger’s services were not available elsewhere so cubs could be patient.

MoateMember since 2022
1 year ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Rumor is that Toronto was kicking tires as well, and there’s no way, after being linked to him for weeks, the Yanks could stand to lose another player to a division rival.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think Dominguez needs to work on his routes in AAA. Too soon to give up on him as a center fielder, he needs reps.

They should get a couple more bats too. Their window is only as long as Judge, Fried, and Cole are healthy. Ideally another lefty power hitter who can take advantage of right field. Ben Rice is definitely more of an emergency option.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sure look – the real window ended with the massive salary cut after Game 7 of the ALCS.

The years since have effectively been different tones of surrender

John ChurchMember since 2020
1 year ago

They traded valuable resources (King, Thorpe, etc) for a year of Soto and made the World Series, where they were two bad innings from going back to LA up 3-2. That’s a heckuva tone of surrender.

wheelhouseMember since 2022
1 year ago
Reply to  John Church

Eyewash

ScoreboardMember since 2016
1 year ago

Should have posted in another article, but I’m here now… is Peraza now the solution at 2B/3B? Confused why everyone keeps talking about needing lefty bats when Wells and Jazz are already there. Is the rest of the lineup really that righty skewed?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

Cabrera or Peraza. The lineup isn’t unbalanced exactly but the lineup really only goes 6 or maybe 7 deep, and the benefits of having another left handed thumper in that stadium is huge.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If he goes full lefty Paredes, he’ll easily exceed the Hr projection.
And Yankee stadium isn’t the only AL park he can sneak “cheap” HRs in.

Pepper Martin
1 year ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

As of now, the Yankees’ lineup looks something like:

1: 3B/2B: Chisholm, L
2: RF: Judge, R
3: CF: Bellinger, L
4: DH: Stanton, R
5: C: Wells, L
6: LF: Dominguez, S
7: SS: Volpe, R
1B: Rice, L
2B/3B: ?????

This is definitely not a righty-heavy lineup. It’s also not really a bad lineup; here’s the Fangraphs projected wRC+ for each of those hitters this year:

Chisholm, 114
Judge, 170
Bellinger, 112
Stanton, 116
Wells, 107
Dominguez, 112
Volpe, 101
Rice, 114

I think Rice’s projection there is probably optimistic, but I’m sure the Yankees will pick up somebody to plug the hole in 1B. And I think Fangraphs is being unduly harsh with Dominguez. Dude just came off of Tommy John surgery and hit .314/.376/.504 as a 21 year old primarily at AAA. Fangraphs has him projected as .249/.326/.417, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised by something more like .275/.350/.480. Dude’s a stud.

JustinPBGMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Judge has done so well in the last 3 years that that 170 is now under his entire career average. So I’m taking the over on that one.

snakestl
1 year ago

“I have no idea if the Cubs’ savings will go back into the major league roster, or whether they’ll get shuffled into God knows what corner of the Ricketts family’s banking, real estate, and political empire. I hope, for the sake of Cubs fans and the country, that it’s the former.“

The best analysis you will find about this trade on any site, anywhere.

GoodEnoughForMeMember since 2024
1 year ago

I’m pretty down on Bellinger this year and not convinced he will be better than Grisham in terms of WAR/162. But given general injury concerns in their outfield, the fact that Cody can play 1B, and/or they can DH any one of these 4 if for some reason they wanted all of them in the lineup that day, and given this really only cost the Yankees money, than why not? Even if he’s just a league average player tops, this is a good outfield. I mean it’s missing Soto from last year and there’s no way to replace him, but that’s a group of outfielders to really like (mostly because of Judge, to be fair), and I still am in on Dominguez turning into a dang good player. Plus now Judge doesn’t have to play center. Really like this move for NY.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago

Same, dude.

GoatHerderMember since 2016
1 year ago

As a Cub fan I was expecting Bellinger to provide production somewhere between his 2023 (4.4 fWAR, 136 wRC+) and 2024 numbers (2.2 fWAR, 109 wRC+).

2024 was a weird year for him. Signed late so he didn’t have a normal off-season or spring training. Then he played through both a cracked rib and a broken finger. The broken finger limited him to just DHing for some time which suppressed his WAR. Also, Wrigley Field had a weird weather year that suppressed offense in general there. I would expect a 3 to 3.5 WAR season from him in Yankee stadium.

TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago

I will never understand these deals. The Braves never give these deals. Rarely even give much if anything in options, which are almost always team options. If I’m a team I’d much rather just give more money up front. These deals can just go south so easily.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

It’s a function of leverage.

When the Cubs signed Bellinger he was coming off a big rebound year and was in demand. The cubs had Armstrong coming so they hoped he did great and opted out. Instead he did okay and came back so they had to find a taker that needed him enough they wouldn’t have to eat much of the contract.

The yanks see a fit for his fielding and his bat and they can afford the deal.
If he succeeds he might opt out or he might stay. If he has a good year and opts out and Dominguez is ready, then no sweat. If Dominguez doesn’t develop and he stays, no change. If he leaves they’d be no worse off than yesterday.

He has the options last year’s leverage got him but the Yanks don’t care how he exercises them. Other teams would care. That’s why he’s a perfect fit for NYY but not Toronto.

John WickMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

Eh, hindsight is always 20/20. Bellinger wasn’t great last year, but he wasn’t awful either, and for the Cubs eating $5M isn’t that painful. It was a sensible signing IMO, just landed in the ‘meh’ end of possible outcomes.

Shirtless George Brett
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

I will never understand these deals. The Braves never give these deals.

Not every team can rely on their best players taking ridiculously undervalued, borderline agent malpractice, deals lol.

Last edited 1 year ago by Shirtless George Brett
JohnnyRingoFWC
1 year ago

I thought it would be better for the Cubs to hold Bellinger (after they got Tucker) if a great deal did not emerge.

If someone like a Busch goes down with injury, the backups are sparse currently.

And, I am not sure who you are going to sign that is better than Belli currently. Most of the free agent 3B’s are not much of an upgrade. There are no other spots open unless you move Suzuki or Hoerner as well.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnnyRingoFWC

Big money for a backup, though.
Again, it depends on how the use the money. Bring in a good starter? Trade for Arenado? Extend Tucker now?
It’s only a bad move is they don’t use the money on talent.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  JohnnyRingoFWC

I believe your fears are unfounded. This team has more position players ready to go than almost any other team out there. They already have three very good corner outfielders, another 2 or 3 outfielders in the minors, etc. Matt Shaw is ready to play somewhere. If anything, keeping Cody Bellinger and having him ride the bench has more downside as a clubhouse distraction than benefit.

JohnnyRingoFWC
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I hope my fears are indeed unfounded and they may be.

I would have moved Suzuki over Bellinger if I could and simply rotate the DH spot.

“Hopefully”, Matt Shaw is ready to play.

I noticed Neto made a fairly quick move up, had some struggles, but some real successes as well.

If the Cubs want insurance for Shaw, maybe one of those spare outfielders in the minors for Ryan McMahon and then this team looks a whole lot better.

It doesn’t block Shaw either, with Hoerner maybe being injured the first part of the year.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s fine as a salary dump if they can sign or trade for pitching. I sort of doubt they will though.

ismailadiemeMember since 2020
1 year ago

I’m glad you brought up the Great Cosmic Balance of Codys. Presumably that had been an obstacle in previous trade talks for Bellinger

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  ismailadieme

Cody Bradford idly kicks the dirt at his feet

sa1251Member since 2020
1 year ago

‘Effectively costing the Yankees 32.5M for one season’ … believe this would be 27.5 given the cubs sending 5M also

CC AFCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sa1251

I think that it’s only 2.5 per season, though. So the second 2.5 doesn’t kick in unless Bellinger doesn’t opt out.

GoatHerderMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I believe Cubs are contributing the second 2.5 regardless. It either goes towards the opt out payout or the 2026 salary.

dl80Member since 2026
1 year ago

I have assumed Bellinger’s rapid decline was the result of the shoulder injury in the 2020 World Series.

But his 2020 regular season wasn’t that great, either.

Is it possible he was just one of the biggest beneficiaries of the bouncy ball and that this is really what his underlying talent has always been?

The drop in hard hit % and average EV suggests more of the former, but I’m curious what others think.

biggestdummyMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  dl80

I don’t think its bouncy-ball.
Look at ISO and GB%
2017 .315/35.0% (ROY)
2018 .210/41.1%
2019 .324/31.5% (MVP)
2020 .216/39.8%

In his early great years he was pounding the ball into the bleachers. In his mediocre years, he was pounding the ball into the shift-adjusted 2nd baseman’s glove.

Then came the shoulder injury. 2021 shows the low ground-ball rate of 2019, but absolutely no power, and a huge jump in Ks .137/31.3% ISO/GB% with K-rate increasing from 17.3 to 26.9%.

Since 2022, his GB rate stabilizes at around 35%, but the power is strongly diminished.

My analysis is that we have two causes. Neither of which are bouncy-ball. 2017-2020 was approach-driven. The kinds of issues that are usually ironed out in the minors for hitters who don’t debut at age 21.

From 2022 forward, we see his approach stabilize, but the exceptional power has evaporated. It could be the ball – his power change does line up with the drag efficiency of balls going back up in 2020. But injury seems much more likely, given the huge gap between the promise of 2019 and what he’s delivering today. The gap is just too big to be explained by the flight of the ball being cut by 10 feet.

EstebanMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  biggestdummy

He went from 83% percentile in avg exit velo in 2019 to 60th percentile in 2020 to 48th in 2021 and he was 23rd in 2024.

Since everyone was playing with the juiced ball, I don’t think the juiced ball explains how high he was in avg exit velo in 2019. I do think his swing speed has gone down though, which does explain why doesn’t hit the ball hard anymore. Was that approach/swing changes/injury/a combo of the three?

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Esteban

He has a very odd swing. I don’t know how to describe it exactly except it reminds you or that kid in hs with the super long swing who strikes out a lot then randomly hits a few home runs off of hung curveballs

pmaguranMember since 2023
1 year ago

So the Cubs basically traded Bellinger, Paredes, Wesenski and Smith for Tucker.

cashgod27Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  pmaguran

More accurate to say Bellinger, Morel, Bigge, Johnson, Wesneski, and Smith for Tucker considering they gave up a lot to get Paredes last summer

averagejoe15Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  cashgod27

They really gave up almost nothing for Paredes. Morel was dreadful and even if he rebounds to 2023 numbers he’s a position-less bat with a big K problem.

The prospects were a 22 year old 40+FV and a 26 year old 40FV, both future relievers. Bigge looked good in the MLB after the trade but relievers are still hugely volatile.

And I don’t see why Belli gets looped in to the Tucker trade. They were trying to trade one of Belli and Suzuki well before the Tucker trade so it wasn’t a direct consequence and they could have chosen to act like a big market team and hold onto him if they wanted to. There would be plenty of ABs especially since PCA and Busch and still far from sure things with the bat.

treebeardedMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  pmaguran

For Tucker and $28 million.

pmaguranMember since 2023
1 year ago
Reply to  treebearded

Fair point, in that salary should be considered. Tucker will cost them $17m in 2025. Bellinger was going to cost them $27.5m in 2025. Since they are retaining $2.5, they’ve saved $8m. Probably a few million more when you factor in the other traded folks. I don’t think looking at 2026 savings makes sense, since they will have to pay up to keep Tucker.

MoateMember since 2022
1 year ago

I’ve seen a lot of “so the Cubs gave up *list of players that have been traded, non-tendered, DFA’d, whatever* for 1 year of Tucker” takes and I just need to say they’re stupid. It’s a stupid thought.

By this logic, every team trades all players dealt in *increment of time of the author’s choosing* for all players acquired during said increment, right? No, that’s not how we generally assess trades because it’s asinine? Then why has this been happening here?

/rant

pmaguranMember since 2023
1 year ago
Reply to  Moate

When the two trades/moves in question happen within days of each other and are directly related, i think it is reasonable to view them in combination. I think it is stupid to think otherwise.

Glevin
1 year ago

I think Bellinger will be pretty good with the Yankees. He’s going to love that RF porch. He isn’t very good though so makes sense for Cubs to get salary relief. Really, just a very unusual career. 24 WAR over 8 seasons but 15.5 were in first 3 seasons and 8.5 in last 5. I don’t know why every team doesn’t make their parks weird in some way. It’s such an advantage. Look at Houston and the Crawford boxes trading for Paredes. He’d have been good for 26 HRs last year there. In Baltimore, he would have had 6! Bellinger would have had 24 HRs in Yankee Stadium. Jays were also interested but he would have had 18 in Toronto. Make your park weird, get players that fit the park and you have an advantage.

johndarc
1 year ago
Reply to  Glevin

and the away games?

KennyMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Glevin

Exactly, this is the biggest reason the Rockies have been so dominant. /s

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Kenny

Make the park weird, but try not to change the elevation. You’ll never figure it out then.

johansantana17Member since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  Kenny

No combination of personnel in the Rockies front office has ever totaled more than 12 brain cells.

Last edited 1 year ago by johansantana17
dtpollittMember since 2016
1 year ago

If Ricketts allows Jed to spend the money saved from this deal, like to shore up the bullpen, then great. Based off Ricketts history, though, I doubt that happens, and bet Ricketts just pockets the savings.

Pepper Martin
1 year ago

Here’s money the Yankees have had come off the books since the end of the 2024 season:

Juan Soto: $31 million
Gleyber Torres: $14.2 million
Anthony Rizzo: $11 million ($6 million buyout of $17 million salary)
Josh Donaldson: $10 million buyout
Alex Verdugo: $9.2 million
Clay Holmes: $6 million
Tommy Kahnle: $5.75 million
Nestor Cortes: $3.95 million
John Berti: $3.6 million

There are a few other extraneous bits, but let’s call that $95 million. Since the end of the season, they’ve added:

Clay Bellinger, $27.5 million
Max Fried: $27.25 million
Devin Williams, $7.25 million

That’s $62 million.

So they could easily add another $25 million/ year player and, even with raises in arbitration, have a lower payroll than last year. They have about $25 million in payroll disappearing next year with no personnel changes (no more payments to Rizzo or Aaron Hicks, and the Marlins start kicking in $10 million / year towards Stanton’s salary), so they’ve got some payroll flexibility.

johansantana17Member since 2026
1 year ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

They’re definitely going to sign a 1B for around a $25m AAV. Pete Alonso might be a bit more, Christian Walker a bit less

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
1 year ago

Before this trade, the Yankees had Grisham and Dominguez in the OF to complement Judge. Good players, but no clear 4th OF. At 1B and 2B, they mostly had a bunch of relative unknowns. Though they did have Cabrera, who seemed to turn a corner in the second half, and can play either position. And they had Rice, who had some bad BABIP luck, but actually had a better xwOBA than Bellinger in 2024.

Based on that, I like Bellinger’s fit as a 1B/OF with the ability to cover center. It gives them a good option at both OF positions and 1B every day of the week, and in the very real chance that somebody doesn’t play as well as they hope, he can easily shift to where he’s needed.

Here’s the problem, though. Every one of those players is a lefty-dominant switch hitter, or a straight-up lefty. And the Yankees struggled against lefties this year. I would have liked to see them shore up at least one of these unsettled positions with a RHH who can mash lefties. Yandy Diaz would be a good example. Bellinger’s skill set fits the park, but I don’t think it complements well what they already have.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
1 year ago

Jazz’ flexibility helps a lot too. They can sign Bregman or trade for a third baseman and shift Jazz to second. I think signing Bregman actually makes a lot of sense for them.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
1 year ago

“It’s probably been an awkward few weeks for Cody Bellinger….”

About to get more awkward since he’s married to a woman that Giancarlo Stanton used to be with.

Last edited 1 year ago by airforce21one