Yu Darvish’s Futile Heroics
Yu Darvish’s 2018 could hardly have gone any worse. Fresh off of signing a six-year, $126 million contract with the Cubs, he made just eight starts before triceps tendinitis and a stress reaction in his right elbow ended his season. The Cubs made the playoffs, but Darvish could only watch their maddening 13-inning loss to the Rockies and wonder what could have been.
When Darvish struggled to start 2019, the situation seemed to go from frustrating to dire. His first eight starts were horrendous, rife with walks and home runs. He had been one of the most exciting pitchers in all of baseball, all strikeouts and gadget pitches, a highlight waiting to happen. He’d been a thrilling rookie, a prized deadline acquisition, and a top-tier free agent. Was he now on the downswing of his career, adding expensive journeyman to his list of accomplishments?
As it turns out, he wasn’t. As Devan Fink chronicled, Darvish turned his walk problems around, going from the pitcher with the most walks in baseball to the pitcher with the least. Since a disastrous outing in early May where he walked six Marlins, he’s been the third-best pitcher in baseball by xFIP, fourth-best by strikeout rate, and in the top 15 in WAR. In the second half, he’s been even better than that, combining a 37.2% strikeout rate with a 2.2% walk rate. His ERA, FIP, and xFIP are all in the mid-twos.
This fully actualized version of Darvish is what his flashes of brilliance through the years had always hinted at. The bottomless arsenal of pitches — he picked up Craig Kimbrel’s knuckle curve in a week — made him a delight to watch, the strikeouts coming from every conceivable angle, fastball following cutter following curve. The Cubs were off to a hot start, 22-13 even after Darvish’s disastrous turn against the Marlins, and now they were adding one of the best pitchers in baseball.
But while Darvish returned to form, the Cubs backslid. The team has gone 60-61 since that date, falling from the top of the division to nearly eliminated from postseason play. Darvish has made 23 starts in that time, and the team has gone 9-14 in those games. Wins and losses are no measure of pitcher quality, but Darvish has gone 4-5 over that timeframe. Even in the second half of the season, when Darvish went full supernova, the team was only 6-6 in his starts heading into this past Sunday.
That day came with a funereal aura for the Cubs. Their last home game of the year, and the last of organist Gary Pressy’s 33-year tenure at Wrigley Field, had almost no playoff implications. The Cardinals had already dealt a convincing blow to the team; our playoff odds only gave the Cubs a 9.4% chance of reaching the postseason. Javier Báez and Anthony Rizzo were hobbled, making appearances but clearly playing through injury. Rain fell throughout the game, driving fans away and making players miserable, and Kris Bryant went down with an injury in the day’s early stages.
And through it all, Darvish dealt. He was absolutely stellar through eight innings, striking out 12 without a walk, his third straight start of 12 or more strikeouts. His only blemish was a Paul DeJong home run, one of just four hits he allowed all day. The team clung to a one-run lead, their offense silenced nearly as much as St. Louis’s had been.
Darvish hadn’t thrown a pitch in the ninth inning since 2014, before his Tommy John surgery; he’d only gone as many as eight once this year. This day, though, he was out there. The Cubs bullpen had coughed up the lead each of the last three days. The relief corps had been strained all September; aside from Darvish’s own starts (six and seven innings the two games before this one), the Cubs only had three games all month where the starter finished six innings, and all three were six exactly.
So Darvish shouldered the burden. He stood in to face Jose Martinez, and Martinez hit the second-hardest ball Darvish had allowed all day:

On a rainy afternoon, it stayed in the park. In fact, it traveled 386 feet and hung in the air for roughly five seconds. On another day, it might have been a hard-hit ball that found a glove. Sunday, though, was not the Cubs’ day. Albert Almora Jr., into the game as a defensive replacement, misread the ball, breaking in rather than out with his first step, as you can see from my sketchy camerawork:
That tiny hesitation turned a makeable play into an incredibly difficult one, and the ball kicked off of Almora’s glove and off the wall, giving the lumbering Martinez his first triple in more than two years.
From there, the result felt preordained. A sacrifice fly plated the tying run, a softly hit flare found right field, and a groundball off the bat of Paul Goldschmidt stayed fair down the third base line to put the Cardinals ahead for good. Darvish could only scream in frustration:
Afterward, Darvish trashed his locker. He called the loss the worst of his life, still visibly upset as he gave postgame interviews. In truth, Chicago’s season was doomed before the game even started, but try telling that to the pitcher who spent three hours attempting to will his team to victory, even as it crumbled around him.
This season, Darvish faced the Cardinals, Chicago’s longtime nemesis, four times. The team went 1-3 in those games; this being baseball, he had a 2.66 ERA in the losses and an 11.25 ERA in the victory. That futility is Darvish’s season in miniature. He was great, unequivocally great, for months on end as the team labored to secure a playoff spot. He was the best pitcher on a team full of former All-Stars down the stretch, punching the clock while Kyle Hendricks struggled with injury and Jon Lester, José Quintana, and Cole Hamels scuffled.
In another universe, Sunday might have been Darvish’s crowning moment. Somewhere, Almora caught Martinez’s line drive and Edman’s flare was hit ever so slightly differently, leading to a routine fly out. Somewhere, he went the full nine, and his magisterial complete game on the back of two Craig Kimbrel saves sank the Cardinals. Somewhere, Darvish’s tremendous second half put the team on his back and led them to the playoffs, giving him another chance to exorcise the demons of 2017. But not here. Here, Darvish could only slam his cleats into his locker and brood.
Darvish has a chance to opt out of his contract after this year. He has $81 million remaining over four years, likely more than he would command on the open market as a 33-year-old starter, but stranger things have happened in the world of player contracts. My guess, though, is that he’ll be back next year, regardless of what the financial situation is. This was supposed to be his shot at redemption, a season with Darvish still near his peak where he could take one more crack at the World Series.
Next year will have to do, because Darvish isn’t getting any younger, and the Cubs’ core isn’t suddenly adding players out of nowhere. There’s something deeply unfair about that reality, though, something I can’t quite put my finger on. Yu Darvish, the man of a thousand pitches, should be pitching in meaningful games. He should be entertaining the masses, throwing a pitch he learned three days ago in pressure-packed spots in front of huge audiences. Instead, he’s standing in the rain. We only get one universe in which to watch Darvish. Here’s hoping next year presents us with a different one.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
so he’s got an opt out after this season. Any chance that he takes that? He’s got 4 years/81 million left on his deal.
I’ll just assume you are being facetious. He turns 34 next year. He has history of injury trouble and up and down results.
he’d be the #2/3 starter on the market behind only Cole and Strasburg. Think he could get at least 4/81 from someone should he want to leave. It definitely wouldn’t be the strangest thing in the world if he opts out.
He’s in a worse spot than Dallas Keuchel was last year in terms of both age and performance, with at least two better options on the market than anyone last year (Cole and Strasburg). He’s a year removed from a season when he was totally ineffective. There are multiple other players beyond Strasburg/Cole on the free agent market who are likely better, including Ryu, Wheeler (who is younger), and Bumgarner (who is younger). If people miss out on Darvish and all those other options but only need rotation depth, they’d probably be happy with Odorizzi (who is younger and has put up a far better season, although I am not sure how sustainable that performance is), Gibson, Hamels, Roark and Miley. Nobody is giving him that contract on the free agent market and any agent giving him advice to opt out should be fired for incompetence.
Plus the hot stove environment of the last two years, which he himself experienced.
I understand the cautionary comments on this point, but if my Twins were to sign him for 4yrs / $100MM – perhaps with one of those $1MM team options on the backend as injury protection – I would support it. I wouldn’t bet on Darvish opting out, but it’s far from inconceivable.
Darvish has found another gear. No pitcher on the cubs is an ace, has ever been considered an ace, or has ever pitched like an ace in past seasons. 2 of them are paid like aces. Darvish might have found something the last few months that could make him creep into ace talk next year if he keeps it up. It’ll be interesting to watch this $140M pitching staff next year, all a year older. They’ll need Darvish to be every bit of this potential ace.
Since the start of last season, Kyle Hendricks is 16th in fWAR and 13th in RA9-WAR. Obviously people’s definitions of an ace vary but Hendricks has absolutely had stretches where he’s pitched like one.
Yeah, this obviously depends on what an “ace” is. I think he means a “league ace,” which I would define as a guy who gives you 5 or more wins.
I do like Hendricks though. He’s good at his job, and clearly the best pitcher on the Cubs over the last few years.
Yea, I meant this stretch of a Darvish might be the beginnings of an actual Ace breakout. Hendricks or Lester are nice pitchers but they aren’t in the conversation. Not taking away from them, but doubtful they are or were or ever will be considered top tier guys.
Darvish MIGHT be knocking on that door. Should be one of the better Chicago storylines next year- Darvish & Giolito trying to enter Ace Club.
Lester had a couple of years that in retrospect we could call ace-level seasons, but none in the last 4 years. Darvish has had some stretches of ace-level performance–that abbreviated 2016 would seem to qualify–but never over a full 200-inning season, and it’s not unusual for pitchers who are a notch below ace status to have ace-level performance over 50-100 innings. I don’t necessarily see why he would suddenly “break through” now, when he’s older, more fragile, and has battled several instances of inconsistency recently.
I can agree with all of this as well.
I agree. Hendricks is a solid #2 or a very good #3 but nowhere near an ace. The lack of strikeouts means it’s hard for him to dominate like a true ace. He tends to have fewer blowups, though, which even aces have sometimes. So you are getting consistently good with few great and few terrible starts.
There was some talk of him limiting his pitch selection. Hopefully that carries over. But Darvish’s problem was/is the long ball, 4th worse HR rate among qualified starters. He gave up 14 HR over that stretch you’re talking about. Juiced ball + Wrigley when the wind is blowing out + being a fly ball pitcher = ugly losses.
Is this sad Cubs week or something? It’s totally justified but it’s just…interesting? Surprising? To find quite so many articles on the demise of the Cubs.
Good thing for Chicago natives that the Bears are looking strong early in their 2019 campaign. I’m already seeing diehards jump ship on the MLB season and move on to the NFL season to remove the sting.
Agreed. I’d actually like to see a full analysis that shows just how much money they’ve spent and the position it’s put them in. I don’t have the exact numbers in front of me, but I know they’ve laid out almost a billion in contracts to win the World Series and try to sustain it. How does that compare to the Astros for example.
“Worst of his life” hmm as a Dodger fan there’s another loss of his life that seems to be worse
I find the narrative of Darvish trashing his locker means that he is a great competitor to be very strange. I guess some believe that throwing a tantrum because you got beaten is admirable.
There’s a right way and a wrong way to do it. He didn’t lose control and he didn’t hurt anybody, so you like seeing that his heart is really in it.
What about guys that punch walls and break their hand? They also didn’t hurt anybody else.
Yeah but they hurt themselves which is stupid af.
You can’t expect someone to be stoic when they lost 4 1 run games in a row and blew a lead after throwing a gem like Darvish did there
Punching a wall is self-destructive, which counts as hurting somebody and out of control.
Trashing your locker could also be considered “out of control,” though. He may have just gotten lucky that he didn’t hurt himself in the process.
Did you add the word “else” to make a false comparison?
Is the “right way to trash a locker” a subset of the old school rules of the “right way to play the game?”
Really good writing, Ben. I actually found myself feeling for the people you wrote about.