With His Hot Start, Bryan Reynolds May Be Hitting His Way Out of Pittsburgh

Bryan Reynolds
Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

Oneil Cruz’s fractured fibula is the biggest story surrounding the Pirates. On the positive side, the return of Andrew McCutchen to the fold is neat, and Tuesday night’s walk-off home run by Ji Hwan Bae was pretty cool. To these eyes, however, the most noteworthy thing about Pittsburgh thus far — even beyond the fact that the team’s 7–4 start is its best since 2018 — has been the torrid play of Bryan Reynolds. The 28-year-old outfielder has been the one of the game’s hottest hitters, and he’s done it as progress toward a contract extension has ground to a halt just when it seemed that a deal to keep him in black and gold was within reach.

Reynolds ended last weekend as one of seven players who had collected hits in every game this season (José Abreu, José Ramírez, Nolan Arenado, Randy Arozarena, Bryson Stott, and Jordan Walker were the others). He and Abreu both went hitless in Monday night’s Pirates-Astros contest, and by the close of play Tuesday, only the streaks of Stott and Walker remained intact. Still, season-opening hitting streaks come and go pretty quickly; of more interest is that Reynolds has been putting up eye-opening numbers. Through Tuesday, he’s hitting .356/.367/.778, leading the NL in slugging percentage and homers (five) and ranking fifth in WAR (0.7) and wRC+ (184). Mind you, those numbers looked even more impressive before his 1-for-8 on Monday and Tuesday nights, but the sudden itch to write about Adam Duvall, an even hotter hitter in this young season, going down with a wrist injury got in my way.

For Duvall, Reynolds, and everyone else, we’re still in Small Sample Theater territory, but as with the Red Sox slugger, some underlying numbers have me wondering if we’re seeing real improvements to his game. For starters, like Duvall, he’s cut his strikeout rate dramatically: Last year he struck out 23% of the time, and for his career he’s at 21.5%, but this year, that’s down to 10.2%. Given that strikeout rates stabilize around 60 PA and that Reynolds is at 49, this could wind up being noteworthy, though unlike Duvall, his swinging-strike rate hasn’t fallen quite so dramatically, going from 12.9% last year to 11.9% this year. His 31.1% chase rate is down 4.5 points from last year, when he tried to hack his way out of a slow start, and is just half a point lower than his career mark, but even so, he’s walking in just 4.1% of his plate appearances, less than half of his 9.7% career mark.

All of this translates to more contact than usual for Reynolds, and he’s making the most of it. Seriously: He’s hitting the ball in the air much more than ever, and his average exit velocity, barrel rate, and hard-hit rate are beyond anything in the Bryan Reynolds catalogue.

Bryan Reynolds Batted Ball Profile
Season BBE GB/FB GB% FB% EV LA Barrel% HardHit%
2019 373 1.56 46.4% 29.8% 89.5 9.4 6.7% 41.0%
2020 129 1.27 43.8% 34.4% 87.5 10.2 10.1% 38.0%
2021 444 1.10 38.9% 35.5% 89.4 13.4 10.4% 40.8%
2022 403 1.24 43.2% 34.7% 90.2 12.0 7.9% 42.9%
2023 42 0.70 33.3% 47.6% 92.0 18.3 28.6% 50.0%

Again, we’re not yet at the point of these stats stabilizing; via Baseball Prospectus’ Russell Carleton (whom I command you to read), exit velocity stabilizes around 40 batted ball events and barrel rate at 50 BBE, and groundball, fly ball, and hard-hit rates do so at 80 BBE. But even if Reynolds, who leads the majors with 12 barrels, didn’t add another one over his next eight batted balls, his 24% barrel rate would be higher than every qualified 2022 hitter other than Aaron Judge. As it is, his 28.6% barrel rate is fifth among current qualifiers, and his .896 xSLG and .553 xwOBA both lead the majors:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
xSLG Leaders
Player Team BBE EV Barrel% HardHit% AVG xBA SLG xSLG wOBA xwOBA
Bryan Reynolds PIT 42 92.0 28.6% 50.0% .356 .390 .778 .896 .464 .553
Matt Chapman TOR 34 99.4 32.4% 73.5% .477 .411 .841 .847 .573 .546
Adam Duvall BOS 28 88.9 25.0% 46.4% .455 .366 1.030 .842 .628 .527
Brandon Lowe TBR 20 91.0 35.0% 50.0% .321 .341 .786 .827 .515 .542
Giancarlo Stanton NYY 31 95.2 19.4% 54.8% .278 .337 .583 .748 .380 .467
Joc Pederson SFG 21 97.1 23.8% 61.9% .242 .280 .545 .723 .376 .448
C.J. Cron COL 29 93.2 24.1% 51.7% .250 .316 .600 .706 .370 .442
MJ Melendez KCR 20 97.7 30.0% 70.0% .162 .266 .297 .705 .266 .441
Rafael Devers BOS 33 95.3 18.2% 57.6% .283 .330 .609 .705 .388 .441
Freddie Freeman LAD 40 91.6 7.5% 42.5% .375 .441 .521 .699 .429 .518
Paul Goldschmidt STL 34 94.5 11.8% 52.9% .350 .366 .475 .693 .429 .501
James Outman LAD 21 90.4 23.8% 42.9% .273 .297 .727 .693 .478 .483
Vladimir Guerrero Jr. TOR 43 94.6 14.0% 58.1% .400 .399 .556 .691 .447 .496
Bo Bichette TOR 44 92.6 13.6% 45.5% .353 .423 .627 .689 .434 .490
Mike Trout LAA 28 96.0 14.3% 60.7% .282 .329 .564 .685 .440 .491
Yellow = major league leader.

Here’s where Reynolds is in terms of rolling xSLG:

The question underlying all of this is whether Reynolds’ hot start is a demonstration that he can get back to approximating his 2021 form, when he hit .302/.390/.522 for a 141 wRC+ and was worth 6.2 WAR, or whether last year’s good-not-great .262/.345/.461 (125 wRC+) and 2.8 WAR is the new norm. That question obviously has ramifications when it comes to his future, whether it’s in Pittsburgh or elsewhere.

Recall that in December, Reynolds, who has two remaining years of club control after this season, requested a trade after the Pirates reportedly offered him a six-year, $80 million extension, over $50 million short of the eight-year, $134 million deal he was seeking. Dan Szymborski recapped all of that in February and provided a six-year ZiPS projection for 2024–29: $95 million, a figure weighed down by Reynolds’ three remaining arbitration years (including this one), the fact that he’ll be heading into his age-31 season as a free agent, and his subpar defensive metrics (he had -14 DRS, -6 RAA, and -2.7 UZR as a center fielder last year). Dan also noted that limiting the defensive input to RAA as a center fielder added another $25 million to his projected value over that span, pushing his valuation into the ballpark of what Reynolds sought.

Just before the regular season began, the two sides drew closer to an eight-year, $106.75 million deal — that was including his $6.75 million salaries for 2023 and ’24 — but hit a snag over Reynolds’ desire for an opt-out clause after the fourth year (2026), meaning that the Pirates would gain only one more year of control if he were to exercise that option. With the soft deadline of Opening Day now having passed, that’s as far the conversation has gone. “Nothing to report… If there’s anything more to talk about, we’ll keep that between him and us.” said general manager Ben Cherington on Wednesday when asked if talks had progressed or broken off.

Reynolds is tearing the cover off the ball and also playing left field about twice as often as center (65 innings in the former, 32 in the latter so far). His ZiPS rest-of-season projection for 3.5 WAR would put him at a total of 4.2, a little below the halfway point between his last two seasons but closer to All-Star caliber, that while playing for just $6.75 million. Here’s a look at his preseason ZiPS percentile projection, based on 622 PA:

ZiPS Projection Percentiles – Bryan Reynolds
Percentile 2B HR BA OBP SLG OPS+ WAR
95% 40 35 .327 .404 .569 163 6.5
90% 37 31 .309 .392 .553 156 5.9
80% 34 29 .299 .378 .525 145 5.2
70% 31 27 .289 .368 .501 137 4.6
60% 29 24 .281 .362 .481 131 4.0
50% 28 23 .272 .354 .466 124 3.5
40% 26 21 .265 .345 .454 120 3.2
30% 25 20 .257 .337 .439 114 2.8
20% 23 18 .248 .327 .421 106 2.1
10% 20 15 .236 .312 .399 97 1.5
5% 19 13 .222 .303 .380 91 0.9

Given the boost of his hot start, Reynolds could be headed toward something between his 60th and 70th percentiles; my back-of-the-envelope math puts him at a 137 wRC+ including his rest-of-season ZiPS. Landing somewhere in there would obviously make for a rosier long-term projection.

All of which is to say that both Reynolds’ stock and his price tag are currently on the rise thanks to this hot start, and while there are certainly teams out there eager to meet his long-term financial desires, the Pirates’ willingness to get to his level is in question; their track record in such matters is certainly worthy of skepticism even given how close the two sides appear to be. If this current opportunity passes without a deal coming together, Reynolds may well be hitting himself out of Pittsburgh, just at a time the team is showing signs of life.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JayGray007Member since 2024
3 years ago

Honestly, even before the hot start, the best play was probably to simply take him thru ARB thru 2025, and offer a QO before 2026. He’d either take the QO or he’d decline it and theyd get a pick and also be able to spend that money elsewhere.

Either 2.9 seasons remaining + a comp pick, or 3.9 seasons remaining.

That’s a lot of time.

the only thing that would make that direction dumb or bad would be 1) a 2024 where the team is still not trying to win, ie, if that was the plan they shouldve traded him months or years ago, or 2) if he becomes a clubhouse cancer and throws a fit about not being under contract and isnt happy with arbitration.

i dont think the type of guy to become a clubhouse cancer over this.

The only way that “simply keeping reynolds thru his arbitration years and then offering a qualifying offer for 2026” is likely to be a bad option is that if the team is bad again in 24. If that happens, then shame on them.

JayGray007Member since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  JayGray007

In short, i think this article views the issue as a binary “either extend him or trade him”. Good players are kept thru arbitration and are offered qualifying offers all the time.

and finally, if the plan is to be bad in 2024, then i think there’s probably an argument to be made that they should trade him whether they find contractual common ground or not.

Last edited 3 years ago by JayGray007
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  JayGray007

It’s hard to imagine trading him while the Pirates have a winning record, and it probably doesn’t make sense to extend him right now while he’s on a 2015-Bryce-Harper-like hot streak. So for now, I think your analysis is correct.

But it’s not hard to imagine the Pirates falling apart while Reynolds still has a lot of trade value. The Pirates pythagorean and BaseRuns record has them at 5-6, and that’s with Andrew McCutcheon turning back the clock to 2014, Connor Joe playing impossibly well, and Oneil Cruz providing solid value and giving some hope for a breakout before getting hurt. Depth Charts projects them to finish 68-83 despite the solid start. It’s not hard to see how–if Reynolds starts hitting at a 140 wRC+ clip tomorrow and forevermore (which is the hypothetical the idea of trading him comes from)–the team might be better off trading him.

But that’s more likely a problem for the future version of Ben Cherington instead of a problem he has to deal with now.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Seems a little early to fall on Pythag and Base Runs when it’s (checks watch) 11 games into the season.

I’m with Jaygray, I’m fine with just riding it out with Reynolds contract wise. This season was likely going to be a transition type year where they look for some internal improvement from guys like Cruz, Keller, Hayes (lift the ball, buddy) and other intriguing players like Bae, Castro, etc.

The idea of constantly trading productive players and hoping to time everything (prospects coming up and performing, developmental wins) just right is a needle too fine to thread. At some point, they gotta make a stand and try to win.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

I mean, this is a team that has played at a .500 level and gotten some lucky breaks to steal an extra win or two. At some point, yes, you have to make a stand. That time may even be now. But if they are 10-15 games under .500 at the all star break, then that’s a different situation than the one the Pirates are in now.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sure, they have been fortunate so far. But putting 12 games under a microscope misses the bigger picture.

But I think this year was looked at as a transitional year where they’d move into the 70 win range, and if they end up at that point (which is still 20 under .500), they reset the clock even further if they trade him.

I’ve already got serious doubts about this FO and their ability to develop young players with any kind of extended success. So I’m hoping he doesn’t get traded unless they’re getting bowled over with some offer

JayGray007Member since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

i have little doubt that the cutthroat ideal path here would be to trade him today, and then go balls out in 2024. Youd have prospects from the trade coming up and helping you win, as well as the ability to re-spend the reynolds money and also outright increase payroll.

but, the next best option is probably to just keep him and then also go balls out trying to win with him in 24

the worst, by far, option for me would be to keep him and then choose suck in 2024 anyway

Last edited 3 years ago by JayGray007
EasyenoughMember since 2016
3 years ago

I wonder what the comp is for trading 2.5 years of Reynolds’s services at his peak. It’s like 1 WAR less than Soto though mainly because Soto’s peak probably wasn’t captured in the trade (projected for later) and Reynold’s peak almost certainly will be.

Soto warned that he wasn’t interested in an extension and Reynolds is demanding one. If Reynolds settles around his 70% projection, seems like it would require an immense haul to pry him loose. And even more if pirates are near .500.

apiratefan
3 years ago

Fangraphs writers told me Bryan Reynolds was definitely going to be traded before the 2022 season. Then he would almost certainly be moved before the 2022 deadline. Then they were very sure he’d be traded before the 2023 season.

Now he is on his way out of Pittsburgh

Love Fangraphs for their data driven insights and projections. Sometimes I wish they would stick to that rather than weighing in on player movement with any degree of confidence when they are equally as in the dark as the rest of us

Greg SimonsMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  apiratefan

Which FanGraphs writers said he was “definitely going to be traded before the 2022 season?”

Cave Dameron
3 years ago
Reply to  Greg Simons

Me

airforce21oneMember since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  Greg Simons

I don’t remember those exact words, but I feel like there have been a few fangraphs articles now basically saying “Bryan Reynolds isn’t really THAT great”. Probably right around the time they left him off the Top 50 trade value list.

Last edited 3 years ago by airforce21one
section144
3 years ago
Reply to  apiratefan

It’s called *clickbait*

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I don’t know what the Pirates were asking for before, but the Rangers are currently sitting in first place despite Ezequiel Duran and Robbie Grossman being totally unplayable. You have to imagine that even if the Rangers have no regrets that they’re at least thinking about what their outfield would look like with him in it.

carterMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And they just lost their arguably best hitter

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

What are they looking at as a return for Reynolds? A 50 arm and 50 bat or something near that? Maybe a 55 arm? I’m admittedly terrible at figuring trade values but that seems in the same ballpark.

I don’t really believe that their ask was “Soto-esque” because that came repeatedly from Jon Heyman. He parrots whatever the Yankees want him to say.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

My understanding was that they were particularly interested in pitching. The names I heard were Ricky Tiedemann and Bobby Miller, so probably a FV55 arm (by Eric’s grades, at least) was the initial ask as the headliner. For the Rangers, that would mean Owen White. But the Blue Jays got Varsho and the Dodgers basically decided they would replace from within, so I don’t exactly see either one as being interested in him right now. I am not sure if two 50’s (at least one being a pitcher) could replace a 55 arm in the deal, but I’m a bit skeptical that Jack Leiter is being evaluated as an FV50 right now so it may be moot.

Beyond that, I’m not sure what other pieces would be involved, or who beyond the Rangers would be looking for help with a switch-hitting, tweener outfielder with a well-rounded offensive profile.

For the secondary players in the deal, it depends on the valuation of Reynolds going forward. Let’s say an FV55 player is worth about $40M in surplus value. If you think he’ll give you, IDK, 12 WAR worth of value and he’ll cost $35M in arbitration (I’m really bad at guessing arbitration numbers), then you still have another $30M-$35M in surplus value left. So maybe 2 or 3 FV45 or 45+ type players, and a couple of FV40+ type players?

In terms of other teams, maybe the Braves, but they don’t have any prospects left; maybe the Marlins, but they’re not giving up Eury Perez; maybe the Yankees, but they don’t have any pitching prospects and I think they believe in Oswaldo Cabrera. Hard to find other teams that would be motivated to give up a haul right now.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Right I remember the pitching being their primary target.

My math was going with roughly 4.3 WAR for three years ending up with $103M and then minus the arb numbers (I think you’re pretty dead on with $35M; he’s making 6.75 this year, so I’d guess about $30M total his last two years is right). So I think we’re pretty much in the same place.

And I agree with you on the Rangers here. Leiter in for White amid other pieces probably doesn’t get it done, no matter the secondary pieces. Then you end up trying to make five nickels into a quarter which is fairly tough to do.

White/Carter probably gets you most of the way there. Maybe Bratt or Roby or someone in that area as the final piece.

Other teams? Braces are out of prospects. Marlins, ain’t dealing Eury, but they’ve also got a slew of other controllable arms. The Mets are plum out of any arms at the prospect level.

They don’t operate like this but…Tampa with a deal built around Bradley?

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
3 years ago

Never forget when he was left off the 2021 trade value top 50 & honorable mentions list!

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago

Batted-ball numbers may “stabilize” relatively quickly in some theoretical world, but the opposition obviously matters! Reynolds has faced relatively few good pitchers in his first 11 games due to the pure randomness of the schedule, and even then his torrid start is largely due to absolutely owning an even smaller handful of fringey-to-decent pitchers. I feel safe presuming that the teams considering a midseason trade for him are also aware of this.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

It’s hard to say whether Nick Pivetta and Lucas Giolito are bad pitchers now or whether they mostly look bad because they caught Bryan Reynolds on a good day. Kutter Crawford, though, you don’t get to face anyone like him in the playoffs and not so frequently in the regular season either.

Dan B
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Kutter Crawford is a 70 Grade fake baseball name.
Kutter Krawford would be an 80.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  Dan B

His cousin, Gutter Crawford, is a sinker baller.

raregokusMember since 2022
3 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Can’t bowl to save his life though.

hebrewMember since 2016
3 years ago

Ronny Mauricio, Mark Vientos and Alex Ramirez from the Mets for Reynolds, sign him for 5/$100 and stick him in LF

Who says no?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

The Pirates definitely say no. And probably Reynolds too, although I imagine the Mets would be fine going higher.

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, Mets have some good prospects but they’re all position players mostly. Although value is value so if that’s what it takes maybe something around Baty. If the Bucs can’t find a deal they want for high end arms, then go with the best deal around position players.

hebrewMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  gettwobrute79

Baty’s gonna be starting in the majors before May 1 i’m not sure they can afford to give him up

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

If the Mets season hinges on Brett Baty, they’re in deeper trouble than everyone realized.

hebrewMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

if he’s agreed to 6/105 and they’re only arguing over an opt-out, i’m not sure why Reynolds would be against 5/100

but the Pirates probably would want more you’re right

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

Both teams, the player, and also me.

hebrewMember since 2016
3 years ago

i have a very hard time seeing the mets say no to that deal

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

Sure, because it’s obviously a huge underpay for Reynolds. I’m just kidding about that part.

But bigger picture — maybe you don’t buy it, but Steve Cohen is constantly talking about this current spending binge being a “bridge” to playing more of the org’s younger talent as it becomes ready. Trading away a passel of MLB-ready young hitters to get one guy back who doesn’t even fill a clear short-term need does not seem to fit that strategic plan to me. But yes, you would obviously throw out the strategic plan if this lopsided a trade actually became available.

hebrewMember since 2016
3 years ago

Mauricio and Vientos are hard blocked and have literally nowhere to play on this Mets team and Alex Ramirez’s spot would be taken by Reynolds

And I don’t think 3 top prospects is as lopsided as you want it to be. Reynolds isn’t Juan Soto

gettwobrute79Member since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  hebrew

Reynolds is not Juan Soto, but if your selling point is “these Mets prospects are blocked,” that ain’t a selling point at all for the Bucs. Vientos can’t field, and neither he or Mauricio have a decent enough approach.

Calling them top prospects is overly generous.

Last edited 3 years ago by gettwobrute79
NATS FanMember since 2018
3 years ago

The Marlins should offer Sixto Sanchez and Jesus Sanchez. Then make the offer he asked for but add an additional year. Then stick him in left and lead him off every game for the next few seasons.

JayGray007Member since 2024
3 years ago

What is a fair Reynolds trade at this point? Is Owen White + Evan Carter, or something, too much? too little?

Just thinking about if a 2024 team with those two instead of Reynolds, and, in theory, a 100 Million payroll, and if it would be valid.

With No reynolds and no new spending, i believe the pirates payroll would be under 40 million. i think it’d be around 30, but let’s just say 40.

they could probably add, idk, Julio Urias, Blake snell, and lets say rhys hoskins if they wanted to, and still be under 100 million.

Lineup – Swaggerty Carter Suwinski, Hayes Cruz Bae Hoskins Davis Endy. (and Crews on the way :P)

Rotation – Urias, Snell, Keller, and then Roansy, White, Priester, Oviedo, etc battling for 4/5.

looks pretty good to me.

Last edited 3 years ago by JayGray007
airforce21oneMember since 2026
3 years ago
Reply to  JayGray007

Looks like a 75 win team to me.

NATS FanMember since 2018
3 years ago
Reply to  JayGray007

Depends on how several of those names develop. Swaggerty and. Suwinski are the first two that stick out with quite a bit of development to just be considered average. But in either case it’s possible.