Andrés Giménez Is the Latest Guardian to Sign a Long-Term Extension

Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Last year, Andrés Giménez enjoyed quite a breakout season, helping to lessen the sting of the Francisco Lindor trade by emerging as one of the top second basemen in the game. He made his first All-Star team, won his first Gold Glove, and helped the Guardians win the AL Central for the first time since 2018. Now, the team has guaranteed that he’ll stick around for a good long while. On Tuesday, ESPN’s Jeff Passan reported that Giménez has agreed to terms on a seven-year, $106.5 million extension that also includes an option for an eighth season.

The full details of the contract have not yet been reported, but the deal appears to cover the 2023-29 seasons, with a $4 million signing bonus and a $23 million club option for 2030 that comes with a $2.5 million buyout. Via as-yet-unspecified escalators, that option can increase to $24 million (note that Passan has reported the option year as 2031, meaning that the guaranteed portion of the deal wouldn’t begin until next season). At its maximum, the extension could pay Giménez $128 million over eight years, his ages 24-31 seasons.

The guaranteed portion of the contract is the second-largest in team history after José Ramírez’s five-year, $124 million extension signed last year. The extension is the latest manifestation of what has practically become a Cleveland tradition, one that traces back to the rebirth of the franchise. In the mid-1990s, general manager John Hart pioneered the practice of signing young stars such as Sandy Alomar Jr., Carlos Baerga, Manny Ramirez, Jim Thome, and Omar Vizquel to extensions that ran through at least some of their arbitration years and kept them in the fold when they would have hit free agency. It’s a strategy that enabled the team to save millions of dollars while maintaining a competitive nucleus, and one that has become popular with several other teams, most notably the Braves (for whom Hart served as president of baseball operations from late 2014 to late ’17). Long after Hart left Cleveland, successors Mark Shapiro and Chris Antonetti continued to sign players such as Ramírez, Michael Brantley, Travis Hafner, Jason Kipnis, Corey Kluber, Carlos Santana, and Grady Sizemore to deals along those lines.

That’s an incomplete list of players who went this route, but it never included Lindor, who went year-to-year during his arbitration years until the team decided it couldn’t afford him at a full market price. On January 7, 2021, Lindor and Carlos Carrasco were traded to the Mets in exchange for the then-22-year-old Giménez, shortstop Amed Rosario, outfielder Isaiah Greene and righty Josh Wolf.

Giménez had hit an impressive .263/.333/.398 (105 wRC+) in 49 games with the Mets during the pandemic-shortened 2020 season, but he struggled in his first year with Cleveland, batting .218/.282/.351 (74 RC+) in 68 games sandwiched around a detour to Triple-A Columbus that lasted nearly three months. He did hit much better after returning (.245/.320/.382, 94 wRC+) than before (.179/.226/.308, 43 wRC+) even if he didn’t actually make better contact. As I noted last fall, he held his own after returning despite lacking a consistent approach at the plate. “Last year [2021] he’d deviate after like a bad game,” manager Terry Francona told the Akron Beakon Journal’s Ryan Lewis in May. “You’d have different stance, you have a leg kick you didn’t have, you get a toe-tap.”

Guardians hitting coaches Chris Valaika and Victor Rodriguez helped Giménez ditch the leg kick, which they felt was hindering his pitch recognition and his timing. He fared better against every major pitch type in 2022 than ’21, and overall batted .297/.371/.466 with 17 homers and 20 steals. His 140 wRC+ finished in a virtual tie with Rafael Devers and Carlos Correa for eighth in the AL (one point ahead of Ramírez) and among second basemen of either league trailed only Jose Altuve and Jeff McNeil. On the other side of the ball, Giménez’s 16 DRS, 9 OAA and 6.5 UZR each ranked second among all second basemen, and overall, his 6.1 WAR tied Xander Bogaerts for fifth in the AL, and among second basemen trailed only Altuve. That’s some fine company.

Giménez’s performance included a few areas of concern, notably a 40.8% chase rate, 6.1% walk rate, and Statcast contact numbers (87.8 mph average exit velocity, 6.2% barrel rate, 37.6% hard-hit rate) that placed only in the 29th–36th percentiles. Thanks in part to his 94th-percentile speed, he was nonetheless one of the majors’ most productive hitters on groundballs, ranking among the top half-dozen in both batting average and wRC+:

Most Productive on Groundballs
Player Tm PA AVG SLG wRC+
Harold Ramírez TBR 176 .347 .392 116
Jeff McNeil NYM 195 .338 .400 114
Julio Rodríguez SEA 169 .343 .367 108
Xander Bogaerts BOS 207 .343 .386 103
Andrew Benintendi KCR/NYY 167 .335 .353 94
Andrés Giménez CLE 171 .333 .345 94
Yandy Díaz TBR 206 .306 .350 90
José Ramírez CLE 171 .310 .363 90
Adolis García TEX 174 .316 .351 89
Trea Turner LAD 226 .319 .350 89
Minimum 100 groundballs.

As noted last fall, hitters combined for a .235 AVG and 35 wRC+ on grounders; based on that, Giménez netted an extra 17 hits, without which he’d have finished with a .263 AVG and .433 SLG, much closer to his expected numbers.

While I do wonder about the sustainability of that aspect of his game, in all, that’s a pretty impressive showing for a 23-year-old. In fact, it’s one of the best age-23 seasons of the past decade:

Best Age-23 Seasons, 2013-22
Player Team Season PA HR SB AVG OBP SLG wRC+ BsR Off Def WAR
Mike Trout LAA 2015 682 41 11 .299 .402 .590 171 3.0 58.7 6.6 9.3
Mookie Betts BOS 2016 730 31 26 .318 .363 .534 136 10.6 41.8 13.0 8.2
Cody Bellinger LAD 2019 660 47 15 .305 .406 .629 161 1.4 54.2 4.5 7.7
Manny Machado BAL 2016 696 37 0 .294 .343 .533 131 0.1 25.7 11.4 6.2
Kris Bryant CHC 2015 650 26 13 .275 .369 .488 136 6.9 33.8 3.6 6.1
Francisco Lindor CLE 2017 723 33 15 .273 .337 .505 116 4.7 19.4 17.7 6.1
Andres Giménez CLE 2022 557 17 20 .297 .371 .466 140 3.4 28.3 12.0 6.1
Yasiel Puig LAD 2014 640 16 11 .296 .382 .480 148 1.6 36.3 -5.5 5.5
Corey Seager LAD 2017 613 22 4 .295 .375 .479 127 3.4 24.9 8.7 5.4
José Ramírez CLE 2016 618 11 22 .312 .363 .462 119 8.6 22.9 7.4 5.3
Bo Bichette TOR 2021 690 29 25 .298 .343 .484 122 6.9 25.2 2.4 5.1
Freddie Freeman ATL 2013 629 23 1 .319 .396 .501 150 1.5 36.9 -9.5 5.0

Again, fine company even given the presence of a few players who have flamed out; Bellinger and Bryant have both dealt with a series of injuries, while Puig’s decline has been an ugly mixture of on- and off-field issues. The book isn’t closed on any of the above players, but several are Cooperstown bound. It’s worth noting that the two other Cleveland players on the list have turned out quite well, and that Giménez’s 140 wRC+ is actually higher than all of the other non-first base infielders — even those who out-homered him by a significant margin.

Because Giménez spent so long in the minors in 2021, he’s accrued only two years and 106 days of major league service time, 66 short of reaching three full seasons (which would have made him eligible for free agency after the 2025 season) and 22 short of becoming an arbitration-eligible Super Two. Thus, his contract for 2023 was among the 28 the team recently renewed; most of those salaries haven’t even been published yet, but Giménez was only set to make $739,400. The $4 million signing bonus bumps him up to something closer to what a star-caliber player in his first year of arbitration eligibility might make. For example, Bichette, who’s heading into his age-25 season with 3.063 years of service time, is making $2.85 million in salary plus a $3.25 million signing bonus as part of his three-year, $33.6 million extension, while the Padres’ Jake Cronenworth, who has exactly three years of service time, is making $4.225 million coming off back-to-back 4.1-WAR seasons. Had he reached three years, Giménez might be somewhere in that ballpark.

Via Dan Szymborski, here’s Giménez’s projection through 2030, the year with the club option:

ZiPS Projection – Andrés Giménez
Year Age BA OBP SLG AB H HR SO SB OPS+ WAR $ $Arb
2023 24 .266 .336 .416 515 137 15 119 20 108 4.4 $36.9 $0.7
2024 25 .265 .336 .420 517 137 16 115 19 109 4.5 $39.6 $7.9
2025 26 .264 .338 .419 515 136 16 112 18 110 4.5 $42.1 $14.7
2026 27 .260 .334 .416 515 134 16 109 16 108 4.0 $38.5 $17.4
2027 28 .257 .333 .409 514 132 16 106 15 105 3.6 $35.5
2028 29 .255 .333 .407 513 131 16 105 13 105 3.2 $32.9
2029 30 .255 .333 .407 513 131 16 106 12 105 2.9 $30.4
2030 31 .257 .334 .409 513 132 16 106 11 106 2.8 $31.3

Even with some regression to 4.5 WAR per year at his peak, the ZiPS contract projection for Giménez if he were a free agent comes to a whopping $287.2 million, which is more than Bogaerts received from the Padres as a 30-year-old free agent (and spread out over 11 years, at that). Even with the expected discounts for his arbitration years, Giménez projects to be worth $139.5 million through 2029, and $170.8 million through ’30; through that lens, this looks like a rather club-friendly deal. It’s not an out-and-out steal the way Ramírez’s five-year, $26 million deal for 2017-21 — over which the third baseman produced 28 WAR, made three All-Star teams and finished in the top three in AL MVP voting three times — turned out to be, but it’s clear that Giménez traded some risk for financial security. If he’s still even close to being a three-win player in 2030, he’ll stand to make tens of millions more, though he’s unlikely to approach the windfall he might have reaped if he’d spent all of 2021 in the majors and hit free agency after 2025, his age-26 season.

All of which is to say that this is A Very Guardians Deal, and while we can again bemoan the salary structure that prevents players short of six years of service time from getting anything approaching their full market value, it takes two sides to tango. And we shouldn’t be surprised if at least a couple more extensions follow in short order. Via The Athletic’s Zack Meisel, the team is in “advanced negotiations” with multiple players including Rosario, Triston McKenzie, Steven Kwan, and Trevor Stephan, hoping to complete extensions by Opening Day (Stephan’s is reportedly nearing completion). Meanwhile, Emmanuel Clase (five years, $20 million) and Myles Straw (five years, $25 million) signed such deals last spring, albeit at a scale much smaller than that of Giménez. If some of those extensions come though, they’ll probably increase the team’s payroll — estimated at around $90.7 million even with several of those aforementioned extension candidates’ salaries unknown — by a few million dollars. They’re still likely to rank among the bottom third of the 30 teams, even while contending for another AL Central title or at least a playoff spot. This approach has worked for the Guardians before, and at least in terms of establishing generational wealth for Giménez, it will work for him as well.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jay_jaffe... and BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
1 year ago

This strikes me as such a team-friendly deal that I’m actually a bit surprised Gimenez accepted it, even with the obvious motivation to secure his first huge pile of dollars. That’s a lot of years of prime free agency to give up, especially coming off a monster season. More evidence that preemptive extensions are the way forward for smart front offices.

lavarnway
1 year ago

Considering that he has such a short track record of being good, this deal really makes perfect sense for both parties IMO.

sadtrombonemember
1 year ago

These sorts of deals are win-win, so I would have still offered this deal. But signing a guy to a $105M deal, with incentives up to a $125M deal, when ZiPS suggests a $140M deal…that’s quite good for Giménez. He didn’t have a lot of leverage here.

mopete12member
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Where are you seeing anything about incentives that can increase the deal to $125M? The only incentives I’ve seen mentioned are for increasing the option year amount.