Red Sox Add Walker Buehler to Talented, Risk-Filled Rotation

With their trade for Garrett Crochet back in early December, the Red Sox indicated their intention to aggressively compete for the AL East crown in 2025. The Yankees missing out on Juan Soto, along with the relative inaction of the Orioles and Blue Jays this offseason, has opened that window for Boston. And the Sox have continued to add talent to their pitching staff, signing Walker Buehler to a one-year deal two days before Christmas. The contract will guarantee Buehler $21.05 million, which also happens to be the exact value of the qualifying offer the Red Sox extended to Nick Pivetta and that the Dodgers declined to offer to Buehler. There’s also a $25 million mutual option for 2026 and as much as $2.5 million in performance bonuses for hitting games started thresholds.
After undergoing his second Tommy John surgery in 2022, Buehler finally returned to a major league mound last May, but he really struggled to find his footing after being sidelined for nearly two full years. A June hip injury limited him to just 16 starts and 75.1 innings, and his 5.38 ERA and 5.54 FIP were easily the worst marks of his career. Despite his summer scuffles, Buehler managed to turn things around during the playoffs. He pitched to a 3.60 ERA across 15 postseason innings, including a gutsy scoreless start in Game 3 of the World Series and the first save of his career in the decisive Game 5.
Of course, Buehler was one of the most successful young starters in baseball from 2018–21. Among all qualified pitchers during that stretch, he ranked seventh in WAR, sixth in ERA-, and eighth in FIP-. But postseason heroics aside, 2024 was a pretty miserable year for Buehler. He couldn’t find consistency with his mechanics, and that hip injury seemed to disrupt any progress he was making on that front. He was marginally better after returning from the IL in August and he was able to make a few key adjustments to his mechanics down the stretch — no doubt helping him find some limited success in October — but he entered this offseason as an enigmatic free agent. His early career success was undeniable, but his injury history and disappointing return raised a lot of questions about his ability to contribute quality innings moving forward.
At the core of Buehler’s issues was a four-seam fastball whose quality had deteriorated from elite to merely mediocre. At his peak, Buehler’s heater and its elite ride generated a whiff nearly a quarter of the time a batter offered at it, while also suppressing damage against it when opponents did manage to put it in play. That pitch began to slip in 2022 after the sticky stuff ban went into effect, and a slight dip in his release point — perhaps an advance indicator of the injury he’d sustain midseason that year — led to a sizeable drop in the amount of ride he was generating. His four-seamer didn’t rebound after he returned to the mound after his surgery. Its average velocity sat a tick and a half below where it was in 2019, its whiff rate was a meager 16.9%, and opposing batters produced a .451 xwOBA against it. It’s no surprise that he cut back on his usage of that pitch in favor of a sinker and hard cutter.
Despite its history as an elite pitch, Buehler’s best path forward likely doesn’t involve throwing his heater all that often, and by joining the Red Sox, he might well have sealed that pitch’s fate. With Craig Breslow and Andrew Bailey helming their pitching development lab, the team implemented a staff-wide approach that deemphasized four-seam fastballs in favor of offspeed or breaking pitches. Their philosophy essentially boils down to “stop throwing bad fastballs so much.” That plan likely led to the breakout seasons enjoyed by Tanner Houck and Kutter Crawford and contributed to a much better than expected pitching staff as a whole, though as I’ll discuss later, that breaker-heavy approach might be due for some adjustments of its own given the staff’s second half performance. The Red Sox might push Buehler to drop the usage of that pitch even further than he did in 2024, and thankfully, he has a deep enough repertoire to find a viable mix without it.
Buehler’s one-inning appearance in Game 5 of the World Series could be a preview of what his pitch mix looks like in 2025. He threw 16 pitches in that outing, with 10 of them curveballs and just four of them four-seamers. All three outs were recorded on a breaking ball, and he recorded three whiffs on seven swings against his big breaker. While he won’t be able to get away with such a curveball-heavy mix as a starting pitcher in longer outings, all three of his breaking pitches — a knuckle curve, sweeper, and hard cutter/slider — should see a lot more emphasis with the Red Sox.
For Boston, signing Buehler solidifies a starting rotation that already excelled last year and added Crochet to front the staff. Those two new additions will join a deep group including Houck, Crawford, Brayan Bello, Lucas Giolito, Richard Fitts, Quinn Priester, and Cooper Criswell. Still, their surprising overall success in 2024 hid some concerns that cropped up during the second half of the season. Their starting rotation went from an 85 ERA- and 92 FIP-, fourth and sixth in the majors, respectively, during the first half of the season to a 95 ERA- (12th) and 110 FIP- (22nd) after the All-Star break. Houck and Crawford, in particular, seemed to hit a wall during the dog days of summer. The decline of their starting rotation was a big reason why the Red Sox slipped out of the playoff picture in August and September. The wear from workload increases likely played a part in their second half slump, but it’s also possible the league adjusted to their new approach, necessitating further tinkering in 2025.
Between workload concerns and the recent injury history of many of their starters, the Red Sox have a lot of risk baked into their rotation:
| Name | 2024 IP | +/- 2023 IP | Career High IP | Days Lost to IL, 2022-24 | Recent Injury History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Crochet | 146 | +121 | 146 | 330 | Shoulder inflammation (2023), Tommy John surgery (2022) |
| Tanner Houck | 178.2 | +64 | 178.2 | 127 | Facial fracture (2023), Lumbar injury (2022) |
| Brayan Bello | 165 | +2 | 165 | 62 | Lat tightness (2024), Elbow inflammation (2023) |
| Kutter Crawford | 183.2 | +51.1 | 183.2 | 54 | Hamstring strain (2023), Shoulder impingement (2022) |
| Walker Buehler | 124.2 | +122.2 | 207.2 | 449 | Hip inflammation (2024), Tommy John surgery (2022-23) |
| Lucas Giolito | 0 | -184.1 | 184.1 | 207 | Internal brace surgery (2024) |
| Patrick Sandoval | 79.2 | -65 | 148.2 | 107 | Internal brace surgery (2024) |
| Garrett Whitlock | 23 | -69.2 | 120.1 | 306 | Internal brace surgery (2024), elbow inflammation (2023), hip surgery (2022) |
| Richard Fitts | 137.1 | -15.1 | 152.2 | 0 | None |
| Cooper Criswell | 125 | +7.1 | 125 | 110 | Shoulder inflammation (2022) |
| Quinn Priester | 121.2 | -36.1 | 158 | 36 | Lat tightness (2024) |
Five of their starters set career highs in innings pitched last year, four added more than 50 innings year-over-year from 2023 to 2024, and seven have lost more than 100 days to the injured list over the last three years. Crochet’s workload and innings limit last year has seen plenty of discussion already and Giolito is returning from an internal brace procedure that wiped out his entire season. Both Houck and Crawford significantly increased their workloads in 2024, and last year was essentially the first time the latter had made it through an entire season without a trip to the IL.
The depth now present in the organization likely buttresses against the attrition that is sure to hit in 2025. Breslow has already hinted at the possibility of using a six-man rotation to guard against some of this risk. That would certainly help alleviate some of the workload concerns, and allow pitchers like Crochet, Buehler, and Giolito, who are each hoping to see significant innings increases in 2025, to pitch into a potential postseason run. The knock-on effect of adding a high-upside guy like Buehler is that guys like Houck, Crawford, and Bello are now slotted into the three, four, and five spots, lessening the pressure on them to lead the rotation. And if everything goes right — if Houck and Crawford pitch like their first-half selves for an entire season, Bello takes a step forward, and Crochet, Buehler, and Giolito remain healthy — Boston could have the makings of one of the best rotations in baseball.
For Buehler, a one-year pillow deal allows him to redefine himself as a pitcher without his trademark four-seam fastball, and do so with the help of one of the more promising pitching development labs in baseball. If he’s able to hone his pitch mix, lean on his breaking balls a little more, and find success with a new approach, he can reenter the market in 2026 looking for a bigger long-term deal. There are a lot of ifs on both sides of the equation here, but this deal looks like a perfect fit.
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
Great insight. Thanks.
Is the future of high-spending teams going to be 6 man rotations? Wouldn’t this result in having many elite pitchers throwing fewer innings over a season, theoretically reducing their injury risk, increasing efficacy, and affording hilarious permutations for playoffs? Is there a downside other than cost? Maybe locking in too many pitchers on multi year deals reduces roster flex?
edit: I’m not saying necessarily that Buehler qualifies as elite (or that there are enough elite pitchers for a majority of teams to do this), but ultimately, do we think there will be a shift to 6 man rotations, especially by those that can afford it?
The benefit of a 6-man rotation would have to be either that pitchers stay healthier or pitch better than in a 5-man rotation. I don’t think anyone really understands pitcher health, but you should be able to use pitch data to see whether pitcher’s stuff plays up with an extra day of rest, similar to how stuff plays up with a move to the bullpen.
One downside to a 6-man rotation is that the team has 1 fewer bullen arm. Starters would need to pitch deeper into games, which is the opposite of recent trends.
If we’re making predictions, I think teams will generally stick to 5-man rotations.
I think the present is (some) high spending teams spending all of their money on upside and ignoring injury risk entirely. Whether or not this is a good idea, I don’t know. It works if your lineup has Mookie Betts and Shohei Ohtani in it.
Six man rotations to keep guys healthy, usually that doesn’t seem like a great downstream option there unless you’re already likely to make the playoffs because you’re taking those high-priced arms and using them less when you’d much rather be using them more to actually win games. The gap between your #1 and #2 and your #6 should be pretty wide, and even more so if your #3 or #4 gets hurt and you have to roll with a #7 in the last spot.
To follow up on this a bit:
I think a six-man rotation works if you have a pitcher who strongly prefers a 6-man rotation (like, that’s what they did in Japan and you want to accommodate them) or you have a hard innings cap on your better starters because they haven’t built up much (like maybe they’re a rookie who raced through the minors). Otherwise, it doesn’t really make sense to have a six man rotation.
I mean, the Red Sox might want to manage Crochet’s innings limit. But unless Richard Fitts and Hunter Dobbins or whoever it is aren’t that different from Tanner Houck, you’re reducing the likelihood of getting to both Crochet and Houck. Why would you do that to yourself?
Another example: Yankees could theoretically do this, but it’s super not a good idea to pre-emptively hold back starts for Gerrit Cole and Max Fried and Clarke Schmidt to give the ball to Marcus Stroman every 6th day.
Here are some teams where it might make sense:
1) The Guardians have a huge number of young guys who might need their innings limited, plus the oft-injured Triston McKenzie and maybe eventually Shane Bieber. It’s not all that obvious that Slade Cecconi, Joey Cantillo, and Logan Allen are that different than Ben Lively or Luis L. Ortiz. If you can prevent one of them from blowing out their arms, they have plenty of depth to keep a six-man rotation going even with nagging injuries without diluting the top of the rotation too much.
2) The Nationals have a similar situation. Mackenzie Gore is similar to Tanner Bibee, in that you don’t want to dilute their innings. But I can’t tell you in advance which of Jake Irvin, Mitchell Parker, DJ Herz, Trevor Williams, and the Mike Soroka experiment is going to be the second best one in 2025. What would be really bad is if that #2 guys who emerges blows out his arm this year.
3) The Marlins have Sandy Alcantara, Braxton Garrett, and Eury Perez all coming back from injury, plus Max Meyer is a young guy. They all need to have their workload managed a bit, and there’s not another good pitcher here who doesn’t need their
high-spending teams is going to be to spend only for upside and disregard injury risk.
If pitchers are starting every 6th day, they really need to work deeper in games, otherwise the bullpen blows out. Its easier to manage workload with a 5-man rotation and 75 inning starts than a 6-man rotation and 90 inning starts, even for the Guardians/Nats/Marlins.
I have a feeling Breslow said they’re thinking about a 6-man rotation to avoid speculation about which of the 6 would be left out. Maybe Giolito stays in extended spring training then replaces whichever starter is injured first. Once the season starts, they probably won’t have to worry about having too many starters.
I have a hard time imagining Giolito is ready to go at first and everyone stays healthy until he gets back.
It seems like there are lots of potentially better options than a 6-man rotation if you want to limit innings for a handful of guys. Start them in the bullpen and stretch them out over the season, skip starts, or even give them a later start to the season.
Sox need about 54 innings per week (on the high end – 6 game week) between 13 pitchers.
Whats stopped a them from having 7 man rotation (assuming they re-sign Pivetta)? There’s a good chance some of their guys get injured anyways, so good to have the depth.
Day 1: Crochet 5ip + top 4 RP
Day 2: Houck 4 IP + Whitlock 3 IP + Top 2 RP
Day 3: Bello 4 IP + Kutter 4IP + Closer
Day 4: Buehler 5 IP + 4 RP (Closer rest day)
Day 5: Pivetta 5 IP + Whitlock 3 IP
Day 6: Giolito 5 IP + Houck 4 IP
Since they would have 5 “horses” (ie can throw 5 IP with reliably good ratios) and 3 guys you’d trust more in 3 inning stints, this could work. On all days except day 4, you’re getting elite pitching, and on day 4, it’s not bad, just league-avg.
Sox are good at finding RP off the scrap-heap, and can backfill the bullpen as needed. What’s harder to replace is the 4-5 IP starters, so if one gets injured, you revert more to a traditional 5 or 6MR. By limiting the IP for each guy, you also reduce inj risk.
I am not sure if the number of days between starts, whether it’s 4 or 5, is going to make a whole lot of difference as far as injury risk, but it seems that how much stress the arm is under in a single appearance may be a bigger factor. It seems to me that relief pitchers get inured less often than starters, so why not go to tandem starters between 6 guys, where you pitch maybe 3-4 innings per start, and the second guy comes in for the same, and then you may not need a 7th inning guy, AND an 8th inning guy, AND a closer. One of the drawbacks to this, though, is the second guy in the tandem may be under-utilized if you want to make late game substitutions for R/L matchups. But that may be a small price to pay if such an arrangement really results in lowering injury risk, not to mention you can tandem two totally different pitching styles, and one lefty and the other righty to cause matchup fits during lineup construction of the opposing team.
I guess the Red Sox are going to sign each offseason’s “obviously broken 30-year-old former ace” from now on? Like, if Bieber comes back next year and looks awful, that’s exactly the demographic the Red Sox are leaning on here with Buehler and Giolito.
Severino was that guy last offseason, though, and he went to the Mets and it actually sort of worked out for them.
This is really a half measure. Buehler’s been hurt a lot or ineffective. They should’ve really gotten Fried or Burnes (even though Burnes looked like he preferred the West Coast). The rotation is really high variance with regard to injury and performance, but it could all work out. Or they could be giving Richard Fitts meaningful starts in April. They should’ve gone for the jugular with the AL East getting weaker and the AL in general being wide open. If they sign Bregman I’ll change my tone a bit, but they’re the Red Sox, they could’ve signed Bregman AND Fried and still remain under the luxury tax threshold. I still think they’re a mid to upper 80s win team, but in this playoff format in a weak AL, that’s a playoff team.
It seems clear they don’t want to sign pitchers to long-term contracts and prefer short-term/high-risk deals. A couple years ago it was Paxton and Wacha. Maybe one of Buehler or Giolito will hit this time. Maybe Sandoval next year. Maybe.
I’m not sure where Bregman would play. Devers has nowhere to move, and the sox have plenty of options at 2B. What they need is someone who can play SS when Story inevitably gets hurt, or a full time SS who pushes Story into a utility role. A better fit would have been Adames.
It’s clear they don’t want to hand out any big money contracts. They were forced to with Devers. They couldn’t let him walk after losing Betts and Xander. If they go that route, they need to do 4-5 year deals like the Dodgers did with Snell. If you’re not going to sign big money pitchers you need to develop or trade for an ace. Which I guess they technically did with Crochet but outside of last season, he’s barely pitched so he’s a massive risk. He could win Cy Young or pitch like 50 innings.
I’d put Bregman at 2B for sure. Grissom is an OK player and Rafaela can’t hit. Bregman might be a 3 win upgrade at 2B. Especially in Fenway. As for SS, I think Story is fine. He can’t hit anymore, but if he puts up an 80ish wRC+ he’ll be at least a league average player with his defense. I agree Adames would’ve fit better. But Marcelo Mayer will be ready maybe at mid-season.
Adames was the best choice for sure, but they got distracted by Soto and he got away. As good as Marcelo Mayer looks when he is healthy, I don’t think relying on him or Trevor Story to stay healthy is reasonable.
IMO Devers and Casas could split time between 1B and DH to make way for Bregman. He could hit a lot of doubles at Fenway…
I am wondering where Sandoval fits in once he returns potentially after the all star break.