We Can’t Let Baseball’s Fun-Hating Dorks Kill the Stolen Base Again

As an inveterately unhappy middle-aged man, I don’t like pointing out when things get better. So when I say that the 2023 MLB rule changes massively improved baseball as a spectator experience, you can rest assured that I’m not making that assertion lightly.
You know what I’m talking about: The shift ban, the pitch clock, and the pizza box bases. Back in the olden days, a sufficiently daring and athletic ballplayer could rack up 50, 60, or even 100 steals in a season. But the response to that era has been a gradual tightening up of baserunning tactics.
First, the roided-up giants of the 1990s got too stiff and meaty to run and slide. Even those athletes who maintained their springiness didn’t want to run into an out when the guy at the plate could use his 25-inch forearms to drive them in from anywhere. In the 2000s, an army of Theo Epstein wannabes took over baseball operations en masse. These men, with their locust-like commitment to efficiency, discouraged risky baserunning behavior even further. While their Harvard MBA classmates were killing the American housing market, they killed the stolen base.
That was supposed to change with the 2023 rules. Pitchers could no longer throw to the bases with impunity. That, and the six-inch reduction in distance between the bags, was supposed to tip the scales ever so slightly in the baserunners’ favor. The change was meant to be subtle, even imperceptible to anyone who wasn’t actively looking at it, but just powerful enough to encourage more proactive baserunning:

It worked. Ronald Acuña Jr. is precisely the kind of player constrained by the conservative baserunning norms of the modern game. A great athlete and a plus runner, Acuña led the National League with 37 steals — a pitiful total — in his second season in the majors. But every time Acuña got caught, he took away a potential RBI from Freddie Freeman or Austin Riley or (later on) Matt Olson. And with every hard slide, he stressed his precious joints and muscles, risking an injury that’d keep his 40-homer bat out of the lineup.
In 2023, Acuña stole 73 bases on 87 attempts. It was the first 70-steal season in the big leagues since 2009, and the second-highest total of stolen base attempts in the 21st Century. Acuña was named NL MVP in a unanimous vote.
The next year, Shohei Ohtani, in what looked like a similar just-for-S’s-and-G’s experiment, swiped 59 bags. Guess how many MVP votes he got? Elly De La Cruz led the majors with 67 steals that year. In 2025, José Ramírez — he of one 30-steal campaign in 10 big league seasons before the new rules — logged his second straight 40-steal season. Bobby Witt Jr., who stole 49 bases in 2023, purloined another 38 in 2025.
The greatest stars in baseball are often great athletes as well, and for the first time in a generation, they weren’t afraid to put their legs to work. I was thrilled. Having 30-homer power didn’t stop Willie Mays, or Eric Davis, or even the young Barry Bonds from racking up dozens of steals per year. Why should Acuña or Ohtani or Witt be so constrained?
And it wasn’t just great athletes who ran a lot. Juan Soto and Josh Naylor both stole 30-plus bags in 2025, even though neither of them is fast enough to outrun a sea cucumber. A new day is dawning, comrades.
Or so I thought.
| Name | Team | G | PA | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasim Nuñez | WSN | 116 | 412 | 40 | 7 | .228 | .313 | .265 | 67 |
| Chandler Simpson | TBR | 117 | 473 | 35 | 12 | .310 | .337 | .367 | 97 |
| Bobby Witt Jr. | KCR | 108 | 476 | 33 | 6 | .287 | .361 | .460 | 127 |
| Jazz Chisholm Jr. | NYY | 116 | 455 | 32 | 7 | .214 | .292 | .384 | 89 |
| Pete Crow-Armstrong | CHC | 127 | 566 | 31 | 7 | .282 | .381 | .555 | 155 |
| José Caballero | NYY | 104 | 361 | 30 | 9 | .242 | .299 | .388 | 93 |
| José Ramírez | CLE | 93 | 402 | 29 | 3 | .241 | .344 | .388 | 106 |
| Esteury Ruiz | MIA | 82 | 175 | 29 | 6 | .257 | .376 | .465 | 134 |
| Fernando Tatis Jr. | SDP | 125 | 551 | 28 | 13 | .280 | .353 | .432 | 119 |
This is a top nine instead of a top 10 because there’s a five-way tie for 10th place and I didn’t want to overextend the table. It bears mentioning that Naylor, Jackson Merrill, and CJ Abrams are three of the five players involved in that tie. Witt and Ramírez are both still running a lot. So are the intractably pedal-to-the-metal Jazz Chisholm Jr. and Pete Crow-Armstrong.
But this leaderboard is mostly populated by specialists. Players who hang around the majors in the vain hope that someday they’ll be allowed to steal first base. Even Tatis isn’t really a power hitter anymore.
Maybe the superstar stolen base holiday was too wonderful to live long. After all, Acuña has been hurt basically since the moment he wrapped up that 73-steal campaign. Perhaps the time has come to return high-volume basestealing to the specialists, while the stars settle for 20 bags a year.
If you look at this season’s leaderboard, you’ll see that Nasim Nuñez is the only player with more than 35 stolen bases. Not to worry, I can hear you thinking. There’s plenty of season left.
Except… there isn’t actually that much season remaining anymore. Only five of these players are on pace to steal 40 or more bags. Nuñez is on pace for 51. If he goes a week or two without getting on base enough to make an attempt — which is not, like, inconceivable for a hitter like Nuñez — we could end up going without a 50-steal campaign for the first time since the rule change.
A season without a 50-steal player is an aberration in recent history. In the five seasons leading up to the rule change (four, really, if you account for 2020), nobody stole 50 bases in a season. For comparison, there were only four seasons without a 50-steal player between 1958 and 2017. In 2022, Jon Berti led the majors with 41 steals, which was the lowest league-leading total in a full season since 1963.
A thinning out at the top of the leaderboard doesn’t necessarily augur a return to station-to-station running, but let’s go back to that graph from earlier. Computer, enhance:

Look at that. The overall stolen base attempt rate is dropping. Perceptibly. So is the success rate, but basestealers are still converting at a much higher rate than at any point in pre-2023 baseball history. Apparently that’s not enough for the greedy lead-footed bastards who call the shots. The league-wide attempt rate has already fallen below where it was as recently as 2012.
It’s a disgrace. Everyone in MLB should be relieved that Rickey Henderson isn’t around to be disappointed by the state of his once-beautiful game. (What the heck, I’ll go watch Harold Reynolds tell his story about Rickey and the 1987 stolen base title again.)
I’m sure that sounds like an overreaction, but it’s easiest to treat a disease — physical or social — in its early stages. If we wait another decade to confront this problem, it might be too late.
I don’t want to enlarge the bases again, or further restrict pickoff moves. The 1980s were the golden age of basestealing, but the uppers and Astroturf that defined that era of baseball had, um, significant negative side effects. Bringing back greenies will probably cause more problems than it solves. Maybe we should hide a taser underneath first base. There is no greater motivation to action than the threat of random electrocution. I’m just thinking out loud here.
The stolen base is one of the most exciting plays in baseball; even the threat of it allows viewers to dream of (or fear, depending on one’s rooting interest) a big inning after just a single or a walk. We waited too long and sacrificed too much to get it back. I will not stand by and do nothing while it fades into disuse once more.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
Absolute BAR with the crack at MBAs, haha
Except that he should have used Yale, Theo Epstein and Craig Breslow instantly come to mind.
…neither of whom has an MBA at all?
I don’t know why Baumann says “this leaderboard is mostly populated by specialists.” I count four of the nine players as specialists (Nuñez, Simpson, Caballero, Ruiz). The other five (i.e. the majority of the list) have lengthy track records of other skills besides base-stealing.
Caballero has better offensive stats across the board than Jazz, including slugging. He has only 5 less HR in 60 fewer PA. If Caballero’s a specialist, so is Jazz.
Maybe Caballero is breaking out beyond being just a SB specialist, in which case only three would be specialists by my count.
Pirates homer comment here: The Pirates were doing their part but they had two stolen-base threats hit the 60-day IL with finger injuries. Oneil Cruz has 22 SB in 290 PA and Konnor Griffin has 20 in 247, which both were at least 45 SB/600 PA paces.
Fortunately Cruz already has swiped a bag in his second game back (in an obvious SB situation too, on first base with two outs in the eighth, trailing by 1 with a singles hitter at the plate).
And worth clarifying that neither hand injury came from base stealing.
It’s not just about beating the throw; there is the additional risk of being off the bag for a fraction of a second and being caught on replay. Maybe the standard should be: once you’re safe, you’re safe.
However, that is included in the success rate, right? Isn’t the break even point around 67%? It’s kind of weird that there isn’t more base stealing going on.
The “hover over the base” scenario is basically gone, and while overslides still happen, I feel reviews only happen when it appears that the runner is indeed out (he visibly loses contact and has to quickly get back on before the tag, which everyone in the ballpark sees).
One criticism: If we go to “if you’re safe, you’re safe,” then what happens when someone is egregiously off the base? Should there be a minimum threshold of distance off the base where a runner is no longer safe? I feel every proposal like this never addresses this.
I liked the “Andrelton Simmons” rule that once you touched the base, the area over the base is also safe. So you’d have to have your entire body outside that rectangular prism to be out. Seems the best compromise in the age of replay.
This is the simplest, best solution. While we are at it, can we also stop allowing fielders to block the base with their legs or push guys off with the ball in their gloves? I see them both very often and never see the fielder called.
Yeah, I think we need to change the rule on replay where if the runner touches the bag before the tag and is still touching the bag when his momentum stops, he is safe. If he overslides and comes off the bag when his momentum stops, he’s at risk of being tagged but essentially you should be safe from the moment you first touch the bag until your momentum stops, so popping off the bag momentarily won’t put you at risk of being tagged.
I would agree with this, especially on review. If it’s clear enough for the umpire to see in real time, I’m okay with an out being called.
I think you need to have a bodypart over the bag after the initial contact till the end of momentum to be safe, if you’re an inch above the bag, fine, if you lose contact because you’re to the right or left of the bag from trying to avoid the tag while in contact with the ball, out.
Can’t remember who proposed the “invisible prism extending upward from the bag” rule but I think it’s clearly the correct one.
Was it Dave Cameron? In these electronic pages?
How about:
You’re not allowed to challenge a runner being out on an overslide if he was called safe by the ump and initially reached the base before the tag.
People always complain about stealers being out because replay shows they were just off the base. But no one complains that replay shows a missed tag and the stealer is safe.
Tatis catching strays the day after hitting like 900ft of HRs
Especially since he was stealing like mad early in the season when his power was nowhere to be found. Now he’s doing both and it’s pretty great.
I would also support random electrocutions
I accidentally read this as “random electricians”
As a homeowner I tend to support random electricians as a necessity, not a gameplan
It is.
How about the fact that there are so many more home runs than there used to be?
That’s a good question.
Combined with BA’s being down, I wonder if there are just less runners on 1B than in years past?
How are SB attempts as a ratio of men on 1B?
I just did the math on this picking a handful of years. This is just basic math of SB att/(BB+HBP+Singles). I found a ratio of .118 for the early 80s, .115 in the early 90s. The 2012 peak before another drop off is .099. 2021 before the rule change was .068
This year so far is .096, so a lower rate per runner on 1B than 2012, but last year was .102
But, let me throw out 2 more years to demonstrate how the rate/G is affected by the mechanics of the game itself shifting towards sluggers. 1997 is that peak in the 90s after the “w” looking trough in rate. The rate per runner at 1B was .108. in 2024, the peak of players taking advantage of the new rules, it was .107
So yeah, players are stealing less but at numbers more comparable to the 90s and 2000s once we adjust for offensive environment.
Injury is causing stars to stop running. They started running more initially but they have decided it’s not worth the risk. Acuna may never reach 40 SBs again.
That can account for decreased attempts, but not success rate.
I think maybe teams have re-prioritized catcher throwing skills in the era of more stolen bases after de-prioritizing them during the previous 10 or 20 years.
I think you’re right, and I wonder if this shows up on statcast as an overall decrease in catcher pop times and/or an increase in arm strength. Quick and dirty, it seems like 2026 pop time average is lower than 2019, just based on sorting qualified catchers. But 2023 and 2026 are similar for pop time, so not exactly clear.
This would be my bet as well. Or focus on some other defensive tactic.
When the rules changed to encourage more steals, more stealers stole. Of course they did! And gradually defenses have adapted to bring both rates (attempts and successes) back downward.
There’s still a lot of room to attain an equilibrium above the pre-2023 numbers
Also I suspect the same coaching/study that lead to the crazy SB success rates of players like Ohtani and Soto is now being applied to pitchers to help them avoid those tells.
Whoo boy. I’d think this was satire, but it’s pretty clearly not.
I appreciate the audacity of making a snarky comment about “stressing his precious joints and muscles” when talking about Ronald Acuna Jr.
Basically every current player mentioned in the body of the article has missed significant time with injuries (a fair percentage being lower body injuries) in the last two seasons. Oh, and an obligatory Eric Davis mention — pretty unintentionally hilarious.
The choice to cut off the chart at 1980 is a pretty spectacular bit of cherry picking — right at the point where steal attempts jumped to basically their highest point in recorded baseball history. Right now (0.89 per team game), we’re basically at the halfway point between the lowest pre-rule change low (2021, 0.61) and the absolute height of the 25-year surge in stolen bases (1987, 1.21). This freakout is over a 0.05/team game change from 2024 — one stolen base attempt per 10 games.
I’m with you, and the jump in swipes with a slight correction seems like a predictable outcome of defense adjusting to an offensive change. There will be more young guys that come into the league who will swipe bases ruthlessly, while the aged thieves reduce their attempts to save their bodies. That’s just the nature of the baseball–thievery is mostly a young man’s game.
I did not take the “precious joints and muscles” comment to be snarky? The point was that Acuña risked injury stealing bases, and that as he says toward the end of the article, it’s bad for him (and the game) that he’s missed so much time since his 73-SB season. Which means it may be inevitable that the best hitters will dial back their stolen bases, but it is a shame. Hence the solutions at the end being comically unreasonable, like the Taser at first base.
While their Harvard MBA classmates killed the housing market, these execs killed the stolen base.
Philosophers and ethicists will debate for centuries which was the greater evil. As a professional in my 40s who still rents, I’m leaning toward having a bigger issue with the killing of the stolen base.
A professional what?
In his 40s
The solution is to make the bases bigger. Maybe go from small pizza size to extra large. In fact, put pizza in the bases so the runner is more motivated and/or the fielder is distracted by the smell of pepperoni.
pinch runner Bartolo Colon
Hey, that guy has a 4.32 40-time!
(4.32 minutes)
You would think a game that has been around for 150 years would have figured out every situation by now but, low and behold, teams just recently found out that the most effective throw to 2nd isn’t at the base but some distance to the right side of the base. This has negated some of the advantages that fewer pick off attempts and larger bases added.
Is there a good way on FanGraphs to see SB or CS as an outcome according to pitch count? Something like the new tool in labs?
Purloined
I’m stretching the rules already, but I’m going to count this as a feature for Nasim Nunez since he’s both in the accompanying photo and the “In this article” section, which improves his RTI to an amazing 1.18!
Can we get attempts and success rates after two pick-off attempts? It seems whenever I’m watching, after two pickoff attempts the runner never goes, despite me yelling loudly at the TV screen “go you dummy it’s a FREE BASE JUST TAKE IT WHY DON’T YOU RUN AAARGH?!”
So yeah, more steals please.
So I can’t find league wide rates, but Savant’s baserunning leaderboards let you filter by number of prior disengagements — though it’s not laid out in a particularly useful way.
This is not a free base! There is nothing to prevent the pitcher from throwing over a third time and if the runner extends his lead too far he gets picked off. Of course there is risk of a balk but it isn’t as easy to steal as you make it appear. I am certain the teams have made an extensive study of this situation.
not all of them
I like that the two charts feature stolen base success rates going up as high as 125% on the y-axis. Someday…
Nasim Nunez actually is above average at getting on base. 10% walk rate helps a lot. His wRC is mostly a complete lack of xtra base power. .276 slugging percentage. That is his only weakness as a player. Admittedly a fairly big weakness.
His hitting leaves a lot to be desired in addition to his lack of power. The number that jumps off his stat line to me is 4, count’em four, doubles in 416 PA’s. I would think he would pop enough bloopers down the lines and, with his speed, far exceed that. I don’t know if it is possible but if a hitting coach could get him to punch the ball around, and get his K-rate down, his speed would enable him to up that number considerably.
4 doubles is a lack of power. I believe all 4 were infield singles he turned into doubles. He has one homer. That was real. But every other aspect is above average. He walks more than most. Strikes out less than most. Plays excellent jaw dropping defense. Leads the league in steals. Rarely gets caught. Takes extra bases on other players hits and outs as elite. Plus, Ben called him the best bunter in baseball a few months back.
His biggest issue is probably that he is a tiny adult human. Barely over 5 foot by my observation.
I am not disagreeing that Nunez completely lacks power. In fact how did he ever reach the seats but I did some rudimentary research and found only one qualified hitter over the past 10 full seasons who didn’t reach double figure in doubles. That was Trent Grisham, a power hitter, in 2025 with 9 but he hit an amazing 34 HR’s. A printout isn’t needed to know that almost every time he hit the ball hard he elevated it.
He’s not above average. His .308 OBP this year is 10 points below the league average of .318.
Watching that clip of Harold Reynolds tell the story…man, Nick Swisher is a clown.
Just openly deaden the ball and this’ll fix itself. Not, like, pre-WW1 level dead. Just way more dead than now.
But chicks dig the long ball…
I suppose women weren’t allowed to watch baseball back in the actual dead-ball era, so you might be on to something there.
I’d much prefer larger outfields
“greedy lead-footed bastards” is a wonderful phrase!