The Angels are in a rough place. With Mike Trout injured, Shohei Ohtani departed, and pitchers like Patrick Sandoval and Reid Detmers injured or struggling, it’s no surprise that they’re on pace for another 90-loss season despite a recent six-game winning streak. Their main source of their woes has been their long-struggling pitching staff, which this year has the third-worst ERA and walk rate in the majors. And while the Angels have taken extreme measures to add pitching depth to their farm system, the next generation of young pitchers in Anaheim aren’t exactly aces. This is to say that any short-term improvements to the staff will have to come from improvements to hurlers already on the big league roster. This year, they’re attempting to do just that by embracing the newest pitch to come into vogue: the splinker.

The splinker is still pretty new in the timeline of pitch design; its early adopters include Jhoan Duran and Paul Skenes. This sinker-splitter hybrid is difficult to classify because so few pitchers throw it, but such offerings generally sit in the same velocity band as four-seam fastballs while killing spin and lift in a manner similar to splitters and changeups. The end result can be downright nasty: Skenes has accumulated a +10 run value with his splinker across just nine starts, only a couple runs better than the first Angel to pick up the pitch, José Soriano. Read the rest of this entry »

For the past two-plus years, the Phillies have been one of the most successful teams in baseball. They’ve been to the World Series once and nearly made it back again last year. They’re sixth in the league in wins over that span and are within hailing distance of everyone other than the Dodgers and Braves. They have the best record in baseball this year, and it’s hardly smoke and mirrors; they’re playing .655 baseball with the run differential of a .654 team.

How do they do it? Their approach is strikingly simple. First, get a group of good pitchers. Zack Wheeler and Aaron Nola form one of the best duos in the majors. Ranger Suárez is underrated, though less so after a banner first half. Cristopher Sánchez has been a revelation. The bullpen has been elite for this entire run. Simply put, the team doesn’t allow many runs.

The second part of Philadelphia’s winning formula is to have some burly power hitters smash dingers. Kyle Schwarber has hit 110 homers since the start of 2022, second only to Aaron Judge. Bryce Harper has missed time with injury, but he’s been one of the best in the game when healthy. The rest of Philadelphia’s attack is a bunch of complementary pieces (maybe that sells Trea Turner short, but I’m working an angle here) meant to help the boppers out.

Over the next few weeks, that proven formula is going to be severely tested. Last Thursday night, both Harper and Schwarber sustained fluke injuries. First, Schwarber planted awkwardly on a throw from the outfield and strained his groin. Calling it a fluke might not go far enough – this was only his third time in the field this year, as he usually handles DH duties. It wasn’t a contact injury, just an awkward step on a routine play.

Schwarber departed the game in the eighth inning. In the ninth, Harper grounded out to end the game. He felt his hamstring tighten up as he ran to first base. He was diagnosed with a strained hamstring, and both he and Schwarber hit the IL before the next day’s games.

First, the bad news. The Phillies are going to have to make the approach they’ve used to such good effect work without one of its key components. Harper and Schwarber have both been instrumental to Philadelphia’s recent run of success. This year, they’ve been the team’s best two hitters, give or take Turner’s abbreviated season. They’ve contributed 37 homers and an aggregate 150 wRC+. They’ve been worth 5.7 WAR, and that despite the positional adjustments that likely understate the value of first basemen and DHs.

Here’s an easy way to think about how the Phillies will look without their stars: So far this year, they’ve won 55 games and lost 29, a .655 winning percentage. Now, let’s subtract the 5.7 wins between Harper and Schwarber and replacement level, and add those games to the loss column instead. Now they’d be a .587 baseball team. That’s a .068 drop in winning percentage, a significant gap.

That sounds pretty dire, particularly given that Harper and Schwarber don’t occupy roles that are easily replaced. The only other obvious DH on the roster is Nick Castellanos, and he’s no Schwarber. There’s no obvious first base replacement, either – Kody Clemens has played in each of the three games since Harper’s injury, but that’s more by necessity than design. His natural position is second base, and he’s played a utility role in recent years.

While the Phillies pitching staff is almost comically deep, the same can’t be said about their position players. Johan Rojas is back in the lineup as a frequent starter with Castellanos now out of the field, but he had been demoted to Triple-A on the back of a dreadful offensive start. Clemens has been injured himself. David Dahl is getting big at-bats for the team. Whit Merrifield is hitting .193/.273/.289 and will be playing much more to make the various positional permutations work. The Phillies have a 101 wRC+ if you exclude their two injured stars. This went from a fearsome lineup to a middling one overnight.

There’s good news for Philly fans, though. First, neither injury appears to be serious. The Athletic’s Matt Gelb reported that both players could at least theoretically miss the minimum 10 days with their injuries. Manager Rob Thomson said that he thought both players could be back before the All-Star break. Sure, having an average offense instead of a great one is a big problem should their injuries linger and cause them to miss the rest of the season, but if both Harper and Schwarber return on July 8, the team is only looking at six more games without their services. They’ve already gone 2-1 in their three games since the injuries.

Remember that 68-point drop in winning percentage? That comes out to a difference of 0.4 wins over a six-game stretch. Playing without your offensive core is a blow, but baseball is a game driven heavily by randomness. Over six games, it’s hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. No single player matters that much in the short run. No two players do, even.

I think that both Harper and Schwarber will get slightly more time to rest, though, which brings me to my second reason the Phillies don’t need to be excessively worried about these injuries. The All-Star break starts on July 15 and stretches for four days. Leave both players on the IL until then, and they could get a full 20 days to recuperate without missing an excessive number of games. The Phillies will only play six games between July 8 and July 18; it’s a relatively good time to have your best hitters on the shelf.

Will that cost the team another 0.4 wins in expectation? Sure, I suppose, though I think the actual amount is slightly less than that; Clemens appears at least a little better than replacement level to me. More important than exactly how many wins it costs them, though, is their current position in the standings. The Phillies are up eight games on the Braves. We give them an 81.5% chance of winning their division even after accounting for the dip in playing time for Harper and Schwarber. It’s never great to play with a diminished group, but these games don’t have the same import as they would if the team were locked in a tight divisional race.

When you think about it that way, a rest until July 19 starts to make a lot more sense. It’s highly unlikely that missing two hitters for six games will put Philadelphia’s season on a downward trajectory. The real fear here is some kind of injury recurrence. Soft tissue injuries are prone to re-aggravation, and both Harper and Schwarber have battled injuries in the past, though never of this exact type.

Part of the benefit of roaring out to an early divisional lead is that you can take a pragmatic approach to the rest of the year. Harper is notoriously competitive, and I’m sure he wants to come back as soon as is feasible. His return from elbow surgery in 2023 took less than six months, shorter than even the most optimistic recovery timetable predicted. But now is a good time to be prudent, because one week of games isn’t going to change the team’s season, but a month or two without Harper and Schwarber might.

If I were the Phillies, I’d stick to the more conservative recovery timeline regardless of what happens in the next week. If they’re particularly worried about getting caught by the Braves, though, they could always wait to see the outcome of their series in Atlanta this weekend before making any decisions. If they get swept and neither player experiences any setbacks in their injury recovery, maybe plugging Harper and Schwarber in for those last six pre-break games will become an attractive proposition.

Regardless of exactly how they manage things, though, the Phillies are surely breathing a sigh of relief. Without their two anchor hitters, the team really would look different. The success of their model depends on Harper being a superstar and Schwarber providing valuable offensive backing. For a day, that model got washed away and replaced with the unknown. What if one or even both of these strains were serious? What if something tore? It’s hard to imagine how the team would remake itself without these two, but luckily, it appears that we won’t have to find out for more than a few weeks.

Takeya Nakamura is atypical among NPB hitters. The 40-year-old Seibu Lions infielder not only has 478 career home runs — ninth-most in Japan’s top league — he has fanned 2,118 times. Ingloriously, that is the highest strikeout total in Japanese baseball history.

How is the Adam Dunn-like slugger looked upon in a baseball culture that favors contact over power? I asked that question to Toronto Blue Jays southpaw Yusei Kikuchi, who played alongside Nakamura with the Seibu Lions for eight seasons.

“He’s a former teammate of mine and I really respect him as a player and a human being,” said Kikuchi through translator Yusuke Oshima. “There aren’t a lot of hitters with pop over there. I think those kind of players should be more respected in Japan, because it’s natural for home run hitters to strike out a lot. It’s a tradeoff. He’s said that he’s not worried about it. People should be more open-minded when it comes to those things.”

Kikuchi added that there aren’t a lot of hitters like Nakamura in Japan because “coaches over there tend to frown upon striking out a lot.” Moreover, the statistical categories that are valued most are hits, batting average, runs scored, and RBIs. Pitchers are viewed in a traditionally-similar manner. Much as it once was stateside, wins are what matter most. Read the rest of this entry »

A friend of mine is a huge Cleveland Guardians fan, and the other night we were discussing the awards chances for some of their top players. He pitched Emmanuel Clase as a Cy Young candidate — which, side note: Have you seen his ERA and Cleveland’s record when leading after eight innings this year? — but I was more interested in where José Ramírez and Steven Kwan might finish in the MVP race. I pulled up our leaderboards to see where they stood and was greeted with a surprise that had nothing to do with the Guards:

Huh? Josh Smith? The same Josh Smith who batted below the Mendoza Line in each of his first two major league seasons? The one who didn’t get a single postseason plate appearance last year? The one who barely made the Opening Day roster this season? Somehow, yes.

Through the first half of the 2024 campaign, that Josh Smith has been the most productive hitter in a loaded Texas Rangers lineup. Of course, that doesn’t quite capture how great the 26-year-old has been this season — after all, that loaded lineup is hurt and underperforming — but you could shave 25 points off his wRC+ and he’d still be their best hitter. Fortunately, the Yankees included Smith in their 2021 trade for Joey Gallo, so no shaving is required.

More to the point, Smith isn’t just excellent relative to the Rangers’ band of bangless bangers. Rather, his status as a great hitter this season is indisputable. Here’s where Smith ranks among qualified American League batters:

So what’s behind Smith’s surge? The most obvious thing to point to is his stance. According to Shawn McFarland of the Dallas Morning News, Smith changed his setup and load over the offseason while working out at Texas’ Globe Life Field with Seth Conner, the team’s assistant hitting coach. Smith stands more narrow now than he did last year, and he has gone to a “stacked” load — meaning he keeps his head stacked over the center of his body through his swing to the point of contact. The purpose of these adjustments was to cut down on strikeouts and fly balls, hit more line drives, and get back to the contact-oriented approach that made him a Top 100 prospect a few years ago.

“I decided to change it because I was hitting like a buck fifty,” Smith told McFarland in April. “That was kind of annoying, so I decided to make some changes.”

His actual batting average last year (.185) wasn’t quite that bad, but regardless, if you want to hike up your average, striking out less and hitting more line drives is a good place to start.

Midway through this season, Smith’s changes have worked as intended. His strikeout rate has dropped from 23.7% last year to 19.2% this year, and his 34.9% fly ball rate is down from last year’s 40.4%. Meanwhile, he’s increased his line drive rate by 10.4 percentage points (25.3%, up from 14.9%). That’s the biggest jump among the 188 players who recorded at least 200 plate appearances in both 2023 and ’24:

Smith has said that in his first two seasons, he got caught up in the push for power. He was chasing fly balls because he thought that was the way to stick in the big leagues. In some ways, he achieved what he was going for last year: He dramatically increased his barrel rate (10.5%, up from 2.4% in 2022) and his average exit velocity (88.5 mph, up from 87.0). And last year was an improvement at the plate from his woeful rookie campaign, but that’s like saying the 1963 Mets were better than the ’62 Mets — they were better, but only because they couldn’t get any worse:

During the offseason, in the afterglow of winning the World Series, Smith concluded that he wasn’t going to cut it as a slugger. At 5-foot-10 and 172 pounds, he couldn’t generate enough power to make his 2023 approach worthwhile. So he started working out with Conner and the early returns were promising, as Smith had a good spring training (154 wRC+ in 49 plate appearances). He made the Opening Day roster mainly because of his positional versatility, but he was a backup and playing time wasn’t guaranteed.

That is, until third baseman Josh Jung broke his wrist in the fourth game of the season, requiring surgery. Smith replaced him as the strong side of a platoon but quickly hit his way into the everyday lineup. Beginning with his first start on April 2 through the end of that month, Smith hit .321/.415/.506 across 94 plate appearances, good for a 163 wRC+. He hasn’t looked back since, climbing up the batting order and settling into the no. 3 hole. Even with Jung nearing his return to the lineup, manager Bruce Bochy has said Smith has earned a starting role, though where he plays in the field will depend on the day.

Narrowing his stance and stacking his load have helped Smith get into a better position to hit, but being in a good position to hit and actually doing it are two different things. That brings us to the driving force behind Smith’s success: He’s making much better swing decisions.

Inspired by teammate Corey Seager, Smith has started hunting pitches over the heart of the plate. Sounds obvious, right? Swing at the most hittable pitches. Duh! But that’s easier said than done when you’re in the box and trying to gear up for 100-mph heaters while also worrying about nasty breaking pitches. In Seager, Smith saw the benefits of a selectively aggressive approach and realized he’d been overthinking things in the box.

Now he’s stripped hitting down to its most basic elements to such a degree that I’m cringing while typing this because it sounds like I went to the Crash Davis School of Baseball Clichés: Swing at good pitches, don’t try to do too much, hit line drives. But this really is what Smith is doing. Check this out:

Smith has been especially great at hunting first pitches in the Heart Zone:

This season, nestled in the lineup between Seager and Adolis García most games, Smith is seeing first pitches in the Heart Zone at a much higher rate, and when he does, he’s hacking at and ripping them.

There are some questions about the sustainability of Smith’s breakout. He is greatly outperforming his expected stats (.244 xBA, .350 xSLG, .314 xwOBA), and it seems unlikely that pitchers will keep grooving him this many pitches. But, even if a regression is coming, it’s hard to image that Smith will be as bad as he was in his first two seasons. With his new setup and approach, his foundation as a line drive hitter should help him limit his slumps and produce as a solid lineup contributor, if not the surprising offensive force he’s been this season.

There were a few good reasons for me to catch up with Tanner Houck this past week. One is that he has arguably been the best starting pitcher in baseball over the first half of the season. Along with a 2.18 ERA and a 2.20 FIP, the 27-year-old Boston Red Sox right-hander boasts the highest WAR (3.6) among big league hurlers. Another is that I’ve been due to ask him about the pitch he relies on most. Per Statcast, Houck has thrown 41.8% sliders, 30.8% sinkers, 24.8% splitters, and 2.6% cutters.

Back in 2019, when he was pitching in Double-A, Houck was featured here at FanGraphs in an interview that focused on his sinker. Two years later, a second interview explored a developing splitter that, as my colleague Kyle Kishimoto detailed just over a month ago, has become an especially effective weapon. Which brings us to the here and now. Interested in both how Houck’s slider has evolved and how it plays within his three-pitch arsenal, I approached him to get some answers.

———

David Laurila: How does the slider you’re currently throwing differ from the one you had last year?

Tanner Houck: “It’s a different grip, technically. Last year, I was running up the horseshoe a little too much and not getting as much side-to-side action. This year there is a focus of creating more east-to-west, side-to-side movement with the pitch, as well as on prioritizing throwing it more in bigger situations. It’s my best pitch by far, so I’m leveraging it whenever I can in those big moments.” Read the rest of this entry »

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Baltimore Orioles. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as our own observations. This is the fourth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.

A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.

All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here. Read the rest of this entry »

Welcome to another edition of Five Things I Liked (Or Didn’t Like) This Week. The parenthetical part of the title is largely just a nod to Zach Lowe, whose ESPN basketball column inspired this one. He occasionally mentions flaws or foibles holding a particular team or player back, in lovingly GIF’ed up detail. I’m more of a rah-rah type, and plenty of weeks I don’t have a single Didn’t Like in the column at all. This week, though, I can’t help it; mental lapses, baserunning errors, and overall sloppiness are all over the column. That’s not to say I don’t love watching it, because part of what’s fun about baseball is when a theoretically staid game gets messy, but let’s be clear: A lot of these plays are not good plays. We’ve got superstars getting confused, on-field collisions, and absolute howlers. Let’s get started.

1. The Profligate Nationals
The Nats are one of the unheralded fun stories of the baseball season. They’re hanging around .500 and playing like better days are ahead. CJ Abrams and MacKenzie Gore look like franchise mainstays. James Wood, another part of the return from the Juan Soto trade, isn’t far off. Mitchell Parker and Jake Irvin might be mid-rotation starters. Jacob Young is an elite defender. They have plenty of interesting role players, and the whole team plays with reckless and joyful abandon.

That’s particularly true on the basepaths, where the Nats rank third in steals but only 11th in total baserunning value. They’re always angling for how to advance another base, whatever the costs. Sometimes that ends in tears. Read the rest of this entry »

Welcome back to Top of the Order, where every Tuesday and Friday I’ll be starting your baseball day with some news, notes, and thoughts about the game we love.

Winning streaks don’t typically change the course of a team’s season. For example, the Dodgers are probably going to finish first in the NL West no matter how many games they win over the next week or so. The same would be true for the White Sox, just in reverse; they could rip off 10 straight wins and their outlook still would be about as bleak as it gets. And yet, in winning seven games in a row, the Astros have completely altered their trajectory for the rest of the season.

Incidentally, the last Astros loss came against those same abysmal White Sox on June 18, when Chicago rookie Jonathan Cannon was one out away from completing an eventual 2-0 shutout. After that game, Houston’s playoff odds fell to 29.3%, its nadir for the season. Since then, the Astros have won seven straight to pull within 3.5 games of the final AL Wild Card, and their odds to make the postseason are back above 50% for the first time since May 26. Now, entering this weekend’s series against the also-surging Mets at Citi Field, the Astros are just 4.5 games out of first place in the AL West.

It wouldn’t have been the least bit unreasonable to suggest prior to the winning streak that the Astros ought to be sellers at the deadline. Kyle Tucker had just been placed on the IL with a shin contusion that is expected to keep him out of the lineup until July. Cristian Javier and José Urquidy had just undergone Tommy John surgery, ending their seasons and making them non-factors for at least the first half of 2025. Houston had also just released veteran first baseman José Abreu, electing to eat the remainder of his disastrous contract that runs through next season rather than roster him any longer. This was a team that simply looked dead in the water, ravaged by injuries and underperformance and unable to get things going. Oh, how a week changes things.

No Kyle Tucker? No problem. All but four of the 14 batters the Astros have sent to the plate during the streak have posted a wRC+ above 100, with the quartet of Jose Altuve, Yordan Alvarez, Alex Bregman, and Jeremy Peña finally clicking at the same time. Impressively, the offense has caught fire despite homering just six times in the seven-game stretch; instead, Houston’s 20 doubles have kept the line moving.

In addition to the aforementioned Javier and Urquidy, the Astros also have been without Justin Verlander during this stretch, after they placed him on the IL with neck discomfort the day before their winning streak began. Instead, they’ve been forced to lean on a group of mostly unheralded pitchers, and boy have those arms delivered. Hunter Brown has turned his season around by revamping his pitch mix (Robert Orr and Ben Zeidman have a great look at it over at Baseball Prospectus), and Spencer Arrighetti just had the best start of his young career; he allowed three hits and no walks while striking out 10 across seven scoreless innings in Wednesday night’s 7-1 win over the Rockies. Ronel Blanco — Houston’s only pitcher who’s survived the injury bug this year — just keeps rolling right along and looks to be in prime position to make the All-Star team in his first full season, at age 30!

Now that the Astros are firmly on the buy side ahead of the deadline, barring something catastrophic to negate their winning streak over the course of the next month, how will they approach things?

Even with Javier, Urquidy, and J.P. France all out for the year, the Astros have rotation help on the way. Verlander and Luis García are expected back soon, with Lance McCullers Jr. not far behind and rookie Jake Bloss able to help out once he too is off the injured list. Verlander, Valdez, Blanco, McCullers Jr., and García would make for a strong playoff rotation (especially because Arrighetti, Bloss, and Brown will be in reserve). But, understanding that they’ve got other positions of issue, namely first base, why not acquire two Birds with one trade? Yes, I’m saying they should trade with the Blue Jays.

Toronto is on the other side of the coin, with its playoff odds down to 5.1% entering Thursday’s drubbing of the Yankees. Perhaps no team this season has been as disappointing as the Jays, whose best course of action looks like selling and rebuilding for the future.

Ideally, the Astros would take advantage of Toronto’s unexpected woes by trading for first baseman Vladimir Guerrero Jr., who is under club control through the end of next season, while also adding a starting pitcher, though it’s unclear how willing the Blue Jays would be to deal Guerrero. Heck, his trade value alone feels extremely unclear: He’s having a very good year (133 wRC+) but still has infuriating batted ball tendencies, with a grounder rate above 50% and just 10 home runs. Teams will surely line up to acquire Guerrero if he were made available in the hopes that they can optimize his contact. The Astros especially would be drawn in by the thought of Vladito taking aim at the Crawford Boxes, thus giving them their best power threat at first base since Yuli Gurriel clubbed 31 homers in 2019 with the help of the juiced ball.

If we presuppose that the Blue Jays are, in fact, willing to trade Guerrero and retool for 2026 and beyond, knowing he could earn close to $30 million next season in his final year of arbitration, the biggest hangup would be agreeing on a price that the Astros would be comfortable paying, especially considering the state of their farm system. Eric Longenhagen and Travis Ice described their farm as “below average on impact and an average one in terms of depth.” But when you consider the uncertainty surrounding Toronto’s top two prospects — Ricky Tiedemann, who hasn’t been able to stay on the field consistently, and Orelvis Martinez, who was just suspended 80 games for PED usage, halting his development — intriguing, higher-floor prospects just might be what the Jays are seeking. Among the players that Houston could offer are Bloss, Jacob Melton, and Joey Loperfido, who would be left without a spot if the Astros were to add Guerrero.

It’d be valid for the Astros to balk at that price, but what if they took on a steady-if-unspectacular starter like Kevin Gausman, Chris Bassitt, or José Berríos along with Guerrero to tamp down the prospect cost? All three pitchers are good, but also on the wrong side of 30. If the Jays are going the path of retooling anyway, it may behoove them to remove a highly paid starter from their payroll because he probably won’t be around to make an impact on the next good Toronto team anyway. Sure, adding one of these starters would likely push Houston’s payroll to unforeseen heights, but the Astros should be game to take on such a contract if it means getting another solid starter without giving up as much in prospect value.

The Astros are having a weird season and may have a weird future as they move away from the risk-averse front offices of Jeff Luhnow and James Click. So they might as well lean fully into it and take some risky shots that could reap them major rewards.

Baseball is truly a game of goops and gunks. Clubbies prepare pearls with Lena Blackburne Baseball Rubbing Mud. Position players paste their bats with pine tar and pamper their gloves with leather conditioner. Trainers soothe sore muscles with Icy Hot or Tiger Balm, and coaches spray the field with foul streaks of tobacco juice. Between innings, players wolf down caramel-filled stroopwafels specially designed to replenish high-performance athletes while fans slather hot dogs with mustard, ketchup, relish, chili, and blindingly yellow nacho cheese sauce that is, in fact, none of those three things. And of course, pitchers have been known to secret everything from sunscreen to petroleum jelly to Spider Tack on their person. If it defies easy categorization as a solid or a liquid, there’s a place for it at the ballpark.

Rosin sits somewhere in the middle. It’s powdered plant resin that sits on the mound inside not one but two cloth bags, but it doesn’t work its magic in that form. It requires a liquid to coax out its adhesive properties. The only approved liquid is sweat, for which a player might go to their hair or their forearm, but even then, there are limits. David Cone demonstrated the power of rosin after Max Scherzer’s ejection last April. With just a small amount of water and rosin, enough to create only the slightest discoloration on his fingers, Cone could create enough tack to make the baseball defy gravity. Read the rest of this entry »

Back in January, I expressed grave concern over the state and direction of the Washington Nationals. They’d followed their World Series title with four straight last-place finishes, jettisoned most of their good players, and watched a series of prospects flame out. It wasn’t just a matter of waiting for Dylan Crews and James Wood to hit the majors; I argued that Washington needed to build a foundation of strong supporting players. Wood and Crews could be the difference between the Nats winning 80 games a year and 90, but if the infrastructure wasn’t ready, they’d turn a 70-win team into an 80-win team. And at that point, why did we even bother?

I’m pleased to report that the Nationals — no doubt sobered and inspired by my pessimistic appraisal of the situation — have answered the call. They don’t stink anymore. I don’t know if they’re good right now, as 38-41 and fourth place in the division isn’t exactly reminding anyone of the Big Red Machine. But on the journey from cheeks to championships, mediocrity is the first waypoint. Besides, with the NL Wild Card race being what it is, the Nats look like they’re going to be within a couple games of a playoff spot halfway through the season. Read the rest of this entry »