Michael King Has Assumed His Right Place as a Starting Pitcher

Where is the line that tells you whether a pitcher is a starter or reliever? It’s subjective, but there are a few benchmarks that baseball folks have used over time to determine a pitcher’s role. Do they have more than two pitches? Do they have extreme splits? Does their velocity hold as their pitch count increases? Depending on the answer to any of these questions (and more), you’ll have a decent idea of a pitcher’s fate as a starter or reliever.
Sometimes, though, pitchers get moved to the bullpen simply because the other five options at any given time seem more viable, and not necessarily because they didn’t possess the skills to dish out six quality innings. The latter firmly describes Michael King.
King was a starter throughout his entire minor league career and even started a few games during his debut season in 2020 before settling into a long relief role in 2021 thanks to a crowded Yankees rotation. But the version of King we saw in the minors and those two seasons is not what he is now. For that, we have to reference his 2022 season, when he fully embraced his ability to supinate and started throwing his sweeper as his only breaking ball, upping the usage to 30%; the year prior, he only threw it 10% of the time. Before suffering a season-ending elbow fracture, he posted a 2.29 ERA and 2.23 FIP in 51 innings, delivering several multi-inning outings out of the bullpen.
On top of his sinker and sweeper, King displayed his ability to mix in his four-seamer and changeup at the right times, both of which have been crucial to his success as a starter; more on that later. That gave him a four-pitch mix where each pitch was at least average and more than one that was plus. That’s the exact kind of arsenal you’d expect a rotation arm to have, but coming off elbow surgery and bullpen success and facing another full starting five, the expectation wasn’t that he’d get the chance to pitch in that role.
Luckily for him and the Yankees, King started the season looking close to his elite form in ‘22 despite coming off elbow surgery. The one regression he did see was a lost tick of velocity across the board, but perhaps that was best for his health and longevity. A cross-body delivery like his can be volatile if the body isn’t optimized for it; maybe dialing it down a tick allowed him to manage the wear and tear of a full season better. Either way, his repertoire was still effective, and he proved it in April, delivering several multi-inning relief outings in which he threw as many as 40 pitches and often between 25–35.
At the time, the Yankees were being careful with King, giving him at least three days (and usually more) in between appearances; rarely did he throw with only two days of rest until June. Then, as the Yankees’ starting rotation was put to the test at multiple points in the summer, King’s presence became more important. He began to have longer outings and planned long relief days in late July and early August. By the end of August, he was being stretched out into deeper pitch counts. It’s possible that decision came more out of need than want, but it was the perfect time to experiment, as the Yankees had fallen out of the wild card race.
Before King’s August 24 start, his season-high pitch count was 44. From every start after that one, his cap increased:
| Date | Rest Days | Pitch Count | Innings | Fastball Velocity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 24 | 3 | 50 | 2.2 | 95.4 |
| August 29 | 4 | 61 | 4.0 | 95.0 |
| September 3 | 4 | 69 | 5.0 | 94.4 |
| September 9 | 4 | 79 | 5.0 | 95.2 |
| September 14 | 4 | 87 | 4.2 | 94.6 |
| September 20 | 5 | 101 | 7.0 | 94.5 |
On the surface, this looks very positive. It’s only been a month, but King has held his velocity through each of the starts, even as he’s hit the century mark in pitch count. Aside from the performance, looking for signs of fatigue is crucial to assessing his viability as a starter long term, and as he continues to work at this level of volume, it’s good to see him keep up the velocity, especially since this is the most he has thrown in one season since 2018.
To zoom in a little bit more on his velocity trends, let’s look at his averages by inning as a starter:
| Inning | FB Velo | Total Fastballs |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95.7 | 69 |
| 2 | 94.7 | 52 |
| 3 | 94.9 | 73 |
| 4 | 94.2 | 43 |
| 5 | 94.1 | 33 |
| 6 | 93.9 | 7 |
| 7 | 94.0 | 9 |
Keep in mind that we’re working with small samples here, and that King has only worked past five innings once. Even with that, the dropoff wasn’t too bad in his dominant 13-strikeout performance against Toronto. He mitigated it by varying the velocity between his two fastballs and properly working in his sweeper and changeup. As you work deeper into games and lose a little bit of juice, it makes sense to switch up locations, vary pitch speeds even within a given pitch, and mix in different pitches. That’s the beauty of being a four-pitch guy with a knack for dotting corners with your heater: You provide hitters with different looks and can stay unpredictable even as they’ve already seen you multiple times.
That brings me to the next key factor in analyzing King’s transition to starting: the pitch mix change.
| Pitch | Starter | Reliever |
|---|---|---|
| Sinker | 41.4 | 30.1 |
| 4-seamer | 22.6 | 21.8 |
| Sweeper | 22.4 | 33.3 |
| Changeup | 13.6 | 14.7 |
Out of the bullpen, King often used his sweeper as his primary weapon, which made sense; he was only in for one trip through the order, and the pitch was often a good tool for getting ahead in the count or getting a whiff on the outer third, especially against right-handed batters. But that’s exactly it: the pitch is most effective in one specific part of the zone. He can’t manipulate the location as much as he can with his sinker. By relying more heavily on that sinker, he’s taken on the old school mantra of establishing his best fastball, then working off it. Although the pitch has negative run value as a starter, he needs it to keep hitters guessing locations and speeds. And while he does use his four-seamer quite frequently, don’t get it twisted: King is who he is because of his ability to command his sinker in every part of the zone.
That’s another reason why he was such a good candidate to start. Not many pitchers in baseball can command a Corey Kluber-esque frisbee sinker, but King is one of them, and that gives him a unique look relative to the rest of the league. Because of this, he can run sinkers over the back door to righties (and front door to lefties) better than any right-handed pitcher in baseball. Among all righties with 100 pitches on the glove-side third of the plate since the start of 2022, nobody has a higher called strike rate (74.8%) than King; the next highest is Brusdar Graterol at 67.9%. The cross-body movement paired with the pitch’s run makes it very difficult for hitters to identify it as a ball or strike. This unique trait is always at the forefront of hitter’s mind and forces them to wait a long time to make their swing decision.
You can see a perfect example of this in action in this at-bat against Bo Bichette from Wednesday night:
Pitch 1 (0-0, sinker)
Pitch 2 (0-1, sweeper)
Pitch 3 (1-1, four-seamer)
Pitch 4 (1-2, four-seamer)
Pitch 5 (1-2, sinker)
Bichette has elite feel for his barrel, and as a hitter who peppers the opposite field gap better than anybody in baseball, this should have been a good matchup for him. In theory, King’s arm-side run on the outer half might work perfectly for Bichette’s bat path, but execution like this makes that obsolete. King’s strength may be that pitch on the outer third, but he opted to run a sinker inside to start the at-bat. This is a prime example of knowing your hitter: bang him inside and force him to try to open to pull the ball. By following up with the sweeper, he tested whether Bichette would attempt to cheat for the inside heater and chase, and though Bichette held off, King got a good read on his approach.
The next swing is telling of how King’s execution on the previous two pitches kept Bichette guessing, as he got a center-cut four-seamer but was too late to get his barrel to it. The logical next step from King was to dial it up more to see if he could get a whiff, and that is exactly what he did.
Note that this pitch got up to 95.6 mph — three ticks harder than the sinker inside on the first pitch. This is something King has done very well in his move to the rotation. He wants the four-seamer to function as a firmer heater that can work up in the zone to make sure hitters don’t sit on the sink. Based on Bichette’s swing, that plan worked very well. After this, Bichette was forced to speed up; he hadn’t been on a single fastball all at-bat and needed to do something to make that happen, but he cheated too much on the inside sinker that was running inside and couldn’t hold up in time once he recognized it as a ball.
The thing is, these types of uncomfortable swings are the norm for King. He has the stuff and command to expose weaknesses in a variety of hitter types, even those that should be a bad theoretical matchup for him. To me, that’s what it means to be a starter.
King isn’t the type of guy who lights up a radar gun, but his stuff is wicked. If it helps put it into perspective, he is in the same territory of overall Stuff+ as Grayson Rodriguez and Dylan Cease. That’s good for 13th among all pitchers with at least 90 innings. It’s been clear for almost a year now that he has the stuff and command to warrant a starting rotation opportunity. He got his shot and didn’t look back; in 28.1 innings as a starter, he has a 0.72 FIP and 1.27 ERA. It’s safe to say his spot isn’t going anywhere.
Esteban is a contributing writer at FanGraphs. One of his main hobbies is taking dry hacks every time he sees a bat.
This has been one of the (very) few positives lately for the Yanks. He looked dominant through most of that start against the Jays. If the Yanks get two good seasons in 24 out of the Cortes/Rodon/King trio, the rotation will be in good shape.
They’ll need it; the lineup next year feels quite suspect.
The lineup next year is unknown.
Let me spoil the surprise for you then: it’s going to be mostly the same lineup. Judge, LeMahieu, Rizzo, Stanton, Volpe, and a likely Wells/Trevino tandem are locks. If Torres is traded, odds are that the lineup is worse off for it, not better.
They’ll fill holes in CF and LF somehow, but if I had to guess it’ll either be veteran types who aren’t difference-making hitters or something like revisiting the Dylan Carlson trade talks or a similar reclamation project on a disappointing young player with former prospect pedigree. I could see them selling themselves on thinking they could turn Alek Thomas into 70% of what a good Brett Gardner season looked like, and then have him worst-case scenario as a platoon bat defensive replacement 4th outfielder.
Point is, the position players who would substantially raise the production of this lineup aren’t out there to be signed as free agents, because they’re not signing Ohtani. So if you’re expecting a better lineup next year, it’s mostly going to have to be on the backs of better production from players already on the team, when a few of the most important players on the team started looking a lot older in a hurry in the past few years.
Hopefully he can remain healthy as a starter. I don’t buy the need for 3 pitches thing nor the platoon split. There are too many 5.00 ERA starters for anything to matter other than maybe staying power and even that can by managed by making the guy a bulk person
They need to extend him as soon as possible. I’ve seen enough. I’m not even joking when I say he’s better than Gerrit Cole on a rate basis. He’s got a deeper repertoire and induces weaker contact. If Michael King can make 30 starts next year he’s putting up 4 WAR in my opinion. He should be their #2 next year. Cole, King, Rodon, (Yamamoto), Cortes would be an amazing rotation with Schmidt, Vasquez, Brito, German, Warren, Fitts, Hampton, Thorpe as depth could be really good. And yes, I’m assuming the Yankees sign Yamamoto since it looks like they’ve shown extreme interest to the effect of a Tanaka, Cole, etc. I think they get their guy. Especially since there aren’t any bats worth a big contract. I guess Shohei is worth it, but that’s not happening.
Well you have to realize that the reason Cole got the contract that he did wasn’t just his rate stats, it’s the durability. I love watching King and I think he’s clearly capable of being a great starter, but it’s very, very hard to feel comfortable giving a guy the kind of extension you’d give a top-tier starter when he’s never thrown a starter’s innings load in a season and just had a fractured elbow last year.
I’d give him like 5/40ish or something with an option. Not gonna give him anything crazy.
Maybe he’ll take it. Or maybe they’ll just do what they always do and go year to year, esp with the risk that he gets hurt and then they don’t owe him money.
I’m fairly certain German will never throw another pitch for the Yankees. They’re done with him. He had a second chance and blew it.
He went to rehab for an alcohol addiction. How is that blowing his second chance? They’ll let him get the help he needs, then re-evaluate him from a baseball perspective. I mean he’s an average starter, a decent 4th/5th starter to have laying around. Those don’t grow on trees.
Could be an amazing rotation. Or not. There’s a huge range of outcomes for guys like King, Rodon, and Cortes. And I wouldn’t be so confident about them signing Yamamoto. At a minimum, they’ll probably have to outbid the Mets. And there are other teams that will take their best shot as well.
I don’t think the Mets will be heavy bidders. I think they’re going into a transition year next year and look to see what their prospects can do. Also I don’t think the Yankees will be outbid. When they want a player, they don’t get outbid. That rang true before the Cohen Mets though so not entirely sure if that’ll still be the case.
Y. Yamamoto is actually the perfect Mets signing, given where they are. He’s young enough to be great now, and still in his prime in 5 years. In Senga they’ve got a terrific postseason starter, as well. Quintana has postseason stuff. The Mets can decide to contend in 2024, if they want. Yamamoto, two MOR starters (or go a little better on one of the two), a good setup man given the age of Ottavino and Raley, and fill out the bullpen. Get over the dream that Peterson and Megill will discover durability at 28 and recognize them as solid MIRPs, 3-inning guys but no more than that.
They have an average offense with upside, with room for a serious older DH on a short deal if the don’t want to gamble on one or both of Baty or Vientos. A solid LFer (say Canha v. 2022-23) on a short deal would be another obvious addition. In short, the problems are obvious, and the holes aren’t particularly difficult to fill. Even dealing half a dozen key players and playing Locastro and Ortega their Pyth record is 76-80. Team OPS+ even with quitting at the Deadline is 98; team ERA+ is 98. Nor do they have to touch prospect capital if they don’t want to, given their needs. Stearns has plenty of work to do but it’s straightforward work. Cohen would be foolish to feel so burnt after 2023 that he backs off for a year or two.
(Fwiw, Mauricio at 3B makes sense so as not to waste McNeil’s iffy bat in LF, but Baty and Vientos aren’t remotely ready and clearly can’t handle 3B or the OF. Try one of both at DH if you must!)
I’m intrigued by King as a starter as I thought he had starter potential in the minors, although there was concern if he had enough velocity. Injuries and team need put him in the bullpen, during which time his fastball increased a few clicks. The fact he’s been able to hold that velocity as a starter moves him from back-end rotation material to potentially more front end.
I’m not sure I get your Cole comparison because “rate basis” is very much impacted by volume of starts and innings. We don’t know if he can hold that at all. This is a small sample size. King has a total of 237 career innings over five seasons in the majors as a pitcher. Cole, meanwhile, will pitch 200 innings in a single season.
I do agree they should look at an extension, as long as it’s reasonable. There’s risk that the higher workload will lead to injury, but the risk of not seeing if King can be a top starter outweighs keeping him as a reliever. He can always go back to being a reliever, but the only way to know if he’s a top starter is to let him start. Structure the contract accordingly.
Worth noting that King came up in yesterday’s chat with Dan:
Q: What are the chances Michael King follows Jeffrey Springs’ career path – long time reliever stretched out into very solid starter?
A: I think there’s a real chance. But I think it depends how much injury risk the Yankees feel like. He hasn’t had TJ, but he’s had a couple significant elbow injuries. And I keep getting images of Tony Saunders.
I think the Yankees will probably take the risk. But even Springs is a cautionary tale – his time as a “very sold starter” didn’t last very long before TJ hit.
Dave Dravecky was another gruesome one
It’s worth taking the risk. He’s been a very good reliever, but the potential as a starter has to be examined at this stage.
Crazy that in this day and age a starter who throws 95 isn’t considered someone who lights up the radar gun.
It’s worth noting that he’s added a couple ticks to his fastball, since his prospect days – he came up throwing like 92.
A lot of it is better radar guns. The guys throwing 95 these days would have been at 92 or 93 on the guns of 25 years ago.
Splendid analysis, though anyone who can regularly repeat the break on Pitch 5 is likely to be dominant.