No, the Mets Do Not Have a Good Designated Hitter Situation
Last week, I discussed the significant disadvantage NL teams will have if the universal designated hitter is adopted for this season and NL teams were then forced to compete with AL teams for playoff spots. I did the best I could to estimated which players might be the greatest beneficiaries of playing time and then looked at how their teams might be impacted. One team jumped out in a negative way — the Mets finished dead last, receiving no benefit at all from Dominic Smith’s increased playing time at designated hitter. I did note that putting Yoenis Céspedes at the designated hitter spot would put the Mets in the middle of the pack in the NL, though that’s still hardly what one might consider a good situation. Still, it’s probably worth a deeper look.
Before we start moving playing time around to potentially maximize designated hitter production for the Mets, let’s take a look at the team’s projections. Below is every player projected to take at least 100 plate appearances in the field (over a full season), how those players project in their expected playing time, and their projections based on 600 plate appearances. Note that the fielding column is at their position and a positional adjustment has not been applied; only their time in the field is accounted for:
Name | PA | wRC+ | WAR | WAR/600 PA |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jeff McNeil | 616 | 119 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Pete Alonso | 658 | 131 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Michael Conforto | 560 | 124 | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Amed Rosario | 644 | 95 | 2.2 | 2.0 |
Brandon Nimmo | 497 | 110 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
Wilson Ramos | 422 | 102 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
J.D. Davis | 504 | 108 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
Robinson Canó | 504 | 98 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
Yoenis Céspedes | 238 | 110 | 0.8 | 2.0 |
Jake Marisnick | 238 | 80 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
Jed Lowrie | 105 | 90 | 0.2 | 1.1 |
Dominic Smith | 168 | 92 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
Tomás Nido | 166 | 61 | 0.1 | 0.4 |