The Best Hitter You’ve Never Heard Of

A year ago, Hunter Dozier got his first real taste of the big leagues and it did not go well. In nearly 400 plate appearances, Dozier struck out a lot, walked very little, and did not run the bases well or add anything of value defensively. His calling card to the majors, and the tool that got him drafted in the top-10 in 2013, is his power, and he was merely average there. Dozier was below replacement-level a year ago, and at 27 years old heading into 2019, he looked like a replacement-level player with some upside as the weak side of a platoon. Instead, he’s been one of the best players in baseball for the first month of the season.

With seven homers, nearly as many walks as strikeouts, and a .364 BABIP, Dozier is riding a .337/.441/.663 slash line good for an American League-leading 189 wRC+. His 1.7 WAR is fifth in all of baseball behind only Cody Bellinger, Christian Yelich, Paul DeJong, and Mike Trout. This isn’t going to last. It can’t possibly last, but it is worth exploring how Dozier got here and the level he might settle in to once the magic wears off. Over at Royals Review on Tuesday, Shaun Newkirk discussed Dozier’s start and listed some reasons why he’s bound to slow down:

  • His BABIP is .371, far more north than his near league average BABIP of .296 last year. While good quality of contact can lead to better balls in play, .371 is probably a bit rich.

  • He isn’t a 194 wRC+ hitter. No one expects that number to continue as he’s not prime Miguel Cabrera, Mike Trout, or Barry Bonds.

  • The projection systems don’t necessarily buy it yet. They project him going forward (this includes what he has done in 2019 by the way) for a 93-97 wRC+.

  • He’s running a 20%+ HR/FB%, where the league average is more like 12-13%.

  • He’s at almost double the league average infield hit%, which isn’t a big part of his game to be fair.

    You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
    It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
    ✓Ad-free browsing
    ✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
    ✓Historical & platoon projections
    ✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
    ✓One-click data exports
    ✓Customizable player-page dashboards
    ✓Dark & Classic site modes
    ✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
    ✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
    ✓Optional homepage photo removal
    ✓Gift articles to non-Members
    ✓Full postseason coverage
  • He’s also yet to hit any any infield fly balls, whereas a typical batter hits ~10% of his batted balls on the infield

The focus of Newkirk’s piece isn’t on where Dozier’s numbers will eventually fall, but on the plate discipline that has helped his rise. Even a quick glance at the numbers shows how Dozier is different.

Hunter Dozier Plate Discipline
Season Team O-Swing% Z-Swing% Swing% O-Contact% Z-Contact% Contact% Zone%
2018 Royals 35.2 % 66.7 % 50.1 % 49.7 % 88.2 % 73.9 % 47.3 %
2019 Royals 23.2 % 55.0 % 38.3 % 46.9 % 93.3 % 78.4 % 47.3 %
Pitch f/x

The most important changes for Dozier have come outside the strike zone. He previously swung at 35% of pitches outside the strike zone; now he’s down to 23%. With the league average coming in at 29%, Dozier has moved from one extreme to the other. When he does swing, he’s still making contact under 50% of the time, which is below league average, while still making contact on pitches in the zone at an above-average rate. He’s still seeing the same number of pitches in the strike zone, but he has simply chosen not to swing at a lot of pitches, no matter where they are located. When asked about his newfound hitting philosophy by Sam Mellinger, Dozier gave a fairly simple, straightforward answer.

“Something I’m trying to be a little better at is really only swinging at good pitches,” Dozier said.

Dozier has always had tremendous raw power, with Eric Longenhagen putting a 65 on his raw power ahead of the 2018 season, though only an average 50 on his ability to get to that power in games. Even when he struggled last season, he did pretty well when he was able to make contact, putting up a .411 xwOBA on contact, which ranked 54th out of the 228 players with at least 250 batted balls. With an above-average 89.5 mph exit velocity and a middle of the pack 13 degree average launch angle, Dozier didn’t need help lifting the ball. He needed help making contact, and his new approach has been very successful.

Last season, Dozier saw more fourseam fastballs and sliders than any other pitches, and that has been true this year as well. He swung at 25% of fastballs outside the zone last season and had a 9% swinging strike rate on the pitch overall. This year, he’s swung at just 13% of fourseamers outside the zone, and his whiff rate on the pitch is down to 3%. But the more important gains for Dozier have come on the slider. The slider is a pitch that goes outside the strike zone around 60% of the time. Of those pitches out of the zone, Dozier swung at nearly half of them and made contact less than a third of the time, leading to an overall 23% whiff rate on all the sliders he saw last year. This season, he’s swinging at under 30% of sliders out of the zone and while he’s still whiffing a lot when he swings, the reduced swings have dropped his swinging strike rate on sliders by seven percentage points.

In terms of sustainability, Dozier has seen about 200 pitches outside the zone and swung at 23% of them. In looking at how reliable that number is, the 95% confidence interval for that rate and number of opportunities puts Dozier between 19% and 30%, a clear improvement over last season’s 35% chase rate. The way for Dozier to make more contact isn’t to shorten his swing, expand the zone, and try and make contact on tough pitches; it’s to try and ignore those tough pitches completely and focus on pitches where he can make good contact. In his piece on hitters this season, Eno Sarris talked to Adam Ottavino about how hitters are changing their approach and Ottavino said this:

“You’re seeing more of that Dodger-type approach: Get your A-swing off all three times but be really good at commanding the zone,” Adam Ottavino told me this week. “Selective, but powerfully selective. The old swing used to be to see the ball deep — so that you could take the fastball to the opposite field or catch the breaking ball out in front — but now people have now seen the Justin Turners of the world, where they are really selective, but when they get their pitch they’re ready to hit it early and out in front. If you get your A-swing off and it ends up being a bastard pitch, they’re okay with it because they’ll miss it and they’ll have another chance. Don’t put it into play weakly.”

My look at early season numbers indicates that more hitters do seem to be taking this approach by swinging at fewer pitches outside the zone resulting in more walks and more hard contact by swinging at pitches they can handle.

Hitters are swinging and missing on more pitches than they ever have before and that has meant strikeouts continue to rise, but they’ve stopped the bleeding when it comes to chasing offspeed pitches outside the zone as they see more and more of those pitches. The result has been more walks and more power, which has counteracted some of the gains pitchers have been making over the last few years.

Plate Discipline Revolution might not have the same cachet as Launch Angle Revolution–though it’s not like the latter exactly rolls off the tongue–but hitters can make huge advances by being more selective and taking big swings at pitches they can hit for power. We don’t yet know how this will play out for Dozier. He’s taking a lot more called strikes this year (21% of pitches) compared to last year (16%), and it is likely that approach will lead to more strikeouts. Dozier’s plate discipline numbers show he swings at few pitches generally and doesn’t make contact on pitches outside the zone. He doesn’t have a ton of close comps, but the closest might be Tommy Pham.

Like Dozier, Pham is fairly patient in and out of the zone, and when he swings at pitches off the plate, he doesn’t make a ton of contact. Also like Dozier, when Pham makes contact, he hits the ball hard. Pham has a career 12% walk rate and 25% strikeout rate with an ISO right around .200. If Dozier is going to keep his success going, that’s probably what it’s going to look like. Dozier isn’t going to keep this up at his current level, but his future looks far brighter than it did just one month ago.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
ShauncoreMember since 2019
7 years ago

Man that Newkirk guy is smart, handsome, and in great shape.

But Dozier has been a pleasant surprise for Royals fans, in a year where the lineup was looking particularly dreadful. I think he was semi-written off after he stumbled in AA/AAA and then again when he reached the majors initially. Seems like Dozier might not just end up being the guy the Royals took ahead of Sean Manaea to save some money to afford Manaea.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

You thought you could hide by putting on a jersey that said “Dozier” and a batting helmet, but no! You got caught.

Joey Butts
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Tu eres Moleculo!

Giolito's changeup
7 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Craig,

Thanks for the further intro to Hunter Dozier.

Shauncore, always liked your insightful comments.
Did not know you wrote for the KC Royals. Congrats.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
7 years ago

Thanks for the kind words. I’ll note I don’t write for the Royals, I write about them. I’m not employed by them and if I were they would have fired me already for being too critical of the way they’ve run their org the past few years.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

I’ve always been intrigued by Dozier, because guys with his power and who can fake third base don’t grow on trees. But then he struggled with faking third base, and he kept striking out, and the short side of a platoon at first base isn’t exactly something to write home about.

And now it not only looks like he’s figured things out at the plate, but he can also fake third base again. This is very good news for the Royals!

30 homer power and a patient approach with about 30% strikeout rates puts you in 2018 Justin Upton territory, and he was a 3-win player despite playing lower on the defensive spectrum (Dozier so far is an average defender at 3rd, which is what Upton was in left). That’s more than the Royals had any right to expect out of Dozier, and is a good reminder of why rebuilding teams should keep giving their Quad-A guys (and other team’s Quad-A guys!) a chance to succeed.

What's that Odor
7 years ago

Drop Eaton or Mazara for this guy?

Francis C.
7 years ago

I’d drop Mazara. Mazara still hitting too many grounders and not enough fly balls. Eaton at least has potential to steal bases.

StockMember since 2024
7 years ago

Dozier is better than both.

si.or.noMember since 2017
7 years ago

I was just thinking yesterday how it was mildly surprising that FG hadn’t written an article about Hunter Dozier.

Now I’m afraid that you’re reading my mind.

John Autin
7 years ago

Shucks, I thought this was gonna be about Roy Cullenbine, or maybe Indian Bob Johnson.

Joey Butts
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Ah, but see, you’ve heard of those guys.

LHPSU
7 years ago

His biggest obstacle to fame is his last name, because when you see the name “Dozier” in baseball you assume Brian, so no one has ever noticed Hunter’s existence.

Seriously, there were only three Doziers in the entire history of professional baseball before Brian came along, and they combined for a total of 17.1 innings pitched across Buzz and Tom, and 54 plate appearances in D.J. What are the chances?

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Brian was also a middling prospect who no one expected to do very much!

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

And currently he isn’t! (I made this comment because by me making it, it significantly increases Brian’s odds of winning the batting title).

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Hard to say what’s wrong with him – most of the underlying data haven’t changed much. The only thing I see is that he used to destroy fastballs, and last year and this year he isn’t. Here’s his fastball runs above average:

2013 6.7
2014 15.4
2015 10.4
2016 23.9
2017 23.0
2018 1.4
2019 -4.6

I don’t know how much that really means, but it fits the shape of his overall performance quite neatly.

John Autin
7 years ago

Sincere questions about current projection methods vis a vis Dozier’s hot start:

1) Have the batter projection methods become significantly more accurate in the past few years? — either preseason projections, or extrapolating from the first 30-ish games to a full season?

2) Are batter seasons more volatile in recent years? — I would suspect so, given the large rise in the share of batting value that is determined by HRs, juxtaposed with the large drop in batted balls.

I ask because, for most of sabermetric history, Dozier’s hot start would have been weighed strictly against his mediocre track record — .261 / .346 / .426 / .772 in over 2,000 PAs in the minors, with no promising markers in that line or his first 400 PAs in MLB — and pretty much dismissed as a fluke.

Now, though, we have so much more data, in many new flavors — not just countables, but more info on intentional changes. So, in a case like Dozier, we’re more likely to take his statement about trying to swing only at good pitches, see that it correlates with his countables, and conclude that his hot start just might be meaningful.

But has the new data really improved our interpretation of small samples? After all, it’s a game of constant adjustments. For example, Pete Alonso’s hot start seems to have convinced pitchers to swap out those knee-high fastballs in favor of offspeed stuff with the same first impression, and Alonso has yet to compensate.

So even if Dozier maintains his zone discipline, pitchers will seek out his next weakness. And one corollary of the data explosion is that news gets around much more quickly. Ultimately, his success will depend on a whole constellation of batting skills … which points back to his full professional record.

Dozier’s past K-BB% was 14.6%, in 2,600 PAs as a pro.
His best prior full year was 11.2%.
Last year alone, 19.6% across both levels, and 21.9% in the majors.
And suddenly, this year, just 3.5% in 115 PAs.
I’d be more inclined to buy into it if I knew of anyone who ever sustained such gains.

StockMember since 2024
7 years ago

Last year Dozier was at 7% in Barrells/PA. This year he is at 9.6%
Last year the exit velocity on LD/FB for Dozier was 93.7 mph. This year he sits at 97 MPH.
Last year balls came of Dozier’s bat at 95 MPH+ 40.2% of the time. This year it is 44.7% of the time

Needless to say he is a much improved hitter.

The last three seasons his Minor league BABIP has ranged from .340 -.390 and he has had only one year where his BABIP is less than .325. He rarely hits the ball soft. His 9.2% Soft hit % is tied for the 8th lowest among qualified batters. His Hard hit % ranks 28th. Of the 27 in front of him none hit it in the air more than him. And he has 0 IFFB. 19 of the 27 who have a higher hard hit % than him also have a higher HR/FB ratio. So his 18% is not unreasonable.

What he is doing is real.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Stock

Certainly what he’s done is real in the sense that it isn’t a mirage fueled by lucky BABIP singles.

I think the questions above regarding whether we have enough data to determine that he can maintain his new approach, or that pitchers can’t mitigate it as they get more data on how to attack him, are good ones. It’s still only 100ish plate appearances.

Kevbot034
7 years ago

I always liked Dozier. Was always based on nothing, just thought his name was cool lol. Glad the Royals let him play and I hope he’s legit to keep hitting and being passable defense