Atlanta’s Pitching Injuries Keep Piling Up

Max Fried
Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports

Bad injury news for a member of your rotation is always unwelcome, so the Braves had a very unhappy Wednesday, with two starting pitchers hitting the IL to go along with a loss in their series closer with the Red Sox.

In Atlanta’s current era of success since its last rebuild, there’s no pitcher that has been more crucial to the team’s fortunes than Max Fried. Since his debut in 2017, he has amassed 14.4 WAR, more than double that of any other pitcher on the roster (next up is Charlie Morton at 6.5). He’s already missed time this season due to an injury, a hamstring strain that cost him two weeks in April. The current injury, however, is far more serious, one that will measure in months rather than days or weeks.

A forearm strain is usually enough to cause serious and forlorn eyebrow-raising, but the silver lining here is that the MRI on Fried’s elbow didn’t reveal an injury severe enough to require surgery. This is especially important given that he already had Tommy John surgery back when he was a prospect with the Padres. That previous procedure cost him part of 2014 and all of ’15, and the basic truth is that though medicine has made progress and that Tommy John surgeries aren’t career-enders to the degree they used to be, repeat procedures have considerably less success. In this 2016 study of so-called revision Tommy John surgery, less than half of the pitchers looked at even pitched in 10 major league games afterward, and they saw their average career length drop in half compared to first-time patients.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

If losing Fried wasn’t enough, Kyle Wright was pulled from his last start in the third inning due to shoulder pain and will also miss an indeterminate amount of time with a shoulder strain. It’s his second shoulder issue this season, and all indications are that this one may leave him out for even longer than Fried.

Generally speaking, I haven’t known pitchers to give bearish analyses of their own health unless something is very wrong.

After Wright’s breakout 2022, he clearly hasn’t been sharp at the same level this season. His walk rate, a problem in the majors he finally appear to conquer last year, has ballooned in his five starts; his velocity was down; and the exit velocity against him went up.

Replacing either one of Fried or Wright in the short term will be very difficult. President of baseball operations Alex Anthopoulos quickly threw cold water on the idea that a trade to remedy the situation is imminent or even likely to happen:

“Trade season doesn’t really begin until the All-Star break so trades aren’t likely,” Alex Anthopoulos told The Athletic Wednesday. “Of course, everyone still stays engaged, but realistically there’s a reason almost all deals get done around the trade deadline.”

Does he feel any level of urgency to add to the rotation, given the circumstances?

“It’s hard to answer it that way,” he said. “I just know before July 31 you’re always likely to look internally. That’s for all teams, so whenever we have performance or injury issues early, we always follow the same process.”

It’s not difficult to understand why Anthopoulos is shooting down the idea of a quick trade. It’s highly accurate to say that teams rarely trade excellent starters at this point of the season for any reason. In our current playoff probabilities, only seven teams project with less than a 20% chance of making the playoffs. Of these seven, most have already been stripped bare of most of their pitching: Colorado’s best pitcher is out for the season, and Washington, Oakland, Cincinnati, and Kansas City are devoid of any interesting veteran starters. (I’m guessing the Nationals would be happily willing to trade Patrick Corbin, but unless science discovers that throwing crushable sliders is the greatest medical breakthrough of the 21st century, I would not recommend that.) That basically leaves the Tigers and White Sox. Eduardo Rodriguez would be an interesting acquisition for someone — he’s only allowed nine runs across eight starts — but he’s signed to a long deal, and Detroit may not be motivated to trade him. You could see Chicago start to sell if the team doesn’t surge into relevance, but probably not until later this summer.

The further problem in making a trade is that Atlanta doesn’t have as much to offer other teams as it used to. The farm system has been incredibly productive over the last six or seven years, but graduations, trades, and time have emptied out the larder. Not a single Braves prospect made our Top 100 list this year, and ZiPS was no more optimistic, with no Braves in its top 100 and only a single player in its top 200 (Jared Shuster). If the Tigers suddenly made it known they were shopping Rodriguez, teams like the Orioles or Cardinals could more easily put together a winning package for his services.

But there’s good news! Well, sort of. Even with our depth charts now reflecting significant time missed due to injury, ZiPS and Steamer still combine to rank the Braves sixth in baseball in starting pitching. Spencer Strider seems likely to end up in the Cy Young award picture this fall, Morton has pitched well (though his strikeout drop is concerning), and Bryce Elder, though far less explosive than either, has been quietly competent; we can feel more confidence in his contribution than we did at the start of the season. Michael Soroka could conceivably return to the majors this year, and the projection systems, while not enthralled with either, see both Shuster and Dylan Dodd as safely above replacement level.

Perhaps most crucially, the Braves have been fortunate in their enemies this year. While the Mets were largely expected to put up a serious fight against the Braves, they’ve had their own pitching injuries/woes and are currently just trying to get over the .500 mark. The Phillies have had struggles of their own, and the Marlins’ offense looks like it could get shutout in a tee-ball game. A 6 1/2-game lead is hardly an impregnable barrier for an also-ran, but it’s also a fairly comfortable cushion for this point in the season. Assuming two months for Fried and three months for Wright, the ZiPS projections still paint a rosy picture for Atlanta:

ZiPS Projected Standings – NL East (5/11)
Team W L GB Pct Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win% Worst Tm
Atlanta Braves 97 65 .599 77.6% 18.5% 96.1% 15.8% 0.0%
New York Mets 89 73 8 .549 17.1% 51.1% 68.2% 6.8% 0.0%
Philadelphia Phillies 83 79 14 .512 4.7% 31.8% 36.5% 1.8% 0.0%
Miami Marlins 76 86 21 .469 0.5% 8.6% 9.1% 0.2% 0.4%
Washington Nationals 66 96 31 .407 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 12.6%

Even with the losses due to injury, which also include Ian Anderson, who underwent Tommy John surgery in April, there have been enough improvements elsewhere that ZiPS sees Atlanta’s current rest-of-season roster to be only six points of winning percentage weaker than the squad that started the 2023 season (.578 versus .584). Over a 162-game season, that only amounts to one win, and since those preseason projections, the team’s most dangerous divisional rival, the Mets, have lost nine points of projected roster strength. The net result is that the Braves project, at least by ZiPS’ reckoning, at a much higher probability of winning the division now (77.6%) compared to March (52.3%).

Just how effective is Atlanta’s cushion? To gauge this, I asked ZiPS the inverse question: how little do you have to like the Braves’ roster before their divisional playoff probability drops below preseason levels? In this case, it takes dropping them all the way from .578 to .527, the latter a mere 85-win pace over 162 games. In other words, even if you think the computers are being optimistic or you expect some additional misfortune, that’s a pretty big buffer Atlanta has. Losing Fried and Wright for the year — which has not yet been discussed as a possibility — still leaves the Braves as heavy divisional favorites without a trade (64.4%). The Twins currently have the best divisional probability of any team that’s not the Braves, at 63.1%

The Braves faced some bad news yesterday, but this is a well-constructed team with a healthy lead in the division. To send Atlanta on vacation in October will likely require a lot more disasters than these two unwelcome losses.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brian ReinhartMember since 2016
3 years ago

Eduardo Rodriguez does have an opt-out available after this season; if he walks, he’d be leaving on the table a guarantee of 3/49 (18M in 24, 16M in 25, 15M in 26). We could probably have a fun different conversation about that; I’d guess that at his age and with the season he’s having, he’d be able to beat 3/49 in free agency and join a contender, too.

johndarc
3 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

E-Rod will get traded to the Braves, sign a long term team friendly extension, and donate 1 percent of his salary to charity.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

For a bit I thought people were talking about a different Eduardo Rodriguez but nope, it’s the former red sock. I think he would be great on any contender, and he’ll get more than he’s getting if he walks, so there will probably be a trade. The braves have essentially nothing to offer though (Grissom maybe?).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

I don’t have a clue how other front offices would see Grissom right now. If I were the Tigers (or A’s, or Royals, etc) I would at least see if he could handle third base. His stats in AAA are pretty good, and he was fine offensively for most of last year. But a guy who was last seen in the majors failing at every part of the game isn’t usually on a team’s wish list.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oakland would have just such guys on their wish list

Alex RemingtonMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Unless you are a fantasy owner drafting Jarred Kelenic for the fourth straight year…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Remember, we’re living in the age of Taijuan Walker and Jameson Taillon getting deals that comfortably beat what E-Rod has, and like them he won’t have a QO because he already got one last time he was in FA. So unless he gets hurt or gets the yips, his floor if he opts out is at least $18M per for at least 4 years. I’m guessing he’s probably looking at a deal more like 5 years and $20M.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Brian Reinhart

Yes and the Cardinals would have start playing a lot better to even want to trade for a rental. Of course Andrew Knizner could save them.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ivan_Grushenko
lavarnway
3 years ago

It sucks, but injuries happen. Time for some guys to step up!

Jewish PacheMember since 2020
3 years ago

Thoughts on Lance Lynn? He’s been terrible by almost any measure this year, but he’s still striking a ton of people out, just that he’s also walking a ton of people plus the lowest strand rate and highest BABIP of his career. Not to mention the (hopefully) unsustainable HR/FB rate. He might be cooked but 1) I imagine the main acquisition cost would be his salary and 2) I don’t trust White Sox coaching to do literally anything right, so maybe he can be fixed?

Don’t think the Braves need to make a move right now but one more injury and they’re really running out of options

Last edited 3 years ago by Jewish Pache
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

Maybe; ZiPS thinks he’s good for 1.6 WAR over 108 innings, which is effectively on the border of being a #3/#4 starter. He’s certainly a more realistic target given that his contract is probably underwater and the Braves don’t have anything to trade. That’s probably as good as you’re going to get when you’ve traded away every prospect who could conceivably be on a Top 100 list.

Jewish PacheMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah his main appeal right now is his ability to actually be traded for, which might not be the best reason to trade for someone lol. But with another injury they’ll need someone to eat the innings, and I’m going to go crazy if I see another Braves fan suggest signing MadBum to try and fix him

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

I would definitely agree that fixing Lance Lynn seems like a much more realistic goal than fixing Madison Bumgarner.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Ugh. Mad Bum is exactly who we’re going to sign. Calling it now.

scotman144Member since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

Lynn also started out 2022 in similar fashion getting lit up per babip and HR/FB in the first ~half of the season. He righted the ship to the tune of a 3.99/3.82/3.49 full season pitching triple slash with a dominant second half. He’s down 1.5mph on the four seamer since 2021 but putting up an identical xFIP (3.85 vs 3.82). I am still cautiously optimistic that’s he’s far from toast.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Yeah, the Braves are lucky that the entire Mets’ rotation started to get hurt or pitch like they were their actual chronological ages. Everything else has been expected. But it seems awfully unlikely that all of the Mets, Phillies, and Marlins will just let them run away with it.

The Braves are also are a bit lucky that pretty much every player who even remotely disappointed last season has been hitting very well (and in Sean Murphy’s case, he’s probably having the best couple months of his career). But the team is so deep wasn’t crazy to think they would have the third best offense in MLB anyway.

hughduffy
3 years ago

Going into Spring Training, the Braves had

  1. Max Fried
  2. Spencer Strider
  3. Kyle Wright
  4. Charlie Morton

as a solid top four of the rotation. The question was who was going to be the fifth starter? They had a solid group to choose from:

  • Bryce Elder
  • Ian Anderson
  • Michael Soroka
  • Kolby Allard

They also had two prospects aiming for the fifth starting spot in Spring Training:

  • Jared Shuster
  • Dylan Dodd

Kolby Allard was the first to fall with a grade 2 oblique strain. Earliest return is June.
Ian Anderson went under TJ surgery in the first half of April.

So now, the rotation looks something like:

  1. Spencer Strider
  2. Charlie Morton
  3. Bryce Elder (he can’t keep getting away with it!)
  4. ???
  5. ???

I’ll always be rooting for Michael Soroka’s success, but his numbers in AAA aren’t great. I’d still love to see him starting in Toronto, even as rusty as he is right now.
Dylan Dodd has looked ok, but not great at the major league level.
Jared Shuster seems like he has command issues, because he’s walking way too many people in his MLB and AAA starts.

The Braves had 10 starters lined up for the 2023 season, and it may not be enough.
You can never have enough depth.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
3 years ago

Sean Manaea and Alex Wood might be fixable. Wood isn’t that broken. Jack Flaherty is probably gettable and possibly fixable.

nobleisthynameMember since 2019
3 years ago

Not really relevant to the main discussion, but I noticed the last column for the ZiPS projected standings gives the Nationals a 12.6% chance of getting the #1 overall pick. Is this just saying they have a 12.6% chance of ending the season with the worst record? Because I’m pretty sure under the new draft lottery rules they have a 0% chance at the first overall pick since they pick second this year.

O'KieboomerMember since 2021
3 years ago

Time to write the almost the same article for the Rays, except the division doesn’t suck.