FanGraphs Power Rankings: Playoffs Edition
After a wild Sunday afternoon that held plenty of drama for the final day of the regular season, the postseason field is set. Team Entropy ultimately found no joy, with the remaining playoff spots finally decided without the need for tiebreaker games. With the Wild Card round set to begin on Tuesday, here’s a look at the 10 teams in the playoffs and how they stack up against each other.
A quick refresher: my approach takes the three most important components of a team — their offense (wRC+), and their starting rotation and bullpen (50%/50% FIP- and RA9-) — and combines them to create an overall team quality metric. Since regular season records don’t matter in the playoffs, I’ve ranked the teams simply by their overall team quality, removing the factors for win percentage and expected win percentage.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodgers | 106-56 | 113 | 76 | 88 | 183 | 16.5% |
| Giants | 107-55 | 114 | 84 | 86 | 183 | 8.7% |
The Dodgers and Giants spent the entire season battling each other for the NL West crown. Los Angeles won 50 games after the All-Star break to post the best record in the second half and only gained a single game on San Francisco. The closest the Dodgers were to overtaking the Giants was entering their series in San Francisco on September 3. Even though the division wasn’t actually decided until the final weekend, that series gave the Giants the edge they needed to secure their first division title since 2012. It’s a shame they’re lined up to face each other in a Division Series instead of the NLCS — should the Dodgers advance out of the Wild Card game, that is.
Injuries to key contributors might be all that holds these two teams back from making a deep postseason run. The Giants lost Brandon Belt to a fractured thumb last week. San Francisco had managed to get by without Belt for long stretches this season — he spent time on the injured list twice — but the loss of his bat is a significant blow to their lineup.
The Dodgers’ injury woes are a bit more concerning. Clayton Kershaw was pulled early from his final regular season start on Friday with elbow discomfort. He seems likely to miss the postseason, and since he’s set to hit free agency this winter, his future with the Dodgers is up in the air. If that wasn’t enough, on Sunday, Max Muncy exited early with an arm injury; he’s unlikely to play in the Wild Card game or the Division Series should they advance.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Sox | 93-69 | 110 | 84 | 90 | 171 | 14.6% |
| Rays | 100-62 | 110 | 95 | 86 | 160 | 7.1% |
The Rays won a franchise record 100 games this year, were the first team in the American League to clinch a postseason spot, and had the top seed locked up with a week left to play. The part of their roster that holds them back from a higher spot in these rankings is their starting rotation. With Tyler Glasnow lost for the season, their rotation lacks a proven, standout ace like they’ve had in years past. But their winning formula doesn’t necessarily require a strong rotation to work. They rely on their bullpen more than any other team in the majors, and their relievers collectively led baseball in WAR and FIP and were third in ERA. That formula worked phenomenally well last year and it will likely prove to be successful again.
The team with the best starting rotation in the American League sits right above them in these rankings. With the emergence of Dylan Cease and revitalization of Carlos Rodón, the White Sox have four elite starters to call on in October. Rodón’s health is the only question mark they’re facing, which is something of a surprise after the host of unfortunate injuries they suffered to key players in their lineup earlier this season. Their offense is healthy and firing on all cylinders and their bullpen is nearly as fearsome as the Rays’.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yankees | 92-70 | 102 | 90 | 88 | 151 | 7.6% |
| Astros | 95-67 | 117 | 89 | 101 | 147 | 15.3% |
| Red Sox | 92-70 | 107 | 95 | 96 | 141 | 8.0% |
| Braves | 88-73 | 104 | 93 | 94 | 140 | 9.7% |
| Brewers | 95-67 | 97 | 77 | 99 | 125 | 11.3% |
The Astros reign of dominance in the AL West continued this season with their fourth division title in the last five seasons. If it seems like they’re the forgotten team in the AL field, it’s likely because their success has become so ingrained as to be almost assumed. Of course they won their division; of course they have the best offense in baseball; of course they have an excellent starting rotation. The only thing that’s out of place this year is their average bullpen, and that’s the one thing that could keep them from advancing deep into the playoffs again.
Despite a solid grade in these rankings, both the Yankees and Red Sox had to claw their way into the playoffs. At least Boston ended the season on a high note, sweeping the Nationals to secure the top Wild Card spot. New York looked like they were going out strong after sweeping the Red Sox in Boston and winning a series against the Blue Jays. But they were outscored 16-6 in their final series against the Rays and only the first walk-off hit of Aaron Judge’s career saved them from a tiebreaker scenario with Toronto. In the past week, the Yankees have lost Luke Voit and DJ LeMahieu to injuries, but managed to align their rotation so that Gerrit Cole will get the start in the Wild Card game.
The Brewers seem like they’re criminally underrated by these rankings, but they enter the playoffs with the lowest team wRC+ in the 10-team field. Of course, they also possess the best rotation in baseball, which helps balance that weakness out somewhat. But if they fail to score enough runs, there’s only so much their pitching can do to carry the team. They found that out the hard way against the Cardinals in September, when those two teams played 10 times; Milwaukee scored just 33 runs in those games, losing seven of them. Because they had their division and playoff seeding locked up so early, they could afford to take their foot off the gas towards the end of the season while other teams were still fighting to make it into the party. But they’ll need to prove that they can hit the accelerator right off the bat against the Braves in the Division Series.
The Braves overcame a devastating injury to their best player, Ronald Acuña Jr., to win the NL East for the fourth season in a row. Their rebuild outfield of Jorge Soler, Eddie Rosario, and Adam Duvall combined to form an excellent trio, while Freddie Freeman, Ozzie Albies, and Austin Riley each had a phenomenal second half of the season. None of the individual components of their roster stands out in this field, but each of them is solidly above average. If they advance, it will be because the sum of their parts proves to be better than the high and low extremes of the Brewers.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardinals | 90-72 | 103 | 104 | 95 | 115 | 1.3% |
On September 1, the Cardinals were four games over .500 and three games back in the Wild Card race. They went 5-5 during their first 10 games, losing half a game in the standings. Then they won their next 17 and blasted their way into the second NL Wild Card spot. Just the fact that they made it to the postseason at all should be considered a triumph. St. Louis was written off after hanging around .500 for nearly the entire summer, but they put together a September to remember and now find themselves facing the Dodgers in a one-game playoff to advance to the Divisional round. Of course, their regular-season finish doesn’t necessarily guarantee continued success in the playoffs.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | World Series Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodgers | 106-56 | 113 | 76 | 88 | 183 | 16.5% |
| Giants | 107-55 | 114 | 84 | 86 | 183 | 8.7% |
| White Sox | 93-69 | 110 | 84 | 90 | 171 | 14.6% |
| Rays | 100-62 | 110 | 95 | 86 | 160 | 7.1% |
| Yankees | 92-70 | 102 | 90 | 88 | 151 | 7.6% |
| Astros | 95-67 | 117 | 89 | 101 | 147 | 15.3% |
| Red Sox | 92-70 | 107 | 95 | 96 | 141 | 8.0% |
| Braves | 88-73 | 104 | 93 | 94 | 140 | 9.7% |
| Brewers | 95-67 | 97 | 77 | 99 | 125 | 11.3% |
| Cardinals | 90-72 | 103 | 104 | 95 | 115 | 1.3% |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
For the life of me I cannot understand the Dodgers high odds. They are a bad start or an unlucky hitting night from elimination.
Completely agree. At best, they have a 35% chance to eliminated after 1 game. They also have Kershaw out, and Muncy is miss time. It’s insane that Fangraphs still has them as the favorites.
There’s no cardinals devil magic parameter in the model, that’s for sure
LAD has a .565 win % vs teams over .500. STL is playing the best baseball of their season.
They then have to play the Giants
So 16% is a 1/6 chance. Absolutely not. Maybe 16% or even 20% if they make it behind the WC, but at best it makes sense to put them at 60% for WC.
As they say in the Squid Game… “ELIMINATED!”
This is power rankings, not postseason predictions. The odds are based on strength of team, not factoring in that they have a one game WC game to get in.
Right now, in the wild-card game Fangraphs is giving the Dodgers a 72% chance of winning. That’s much, much too high in a sport where every team wins at least a third of their games and loses at least a third of their games. When you’re playing a team as good as the Cardinals are (and they are good) your chances of winning a single game against them should probably hit a ceiling at about 60%.
I have had this gripe with Fangraphs’ single-game prediction model for a long, long time. I know that the Dodgers have a very talented team but if a wild-card team has the best chance of winning the world series in the model it means some input into your model is flawed (or the model itself is broken).
Ben looked at postseason odds last week and found that Fan Graphs is right on in the percentages there. Maybe something similar needs to happen with single game odds? 72% feels high, but maybe it’s not?
The dodgers are currently -225 in vegas which implies 69% counting the vig, so maybe 67% is the real money prediction.
And FG currently shows them as 64% not 72, did something change or am i missing something?
Maybe it’s different on two different pages but on the LA Dodgers page on FG it says it’s at 72%.
Ben’s article looked at how well the odds work in-season, not during the playoffs. So I’m not sure how relevant it is to this discussion.
Duh, which is why I said it would be cool to see the same kind of look at single game odds.
The thing is, over a longer series forecasts get more accurate. In any one game, it’s harder to predict. I’m not convinced that the single-game odds are working correctly but it’s entirely possible that the same model predicts the playoff odds well.
Our single game odds are completely separate from our playoff model, but they rely on similar things. It will definitely change once the lineup is in. Our playoff odds currently have that game as 65/35.
I tend to agree that 72% sounds high. On the other hand, they went 14-5 (73.7%) against winning teams at home not named the Giants.
(I’m leaving the Giants out of this since I don’t want one team to have an undue influence on the results).
FG’s odds have the Dodgers as:
63.8% over STL
65.7% over SFG
66.1% over ATL/MIL
60.3% over the AL rep
Multiply that all up and you get 16.7% to repeat the title. Those are all MASSIVE advantages. Most of the other potential matchups are closer to 50/50, unless STL makes a run. The Cards would be significant dogs in every series they make it to.
At the very least, there’s no way the Dodgers should have that big of an advantage over the Giants!
Thanks for the analysis. Interesting that the Dodgers still have so much higher odds to win the WS than the Giants even though your quality measure says the two teams are equal and the Dodgers have to survive the Wild Card game. I guess it’s because the odds rely on a different measure of team quality that thinks the Dodgers are far better than the Giants. Btw, there’s a typo – the tables for Tiers 2, 3, & 4 say “Playoff Odds” where they should say “World Series Odds.”
Rays have by far the best record in the AL but the lowest WS odds.
Yeah, I can’t understand why the Red Sox and Yankees have better World Series odds when they have to play a one game playoff, and then will probably be underdogs against the Rays. Somethings missing.
I think the model probably overvalues SP a little and maybe undervalues RP a little. Those valuations might be accurate for the regular season, but less accurate for the post season when relievers are called upon to pitch more innings, but the bad relievers hardly need to pitch at all because of the extra off days.
The White Sox roster is going to be much more traditionally constructed, even if Rodon can’t go, and the model probably likes that.
Small typo. The charts for Tier 2, 3, and 4 say Playoff odds rather than WS odds.
Thanks. Fixed.
Maybe I’m missing something here but I’m not sure I understand how the team quality metric works. For example, the White Sox and Rays have the same wRC+, the Rays have a fairly significant advantage in starting pitching (+11) and the White Sox have a smaller advantage in relief pitching (+4) yet overall, the White Sox have a team quality score 11 points higher than the Rays. I’m sure everything is weighted differently but you would think the Rays would come out ahead here, not behind by a sizeable margin.
The pitching metrics shown are an average of FIP- and RA9-.
Lower numbers are therefore better (i.e., indicate allowing fewer runs than league average).
Doesn’t sound like there’s a strength of schedule adjustment, which I assume could matter in comparing teams from different divisions.
I could be wrong, but something seems off here. As a friend pointed out just now, how do the Rays have a lower WS% then either the Yankees or the Red Sox, who are worse teams and have to play a one-off WC game, to boot?
Dodgers’ odds should not be nearly so high, having to play the WC game is such a huge blow— even a 60% chance of winning that game is rough, and if they do win, then they have to go to SF for what would be a very fierce NLDS.
CHW-HOU should be a super fun matchup. I don’t think the fully healthy Chicago offense is much, if any, less potent than Houston’s, but Houston’s less-vaunted rotation is not far behind CHW’s, particularly with Rodon dealing with fatigue and much reduced velo— he’s not the lights-out firebreather from earlier this season. The bullpens might be the decider— both have elite closers (Pressly & Hendriks), but the quality of set-up guys (Kimbrel/Bummer vs Graveman/Garcia?) favors Chicago, and the lesser half of each bullpen, if called upon, strongly favors Chicago. Houston will probably need its starters to go fairly deep in games… which is rare in the playoffs in this era.
Also, I think Tampa is much underrated by this FG power ranking measure, because their “bullpen” throws so many more innings than any other. They’re not unbeatable, I don’t think, but I’d be surprised if they don’t make it to the ALCS and play very hard for the pennant. I do think the winner of the CHW/HOU matchup will be representing the AL in the World Series, though, more of a gut feeling than anything else.
I think the team quality is the driving factor in WS odds, not factoring in the likelihood of making it out of a WC game.
The Yankees with Gerret Cole starting game 4, should not frighten anyone.
I’m not sure how these odds are generated, but something doesn’t seem right. Along with all of the Dodgers vs. Giants comments, how can the Rays have a lower WS% than either the Yankees OR the Red Sox? Not only do the Rays have a higher “Team Quality”, but the Rays have home field advantage in the ALDS AND the Yankees and Red Sox play each other. Also, it is staggering to see that the Yankees, with all of their firepower, have the second worst offense of this group.
All I am going to do is what i have done since we got our first TV in 1949. Sit in a comfortable chair with a beverage, adult now, and enjoy the games. I don’t give a rat’s ass about what some computer analysis tries to predict. My deep doubts about the efficacy of these numbers is only increased, substantially at that, by the projections in this article. Adam Wainwright as a 28-72% underdog! Never before has this happened, I am certain, and is so absurd as to answer all the questions I have about the value of analytics. When a projection system shows me that it is capable of predicting that a team, the Giants, will exceed its 100% projection, and by a very wide margin, or highly touted teams can fall flat on their faces then I will believe in them. I wonder how many simulations had the Giants finishing 28 games ahead of the Padres. There are far too many outliers in every attempt to quantify every aspect of this intricate game to find anything that competent executives don’t see and understand. Unfortunately too many teams employ the Jeff Bridich’s of the world instead of Farhan Zaidi and Chaim Bloom. In this very enjoyable Red Sox season, the contributions of dumpster find Hunter Renfroe, Rule 5 steal Garrett Whitlock and, well above all others. the consistently brilliant performance of Enrique Hernandez indicates clearly that Bloom can see value where others cannot. All I see from analysis is reinforcement of easily seen information. Rafael Devers is a great hitter. Wow, that certainly needed a computer to tell the baseball world. His fielding is not as spectacular but the Red Sox are in the playoffs and where are the A’s with every sabermetricians favorite Matt Chapman whiffing over 200 times. Did the analysts miss that Chapman can’t hit? They both have the same BWar this year but you couldn’t give me 5 Chapman’s for 1 Devers. Let the games begin!!!!!
You know it’s not illegal to use the “enter” button on your keyboard, right?
This is the first time in the many recent Cardinals playoff runs that I’m not too concerned whether they win or lose. I can’t get too worked up about the outcome of one game, and the Dodgers are a significantly better team. It was fun to watch their September onslaught, and that’ll be what sticks with me for the foreseeable future.
As a general baseball fan, there is an incredible assortment of baseball talent on all of the playoff teams; it should be a strong showcase for MLB.
Simple math. Basically the Dodgers are the ‘overwhelming’ favorites to win the WS but the odds are ‘only’ 16% because they have to play in a WC game. Dodgers are the favorite against every team in the AL, and the overwhelming favorite in the NLCS. They are probably the favorite in a best of 5 against the Giants as well.
Probably factors in that their top 3 starters are far superior to everyone else. Their relievers are also better/equal to everyone else. That is probably why they have better odds than the Giants, otherwise it makes no sense.
Sucks to admit it, as I hate the Doyers. I would love nothing more than the Yankees and Dodgers being eliminated in the WC games.
Only their top 2 starters now that Kershaw is out.
Dodgers’ top 3 starters are Scherzer-Buehler-Urias, all likely to be in NL Cy Young top 5.
Wait until you hear about the Brewer’s starting pitchers…
Rays seem even tougher in a short series where their pen can throw maybe 2/3 of the total innings. Their lineup is at least as good as everyone else’s. I can see the pen getting tired as the postseason wears on but the first series should be the Rays at their best.
Are those odds aware that the Giants won 107 games? With great hitting, pitching and defense? I was surprised too, but at some point you have to give some credit.
I’m struggling here. The Rays have been far and away the best team in the AL this year (and really the last few years) while the White Sox are arguably the weakest team in the field, yet Chicago has double the World Series odds?
Yeah, this particular model seems to be undervaluing them and overvaluing BOS and NYY for whatever reason. No particular replies as to why that is, as of yet.
The Rays in general tend to get undervalued, and to a degree I understand why. They do everything differently, so I’m sure the projection systems don’t know exactly what to do with them. But for for a 100 win team to have half the odds of a 93 win Chicago team with a very poor record against >.500 teams and lower odds than the 2 teams playing in a 1 game playoff simply doesn’t make sense
I believe it’s because this model overemphasizes starting pitching
Yes, the Rays one is baffling to me. how both the Red Sox and Yankees can be favored to win the WS over them makes no sense to me, even if you take out the whole WC game factor (which is huge!). Even taking that out, the Rays have the higher “team quality” rating (debatable as that might be), so…? Anyways it would be cool to get some sort of answer on that
I don’t understand why the Dodgers’ postseason starters are supposed to be significantly better than the Giants’. The 4 Dodgers’ starters’ xFIPs are 2.89, 3.57, 3.73, and 4.63 (Scherzer/Buehler/Urias/Gonsolin); the 4 Giants’ starters’ are 2.79, 3.28, 3.44, and 3.95 (Webb/Gausman/Wood/DeSclafani). Same for xFIP- (68/84/88/109 vs. 65/77/81/93). Looks to me like the Giants’ starters are if anything better.
Can we get a reply as to what causes this model to assign a higher WS win probability to BOS and NYY despite being lower in “team quality” and having to play a coin-flip elimination game to boot?