2024 Mock Draft 1.0

Clubs have begun their pre-draft meetings, with some teams already about a week into theirs, while the last team to start them (Milwaukee, as far as I know) begins today. The number of people in draft meetings varies significantly from team to team. Some have more than 20 people in the room, others five or so. When any one person in the draft room learns something new, whether it’s from a scout buddy with another team or during a conversation with an agent or media person, the other folks in the room tend to also learn that thing. It is during this window that the dope starts to flow in a way that makes a more specific, full-round mock draft more feasible.
Below are notes I’ve compiled across the last couple of days from conversations with scouts, front office people, and agents. There isn’t intel on every single team or first round player out there in the ether right now. In spots where I’m making an educated guess based on a player’s fit with past team or decision-maker behavior, I try to make it obvious that’s what I’m doing. I let you know when rumors are coming from industry sources, while being vague enough to not burn a source. I also have some thoughts peppered in that aren’t specific to teams’ picks, but instead what the arc of the first round of this draft might look like based on the nature of this year’s class. For more info on the players below, head over to The Board for scouting reports, tool grades, and rankings.
1. Cleveland Guardians
Pick: Travis Bazzana, 2B, Oregon State
There hasn’t been any industry buzz about the Guardians trying like hell to cut an under-slot deal up here as a way of maximizing what they can do at picks 36, 48, and beyond. The draft doesn’t have the depth to make that strategy very enticing. Instead, this seems to be about who Cleveland considers to be the best player. Since the Combine, word of mouth has surrounded Travis Bazzana, and either Charlie Condon, JJ Wetherholt, or both. There are folks who think the telegraphed interest in Wetherholt is a smokescreen, and those who believe that Condon’s more volatile hit tool isn’t a fit with Cleveland’s typical modus operandi, but nobody ever excludes Bazzana from their mix, which I think is telling. There are those who think that once Guardians people got around Bazzana, his makeup pushed the thing over the finish line.
I don’t think the Wetherholt buzz is a smokescreen. Remember that Cleveland, perhaps more than any other club, cares about a player’s underclass performance. If a guy has a great sophomore year, hits on the Cape, and then has a tough pre-draft spring, the Guards are more likely to stay on him and take him if he falls. That applies to the Chase DeLauter, Shane Bieber, Tanner Bibee, and Ethan Hankins picks. Wetherholt was my top player in the class coming into the spring. He had a hamstring injury this year and didn’t slug like he did as a sophomore when he returned. He’s a better defender than Bazzana by a not small amount. If you think his injury had a meaningful impact on his offensive output as I do (Wetherholt’s underlying data is barely worse than Condon’s and Bazzana’s), then he might just be the best guy.
What we don’t and can’t know is what the Guardians think of Condon’s defense. If they think he can play center field, then I’m more inclined to believe they’d draft him. If they think he’s a corner infielder, then I’m more inclined to believe there’s too much chase and strikeout risk for them to take him. The same applies to Jac Caglianone, though if you told me the Guardians decided that the power upside of either of those guys was worth the risk, it would strike me as out of character for the org but not crazy from a talent standpoint.
2. Cincinnati Reds
Pick: Charlie Condon, 3B/CF/1B, Georgia
I haven’t spoken with anyone who has suggested the Reds would pass on Condon if he’s here. If Condon goes first, folks with teams have mentioned Cincinnati pivoting to either Chase Burns or Jac Caglianone.
3. Colorado Rockies
Pick: Chase Burns, RHP, Wake Forest
Aside from some mention of Jac Caglianone, folks are mostly putting the Rockies on college pitching here, with some specifically mentioning Burns but none singling out Hagen Smith. People with other clubs think Bill Schmidt might not have the luxury of waiting very long for this pick to reach Coors, and that that will influence what they do with this pick.
4. Oakland Athletics
Pick: Braden Montgomery, RF, Texas A&M
This is where there starts to be more variability. I think the dream scenario for Oakland is for Condon or Wetherholt to go first, then for Cags and Burns to go two and three in some order, leaving Bazzana for the taking at pick four. I think they’d prefer Bazzana to Wetherholt if both were available here. Nick Kurtz has been mentioned, though I have other people telling me he’s falling. But the most frequent industry chatter has Braden Montgomery with Oakland. If there’s a trend in Oakland’s early selections, it’s less about a type of player they’re into and seemingly more about location, with a preference for guys in the Southwest or on the West Coast (Jacob Wilson, Max Muncy, Daniel Susac, Henry Bolte, Cole Miller, Denzel Clarke). Montgomery spent two years at Stanford and one at A&M.
5. Chicago White Sox
Pick: Jac Caglianone, 1B/RF, Florida
I don’t have much team-specific dope about the White Sox aside from some chatter that they’ve entertained the idea of an under-slot deal with Konnor Griffin. In this scenario, Caglianone is here and presents franchise-altering upside for an org that could really use it. The optics of taking maybe the most famous guy in the draft when it’s also justifiable based on his talent might quell some of the angst around the ugliness of their rebuild.
6. Kansas City Royals
Pick: Hagen Smith, LHP, Arkansas
Perhaps the most consistent rumor I’ve heard is that Kansas City likes Smith and high school shortstop Bryce Rainer.
7. St. Louis Cardinals
Pick: Bryce Rainer, SS, Harvard Westlake (CA)
In this scenario, JJ Wetherholt is just sitting there, which might be too tempting for the Cardinals to pass up. Names people have put with St. Louis include Nick Kurtz, Chase Burns (does he have a home between pick no. 3 and here?), and Rainer. Recall that Masyn Winn was also a two-way prospect with a huge arm and that has worked out. I don’t think Konnor Griffin is in play here at all.
8. Los Angeles Angels
Pick: JJ Wetherholt, 2B, West Virginia
I watched Wetherholt go into the Angels’ suite for a meeting at the Combine and I don’t think you take that meeting if you’re Wetherholt unless there’s a chance you’re going to fall this far. This would fit the Angels’ express lane tendencies, as Wetherholt is pretty likely to move fast. Pick eight is also the first place where Cam Caminiti’s name has been mentioned, but you’d better really, really like the high school pitcher you’re taking over the hitters still available here.
9. Pittsburgh Pirates
Pick: Nick Kurtz, 1B, Wake Forest
Rival clubs have the Pirates on college hitting here because we’re getting to the point where the current regime has to start winning, and they need to improve the lineup around all of their young pitching. Cam Smith would be good value here, but he needs a swing change to get to his power and the Pirates haven’t been able to help Ke’Bryan Hayes do that. My sources have specifically mentioned Kurtz with Pittsburgh. He’d be a clean, quick-moving fit given their big league needs and his power is already actualized.
10. Washington Nationals
Pick: Konnor Griffin, OF, Jackson Prep (MS)
If we’re picking potential landing spots for Griffin, a toolsy high schooler with strikeout risk, it’s the team that recently drafted Elijah Green and Brady House. But Washington has a new scouting director (Danny Haas, formerly of the Diamondbacks), so this might depend on whether Haas or Mike Rizzo is making the pick.
This next area of the draft is where there’s generally considered to be a talent drop-off. Teams that pick in the early part of a new talent tier have more incentive to cut an under-slot deal or find sanctuary in a safer college player. In this draft, that’s going to be college hitters. I want to point out that several of the next half dozen teams are ones that tend to care a lot about contact skills. Because Tennessee second baseman Christian Moore didn’t perform especially well in that regard, he may be a candidate to slide deeper than teams expect.
11. Detroit Tigers
Pick: Ryan Waldschmidt, OF, Kentucky
Konnor Griffin and Cam Caminiti have been mentioned here, and there are four-corners area scouts who think Detroit is the favorite to take the latter. Aside from Jackson Jobe, the Tigers have tended to take college hitters who’ve performed at Power Five Conferences. As teams have gathered for meetings, Waldschmidt is the name that keeps coming up as one of a handful of players who seem poised to go higher than anticipated because his hit data is strong and he also has big physical tools.
12. Boston Red Sox
Pick: James Tibbs, OF, Florida State
There is no consensus as to what Boston will do here. I’ve spoken with people who think Craig Breslow’s background in pitching dev will push the org in that direction, but Trey Yesavage and one or two of the high school pitchers are the only feasible options here, and if you’re good at pitching dev you don’t have to use first round resources on one.
13. San Francisco Giants
Pick: Cam Caminiti, LHP, Saguaro HS (AZ)
I’ve had scouts mention high school lefties Caminiti and Kash Mayfield here, and I considered mocking Carson Benge here based on San Francisco’s patterns of behavior because, like Reggie Crawford and Bryce Eldridge before him, he’s a two-way player who might have another gear once he focuses on one thing. I also wonder if Theo Gillen is a fit here because the Giants take players who end up falling for non-talent reasons (Crawford had TJ, Walker Martin wasn’t a showcase fixture, Carson Whisenhunt was suspended, etc.). Gillen hasn’t been able to throw well since a labrum injury, but he might be the best high school hitter in this class (I think he is).
14. Chicago Cubs
Pick: Malcolm Moore, C, Stanford
You could put any of the college hitters who performed from a bat-to-ball standpoint here. Moore only hit .255 this year, but his underlying data is great and indicates he was the victim of bad luck. Like Matt Shaw last year, Moore isn’t a lock to stay at his current position because of a mediocre arm.
15. Seattle Mariners
Pick: Trey Yesavage, RHP, East Carolina
This sounds like it might be Yesavage’s absolute floor. The Mariners were on him coming out of high school.
16. Miami Marlins
Pick: Cam Smith, 3B, Florida State
This would be a great value pick at this spot, and unlike a lot of other “safe” college hitters, Smith has some swing optimization stuff to work on. His timeline also fits better with the Marlins’ window of contention than the super polished college bats.
17. Milwaukee Brewers
Pick: Seaver King, SS, Wake Forest
The Brewers aren’t scared off by a lack of prototypical size (Eric Brown Jr., Robert Moore, Dylan O’Rae, etc.), which is the only thing King lacks. Milwaukee has also been more open to letting guys try to move up the defensive spectrum, which would ideally happen for King, who played mostly third base at Wake. This is the first spot Kaelen Culpepper’s name has surfaced. Carson Benge has also been mentioned here and at the next two picks.
18. Tampa Bay Rays
Pick: Christian Moore, 2B, Tennessee
I have Moore’s slide stopping here because, counterintuitive though it may be, the Rays tend to take toolsy college guys with suspect hit tools, like Moore. Carson Benge has also been mentioned here.
19. New York Mets
Pick: Carson Benge, OF, Oklahoma State
I suppose we’re getting into the area where some of the other top-tier high school pitchers are in play, but the tendency of David Stearns and co. in Milwaukee was to take guys who make contact like Benge does.
This next third of the first round is where we should start seeing a ton of high school pitchers get drafted. Matching pitchers with potential teams at this stage is more about pattern recognition than substantive dope.
20. Toronto Blue Jays
Pick: William Schmidt, RHP, Catholic HS (LA)
If any of the hitters who I have mocked in the last 10 picks get here, I feel like they’d be in play. Toronto’s pitcher draftees tend to all have excellent breaking ball quality and Schmidt’s curveball may be the best in the draft. High school righty Ryan Sloan also has a great slider and a much lower release than Schmidt.
21. Minnesota Twins
Pick: Theo Gillen, 2B/CF, Westlake HS (TX)
Gillen might be the best high school hitter in this entire class, but injuries leave him poised to move from shortstop to either second base or center field in pro ball. Minnesota has been happy to scoop up hitters with health issues each of the last two drafts.
22. Baltimore Orioles
Pick: Brody Brecht, RHP, Iowa
Here begins the three- or four-team cluster of clubs that are really, really good at developing pitchers. Brecht has monster stuff and a huge frame; he’s basically the pitching version of Caglianone in this class. If any of the Orioles, Braves, Dodgers, or Yankees get their hands on him, they might turn him into a monster.
23. Los Angeles Dodgers
Pick: Kellon Lindsey, SS/CF, Hardee HS (FL)
There are also some prep arms who check the Dodgers’ usual boxes (undersized, athletic dudes with fastball ride and a good breaking ball) like Braylon Doughty and perhaps Ryan Sloan, but Lindsey’s upside is too big to let him slide any further, especially with San Diego lurking a few picks behind and looking for a Trea Turner mulligan.
24. Atlanta Braves
Pick: Braylon Doughty, RHP, Chaparral HS (CA)
Like the Dodgers, the Braves tend to care about fastball ride and breaking ball quality more than size and projectability. Other clubs think they’re going to take a pitcher here, with Doughty and Ryan Sloan the ones who feel the most like the Braves. This would also be an interesting spot to take Vance Honeycutt and see if you can rework his swing. Idaho high schooler Dax Whitney shares pitch characteristics with Doughty, and there was buzz late last night that Whitney might have a deal in hand with someone.
25. San Diego Padres
Pick: Kash Mayfield, LHP, Elk City (OK)
Rival clubs have tended to put the Padres on high school guys. Kellon Lindsey, Mayfield, and William Schmidt have all been mentioned.
26. New York Yankees
Pick: Ryan Sloan, RHP, York HS (IL)
I only have one rumor associated with the Yankees and it centers around Sloan. Sloan’s arm slot creates somewhat lateral action on his stuff, but they’ve had success developing guys like Michael King for whom that is also true.
27. Philadelphia Phillies
Pick: PJ Morlando, OF, Summerville HS (SC)
Teams have heard that the Phillies are considering Morlando, as well as the projectable flavor of high schooler pitchers who are poised to go in this range (Kash Mayfield, William Schmidt, Owen Hall, Dasan Hill).
28. Houston Astros
Pick: Tyson Lewis, SS, Millard West HS (NE)
Like the Rays, the Astros have an analytical reputation but tend to draft for tools more than statistical performance, and Lewis has those. As I began sourcing on these picks later in the round, the Lewis/Astros pairing was the first that emerged.
29. Arizona Diamondbacks
Pick: Jurrangelo Cijntje, RHP/LHP, Mississippi State
I have no specific dope here but other teams expect the D-backs, who have multiple comp pics, to select a couple different types of players the same way they did with their excellent 2019 class.
30. Texas Rangers
Pick: Dax Whitney, RHP, Blackfoot (ID)
This is the other club that has been mentioned as I’ve kicked the tires on the rumor that Whitney has a deal in hand.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Thanks Eric, this is awesome.
Count me in as team Wetherholt over Cags at pick 5. Will be interesting to see how this draft plays out, can’t wait.
There are definitely a couple of team philosophies mentioned here that to me seem like really bad ideas.
First, Oakland’s strong “preference for guys in the Southwest or on the West Coast” is a really bad idea. I realize that they basically can’t sign any high schoolers for the foreseeable future because they’ll just go to school, since they’d be stuck in a minor league stadium for the next 3-to-30 years. And Montgomery is a totally reasonable pick on the merits. But are JJ Wetherholt or Nick Kurtz going to go back to school rather than play for the A’s? I don’t think so.
Second, the Twins not being scared off by taking guys with health issues? They absolutely should be. Royce Lewis and Byron Buxton are great and all but if you had a choice between them and someone who doesn’t get hurt all the time? I think if they really don’t care about that (and maybe they do, maybe they don’t) they are probably mis-pricing injury risk here. It’s one thing to take Walker Jenkins when he’s the fifth guy in a five-person top tier, it’s another when there isn’t that consensus.
They famously passed on Mike Trout in part because he was from New Jersey even though Beane admitted that their scouts loved him.
when I read stuff like this I go back to the scene in Moneyball where all the baseball men at the table were talking about players’ jawline and girlfriends.
Like how does this still happen in 2024? Draft the guy who you think is good at baseball
As an American in his 40s, I am more surprised that anyone expects competent, thoughtful individuals to be empowered in organizations, especially those generally run by inheritors
I’m going to email Appleman to see if he can work out a way for me to upvote this comment more than once.
See: Pirates.
Just goes to show that even analytics guys can be pretty dumb some times.
I think your claim about the A’s inability to sign HSers is a massive stretch
Maybe! But I bet any player who talks to the A’s is giving out a much higher bonus number at the minimum. The organization already had a pretty lousy reputation for how they treated minor leaguers, but the word is that players are paying a ton of attention to the whole “playing in a minor league park” situation. If they’re signing any high schoolers in this draft they’re going to pay for it.
Nick Kurtz or Jac, on the other hand? They have no leverage.
I wouldn’t take Eric’s speculation, based on a few draft picks from a few years, as gospel. Lots of teams draft extensively from the Southwest and West, because that’s where the more competitive programs are (plus Florida).
Man, if Condon goes to the Reds and the hit tool plays at all he’s going to smash like a kajillion homers at Great American Bandbox.
A few thoughts on that 60% of the draft:
–If the Nationals are more in on college performers now than in the past they are probably hoping that Griffin isn’t the guy left over, but he’s a totally reasonable pick at #10. Whichever prospect is left over in that top 10, the Nationals should be thrilled to take him. That’s probably (in order of likelihood from highest to lowest) Griffin, Kurtz, Rainer, Hagen Smith. They should just take whoever is left. Maybe James Tibbs, I think I might take him over Kurtz (it’s close though).
–I think Waldschmidt may get mentioned so often as an underrated guy he might be overrated. You better be getting a good deal if you’re taking him at #11. I’d very much prefer James Tibbs or Trey Yesavage there.
–I would be blown away by Malcolm Moore going at #14, but maybe the Cubs would get him on an underslot deal? He does fit their tendencies well. Trey Yesavage also seems to fit their past draft tendencies. Carson Benge too, his metrics are supposedly very good.
–I think the Mariners would like Yesavage too, but Theo Gillen also sounds like a very Mariners pick. Maybe Kellon Lindsey. I also wonder if they would go for Cijntje, I heard his right-handed pitching is very metric friendly.
–I think there’s a pretty good chance that either the Marlins or Rays go for William Schmidt. Neither team is going to be afraid of taking high school pitching.
–I find it difficult to believe that Seaver King is going to fall that far. If he does, the Brewers should be thrilled. But if he doesn’t, someone like Cam Smith probably will.
–Benge seems like a decent bet to go to one of the Brewers, Mets, Twins or Orioles. The Brewers (and probably Mets) are typically more in on guys who make contact, the Twins or Orioles on guys who hit hard. But he does both, even if the results aren’t quite as impressive as the underlying metrics.
There seems to be a lot of consideration given to things other than best player in 4 years available. Full Stop. “Express Lane”, “College Pitcher”, “underclass performance”…who cares? This seems like a recipe for picking a dud.
I can see picking players who would benefit from your development strengths in later rounds but first round should be about the best baseball talent available
Sometimes this is just because a team’s model traditionally favors certain types of players. For example, some teams frequently pick young high school players, college bats with big exit velocities, or college pitchers where you have good data and some performance information. That’s just because the teams have models that tell them that this type of player typically succeeds. Similarly, the Guardians don’t think the most recent information is that much more important than the information from the previous year. These are effectively process issues.
But there are definitely cases where this is a problem. The Angels repeatedly picking guys who are fast to the majors? The Rockies deciding that they need more pitchers? These are cases where they are letting needs right now dictate what sort of player they’re going to pick.
If they’re picking Westerholt over Bazzana at 1/1 for that reason it’s silly. 1/1 should be about best talent. If how is it possible that development at 21-22 has negligible value? This seems like they’re looking for an underappreciated player. That’s fine in round 2, not round 1
I think the argument is that Wetherholt’s performance in 2023 convinced them he’s on the same level as Bazzana. It’s not totally crazy on its face, Eric has them rated the same grade. (I don’t agree with them having the same grade, but that’s not really what you were talking about in the first post)
Right. The answer may be correct, but the process as described in the article is not.
I’m not sure its wrong to look at the entirety of the guys college career rather than just his most recent season. Remember the college season is fairly short compared to an MLB season. A hot streak or slump can have an outsized impact on the stats for one college season.
That would be sensible. But the article as written makes it sound like they would ignore the recent performance or injury, which I find strange.
I think its less about ignoring recent performance/injury and more about not ignoring prior performance. How much do you weigh last year vs this year? Giving more to last year isn’t strange, just different.
Not really sure how anyone can say something like this if they’ve been following the past, idk, 15 years of draft strategy. “BPA” usually isn’t even a thing after the first tier of picks despite whatever mock draft consensus tells you, and it often isn’t even a real thing in that first tier. The Orioles had 3 straight years of not taking the “best” player available in the top 5 picks and all 3 of those picks have a decent chance of ending up with better careers than the guys they were “supposed” to take.
Based on this, the guys falling out of the first round who are often mocked there are Walker Janek, Caleb Lomavita, Tommy White, and Vance Honeycutt.
Of course the Cubs pick the white kid from stanford who can’t hit. Of course.
If this is Nico Hoerner slander, I’ll not have that about a guy who’s put up over 10 WAR over the last 2.5
(And Malcolm Moore can really hit, so we’re not even barking up the right tree there)
Strange comment considering Hoerner has the most WAR of anyone in that draft and he was taken 24th.
No, it’s not. It’s a comment on how the team is generally constructed. It appeals to a certain midwest fanbase
There it is. This guy’s a troll
Ugh, more like NPC.
How strong are those Kurtz to the top 10 with the Card and Pirates connections? I feel that would be a disappointing pick for both. Especially the Cards since they so rarely have a high draft pick and should go all ceiling with their pick. Rainer fits that mold and is who I think they should take which Eric does have mocked.
My one comment, as I know little of the players, is that I’m bummed that the Twins aren’t in the group of teams great at developing pitchers……because they 100% need to be since they won’t sign big time FA pitchers (and I think the CC thing is an exception among hitters, as he fell back into them in many ways).
It’s depressing that it feels more likely than not that Burns is going to the Rockies. I think he’d have a great shot at being the best player of this draft if he went to an org with good pitching development.
He’s definitely gonna get Booo-urrnnssed there.
I think Geoff Pontes of BA said recently that their pitching dev stuff has gotten better. He didn’t elaborate but I generally view him as reputable enough.
It’s hard to know whether pitchers are going to make it at Coors. He might be fine since he has a slider and not a curveball, and he throws very hard. But there are some pitchers who would be excellent elsewhere who will struggle at Coors. Blake Snell has pitched badly at Coors Field and Zac Gallen has pitched well.
I would argue that this probably means the Rockies should not spend their first round draft pick on a pitcher regularly, which means that is what the Rockies have done and will continue to do for a while. But if Bazzana and Condon are off the board (both of whom would be phenomenal picks for them for various reasons) I’m not sure there’s an obvious fit except maybe Braden Montgomery. Most teams should be grabbing pitchers in bulk after the first round anyway because it’s not clear who is going to pan out and who isn’t, and that goes double for the Rockies, but I’m not totally sure that Burns is a “bad” pick for them even if I wouldn’t do it.
That’s two mock’s today that have Benge to the Mets – book it!
Wonder if the Mets would let him develop as a 2-way player to begin his professional career. Obviously the hitting results have not been what you hope for Nolan McLean (50%+ K-rates as a hitter, hasn’t batted in 3 weeks), but the Mets are currently getting experience developing a 2-way player, and it sounds like Benge’s arm would not be pushing him to the upper levels before his bat is ready, which is what happened with McLean.
1st round quality batter + 2nd/3rd round quality arm -> why not try developing both from the start?
The Orioles are “really really good at developing pitchers”?
As an O’s fan I love to hear that, but am shocked. I guess I just internalized the exact opposite sentiment after they bungled all of Arrieta / Matusz / Britton / Bundy / Gausman / Harvey.
I mean, I’ve noticed that they’ve invented an entire bullpen worth of quality relievers out of seemingly nothing, but I kind of assumed that would eventually suffer regression. And Bradish certainly exceeded expectations. Is that enough to make you “really really good at developing pitchers”?
Half of those pitchers were drafted over 15 years and three GMs ago… Might be time to update your priors.
Haha, yeah. When I saw Bundy and Gausmann on his list I had to do a double take. Like, both those guys are over 30 now. Matsuz is damn near 40!
They’re old references… but who are the good pitchers the Orioles have developed? Bradish is one but he’s 27, has thrown ~200 quality innings, and is going to be hurt for the foreseeable future.
Forgive me, but some scars are deep and I did recognize that it was an internalized sentiment.
That admitted, which guys are the evidence for them being really really good? To their credit, they’ve been very adept at picking relievers off other teams’ scrapheaps, though relievers are so variable, and we’ve already seen the magic wear off for Cano and Perez. Rodriguez is a stud, but always has been. Kremer has turned into a #4 starter, which I guess is better than a #5 he could have been. Irvin is less than he was in Oakland and the magic dust is wearing off Suarez. Bradish is obviously a success. I don’t know if they get credit or discredit for Means.
That’s not the awful track record they used to have, but is that really enough to make them one of the best in the league at developing pitchers, or am I missing something?
The more accurate critique of Eric’s observation is that Elias almost *never* drafts an arm that high. It’s been 7 years and 2 teams since he was at the table for a P in R1. And who knows if he agreed with…JB Bukauskis (2017).
To the extent Elias/Sig have a secret sauce in the draft, it’s with hitters. Unorthodox, hard contact hitters especially. He’ll sooner go off the board than go pitcher, I suspect.
Great article, it’s really interesting to see how different teams strategize and their tendencies (for better and worse). I just noticed a small bug with The Board’s MLB Draft tab — sorting by the first column, Rank, sorts by the string value of the number, rather than the rank of the number. E.g. the first few in order are 1, 10, 100, 11, 12, etc. when sorting by that Rank column
Lindsey is listed at 6’2″ on the board, but is referred to as “diminutive” and given physical comps of Edman, Jett Williams. Guessing that height is a mistake?
Hey, Junior Caminero is still listed at 5’11” / 157. We take what we can get.
Thanks for this amazing coverage, Eric. Do you think there’s less risk with a guy like Kurtz than a Pavan Smith sort? Should the Bucs be worried if they take him given Vaughns and Torkelsons? They really can’t have another Henry Davis situation where their terrible dev team gets exposed by a player they’re unable to help, right?
That’s the reason to take Kurtz or Tibbs. They’re more likely to have a college player make to Pittsburgh intact. Taking prep players will waste a pick and the money it takes to sign the player.
I’d rather the Pirates take a pitcher than a prep player. The team stands a chance of getting value for its money.
Damn, I really like that Rainer/Cardinals pick. They’re really well positioned to benefit from draft noise it seems, also saw alot of Hagen Smith in mocks
I’ll say it again: think everyone’s sleeping on Braden Montgomery at 1. Guy literally turned A&M into a CWS finalist, has a loaded athletic and baseball background, has power from both sides of the plate, and only started to start focusing on hitting full time this year.
I like Moore enough in this draft but don’t see the Cubs fit. They prefer defense at catcher, and aren’t as thirsty for a LHH as the offseason. I keep coming back to Janek
I’m leaning college for SD. Their farm’s already very young, and
Prefer Culpepper to King? Idk .377 OBP what happened there
Brody Brecht, Jeff Samardzija 2.0
Samardzija/Glasnow hybrid? Is that healthy Walker Buehler?
I think he sounds a lot like Pirates reliever Kyle Nicolas
Often find myself wishing the “draft slot/overslot/underslot” games didn’t exist. Would love to see how the draft would play out if teams just stuck 100% to picking the guys who they thought they could best develop and left the money out of it. Obviously would need to find a way to have high school guys commit to either in/out of draft, but always annoys me when the best players don’t get taken for financial reasons.
I might be in the minority on that though.
The real answer is just to let teams trade picks. The slot gaming is largely a workaround of being unable to trade.