Reminder: Membership Prices Will Increase Starting August 4

Reminder: Starting August 4, the price of a FanGraphs Membership is going up. You can find more information on the reason for the increase, as well as how to lock in our existing pricing, in the post below. As I noted when we announced the pricing change on June 10, Membership makes our work at the site possible, allowing us to add new site features and grow our staff, and it comes with a ton of great benefits. Since that announcement, we’ve launched a pitch-type splits leaderboard and a crowdsourced trade value tool, and we’ve added a full-time staff member. We know there is intense competition for your subscription dollars, but we think the breadth and depth of our coverage makes a Membership well worth it and still represents a considerable value in the sports media subscription landscape. I hope you’ll become a Member, and help us continue to build a better FanGraphs. Thank you for your support. – David Appelman

Over the last five years, as we’ve navigated a changing advertising landscape — not to mention the pandemic and a lockout — I’ve endeavored to be transparent about the state of the site, our business model, and our plans for the future. I’ve taken that approach because FanGraphs is a community, and I think our readers deserve to understand what we are doing and why. It’s been four years since we last increased the price of a FanGraphs Membership, and we’ve delayed this increase for as long as possible. We’ve not only seen considerable increases in our stat licensing fees and infrastructure costs, but this year we’ve also seen a steep decline in our advertising rates as well as our organic search traffic, as Google continues to push relevant websites further and further down the page in favor of new AI search results.

Beginning August 4, a yearly FanGraphs Membership will cost $80; a Monthly Membership will cost $15 a month, while a Three-Year Membership will cost $200. Since we won’t be introducing this change until August 4, you still have the opportunity to purchase a $60 Membership for the year, or upgrade your existing Membership to a $150 Three-Year Membership, allowing you to grandfather yourself into our existing pricing for the next three years.

Note: If you are switching an existing subscription to a Three-Year Membership, you may not be charged until your Membership actually renews. The current Three-Year price of $150 will be honored at the time of renewal.

The good news is that despite the challenges that necessitate this increase, your support has helped us grow. We’ve added so many new site features since our last price increase that they could take up this entire post and then some. We’ve added five new full-time staff members. We’ve incorporated Negro Leagues data into the site and revamped our leaderboards. We launched a mobile app, and added PitchingBot and Stuff+ pitch modeling. We redesigned our projection boards, and added weather data to our splits, as well as spring training data, postseason leaderboards and full historical postseason data.

In just the last year, we’ve added a bunch of new features to the site, including:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

We’ve also enhanced and improved a ton of our existing features, including:

Membership comes with ad-free browsing, one-click data exports, and unlimited FanGraphs and RotoGraphs articles. It has also allowed us to bring you greater site customization; indeed, as I noted in my State of FanGraphs post in April, customization has become a key tenet of Membership. We don’t want to force you to see baseball or FanGraphs the way we do. We want to let you choose what you want to see and how you want to see it, from flipping the site into Dark or Classic mode, to removing photos from the home page, to setting up your own player page dashboards and custom reports and leaderboards.

We recognize that not everyone is in a position to pay for a FanGraphs Membership, especially students. If you are a student with a valid .edu e-mail address, please send us an e-mail at support@fangraphs.com and we will send you a coupon code that will discount your Membership by 50% for up to four years. Additionally, if you are a teacher teaching a class where FanGraphs might be a valuable resource, please let us know and we can make appropriate accommodations for your students.

We realize that there is intense competition for your subscription dollars, and that we’re all dealing with economic uncertainty, but we think that the depth and breadth of our coverage makes FanGraphs worth your hard-earned money and still presents a considerable value in the sports media subscription landscape. We don’t partner with sportsbooks. We don’t have corporate overlords or outside investors. Our articles aren’t written by AI. Our 15 full-time staff members and 17 contributing writers are supported by advertising revenue and your Membership dollars. Member support of the site has allowed us to grow over past four years, just as we have throughout our 20-year history. So if you’re in a position to do so, I hope you’ll become a Member, and help us continue to build a better FanGraphs.





David Appelman is the creator of FanGraphs.

84 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jonathan Vander LugtMember since 2016
1 year ago

So I had a $60 annual and just changed to $150 every 3 years. It charged me $0 – will my charge next February be $150 for a three-year subscription then?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  David Appelman

I had the exact same question. Thanks for looking into it, hopefully it will work?

splendidsplinterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  David Appelman

I’ve just upgraded and I’m seeing the same issue.

3cardmontyMember since 2025
1 year ago
Reply to  David Appelman

I have an active membership and upgraded to the 3-year plan renewing in December but was immediately charged $11.82 for some reason?

JuuuustAnotherBaseballFanMember since 2018
1 year ago

Thanks for the heads up on this… I didn’t know about the 3 year option.

JuuuustAnotherBaseballFanMember since 2018
1 year ago

I don’t mind supporting the site given how often I use it. 80/365 = 22 cents a day, which I can do. Thankfully, even if one cannot afford the cost of membership, one can still use the site and maybe think about joining someday.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
1 year ago

I easily lose more than $0.22 of productivity each day on this site. Seems a bargain!

Last edited 1 year ago by HappyFunBall
TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago

Signed up for the three year plan. I think it is only fitting that Fangraphs is now the thing I have the longest commitment to, other than my wife I suppose.

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  TKDC

Sounds like someone is batting 1.000…

IraMember since 2019
1 year ago

Since it’s often hard to find somewhere to make a suggestion, can we add greater than, less than, equal to, etc. filters to the leaderboards. Or, in the alternative, can we broaden the stat filter on the Splits Leaderboards to include more advanced categories? Thanks.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  Ira

Agreed on this one. I miss that on the old leaderboards (though I remember it taking a really long time to load?).

Also why aren’t +Stats on individual player pages? Having to go the leaderboards and do a single custom players filter is a long workaround to a useful data point.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Also in the thread of suggestions for crossing player pages and leaderboards: it would be neat to have the MiLB plate discipline data on a leaderboard rather than just individual players. Maybe it’s tricky because some of the data is only available for AAA but some of the data appears to be available for every level.

I can tell you who in AAA this year had the highest z-contact% but I’d have to go to every single player page to do it. Feels like that could just be a leaderboard tab?

TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago

Having gone as far as three years, have you considered lifetime memberships? I’d guess at least a few would be open to paying for that. Obviously anyone getting one would be open to the risk applicable to any business ceasing operation, but some might want to show their support and commitment. Just an idea.

baseballtimeintexasMember since 2024
1 year ago

Just switched to the 3 year membership. Very happy to support Fangraphs and all the great people that work there.

Mario MendozaMember since 2017
1 year ago

Is there a way to pay a little more than what you are asking (like the PBS model)?

Last edited 1 year ago by Mario Mendoza
Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  David Appelman

“Lifetime membership and come drink Yoohoo and play RBI Baseball at Appelman’s house: $500”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason B

Who is supplying the Yoohoo? FG? Depending on one’s Yoohoo consumption that could really turn out badly for FG…

remember2004
11 months ago
Reply to  Jason B

As an Aussie I had to google Yoohoo! I will turn up for the RBI Baseball but I’ll stick to Vegemite sandwiches instead!

Cole
1 year ago

I wish we could access Rotographs articles on the iOS app. Still proud to be a member and would pay multiple more price increases for the value provided by this site and its contributors.

CrapshootMember since 2016
1 year ago

Still a bargain.

@David – do you have a preference from a cash / biz perspective about signing up for the 3 year membership now vs 1 year?

TransmissionMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  Crapshoot

Came here to ask this. If it’s no difference to FanGraphs, I’ll just do the 3/150 right now. If you’d rather I renew at 3/200 next April, will do so.

Also, I hadn’t thought of the plunging ad revenue as yet another reason to get around to using a default search engine that doesn’t generate AI results. Gonna go do that now, thanks.

Last edited 1 year ago by Transmission
Make WAR Not LoveMember since 2022
1 year ago
Reply to  Transmission

I switched over to DuckDuckGo, which you can turn the AI results on or off. I didn’t think of AI pushing better links down before. I mostly just did it to reduce my carbon footprint.

TransmissionMember since 2017
1 year ago

Thanks, that wound up being what I did, also in large part for reducing carbon footprint…

wenzMember since 2024
1 year ago

I’d rather pay the extra money than have this site go away

JameyMember since 2020
1 year ago

Thank you for being transparent about the coming price changes.

I’m happily a FG member. As a website I read every day, the value per dollar spent is hard to beat.

JRMayneMember since 2016
1 year ago

So I am now hooked up with the 3-year discount. “A Note on Membership Pricing” resulting in a price decrease for me… is not what I anticipated.

I can only quote noted philosopher HJS on a different pricing scheme: “Two dollars? And it only transports matter? I’ll give you thirty five cents.”

FG’s worth the 14 cents per day I’ll be paying for it.

Broken BatMember since 2020
1 year ago

I am in questionable health. Is there a way to opt for the 3 year pricing but provide me the option to renew on annual basis by selecting the 3 year look forward pricing?

thaaldermanMember since 2024
1 year ago

I don’t pay for any other websites, but you guys are the best baseball website (and maybe even best website in general) on the internet and it’s not even close.

Absolutely worth it.

AaronMember since 2019
1 year ago

I am a heavy user of this site, evidenced by that cool end of year recap you did last year. I use the site year-round. I’ll be leaving my account on yearly auto-renew. If your budget calls for $80 yearly from subscribers, that’s still worth it to me.

Last edited 1 year ago by Aaron
IAgreeGoGuardsMember since 2018
1 year ago

Always appreciate the transparency. Question:

I have been a member since 2020. My membership has been auto-renewing at $25 yearly. Is that an error? I don’t see any option that currently costs $25

richwp01Member since 2019
1 year ago

I appreciate the transparency and notice for the changes. Happy to continue being a member.

ChrisMember since 2014
1 year ago

The best site around! Was unaware of the 3-year option until today but definitely making the switch. In my *12th year of membership (looking back my first Fangraphs+ order was actually in 2013!) and it’s paid for itself in the endless hours of research, entertainment, and learning so much about the game I love!

Last edited 1 year ago by Chris
hopbittersMember since 2020
1 year ago

Stand, in the end, you’ll still be you

(that is to say, I’m on board. Also, RIP Sly)

ChapelHeel66Member since 2018
1 year ago

Thanks for the update and the opportunity to lock in today’s rate.

HurtyaMember since 2020
1 year ago

So it seemed like currently/previously, there was both an ad-supported membership ($25/yr) and an ad-free membership ($60/yr). Are y’all getting rid of the former?

SaltyMember since 2017
1 year ago

I look at it like a discount: I’m paying $60 a year now, so there’s greater incentive to re-up for 3 at $50 per.

RobertMember since 2016
1 year ago

I re-upped for 3 years because I 98% love the site. Again, I ask to deep six the political ink. …and, I make NO mention re left/right. So all of you haters, pls respond WHY you hate, not just the onslaught of thumbs down. Do you want politics or baseball?

TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert

I do not want random political articles, but politics has always intertwined with baseball (sports), and when it does, like when Trump advocates for a similarly immoral man to be in the HOF, ignoring it seems weird. However, these articles make up no more than one percent of the total content and they are almost always easily identifiable from the title and can easily be skipped.

I’ve noticed little if any mentions of politics that aren’t germane to the specific topic being discussed. It strikes me as you are either looking to be offended or you have an incredibly quick trigger and that’s really a you problem.

NathanMember since 2018
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert

Politics has always been in baseball and the right doesn’t mind when it’s military fetishism all over baseball. If you aren’t complaining about that but are complaining when people want to include a pride day, you aren’t against politics in baseball, you are just a bigot.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert

The personal is political.

TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert

I tried to answer your question but I wrote a certain person’s name and called him “immoral” and got “Awaiting for approval,” so it seems to me that if anything Fangraphs should allow more discussion, not self-censor.

TKDCMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  David Appelman

I know, I was saying that the mention of a name create a flag, and to clarify that it was that name that did it, I made sure to mention that all I did was call him “immoral,” since my first draft referred to him by the crime that both him and Rose (allegedly) committed.

I’ll say I don’t even care that this type of thing gets flagged, but it just makes complaints seem almost surreal.

Jorge FabregasMember since 2016
11 months ago
Reply to  Robert

Things like CBAs, stadium subsidies, the addition of Negro Leagues stats to the Major League cannon, the league removing language about race/segregation in Jackie Robinson Day material are all explicitly political.

joalkMember since 2018
1 year ago

I plan on changing to the “$150.00 every 3 years” plan…but I see that the renewal page will charge me an immediate “$21.13 sign-up fee”.

Are others getting that fee? This pricing post didn’t explain that aspect.

phaddixMember since 2016
1 year ago

I guess I am in the minority here who finds the price increase a bit extreme. Shifting from $25 per year to $50 with a promised increase to $80 a year seems candidly quite high. While I appreciate the candor of the article and transparency I’d encourage the site leadership to consider more of a tiered approach to the pricing model.

For some whose profession or daily fantasy habits depend on Fangraphs $80 may be reasonable. For others (like me) casual baseball fans who enjoy classic Roto style $80 feels like a LOT to pay – especially with every other site seeking to monetize and subscriptionize my wallet.

Would have loved to see you come up with an option that remained at $25 but with a reduction in service – for example maybe I see ads but can still export data etc.

BoneyFaxonMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  phaddix

Agree. Although I dig the site, I’d rather pay $25 for a membership that’s lighter on features than pay for a sizable increase.

jdbolickMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  phaddix

It is a lot, but as someone who spent over twenty years for a magazine that recently went under, times are really tough for print and online content. Ad rates just aren’t even close to what they used to be, so publishers depend on subscriptions now.

I don’t use FanGraphs nearly as much as I used to, and they really need to hire someone to help Eric with the prospect lists, but I would rather be slightly annoyed about paying more than be really annoyed about looking for a new site because FanGraphs had to shut down.

markjdMember since 2016
1 year ago

Get that bag. It’s gonna be bleak when 85% of the managerial/professional class loses their job to AI in a year or 3.

Jason BMember since 2017
11 months ago
Reply to  markjd

 85% of the managerial/professional class loses their job to AI in a year or 3*.

*Citation needed

EasyenoughMember since 2016
1 year ago

I didn’t remember opting into the 3 year sub. Saw the $150 on my card: wow that price went up.

You can imagine my relief at learning it was a 3 yr.

Also, I have never gone wrong with a lifetime subscription, or in other words, every vendor has lost major money on my lifetime subs. Maybe only offer it to people 70+.

NathanMember since 2018
1 year ago

I love Fangraphs, but $80 per year feels steep. Are you sure you won’t lose money with this transition? Maybe segment your market more so you can get lots of money from people who want the extra tools, and still get some money from people who just want no ads?

mrenick1974Member since 2018
1 year ago

I’ll change my sub to 3-year to capture the $150 price…and re-evaluate the situation in 3 years. And I appreciate the fact that I can do that both in terms of being able to afford it and in being afforded the opportunity to grandfather my current price in for a few years.

dtpollittMember since 2016
1 year ago

Love FanGraphs and happy to update to a 3 year membership if it means FanGraphs viability is ensured. Keep up the awesome work.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
1 year ago

Shut up and Take my Money (lovingly said)

chloesdad2024
11 months ago

I will upgrade to 3/150
once my current membership expires in October .
Love the site

chloesdad2024
11 months ago
Reply to  David Appelman

Thanks ,just did that.
Looking forward to all the great content at a great price.

booondMember since 2019
11 months ago

Done

branflakesMember since 2024
11 months ago

Are you guys not doing weekly power rankings anymore? Used to be pretty regular Monday update, but they’ve been very sporadic last month, and havent seen an update in a couple weeks now.

Jon L.Member since 2016
11 months ago

I’m also in this camp where I may monthly fee was raised to $25 a couple of years ago, but it looks like no comparable option exists. So my rate would leap from $25 to this $60/$150 tier if I renew this week, otherwise $80/$200?

Jon L.Member since 2016
11 months ago
Reply to  David Appelman

Thank you for clarifying. Indeed, I searched my emails and uncovered the June 11 email (right between Luis Arraez’ “contact rate death spiral” and PCA’s alien in the outfield).

Sounds like it’s time to move on from the absurdly underpriced grandfather plan to something a little more economically sustainable.

DanielMember since 2016
11 months ago

I love this website and am very happy to support y’all. Keep up the great work.

KennyMember since 2020
11 months ago

Where is the “10-year subscription with all deferred payments” option?

scottsjunk1981Member since 2021
11 months ago

I just switched to the 3 year plan, and I appreciate that members were given this notice and were able to lock in the bargain rate. This price is more than fair, and I’m happy to pay it.

But I am a bit curious if part of the timing of this – which I believe will push many (most?) dedicated subscribers to a three year plan – is motivated in part by a desire to spread the risk around a possible lockout in 2027.

If I recall correctly, 2020 was a very hard time for FG and prompted some serious shifts in the business model. It would make tons of sense for FG to want to get ahead of that a bit by trading some expected revenue for a smoother projection / less downside risk in futures where we lose significant portions of that season.

I don’t really expect DA to reply to this and let us know their thinking, though he and FG have been uncommonly transparent on these issues, so maybe they will be willing to confirm or give additional context.

scottsjunk1981Member since 2021
11 months ago
Reply to  David Appelman

Thank you for replying. I really appreciate the openness and integrity. And thanks for the great website!

Dan GreerMember since 2018
11 months ago

Upped for 3 more years. Thanks for offering this option – I don’t see my readership dwindling anytime soon.

frankMember since 2025
11 months ago

So how do I determine if I am a paid member, and when my paid membership expires? Since I am logged in, does that mean I am a member?

NATS FanMember since 2018
11 months ago

upgraded to 3 years at $150

ThomasMember since 2017
11 months ago

I too had a $60 annual, just switched to the 3 year $150 subscription. Thank you for all you and your writers do!

eandyMember since 2023
11 months ago

I upgraded to the 3 year because of this. Thank you to the whole Fangraphs team!

One feature that would be helpful, being able to favorite/bookmark articles. There have been some over the years that I go back and search for. Like one on Luis Arraez hitting the ball too hard, or how to contextualize prospect grades, Like 60 power = x estimated home runs.

It would be helpful for a quick way to go back to those via a favoriting/bookmark tool

barry6124
11 months ago

Is there an option that brings back Dayn and Carson?

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  barry6124

and Kiley, Jeff, and Eno?

PicardthedogMember since 2020
11 months ago

Just updated to 3 year. Thanks for all the great work you and your team provide.