Adam Jones Addresses “Baseball Is a White Man’s Sport”

Adam Jones created a bit of a stir when he told Bob Nightengale of USA Today that “baseball is a white man’s sport.” That’s understandable. Race can be a hot-button issue at the best of times, and given the current climate — Colin Kaepernick, Black Lives Matter, the presidential race — these are volatile times.

Jones addressed his controversial comment with a group of reporters prior to tonight’s game at Fenway Park. The Baltimore Orioles outfielder spoke at length, and he did so thoughtfully and honestly. Here are a few excerpts:

“At the end of the day, I’m one of the most known black players in baseball. There are 58 or 59 of us…Baseball is numbers. It’s eight percent black. I didn’t make that up. In football and basketball the numbers are in the 60s and 70s. These aren’t made up numbers. It just is what it is. I’m part of the eight percent.

“If you can’t handle the truth… I backed it up with stats. We’re a numbers game right now… Everybody wants to talk analytical. I gave numbers. I gave facts. I’m still getting the anguish and hate and disgust, but at the end of the day I know I have the respect of my peers.

“Here is my biggest thing with it. Society doesn’t mind us helping out the hood and the inner cities, but they have a problem when we speak about the hood and the inner cities. I don’t understand that part.”


How to Think of Postseason Contention, Elimination

We’re at that time of the regular season during which most teams are making a final push to clinch a spot in the postseason. Some teams (such as the Cubs) have basically already clinched a spot and some others (such as the Twins) are already mathematically eliminated. Most teams fall somewhere in between.

Many baseball fans will look at the standings every day in September. If they see their favorite team is leading its respective division, they’ll hope that, for the rest of the regular season, that team win will more games than anyone else in the division, thus allowing that team to become the division champion. This is guaranteed.

If they see, on the other hand, that their favorite team is not leading its respective division, they will check the number of games remaining and the number of games by which their team is behind the division leader. If the number of games remaining is greater than the number of games behind, then they can hold out hope that their team can win the division by winning all its remaining games, while the division leader loses all their remaining games. Unfortunately, this is not always guaranteed.

The type of error is made not only by Average Joe sports fans, but also professional sportswriters.  This article will describe these tricky scenarios in which teams are eliminated from postseason contention.

Read the rest of this entry »


Custom Date Range Added to Splits Tool

A few weeks ago we added a custom splits tool to our player pages. This weekend, we added the ability to select a specific date range. To do this, we added the “Time Frame” control bar, which now contains all date-related splits and controls.

The “Filter” menu is the old “Time Frame” splits menu. This gives you the option to view plate appearances occurring in a month or season half, and the day or night time-of-day split. These are different from a custom date range. Choosing the “May” split in the filter menu will display plate appearances from every May. This would be used for getting career stats in May.

Date Range Splits Tool

To look at splits from a specific date, there’s a drop-down calendar with which you can select the start date and end date. This will limit the splits to those specific days. This can be useful if you want to look at splits after a player returns from an injury, a trade or an adjustment. We’ve also included preset ranges like the last 30 days or the past calendar year.

Read the rest of this entry »


Eric Longenhagen Prospects Chat 9/12

1:02
Eric A Longenhagen: Morning, everyone. Gonna let Szym finish his chat before I get going here. Fell free to pump questions into the queue and I’ll get rolling when he’s done.

1:39
Eric A Longenhagen: Okay everyone, let’s get rolling.

1:39
CJ: Tell me how to feel about Dylan Cease and his ridiculous stuff.

1:40
Eric A Longenhagen: I think you should feel excited but I caution you to let your guard down because the guy has a pretty lengthy injury history. Only allow yourself to be vulnerable if you can deal with a broken heart.

1:40
LA: How do you like the possibility of Yohander Mendez helping out the Texas rotation as early as spring training next year?

1:41
Eric A Longenhagen: Non-zero chance, the stuff is certainly good enough, but I think it’s more likely he starts next year in the minors.

Read the rest of this entry »


Dan Szymborski FanGraphs Chat – 9/12/16

11:56
Dan Szymborski: Gravy fries!

11:57
Dan Szymborski: Not eating any, just felt like saying it.

11:57
Dan Szymborski: For those that don’t remember, I’m saving off-topic Qs for the Lightning Round.

11:57
Steve BartMandelay: DOOM AND GLOOM; DOOM AND GLOOM; etc.

11:57
Erik: The Cubs may set the BABIP-suppression record while shifting the least among everyone in the league. What’s going on there? Would they have an even better defense if they shifted more, or have they discovered a flaw in shifting that the rest of the league and all the analysts haven’t found yet?

11:58
Dan Szymborski: I think that the hoopla around shifting is a little overheated. It’s good, but it’s not a game-changer type of thing generally.

Read the rest of this entry »


The Elite Skill You Won’t Find on Javy Baez’s Scouting Report

Certain people on a baseball field possess the type of abilities that lend themselves to being noticed. It’s very easy to notice Giancarlo Stanton when he hits a massive home run. It’s tough to miss Noah Syndergaard pumping 101-mph fastballs in the first inning. Others possess the type of abilities that only become noticed when things go wrong. We don’t really notice the first-base umpire until he blows the call that ruins a perfect game. Nobody knows the third-base coach’s name until he holds the runner that could’ve changed the World Series. And then there’s a third group who possess extraordinary abilities, one way or another, that go completely unnoticed. Someone is the best in the world at playing ricochets off the wall in the outfield, but we’ve got no real way of knowing. There’s a king of the “second-base-glove-flip-to-first,” but we haven’t crowned him.

For some time, Javier Baez existed in that third group, of having an elite skill that’s not as obvious as hitting a home run or throwing 100. Lately, he’s been moving into group one. It’s getting hard not to notice Javy Baez’s tag game.

Read the rest of this entry »


NERD Game Scores for September 12, 2016

Devised originally in response to a challenge issued by sabermetric nobleman Rob Neyer, and expanded at the request of nobody, NERD scores represent an attempt to summarize in one number (and on a scale of 0-10) the likely aesthetic appeal or watchability, for the learned fan, of a player or team or game. Read more about the components of and formulae for NERD scores here.

***

Most Highly Rated Game
Baltimore at Boston | 19:10 ET
Miley (146.0 IP, 100 xFIP-) vs. Price (197.2 IP, 80 xFIP-)
What one finds here is very nearly the closest thing to an ideal scenario at this point in the season: a pair of clubs separated by merely two games at the top of their division and two starters with their own relative merits. David Price has produced some of the best fielding-independent numbers in the majors. As for Wade Miley, whatever his shortcomings wherein “run prevention” is concerned, he at least works quickly. Regard: his 17.8-second pace between pitches is the quickest such figure among all qualifiers. (While Price’s 25.3 mark is the slowest.)

Readers’ Preferred Broadcast: Baltimore Television.

Read the rest of this entry »


When to Give Up an Out on the Bases

With just 27 of them per team in any game, outs are a rather precious commodity. It’s important not to give them away, as letting them go often decreases the chance of scoring. Even so, there are some situations in which outs are given away and it’s regarded as advantageous. For example, a pitcher, who is likely quite bad at hitting, is often called to sacrifice bunt, moving a runner over as opposed to the more likely outcome of merely recording an unproductive out by means of strikeout, pop up, ground ball, etc.

There are other so-called “productive outs,” like moving a runner from second to third with a ground ball to the right side or hitting a sacrifice fly, but those situations are more likely to be a happy accident than intentional — i.e. a player was attempting to record a productive hit, but made an out that happened to provide an ancillary benefit. Finally, there’s still another form another potential productive out, in which a base-runner gives himself up so that another runner has a a better chance to score. Let’s explore whether that move is productive or beneficial.

While you’ve likely seen this type of play before, let’s go through a brief example. Earlier this season, Jhonny Peralta stepped to the plate with one out and runners on first and third. Brandon Moss, the runner at third, doesn’t possess great speed and has produced a negative base-running figure over the course his career. Yadier Molina, the runner on first, is a Molina. Peralta hit a fly ball to shallow center field. Coco Crisp, the center fielder, doesn’t have a very strong arm, but given how shallow the play was and Moss’ lack of blazing speed at third base, there was a reasonable chance to throw Moss out at the plate if the latter ran. Moss did run, the throw was slightly off line, and it was cut off by Yonder Alonso, who threw to second base. Max Muncy then chased after Molina, who was running back towards first, caught up to him for the out, but not before Moss was safely at home.

The embedded video below shows the play in full.

So did Molina make the smart play by giving himself up? It’s difficult to know for certain. With the benefit of hindsight, we can see that the throw likely would not have gotten Moss at the plate, rendering Molina’s sacrifice unnecessary. However, that’s not information Molina had at the time he decided to run. If you listen to the clip above with sound, you can hear broadcaster Ricky Horton say, “I don’t know” as the play began to materialize, questioning aloud whether Moss should run. The play itself did not do much to increase the Cardinals’ chances of winning, moving them from 81.5% win expectancy to 83.3% in the game. Of course, those numbers come before and after the play, and the decision we are discussing occurred in the middle of the play after an out was made.

Read the rest of this entry »


Rich Hill and the Conflicting Priorities of History

On Saturday night, Rich Hill was perfect. The Marlins sent 21 batters to the plate against him, and all 21 walked back to the dugout. But when the 22nd batter came up to hit, he did not see Rich Hill; he saw Joe Blanton instead. Faced with a choice of letting Hill chase history or preserve his team’s #2 starter for the postseason, manager Dave Roberts chose the latter, removing Hill from after seven perfect innings and 89 pitches thrown. After the game, he explained his decision.

“I’m going to lose sleep tonight,” Roberts said. “And I probably should.”

His voice was gravelly and low, unable to find joy even as hip-hop blared in the clubhouse. He suspected he will never “have to make a tougher decision” than the choice he made in Saturday’s seventh inning.

“I’m very, very sensitive to his personal achievements,” Roberts said. “I really am. But nothing should get in the way, or compromise, our team goal.”

Read the rest of this entry »


NERD Game Scores for September 11, 2016

Devised originally in response to a challenge issued by sabermetric nobleman Rob Neyer, and expanded at the request of nobody, NERD scores represent an attempt to summarize in one number (and on a scale of 0-10) the likely aesthetic appeal or watchability, for the learned fan, of a player or team or game. Read more about the components of and formulae for NERD scores here.

***

Most Highly Rated Game
Boston at Toronto | 13:07 ET
Buchholz (117.1 IP, 122 xFIP-) vs. Sanchez (169.1 IP, 85 xFIP-)
The implications of this game, like the two before it in the series, are clear: a victory improves the winner’s probability of claiming the division by a not insubstantial amount. How not insubstantial? Regard the following table. It documents Boston and Toronto’s odds of winning the division (Div%) before the beginning of the series, after the Red Sox’ game-one victory, and after the Blue Jays’ win last night.

Playoff Implications, Red Sox and Blue Jays
Event BOS Div% TOR Div% Change for BOS Change for TOR
Before Series 56.3% 32.5%
BOS Wins Game 1 67.4% 23.8% +11.1% -8.7%
TOR Wins Game 2 57.2% 31.6% -10.2% +7.8%

The figures in the two rightmost columns document the change in probability for each club following the relevant event. Because the two clubs are differently situated with regard to wild-card qualification (or complete absence from the postseason altogether), the differences in their divisional probabilities haven’t been entirely reciprocal. Regardless, each game has been worth approximately 10 points. This remains the case for tonight, as well, naturally.

Readers’ Preferred Broadcast: Toronto Radio.

Read the rest of this entry »