Archive for Chat

Jeff Sullivan FanGraphs Chat — 9/9/14

9:05
Jeff Sullivan: Let’s baseball chat!

9:05
Jeff Sullivan: On today’s menu: baseball, of the real kind!

9:06
Jeff Sullivan: Is there even still fantasy baseball at this point in the season?

9:06
Jeff Sullivan: I might never know!

9:07
Comment From Sam
Since Marcus Stroman has developed his new sinker and is getting an impressive amount of groundballs is he a legit number 2 starter?

9:08
Jeff Sullivan: There’s the usual stuff about having to prove yourself for longer before you can be a legit anything, but I remember being surprised when I found that Stroman’s breaking ball compares well to that of Jose Fernandez/Yu Darvish/Corey Kluber. So that made me particularly curious, and while Stroman doesn’t throw that pitch very much, I like his overall profile quite a bit. Remember the height questions? I always hate the height questions.

Read the rest of this entry »


Dan Szymborski FanGraphs Chat – 9/8/14

11:44
Dan Szymborski: Firing this up a little early, but it doesn’t “really” start until noon. Need a little time to set up an experiment. No presidents today as a result.

11:54
Dan Szymborski: OK, let’s get ready to rock. As an experiment this week, I’m streaming this on twitch.tv as well, with voice and music (and you can ask questions there too)

11:54
Dan Szymborski: Twitch.tv/zimsmash

11:55
Comment From CuriousGeorge
“In FanGraphs’ version of WAR, a home run-robbing catch with two outs in the ninth inning of a one-run game counts the exact same as a catch 5 feet in front of the fence in the fifth inning of a game in which the outfielder’s team trails 11-0.” that is from the jeff passan article that is putting down war. what are you thoughts on that statement?

11:56
Dan Szymborski: Jeff makes some good points (as does Ol’ Dave) but I think that situational stuff in this way doesn’t enhance WAR, it simply adds a bunch of team information into a player stat.

11:57
Dan Szymborski: Now, if we had a reason to think that players at the MLB level had significantly different abilities in this situation that would be different, but we don’t

Read the rest of this entry »


Nicholas Minnix Baseball Chat – 9/5/14

12:12
Nicholas Minnix: Hello, folks, sorry for the delay, but ready to roll!

12:14
Comment From Guest
Brandon Finnegan upside ROS?

12:15
Nicholas Minnix: I like the player, in fantasy leagues, unless it’s a holds league, there doesn’t seem to be much value beyond a little chipping away at ERA and WHIP, some extra K’s (which he can produce, surely). He won’t get a start, surely.

12:15
Comment From Kevin Towers
$@#$!! $@#$!! wusses @#$@#$! %$@#%ing #$@#!!!!!!

12:15
Nicholas Minnix: Haha, you seem to have captured that well.

12:15
Comment From Bluesox
What do you think is the source of the current slump in Oakland?

Read the rest of this entry »


Eno Sarris Baseball Chat — 9/4/14

11:51
SublimeVEVO:

11:51
Eno Sarris: see you in ten

12:01
Comment From Ryan
Are you drunk…like right now?

12:01
Eno Sarris: Haha 9am West Coast time. I’m a derelict, but not that much of one.

12:01
Comment From Bobby Blownilla
Just lost Starlin for the year. In first place and HR/RBI most needed categories. Replace him with Alicedes, Mercer, or B. Crawford? All are on roster and fairly interchangeable. Not much else on wire. thanks!

12:02
Eno Sarris: If you have them all on the roster, play Mercer against lefties, Alcides the rest of the time and drop Crawford lol.

Read the rest of this entry »


Neil Weinberg FanGraphs Q&A – 9/3/14

2:05
Neil Weinberg: Hey all, happy Wednesday. I’ll be here at 3pm to chat about baseball and baseball stats. This means questions about sabermetrics, our data, and related FG-centered concepts are strongly encouraged.

Other things are welcome too, but as usual, I’m not good at fantasy and prospect stuff, so ask at your own risk.

I’m @NeilWeinberg44 on Twitter, so follow me there and ask me questions at other times too. I’ll hang til 4pm for sure, and until 5pm if you ask lots of questions.

3:00
Comment From Hunter
How do you think teams like the A’s quantify chemistry? How much of an impact do you think it has in wins?

3:02
Neil Weinberg: I don’t know. I’ve heard all sorts of ideas. I’m not really sure how to go about doing it. I think it probably makes a difference, maybe something like 0-5 wins per season? But we’re talking about all of those wins spread across 25+ players. I would imagine players do better when they are happy and good chemistry makes them happy. How to measure that? No idea. I won’t even pretend to suggest we could do it from the outside in any way

3:02
Comment From A Concerned Reader
Where’s Dave? Is he okay?

3:02
Neil Weinberg: Dave’s on vacation!

3:03
Neil Weinberg: Which is good for Dave and will finally give me a chance to get more chat views than he does! Although Kiley probably crushed me.

Read the rest of this entry »


Kiley McDaniel FanGraphs Chat – 9/3/14

12:00
Kiley McDaniel: So this is my first FG chat and I have nothing snappy to say at the beginning. Everyone lower your expectations accordingly.

12:01
Comment From Bret
Hey Kiley – do the Jays have anything in Kendall Graveman?

12:03
Kiley McDaniel: Eh, kinda. I saw him about a month ago for Dunedin and he was 88-92, touch 93 with plus life, above average changeup with no usable breaking ball, but some feel and an okay cutter. A swing guy/spot start type for now but was never supposed to be this good.

12:04
Comment From Ringtone Composer
Welcom, Kiley! What’s your specialty?

12:04
Kiley McDaniel: Off color jokes that I never publish on the internet, rap references and really dry scouting reports!

12:04
Comment From The Oriole Bird
who was your favorite player you ever scouted?

Read the rest of this entry »


FanGraphs After Dark Chat – 9/2/14

5:37
Paul Swydan: Hi everybody!

5:38
Paul Swydan: I’ll be here at 9 pm ET to chat. There are some fun polls already up. See you soon!

9:01
Paul Swydan: Hi guys, how’s everyone doing tonight?

I think I’m flying solo tonight, so let’s get to it!

9:02
Comment From Ryan
So if Verlander has a bad outing tomorrow, which headline do you like more: “Indians Expose Verlander” or “Junk Baller: Verlander Looks Poor on the Mound, Too”?

9:03
Paul Swydan: Expose is probably the only one of the two that would actually fly, and even that is iffy.

9:03
Paul Swydan: But you’re thinking. I like that.

Read the rest of this entry »


Jeff Sullivan FanGraphs Chat — 9/2/14

9:05
Jeff Sullivan: here is a video of a volcano https://www.youtube.com/wat…

9:05
Jeff Sullivan: Let’s chat about baseball! Let’s not chat about fantasy baseball.

9:06
Jeff Sullivan: As a word of warning, I was completely out of touch over the weekend, so good luck getting an insightful answer on anything that’s happened extremely recently. One can catch up only so much

9:06
Comment From Alex
Favorites from the NL, AL?

9:06
Jeff Sullivan: A’s and Nationals

9:07
Jeff Sullivan: Still think of the A’s as the best team in the AL, but now I highly doubt they’re catching the Angels in the division, so that makes things complicated

Read the rest of this entry »


Nicholas Minnix Baseball Chat – 8/29/14

11:39
Nicholas Minnix: Hello, folks! Hope you’re doing well. I’ll be with you at the top of the hour.

12:01
Comment From Tom
Votto droppable in an eight-team league?

12:01
Nicholas Minnix: Yes. But you waited this long! 😀

12:02
Comment From Vic
Does Syndergaard deserve some Sept starts?

12:02
Nicholas Minnix: Deserve is a heavy word. Don’t think it’d hurt to give him one or two.

12:03
Comment From Guest
You ok with starting Peavey and Lackey this weekend?

Read the rest of this entry »


Eno Sarris Baseball Chat — 8/28/14

11:47
Eno Sarris: I’ll be here a the top of the hour

11:47
grahambop:

12:01
Comment From John Stamos
SWING

12:01
Eno Sarris: well maybe around 40% of the time.

12:01
Comment From Chad
Do you expect the Cubs to become players for Giancarlo this offseason? Almora, Edwards, McKinney, and a 4th, maybe a lower level arm anywhere close enough for the Marlins to agree?

12:03
Eno Sarris: When I tried to put together a package that equaled Stanton’s surplus value last year, it needed to be a top-10, a top-25 and another top 100 or two. I don’t think that satisfies the requirements, but he does have one less (fewer?) year of control.

Read the rest of this entry »