Meet the Dodgers’ Right-Handed Skyrocket

The Dodgers have, and have had for a few years, one of the very best farm systems around. That leads to them receiving a certain amount of coverage, so you couldn’t in good conscience consider the Dodgers’ system in any way underrated. Yet so much attention has been focused on the elites — Corey Seager, Joc Pederson, Julio Urias, Cody Bellinger, and so forth. The major story of the system is the top of the system. Which, in turn, can undersell the best of the others.

We spent time last year singing the praises of Jharel Cotton, who has since been traded away. Cotton kind of got lost in the mix. Similarly, we’ve spent time singing the praises of Jose De Leon, who has also since been traded away. The De Leon perception suffered from the nearby presence of Urias. Maybe the fact that those two have been traded means the Dodgers weren’t big fans after all. Maybe it doesn’t mean that. But they’re major-league pitchers, and if the Dodgers just demonstrated anything, it’s that you can need a lot of those in a summer.

Why, then, deplete the depth? Well, Cotton got another starting pitcher. De Leon got a starting second baseman. Those are good reasons. Brock Stewart is another good reason. Fairly quietly, Stewart surged forward in 2016, by pulling off two very fundamental tasks: throwing a bunch of strikes, and missing a bunch of bats.

Stewart, to be clear, isn’t a no-one. The Dodgers gave him some major-league experience. Eric recently ranked him as their seventh-best prospect. Baseball America put him at eighth. Stewart has shown himself to be good, and prospect evaluators are aware of that, but he still isn’t seen as one of the elites, overall or within his own system. So Stewart’s, for now, isn’t a sexy name. But I can show you a sexy plot, if such a thing can exist. I can show you why Stewart is on my own radar.

I got some help from Matthew Carruth, who pulled numbers from high-level minor-leaguers for the past five years. In the plot below, combined Double-A and Triple-A numbers for starters with at least 1,000 pitches thrown in a given year. Shown are two familiar statistics: strike rate and contact rate. Stewart’s 2016 data point is highlighted in blue.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Very clearly, Stewart’s point is exceptional, well removed from the crowd. That point to Stewart’s right belongs to 2016 Cesar Valdez — he’s a 31-year-old changeup artist who spent years playing in Mexico. The A’s picked him up, and he’s interesting, but he comes with a small margin of error. The only other point close to Stewart has partial overlap, and that point belongs to 2016 Joe Musgrove, who the Astros don’t want to trade for Jose Quintana. Between the highest levels of the minors last year, Stewart allowed 75% contact while throwing 71% strikes. That is a silly combination.

I know that scouting types like to scoff at people who scout the stat line, so to speak. And, yeah, stat lines can easily mislead. They provide only some of the necessary information. At the same time, one shouldn’t understate the significance of simply getting the job done in the upper minors. That’s the best way to show you’re ready for a promotion. Last year, out of starters who threw at least 50 innings in Double-A, Stewart ranked fourth in K-BB%, behind major prospects Luke Weaver, David Paulino, and Josh Hader. And then last year, out of starters who threw at least 50 innings in Triple-A, Stewart ranked second in K-BB%, behind only Jose De Leon. In the lower minors, just having one good offspeed pitch can lead to outstanding results. In the upper minors, you need to be more polished, and Stewart did better than almost anyone.

And Stewart isn’t Cesar Valdez. Valdez forever needs his changeup to be on, because he’s defined by his finesse. Stewart’s fastball just averaged 93.2 miles per hour. Yu Darvish’s fastball just averaged 93.3 miles per hour. And by spin rate, Stewart’s four-seamer wound up in the 96th percentile, right by Blake Snell and Dylan Bundy. Stewart doesn’t try to survive by guile — he blends command and above-average arm strength. He has three pitches, and his changeup is ahead of his slider.

Yeah, in Stewart’s brief time in the majors, he allowed seven homers in 28 innings. That’s bad! Four of those came in one game in Colorado. And if you’re going to hold Stewart’s homers against him, you need to also give him credit for generating a better-than-average exit velocity. He was either easy to hit, or not. The small samples are in conflict with one another. I’ll note that over the same small sample, Stewart allowed the same big-league rate of contact as Chris Sale and Jake Arrieta. It wasn’t all lousy. It was even mostly fine, and Stewart’s 2016 was a whirlwind.

There’s one critical bit of information I haven’t mentioned yet. What could be one explanation for Stewart’s rapid rise? He was drafted in the sixth round in 2014. That was also his first year as a pitcher, and he mostly relieved for Illinois State. In 2015, he got in 19 starts. In 2016, he got in 26. This was just his second full year as a pitcher, and as a starting pitcher, and even going back to college, Stewart has just 312 innings of competitive baseball on his arm. In that sense, he’s 25, going on 20, and he’s still figuring things out. The fact that he already has command of a three-pitch big-league repertoire is remarkable.

Whenever we include .gifs, we’re always selective for ones that support the argument. So, yeah, this is a little bit of propaganda, but you should have an idea of how Stewart’s pitches look, visually. Here’s the fastball, which he can move around to either side of the plate:

Here’s the slider, which is sometimes like a cutter. Big-league hitters missed it half the time they swung.

And here’s the changeup, which Stewart is quite fond of, whether he’s facing a lefty or righty. The changeup in the majors was 12.2 ticks slower than the heater. That was the sixth-biggest gap out of 250 pitchers. Interestingly, four of the top six began last year as Dodgers property. Anyway! Look at a whiff.

It should go without saying that Stewart still has work to do. His slider could stand to add more depth, and in no game last year did Stewart exceed 95 pitches. He’s still building up arm strength, and he still has his own drawbacks. But there’s so much here, already, making Stewart far more interesting than the average 25-year-old. To have his stuff, and his command, after so little pitching is incredible, and the Dodgers have to be excited about what could be in store for 2017 ahead. You can’t really fake what Stewart just did, and Stewart just did something terrific. After all, the best indicator of success at the major-league level is great success just below it.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
mike sixelMember since 2016
9 years ago

He’s no Brian Dozier….

BipMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  mike sixel

The Twins agree.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
9 years ago

I know this is a ridiculous comparison, but boy does the action on that fastball remind me of Max Scherzer (minus several ticks of velocity, obviously).

CornDog9
9 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

Good catch. He’s got that kinda low release with good arm side run.

jrubyMember since 2016
9 years ago

So, what you’re saying is…

… Skyrocket’s in flight?

Beer
9 years ago
Reply to  jruby

Downvoted for the earworm.

seattlefan68Member since 2018
9 years ago

God bless you, Marauder.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

Does anyone else think that the often praised Dodgers depth is a little misleading? The do have a ton of average players (1.5 to 2.5 war projected) and that is worth a lot (some rebuilding teams only have like 2 to 3 average or better players) but in the end a lot of he production hinges on kershaw and seager.

Of course that is true for any team but if you compare them to the cubs, the cubs could compensate a loss of bryant or Lester better than the Dodgers could a loss of their two superstars.

Basically the Dodgers are a solid WC contender plus two superstars which of course equals to a very good team but to me they are not a juggernaut like the Cubs. That doesn’t mean they can’t win 100 games or even the WS, they certainly have the potential to do this if everything goes right but they are not a super team like the Cubs are IMO (which doesn’t mean they couldn’t beat them if the stars align right).

If we devide the players in superstars (5 plus war), very good players around 3 to 4 and average ish (1.5 to 2.5) you get by using projections:

Cubs
Super: Bryant, rizzo
Very good: Lester, arrieta, Russell, contreras, zobrist,Heyward, probably schwarber (zips has him lower but I think after is WS showings 3 war is not unrealistic), hendricks
Average : lackey,baez, almora, Davis, Montgomery

Dodgers:
Super: kershaw, seager
Very good: Peterson, turner, grandal, maybe maeda, hill (projects as average but I bump him to very good, maybe fair for docking puig)
Average ish: puig (projected for 3 but after last year he won’t get enough PAs plus he might not be as good anyway), gonzalez, Barnes, Forsythe, Thompson, segedin, toles, Urias, Kazmir, Jansen

So the Dodgers match the cubs in the superstar category and maybe even beat them in the average ish player category but they clearly lose out in the very good category (and two of them in hill and maeda have quite some risk too so it very well could be just 3 very good players).

The Dodgers are very good and could beat the cubs but still imo there is a pretty big gap between the stars and the rest, you got two superstars, 3 to 5 very good players (depending on the luck, but hill is a risk,turner had his physical problems too and and maeda must prove he is really a 3 win guy, even grandal has his risk ) and then a ton of average guys.

The cubs on the other hand have to relatively unrisky superstars,and about 8 guys who are relatively sure bets (compared to the Dodgers who have fewer and more risky guys) and then some average guys albeit a little fewer than the Dodgers.

Again it doesn’t matter how you get the wins and the Dodgers could win a lot but still a lot on the dodgers hinges on about 7 very good players of which at least 3 (hill, turner,grandal) have an elevated risk.

The Dodgers depth is good but only as long the key guys don’t get injured, especially in the middle infield they basically have no real mlb ready depth in their highly touted farm or the majors.

The cubs could easily replace even bryant (put in baez) or rizzo (put in schwarber) but the Dodgers could not replace grandal, turner, seager or kershaw at all). The cubs couldn’t really replace arrieta or Lester either but they would still have two very good starters left.

So the Dodgers are a good team but maybe not as good as they look on paper if they eveneed only have average injury luck.

snwbrdr3886
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

The Dodgers did lose Kershaw last year for about 2 1/2 months. And not only did the Dodgers not fade w/o Kershaw they caught the Giants and passed them w/o Kershaw. The Dodgers might not have as many “superstars” but they have depth. The depth is what got them through the months w/o Kershaw. Of course any team that loses the best pitcher on the planet won’t be better off, but the Dodgers have the depth, the money, and the farm system to compete with the Cubs. The Dodgers came within 2 wins of going to the WS and I hope the Dodgers meet the Cubs again in the playoffs.

I am the Rockies fan
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

The dodgers depth is real.

snwbrdr3886
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Dominik: Is the Dodgers depth a little overrated? Tons of average players but so much hinges on kershaw and seager. The depth in average players is good but if one of the big two gets hurt there is not much. On the other hand the cubs could replace one of their stars better (baez for bryant or schwarber for rizzo). It seems lIke the Dodgers match the cubs in superstars and even beat them in those average guys but the cubs have a lot more good players behind their superstars then the Dodgers have.

Jeff Zimmerman: What if Lester and Arrieta go down? Cubs have the same issues as the Dodgers.

Paul Swydan: There’s a couple of problems here. First, Seager is one of just four Dodgers projected to have a .345 wOBA or better. They have plenty of good hitters. Second, the fortunes of MOST teams come down to their best two players.

Paul Swydan: The Dodgers have 6 players forecasted for 3.0+ WAR. The Cubs have 7. So your claim that the Cubs have more stars is a bit off. Sorry you hate Joc Pederson and Justin Turner?

I see that Jeff and Paul answered your question in the chat today. They had a way better answer than i did.

bunslow
9 years ago

As a Cubs fan, that first GIF of the fastball is giving me some serious flashbacks to the Klubot in game 1 of the World Series