The A’s Deserve Your Attention, Again
On this date one year ago, the baseball season was in the midst of its brief halt for the All-Star Game in Washington, D.C. For the Oakland Athletics, it felt as if the season was just getting started. Through the end of May, the team had merely been average, at least by the most traditional statistic: win-loss record. On May 31, the A’s were 29-28. But a 68-37 record (a 105-win pace) over their final 105 games turned a decent season into an excellent one. The A’s finished 97-65, the franchise’s best record since 2002, en route to capturing the second AL Wild Card spot.
In 2019, the Athletics are writing the script to a sequel. On May 31, the team was again 29-28, but since that time, their 26-13 record is the second-best in the American League and the fourth-best in baseball overall. During this stretch, their pitching has been remarkable:
| Team | Innings | ERA | FIP | xFIP | K% | BB% | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationals | 331.0 | 3.43 | 3.67 | 4.07 | 24.9% | 7.0% | 6.8 |
| Athletics | 351.2 | 3.63 | 3.93 | 4.58 | 19.9% | 6.5% | 6.5 |
| Dodgers | 358.1 | 3.09 | 3.67 | 3.68 | 26.2% | 6.2% | 5.9 |
| Rays | 379.2 | 4.08 | 3.85 | 3.82 | 25.8% | 7.2% | 5.6 |
| Indians | 331.0 | 3.70 | 4.10 | 4.09 | 26.6% | 7.6% | 5.2 |
At the front of this charge is Mike Fiers. He has been the Athletics’ most valuable pitcher over the last six weeks, leading a rotation that includes Chris Bassitt (3.95 FIP since June 1), Brett Anderson (4.55), Daniel Mengden (4.77), and the recently-acquired Homer Bailey. Based on name value alone, that’s clearly not the most sterling group of arms, but they are currently getting the job done.
For the pitching staff, regression seems likely, and the team’s depth is thin. The Athletics are already down two starting pitchers. Sean Manaea has not pitched this season and is still working his way back from shoulder surgery. Frankie Montas was suspended 80 games after testing positive for a PED on June 21. With this in mind, they might need to acquire more starting pitching to continue this run. After trading for Bailey, A’s general manager David Forst told Martin Gallegos of MLB.com that the front office will “keep an eye on starters, but we have a lot of conversations going on for relievers right now.” (For what it is worth, Oakland’s bullpen has produced 4.5 WAR, second to only the Yankees.)
The offense has also looked impressive during this time, and I’d argue that there are fewer remaining question marks here. Since June 1, the unit has produced the sixth-highest wRC+ in baseball. This seems more sustainable than their recent pitching performance:
| Team | Hard% | Rank | LD% + FB% | Rank | xwOBA | Rank | xwOBACON | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athletics | 41.5% | 5th | 59.7% | 6th | 0.336 | 5th | 0.387 | 7th |
Third baseman Matt Chapman, who is one of the game’s most underrated players, has been the Athletics’ best position player this season. And since the beginning of June, he has hit .295/.380/.561 with a 148 wRC+ over 159 plate appearances, all while playing elite defense. He has been almost as valuable as Cody Bellinger.
But the A’s are receiving production from more than just Chapman. Ramón Laureano, who started the year quite cold, is on a tear. He’s hit .297/.353/.645 during this time, and his 13 home runs tie him for sixth-most in the majors. One player Laureano is tied with is fellow-Athletic Matt Olson, who has quietly hit 20 home runs in 263 PA. If it weren’t for an early-season hand injury, he’d be on a 49-homer pace (over 650 PA). Marcus Semien has also been excellent this entire year, and that has remained the case in the past month-and-a-half.
That’s a very brief summary of the Athletics’ recent run. What we should consider now is what this may mean for the rest of the season. To no surprise, since the start of June, no team in the American League has increased their odds of making the postseason by as much as the Athletics, who now have a 26.8% chance to at least secure a Wild Card spot. That figure is up 16.6 points:

Similarly, the A’s are now projected to win 88.5 games. That’s a 5.9-game improvement, also tops in the AL in that stretch. By our projections, Oakland is still well behind Houston (100.6 wins) in the AL West race, but just as the gap has closed in the standings, the separation has also waned in their projected wins. The Athletics are now 7.8 games closer to the Astros than they were at the beginning of June. As of this writing, the Athletics have a better run differential (+98) than the Astros (+95), too. And, lastly, watching this team is pretty fun; by Craig Edwards’ Exhilaration Index, the A’s were the ninth-most exciting team in the first half.
All of this information might suggest that the AL West race could become closer in the coming weeks. Billy Beane would agree. As he told MLB.com’s Mike Lupica on Wednesday, “What we’ve done again is play well enough to play our way into the conversation.”
With some excellent play over the last six weeks, the Athletics are right in the thick of the pennant race. As it stands right now, they probably aren’t World Series contenders, but they certainly deserve your attention as the second half gets into full swing.
Devan Fink is a Contributor at FanGraphs. You can follow him on Twitter @DevanFink.
Puk and Luzardo merit some mention even if it’s to say they’re unlikely to matter
Yeah. I think there’s a chance we see Puk at the end of the year, if only as a reliever, but they’re going to be extra careful with Luzardo. Can’t wait to see them all out there though.
I would never rule out Billy Beane and his creativity, but unless he wants to deal away their top 4 prospects (not likely) he’s stuck trying to market some guys who can’t make contact (Beck, Lazarito), a couple of guys with decent years but who weren’t rated that highly beforehand (Neuse, Nick Allen, Jameson Hannah), and a couple of post-hype guys (Mateo, Kaprielian).
That’s not a lot to work with so I’m not sure exactly how much he’s going to be adding here, or of what value. But it sure does make sense to buy, as long as you aren’t giving up guys who could very well help this year if things go well (Puk, Luzardo, and Murphy).
Puk maybe but it looks unlikely Luzardo will make it up in 2019. Before the season I was hoping Murphy would be the starting catcher by now but barring a bunch of injuries I’m not seeing how that would work.
Not to mention Mark Canha with a 254 BA, 386 OB, 558 SLG, and 944 OPS on the season.
Would love to see them add a Boyd or Stroman but fear they would be too expensive in terms of trade demands, since they involve team control next year as well, something the A’s don’t necessarily need with Puk/Manaea/Luzardo/Montas presumably available next year, on top of Fiers/Bassitt/Mengden/maybe even Anderson. Wheeler would normally be more reasonable as a two month rental and possible wild card game starter, but the Mets seem to want too much for him, per the published rumors.
Plus Wheeler is on the IL. I’d actually trade Luzardo plus other stuff for Strohman if that’s all he would cost.
You are insane then. Stroman is a mid rotation starter, Luzardo is a top 20 prospect in baseball. Stroman will land a 50 FV and a 45 FV or two at most not a 60 FV.
Luzardo for Stroman and Giles would actually be not ridiculous for either side. I don’t think the A’s do that right now, but if they stay hot close to the deadline…
What is xwOBACON? I’m not familar with the CON endfix.
xwOBA on contact.
So…it doesn’t really taste better than xwOBA?
Doesn’t taste as good as bacon, anyway.
The A’s have deserved your attention all season long. You just didn’t care to notice.
When Brett Anderson’s name came up, I thought, “Holy crap! Brett Anderson is still starting for them! He has to be approximately 100 years old!” I looked it up and he’s 31. Does anyone else just feel like he’s been around for an eternity, or was it just me?
My memeory is a bit fuzzy but as a long time A’s fan I am pretty sure he was promoted from double-A to the majors at 20.
What I wonder is, how do they get by not striking anyone outare o? Is it a new market deal, or are they getting lucky and all these guys will just turn into pumpkins next year? One of these things is not like the other in the first graph (k rate) Today I watched Zach Davies pitch, and then I looked at his pathetic K rate, and his fip, and I wonder if some teams are better at getting results out of guys? Maybe pitchers pitch better knowing they sure as hell aren’t going to see the lineup the third time through unless its a very low risk situation? I honestly don’t know what it is, but 3 out of 4 years Davies has put up very solid numbers with a K rate that is Mid 5s or low 6s. His bad year, his era was still about league average. While he is obviously getting lucky, he reminds me of the Athletics running a bunch of castoffs who hardly strike anyone out year in and year out and remaining competitive.
Maybe it is both those two teams have extremely high K% bullpens? Maybe there is some correlation? A lot of incoherent rambling, but maybe they are on to something?
> how do they get by not striking anyone out
They do strike people out, just not as many, but …
… they have the AL’s best overall infield defense, favor grounder-heavy pitchers, and play in a flyball-pitcher’s park.
Against the AL West teams that don’t play in Houston, they’re 23 -15 (a 0.605 win% that would be good for 98 wins over a season). Against the Astros, they’re 1 – 7. Not that the division was in reach anyway (Fangraphs has it at a 1.7% chance), but they have a 22% chance of making the wild card, and acquitted themselves quite well against their likely wild card opponents: 3 – 4 against the Red Sox, 2 – 2 against the Twins, and 4 -3 against the Rays (they’ve yet to play the Yankees, should the AL East order turn over again). But of course some or all of those teams will be getting better also, and anything can happen in one game.
Fortunately for the A’s, they have zero chance of meeting the Blue Jays, who inexplicably swept them twice. Baseball!
They have home-field advantage in a WC game over the Rays and Indians.
They also have a record of 32-25 against teams over .500 – Indians 15-21, Rays 28-32, Red Sox 18-27, Rangers 26-34.
They’re literally the only AL wild card contender with a winning record against winning teams.
Unfortunately, beating winning teams (when comparing two teams with the same run differential) has no predictive value for the postseason.