Do Not Sleep on Ronald Acuña Jr.
Between the fireworks shows put on by 21-year-olds Juan Soto and Fernando Tatis Jr., and the big numbers put up by teammates Freddie Freeman and Marcell Ozuna, Ronald Acuña Jr. didn’t command as much attention as his talents merited last year. A two-week stay on the injured list didn’t help, particularly when it came to posting eye-opening counting stats. Even so, and even in abbreviated form, Acuña turned in his third straight stellar campaign. As he heads into his age-23 season, his place among the game’s elite shouldn’t be ignored.
Acuña entered the 2020 season on a high note, following up his 2018 NL Rookie of the Year campaign with his first as an All-Star. Playing in 156 games in 2019, he hit .280/.365/.518 (126 wRC+), bashed 41 homers and stole a league-high 37 bases in 46 attempts; three more steals, and he would have joined Barry Bonds, Jose Canseco, Alex Rodriguez, and Alfonso Soriano as the only members of the 40–40 club. Back in the Baseball Abstract days, Bill James introduced a simple stat called Power-Speed number, which takes the harmonic mean of a player’s home run and stolen base totals. Acuña’s 2019 season is tied for 16th overall, and sixth among players 25 or under:
| Player | Tm | Year | Age | HR | SB | PSN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Rodriguez | SEA | 1998 | 22 | 42 | 46 | 43.91 |
| Eric Davis | CIN | 1987 | 25 | 37 | 50 | 42.53 |
| Jose Canseco | OAK | 1988 | 23 | 42 | 40 | 40.98 |
| Barry Bonds | PIT | 1990 | 25 | 33 | 52 | 40.38 |
| Eric Davis | CIN | 1986 | 24 | 27 | 80 | 40.37 |
| Ronald Acuña Jr. | ATL | 2019 | 21 | 41 | 37 | 38.90 |
| Willie Mays | NYG | 1956 | 25 | 36 | 40 | 37.89 |
| Darryl Strawberry | NYM | 1987 | 25 | 39 | 36 | 37.44 |
| Bobby Bonds | SFG | 1969 | 23 | 32 | 45 | 37.40 |
| Mike Trout | LAA | 2012 | 20 | 30 | 49 | 37.22 |
| Hanley Ramirez | FLA | 2007 | 23 | 29 | 51 | 36.98 |
| José Ramírez | CLE | 2018 | 25 | 39 | 34 | 36.33 |
| Cesar Cedeno | HOU | 1974 | 23 | 26 | 57 | 35.71 |
| Grady Sizemore | CLE | 2008 | 25 | 33 | 38 | 35.32 |
| Ryne Sandberg | CHC | 1985 | 25 | 26 | 54 | 35.10 |
| Shawn Green | TOR | 1998 | 25 | 35 | 35 | 35.00 |
| Cesar Cedeno | HOU | 1973 | 22 | 25 | 56 | 34.57 |
| Sammy Sosa | CHC | 1993 | 24 | 33 | 36 | 34.43 |
| Hanley Ramirez | FLA | 2008 | 24 | 33 | 35 | 33.97 |
| Bobby Bonds | SFG | 1970 | 24 | 26 | 48 | 33.73 |
| Preston Wilson | FLA | 2000 | 25 | 31 | 36 | 33.31 |
| Mike Schmidt | PHI | 1975 | 25 | 38 | 29 | 32.90 |
| Ron Gant | ATL | 1990 | 25 | 32 | 33 | 32.49 |
| David Wright | NYM | 2007 | 24 | 30 | 34 | 31.88 |
| Carlos Beltran | KCR | 2002 | 25 | 29 | 35 | 31.72 |
| Trevor Story | COL | 2018 | 25 | 37 | 27 | 31.22 |
| Mookie Betts | BOS | 2018 | 25 | 32 | 30 | 30.97 |
| Francisco Lindor | CLE | 2018 | 24 | 38 | 25 | 30.16 |
Those are some of the most electrifying seasons ever put together by young players. Landing between the more extreme of Davis’ two amazing seasons and a Mays one — well, that is some damn company. It’s also quite frankly far more interesting than Acuña’s 5.6 WAR ranking eighth in the NL that season and ninth among all seasons by position players 21 and under in the post-1960 expansion era.
Acuña’s 2020 season wasn’t quite as electrifying. In fact, he started quite slowly, going just 5-for-33 with 17 strikeouts and no homers through his first eight games before heating up over his next 11 games with four homers. Alas, he was scratched from the Braves’ lineup on August 11 due to soreness in his left wrist and wound up missing 10 games for what was diagnosed merely as inflammation, a problem he believed stemmed from an awkward dive into a base. He homered in his first game back on August 26, off the Yankees’ Gerrit Cole, but after five games was sidelined again for a few days due to right hamstring tightness. Upon returning to the lineup, he homered three times in a doubleheader and once the next day, and he didn’t miss another game.
Acuña finished the season with a .250/.406/.582 line. His batting average was atypically low, 35 points worse than what he’d done in 2018–19, but he hit the ball harder than ever. His 92.4 mph average exit velocity, 16% barrel rate, .425 xwOBA, and 57% hard-hit rate all placed in the 91st percentile to the 98th percentile.
Acuña did that while swinging at a career-low 40.7% of pitches (down from the 45–46% range in his first two seasons), with his swing rate in the strike zone dropping about seven points to 60.3% and his swing rate out of the zone falling about two points to 21.1%. Protecting his wrist may have been a factor, given that Braves general manager Alex Anthopoulos told the media it was still sore throughout the postseason (recall him aggravating the wrist after taking a tumble while legging out an infield hit in NLCS Game 4, after which he went 1-for-12 with two walks). Acuña’s rolling swing rate doesn’t line up perfectly with the reported injury, but he definitely swung less later in the season:

I included 2019 for comparison; Acuña’s only time in 2020 above his two-year average (the dotted line) was the period between his two absences. Anyway, via his more disciplined approach, his walk rate spiked to 18.8%, which ranked third in the NL and was about eight points higher than 2019. His .406 on-base percentage and .581 slugging percentage both represented career bests and ranked seventh and eighth in the league, respectively. His 2.4 WAR was tied for eighth and his 14 homers was tied for 12th — that despite missing just under a quarter of the season.
With Freeman hitting .341/.462/.640 with a league-high 3.3 WAR en route to the NL MVP award and a second-place finish behind Soto in all three slash stats, and Ozuna leading the league in homers (18), RBI (56), and total bases (145), Acuña was merely the third-most productive Braves hitter. It felt as though he didn’t capture the public imagination as a prodigy the way that the 21-year-old Soto and Tatis did. A 22-year-old veteran doing those things? Old news.
Given the eight-year, $100 million extension that he signed in April 2019, Acuña certainly isn’t lined up to be paid like Tatis, who signed a 14-year, $340 million extension last month, or Soto, whom the Nationals reportedly plan to offer a long-term extension, if they haven’t already. The latter, who has 25 days less service time than Acuña (two years and 134 days to two and 159), is making $8.5 million going year-to-year. Acuña, meanwhile, will be paid a fraction of what he’s projected to be worth during his mid- and late 20s thanks to a deal that former colleague Craig Edwards called “hard to fully comprehend,” as he signed away two to four seasons of free agency (the last two are club options) for which he’ll earn just $17 million per year.
That said, I’m not here to rehash that contract, as exasperating as it is. I’m here because I’ve been dreaming on Acuña since drawing the right field assignment in our annual Positional Power Rankings and trying to place him in the context of the aforementioned whippersnappers, whose long-term projections I’ve examined at length. Before getting to the whole thing, I’ll note that ZiPS projects him to be worth 5.9 WAR in 2021, the fourth-highest total in the majors behind Trout (6.7), Alex Bregman (6.0), and Betts (6.0), with Soto just below him at 5.7. Steamer doesn’t hold him in quite as high regard, with his 5.3 WAR there ranking ninth, but in our Depth Charts projections, which averages the two systems with manual adjustments for playing time, he’s in a virtual tie for fifth with José Ramírez at 5.7 WAR.
Dan Szymborski recently published ZiPS projections for 2022 and ’23 to go with this year’s, and that’s where the fun really starts:
| Player | 2021 Age | 2021 WAR | 2022 WAR | 2023 WAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Soto | 22 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 7.0 | 19.3 |
| Mike Trout | 29 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 19.1 |
| Ronald Acuña Jr. | 23 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 18.6 |
| Alex Bregman | 27 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 17.2 |
| Mookie Betts | 28 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 17.2 |
| Cody Bellinger | 25 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 16.0 |
| José Ramírez | 28 | 5.7 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 15.9 |
| Francisco Lindor | 27 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 14.6 |
| Matt Chapman | 28 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 14.5 |
| Fernando Tatis Jr. | 22 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 14.0 |
| Trea Turner | 28 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 13.4 |
| Ozzie Albies | 24 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 13.3 |
| Corey Seager | 27 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 13.3 |
| Gleyber Torres | 24 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 13.3 |
| Bo Bichette | 23 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 13.2 |
Oh hello, guy who’s within a win of Soto and Trout over a three-year period.
This actually shouldn’t be too big of a surprise if you’ve been following Dan’s work, because ZiPS loves Acuña. A year ago this month, just before the world fell apart, Dan examined the likely candidates to overtake Trout as the game’s best player as measured by projected WAR. He found Lindor to have the best chance of passing Trout in his projections in both 2021 and ’22, albeit with just a 9.7% chance in the former year and 11.7% chance in the latter. That didn’t come to pass, as Lindor failed to light the world on fire in the pandemic-shortened season. Come 2024, however, the projections showed Acuña with an 18.8% chance of having the game’s highest projected WAR, ahead of Trout’s 16.1%, with Soto third at 10.2%. The same three players are in the same order for ’25, with Acuña and Soto maintaining the top two spots in that order through ’29, as far as the exercise ran.
I’ll return to the Acuña-Soto battle in a moment, but having teased it long enough, here’s the full Acuña projection:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | .281 | .389 | .562 | 570 | 134 | 161 | 43 | 115 | 91 | 171 | 33 | 147 | 4 | 6.5 |
| 2022 | .285 | .396 | .594 | 562 | 136 | 160 | 46 | 121 | 94 | 173 | 33 | 155 | 4 | 7.0 |
| 2023 | .277 | .394 | .584 | 555 | 135 | 154 | 45 | 117 | 97 | 176 | 34 | 152 | 3 | 7.5 |
| 2024 | .275 | .395 | .585 | 550 | 134 | 151 | 45 | 116 | 100 | 179 | 30 | 152 | 3 | 6.7 |
| 2025 | .275 | .400 | .586 | 541 | 135 | 149 | 45 | 117 | 103 | 178 | 27 | 154 | 3 | 6.8 |
| 2026 | .268 | .394 | .573 | 527 | 129 | 141 | 43 | 110 | 101 | 177 | 25 | 150 | 2 | 6.3 |
| 2027 | .270 | .396 | .566 | 512 | 125 | 138 | 40 | 105 | 99 | 164 | 23 | 149 | 2 | 6.0 |
| 2028 | .270 | .394 | .563 | 496 | 119 | 134 | 38 | 100 | 93 | 152 | 20 | 147 | 2 | 5.6 |
| 2029 | .268 | .391 | .542 | 478 | 111 | 128 | 34 | 93 | 88 | 141 | 17 | 142 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2030 | .265 | .383 | .527 | 457 | 103 | 121 | 31 | 85 | 80 | 129 | 15 | 136 | 1 | 4.3 |
| 2031 | .257 | .373 | .486 | 436 | 92 | 112 | 25 | 73 | 73 | 115 | 13 | 123 | 0 | 3.2 |
| 2032 | .255 | .365 | .468 | 400 | 81 | 102 | 21 | 64 | 63 | 99 | 12 | 117 | 0 | 2.4 |
| 2033 | .253 | .357 | .441 | 367 | 70 | 93 | 17 | 54 | 54 | 86 | 9 | 109 | -1 | 1.7 |
| 2034 | .249 | .346 | .420 | 338 | 61 | 84 | 14 | 46 | 45 | 74 | 7 | 100 | -2 | 1.0 |
| 2035 | .242 | .330 | .383 | 277 | 46 | 67 | 9 | 34 | 33 | 56 | 4 | 87 | -3 | 0.1 |
| 2036 | .240 | .323 | .368 | 171 | 26 | 41 | 5 | 19 | 18 | 32 | 2 | 81 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Ages 23-38 | .268 | .383 | .534 | 7237 | 1637 | 1936 | 501 | 1369 | 1232 | 2102 | 304 | 138 | 17 | 70.0 |
| Thru Age 22 | .281 | .371 | .538 | 1219 | 251 | 342 | 81 | 194 | 159 | 371 | 61 | 133 | 20 | 12.1 |
| Total Thru 38 | .269 | .381 | .534 | 8456 | 1888 | 2278 | 582 | 1563 | 1391 | 2473 | 365 | 137 | 37 | 82.1 |
Whew, those are some monster numbers. Acuña projects to be a 6–7.5 win player through the remainder of his 20s, bashing 40 or more homers a year and stealing upwards of 20 bags. While he projects to strike out more often than any player besides Reggie Jackson (2,597) and Jim Thome (2,548) by the end of this stretch, he also projects to post a home run total in their orbit; his 582 dingers would rank 12th all time, one short of Mark McGwire and three rungs ahead of Jackson (563). In fact, he projects to join Bonds, Rodriguez, and Mays as the only players to reach both 500 homers and 300 stolen bases.
With 82.1 career WAR and 46.8 peak WAR, Acuña’s 64.5 JAWS would rank eighth between Al Kaline (70.8) and Jackson (60.4), though by then Betts figures to be in the neighborhood as well. Through seven seasons, two of them partial (his 52-game rookie campaign and last year), the Dodgers’ star already has the 11th-highest peak score among right fielders (45.4) and would climb to ninth with a comparatively modest 5.0 WAR this year. Soto, if he stays in right, would climb into the top 10, too.
The Acuña-Soto head-to-head battle now tilts in the Washingtonian’s favor:
| Year | Soto OPS+ | Soto WAR | Acuña OPS+ | Acuña WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 160 | 6.3 | 147 | 6.5 |
| 2022 | 172 | 7.0 | 155 | 7.0 |
| 2023 | 178 | 7.5 | 152 | 7.5 |
| 2024 | 176 | 7.4 | 152 | 6.7 |
| 2025 | 179 | 7.5 | 154 | 6.8 |
| 2026 | 180 | 7.5 | 150 | 6.3 |
| 2027 | 179 | 7.1 | 149 | 6.0 |
| 2028 | 173 | 6.5 | 147 | 5.6 |
| 2029 | 172 | 6.1 | 142 | 5.0 |
| 2030 | 167 | 5.5 | 136 | 4.3 |
| 2031 | 156 | 4.6 | 123 | 3.2 |
| 2032 | 148 | 3.6 | 117 | 2.4 |
| 2033 | 136 | 2.5 | 109 | 1.7 |
| 2034 | 125 | 1.6 | 100 | 1.0 |
| 2035 | 113 | 0.7 | 87 | 0.1 |
| 2036 | 81 | -0.2 | ||
| Total | 163 | 91.0 | 137 | 82.1 |
Presumably, Soto now has the better odds of overtaking Trout in Dan’s long-term outlook, but all of this is subject to change as these players actually do the things that make us care about them enough to wade into these numbers in the first place.
Like Soto and Tatis, Acuña is off to a tremendous start that has already placed his name in the pantheon alongside some of baseball’s all-time greats, and the odds — remember, that’s a median projection above, based on a career that’s already 1,404 plate appearances deep — suggest his road will lead to Cooperstown, too. I’ve said this before, but it’s going to be a thrill to watch these careers unfold.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
I’d never sleep on Acuna. Somebody cushier, like Vladdy Jr., maybe.
Nice synergy with your user name.
LOL at Jose Ramirez appearing in that Power-Speed list. Most of the names there are the guys I think of when I think of the most aesthetically apparent super athletes that I’ve seen in baseball. I mean, Davis, Strawberry, Hanley, A-Rod, Trout, Beltran are all just the archetypes of tall, strong, fast studs. And then there’s little ol’ muffin top Jose Ramirez right in the middle of it all.
Mookie Betts, too. Mookie Betts is actually not that fast, but his instincts are so good. And like Ramirez, they have such amazing hand-eye coordination that they benefit from the live balls. I’m curious to see whether deadening the ball affects them more than others.
I think there’s a typo in the Acuna projections – as much as I’d love to see him slug .854, i dont think that’s a particularly realistic projection lol
Indeed, that’s a typo. .584 is the figure
Any article that prompts me to remember Eric Davis is a good article.
This list has monster strength guys who also happen to be really fast (Trout, A-Rod, probably Acuna), and lightning fast guys who happen to have sneaky strength (Davis, Mays). It’s weird to think of Davis as being in the same “class” as Mays because Mays was so gifted defensively and Davis wasn’t at all, and because Mays played forever and Davis was beset by a series of serious medical setbacks. But Davis was such a transcendent talent offensively.
I wouldn’t say that Davis wasn’t gifted at all defensively. He was actually above average when fully healthy, which was pretty rare. A lot in common with Fred Lynn in that regard.
Eric Davis is the reason I got into baseball and the reason I’m a Reds fan despite never even having visited Cin.
I didn’t even know people slept on Acuna. I’m still astounded he got the contract he did in comparison to Tatis and what Soto will get.
It’s not astounding he got that contract, but that he signed it. They must put some good stuff in the tea in the Braves clubhouse. Acuna and Albies, just wow.
Those two contracts are incredibly suspicious given that they were both given to players who joined the organization smack in the middle of when the Braves were monkeying around with the IFA market.
Ozzie Albies signed in 2013, and Ronald Acuña Jr. signed in 2014. The investigation was conducted and penalties were issued in November 2017 for actions that the Braves made in 2015-2017, while John Coppolella was the general manager.
Neither Albies’s or Acuña’s contracts were among those questioned. The contracts signed in 2019 weren’t suspicious at all.
Coppolella was the Assistant GM when both players signed. Whatever the period of time they officially were punished for, it’s not like the dude was far from the throne when those dudes came on. In fact, he had been the Director of Professional Scouting right before then.
What does this mean, exactly? Are you speculating about some kind of handshake agreement that they made as teenagers to sign long-term contracts for below market value? Why on earth would they follow through on that commitment as established major leaguers, when it’s obviously unenforceable?
Honestly, people just turn off their brains when they talk about this scandal. The Braves were penalized for going outside the rules to give more money to international free agents, in violation of the owners’ cartel agreement to hold down total compensation to incredibly poor Latin American kids. Obviously Copallela didn’t do it from altruistic motives and he knew the consequences, but can we stop pretending that the victims here were the players, as opposed to billionaire owners?
Spot on. This type of tinfoil hat nonsense usually would be downvoted to oblivion, but somehow it is somewhat accepted. Acuña’s contract was a huge win for the Braves, but really the compensation rules for pre-free agency did most of the lifting. Acuña was in fact the first player with under one year of service time to get a 9-figure guarantee. Sure, you’d think the Braves would have still said yes if, for example, there was one fewer option year. But given the realities of the rules, it wasn’t wildly off base. Albies, on the other hand, made no sense, but to believe it related to the international signing fiasco is ridiculous. Also, the Braves got punished for cheating in a slightly different and more blatant way than other teams cheat. Those people were gone by the time the extensions were signed anyway. Coppy wasn’t even the GM on the front *or* backend of this crazy conspiracy theory. Ludicrous, seriously.
It’s not astounding. Atlanta was the team that had confidence in him enough to pay him as a 16 year old in Venezuela, and Acuña has never forgotten that.
People forget that Acuna signed the contract extension in the offseason after he injured his knee in a freak accident. He went from worrying that he might have a career-altering injury to playing a few weeks later. That can sharpen someone’s feeling that this could all just go away in a bad minute. Atlanta offered him the security of a money-up-front contract, and he took the deal.
Albies’s contract is such that Atlanta would have to be crazy to trade him. Which was what was important to him.
Acuna hurt his knee in May 2018. He signed the contract in April 2019. Players get minor injuries literally all the time. I doubt a few weeks on the DL a year before caused him to decide to forgo a couple hundred million dollars.
And that Albies explanation just doesn’t make any sense. “I want to stay with this team, so I’m going to take an extension for vastly less than I should get.” Who thinks that way? There are much much easier ways to stay with a team than to accept $70 or $80 million less than your market value.
It wasn’t a minor injury for Acuña. It was a real scare at the time. When watching the video, you can see where his knee hyperextends. The MRI revealed a left knee mild ACL sprain and a left knee contusion. He was lucky it wasn’t worse. “I have no regrets,” Acuna said. “Nobody can see in the future. Nobody can see what will happen tomorrow. I’m extremely happy with the decision we all made.”
Apparently Ozzie Albies thinks that way. “I don’t look at it just from money because I’m not playing for money. I’m playing for my career. I took it because I want my family to be safe.”
I’m not saying that I think these were good contracts. They weren’t. But these were among the reasons Albies and Acuña expressed at the time for why they took them.
I love Zips and also I’m biased as a Braves fan, but it sure feels like 10 months of age difference is doing a whole lot of heavy lifting. Acuña and Soto have played the same number of games (exactly!) and Acuña is slightly better by fWAR (0.7) but more comfortably by bWAR (2.3). But also, and I’m somewhat repeating myself for a similar Soto/Tatis argument, there is just a lot more areas for adding value for Acuña. I mean, how much better could Soto possibly hit? If he continues to suck at defense and underwhelm on the bases, there’s just less ceiling there than there is for a player that could get value in every way, like Acuña (or Tatis). Other than roided up Barry Bonds, I’m not sure a bat-only corner outfielder has been the best player in baseball since Ted Williams. Then again, maybe Soto is the next Ted Williams?
> I mean, how much better could Soto possibly hit?
As a fellow Braves fan, please don’t tempt fate like this.
Lol, if he is the next Ted Williams, he won’t post a sub-200 wRC+ again until his age-29 season. That would be tough bar for Acuna (or Tatis, or Franco…..) to surpass.
Well, that was my point, basically.
I’ve had the same feeling, and ZiPS seems to be quite optimistic about Soto’s defense given where he’s been at early in his career. Repeating my comment from the article about his career projections, he’s currently at -15 through his age 21 season (including 2020, in which he played only 47 games), but is projected to be “only” -76 from ages 22-38. That would not seem to track. He’s already a left fielder, is plenty big, and is going to get bigger.
Soto looks like Miggy v2 or 2.0 to me, whichever you prefer. Miggy was pretty much the idealized version of the player who crushes at the plate, but is about as bad as it gets on the field. Which is why the average Miggy stud season was in the 5-6 WAR range, with a few spikes above that. Soto will have to hit an awful lot to keep it up in the 7+ WAR range if his defense continues to be where it’s been at early in his career, or gets worse.
I commented on your March 12th article about Soto asking for an ability to independently research Acuna ZIP results through 2035 and you have created those exact results in this article… feeling like a prayer has been answered by the baseball gods. Thank you @jay_jaffe!