Do Not Sleep on Ronald Acuña Jr.

Between the fireworks shows put on by 21-year-olds Juan Soto and Fernando Tatis Jr., and the big numbers put up by teammates Freddie Freeman and Marcell Ozuna, Ronald Acuña Jr. didn’t command as much attention as his talents merited last year. A two-week stay on the injured list didn’t help, particularly when it came to posting eye-opening counting stats. Even so, and even in abbreviated form, Acuña turned in his third straight stellar campaign. As he heads into his age-23 season, his place among the game’s elite shouldn’t be ignored.

Acuña entered the 2020 season on a high note, following up his 2018 NL Rookie of the Year campaign with his first as an All-Star. Playing in 156 games in 2019, he hit .280/.365/.518 (126 wRC+), bashed 41 homers and stole a league-high 37 bases in 46 attempts; three more steals, and he would have joined Barry Bonds, Jose Canseco, Alex Rodriguez, and Alfonso Soriano as the only members of the 40–40 club. Back in the Baseball Abstract days, Bill James introduced a simple stat called Power-Speed number, which takes the harmonic mean of a player’s home run and stolen base totals. Acuña’s 2019 season is tied for 16th overall, and sixth among players 25 or under:

Top Power-Speed Numbers by Players 25 and Under
Player Tm Year Age HR SB PSN
Alex Rodriguez SEA 1998 22 42 46 43.91
Eric Davis CIN 1987 25 37 50 42.53
Jose Canseco OAK 1988 23 42 40 40.98
Barry Bonds PIT 1990 25 33 52 40.38
Eric Davis CIN 1986 24 27 80 40.37
Ronald Acuña Jr. ATL 2019 21 41 37 38.90
Willie Mays NYG 1956 25 36 40 37.89
Darryl Strawberry NYM 1987 25 39 36 37.44
Bobby Bonds SFG 1969 23 32 45 37.40
Mike Trout LAA 2012 20 30 49 37.22
Hanley Ramirez FLA 2007 23 29 51 36.98
José Ramírez CLE 2018 25 39 34 36.33
Cesar Cedeno HOU 1974 23 26 57 35.71
Grady Sizemore CLE 2008 25 33 38 35.32
Ryne Sandberg CHC 1985 25 26 54 35.10
Shawn Green TOR 1998 25 35 35 35.00
Cesar Cedeno HOU 1973 22 25 56 34.57
Sammy Sosa CHC 1993 24 33 36 34.43
Hanley Ramirez FLA 2008 24 33 35 33.97
Bobby Bonds SFG 1970 24 26 48 33.73
Preston Wilson FLA 2000 25 31 36 33.31
Mike Schmidt PHI 1975 25 38 29 32.90
Ron Gant ATL 1990 25 32 33 32.49
David Wright NYM 2007 24 30 34 31.88
Carlos Beltran KCR 2002 25 29 35 31.72
Trevor Story COL 2018 25 37 27 31.22
Mookie Betts BOS 2018 25 32 30 30.97
Francisco Lindor CLE 2018 24 38 25 30.16
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
Power/Speed Number, a stat introduced by Bill James in 1980, is the harmonic mean of home run and stolen base totals. PSN = 2 x (HR x SB)/(SB + HR).

Those are some of the most electrifying seasons ever put together by young players. Landing between the more extreme of Davis’ two amazing seasons and a Mays one — well, that is some damn company. It’s also quite frankly far more interesting than Acuña’s 5.6 WAR ranking eighth in the NL that season and ninth among all seasons by position players 21 and under in the post-1960 expansion era.

Acuña’s 2020 season wasn’t quite as electrifying. In fact, he started quite slowly, going just 5-for-33 with 17 strikeouts and no homers through his first eight games before heating up over his next 11 games with four homers. Alas, he was scratched from the Braves’ lineup on August 11 due to soreness in his left wrist and wound up missing 10 games for what was diagnosed merely as inflammation, a problem he believed stemmed from an awkward dive into a base. He homered in his first game back on August 26, off the Yankees’ Gerrit Cole, but after five games was sidelined again for a few days due to right hamstring tightness. Upon returning to the lineup, he homered three times in a doubleheader and once the next day, and he didn’t miss another game.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Acuña finished the season with a .250/.406/.582 line. His batting average was atypically low, 35 points worse than what he’d done in 2018–19, but he hit the ball harder than ever. His 92.4 mph average exit velocity, 16% barrel rate, .425 xwOBA, and 57% hard-hit rate all placed in the 91st percentile to the 98th percentile.

Acuña did that while swinging at a career-low 40.7% of pitches (down from the 45–46% range in his first two seasons), with his swing rate in the strike zone dropping about seven points to 60.3% and his swing rate out of the zone falling about two points to 21.1%. Protecting his wrist may have been a factor, given that Braves general manager Alex Anthopoulos told the media it was still sore throughout the postseason (recall him aggravating the wrist after taking a tumble while legging out an infield hit in NLCS Game 4, after which he went 1-for-12 with two walks). Acuña’s rolling swing rate doesn’t line up perfectly with the reported injury, but he definitely swung less later in the season:

I included 2019 for comparison; Acuña’s only time in 2020 above his two-year average (the dotted line) was the period between his two absences. Anyway, via his more disciplined approach, his walk rate spiked to 18.8%, which ranked third in the NL and was about eight points higher than 2019. His .406 on-base percentage and .581 slugging percentage both represented career bests and ranked seventh and eighth in the league, respectively. His 2.4 WAR was tied for eighth and his 14 homers was tied for 12th — that despite missing just under a quarter of the season.

With Freeman hitting .341/.462/.640 with a league-high 3.3 WAR en route to the NL MVP award and a second-place finish behind Soto in all three slash stats, and Ozuna leading the league in homers (18), RBI (56), and total bases (145), Acuña was merely the third-most productive Braves hitter. It felt as though he didn’t capture the public imagination as a prodigy the way that the 21-year-old Soto and Tatis did. A 22-year-old veteran doing those things? Old news.

Given the eight-year, $100 million extension that he signed in April 2019, Acuña certainly isn’t lined up to be paid like Tatis, who signed a 14-year, $340 million extension last month, or Soto, whom the Nationals reportedly plan to offer a long-term extension, if they haven’t already. The latter, who has 25 days less service time than Acuña (two years and 134 days to two and 159), is making $8.5 million going year-to-year. Acuña, meanwhile, will be paid a fraction of what he’s projected to be worth during his mid- and late 20s thanks to a deal that former colleague Craig Edwards called “hard to fully comprehend,” as he signed away two to four seasons of free agency (the last two are club options) for which he’ll earn just $17 million per year.

That said, I’m not here to rehash that contract, as exasperating as it is. I’m here because I’ve been dreaming on Acuña since drawing the right field assignment in our annual Positional Power Rankings and trying to place him in the context of the aforementioned whippersnappers, whose long-term projections I’ve examined at length. Before getting to the whole thing, I’ll note that ZiPS projects him to be worth 5.9 WAR in 2021, the fourth-highest total in the majors behind Trout (6.7), Alex Bregman (6.0), and Betts (6.0), with Soto just below him at 5.7. Steamer doesn’t hold him in quite as high regard, with his 5.3 WAR there ranking ninth, but in our Depth Charts projections, which averages the two systems with manual adjustments for playing time, he’s in a virtual tie for fifth with José Ramírez at 5.7 WAR.

Dan Szymborski recently published ZiPS projections for 2022 and ’23 to go with this year’s, and that’s where the fun really starts:

Three-Year ZiPS Projection Leaders
Player 2021 Age 2021 WAR 2022 WAR 2023 WAR Total
Juan Soto 22 5.7 6.6 7.0 19.3
Mike Trout 29 6.7 6.5 5.9 19.1
Ronald Acuña Jr. 23 5.9 6.5 6.2 18.6
Alex Bregman 27 6.0 5.7 5.5 17.2
Mookie Betts 28 6.0 5.7 5.5 17.2
Cody Bellinger 25 5.4 5.4 5.2 16.0
José Ramírez 28 5.7 5.2 5.0 15.9
Francisco Lindor 27 5.1 4.9 4.6 14.6
Matt Chapman 28 5.0 4.7 4.8 14.5
Fernando Tatis Jr. 22 5.1 4.9 4.6 14.0
Trea Turner 28 4.7 4.4 4.3 13.4
Ozzie Albies 24 4.1 4.5 4.7 13.3
Corey Seager 27 4.6 4.4 4.3 13.3
Gleyber Torres 24 4.4 4.3 4.6 13.3
Bo Bichette 23 4.0 4.5 4.7 13.2

Oh hello, guy who’s within a win of Soto and Trout over a three-year period.

This actually shouldn’t be too big of a surprise if you’ve been following Dan’s work, because ZiPS loves Acuña. A year ago this month, just before the world fell apart, Dan examined the likely candidates to overtake Trout as the game’s best player as measured by projected WAR. He found Lindor to have the best chance of passing Trout in his projections in both 2021 and ’22, albeit with just a 9.7% chance in the former year and 11.7% chance in the latter. That didn’t come to pass, as Lindor failed to light the world on fire in the pandemic-shortened season. Come 2024, however, the projections showed Acuña with an 18.8% chance of having the game’s highest projected WAR, ahead of Trout’s 16.1%, with Soto third at 10.2%. The same three players are in the same order for ’25, with Acuña and Soto maintaining the top two spots in that order through ’29, as far as the exercise ran.

I’ll return to the Acuña-Soto battle in a moment, but having teased it long enough, here’s the full Acuña projection:

ZiPS Projections – Ronald Acuña Jr.
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ DR WAR
2021 .281 .389 .562 570 134 161 43 115 91 171 33 147 4 6.5
2022 .285 .396 .594 562 136 160 46 121 94 173 33 155 4 7.0
2023 .277 .394 .584 555 135 154 45 117 97 176 34 152 3 7.5
2024 .275 .395 .585 550 134 151 45 116 100 179 30 152 3 6.7
2025 .275 .400 .586 541 135 149 45 117 103 178 27 154 3 6.8
2026 .268 .394 .573 527 129 141 43 110 101 177 25 150 2 6.3
2027 .270 .396 .566 512 125 138 40 105 99 164 23 149 2 6.0
2028 .270 .394 .563 496 119 134 38 100 93 152 20 147 2 5.6
2029 .268 .391 .542 478 111 128 34 93 88 141 17 142 1 5.0
2030 .265 .383 .527 457 103 121 31 85 80 129 15 136 1 4.3
2031 .257 .373 .486 436 92 112 25 73 73 115 13 123 0 3.2
2032 .255 .365 .468 400 81 102 21 64 63 99 12 117 0 2.4
2033 .253 .357 .441 367 70 93 17 54 54 86 9 109 -1 1.7
2034 .249 .346 .420 338 61 84 14 46 45 74 7 100 -2 1.0
2035 .242 .330 .383 277 46 67 9 34 33 56 4 87 -3 0.1
2036 .240 .323 .368 171 26 41 5 19 18 32 2 81 -3 -0.2
Ages 23-38 .268 .383 .534 7237 1637 1936 501 1369 1232 2102 304 138 17 70.0
Thru Age 22 .281 .371 .538 1219 251 342 81 194 159 371 61 133 20 12.1
Total Thru 38 .269 .381 .534 8456 1888 2278 582 1563 1391 2473 365 137 37 82.1

Whew, those are some monster numbers. Acuña projects to be a 6–7.5 win player through the remainder of his 20s, bashing 40 or more homers a year and stealing upwards of 20 bags. While he projects to strike out more often than any player besides Reggie Jackson (2,597) and Jim Thome (2,548) by the end of this stretch, he also projects to post a home run total in their orbit; his 582 dingers would rank 12th all time, one short of Mark McGwire and three rungs ahead of Jackson (563). In fact, he projects to join Bonds, Rodriguez, and Mays as the only players to reach both 500 homers and 300 stolen bases.

With 82.1 career WAR and 46.8 peak WAR, Acuña’s 64.5 JAWS would rank eighth between Al Kaline (70.8) and Jackson (60.4), though by then Betts figures to be in the neighborhood as well. Through seven seasons, two of them partial (his 52-game rookie campaign and last year), the Dodgers’ star already has the 11th-highest peak score among right fielders (45.4) and would climb to ninth with a comparatively modest 5.0 WAR this year. Soto, if he stays in right, would climb into the top 10, too.

The Acuña-Soto head-to-head battle now tilts in the Washingtonian’s favor:

ZiPS Projections — Soto vs. Acuña
Year Soto OPS+ Soto WAR Acuña OPS+ Acuña WAR
2021 160 6.3 147 6.5
2022 172 7.0 155 7.0
2023 178 7.5 152 7.5
2024 176 7.4 152 6.7
2025 179 7.5 154 6.8
2026 180 7.5 150 6.3
2027 179 7.1 149 6.0
2028 173 6.5 147 5.6
2029 172 6.1 142 5.0
2030 167 5.5 136 4.3
2031 156 4.6 123 3.2
2032 148 3.6 117 2.4
2033 136 2.5 109 1.7
2034 125 1.6 100 1.0
2035 113 0.7 87 0.1
2036 81 -0.2
Total 163 91.0 137 82.1

Presumably, Soto now has the better odds of overtaking Trout in Dan’s long-term outlook, but all of this is subject to change as these players actually do the things that make us care about them enough to wade into these numbers in the first place.

Like Soto and Tatis, Acuña is off to a tremendous start that has already placed his name in the pantheon alongside some of baseball’s all-time greats, and the odds — remember, that’s a median projection above, based on a career that’s already 1,404 plate appearances deep — suggest his road will lead to Cooperstown, too. I’ve said this before, but it’s going to be a thrill to watch these careers unfold.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Shirtless Bartolo Colon
5 years ago

I’d never sleep on Acuna. Somebody cushier, like Vladdy Jr., maybe.

Nick SmithMember since 2017
5 years ago

Nice synergy with your user name.

CC AFCMember since 2016
5 years ago

LOL at Jose Ramirez appearing in that Power-Speed list. Most of the names there are the guys I think of when I think of the most aesthetically apparent super athletes that I’ve seen in baseball. I mean, Davis, Strawberry, Hanley, A-Rod, Trout, Beltran are all just the archetypes of tall, strong, fast studs. And then there’s little ol’ muffin top Jose Ramirez right in the middle of it all.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Mookie Betts, too. Mookie Betts is actually not that fast, but his instincts are so good. And like Ramirez, they have such amazing hand-eye coordination that they benefit from the live balls. I’m curious to see whether deadening the ball affects them more than others.

joelarbearMember since 2020
5 years ago

I think there’s a typo in the Acuna projections – as much as I’d love to see him slug .854, i dont think that’s a particularly realistic projection lol

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

Any article that prompts me to remember Eric Davis is a good article.

This list has monster strength guys who also happen to be really fast (Trout, A-Rod, probably Acuna), and lightning fast guys who happen to have sneaky strength (Davis, Mays). It’s weird to think of Davis as being in the same “class” as Mays because Mays was so gifted defensively and Davis wasn’t at all, and because Mays played forever and Davis was beset by a series of serious medical setbacks. But Davis was such a transcendent talent offensively.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I wouldn’t say that Davis wasn’t gifted at all defensively. He was actually above average when fully healthy, which was pretty rare. A lot in common with Fred Lynn in that regard.

wubbie075
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Eric Davis is the reason I got into baseball and the reason I’m a Reds fan despite never even having visited Cin.

r24j
5 years ago

I didn’t even know people slept on Acuna. I’m still astounded he got the contract he did in comparison to Tatis and what Soto will get.

wubbie075
5 years ago
Reply to  r24j

It’s not astounding he got that contract, but that he signed it. They must put some good stuff in the tea in the Braves clubhouse. Acuna and Albies, just wow.

synco
5 years ago
Reply to  wubbie075

Those two contracts are incredibly suspicious given that they were both given to players who joined the organization smack in the middle of when the Braves were monkeying around with the IFA market.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  synco

Ozzie Albies signed in 2013, and Ronald Acuña Jr. signed in 2014. The investigation was conducted and penalties were issued in November 2017 for actions that the Braves made in 2015-2017, while John Coppolella was the general manager.

Neither Albies’s or Acuña’s contracts were among those questioned. The contracts signed in 2019 weren’t suspicious at all.

synco
5 years ago
Reply to  hughduffy

Coppolella was the Assistant GM when both players signed. Whatever the period of time they officially were punished for, it’s not like the dude was far from the throne when those dudes came on. In fact, he had been the Director of Professional Scouting right before then.

Anon21Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  synco

What does this mean, exactly? Are you speculating about some kind of handshake agreement that they made as teenagers to sign long-term contracts for below market value? Why on earth would they follow through on that commitment as established major leaguers, when it’s obviously unenforceable?

Honestly, people just turn off their brains when they talk about this scandal. The Braves were penalized for going outside the rules to give more money to international free agents, in violation of the owners’ cartel agreement to hold down total compensation to incredibly poor Latin American kids. Obviously Copallela didn’t do it from altruistic motives and he knew the consequences, but can we stop pretending that the victims here were the players, as opposed to billionaire owners?

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

Spot on. This type of tinfoil hat nonsense usually would be downvoted to oblivion, but somehow it is somewhat accepted. Acuña’s contract was a huge win for the Braves, but really the compensation rules for pre-free agency did most of the lifting. Acuña was in fact the first player with under one year of service time to get a 9-figure guarantee. Sure, you’d think the Braves would have still said yes if, for example, there was one fewer option year. But given the realities of the rules, it wasn’t wildly off base. Albies, on the other hand, made no sense, but to believe it related to the international signing fiasco is ridiculous. Also, the Braves got punished for cheating in a slightly different and more blatant way than other teams cheat. Those people were gone by the time the extensions were signed anyway. Coppy wasn’t even the GM on the front *or* backend of this crazy conspiracy theory. Ludicrous, seriously.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  wubbie075

It’s not astounding. Atlanta was the team that had confidence in him enough to pay him as a 16 year old in Venezuela, and Acuña has never forgotten that.

People forget that Acuna signed the contract extension in the offseason after he injured his knee in a freak accident. He went from worrying that he might have a career-altering injury to playing a few weeks later. That can sharpen someone’s feeling that this could all just go away in a bad minute. Atlanta offered him the security of a money-up-front contract, and he took the deal.

Albies’s contract is such that Atlanta would have to be crazy to trade him. Which was what was important to him.

synco
5 years ago
Reply to  hughduffy

Acuna hurt his knee in May 2018. He signed the contract in April 2019. Players get minor injuries literally all the time. I doubt a few weeks on the DL a year before caused him to decide to forgo a couple hundred million dollars.

And that Albies explanation just doesn’t make any sense. “I want to stay with this team, so I’m going to take an extension for vastly less than I should get.” Who thinks that way? There are much much easier ways to stay with a team than to accept $70 or $80 million less than your market value.

hughduffy
5 years ago
Reply to  synco

It wasn’t a minor injury for Acuña. It was a real scare at the time. When watching the video, you can see where his knee hyperextends. The MRI revealed a left knee mild ACL sprain and a left knee contusion. He was lucky it wasn’t worse. “I have no regrets,” Acuna said. “Nobody can see in the future. Nobody can see what will happen tomorrow. I’m extremely happy with the decision we all made.”

Apparently Ozzie Albies thinks that way. “I don’t look at it just from money because I’m not playing for money. I’m playing for my career. I took it because I want my family to be safe.”

I’m not saying that I think these were good contracts. They weren’t. But these were among the reasons Albies and Acuña expressed at the time for why they took them.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

I love Zips and also I’m biased as a Braves fan, but it sure feels like 10 months of age difference is doing a whole lot of heavy lifting. Acuña and Soto have played the same number of games (exactly!) and Acuña is slightly better by fWAR (0.7) but more comfortably by bWAR (2.3). But also, and I’m somewhat repeating myself for a similar Soto/Tatis argument, there is just a lot more areas for adding value for Acuña. I mean, how much better could Soto possibly hit? If he continues to suck at defense and underwhelm on the bases, there’s just less ceiling there than there is for a player that could get value in every way, like Acuña (or Tatis). Other than roided up Barry Bonds, I’m not sure a bat-only corner outfielder has been the best player in baseball since Ted Williams. Then again, maybe Soto is the next Ted Williams?

vslykeMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

> I mean, how much better could Soto possibly hit?

As a fellow Braves fan, please don’t tempt fate like this.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  vslyke

Lol, if he is the next Ted Williams, he won’t post a sub-200 wRC+ again until his age-29 season. That would be tough bar for Acuna (or Tatis, or Franco…..) to surpass.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Well, that was my point, basically.

synco
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I’ve had the same feeling, and ZiPS seems to be quite optimistic about Soto’s defense given where he’s been at early in his career. Repeating my comment from the article about his career projections, he’s currently at -15 through his age 21 season (including 2020, in which he played only 47 games), but is projected to be “only” -76 from ages 22-38. That would not seem to track. He’s already a left fielder, is plenty big, and is going to get bigger.

Soto looks like Miggy v2 or 2.0 to me, whichever you prefer. Miggy was pretty much the idealized version of the player who crushes at the plate, but is about as bad as it gets on the field. Which is why the average Miggy stud season was in the 5-6 WAR range, with a few spikes above that. Soto will have to hit an awful lot to keep it up in the 7+ WAR range if his defense continues to be where it’s been at early in his career, or gets worse.

jlawyaMember since 2019
5 years ago

I commented on your March 12th article about Soto asking for an ability to independently research Acuna ZIP results through 2035 and you have created those exact results in this article… feeling like a prayer has been answered by the baseball gods. Thank you @jay_jaffe!