Christian Yelich Cashes In
Christian Yelich has emerged as one of the game’s elite players while playing under a very club-friendly contract. Now it appears as though the Brewers’ right fielder will be paid like the superstar he’s become, even while staying put in the game’s smallest market. According to The Athletic‘s Ken Rosenthal (with a substantial assist from the New York Post’s Joel Sherman), the Brewers and Yelich are nearing agreement on an extension that will cover nine years and be worth around $215 million, with a mutual option for a 10th year.
Yelich won NL MVP honors in 2018 while leading the Brewers to a division title and helping them come within one win of a trip to the World Series. He hit .326/.402/.598 with 36 homers and league bests in batting average, slugging percentage, wRC+ (166) and WAR (7.6), then followed that up with another MVP-caliber campaign that featured even better numbers, including a slash-stat Triple Crown (.329/.429/.671), 44 homers, and again league bests in both wRC+ (174) and WAR (7.8). Alas, on September 10, he fracture his right kneecap by fouling a pitch off of it (OUCH), ending his season and, as it turned out, his MVP hopes; he finished second to Cody Bellinger, over whom he had a slight statistical advantage at the time of the injury.
Including his 2016 and ’17 seasons, which were worth a combined 10.0 WAR, Yelich has been the majors’ third-most valuable player over the past four years. You can probably guess who’s first and second:
| Rk | Player | Team | PA | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Trout | Angels | 2396 | 180 | 34.9 |
| 2 | Mookie Betts | Red Sox | 2762 | 139 | 30.7 |
| 3 | Christian Yelich | Marlins/Brewers | 2585 | 147 | 25.4 |
| 4 | Anthony Rendon | Nationals | 2495 | 136 | 24.2 |
| 5 | Francisco Lindor | Indians | 2806 | 118 | 23.2 |
| 6 | José Altuve | Astros | 2526 | 147 | 22.8 |
| 7 | Jose Ramirez | Indians | 2503 | 130 | 22.6 |
| 8 | Nolan Arenado | Rockies | 2711 | 129 | 22.4 |
| 9 | Kris Bryant | Cubs | 2455 | 140 | 21.7 |
| 10 | Alex Bregman | Astros | 2238 | 146 | 20.5 |
Trout (12 years, $426.5 million), Arenado (eight years, $260 million), and Rendon (seven years, $245 million) have all cashed in via monster contracts, and all signs point to Betts doing so this coming winter, with Lindor and Bryant two seasons away from their big paydays. Yelich, despite his standing among that group, will be paid more money than most of us will ever see, but he’s going to fall significantly short of that upper tier due to timing and his own choices, both in the past and present. The 28-year-old slugger is currently working under a seven-year $49.57 million contract that he signed in March 2015, just before he began his third major league season with the Marlins. That contract bought out his first two years of free agency at a considerable discount; instead of signing a deal this past winter that might have surpassed $300 million, he’s receiving a modest $12.5 million this year, with $14 million in 2021. Those two years will be rolled into the new contract, added to seven additional years (2022-28) worth about $188.5 million (just shy of $27 million annually), with the mutual option for an undisclosed amount covering the 2029 season, his age-37 campaign. An unspecified amount of the money is deferred.
Via Dan Szymborski, here’s Yelich’s ZiPS forecast for the guaranteed period of the deal:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | .303 | .395 | .571 | 564 | 104 | 171 | 35 | 4 | 36 | 111 | 81 | 136 | 25 | 149 | 1 | 6.1 |
| 2021 | .301 | .393 | .568 | 544 | 100 | 164 | 35 | 4 | 34 | 107 | 78 | 128 | 21 | 148 | 1 | 5.7 |
| 2022 | .302 | .393 | .569 | 527 | 96 | 159 | 34 | 4 | 33 | 103 | 76 | 123 | 20 | 149 | 1 | 5.4 |
| 2023 | .299 | .389 | .559 | 512 | 91 | 153 | 32 | 4 | 31 | 98 | 72 | 117 | 18 | 145 | 0 | 5.0 |
| 2024 | .294 | .382 | .542 | 493 | 84 | 145 | 30 | 4 | 28 | 92 | 66 | 111 | 16 | 139 | 0 | 4.3 |
| 2025 | .291 | .378 | .523 | 470 | 78 | 137 | 28 | 3 | 25 | 83 | 61 | 102 | 13 | 133 | -1 | 3.6 |
| 2026 | .287 | .368 | .504 | 446 | 70 | 128 | 25 | 3 | 22 | 74 | 54 | 91 | 11 | 126 | -1 | 2.8 |
| 2027 | .282 | .359 | .477 | 419 | 61 | 118 | 22 | 3 | 18 | 64 | 47 | 81 | 9 | 117 | -2 | 2.0 |
| 2028 | .275 | .346 | .445 | 389 | 53 | 107 | 18 | 3 | 14 | 55 | 39 | 69 | 8 | 106 | -3 | 1.1 |
Per Szymborski, at $7.5 million per win plus 5% inflation — a set of assumptions that doesn’t exactly jibe with what we’ve seen over the past three winters but probably works better over a longer period of time — that contract would be worth $315 million over nine years if Yelich were a free agent right now, a honking $100 million more than he’ll actually make. Even so, much of his performance value is up front, during the two low-cost years that are being carried over. ZiPS figures that the seven years starting in 2022 are worth $225 million, which is still $36.5 million more than he’s being paid for that period.
Obviously, that’s a considerable difference, and from one vantage, it looks as though Yelich got hosed, or at the very least granted the Brewers a steep hometown discount — which would be his prerogative, as he’s clearly happy in Cream City. As he told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel’s Todd Rosiak last September, “I really enjoy this city and it’s somewhere that I’m very passionate about. It’s somewhere that, if I were to finish my career here, I would not mind that at all.”
Fair enough, but before you slap your forehead at his leaving so much money on the table, consider that if Yelich had played through his current deal, including the $15 million club option the Brewers held on his services in 2022, he would have reached free agency as he entered his age-31 season. The free agent market simply hasn’t been as hospitable to such geezers of late; here are the top contracts signed by free agent position players entering their age-31 seasons or later over the past five winters:
| Player | Team | Signed | Age | Years | $ (Millions) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoenis Céspedes | Mets | 2017 | 31 | 4 | 110.0 |
| Josh Donaldson | Twins | 2020 | 34 | 4 | 92.0 |
| Dexter Fowler | Cardinals | 2017 | 31 | 5 | 82.5 |
| Lorenzo Cain | Brewers | 2018 | 32 | 5 | 80.0 |
| Yasmani Grandal | White Sox | 2020 | 31 | 4 | 73.0 |
| Alex Gordon | Royals | 2016 | 32 | 4 | 72.0 |
| Ian Desmond | Rockies | 2017 | 31 | 5 | 70.0 |
| Mike Moustakas | Reds | 2020 | 31 | 4 | 64.0 |
| Justin Turner | Dodgers | 2017 | 32 | 4 | 64.0 |
| A.J. Pollock | Dodgers | 2019 | 31 | 5 | 60.0 |
| Carlos Santana | Phillies | 2018 | 32 | 3 | 60.0 |
| Edwin Encarnación | Indians | 2017 | 34 | 3 | 60.0 |
Just four of those deals were worth $80 million or more, and just one topped $100 million; meanwhile, just four (those of Céspedes, Donaldson, Encarnación, and Santana) had an average annual value of at least $20 million, with only one topping $25 million. It’s true that Donaldson might be the only player from the above group in Yelich’s class, as he also won an MVP award and has three seasons of at least 7.0 WAR under his belt to Yelich’s two, but he didn’t hit free agency until he was older and had been through the injury wringer, losing about a full season during the 2017-18 span. It’s the younger players hitting free agency — or approaching it and choosing to forgo it via massive extensions — who are getting paid the biggest bucks, and because of his previous deal, this might the best Yelich can do without missing that boat entirely.
Yelich’s situation isn’t unlike those of Altuve or Chris Sale, whose club-friendly contracts from early in their careers gave them security but prevented them from free agent paydays on the $200 million tier. Altuve signed a four-year, $12.5 million deal with two additional club options in mid-2013, his second full season, then signed a seven-year, $163.5 million extension in March 2018, one that converted those meager club options ($6 million and $6.5 million for 2018 and ’19) into guaranteed years sweetened by a $21 million signing bonus. Sale signed a five-year, $32.5 million deal with a pair of club options in 2013, the middle of his third full season. He played it all the way through while making $28.5 million in 2018-19, and is now working under a five-year, $145 million extension he signed last March.
From the Brewers’ side, this is an impressive investment that helps to offset a significant cutback in the current payroll, which per our RosterResource payroll pages is down $25 million from last year (from $134 million to $109 million). It’s made possible by the fact that the team has very little in the way of salary commitments beyond 2021. Ryan Braun‘s five-year, $105 million deal and its $15 million mutual option for 2021 will be off the books, leaving Cain’s $18 million salary for ’22 (the final one of his five-year deal), a $12 million club option (which can vest into a mutual option) on Avisaíl García, and a guaranteed $2.75 million (plus incentives) for Josh Lindblom the only deals in place besides the as-yet-unspecified balance of Freddy Peralta’s new five-year, $15.5 million extension.
Exactly whom the Brewers plan to surround Yelich with besides Keston Hiura and Luis Urias (both arbitration-eligible starting in 2023) remains to be seen, particularly with a farm system that ranked second-to-last in future value as of late last season, and last in the eyes of both Baseball America and The Athletic’s Keith Law this spring. Eric Longenhagen’s Brewers list is forthcoming, but Milwaukee only placed one prospect, Brice Turang, on our 2020 Top 100 (Turang checked in at 104). Yet the team has been reliably competitive in recent years while drawing well in terms of attendance (fifth in the NL last year at 2.9 million, sixth in the previous two seasons), and owner Mark Attanasio and president of baseball operations David Stearns have earned the benefit of the doubt when it comes to building a roster, at least in the eyes of their biggest star. Can Milwaukee contend while one player occupies 15-20% of their payroll, which given a $27 million salary would mean $135 million to $180 million for a team that according to Cot’s Contacts set a record last year with a $122.5 million Opening Day payroll? We’re going to find out.
There’s certainly a compare-and-contrast exercise to be done between the Brewers and Yelich versus the Indians and Lindor, whose situation Craig Edwards examined last week. Like the Brewers, the Indians have a creative front office and a recent history of contending, but they play in a larger market, yet don’t draw as well, and wind up with a similar estimated revenue according to Forbes. Against that backdrop, the shortstop made the choice to go year-to-year through his arbitration eligibility, and between that and the arrival of his free agency following his age-27 season, he’s set up for a much bigger haul than Yelich is getting, one that will likely mean his departure.
Different teams, different players, different circumstances. Timing is everything when it comes to getting the biggest contracts, and for Yelich, the stars did not align in a way that made that possible. That he and the Brewers have found a middle ground that works for both sides makes for a feel-good story, and while it’s not a situation that fits every top-tier player, we can be happy that it works for him.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
I’d use Rendon’s 7/$245M as the relevant comp. Rendon signed starting in his age 29 season, so with Yelich’s extension of $188M starting in his age 31 season, I’d use 5/$175M or $35M aav. If Yelich gives the Brewers a 50% discount in 2020 $ for his age 36-37 seasons, we could add in $35M more for a total of $210M. Thus, I think Yelich is leaving $22M on the table plus, say, another $20M or so with no opt-outs. I think the MLBPA would probably have wanted him to bargain harder so as not to leave the $40M-ish on the table.
Great deal for the Brewers, a sign that a small market team can get a superstar to give them a hometown discount.
Except that Yelich is unlikely to put up a 7-win season in his walk year (plus being a year older, as pointed out in the article). If he puts up 5.4 wins in his walk year, he’s still getting paid a huge sum of money but you’re looking at something between Chris Davis’s deal (adjusted for inflation) and Rendon’s contract. He’d be about the same age as both of them, and Yelich would be more consistent than Davis had been but with a similar walk year, and similar level of consistency to Rendon but a worse walk year.
Fair point, though his projection is 5.0 for his age 31 season which is not far off from Rendon’s 5.3-5.6 WAR for the coming season. He’s still leaving $15-$20M on the table by not taking opt-outs.
Rendon is actually a great comp, although we’re missing the contract is only ’23 thru ’28 of new years ($173.5mm).
For first 3 years of respective contracts, Yelich (ZIPS) projects to be better than Rendon.
What a great day to be a Brewer fan. I have a 4 year old and a 1 year old who now get to have the formative years of their baseball fandom formed by watching Christian Yelich play for the Milwaukee Brewers. Awesome!
This is honestly a really good deal for Yelich. It’s not that bad for the Brewers (looks like it could be a win-win?), but in terms of his production, there is nowhere to go but down, so Yelich was wise to strike a deal now. His leverage was hurt by the fact that he had a bunch of years of cheap team control left but he signed at the absolute peak of his performance, and that’s awfully good for him.
I think the play here from the Brewers’ front office, based on this offseason, is:
1) Stop trading prospects for veterans
2) Try to moneyball it with short-term stop-gaps
3) Hope that, along with Yelich’s production, is enough to keep the team respectable for the next however many years, and that Yelich himself is a draw.
4) Hope that someday, the Brewers have enough homegrown guys to either form the core of the next top team or to trade for veterans to make an actual run.
Whether #4 is going to happen before or after Yelich loses his luster…I’m not super optimistic about it since most of their hitting prospects have serious strikeout problems, so most of the help on the position player side is probably going to come from guys who aren’t currently in the organization already. But it does seem to give a pretty good look at what the playbook is going to be, and if they develop the pitchers well it’s possible?
I think that’s why it’s kind of a questionable deal for the Brewers. I don’t know that they have a path to contention. They are unlikely to keep shelling out big bucks for free agents and don’t have much to hope for in the minor leagues. I can easily see them trying to trade Yelich and start a rebuild in two or three years, but there won’t be all that much surplus value on the contract the and it will be more of a salary dump.
Don’t get me wrong, I always think it is good for teams to hold on to and pay great players, I’m just not sure the Brewers have an overarching strategy here other than retaining a few stars and trying to get lucky with the rest of the roster. That usually doesn’t work.
Gents, the OF is now secure for the next 3 years (Yelich, Cain, Garcia, if the option is picked up). MI is secure through 2025 (Hiura, Urias, Arcia?). C is secure at least through 2021 (Narvaez and Pina). That leaves a revolving door at 1B and 3B. There are typically enough useful players on the FA market each year on the corner IF to fill those roles.
It appears to me that the Brewers are using this market as an unofficial minor league team. They are developing a pipeline of controllable arms (Woody, Houser, Peralta, Burnes, Lauer, Small, Supak, Lazar, Kelly etc etc). They are just fine on the pitching front. What is there not to like about this strategy?
Cain will be 34 in April. Avisail Garcia is bad at baseball unless it became 2017 again or if he plans on beating his career BABIP by 60 points. Pina and Narvaez project for about 2.5 WAR between them. Pina is 32. Narvaez is only 28, but on his third team, and it’s not like the other two were good and he got squeezed out by all stars. Those 4 guys have seven 2 WAR seasons between them and Cain has 6 of them. Again, he’s going to be 34 in 5 weeks and is coming off a 1.5 WAR season.
The projections pages have them as the 10th best pitching staff and 17th best position players. This all screams middle of the pack.
I would not be so high on Narvaez/Pina or Arcia, Urias may take a little while to develop, Garcia is a wild-card at best, and the pitching is somewhere between average and mediocre. Very little help is coming from the farm. I think I would take the under on whatever you’re proposing, but at least as long as Yelich is healthy it’ll be fun.
I don’t see any real path for them forward with the current setup either unless a huge number of the guys currently in their system pan out or they have guys like Grandal inexplicably fall into their lap again. It’s hard because they only have four players who are very likely going to be good for the next 4-5 years: Yelich, Hader, Woodruff, and Hiura. Beyond that you’ve got Adrian Houser and Luis Urias as possibilities to join them…and…Freddy Peralta or Josh Lindblom or Corbin Burnes if you are feeling exceptionally generous. You can dream on Turang or Ashby or Small but there aren’t a lot of those guys so the only way to win in the next few years is going to be a huge proportion of their prospects working out, and that’s unlikely.
I think there’s a real problem is with the Brewers’ amateur scouting (or alternatively, their development program) that they need to fix. I’m actually hopeful that they’ve started, since virtually all of the prospects that look like they could be anything at all were signed in the last couple years (Turang, Ashby, Small, Garcia, and Rasmussen). Stearns didn’t even get prospects who panned out for the guys they traded away–their rebuild owes a tremendous amount to trading for Yelich for a package headlined by Brinson, and Hader and Houser came in before Stearns was hired. But even if they have or do fix that, that’s not going to pay dividends until Yelich is in decline.
They acquired Yelich by trading prospects, none of whom have panned out yet, though there is obviously plenty of time for all three.
Of all the prospects they’ve traded away, who has come back to bite them? Maybe Grisham will, but they’re kinda set in the OF & Urias is at worst comparable but at a position of greater need. Everyone worth keeping (Hader, Woodruff, Hiura, Burnes, Peralta, Houser, heck even Suter, though he was never really a “prospect” as it were) has been kept.
Try to money ball it with short term stop gaps? That’s how they spent this most recent offseason which they’ve been mostly panned for.
This is spot on. Outside of Grisham (who they traded for a prospect) and maybe Dubon the prospects they’ve traded away don’t look like they’d be contributors for the Brewers right now, let alone stars. Their farm unequivocally stinks right now, but the guys that are graduated and contributing will be around for a while, and they’ve gotten a lot of surplus through waiver wire work and free agent signings.
The Brewers are taking the A’s model — try to build a team that can be competitive year in and year out with as few glaring holes as possible, with a mix of in-game opportunity optimization, over-performance, and luck determining the year-to-year success of that strategy. It’s worked the last two years despite sub-par projections. Being able to anchor Yelich into that model at a below-market cost is a no-brainer, and the idea that the alternative of turning him into prospects would make them better off seems wrong to me.
Oh no, the trading away prospects was a great idea and has worked out beautifully for them (the trading Villar for Schoop thing was regrettable but that’s not really the same thing). The trading *for* prospects was a bust. Here’s the list, as far as I can remember:
-None of the three guys they got for Lucroy look like they’ll ever be a regular, and probably not even a part-timer.
-Neither of the guys they got for Khris Davis look like they’ll ever be a regular, and probably not even a part-timer.
-Neither of the guys they got for Will Smith look like they’ll be a regular, and probably not even a part-timer.
-Dubon probably won’t be anything, although he has a shot
-Jett Bandy left on a jett plane
-I’m not sold on Isan Diaz, but he’s probably the best of the crop.
-They did get Manny Pina and Freddy Peralta who have been (and probably will continue to be) useful part-time players.
-Maybe Supak will turn into something? And Keon Broxton had some fun moments.
Where the Brewers have won trades is where they’ve turned these guys, who by and large have been terrible, into major league players again (like in the Brinson trade).
It’s wild because the Brewers have, by all accounts, had a very successful rebuild, but they’ve done it largely through savvy free agent signings (like Grandal), guys who had worn out their welcome (Villar, Shaw–Shaw in particular was an outstanding get) and by trading their big prospect prize (Brinson) for a guy who turned into a Top-10 position player in MLB, and probably Top 5 (Yelich). It is impressive, but unless you can start actually developing some of your guys it’s a tough act to sustain.
Lucroy got them Brinson and Brinson got them Yelich…
Yasmani Grandal signed with the White Soxen
I really like the tone of this write-up, Jay, portraying this as a win/win for both the player and the team.
After spending almost all of baseball writing history viewing the winner/loser of huge deals through the prism of ‘value to the team’, I feel like the last few years we’ve been conditioned to only view things through the eyes of the player, and thus any deal that is not the best a player could have gotten is viewed as some sort of failure on the part of the player or their representation. Christian Yelich’s timing, as you point out, may simply have not allowed him to optimize his career earnings. That said, he’s going to make over $250 million when his career is finished, and seems to really enjoy playing in Milwaukee, which is certainly a generally undervalued aspect of these things when we talk about contracts (I feel).
It just strikes me that I don’t read enough write-ups like this in sports when a guy signs a huge deal. It’s always about the team screwing the player, or the player taking on a bloated contract that he didn’t deserve to get… There’s always a winner and a loser. Sometimes, and it seems in this case, the team and player are both ecstatic with the arrangement.
Jose Ramirez is an interesting case, as he also signed a very modest extension that pays him very little through 2021 and then 2 medium options ($11 and $13). He could become a free agent at 31 but is unlikely to get $200 million I think, unless he returns to 2017-18 form.
The best comparative case study is Andrew McCutchen. Entering their age-28 seasons, both he and Yelich had won an MVP two years prior and led the NL in OPS+ the season before. Both were also facing extended years of team control (Yelich 3/$41.5mn and McCutchen 4/$52mn). How did McCutchen play out? At age-28, in 2015, he had another excellent year, and before the 2016 season, there were talks about an extension. The two sides didn’t get close to an agreement, but one reported offer was 6/$120 million that would have begun at age-32. As we know, McCutchen didn’t sign the deal and never performed to prior levels again. In 2019, he ended up signing for 3/$50mn. Chances are McCutchen’s next contract won’t make up for the 3/$70mn he may have left on the table, and that’s the calculus facing Yelich today.
Incidentally, the trade off between risk and reward is something we need to keep in mind when looking at how salaries have trended of late. As the game has transitioned from players maxing their value on the open market to cashing in early with extensions, we should expect a period marked initially by better than normal growth and then followed by stagnation as the trend normalizes. It seems as if we may be toward the end of that latter stage.
Do we know if there’s a no-trade clause included? Attanasio claimed (without evidence, of course) that the Brewers operated at a loss last year, so it doesn’t seem likely he’s going to spend in the near future, they have the worst or one of the worst farm systems in baseball, and they’re projected to be about a .500 team this season.
Stearns is a Luhnow disciple. If the Brewers are an 81 win team this year, then I think there’s a pretty convincing case to be made that their best course forward would be to trade Yelich to a team in win now mode with a good farm system like the Dodgers. Betts is a free agent next offseason, and if he has another great season, he’ll (rightfully) demand $350+.
It’s a good deal for Yelich. No matter how great he played over the next 3 years, teams (correctly) aren’t giving out $200m+ deals to 31 year old position players in free agency
The asterisk is missing from the Altuve stat line.
Why does the ZiPS projection on Yelich’s player page show 5.3 WAR for 2020, and this table shows 6.1? Further, if you look at the 2021 and 2022 projections on the site, they show as 5.1 and 4.8, respectively. Yet here again, this table shows them as 5.7 and 5.4. What gives?
New money and new contract years only – the extension is $173.5mm for the ’23-’28 seasons. Zips projects 18.8 WAR. That’s $9.2mm/WAR.
Seems similar to Braun’s 2nd contract signed in 2011 for the 2016-2020 seasons and keeping the generational player. Hopefully Yelich better avoids the injury issues that plagued Braun.
I suspect that the Brewers will be regretting this extension in about 4 years. They basically just spent a lot of money to lock in Yellich’s declining years (age 30 to 37 I think?). And they signed him at his absolute peak in value. I have not seen too many of these sorts of extensions work out (although I have not gone through and found a data set to compare it with).
I’m not sure I agree with the methodology of evaluating the contract used here.
Firstly, the $15 million option for 2022 should be regarded as money that otherwise wouldn’t have to be spent, which means that the additional money is $173.5 million for six years, not $188.5 for seven years. That also means that the projected WAR in the additional contract years doesn’t include 2022. That makes a pretty substantial difference.
Secondly, the article doesn’t really consider the timing of the deal being three years before the Brewers lose control of Yelich. While this kind of deal limits risk for both sides, the downside risk still has to be regarded as somewhat greater for the individual player. There ought to be a discount of some kind when a player agrees to a contract well before free agency, since the relative risks aren’t equal.
I’ve never heard the Cream City nickname for Milwaukee. Anybody care to give me some background? I… I don’t want to Google that phrase.
It’s named for the distinctive cream colored brick that much of the city was built with in the 19th century up until the 20s. The color comes from the chemical makeup of the Menominee valley clay.
https://www.wuwm.com/post/how-milwaukee-got-nickname-cream-city
Wiki says the clay around Milwaukee turns into cream-colored brick.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cream_City_brick
While signing that first contract in 2015 that bought out his first 2 contract years may have cost him a significant amount of money on paper, it’s hard to know just how much pressure that 7yr 49 million took off Yelich’ shoulders so he could play financially stress free and help allow him to become the superstar he now is.
If I’m understanding correctly, you could say he got himself 50m guaranteed years ago in exchange for giving up potentially 100m or so on this current deal. I’d say that’s probably worth it for peace of mind