Dodgers Land Their Impact Starter in Jack Flaherty

Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

Last week, when the Dodgers designated lefty starter James Paxton for assignment, general manager Brandon Gomes spoke of the team targeting “an impact-type arm” ahead of the trade deadline. Gomes and president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman hit their target shortly before the 6 p.m. ET deadline on Tuesday, landing Tigers righty Jack Flaherty in exchange for a pair of prospects. Separately, the Dodgers also fortified their outfield depth by acquiring Kevin Kiermaier from the Blue Jays for lefty Ryan Yarbrough.

For all the talk about the top-of-the-line starters who could be moved before the deadline, the most discussed ones besides Flaherty — the Tigers’ Tarik Skubal, the Giants’ Blake Snell, and the White Sox’s Garrett Crochet — all stayed put, making the Dodgers’ addition of the 28-year-old Flaherty feel that much more impactful. To acquire the Los Angeles native — who was traded on deadline day for the second year in a row, after being dealt from the Cardinals to the Orioles last August 1 — the Dodgers parted with 21-year-old catcher Thayron Liranzo and 24-year-old shortstop Trey Sweeney.

After years of injuries capped by a subpar campaign that included the aforementioned change of address, Flaherty is in the midst of his best season in half a decade. Because he’s skipped a couple of turns due to injections of painkillers (not cortisone) to address recurrent lower back pain (one on June 10, the second on July 2) and then had Monday’s turn scratched in anticipation of his being dealt, his 106.2 innings is 1.1 short of the threshold to qualify for the ERA title, but his numbers are impressive. Among AL pitchers with at least 100 innings, he ranks seventh with a 2.95 ERA and sixth with a 3.11 FIP. Among all AL pitchers, he’s tied for 11th with 2.5 WAR, and among the pitchers traded this month, he’s second only to the more contact-oriented Erick Fedde (2.7). Flaherty’s numbers are a huge improvement from last year’s 4.96 ERA and 4.36 FIP in 144.1 innings. While putting up a 6.75 ERA post-trade, he was bumped from the Orioles’ rotation in mid-September and finished the season in the bullpen.

The major positive for Flaherty’s 2023 season was his health. His 27 starts were his most in a season since 2019; he totaled just 32 from 2020–22 due to the pandemic-shortened season, an oblique strain, and recurrent shoulder woes, which combined to send him to the 60-day injured list three times in that span. That better health — and some post-trade improvement of his fastball, albeit with his slider and curve regressing somewhat — helped him net a one-year, $14 million deal from the Tigers, with another $1 million possible via performance bonuses ($250,000 apiece for reaching 26 and 28 starts, $500,000 for reaching 30).

As I noted when I checked in on Flaherty about six weeks ago, the most surprising aspect of his performance is his career-high 32% strikeout rate, second only to Crochet among AL pitchers with 100 innings. It’s 2.1 percentage points ahead of his previous personal best, set in 2019, and 9.2 points ahead of last year’s mark, making it the majors’ biggest year-to-year jump:

Largest Increases in Strikeout Rate, 2023–24
Pitcher 2023 K% 2024 K% Change
Jack Flaherty 22.8% 32.0% +9.3%
Sonny Gray 24.3% 30.6% +6.3%
Dylan Cease 27.3% 32.5% +5.2%
Cal Quantrill 13.1% 17.8% +4.7%
Brady Singer 18.9% 22.7% +3.7%
Carlos Carrasco 15.8% 19.3% +3.5%
Chris Sale 29.4% 32.7% +3.3%
Jake Irvin 18.7% 21.6% +2.9%
Austin Gomber 14.4% 17.0% +2.6%
Tanner Bibee 24.1% 26.7% +2.6%
Minimum 80 innings pitched in both 2023 and ’24. All statistics through July 29.

In addition to improving his strikeout rate, Flaherty is generating a 43% groundball rate, his highest since his 2017 rookie campaign. As I’ve noted before, I’m a big fan of that combo; a few years ago, while writing about Luis Castillo, I tapped into our then-new “Plus Stats” — specifically our league-indexed strikeout and groundball rates — to produce something called KGB+, a junk stat that shines a light on pitchers who combine strikeouts and groundballs. That’s generally a good strategy for success, if not the only route there. Flaherty is currently seventh in the majors by that measure:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
KGB+ Leaders
Pitcher Team IP K%+ GB%+ ERA- FIP- KGB+
Garrett Crochet CHW 114.1 154 113 79 56 267
Paul Skenes PIT 80.2 151 116 46 66 267
Chris Sale ATL 117.1 148 112 65 58 260
Tyler Glasnow LAD 114.0 149 111 87 72 260
Tarik Skubal DET 130.0 133 114 58 62 247
Jack Flaherty DET 106.2 143 104 72 76 246
Sonny Gray STL 111.2 139 103 95 72 241
Framber Valdez HOU 110.1 96 145 85 88 241
Taj Bradley TBR 81.1 134 104 63 86 238
Max Fried ATL 108.0 98 136 74 89 234
Dylan Cease SDP 131.0 147 85 90 77 233
Tanner Houck BOS 129.0 97 134 65 70 231
José Soriano LAA 97.2 87 143 89 96 230
Ranger Suárez PHI 119.1 109 121 70 73 230
Nathan Eovaldi TEX 112.0 105 124 81 91 230
All statistics through July 29. Minimum 80 innings pitched. KGB+ = K%+ plus GB%+

Flaherty’s revival owes plenty to the offseason work he did with Tigers pitching coach Chris Fetter and assistant pitching coach Robin Lund, who helped him clean up his mechanics, improving his ability to repeat his delivery by focusing on his posterior gluteal muscles and hamstrings instead of his quadriceps. As he told the Detroit Free Press’ Evan Petzold in May, “It’s allowed me to have a little bit better velo and stay behind the ball and be a little bit more true on my heater… and then be able to repeat my slider over and over and throw it a little bit harder. I can just feel the sharpness of it when it leaves my hand, which is something last year I didn’t really feel.”

Under the direction of his new coaches, Flaherty also adjusted the grip of his slider and ditched the cutter he threw 9.1% of the time last year in favor of more four-seamers and sliders. He’s also increased the average velocity of his four-seamer by 0.4 mph (from 93.1 to 93.5) and of his slider by 0.6 mph (from 84.2 to 84.8). He’s getting a bit more ride and more break on the fastball, but a bit less movement in both planes on the slider. Relative to last year, he’s lowered the wOBA against his fastball by 68 points and against his two breaking pitches by 111 points. He’s generating whiff rates of 38.9% via his slider and 44.0% with his knuckle curve, and he’s been much more effective against both lefties (a drop in wOBA from .372 to .264) and righties (from .337 to .279).

In coming to the Dodgers, Flaherty joins a rotation that’s in considerable flux. Within the past week, they’ve DFA’d and then traded Paxton to the Red Sox, and activated both Glasnow and Clayton Kershaw from the injured list; the former had missed 18 days due to lower back tightness, while the latter hadn’t pitched since undergoing offseason shoulder surgery. During that same week-long span, rookies Gavin Stone (the staff savior thanks to his 3.34 ERA and 3.82 FIP), Landon Knack, Justin Wrobleski, and River Ryan have all taken turns, but Knack has already been optioned, and he won’t be the last one. The hope is that at some point in mid-August or later, Yoshinobu Yamamoto can return from a rotator cuff strain that’s sidelined him since June 15, and that Bobby Miller and/or Walker Buehler, both of whom were optioned after post-injury struggles, can help as well. If you’re sensing that the Dodgers have depth for days, you’re right. Sorting out who will start for them in a postseason series is one of the main tasks ahead for manger Dave Roberts.

All of that pitching made Yarbrough expendable, but since being acquired from the Royals at least year’s deadline, the soft-tossing 32-year-old southpaw had served the Dodgers reasonably well in a multi-inning relief role; this year, he’s pitched to a 3.74 ERA and 5.15 FIP in 32 appearances totaling 67.1 innings. He’ll join a Blue Jays squad that has been stripped for parts in the past week. The team has traded just about everything in Toronto that wasn’t nailed down, including starter Yusei Kikuchi, relievers Yimi García, Nate Pearson, and Trevor Richards, catcher Danny Jansen, first baseman/DH Justin Turner, utilityman Isiah Kiner-Falefa, and Kiermaier.

A four-time Gold Glove winner (and 2015 Platinum Glove winner), Kiermaier is now 34 years old and heading into the home stretch of his career, as he announced last week that he would retire at season’s end. He remains an exceptional defender; in just 549.1 innings in center field, he’s accumulated 9 DRS (tied for fourth in the majors, one run behind his now-former teammate Daulton Varsho) and 8 FRV (tied for fifth). He’s obviously a better defender than the Dodgers’ incumbent center fielder, rookie Andy Pages (-8 DRS, -1.6 UZR, -1 FRV), but the 23-year-old Pages has hit a comparatively robust .244/.297/.378 (92 wRC+), while Kiermaier has not hit a lick. His strikeout rate has spiked to a career-high 30.4%, his xSLG has dropped to a Statcast-era low of .277, and his 53 wRC+ (.195/.236/.310) is the seventh lowest among players with at least 200 PA. He’ll have to battle for playing time in an outfield that could soon be further crowded by Tommy Edman, who was acquired from the Cardinals on Monday and who can also play center once he returns from a rehab assignment, though he’s more likely to be deployed in the middle infield.

As for the two prospects the Dodgers sent to the Tigers, Liranzo is a 50-FV prospect who ranked fifth on the Dodgers’ updated list and 73rd on our updated Top 100 at the time of the trade, while Sweeney is a 40-FV prospect who ranked 24th on the Dodgers list. Playing at High-A Great Lakes, where he’s hit .220/.344/.356 (106 wRC+), the switch-hitting Liranzo — a 2021 signing out of the Dominican Republic, with a $30,000 bonus — has split his time between catching (44 games), first base (24 games), and DH (six games). His future at catcher is murky, as he’s got a below-average arm. In Liranzo’s prospect capsule on The Board, Eric Longenhagen had this to say:

When he can actually get a throw to the bag off, his Patrick Bailey-style sidearm release works ok, but he so often botches or fumbles his exchange that he doesn’t give himself a chance to get the runner. Liranzo mostly utilizes a traditional crouch when receiving and is a below-average framer and ball-blocker. Both those skills are more tenable and within the range of big league viability than his arm, but at Liranzo’s size and age, it’s no guarantee they’ll stay that way.

Despite that modest slash line, Longenhagen is more sanguine about the 6-foot-3, 195-pound Liranzo’s bat:

There is huge switch-hitting power here — Liranzo hit 24 bombs in the Cal League, hit a ball 114 mph, and had a 48% hard-hit rate last year. He can hit for power from the left side even when he isn’t taking his best swing, and he’s dangerous from the right side even though he uses super conservative footwork, generating everything with a shift in his weight and the strength of his hands. Liranzo doesn’t have great feel for the barrel, which is typical for a young a switch-hitter, let alone one of atypical size. His 65% contact rate is below the threshold of any 2023 big league first baseman… so there’s substantial Quad-A risk here if Liranzo can’t catch.

As for Sweeney, he was drafted by the Yankees out of Eastern Illinois University in 2021, as the 20th overall pick, then dealt to the Dodgers in a roster crunch-driven trade that sent Jorbit Vivas and Victor González to New York. At Triple-A Oklahoma City, the 6-foot-3, 212-pound Sweeney has hit .255/.334/.427 with 13 homers and 16 steals; via Statcast, he’s produced a 90.6 mph average exit velocity with a 7.7% barrel rate and a 44.3% hard-hit rate, with so many balls on the ground (46% rate) that it all translates to just a .356 xSLG. Sweeney’s best tool is his 55-grade raw power, but his other tools grade out as 40s, with a potential 45 for his game power and 50 for his hit tool. In updated notes he provided me on Tuesday, here’s what Longenhagen wrote:

Sweeney looks fine at short. The Dodgers position him such that he barely ever has to make a play to his backhand, and he’s constantly moving from right to left toward first base when he throws, which he seems most comfortable with. He looks like a suitable fit at shortstop despite his size. On offense, Sweeney’s bat path causes his in-game power to play down. His front side is high through contact and he tends to cut down at the baseball. He’s going to produce game power beneath his raw barring some kind of swing change. That will limit his ceiling and likely prevent Sweeney from being considered a true everyday option at short, but he should be a second-division regular or good utility guy.

For a deadline short on impact moves, the Dodgers made what arguably stands as the biggest one, at least from a pitching standpoint. Healthy and effective, Flaherty is a massive upgrade on Paxton, and he might be the Dodgers’ second-best starter behind Glasnow heading into October unless Kershaw or Yamamoto can summon their pre-injury form. To get him, the team parted with two players who likely have major league futures, including one of the few Top-100 prospects traded this month in Liranzo. But the Dodgers’ system is particularly deep at catcher, with 50-FV prospect Dalton Rushing at Double-A Tulsa and 45-FV prospect Diego Cartaya at Oklahoma City, and neither of them is going to supplant Will Smith anytime soon. The Dodgers will hardly miss these guys, particularly if it all pays off with a championship.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JohnnyRingoFWC
2 years ago

Bobby Miller for Nico H would have been a strong move for both teams in my view.

Flaherty is killing it, however, and deserves a shot at the postseason.

They got the impact guy they were wanting.

SenorGato
2 years ago
Reply to  JohnnyRingoFWC

“ Bobby Miller for Nico H would have been a strong move for both teams in my view.”

While I prefer like the fall of all states and freeing of the people, getting rid of money and private property, the world pointing and laughing at the humiliated losers and suckers who worship and swear fealty to money, getting rid of weapons, the world pointing and laughing at the arrogant and violent west collapsing, the people coming together to end imperialist engineered hunger and poverty etc etc…this is way up there on things I would love to see

casey jMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

Ha ha ha. Thanks for the laugh, Buddy. Your heart is big. A few others here care too, but we are only human… we just want to enjoy our precious, beloved, baseball.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Seems like a fair deal. If Liranzo can stick at catcher he is going to have a great bat for the position. He hasn’t been dominant like he was last year but he still is very young. Would have preferred Rushing but probably so did the Dodgers. The Dodgers get a guy who can pitch in the playoff rotation. In a deadline with some truly confounding trades, this one makes sense.

casey jMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Which one did you find the most confounding?

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  casey j

Kikuchi, Jimenez, Frankie Montas

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think the return was light based on limited availability of impact starters. Flaherty has been a solid #2 this year. I would’ve been happier with Rushing sounds like he’s more likely to stick at catcher. I’ve read Harris was asking too much and ran out of time (again) to work out anything better.

The Duke
2 years ago

Rosenthal has the Yankees backing out of Flaherty deal due to medicals so this will be interesting going forward

steveo
2 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

This makes more sense. With the returns some pitchers have been getting, this seemed kind of light. And now we know why.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  steveo

Dodgers certainly seem to have a type, that’s for sure

marchandman34Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  steveo

J

marchandman34Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  marchandman34

Typo, makes sense steveo

darren
2 years ago
Reply to  steveo

I don’t get how it’s light. It’s 2 months of a good starter and they are getting back a prospect who some have ranked in the top 100 plus another guy. That seems fine, doesn’t it? Kikuchi brought back more but that was considered a great haul for the Blue Jays, right?

EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

And with some skepticism on Jake Bloss in the Kikuchi deal (relief risk, and his fastball is meh). To be fair, Liranzo also has some skepticism that he’ll stick as a catcher and the Quad-A risk if he can’t.

I think it’s a little light because Flaherty is like… twice the pitcher Kikuchi has been this year? Kikuchi underperforms constantly, while Flaherty looks like a guy you could easily plug in as a #2 in the postseason this year. But if Flaherty has injury flags in his medicals, it makes sense that the return was lighter.

Last edited 2 years ago by EonADS
Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

Although, you can’t really compare one pitcher who got a return well above his market value with the rest of the pitchers in the market.

mikejuntMember
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

I saw a discussion yesterday that I agreed with which is that one of the things that seems to happen in commentary the last couple years is that we’re sort of perpetually amazed by how expensive pitching is, both in offseason and trade deadline, and that the default cost of a pitcher is ‘wow more than i expected’, because pitching just costs more than it seems like it should

In that context something that seems fine is actually on the light side.

I think this is a little bit of a perception thing, because pitchers are so frequently and easily injured that its really easy to see the downside of any pitching transaction and basically no pitcher gets the ‘well, he’s really durable, at least’ anymore.

casey jMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Great point. The fact that pitchers get injured doesn’t make them less valuable, it makes them MORE… especially if you are trying to maximize your last 2 (or 3) months of a baseball season.

The GuruMember since 2026
2 years ago

FG is only list that has lizano in top 100.

scottski45
2 years ago
Reply to  The Guru

I believe Keith Law had him at 99 going into the Season.

Sammy Sooser
2 years ago
Reply to  scottski45

And Baseball Prospectus had him ranked 70th

synco
2 years ago

Not to rain on the Dodgers’ parade, but guys like this (dudes have long periods of injury/ineffectiveness who come back and crush it in the first half) make me really nervous. Regression to the mean can be a painful thing.

The GuruMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Well if that happens its ok because they gave up no one for him. They have no prospect capital invested here.

puddleMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Not really a lot to suggest regression is in store. All his peripherals seem to indicate the changes are real and not just luck-based.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

With flaherty/edman, i’m not worried about regression as much as i am availability

darren
2 years ago

My main takeaway from this deadline is that teams’ rankings of prospects are far more varied than I realized previously. Before reading this piece, I saw several comments elsewhere about how the Dodgers didn’t give up nearly enough. But after reading this, it seems … fine?

The package the White Sox got for Fedde seems really light, but surely they received interest from several teams and liked these players better than what else was out there.

EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

It seems pretty likely to me that the White Sox overvalued the Dodgers prospects by comparing them to their own farm system, and looked at the things Vargas does well (plate discipline, better-than-average K rate, strong arm and straight-line speed) without seeing the obvious flags in his profile (lack of any power, contact issues, low agility, injury prone), as well as his former prospect ranking as a 50 FV. We’ll see, but the broad consensus seems to be that White Sox GM Chris Getz botched that trade hard.

Last edited 2 years ago by EonADS
darren
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

If it was a matter of comparing them to their own system, wouldn’t other teams’ prospects also looked better than their own?

casey jMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

Right. Also, Fedde is a career 4.92 ERA/4.87 FIP guy, who is 31 years old. Maybe going to one of the best farm systems to maximize his value ain’t bad? Chicago shares its spring training site with LA as well, so they know these dudes. We shall see how it goes!

norcalblueMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  casey j

Excellent points

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  casey j

You can’t look at career stats for a guy who comes back as a much better player after going to play overseas.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lanidrac
EonADSMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  darren

Not necessarily or to the same extent. Vargas may have been the icing for them, but he’s not that good. The White Sox have a weird habit of prioritizing corner guys and thinking they can move them up the defensive spectrum. Sure, he was a SS as a young prospect, but he looks nothing like that anymore. The two youngsters are clear 40 FVs without high ceilings at present, just hopeful signs that they can maybe overperform. Looks like a bulk return without actual bulk.

Also, Jerry Reinsdorf-run teams have a habit of going for talent that has one or two standout abilities but holes in the rest of their games, along with post-hype prospects, in trades. The Chicago Bulls teardown this offseason is a prime example. Alex Caruso for Josh Giddey straight up, or Chris Duarte as the primary return for star DeMar Derozan, both of which got panned for getting no or minimal draft compensation. Vargas fits that exact mold, with the lack of long-term upside prospects being equivalent to the lack of NBA draft compensation.

I really don’t think there were lesser offers for Fedde, just not ones that had a current MLB player as part of the return. And given that Vargas looks like a player with minimal upside as well, it’s just bad all around. I don’t expect him to stick at the MLB level, and neither do most experts. That he’s the best part of a return for one of the more desirable available pitchers is a bad sign. They also included two depth pieces in Pham and Kopech, and then covered Fedde’s entire remaining salary for the Cardinals.

“Fedde is a career 4.92 ERA/4.87 FIP guy” misses the point that he was the KBO MVP last year and has been pitching like a borderline All-Star with underlying stats that back it up this season, with easily verifiable changes in his approach and individual pitches. He’s not the guy he was in Washington, and it’s pretty obvious.

Last edited 2 years ago by EonADS
casey jMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

You don’t have any idea what the other offers were

And Vargas didn’t even play SS in the minor leagues. Nobody thinks he can do that.

Fedde is about as good as Dean Kremer, and the stats back that up. Both are good, useful pitchers but nothing to get excited about. I think he’s having a year like the one Miles Mikolas had (or Kremer), a few years ago.

Vargas has been a .300/ .400/ .500 up the ladder and is 24. He’s a good get.

Last edited 2 years ago by casey j
Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  casey j

Mikolas is a 2-time All-Star and has had a few good to excellent years before he started to decline last year. If Fedde is in the same mold, that is something to be excited about.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lanidrac
Shalesh
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

Vargas looks like a player with minimal upside as well, it’s just bad all around. I don’t expect him to stick at the MLB level, and neither do most experts.”

Longenhagen still forecasts him to be a 2-win player going forward: “Vargas is light on explosion and athleticism, which showed during his rookie year, but his barrel feel and feel for the zone should still make him a 2-WAR player over time.”

That’s an FV50 by definition. Now, he “only” has 5.5 years of control which would be a year short of actual FV50’s, but that’s splitting hairs. Of all the prospects traded at this year’s deadline, I’d only rather have Agustin Ramirez and maybe Thayron Liranzo. Thus, I don’t have a big problem with Vargas as the headliner.

The bigger problem with Fedde is guys like him in the past with 1.5 years of control returned an FV50 and an FV45, notably Marcus Stroman moving from the Blue Jays to the Mets for Simeon Woods Richardson and Anthony Kay back in 2019. And the Blue Jays didn’t need to cover Stroman’s salary. That the White Sox didn’t get an additional FV45 like Trey Sweeney from the Flaherty deal irks me. That would be a minimally fair deal, though I think I would be slightly disappointed only getting Flaherty’s package for Fedde since Fedde has a year more of control.

The White Sox probably didn’t want Liranzo because they have Edgar Quero at AAA and because Liranzo needs dev. Focusing on positions rather than on BPA (overall prospect rank) and on major-league readiness is short-sighted for a team that desperately needs trade value in the worst way, but I think that’s why Chris Getz is getting hammered.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  EonADS

The White Sox didn’t cover Fedde’s salary, only a little bit of it. The Cardinals are still paying Fedde’s salary next year and probably also part of his remaining salary this year. The Cardinals just offset it by no longer paying Edman’s salary.

surfdoc37
2 years ago

The Tigers got undressed in this one. Sweeney was basically given away by the Yankees due to a roster crunch over the winter. Liranzo is a catcher struggling to hit .220 in A ball and a long way away. And no pitching comes back. Seems like Harris got stuck with no plan B when the Yankees backed out. Usually you’d think if there was concern about injury risk, there would be a PTBNL based upon Flaherty staying off the DL and pitching into the playoffs.

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  surfdoc37

That’s not how the Sweeney trade went down. The Yankees sent away one player on the 40 and got two back. He was a good prospect at the time, though not rated quite as highly now.

SenorGato
2 years ago

I’ve always liked Sweeney, but what happened to his approach this year? More GBs and fewer FBs

casey jMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

I blame Kamala Harris