Cubs’ Need for Quality Pitching Leads to Cole Hamels

In late July, basically every contender is in pursuit of starting pitching in some form or another, whether it’s an ace who can make an impact in the playoffs or a rotation piece who can help the club survive the duration of the season.

That’s certainly the case for the Chicago Cubs. While the club actually does currently have five experienced and healthy starters — plus Yu Darvish — what they need most is quality starting pitching. The team’s starters have put up a 4.76 FIP and accumulated just 3.0 WAR, ranking 25th in baseball and outpacing only the Reds by that measure in the National League. It has quite possibly been one of the franchise’s worst rotations ever so far. And even after accounting for Cubs’ above-average defense, the team still only places in the middle of the pack in terms of run-prevention. In order to give themselves the best possible chance of qualifying for the postseason, Chicago needed better starting pitching.

Last night, they attempted to meet that need, reaching an agreement with the Texas Rangers to acquire left-hander Cole Hamels.

In Hamels, the Cubs receive a pitcher who’s recorded a good road ERA while having performed less well in a very tough pitcher’s park. It stands to reason, as Buster Olney himself reasoned yesterday afternoon, that a change in scenery alone — to a better park, to a league without the designated hitter — might lead to much better performances for Hamels. While there might be something to that, it’s important to remember that similar sentiments accompanied Tyler Chatwood’s arrival in Chicago. Now Hamels is probably taking Chatwood’s job.

After the Cubs signed Chatwood to a three-year, $39 million deal over the winter, he drew comparisons to Charlie Morton. Whatever fixes the Cubs might have tried this season, they haven’t worked . After 19 starts, Chatwood’s FIP is 5.57, 35% worse than league average and 98th out of the 99 pitchers who’ve recorded at least 90 innings. His 4.98 ERA isn’t much better, about 20% worse than league average and 89th out of 99 pitchers. Chatwood has 85 walks and just 82 strikeouts on the season. It will take weeks and probably into September before another pitcher beats his walk total. Only Wade Miley had more walks all of last season. He’s also averaging under five innings per start and completed six innings in just three of 19 outings.

Given Chatwood’s struggles, the bar for Hamels to clear is fairly low in terms of representing an improvement. That said, this season has not been a good one for the former ace. In 20 starts, Hamels has pitched 114.1 innings with a 4.72 ERA and 5.20 FIP, barely above replacement level. Despite the disappointing season, he’s still been about half a win better than Chatwood. The Cubs would not have made this trade if that was the totality of the upgrade they expected to receive. Vintage Hamels is expecting too much, but it is possible he was being unduly hurt by homers in his home park.

Hamels has given up 1.8 homer per nine innings this season, a figure that ranks 78th out of 80 qualified pitchers. At home, that number is an even more enormous (2.4), while on the road, it is a reasonable 1.1 per nine innings. Using Statcast, we can get a rough estimate about how many home runs Hamels has given up at home that might be considered unlucky. The home runs with less than a 50% chance of going out in a neutral park by launch angle and exit velocity are highlighted below.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
Cole Hamels Home Runs at Home
Game Date Batter Pitch Dist Launch Angle EV MPH HR%
2018-07-23 Stephen Piscotty CH 375 38.7 100.6 26%
2018-07-23 Jonathan Lucroy FC 408 23.6 99.4 22%
2018-06-25 Jose Pirela CH 384 23.2 108.6 93%
2018-06-25 Manuel Margot FC 424 26.4 106.2 92%
2018-06-07 Alex Bregman SI 397 26.9 100.7 58%
2018-06-07 Evan Gattis CH 415 27.6 104.9 89%
2018-05-27 Salvador Perez CH 394 36.9 102.7 51%
2018-05-27 Drew Butera FA 353 24.2 95.3 2%
2018-05-22 Miguel Andujar FC 402 23.9 103.6 88%
2018-05-22 Gleyber Torres FA 399 37.4 104.9 69%
2018-05-05 Mitch Moreland SI 35.5 100.4 35%
2018-04-24 Mark Canha SI 376 27.0 99 43%
2018-04-08 Kendrys Morales FA 404 19.6 106.2 34%
2018-04-08 Steve Pearce FA 393 32.6 108.5 92%
2018-03-29 Jake Marisnick FA 397 31.2 105.8 87%
2018-03-29 George Springer FA 364 25.4 104.6 85%
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

A few homers of the homers here are probably of the cheaper variety. Even if we were to eliminate every homer below 50%, though, Hamels would still have a 1.5 HR/9 at home. We can’t simply eliminate Hamels’ home numbers when evaluating him as a pitcher. It’s not that easy. Looking at the quality of the contact Hamels has given up, we see that his xwOBA at home is .365 while his xwOBA on the road is .347. That’s a smaller gap than his home and road ERAs would suggest and seems to indicate that Hamels isn’t pitching significantly better on the road compared to home. He’s just been a bit unlucky at home, allowing a .312 BABIP while recording a 68% left-on-base rate. On the road, those figures are .277 and 77%, respectively.

With the Cubs, Hamels won’t be just the pitcher we’ve seen on the road, and he won’t be the massively homer-prone pitcher we’ve seen at home. He will be both. Hamels’ strikeout and walk numbers have been solid this season. It’s also reasonable to expect the elevated home-run totals, which are the main cause for his poor overall numbers, to come down — just not all the way down to the 1.1 HR/9 he’s allowed on the road.

Hamels’ fastballs have been hit pretty hard this year, but that has always been true. Against his four-seamer, hitters have a 125 wRC+ for Hamels’ career and a 119 wRC+ against his sinker. Hamels has always been able to use his great offspeed offerings to balance out the fastballs. That has still been true this season, but there’s some reason to believe that his fastballs are eroding a bit with age, even if the velocity is decent. Here’s Hamels’ swinging-strike rates from our pitch splits page on his fastballs over the course of his career.

On plate appearances that have ended with the four-seam fastball, Hamels has given up twice as many walks (16%) as strikeouts (7%). The fastball isn’t an effective pitch for Hamels right now. It’s possible the Cubs can help improve it by further emphasizing the offspeed stuff and using the fastball more up in the zone as a change of pace. All of his offspeed offerings, including his cutter and a new slider, have been effective pitches, but Hamels has had a difficult time establishing the fastball. That’s still going to create problems for him and will probably make him a bit homer-prone. If the Cubs are expecting the magic Hamels has shown on the road or an encore performance of his start at Wrigley back in 2015, there is likely to be disappointment. As far as an upgrade over Tyler Chatwood and the potential for a league-average starter, the division-leading Cubs just made their team a good bit better the rest of the way.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

“Quality pitching” and “Cole Hamels” in the same sentence…

sourbobMember since 2026
8 years ago

This is well-framed. The Cubs didn’t pay for an ace when they bought Hamels, so it’s immaterial whether he is still an ace. They paid a minimal price for a #4/#5 starter upgrade and are likely to get that.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  sourbob

The fact that Hamels is an upgrade is mostly because Tyler Chatwood is literally walking more batters than he is striking out.

If Cole Hamels was a prompt on jeopardy, the answer would be: “Who do you trade for when Lance Lynn costs too much in prospects?”

(I don’t know if I would have said this if the Yankees had got him, since the Yankees are getting their pitchers to abandon the fastball…but that’s not the Cubs at all)

TheomyheroMember since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  sourbob

This is exactly what I was thinking. The Cubs are relying on Lester, Darvish, Hendricks, and Quintana for the playoffs. They got Hammels to eat innings and save the bullpen.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Theomyhero

I think he also gives them insurance if Darvish isn’t back. Montgomery wouldn’t be forced to be in the rotation, and can go help fortify the bullpen.

Plus the regular season does matter to try to get the #1 seed and get wild card team in rd 1 rather than a division champion.

signedepsteinsmother
8 years ago
Reply to  sourbob

What’s disturbing is Hamels is 2cnd Among Cub starters in xFIP. In fact, one could make a good argument, as of now, that he is their best starter.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=4972,12049,4930,11423,4869

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago

I think one thing with Hamels is now he won’t be going up against the DH.

He’s had 10 starts this year vs top 5 AL offenses- 4 Hou, 3 Oak, 1 ea vs Bos, Cle, and NYY.. 6 of those 10 were at home. Looking at his projected schedule, he won’t face anyone as good as those 10 the rest of the season.

Art Fay
8 years ago
Reply to  stever20

His stats have to improve. While the NL has more parity, it’s bad parity. The AL is way too tough now for an old warship like Hamels. I’m happy for him he gets to play in the easier league now and hopefully pitch a few more seasons. He probably doesn’t belong in the AL moving forward.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Art Fay

well he had 4 road games at Oakland, Houston, Cleveland, and Houston again earlier in the season. In those 4 games- he had 22 innings with only 15 hits allowed, and 4 er. 11/31 bb/k ratio- walks a bit high- but great k hunbers.

Really think most of it is the home park. Right now, it’s on pace to be one of the 10 most extreme hitters park seasons by runs since 2001.

J2butter
8 years ago
Reply to  stever20

that’s probably because the Rangers’ pitching staff is one of the 10 worst since 2001

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  J2butter

Your park factor is comparing how both teams do at home vs both teams away….
For Texas this year- it’s mind boggling.
home scored 274 allowed 335 in 54 games (609 runs in 54 games- 11.28 per game
Away scored 190 allowed 218 in 50 games (408 in 54- 7.56 per game)

bootsy
8 years ago
Reply to  Art Fay

Don’t agree with this. Bad parity? Every team is at .500 or better except 4teams in the NL. That’s not bad parity. It’s not every team is hovering around .500. There are no easy series in the NL outside of the Mets, Marlins, and Padres. And I can’t go with the ‘AL is way too tough’ when you have the entire AL Central outside of Cleveland, Baltimore, Toronto. There is a lot more mediocrity in the AL than the NL. 3 teams have a sub .400 winning % with the Rangers barely hanging on.

E L
8 years ago
Reply to  Art Fay

NL has been the better league in interleague play. It has four below .500 teams and those teams are leagues ahead of the AL’s bottom four.

southie
8 years ago

I suddenly have Lookin’ for Love by Johnny Lee in my head.

shortstop
8 years ago

Any chance Chatwood is dealing with the yips? He already has a career high in walks and isn’t even close to matching his previous innings pitched totals. I think he needs a mental break.

swingofthings
8 years ago

Hamels’ fastball has lost 3.5 inches of rise compared to his career average (8 zmov, down from 11.5). It’s no wonder that a pitch which was mediocre (125 wRC+, 6.6 SwStr%) over the course of his career has become atrocious (254 wRC+, 3.4 SwStr%) with such a decline.

At this point, maybe he should just abandon it entirely and use a cutter as his primary pitch. It’s been great, with a 14 SwStr% this season. Only risk is that his dominant changeup might not work as well without so many fastballs, but that’s a risk I’d take if I were the Cubs.

tb.25
8 years ago
Reply to  swingofthings

Cubs lead MLB in fastball percentage, so I don’t think he’ll ditch it just yet (even if moving to cutter/sinker is better).

SteveMcAnderson
8 years ago

Why anyone expects Cole Hamels to be a “league-average starter” is beyond me. He had a 4.19 DRA in 2016, 5.47 DRA last year, and a 6.26 DRA this year. He is a bad pitcher.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago

1- he doesn’t have to face dh any more.
2- he isn’t pitching in Texas any longer. That park is the #1 batters park by a good margin this year. His away numbers are much better than his home numbers- and his away numbers were punctured by 1 real bad start at Detroit.
3- he will be facing a lot easier lineups in the NL than he has been facing. He has had 10 games vs top 5 AL offenses, better than anything he’s projected to see in the NL rest of the season. Even with that- on the road in those top 5 teams- he’s done very well.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  stever20

In theory, DRA adjusts for park, opponent, and temperature.

It’s possible that DRA doesn’t effectively tease out all these things, and also possible that Cole Hamels was hurt more than other Texas pitchers by these factors because of his specific pitching style (no, I don’t know why that would be either).

But there’s a strong possibility (and the one that I would consider most likely) that Hamels is going to be just as bad in Chicago as he was in Texas.

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I would be really curious to see what his home DRA was compared to his road DRA. I get that it accounts for that- but if the home DRA was much higher than the road DRA(which is very possible)- I think you have to think that he could be much better in Chicago. Just not having to face the DH also is a big factor.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  stever20

I have often wondered about how adjusting for park factors is even possible in really extreme parks. A lot of the methods we use to judge value are weird in both Fenway and in Colorado, and if Texas is really that extreme then DRA should have some difficulty adjusting for that (although, as a mixed model, it may be better at that than using static park factors).

What you’re suggesting, though, is that DRA might be interacting with Hamels’ repertoire in a weird way. It’s possible, and worthy of further study. I’m pretty sure that Epstein and Co. are convinced of that, or else they would have traded for Lance Lynn. I…am not convinced. Very much not.

On the other hand, I’m pretty sure the DH would be accounted for in quality of opposition.

WebsMember since 2020
8 years ago

Should we look at struck balls with a HR% <50% of balls that became outs as well as home runs? If the percentage of those balls that did become home runs is considerably higher than expected, then we can say he's been unlucky.

snood
8 years ago

“On plate appearances that have ended with the four-seam fastball, Hamels has given up twice as many walks (16%) as strikeouts (7%).”
I would LOVE to see the league stats for this. Seems ripe for selection bias, given how often pitchers throw fastballs in 3-0 and 3-1 counts.

E L
8 years ago

They’re not looking for 2017 Verlander, they’re looking for 2015 Dan Haren: a guy who takes the ball when needed and eats some innings while keeping the team in the game.

It’s not like Chatwood was slated to be in the October rotation or was costing the Cubs every chance of winning every time out (the team went 11-8 in the games he started). This is a small rotation upgrade that will keep the bullpen fresher down the stretch.

Nathan Lazarus
8 years ago

Hole Camels.