Reminder: Membership Prices Will Increase Starting August 4
Reminder: Starting August 4, the price of a FanGraphs Membership is going up. You can find more information on the reason for the increase, as well as how to lock in our existing pricing, in the post below. As I noted when we announced the pricing change on June 10, Membership makes our work at the site possible, allowing us to add new site features and grow our staff, and it comes with a ton of great benefits. Since that announcement, we’ve launched a pitch-type splits leaderboard and a crowdsourced trade value tool, and we’ve added a full-time staff member. We know there is intense competition for your subscription dollars, but we think the breadth and depth of our coverage makes a Membership well worth it and still represents a considerable value in the sports media subscription landscape. I hope you’ll become a Member, and help us continue to build a better FanGraphs. Thank you for your support. – David Appelman
Over the last five years, as we’ve navigated a changing advertising landscape — not to mention the pandemic and a lockout — I’ve endeavored to be transparent about the state of the site, our business model, and our plans for the future. I’ve taken that approach because FanGraphs is a community, and I think our readers deserve to understand what we are doing and why. It’s been four years since we last increased the price of a FanGraphs Membership, and we’ve delayed this increase for as long as possible. We’ve not only seen considerable increases in our stat licensing fees and infrastructure costs, but this year we’ve also seen a steep decline in our advertising rates as well as our organic search traffic, as Google continues to push relevant websites further and further down the page in favor of new AI search results.
Beginning August 4, a yearly FanGraphs Membership will cost $80; a Monthly Membership will cost $15 a month, while a Three-Year Membership will cost $200. Since we won’t be introducing this change until August 4, you still have the opportunity to purchase a $60 Membership for the year, or upgrade your existing Membership to a $150 Three-Year Membership, allowing you to grandfather yourself into our existing pricing for the next three years.
Note: If you are switching an existing subscription to a Three-Year Membership, you may not be charged until your Membership actually renews. The current Three-Year price of $150 will be honored at the time of renewal.
The good news is that despite the challenges that necessitate this increase, your support has helped us grow. We’ve added so many new site features since our last price increase that they could take up this entire post and then some. We’ve added five new full-time staff members. We’ve incorporated Negro Leagues data into the site and revamped our leaderboards. We launched a mobile app, and added PitchingBot and Stuff+ pitch modeling. We redesigned our projection boards, and added weather data to our splits, as well as spring training data, postseason leaderboards and full historical postseason data.
In just the last year, we’ve added a bunch of new features to the site, including:
- The FanGraphs Weekly Mailbag (Member exclusive)
- Customizable player page dashboards and player cards, like heat maps, rolling averages, and more (Member exclusive)
- Fantasy player rater
- Division I college data
- NPB data
- New heat maps
- Pitch modeling game logs
- WAR-based Playoff Odds
- Steamer platoon, context neutral, and percentile projections (Member exclusive)
- Historical Steamer, ZiPS, and ATC projections (Member exclusive)
- OOPSY projections
- FanGraphs Walk-Off (Member exclusive)
We’ve also enhanced and improved a ton of our existing features, including:
- Revamping our player pages
- Upgrading our spray charts
- Improving player search
- Improving our live data feed
- Relaunching the community research blog
Membership comes with ad-free browsing, one-click data exports, and unlimited FanGraphs and RotoGraphs articles. It has also allowed us to bring you greater site customization; indeed, as I noted in my State of FanGraphs post in April, customization has become a key tenet of Membership. We don’t want to force you to see baseball or FanGraphs the way we do. We want to let you choose what you want to see and how you want to see it, from flipping the site into Dark or Classic mode, to removing photos from the home page, to setting up your own player page dashboards and custom reports and leaderboards.
We recognize that not everyone is in a position to pay for a FanGraphs Membership, especially students. If you are a student with a valid .edu e-mail address, please send us an e-mail at support@fangraphs.com and we will send you a coupon code that will discount your Membership by 50% for up to four years. Additionally, if you are a teacher teaching a class where FanGraphs might be a valuable resource, please let us know and we can make appropriate accommodations for your students.
We realize that there is intense competition for your subscription dollars, and that we’re all dealing with economic uncertainty, but we think that the depth and breadth of our coverage makes FanGraphs worth your hard-earned money and still presents a considerable value in the sports media subscription landscape. We don’t partner with sportsbooks. We don’t have corporate overlords or outside investors. Our articles aren’t written by AI. Our 15 full-time staff members and 17 contributing writers are supported by advertising revenue and your Membership dollars. Member support of the site has allowed us to grow over past four years, just as we have throughout our 20-year history. So if you’re in a position to do so, I hope you’ll become a Member, and help us continue to build a better FanGraphs.
David Appelman is the creator of FanGraphs.
So I had a $60 annual and just changed to $150 every 3 years. It charged me $0 – will my charge next February be $150 for a three-year subscription then?
Yeah, I do see that’s happening. Though I’m not sure why it’s not charging a pro-rated rate. If this happens, you’ll be charged $150 when your subscription renews and we will continue to honor that 3 year renewal pricing through the end of 2026.
New 3-year signups after August 4th will be at the new rate of $200 and renewals starting in 2027.
I had the exact same question. Thanks for looking into it, hopefully it will work?
It will definitely work and renew properly as long as the subscription remains active. If anyone has any issues when renewal time comes, just send me a note: support@fangraphs.com. I can always manually apply a discount if the membership gets accidentally canceled, or there’s a bad credit card and it doesn’t renew.
I’ve just upgraded and I’m seeing the same issue.
Yeah, this is apparently just how it is. You’ll be charged on your next renewal. If there’s any issues, just let me know.
I have an active membership and upgraded to the 3-year plan renewing in December but was immediately charged $11.82 for some reason?
Thanks for the heads up on this… I didn’t know about the 3 year option.
I don’t mind supporting the site given how often I use it. 80/365 = 22 cents a day, which I can do. Thankfully, even if one cannot afford the cost of membership, one can still use the site and maybe think about joining someday.
I easily lose more than $0.22 of productivity each day on this site. Seems a bargain!
Signed up for the three year plan. I think it is only fitting that Fangraphs is now the thing I have the longest commitment to, other than my wife I suppose.
Sounds like someone is batting 1.000…
Since it’s often hard to find somewhere to make a suggestion, can we add greater than, less than, equal to, etc. filters to the leaderboards. Or, in the alternative, can we broaden the stat filter on the Splits Leaderboards to include more advanced categories? Thanks.
We’ll put this on the to-do list!
Agreed on this one. I miss that on the old leaderboards (though I remember it taking a really long time to load?).
Also why aren’t +Stats on individual player pages? Having to go the leaderboards and do a single custom players filter is a long workaround to a useful data point.
Also in the thread of suggestions for crossing player pages and leaderboards: it would be neat to have the MiLB plate discipline data on a leaderboard rather than just individual players. Maybe it’s tricky because some of the data is only available for AAA but some of the data appears to be available for every level.
I can tell you who in AAA this year had the highest z-contact% but I’d have to go to every single player page to do it. Feels like that could just be a leaderboard tab?
Having gone as far as three years, have you considered lifetime memberships? I’d guess at least a few would be open to paying for that. Obviously anyone getting one would be open to the risk applicable to any business ceasing operation, but some might want to show their support and commitment. Just an idea.
We’ve kicked around the idea of offering a limited number of lifetime memberships, but at least for the moment have decided against it.
Just switched to the 3 year membership. Very happy to support Fangraphs and all the great people that work there.
Is there a way to pay a little more than what you are asking (like the PBS model)?
We are considering a super supporter Membership, that could include an exclusive piece of FanGraphs merchandise, though we don’t have any specifics to share.
“Lifetime membership and come drink Yoohoo and play RBI Baseball at Appelman’s house: $500”
Who is supplying the Yoohoo? FG? Depending on one’s Yoohoo consumption that could really turn out badly for FG…
As an Aussie I had to google Yoohoo! I will turn up for the RBI Baseball but I’ll stick to Vegemite sandwiches instead!
I wish we could access Rotographs articles on the iOS app. Still proud to be a member and would pay multiple more price increases for the value provided by this site and its contributors.
Still a bargain.
@David – do you have a preference from a cash / biz perspective about signing up for the 3 year membership now vs 1 year?
Came here to ask this. If it’s no difference to FanGraphs, I’ll just do the 3/150 right now. If you’d rather I renew at 3/200 next April, will do so.
Also, I hadn’t thought of the plunging ad revenue as yet another reason to get around to using a default search engine that doesn’t generate AI results. Gonna go do that now, thanks.
I switched over to DuckDuckGo, which you can turn the AI results on or off. I didn’t think of AI pushing better links down before. I mostly just did it to reduce my carbon footprint.
Thanks, that wound up being what I did, also in large part for reducing carbon footprint…
I’d rather pay the extra money than have this site go away
Thank you for being transparent about the coming price changes.
I’m happily a FG member. As a website I read every day, the value per dollar spent is hard to beat.
So I am now hooked up with the 3-year discount. “A Note on Membership Pricing” resulting in a price decrease for me… is not what I anticipated.
I can only quote noted philosopher HJS on a different pricing scheme: “Two dollars? And it only transports matter? I’ll give you thirty five cents.”
FG’s worth the 14 cents per day I’ll be paying for it.
I am in questionable health. Is there a way to opt for the 3 year pricing but provide me the option to renew on annual basis by selecting the 3 year look forward pricing?
I don’t pay for any other websites, but you guys are the best baseball website (and maybe even best website in general) on the internet and it’s not even close.
Absolutely worth it.
I am a heavy user of this site, evidenced by that cool end of year recap you did last year. I use the site year-round. I’ll be leaving my account on yearly auto-renew. If your budget calls for $80 yearly from subscribers, that’s still worth it to me.
Always appreciate the transparency. Question:
I have been a member since 2020. My membership has been auto-renewing at $25 yearly. Is that an error? I don’t see any option that currently costs $25
I appreciate the transparency and notice for the changes. Happy to continue being a member.
The best site around! Was unaware of the 3-year option until today but definitely making the switch. In my *12th year of membership (looking back my first Fangraphs+ order was actually in 2013!) and it’s paid for itself in the endless hours of research, entertainment, and learning so much about the game I love!
(that is to say, I’m on board. Also, RIP Sly)
Thanks for the update and the opportunity to lock in today’s rate.
So it seemed like currently/previously, there was both an ad-supported membership ($25/yr) and an ad-free membership ($60/yr). Are y’all getting rid of the former?
I look at it like a discount: I’m paying $60 a year now, so there’s greater incentive to re-up for 3 at $50 per.
I re-upped for 3 years because I 98% love the site. Again, I ask to deep six the political ink. …and, I make NO mention re left/right. So all of you haters, pls respond WHY you hate, not just the onslaught of thumbs down. Do you want politics or baseball?
I do not want random political articles, but politics has always intertwined with baseball (sports), and when it does, like when Trump advocates for a similarly immoral man to be in the HOF, ignoring it seems weird. However, these articles make up no more than one percent of the total content and they are almost always easily identifiable from the title and can easily be skipped.
I’ve noticed little if any mentions of politics that aren’t germane to the specific topic being discussed. It strikes me as you are either looking to be offended or you have an incredibly quick trigger and that’s really a you problem.
Politics has always been in baseball and the right doesn’t mind when it’s military fetishism all over baseball. If you aren’t complaining about that but are complaining when people want to include a pride day, you aren’t against politics in baseball, you are just a bigot.
The personal is political.
I tried to answer your question but I wrote a certain person’s name and called him “immoral” and got “Awaiting for approval,” so it seems to me that if anything Fangraphs should allow more discussion, not self-censor.
Calling him “immoral” is not what flagged it.
I know, I was saying that the mention of a name create a flag, and to clarify that it was that name that did it, I made sure to mention that all I did was call him “immoral,” since my first draft referred to him by the crime that both him and Rose (allegedly) committed.
I’ll say I don’t even care that this type of thing gets flagged, but it just makes complaints seem almost surreal.
Things like CBAs, stadium subsidies, the addition of Negro Leagues stats to the Major League cannon, the league removing language about race/segregation in Jackie Robinson Day material are all explicitly political.
I plan on changing to the “$150.00 every 3 years” plan…but I see that the renewal page will charge me an immediate “$21.13 sign-up fee”.
Are others getting that fee? This pricing post didn’t explain that aspect.
If you were charged a pro-rated fee when you switched to a 3-year subscription, that was in error and everyone should have been refunded that amount as of now.
I guess I am in the minority here who finds the price increase a bit extreme. Shifting from $25 per year to $50 with a promised increase to $80 a year seems candidly quite high. While I appreciate the candor of the article and transparency I’d encourage the site leadership to consider more of a tiered approach to the pricing model.
For some whose profession or daily fantasy habits depend on Fangraphs $80 may be reasonable. For others (like me) casual baseball fans who enjoy classic Roto style $80 feels like a LOT to pay – especially with every other site seeking to monetize and subscriptionize my wallet.
Would have loved to see you come up with an option that remained at $25 but with a reduction in service – for example maybe I see ads but can still export data etc.
Agree. Although I dig the site, I’d rather pay $25 for a membership that’s lighter on features than pay for a sizable increase.
It is a lot, but as someone who spent over twenty years for a magazine that recently went under, times are really tough for print and online content. Ad rates just aren’t even close to what they used to be, so publishers depend on subscriptions now.
I don’t use FanGraphs nearly as much as I used to, and they really need to hire someone to help Eric with the prospect lists, but I would rather be slightly annoyed about paying more than be really annoyed about looking for a new site because FanGraphs had to shut down.
Get that bag. It’s gonna be bleak when 85% of the managerial/professional class loses their job to AI in a year or 3.
*Citation needed
I didn’t remember opting into the 3 year sub. Saw the $150 on my card: wow that price went up.
You can imagine my relief at learning it was a 3 yr.
Also, I have never gone wrong with a lifetime subscription, or in other words, every vendor has lost major money on my lifetime subs. Maybe only offer it to people 70+.
I love Fangraphs, but $80 per year feels steep. Are you sure you won’t lose money with this transition? Maybe segment your market more so you can get lots of money from people who want the extra tools, and still get some money from people who just want no ads?
I’ll change my sub to 3-year to capture the $150 price…and re-evaluate the situation in 3 years. And I appreciate the fact that I can do that both in terms of being able to afford it and in being afforded the opportunity to grandfather my current price in for a few years.
Love FanGraphs and happy to update to a 3 year membership if it means FanGraphs viability is ensured. Keep up the awesome work.
Shut up and Take my Money (lovingly said)
I will upgrade to 3/150
once my current membership expires in October .
Love the site
You’ll need to upgrade your Membership now if you want the $150 pricing, but you won’t be charged until October (or whenever your membership renews). If you wait until October to switch, it will be at the new 3-year price of $200.
Thanks ,just did that.
Looking forward to all the great content at a great price.
Done
Are you guys not doing weekly power rankings anymore? Used to be pretty regular Monday update, but they’ve been very sporadic last month, and havent seen an update in a couple weeks now.
There is one coming today. I think the only inconsistencies were the one we published on Tuesday (7/8) and last week we didn’t publish one because there was very little baseball played.
https://www.fangraphs.com/blog-roll?category=Power+Rankings
I’m also in this camp where I may monthly fee was raised to $25 a couple of years ago, but it looks like no comparable option exists. So my rate would leap from $25 to this $60/$150 tier if I renew this week, otherwise $80/$200?
We outlined this in an e-mail to all existing $25 Members, which it’s possible you missed.
The $25 ad supported plan was discontinued three years ago. I ended up fielding a lot e-mails about why Members in this tier were still seeing ads, especially when some Members experienced site performance issues with ads. It didn’t really make a ton of sense to continue offering it because of the confusion or the experience and the $25 rate was never priced to be ad free.
Since then we’ve added a lot of new features to Membership (including the metered paywall for articles). We also made every Membership ad free in the process.
If you were on a $25 plan and you do nothing and let your subscription renew you’d be at a $50 rate for 2026 and most likely an $80 rate for 2027 (we pledge not to increase rates to the full price until Jan 1 2027). Or, you could lock in the $50 rate for 3 years.
Thank you for clarifying. Indeed, I searched my emails and uncovered the June 11 email (right between Luis Arraez’ “contact rate death spiral” and PCA’s alien in the outfield).
Sounds like it’s time to move on from the absurdly underpriced grandfather plan to something a little more economically sustainable.
I love this website and am very happy to support y’all. Keep up the great work.
Where is the “10-year subscription with all deferred payments” option?
I just switched to the 3 year plan, and I appreciate that members were given this notice and were able to lock in the bargain rate. This price is more than fair, and I’m happy to pay it.
But I am a bit curious if part of the timing of this – which I believe will push many (most?) dedicated subscribers to a three year plan – is motivated in part by a desire to spread the risk around a possible lockout in 2027.
If I recall correctly, 2020 was a very hard time for FG and prompted some serious shifts in the business model. It would make tons of sense for FG to want to get ahead of that a bit by trading some expected revenue for a smoother projection / less downside risk in futures where we lose significant portions of that season.
I don’t really expect DA to reply to this and let us know their thinking, though he and FG have been uncommonly transparent on these issues, so maybe they will be willing to confirm or give additional context.
The 3-Year Membership doesn’t really have anything to do with a possible work stoppage. During the last lockout and the pandemic, the business model really broke with our advertising revenue.
We’ve actually had the 3-Year Member for almost 2 years, and even with this price increase, less than 10% of our Members have opted for it.
Honestly, I considered getting rid of the 3-Year Membership entirely because it skews revenue, and revenue next year is going to look deceptively better than it actually is, and I have to keep remember that when budgeting.
But, we all agreed it was important to give notice and highlight that we do have the 3-Year option available for those who would like to take advantage of it.
Thank you for replying. I really appreciate the openness and integrity. And thanks for the great website!
Upped for 3 more years. Thanks for offering this option – I don’t see my readership dwindling anytime soon.
So how do I determine if I am a paid member, and when my paid membership expires? Since I am logged in, does that mean I am a member?
upgraded to 3 years at $150
I too had a $60 annual, just switched to the 3 year $150 subscription. Thank you for all you and your writers do!
I upgraded to the 3 year because of this. Thank you to the whole Fangraphs team!
One feature that would be helpful, being able to favorite/bookmark articles. There have been some over the years that I go back and search for. Like one on Luis Arraez hitting the ball too hard, or how to contextualize prospect grades, Like 60 power = x estimated home runs.
It would be helpful for a quick way to go back to those via a favoriting/bookmark tool
Is there an option that brings back Dayn and Carson?
and Kiley, Jeff, and Eno?
Just updated to 3 year. Thanks for all the great work you and your team provide.