Now Tommy Pham Is a Pirate, Yarrrgh

Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports

Tommy Pham is on the move again. The well-traveled outfielder reportedly agreed to a one-year, $4.025 million deal with the Pirates on Thursday, meaning that he’ll join his ninth team over the past five seasons and the 10th of his 12-year career. Past experience suggests he should probably rent instead of buy.

Pham, who will turn 37 on March 8, spent time with three different teams in 2024. Despite a very solid 2023 showing — .256/.328/.446 (109 wRC+) with 16 homers, 22 steals, and 1.9 WAR — with the Mets and Diamondbacks, he went unsigned through spring training before finally inking a deal with the White Sox in mid-April. He escaped their record-setting futility when he was traded back to the Cardinals (who originally drafted him in 2006) as part of the three-way swap that sent Michael Kopech and Tommy Edman to the Dodgers, and then was plucked off of waivers by the Royals on August 31. At least he’s gotten back-to-back trips to the postseason thanks to all that moving around.

Whether it was because he missed spring training, never stayed in one place for long, or was increasingly subject to the ravages of aging — spending time around those White Sox and Cardinals teams could take years off a man’s life — Pham did not play well in 2024. He hit just .248/.305/.368, setting career lows in on-base percentage and walk rate (7.3%) as well as a full-season low in slugging percentage. (He slugged .312 in 125 plate appearances during the pandemic-shortened 2020 season.) He was basically replacement level in 2024, and his 91 wRC+ fit into the weird pattern he’s shown over the past half-decade, with above-average seasons in odd-numbered years and below-average seasons in even-numbered ones. Maybe that bodes well for the Buccos.

Pham’s numbers contain many unsettling signs. He’s a very disciplined hitter, chasing just 18.2% of pitches outside the zone, the sixth-lowest rate from among the 207 hitters with at least 400 plate appearances; his 40.5% swing rate was 11th lowest. Yet pitchers were unafraid to challenge him in the zone; he ranked ninth with 54.8% of pitches there. He didn’t do a ton of damage with them: His .423 slugging percentage on in-zone pitches was 43 points below the major league average, and his .298 wOBA on such pitches was 19 points below average. His overall quality of contact fell off notably from 2023 to ’24:

Tommy Pham Statcast Profile
Season BBE EV LA Barrel% HardHit% AVG xBA SLG xSLG wOBA xwOBA
2021 351 90.8 7.6 10.0% 46.7% .229 .253 .383 .438 .318 .350
2022 392 92.2 7.7 7.9% 48.2% .236 .238 .374 .383 .304 .311
2023 326 92.3 5.7 10.7% 48.8% .256 .284 .446 .475 .332 .361
2024 335 90.4 11.1 7.2% 42.7% .248 .263 .368 .407 .297 .319

Throughout his career, Pham has made hard contact consistently, with numbers that have almost invariably placed in the 85th percentile or higher. The 2024 season marked a departure from that, as his exit velocity dropped by nearly two miles per hour. It still placed in the 70th percentile, but that was down from two straight seasons in the 93rd percentile. Similarly, his career-low hard-hit rate marked a drop from the 89th percentile to 64th, and his career-low barrel rate from the 69th to the 43rd. His xSLG was his second-lowest mark, and he even fell short of that by 39 points. As his double-digit average launch angle suggests, he got under too many pitches; his 23.6% under rate represented a career high and a 7.3-point jump from 2023.

If Pham’s 2024 performance looks like an aberration in that light, his breakdown by pitch groups suggests a more alarming pattern. Normally, I’m not a huge fan of Statcast’s aggregations because they tend to paper over some nuances, but woof, over the past four seasons, Pham has been weak against anything that’s not a fastball of some type:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
Tommy Pham vs. Pitch Groups 2021–24
Season Pitch Type % PA AVG xBA SLG xSLG wOBA xwOBA Whiff
2021 Fastball 61.4% 390 .265 .281 .426 .492 .362 .393 16.5%
2022 Fastball 57.1% 363 .281 .284 .431 .460 .355 .368 17.3%
2023 Fastball 52.3% 271 .283 .327 .489 .555 .367 .419 14.8%
2024 Fastball 55.9% 274 .297 .304 .447 .482 .355 .372 17.6%
2021 Breaking 30.4% 158 .130 .175 .229 .288 .239 .278 35.7%
2022 Breaking 32.4% 189 .155 .163 .293 .275 .227 .230 38.6%
2023 Breaking 33.2% 136 .254 .247 .459 .430 .336 .325 30.4%
2024 Breaking 33.5% 149 .206 .219 .277 .317 .233 .256 28.2%
2021 Offspeed 8.2% 46 .186 .187 .395 .325 .271 .251 34.5%
2022 Offspeed 10.5% 74 .235 .212 .309 .299 .264 .251 34.8%
2023 Offspeed 14.5% 77 .167 .202 .278 .287 .212 .231 41.1%
2024 Offspeed 10.6% 55 .132 .197 .245 .298 .179 .229 31.1%
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

Aside from his 2023 showing against breaking balls, Pham has posted wOBAs and xwOBAs of .280 or lower against breaking and offspeed stuff annually for the last four seasons. Put another way, only twice has he slugged higher than .309 against a non-fastball pitch group during that span (breaking balls in 2023 and offspeed stuff in ’21). Circling back to an observation I made above, when pitchers got ahead of him and then landed breaking balls or offspeed pitches in the zone, Pham managed just a .249 wOBA, 28 points below the league average, and for the 2021–24 period he was 22 points below average (.251 vs. .273).

On the other side of the ball, Pham’s defensive metrics were not good either, as he set a career worst with -10 DRS and was also below average in terms of FRV (-5) and UZR (-2.6). But here I’m inclined to cut him considerable slack. After playing just 136 innings in center field from 2021–23, he spent 223 innings there for the White Sox, mostly from late April to early June when Luis Robert Jr. was sidelined by injury; that accounts for -7 DRS and -2 FRV. He was bad in right (-4 DRS, -4 FRV) as well, but those 387 2/3 innings were spread over three teams and adjacent to seven different center fielders. Even while he’s been average to below average during his nomadic years, it’s difficult look good under those circumstances.

Pham figures to be in some kind of right field job share with the Pirates, who non-tendered Bryan De La Cruz and Connor Joe in November. Bryan Reynolds is slated to start in left with Oneil Cruz set for his first full season in center after shifting from shortstop late last year. Pham’s platoon splits have been just about dead even in the past two seasons. (He was particularly effective against lefties with the White Sox but slumped mightily against them in his subsequent stops.) The candidates to share time with him in Pittsburgh are all lefties, namely Joshua Palacios, Jack Suwinski, and Adam Frazier. None of them performed well in 2024; Palacios’ 93 wRC+ came in just 78 plate appearances while each of the other two posted a low-60s wRC+ in just shy of 300 PA.

Pham is coming off a rough season with some disconcerting trends, but that’s exactly why he’s here, making a modest salary for a team that projects to be competitive but a bit below .500. Maybe it all comes together for the Pirates with a full season of Paul Skenes, Jared Jones, and Mitch Keller atop their rotation. If it doesn’t, you can bet that some GM will be ready to take a flyer on Pham in late July or August.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
CC AFCMember since 2016
1 year ago

See? Here’s the nothing that Kansas City could have tried to replace Melendez!

Slacker GeorgeMember since 2016
1 year ago

Cherington continues his confounding moves. He’s half-assed either going all in on FAs or letting the kids play. All this does is block “prospects” that the team desperately needs to get a read on for 2026 and beyond. Pick a lane, Ben!

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Slacker George

the actual bad thing about this is that there ISNT a prospect that Pham is blocking.

thats the saddest part of all of this. the rebuild hasnt gone well. its yielded almost no hitting.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

Nick Yorke is the guy most of us wanted to see moved to OF and then there is Davis who needs to play somewhere as more AAA time isnt going to help.

eph1970Member since 2020
1 year ago

Seems plausible. Most infielders can learn to be decent outfielders fairly quickly. Unfortunately, even though he’s likely to hit, Yorke has very limited experience in RF and doesn’t profile very well there. His range and arm are underwhelming.

Well Davis could work, on a two-strike approach, continue to improve improve game calling, and work on playing FB.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

The Dodgers have 45 OFs they don’t know what to do with and spent the offseason accumulating arms. Seems like KC could have had Pages or Outman; LA probably would eat a lot of Taylor’s contract and he looked like a solid player in the 2nd half.

Even if you don’t buy these moves, there *were* moves to be made. Glad to see FG rightly excoriate KC and PIT this week for wasting their stars’ primes.

BuccoFanMember since 2017
1 year ago

For an extra $1 million, the Bucs could’ve had an actual useful player, like Randall Grichuk or Austin Hays. If only they operated like a legitimate major league ball club. What a shame.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  BuccoFan

The fact that Austin Hays got that little amount of money is still surprising to me. He was not healthy last year at all.

It’s not clear to me why he picked the Reds over the Pirates but it might be that they promised him a larger role. If Hays thought he was going to get platooned with Suwinski then you can see how he would choose the Reds.

Plus the Reds park is very hitter friendly, a decent place for him to try to have a better walk year.

Bottom line, I think the Pirates would have had to offer far more to get Hays. Grichuk probably didn’t have any other options though.

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Depends what you mean by “far more”.

Percentage wise, yes, it would have been far more, but, I’ll bet he’d have gone to Pittsburgh for $2-3M more..which is small potatoes for a guy who is more likely to be a positive contributor..unless you view it as 40-60% MORE!!!!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

If they had to double it, they should have done it.

If they had to triple it, then they probably shouldn’t.

I think it’s entirely possible doubling it wouldn’t have been enough.

Jay BookmanMember since 2020
1 year ago

Maybe the Bucs wanted Tommy because he’s such a great clubhouse guy?
No?

jmb2171Member since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bookman

They tried that approach with Tellez last year and we know how that worked out.

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bookman

How’s the Fantasy Football league set up?

Of course, odds are he’ll be on another team before the draft is even scheduled.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

We can only hope for a quick DFA, they walked away form a younger, cheaper, better player in Joe for this?!

jsdspudMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  Jay Bookman

He does deserve some credit for punching Joc Pederson over fantasy football or something. Maybe with Pham on the roster Pederson will circle the bases a little faster when he hits home runs against the Pirates this year.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

Pham actually popped a +1 drs in LF last year. smaller sample than the other positions.

Regardless, i think we can say he’s a better corner outfielder than bryan reynolds at this point. Reynolds doesnt seem to be able to handle PNC Park’s cavernous LF anymore. “who plays which corner” isnt a super important issue, but Reynolds to RF and Pham to LF is just my guess of what ends up happening.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

The main interesting thing about pham is that he did just pop that .360 xwoba in 2023. I mean heck, even having a woba in 2025 that matches his 2024 xwoba would be welcome for the pirates.

Theres two main creeds i’ve noticed with who this front office has been acquiring. 1) they really really really really dont want to end up with a multi year deal that ages poorly. and 2) they seem obsessed with low strikeout rates, beyond anything else.

Frazier, IKF, Pham, McCutchen, Horwitz are all recent acquisitions with very low K rates. Hayes, Gonzales, Reynolds are all relatively low K guys. Cruz and Bart are the only guys who i’d call higher K guys in that lineup.

say what you want about the 2025 pirates, but i dont think they’ll strike out that much. “Yay”

Also, fun fact, they now have the THIRD OLDEST LINEUP IN MLB, by roster resource lineups.

Last edited 1 year ago by JayGray007
JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

If i’m the pirates, i’m still hunting for one more useful bat.

I dont think it’s wise to project Cutch for more than 5 days a week anymore, and i’m not entirely sure we should pencil Pham in for much more.

i think there’d be a good situation here for Verdugo to play 4x a week vs RHP’s, and for Cutch and Pham to each sit 2x a week to create the Verdugo spot.

Pirates need to add any cheap average-ish hitter they can, imo. If they arent bringing in a difference maker (they arent), then maybe at least have as many AB taken by non-terrible hitters as possible.

but alas, i dont control the pirates, and the pirates dont really care about winning, so.

Last edited 1 year ago by JayGray007
jsdspudMember since 2018
1 year ago

Nothing against Pham because I don’t know much about him. This signing couldn’t have generated less excitement for me. Adding a 37 year old to a team that finished in last place just doesn’t move the needle for me. Why not let Palacios or Cook run with the job?

I think it is time to ask the question how Ben Cherington keeps his job. I believe in 9 years as a GM his teams have finished in last place 7 times, fourth place once, and somehow won a world series in the remaining year.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  jsdspud

I went down this road on another thread and got shouted down by the obvious “its Nutting’s fault”. I don’t think they are mutually exclusive, BC can choose to spend $4M better than this. Last year he spent $30M on Chapman and a bag of nothing vets like this. If the plan is to build, then play the kids; if it is to content then sign/trade for real contributing players like the Horowitz deal.

jmb2171Member since 2018
1 year ago

Being charitable to Cherington, the way I look at is that he may be an average GM but given Nutting’s spending constraints, the Pirates need a very good GM and he isn’t that. Teams have won with Nutting’s payrolls but their GMs are considered among the best in the business.

Nothing wrong with being average, but the combination of Cherington and Nutting has doomed us Pirates fans.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  jmb2171

this is 100 percent my view and i am really happy to see someone else have it.

The pirates need the cutting edge. They need elite decision making.

Ben is C+ at best. which is good enough in some places! not in pittsburgh.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  jsdspud

one of the few ways i can think of to defend it (i have no real interest in defending them) is depth. lets just say they think Palacios, Pham, and Cook area all average-ish hitters. it’s better to have three of those in your org than just 2. idk!

One more injury now has to happen before Bae is depended on.

HomesteadSteveMember since 2018
1 year ago

Excellent headline Jay, well done.

F*CK YOU BOB NUTTING YOU POS

Faithfully Submitted,
Lifelong Pirates Fan

ScoreboardMember since 2016🏆 MVP
1 year ago

Just here to say 10/10 on article title

snakestl
1 year ago

One time I went to a Kane County Cougars game against the Quad Cities River Bandits in 2008 and the Bandits’ lineup featured three future Cardinal Legends: Thomas Pham, Adron Chambers and Pete Kozma.

Youppi!
1 year ago

“Past experience suggests he should probably rent instead of buy.”

Ha. Well played.