Clarke Schmidt’s Injury Adds to the Yankees’ Problems

There’s never a good time to lose a starting pitcher, but doing so when you’ve lost six of your last seven games and have relinquished first place in your division is an especially unwelcome happenstance. This is what the New York Yankees are currently experiencing, as Clarke Schmidt, who was placed on the injured list due to forearm tightness after an early exit from his Thursday start, will likely undergo Tommy John surgery. With a 3.32 ERA, 3.90 FIP, and 1.2 WAR in 14 starts, Schmidt appeared to be headed towards his best season in the majors, but short of a miracle, he’ll now be out until well into the 2026 season at least. Coming just as the offense appeared to be recovering from its June swoon, the Yankees’ trade deadline to-do list may have just gotten a bit longer.
Six weeks ago, the Yankees were in a strong, though not insurmountable, position at the top of the AL East. No fan should start making travel plans based on a seven-game divisional lead in late May, but it’s about as strong a position as a team can hope to have in a good division. In his May 28 start, Schmidt threw six shutout innings en route to a 1-0 victory over the Angels, giving the Yankees that a seven-game lead (their seasonal high-water mark) and a 35-20 overall record. Since then, the Yankees have gone 14-21, losing 11 games in the standings relative to the current first-place team, the Blue Jays.
The disappearance of the offense was a big part of the Yankees’ slump, at least until the last week or so. On the whole, the offense dropped to a .718 OPS in June after posting an .812 OPS through the end of May, a mark that was second only to the Dodgers. Half of the team’s plate appearances in June were made by players with a wRC+ under 90 for the month, including key early-season performers Paul Goldschmidt and Ben Rice, as well as a returning Giancarlo Stanton. The pitching remained solid despite the team’s 13-14 month, with the rotation combining for a 3.19 ERA and a slightly less exciting 3.79 FIP.
During New York’s most recent slide, these roles have reversed. The offense scored at least five runs in all but one of the team’s losses over the last week, a level of run support that even the Rockies or White Sox ought to find sufficient. But Carlos Rodón, Max Fried, and Will Warren all had atrocious outings during the losing streak, while for its part, the bullpen allowed 13 walks and 24 earned runs over 21 innings.
On the morning of May 29, our Depth Chart projections pegged the Yankees with a 92% chance of winning the division and a 98% shot of making the playoffs. Their overall playoff percentage has only dropped to 85%, but their division chances have gotten slashed by more than half, to 37%, with the Blue Jays now being the plurality favorite. ZiPS still has the Yankees as the favorite, but just by a hair, or perhaps a half-skosh:
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 88 | 74 | — | .543 | 38.4% | 42.1% | 80.5% | 6.9% |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 88 | 74 | — | .543 | 35.7% | 42.7% | 78.4% | 3.5% |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 86 | 76 | 2 | .531 | 19.6% | 44.5% | 64.1% | 3.0% |
| Boston Red Sox | 83 | 79 | 5 | .512 | 4.9% | 26.0% | 30.9% | 1.2% |
| Baltimore Orioles | 79 | 83 | 9 | .488 | 1.4% | 11.9% | 13.3% | 0.7% |
What’s alarming is just how quickly these probabilities have dropped. It was just last week that I posted the ZiPS midseason standings, and my mean ol’ computer had the Yankees at a comparatively robust 61% chance of winning the division. A drop-off to 38% represents nearly one quarter of a playoff appearance, a shocking shift in less than a week’s worth of games, even with the loss of their no. 3 starter.
A small shopping list for July naturally ought to be a good bit longer now. Losing Gerrit Cole a few weeks before the start of the season was a blow, but the front four of Fried, Rodón, Schmidt, and Warren have made that loss seem, if not consequential, at least survivable. With the loss of Schmidt, we have the Yankees with the 13th-ranked rotation over the rest of the season. Remember, however, that there are certain assumptions baked in, including Luis Gil returning from injury in late July without missing a beat, and basically perfect health from Rodón and Fried. As the Dodgers can attest, we can never be certain a pitcher will remain healthy, and Rodón especially has a difficult injury history. The ZiPS in-season standings model does assume that every pitcher has at least some chance of suffering a serious injury, and with the chance of losing a Fried or Rodón due to injury factored in, the Yankees rotation drops to 18th in the majors.
To illustrate this, I asked ZiPS to give me the rotation projections if every team in baseball went through the rest of the season with the pitchers who we have sixth through 10th on our current depth charts. New York’s Plan B rotation of Cam Schlittler, Ryan Yarbrough, Allan Winans, JT Brubaker, and Brendan Beck would project to rank just 26th when matched up against the other rotations using the same methodology. Naturally, that’s an extreme scenario, and it would require monumentally bad fortune for anything like it to transpire, but it’s a demonstration of the rotation’s depth issues just weeks before the trade deadline.
Speaking of, there don’t appear to be a lot of pitchers available, but the Yankees would be wise to make serious inquiries about the cost of bringing Sandy Alcantara or Zach Eflin to town. They should even be looking at pitchers who are struggling but have decent upside. For example, Zac Gallen has had a lousy season, but he has a strong history, and he looked better against the Giants in his last start than he had since his 13-strikeout outing against the Yankees in April.
The Yankees are usually quite active at addressing the team’s needs when they’re in the playoff hunt. July acquisitions in recent years include Jazz Chisholm Jr., Frankie Montas, Harrison Bader, Andrew Benintendi, Andrew Heaney, Joey Gallo, and Clay Holmes. At the time of those trades, every single one of those players at least partially filled a team concern.
The AL East divisional race looks more like a battle than the parade it appeared to be six weeks ago. The Yankees need some reinforcements, and they need them soon.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Nitpicking but should this be 80.5 and 38.4 or 81 and 38 if we’re rounding? The chart the paragraph seems to be talking about has different data
The thing is…I don’t know what exactly the Yankees have that other teams will be interested in. Possibly S. Jones and some low-to-mid-level interesting arms. But that doesn’t buy you much.
Also, utterly unrelated, but man is the Yankees’ AAA roster just the Land of Misfit Toys right now.
There are a lot of legitimately good arms in the system even if they don’t move Schlittler (who’ll probably make a few turns in the rotation until Yarbrough returns) and Lagrange. Hess, Cunningham, and especially Rodriguez-Cruz could each be very enticing.
Position players are very thin especially since Lombard is almost certainly untouchable and Jones likely is too with Grisham and Bellinger likely FAs after the season. Rafael Flores and Roc Riggio are okay, but nothing to jump about.
Catchers and pitchers are what the Yankees have a steady flow of, which is what other orgs always want. I’m sure they’re hoping the Yankees have a few more Narvaezes, Ramirezes, and such lying around.
Lombard and Schlittler are the two guys I would be most interested in, followed by Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz, Carlos Lagrange, and Bryce Cunningham.
Ben Hess is probably after them, and I don’t think NYY and teams they are trading with are going to see eye-to-eye on Spencer Jones’s value.
It seems like it would be impossible to get a playoff-worthy starter without Lombard in the mix, and if Schlittler can pitch the Yankees need him. But if they just need an arm, they probably wouldn’t have to give up anyone of an FV40+ or higher for Aaron Civale, maybe not Andrew Heaney either.
What pitchers were going for 55 FV prospects last deadline? Or the deadline before that? Certainly not Flaherty, Eflin, etc.
I still don’t entirely get the Eflin deal, it must have been due to his injury history (this year is probably a good indication of what teams feared).
Flaherty got a 50 in 2024. Verlander got a FV50 prospect the year before, as did Jordan Montgomery. Maybe Scherzer too…I don’t think Acuna was considered an FV50 at the time, but maybe I am misremembering.
Lombard’s the only FV50 or higher guy with prospect eligibility, and since there are basically no playoff-caliber starters who are available and free agents this offseason, they would be bidding on guys with 2 (or more) years of team control. Those guys were all rentals.
But that’s only if they wanted a guy who could pitch in a playoff rotation. If they want Aaron Civale, that’s a different story.
I suspect it’s a Agustin Ramirez situation where teams valued him higher than prospect rankings with Schlittler and Lagrange. Fangraphs gave Ramirez a 50 after the trade, and ESPN, MLB, and BA ranked him top 100 preseason. Lagrange sits upper 90s and has gotten his control into a manageable range. Schlittler sits 97, T99, with really nice secondary offerings. TJStats on twitter gave Schlittler 4 plus pitches in his model. I think they’re both firm 50s. Probably in the 50-100 range.
I don’t follow this construction: “if not consequential, at least survivable”. In the “if not X, at least Y” shouldnt the relationship between X and Y track differently? Like, “the hotel room, if not luxurious, is at least tidy” or “the interface, if not first rate, is at least serviceable”…. Am I missing something ? The idea being communicated is supposed to be: The loss of Cole was a consequential one but the quality of the four front line starters behind him have at least made that loss survivable? I guess “if not INconsequential” would track – but that feels like an avoidable double negative even if it might not be strictly… anyway…
If they’re going up Schmidt’s creek, at least there will be a Schlitter there
A smart GM would recognize that this isn’t the Yankees’ year and sell off as much as possible at the deadline. Need to find big upgrades over Volpe, Goldschmidt/Rice, the 2B/3B crew minus Chisholm, 4/5 of the rotation, and almost all of the bullpen. The roster is embarrassingly bad for a $300M budget
A smart GM isn’t going to tank and rebuild with Aaron Judge on the roster.
Your takes aren’t any better when we’re not on Twitter.
If it were as simple as “this isn’t the Yankees’ year” then they wouldn’t have gotten off to the start they did.
They have a long slump every year somewhere around the All Star Break. That is clearly the sign of something wrong that they need to fix, but they always come out of it. They’ll be fine.
It’s wild to me that you think one of Fried or Rodon is so bad that he needs to be replaced.
Max Fried went 6IP 4ER in Toronto during the losing streak, and I think some of those runs were allowed to score by the bullpen.
Hardly “atrocious”. He’s not the issue.
Thanks to the new playoff format, the Yankees still have an 85% chance to make the playoffs. They’re in a fine spot. Obviously not ideal, but they’ve got to have some positive regression at some point. They’ve just been so unlucky. But they need to optimize better now that they don’t have a comfy playoff spot. They need to play Rice/Dominguez every day against righties. And Goldschmidt needs to be a part time player. He can’t hit righties. And bench Giancarlo against righties until he starts hitting a bit. The Yankees need Boone to elevate them for once in his career (don’t hold your breath).
Can’t say Dan (and others) didn’t warn us. After Cole went down there were lots and lots of injury question marks in the rotation and it seemed like they were on a knife’s edge. They survived losing Cole and Gil and Stroman being bad, but Schlittler seems like the last guy they have on hand who could be a competent starting pitcher to fill in. One more goes down and they’re going to be going to Brendan Beck, Carlos Carrasco, or Allan Winans.
Really the only reason they survived Stroman being bad is because he’s missed most of the year. Yarbrough should at least be back soon-ish and Gil at the end of the month but now they’re in a situation where they absolutely have to acquire a #3 starting pitcher if they want a legit chance at the WS this year.
It is amazing how far Stroman has fallen that Yarborough is a big upgrade. This isn’t a big dig at Yarborough tbf just how bad Stroman is. I agree they need at least a mid rotation starter I can see them being among the teams making a big run at trading for Keller.
They don’t have any pieces I really think Pittsburgh would be interested in since both systems’ strengths are pitching. I’d go after guys like Merrill Kelly or Michael Soroka.
True the farm isn’t in great shape I was thinking maybe Cabrera but Kelly makes the most sense.
I think it’s an averageish farm at this point. Lombard, Schlittler, and Lagrange are obvious top 100 prospects. Even if this site doesn’t rank them as such. While Rodriguez-Cruz and Cunningham are closeish. I’d 45+ both of them at this point. Everyone says the Yankees farm is bad, and every year they make impact trades.
I think you’re a bit too high on Schlittler and Lagrange. Obviously, we don’t know what Eric thinks. But mlb.com and Baseball America released updated top 100 lists in the past week. MLB didn’t have either one listed. BA did have Schlittler at 89 but no mention of Lagrange.
I don’t think the Pirates would even bother responding unless Lombard is in the offer. I think the same is probably true of the D-Backs and Merrill Kelly. In both cases the Cubs and Red Sox would easily outbid them without Lombard in the deal. Maybe the Dodgers and Mets too, but I am not as sure about that.
Soroka you could get with Rodriguez-Cruz and some other vaguely interesting prospects, though. Maybe I’m wrong but I don’t think he’s in the same class as the other two.
The compounding issue is that Fried, Rodon, and Warren are all on pace for a career high in innings pitched. They really don’t have any choice other than to keep riding those three. But how much are they willing to push them and at what cost?
I can see them cheaping out for a Houser or Civale to get them through the back half and spend most of the rest of their resources covering other needs.