Nelson Cruz Wasn’t Out by a Mile

The Dominican Republic hadn’t lost a game in the World Baseball Classic since 2009. They’ve been a juggernaut, an unstoppable force barreling through immovable objects. That ended last night when Puerto Rico beat them 3-1 in a game that was much wilder than its score would indicate. One of the more dazzling plays was Javier Baez putting a no-look tag on Nelson Cruz on an ill-advised steal attempt.

When we say ill-advised, we really mean it. For one, Yadier Molina was behind the plate, and Yadi has been of the best in the business at throwing out baserunners. Cruz can only really be called a baserunner because of the fact that he does, in fact, technically run between the bases, even if “lumbering” may be a better verb for this scenario. Cruz is a large, 36-year-old adult human being. He hasn’t recorded a positive baserunning figure since 2010. Whatever speed he once possessed (24 steals in Triple-A in 2008!) is almost entirely gone.

There’s also the factor of Baez, who has revealed to the surprise of many that tagging is a real skill. So, yeah, we’re not sure why Cruz was running here, especially with two outs and an 0-0 count on Adrian Beltre. But run he did, and well, this happened.

Baez didn’t even look at Cruz. He was pointing to Molina and grinning like a kid on Christmas before he even caught the ball. You silly, silly man, he’s probably thinking to himself. Thanks for the free out. Cruz is out by a mile, and Peurto Rico gallops off to the dugout. Goddamn, Javy Baez. Goddamn, Yadi. Jeez, Nelson Cruz.

But hold on a second, here. Slow-motion video affords us the chance to take a closer look at plays like this. It also affords us the chance to make complete and utter fools of ourselves, as I may be about to do here. But I’ve been writing here long enough for all of you to get used to that by now, so hang with me here for a second. Let’s roll the film again.

Molina’s throw beats Cruz to Baez. The ball is in Javy’s glove right as Cruz is starting to slide. Nine times out of ten that’s game over, man. But was it? It initially looked like Baez got the tag down on Cruz’s knee, and Cruz was dead on arrival at second base.

This isn’t an episode of CSI, so I can’t tell the lab tech to enhance the video and clean up the pixels. I can, however, tell you that the umpire was on the shortstop side of second base, and that his view of Baez’s glove was obstructed by Cruz’s legs and tookus. And here’s a warning, because this is about to turn into a bad knock-off episode of CSI.

Read the rest of this entry »


Dave Cameron FanGraphs Chat – 3/15/17

12:01
Dave Cameron: Happy Wednesday, everyone.

12:02
Dave Cameron: Plenty to talk about this week; the wildly entertaining WBC, Eric’s Top 100 and the updated prospect valuations we rolled out, new Statcast data, every Rockie getting hurt…

12:02
Dave Cameron: So let’s chat for an hour or so.

12:02
The Average Sports Fan: Do you agree with Moncada as the #1 overall prospect?

12:04
Dave Cameron: I think it depends on what you’re emphasizing. It seems pretty likely that he has the highest upside of any prospect in this class, and if you think he’s going to hit for a lot of power or get the strikeouts under control, he’s a franchise player. Of course, given that Benintendi is more likely to produce value in the short-term and seems to have a lower risk profile, it’s perfectly reasonable to take a bit less upside in order to get a higher probability of some value.

12:04
Dave Cameron: For the Red Sox, keeping Benintendi was probably the right call, since he’s more likely to help them this year. If I’m the White Sox, and I’m looking way down the road, I probably do prefer Moncada.

Read the rest of this entry »


The Power of Pitch “Lineage”

PORT CHARLOTTE, Fla. – When we think about Tampa Bay Rays pitching over the last decade, the image of opposing hitters flailing helplessly over the top of changeups — offerings with velocity separation and depth — is likely one of the first to come to mind. That’s what comes to my mind. I think about hitters whiffing at Rays’ changeups, even on occasions when they’ve anticipated the pitch. I think about pitchers who have possessed pedestrian velocity and breaking stuff, who may not might have otherwise had much of a major-league career without the pitch. I think about a pitcher like James Shields, a founding father of the Rays’ changeup philosophy and track record.

Since 2010, the Rays lead baseball in runs produced above average by means of the changeup, according to FanGraphs pitch-type linear weight (174.8). The next closest club is the Mariners with a mark of 108.0. The Rays lead baseball in changeup usage (14.7%) since 2010, as well.

When I traveled to Rays camp last week to write about the Rays’ high-fastball philosophy, I also wanted to ask longtime Rays pitching coach Jim Hickey about the club’s changeup philosophy. My assumption was that Rays coaches teach the pitch well, that it’s part of an organizational philosophy. And while Hickey and the Rays value the pitch, he said philosophy alone doesn’t explain the club’s success with the pitch from pitchers like Shields and David Price, to Alex Cobb and now Jake Odorizzi.

“It’s not so much a philosophy as it is a lineage,” Hickey said.

Hickey said what explains the club’s success with the pitch isn’t so much a product of organizational philosophy, or coaching, as it is the result of pitchers with effective changeup grips passing along their craft to teammates.

“James Shields was arguably the best pitcher I had at the time [when Hickey arrived in 2006], and what Shields had was a really, really good changeup. And without the changeup he’s probably a major-league pitcher, but he’s not a 10-year, 225-innings-a-year guy,” Hickey said. “And here comes a guy like Jeremy Hellickson, who, without his changeup, is a pretty good minor-league pitcher. What happens is guys start to mimic each other. When David Price came in, he didn’t even possess a changeup. He threw a four-seam fastball and a slider. He’s watching Shields do his thing. He’s learning a changeup. He comes back with a pretty good changeup. Just like with Cobb and Odorizzi. They kind of mimic each other and teach each other.”

And for that reason, perhaps clubs should place a premium on pitchers who possess elite pitches and are able to share and articulate their grips and practices.

Pitchers also know each other’s stories. Shields credited the changeup with saving his career, according Joe Smith to of the Tampa Bay Times:

When he “lost” his curveball in the minors, he lived off his changeup, a pitch he said can be easier to throw for a strike than a breaking ball. In one minor-league game, Shields remembers 65 of his 85 pitches were changeups. “At that point I was on the brink of release,” he said. “I was trying to do anything to be successful.”

Eno Sarris has documented the changeup grips of Cobb and Odorizzi, and it was to Cobb where Odorizzi turned when looking to add another pitch. He had struggled with more conventional changeup grips in the past. Cobb has an unusual split-changeup grip. As AL East batters know well, the pitch has excellent depth and movement.

“I could just never take enough off a changeup,” Odorizzi said. “The grips never allowed me to have that separation. So I go and try [Cobb’s grip] through a normal arm speed, and it was more about movement than speed differential. Sometimes it’s 5-6 mph differential… I need the movement.”

Owen Watson wrote about the evolution of Price’s changeup last offseason.

The Rays have handed down elite changeup grips and philosophy from one rotation arm to the next. While there was a dip in the club’s effectiveness with the pitch the last two seasons — in part because of Cobb’s injury — Rays’ pitchers have generally become more effective with the pitch since Shields arrived at the major-league level. Even after the departure of an arm like Shields, the changeup forebear who was traded after the 2012 season, the Rays have continued to changeup well:

Now, of course, Rays coaches and officials certainly encourage use of the pitch. They’ve identified pitchers with plus changeups to acquire like Jose De Leon.

“I’ve always been a huge advocate of changeups,” Hickey said. “I like changeups because it’s the easiest pitch to throw in the strike zone [amongst] non-fastballs. If you have a nasty curveball, that’s great. But if it gets to a 3-1 count, and the bases are loaded, and you don’t want to walk that guy in, you are probably not snapping off a hook. Hellickson is a great example. I remember one time it was bases loaded, it was 3-1, and he threw three consecutive changeups and struck the guy out. That’s why I like it.”

Here’s another example of Hellickson throwing a full-count changeup with the bases loaded back in 2012:

“When I personally became a huge advocate of the changeup is when the strike zone shrunk. I really think the strike zone shrunk after Camden Yards opened, and the PED era, and everybody is hitting 50 home runs,” Hickey said. “We used to joke you had to throw it in a damn shoebox. You couldn’t do that with a lot of offspeed stuff. You don’t see a lot of fastball-curveball starters. It was fastball-changeup-slider starters.”

And while the strike zone grew every year from 2008 to -15 according to PITCHf/x data, it shrunk last season.

“Another reason I’m a big advocate of it is there is nothing to identify it,” Hickey said. “A curveball might have a little hump to it, have some spin to it, a slider might have some spin to it.”

Hickey also believe it is the “easiest pitch to physically teach.”

And the Rays pitchers have taught the pitch to each other as well as any club in the sport. It makes their story less about an organizational philosophy, and more about the importance of handing down a skill from one generation to the next, having a master craftsman teach an apprentice.


Effectively Wild Episode 1032: The Outfield Impostor

EWFI

Ben Lindbergh and Jeff Sullivan banter about WBC tiebreakers and the efficacy of the infield shift, then answer listener emails about a Mike Trout body snatcher, dropped third strikes, bricks behind home plate, premature rebuilds, your WAR compared to Tim Tebow’s, new Statcast stats, and more.

Read the rest of this entry »


FanGraphs Audio: Eric Longenhagen on His Top-100 Prospects

Episode 724
Lead prospect analyst Eric Longenhagen is the guest on this edition of the pod. In this episode, he discusses certain themes that emerge from the top-100 prospect list he published earlier this week. He also elaborates on the possible value of a college game pitched by two starters who fail to break 90 mph.

Don’t hesitate to direct pod-related correspondence to @cistulli on Twitter.

You can subscribe to the podcast via iTunes or other feeder things.

Audio after the jump. (Approximately 1 hr 24 min play time.)

Read the rest of this entry »


FanGraphs After Dark Chat – 3/14/17

1:51
Paul Swydan:

Who do you think will win the World Baseball Classic?

Cuba (0% | 0 votes)
 
Dominican Republic (46.1% | 77 votes)
 
Israel (5.9% | 10 votes)
 
Japan (3.5% | 6 votes)
 
Netherlands (1.1% | 2 votes)
 
Puerto Rico (8.9% | 15 votes)
 
USA (18.5% | 31 votes)
 
Venezuela (1.1% | 2 votes)
 
I don’t care I’m not watching (10.7% | 18 votes)
 
I can’t decide!!!!! (3.5% | 6 votes)
 

Total Votes: 167
2:03
Paul Swydan:

Which movie debuting between now and the end of April are you most excited to see?

Beauty & The Beast (17.5% | 19 votes)
 
T2: Trainspotting (15.7% | 17 votes)
 
Life (6.4% | 7 votes)
 
Power Rangers (10.1% | 11 votes)
 
Ghost in the Shell (13.8% | 15 votes)
 
The Fate of the Furious (13.8% | 15 votes)
 
The Lost City of Z (8.3% | 9 votes)
 
The Circle (3.7% | 4 votes)
 
Sleight (0.9% | 1 vote)
 
Other (say in comments) (9.2% | 10 votes)
 

Total Votes: 108
4:24
Paul Swydan:

In honor of Pi Day, what is your favorite kind of pie?

Apple (20.4% | 39 votes)
 
Pecan (13.6% | 26 votes)
 
Sweet Potato (2.0% | 4 votes)
 
Blueberry/Strawberry/Cherry/other kind of berry (15.7% | 30 votes)
 
Chocolate Mousse (7.8% | 15 votes)
 
Pumpkin (9.9% | 19 votes)
 
Lemon Merengue (6.2% | 12 votes)
 
Rhubarb (5.2% | 10 votes)
 
Key Lime (12.5% | 24 votes)
 
Other (say in comments) (6.2% | 12 votes)
 

Total Votes: 191
9:01
Paul Swydan: Hi everybody!

9:01
Jeff Zimmerman: Hi

9:01
Paul Swydan: I’m disappointed so many of you want to see the horrifying live action Beauty and the Beast,

Read the rest of this entry »


Examining Two Years of Catch Probabilities

Earlier today, my first post about catch probability was published. In that post, I mostly looked at the two years of information, together. In here, I’d like to keep the two years separate. I mean, this is a whole new data source, with a number of potential applications. Why would I ever write just the one article and stop there? I have a weekly quota to hit, and this is better than whatever else there is to analyze.

Catch probability is a new Statcast metric, which you can read about here. As complicated as it might seem, it’s actually quite simple to understand, and it can give us better answers to questions people have been asking for decades. This is where you can find all the data, so you can poke around on your own. This is all brand new, and it’s kind of a first draft. The data will improve as adjustments are made for batted-ball direction and for outfield dimensions. Already, though, we can learn from what’s been provided.

Read the rest of this entry »


Yonder Alonso Has Changed His Mind

Have you seen what Yonder Alonso is doing this spring? You might not recognize it. If he qualified, his .421/.560/.789 line would the third-best in baseball. While it’s easy to dismiss a spring fling from an established player, this player spent the offseason thinking differently. Now he’s moving differently at the plate, too.

Read the rest of this entry »


Eric Longenhagen Prospects Chat, Pie

1:02
Eric A Longenhagen: Howdy, chat.

1:02
Eric A Longenhagen: You’re all perfect children of god. Let’s chat about baseball.

1:03
Eric A Longenhagen: Oh wait, top 100…

1:03
Eric A Longenhagen: Please check that out if you have yet to.

1:03
Eric A Longenhagen: OKay, now let’s start.

Read the rest of this entry »


One Cause for Optimism in Cincinnati

The Reds’ pitching staff was absolutely dreadful last year. Their rotation and bullpen were both the worst in baseball. With a ghastly -0.5 WAR, their staff was the worst since the 1800s, which basically means it was the worst of all time.

Not much has changed since last year. Here’s the current depth chart for the Cincinnati rotation:

Name IP K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BABIP LOB% ERA FIP WAR
Brandon Finnegan 171.0 8.2 3.9 1.4 .297 73.0 % 4.42 4.66 1.4
Anthony DeSclafani   136.0 7.7 2.4 1.2 .305 72.8 % 4.06 4.14 1.9
Scott Feldman 133.0 6.1 2.6 1.3 .305 69.6 % 4.65 4.65 1.1
Robert Stephenson 119.0 8.9 5.5 1.5 .301 71.8 % 5.07 5.25 0.5
Bronson Arroyo 117.0 5.0 2.2 1.8 .299 68.8 % 5.34 5.44 0.1
Homer Bailey   93.0 7.6 2.8 1.2 .309 70.7 % 4.37 4.27 1.1
Cody Reed 81.0 8.3 3.1 1.3 .306 72.8 % 4.24 4.38 0.9
Tim Adleman   37.0 6.6 3.0 1.5 .300 70.3 % 4.90 5.03 0.1
Austin Brice 19.0 8.0 4.2 1.3 .306 70.8 % 4.79 4.88 0.1
Amir Garrett 9.0 7.9 4.7 1.3 .303 71.6 % 4.77 4.94 0.1
Keury Mella 9.0 6.4 4.2 1.4 .306 69.1 % 5.27 5.32 0.0
Nick Travieso 9.0 6.4 4.0 1.4 .301 69.4 % 5.12 5.23 0.0
Total 933.0 7.4 3.3 1.4 .303 71.3 % 4.62 4.72 7.4

Brandon Finnegan is at the top, which is fine, I guess. After that, however, things go downhill in a hurry — especially with Homer Bailey and Anthony DeSclafani slated to open the year on the DL. For example: both Bronson Arroyo and Scott Feldman are apparently not only still pitching, but are penciled in for 250 innings in Cincinnati’s rotation. The rest of the list is made up of unproven youngsters. Each of them has some promise, but none have had much success in the major leagues, either. Hence their middling projections.

Read the rest of this entry »