2017 Trade Value: #31 to #40

Welcome to the third installment of this year’s Trade Value series; you can see the links to the honorable mentions and the last 10 guys in the list in the toolbar above. If you’re not familiar with this project, there’s an explanation of the process in the HM post, so that’s the best place to start.
As a reminder for those who don’t like clicking links, however, the five-year WAR projections are based on Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS forecasts, though the players aren’t ranked based on those projections; these figures are included merely as a piece of information to help round out the picture. The guaranteed-dollars line measures the amount of money the player is owed outside of team options or arbitration years; for most of these guys, team options are very likely to be exercised, and many of them will end up making more than the guaranteed-dollars number reports.
No need to delay any further; let’s look at the 10 guys who made today’s cut.
| Team Control WAR Total | +17.7 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2021 |
| Previous Rank | #31 |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 24 | +4.2 | Arb1 |
| 2019 | 25 | +4.6 | Arb2 |
| 2020 | 26 | +4.5 | Arb3 |
| 2021 | 27 | +4.5 | Arb4 |
If this was just Dave’s Top 50 Franchise Players or something, Russell might not be on this list. I’ve maintained some skepticism over the years about his eventual offensive upside, given his moderate power and low contact rates. His poor start to 2017 isn’t helping the idea that the bat is headed in the right direction. But feedback from friends in the game suggested that his stock within MLB is still pretty high, with multiple reminders that this is a guy who put up +7 WAR at ages 21-22, and he doesn’t need to crush the ball to be an elite player given his defense.


