FanGraphs Power Rankings: Playoffs Edition

After a wild Sunday afternoon that held plenty of drama for the final day of the regular season, the postseason field is set. Team Entropy ultimately found no joy, with the remaining playoff spots finally decided without the need for tiebreaker games. With the Wild Card round set to begin on Tuesday, here’s a look at the 10 teams in the playoffs and how they stack up against each other.

A quick refresher: my approach takes the three most important components of a team — their offense (wRC+), and their starting rotation and bullpen (50%/50% FIP- and RA9-) — and combines them to create an overall team quality metric. Since regular season records don’t matter in the playoffs, I’ve ranked the teams simply by their overall team quality, removing the factors for win percentage and expected win percentage.

Tier 1 – The NL Favorites
Team Record wRC+ SP- RP- Team Quality World Series Odds
Dodgers 106-56 113 76 88 183 16.5%
Giants 107-55 114 84 86 183 8.7%

The Dodgers and Giants spent the entire season battling each other for the NL West crown. Los Angeles won 50 games after the All-Star break to post the best record in the second half and only gained a single game on San Francisco. The closest the Dodgers were to overtaking the Giants was entering their series in San Francisco on September 3. Even though the division wasn’t actually decided until the final weekend, that series gave the Giants the edge they needed to secure their first division title since 2012. It’s a shame they’re lined up to face each other in a Division Series instead of the NLCS — should the Dodgers advance out of the Wild Card game, that is.

Injuries to key contributors might be all that holds these two teams back from making a deep postseason run. The Giants lost Brandon Belt to a fractured thumb last week. San Francisco had managed to get by without Belt for long stretches this season — he spent time on the injured list twice — but the loss of his bat is a significant blow to their lineup.

The Dodgers’ injury woes are a bit more concerning. Clayton Kershaw was pulled early from his final regular season start on Friday with elbow discomfort. He seems likely to miss the postseason, and since he’s set to hit free agency this winter, his future with the Dodgers is up in the air. If that wasn’t enough, on Sunday, Max Muncy exited early with an arm injury; he’s unlikely to play in the Wild Card game or the Division Series should they advance.

Tier 2 – The AL Favorites
Team Record wRC+ SP- RP- Team Quality World Series Odds
White Sox 93-69 110 84 90 171 14.6%
Rays 100-62 110 95 86 160 7.1%

The Rays won a franchise record 100 games this year, were the first team in the American League to clinch a postseason spot, and had the top seed locked up with a week left to play. The part of their roster that holds them back from a higher spot in these rankings is their starting rotation. With Tyler Glasnow lost for the season, their rotation lacks a proven, standout ace like they’ve had in years past. But their winning formula doesn’t necessarily require a strong rotation to work. They rely on their bullpen more than any other team in the majors, and their relievers collectively led baseball in WAR and FIP and were third in ERA. That formula worked phenomenally well last year and it will likely prove to be successful again.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The team with the best starting rotation in the American League sits right above them in these rankings. With the emergence of Dylan Cease and revitalization of Carlos Rodón, the White Sox have four elite starters to call on in October. Rodón’s health is the only question mark they’re facing, which is something of a surprise after the host of unfortunate injuries they suffered to key players in their lineup earlier this season. Their offense is healthy and firing on all cylinders and their bullpen is nearly as fearsome as the Rays’.

Tier 3 – The Melee
Team Record wRC+ SP- RP- Team Quality World Series Odds
Yankees 92-70 102 90 88 151 7.6%
Astros 95-67 117 89 101 147 15.3%
Red Sox 92-70 107 95 96 141 8.0%
Braves 88-73 104 93 94 140 9.7%
Brewers 95-67 97 77 99 125 11.3%

The Astros reign of dominance in the AL West continued this season with their fourth division title in the last five seasons. If it seems like they’re the forgotten team in the AL field, it’s likely because their success has become so ingrained as to be almost assumed. Of course they won their division; of course they have the best offense in baseball; of course they have an excellent starting rotation. The only thing that’s out of place this year is their average bullpen, and that’s the one thing that could keep them from advancing deep into the playoffs again.

Despite a solid grade in these rankings, both the Yankees and Red Sox had to claw their way into the playoffs. At least Boston ended the season on a high note, sweeping the Nationals to secure the top Wild Card spot. New York looked like they were going out strong after sweeping the Red Sox in Boston and winning a series against the Blue Jays. But they were outscored 16-6 in their final series against the Rays and only the first walk-off hit of Aaron Judge’s career saved them from a tiebreaker scenario with Toronto. In the past week, the Yankees have lost Luke Voit and DJ LeMahieu to injuries, but managed to align their rotation so that Gerrit Cole will get the start in the Wild Card game.

The Brewers seem like they’re criminally underrated by these rankings, but they enter the playoffs with the lowest team wRC+ in the 10-team field. Of course, they also possess the best rotation in baseball, which helps balance that weakness out somewhat. But if they fail to score enough runs, there’s only so much their pitching can do to carry the team. They found that out the hard way against the Cardinals in September, when those two teams played 10 times; Milwaukee scored just 33 runs in those games, losing seven of them. Because they had their division and playoff seeding locked up so early, they could afford to take their foot off the gas towards the end of the season while other teams were still fighting to make it into the party. But they’ll need to prove that they can hit the accelerator right off the bat against the Braves in the Division Series.

The Braves overcame a devastating injury to their best player, Ronald Acuña Jr., to win the NL East for the fourth season in a row. Their rebuild outfield of Jorge Soler, Eddie Rosario, and Adam Duvall combined to form an excellent trio, while Freddie Freeman, Ozzie Albies, and Austin Riley each had a phenomenal second half of the season. None of the individual components of their roster stands out in this field, but each of them is solidly above average. If they advance, it will be because the sum of their parts proves to be better than the high and low extremes of the Brewers.

Tier 4 – The Underdog
Team Record wRC+ SP- RP- Team Quality World Series Odds
Cardinals 90-72 103 104 95 115 1.3%

On September 1, the Cardinals were four games over .500 and three games back in the Wild Card race. They went 5-5 during their first 10 games, losing half a game in the standings. Then they won their next 17 and blasted their way into the second NL Wild Card spot. Just the fact that they made it to the postseason at all should be considered a triumph. St. Louis was written off after hanging around .500 for nearly the entire summer, but they put together a September to remember and now find themselves facing the Dodgers in a one-game playoff to advance to the Divisional round. Of course, their regular-season finish doesn’t necessarily guarantee continued success in the playoffs.


Playoff Power Rankings
Team Record wRC+ SP- RP- Team Quality World Series Odds
Dodgers 106-56 113 76 88 183 16.5%
Giants 107-55 114 84 86 183 8.7%
White Sox 93-69 110 84 90 171 14.6%
Rays 100-62 110 95 86 160 7.1%
Yankees 92-70 102 90 88 151 7.6%
Astros 95-67 117 89 101 147 15.3%
Red Sox 92-70 107 95 96 141 8.0%
Braves 88-73 104 93 94 140 9.7%
Brewers 95-67 97 77 99 125 11.3%
Cardinals 90-72 103 104 95 115 1.3%





Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago

For the life of me I cannot understand the Dodgers high odds. They are a bad start or an unlucky hitting night from elimination.

Brian McMember since 2020
4 years ago

Completely agree. At best, they have a 35% chance to eliminated after 1 game. They also have Kershaw out, and Muncy is miss time. It’s insane that Fangraphs still has them as the favorites.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mc

There’s no cardinals devil magic parameter in the model, that’s for sure

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mc

LAD has a .565 win % vs teams over .500. STL is playing the best baseball of their season.

They then have to play the Giants

So 16% is a 1/6 chance. Absolutely not. Maybe 16% or even 20% if they make it behind the WC, but at best it makes sense to put them at 60% for WC.

rustydudeMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  Brian Mc

As they say in the Squid Game… “ELIMINATED!”

offffffspeedMember since 2025
4 years ago

This is power rankings, not postseason predictions. The odds are based on strength of team, not factoring in that they have a one game WC game to get in.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Right now, in the wild-card game Fangraphs is giving the Dodgers a 72% chance of winning. That’s much, much too high in a sport where every team wins at least a third of their games and loses at least a third of their games. When you’re playing a team as good as the Cardinals are (and they are good) your chances of winning a single game against them should probably hit a ceiling at about 60%.

I have had this gripe with Fangraphs’ single-game prediction model for a long, long time. I know that the Dodgers have a very talented team but if a wild-card team has the best chance of winning the world series in the model it means some input into your model is flawed (or the model itself is broken).

jtricheyMember since 2021
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Ben looked at postseason odds last week and found that Fan Graphs is right on in the percentages there. Maybe something similar needs to happen with single game odds? 72% feels high, but maybe it’s not?

Pwn Shop
4 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

The dodgers are currently -225 in vegas which implies 69% counting the vig, so maybe 67% is the real money prediction.

Pwn Shop
4 years ago
Reply to  Pwn Shop

And FG currently shows them as 64% not 72, did something change or am i missing something?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Pwn Shop

Maybe it’s different on two different pages but on the LA Dodgers page on FG it says it’s at 72%.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

Ben’s article looked at how well the odds work in-season, not during the playoffs. So I’m not sure how relevant it is to this discussion.

jtricheyMember since 2021
4 years ago

Duh, which is why I said it would be cool to see the same kind of look at single game odds.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  jtrichey

The thing is, over a longer series forecasts get more accurate. In any one game, it’s harder to predict. I’m not convinced that the single-game odds are working correctly but it’s entirely possible that the same model predicts the playoff odds well.

David AppelmanFanGraphs Staff
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Our single game odds are completely separate from our playoff model, but they rely on similar things. It will definitely change once the lineup is in. Our playoff odds currently have that game as 65/35.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I tend to agree that 72% sounds high. On the other hand, they went 14-5 (73.7%) against winning teams at home not named the Giants.

(I’m leaving the Giants out of this since I don’t want one team to have an undue influence on the results).

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
4 years ago

FG’s odds have the Dodgers as:

63.8% over STL
65.7% over SFG
66.1% over ATL/MIL
60.3% over the AL rep

Multiply that all up and you get 16.7% to repeat the title. Those are all MASSIVE advantages. Most of the other potential matchups are closer to 50/50, unless STL makes a run. The Cards would be significant dogs in every series they make it to.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

At the very least, there’s no way the Dodgers should have that big of an advantage over the Giants!

JamesD84
4 years ago

Thanks for the analysis. Interesting that the Dodgers still have so much higher odds to win the WS than the Giants even though your quality measure says the two teams are equal and the Dodgers have to survive the Wild Card game. I guess it’s because the odds rely on a different measure of team quality that thinks the Dodgers are far better than the Giants. Btw, there’s a typo – the tables for Tiers 2, 3, & 4 say “Playoff Odds” where they should say “World Series Odds.”

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  JamesD84

Rays have by far the best record in the AL but the lowest WS odds.

Brian McMember since 2020
4 years ago

Yeah, I can’t understand why the Red Sox and Yankees have better World Series odds when they have to play a one game playoff, and then will probably be underdogs against the Rays. Somethings missing.

MikeSMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  JamesD84

I think the model probably overvalues SP a little and maybe undervalues RP a little. Those valuations might be accurate for the regular season, but less accurate for the post season when relievers are called upon to pitch more innings, but the bad relievers hardly need to pitch at all because of the extra off days.

The White Sox roster is going to be much more traditionally constructed, even if Rodon can’t go, and the model probably likes that.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago

Small typo. The charts for Tier 2, 3, and 4 say Playoff odds rather than WS odds.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
4 years ago

Maybe I’m missing something here but I’m not sure I understand how the team quality metric works. For example, the White Sox and Rays have the same wRC+, the Rays have a fairly significant advantage in starting pitching (+11) and the White Sox have a smaller advantage in relief pitching (+4) yet overall, the White Sox have a team quality score 11 points higher than the Rays. I’m sure everything is weighted differently but you would think the Rays would come out ahead here, not behind by a sizeable margin.

Dave TMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

The pitching metrics shown are an average of FIP- and RA9-.

Lower numbers are therefore better (i.e., indicate allowing fewer runs than league average).

JamesD84
4 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Doesn’t sound like there’s a strength of schedule adjustment, which I assume could matter in comparing teams from different divisions.

weinventyou
4 years ago

I could be wrong, but something seems off here. As a friend pointed out just now, how do the Rays have a lower WS% then either the Yankees or the Red Sox, who are worse teams and have to play a one-off WC game, to boot?

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago

Dodgers’ odds should not be nearly so high, having to play the WC game is such a huge blow— even a 60% chance of winning that game is rough, and if they do win, then they have to go to SF for what would be a very fierce NLDS.

CHW-HOU should be a super fun matchup. I don’t think the fully healthy Chicago offense is much, if any, less potent than Houston’s, but Houston’s less-vaunted rotation is not far behind CHW’s, particularly with Rodon dealing with fatigue and much reduced velo— he’s not the lights-out firebreather from earlier this season. The bullpens might be the decider— both have elite closers (Pressly & Hendriks), but the quality of set-up guys (Kimbrel/Bummer vs Graveman/Garcia?) favors Chicago, and the lesser half of each bullpen, if called upon, strongly favors Chicago. Houston will probably need its starters to go fairly deep in games… which is rare in the playoffs in this era.

Also, I think Tampa is much underrated by this FG power ranking measure, because their “bullpen” throws so many more innings than any other. They’re not unbeatable, I don’t think, but I’d be surprised if they don’t make it to the ALCS and play very hard for the pennant. I do think the winner of the CHW/HOU matchup will be representing the AL in the World Series, though, more of a gut feeling than anything else.

offffffspeedMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  MRDXol

I think the team quality is the driving factor in WS odds, not factoring in the likelihood of making it out of a WC game.

shaq_diesel
4 years ago

The Yankees with Gerret Cole starting game 4, should not frighten anyone.

Christopher
4 years ago

I’m not sure how these odds are generated, but something doesn’t seem right. Along with all of the Dodgers vs. Giants comments, how can the Rays have a lower WS% than either the Yankees OR the Red Sox? Not only do the Rays have a higher “Team Quality”, but the Rays have home field advantage in the ALDS AND the Yankees and Red Sox play each other. Also, it is staggering to see that the Yankees, with all of their firepower, have the second worst offense of this group.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago

All I am going to do is what i have done since we got our first TV in 1949. Sit in a comfortable chair with a beverage, adult now, and enjoy the games. I don’t give a rat’s ass about what some computer analysis tries to predict. My deep doubts about the efficacy of these numbers is only increased, substantially at that, by the projections in this article. Adam Wainwright as a 28-72% underdog! Never before has this happened, I am certain, and is so absurd as to answer all the questions I have about the value of analytics. When a projection system shows me that it is capable of predicting that a team, the Giants, will exceed its 100% projection, and by a very wide margin, or highly touted teams can fall flat on their faces then I will believe in them. I wonder how many simulations had the Giants finishing 28 games ahead of the Padres. There are far too many outliers in every attempt to quantify every aspect of this intricate game to find anything that competent executives don’t see and understand. Unfortunately too many teams employ the Jeff Bridich’s of the world instead of Farhan Zaidi and Chaim Bloom. In this very enjoyable Red Sox season, the contributions of dumpster find Hunter Renfroe, Rule 5 steal Garrett Whitlock and, well above all others. the consistently brilliant performance of Enrique Hernandez indicates clearly that Bloom can see value where others cannot. All I see from analysis is reinforcement of easily seen information. Rafael Devers is a great hitter. Wow, that certainly needed a computer to tell the baseball world. His fielding is not as spectacular but the Red Sox are in the playoffs and where are the A’s with every sabermetricians favorite Matt Chapman whiffing over 200 times. Did the analysts miss that Chapman can’t hit? They both have the same BWar this year but you couldn’t give me 5 Chapman’s for 1 Devers. Let the games begin!!!!!

natedub
4 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

You know it’s not illegal to use the “enter” button on your keyboard, right?

tdouglas
4 years ago

This is the first time in the many recent Cardinals playoff runs that I’m not too concerned whether they win or lose. I can’t get too worked up about the outcome of one game, and the Dodgers are a significantly better team. It was fun to watch their September onslaught, and that’ll be what sticks with me for the foreseeable future.

As a general baseball fan, there is an incredible assortment of baseball talent on all of the playoff teams; it should be a strong showcase for MLB.

Xerostomia
4 years ago

Simple math. Basically the Dodgers are the ‘overwhelming’ favorites to win the WS but the odds are ‘only’ 16% because they have to play in a WC game. Dodgers are the favorite against every team in the AL, and the overwhelming favorite in the NLCS. They are probably the favorite in a best of 5 against the Giants as well.

Probably factors in that their top 3 starters are far superior to everyone else. Their relievers are also better/equal to everyone else. That is probably why they have better odds than the Giants, otherwise it makes no sense.

Sucks to admit it, as I hate the Doyers. I would love nothing more than the Yankees and Dodgers being eliminated in the WC games.

Lanidrac
4 years ago
Reply to  Xerostomia

Only their top 2 starters now that Kershaw is out.

tung_twista
4 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Dodgers’ top 3 starters are Scherzer-Buehler-Urias, all likely to be in NL Cy Young top 5.

Brian McMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Xerostomia

Wait until you hear about the Brewer’s starting pitchers…

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

Rays seem even tougher in a short series where their pen can throw maybe 2/3 of the total innings. Their lineup is at least as good as everyone else’s. I can see the pen getting tired as the postseason wears on but the first series should be the Rays at their best.

jsolid
4 years ago

Are those odds aware that the Giants won 107 games? With great hitting, pitching and defense? I was surprised too, but at some point you have to give some credit.

Dmjn53
4 years ago

I’m struggling here. The Rays have been far and away the best team in the AL this year (and really the last few years) while the White Sox are arguably the weakest team in the field, yet Chicago has double the World Series odds?

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Yeah, this particular model seems to be undervaluing them and overvaluing BOS and NYY for whatever reason. No particular replies as to why that is, as of yet.

Dmjn53
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

The Rays in general tend to get undervalued, and to a degree I understand why. They do everything differently, so I’m sure the projection systems don’t know exactly what to do with them. But for for a 100 win team to have half the odds of a 93 win Chicago team with a very poor record against >.500 teams and lower odds than the 2 teams playing in a 1 game playoff simply doesn’t make sense

leftycurve66
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

I believe it’s because this model overemphasizes starting pitching

weinventyou
4 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Yes, the Rays one is baffling to me. how both the Red Sox and Yankees can be favored to win the WS over them makes no sense to me, even if you take out the whole WC game factor (which is huge!). Even taking that out, the Rays have the higher “team quality” rating (debatable as that might be), so…? Anyways it would be cool to get some sort of answer on that

johnforthegiants
4 years ago

I don’t understand why the Dodgers’ postseason starters are supposed to be significantly better than the Giants’. The 4 Dodgers’ starters’ xFIPs are 2.89, 3.57, 3.73, and 4.63 (Scherzer/Buehler/Urias/Gonsolin); the 4 Giants’ starters’ are 2.79, 3.28, 3.44, and 3.95 (Webb/Gausman/Wood/DeSclafani). Same for xFIP- (68/84/88/109 vs. 65/77/81/93). Looks to me like the Giants’ starters are if anything better.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago

Can we get a reply as to what causes this model to assign a higher WS win probability to BOS and NYY despite being lower in “team quality” and having to play a coin-flip elimination game to boot?