FanGraphs Power Rankings: June 12–18

A bunch of teams have gone streaking up the standings and in these rankings this week, with the Giants making their first appearance in the top five and the Rays taking back the top spot from the Rangers.
A reminder for how these rankings are calculated: first, we take the three most important components of a team — their offense (wRC+), their pitching (a 50/50 blend of FIP- and RA9-, weighted by starter and reliever IP share), and their defense (RAA) — and combine them to create an overall team quality metric. I also add in a factor for “luck,” adjusting a team’s win percentage based on expected win-loss record. The result is a power ranking, which is then presented in tiers below.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rays | 51-24 | 0 | 128 | 80 | 106 | 6 | 160 | 99.2% |
| Rangers | 44-27 | -4 | 121 | 86 | 102 | 9 | 168 | 79.0% |
Neither the Rays or the Rangers had particularly good weeks last week; Tampa Bay split a series with an inspired A’s ballclub and then lost a series to the Padres, and Texas lost a big four-game series to the Angels before bouncing back against the Blue Jays over the weekend. Despite their excellent play this season, neither team has created much separation in their respective division races. The AL East has been competitive all season long, but the Rangers have let the Angels back into the AL West picture with that series loss.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braves | 46-26 | 1 | 119 | 92 | 85 | -8 | 147 | 99.2% |
| Giants | 39-32 | -1 | 108 | 94 | 96 | 8 | 147 | 60.0% |
| Diamondbacks | 43-29 | 5 | 107 | 102 | 99 | 8 | 119 | 68.9% |
After a slow start to the season, the Giants have caught on fire this month, winning 11 of their 15 games in June. They just completed a three-game sweep of the Dodgers over the weekend in which they outscored Los Angeles 29–8, leapfrogging them in the NL West standings. Things have been going so well that Brandon Crawford was finally able to make his debut as a pitcher to close out a blowout win. San Francisco has scored more than six runs per game over the last few weeks, and the pitching staff has continued to be solid. The team will have to navigate injuries to Alex Cobb and Mitch Haniger, though; both of them will be sidelined for the foreseeable future.
The Diamondbacks were slowed down by the red-hot Phillies last week but got back on track with a series win against the Guardians over the weekend. Their recent ups-and-downs have exposed the weaknesses on their roster: they allowed double-digit runs in two of their losses last week, with both games started by Zach Davies, but just 13 runs total in the other four. The pitching staff will need some help if Arizona wants to maintain its lead in the NL West, though the offense seems like it’s firing on all cylinders with Corbin Carroll leading the way. The D-Backs will have to contend with a wonky schedule this week with three games in Milwaukee, a makeup game in Washington on Thursday, and then a cross-country flight to San Francisco for their weekend series.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astros | 39-33 | -2 | 99 | 87 | 91 | 8 | 137 | 53.4% |
| Angels | 41-33 | 2 | 112 | 104 | 95 | -3 | 125 | 46.3% |
| Dodgers | 39-33 | -1 | 111 | 99 | 109 | 2 | 125 | 81.7% |
| Orioles | 44-27 | 5 | 107 | 103 | 86 | -11 | 106 | 60.1% |
| Blue Jays | 39-34 | 1 | 110 | 99 | 94 | -1 | 130 | 55.7% |
| Padres | 35-36 | -3 | 99 | 94 | 85 | 17 | 142 | 58.5% |
After losing their first series of the month to the Astros, the Angels have gone on a rampage, winning four straight series including a big four-game matchup with the Rangers last week. It’s all thanks to Shohei Ohtani, who’s in the midst of a 15-game hitting streak and blasted six home runs last week — and he shut down the high-powered Rangers offense in his lone start. Los Angeles has passed the faltering Astros in the AL West standings and is just 4.5 games back of Texas.
The Padres have been showing some life recently as well, winning both their series last week, including a hard-fought one against the Rays over the weekend. Fernando Tatis Jr. seems to have put his early struggles behind him; he’s collected 24 hits this month, with 15 of them going for extra-bases, all while playing fantastic defense in right field. San Diego will head to San Francisco for a big four-game series to start this week, hoping to slow down the Giants.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariners | 35-35 | -1 | 98 | 93 | 90 | 11 | 130 | 23.6% |
| Yankees | 39-33 | 0 | 96 | 104 | 83 | 3 | 98 | 59.8% |
| Phillies | 38-34 | 3 | 100 | 89 | 101 | -2 | 112 | 48.7% |
| Twins | 36-36 | -4 | 98 | 83 | 90 | -12 | 105 | 69.2% |
| Marlins | 41-31 | 8 | 97 | 93 | 100 | -7 | 82 | 50.7% |
| Red Sox | 37-35 | -1 | 107 | 106 | 95 | -14 | 92 | 20.6% |
| Brewers | 37-34 | 3 | 87 | 97 | 101 | 10 | 90 | 55.7% |
| Cubs | 33-38 | -3 | 100 | 93 | 96 | 5 | 125 | 15.4% |
The Phillies won their sixth straight game on Sunday, taking three of four from the Diamondbacks and sweeping the A’s. The calendar has turned to June, so Kyle Schwarber has started to heat up, but he’s not the only one carrying the load. Nick Castellanos is mashing again, J.T. Realmuto hit for the cycle in Philadelphia’s only loss last week, and Trea Turner finally looks like he’s breaking out of his season-long slump. Back-to-back series against the Braves and Mets this week provide the Phillies with a prime opportunity to move up the standings.
The Marlins’ recent hot streak had a slight hiccup in Seattle last week, but they got right back to their winning ways with a sweep of the Nationals over the weekend. They’re currently the top Wild Card team in the National League and have been one of the most surprising teams in the majors this year. Bryan De La Cruz and Jesús Sánchez have been key contributors after Jazz Chisholm Jr. went down with his toe injury, and Eury Pérez has been solid in his first taste of the big leagues.
The Brewers are barely clinging to their lead in the NL Central, holding off the surging Reds, and did their part to create some separation in the division by sweeping the Pirates over the weekend. Christian Yelich has quietly put together a solid season, though the rest of their lineup has continued to struggle to support him. Their pitching staff, meanwhile, has been decimated by injuries, but they’re getting some surprising contributions from Julio Teheran and Colin Rea, of all pitchers. It feels foolish to think that those reclamation projects will continue to pitch as well as they have, which means the division feels totally up in the air.
| Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reds | 37-35 | 3 | 94 | 113 | 88 | -8 | 65 | 12.5% |
| Pirates | 34-36 | 1 | 98 | 96 | 101 | -3 | 83 | 10.7% |
| Guardians | 33-38 | 0 | 87 | 100 | 88 | 3 | 81 | 24.5% |
| Mets | 33-38 | 0 | 102 | 118 | 106 | -1 | 80 | 26.1% |
| Cardinals | 29-43 | -6 | 106 | 107 | 99 | -7 | 93 | 12.0% |
The Reds would love nothing more than to take advantage of a weak division and sneak into the playoffs a year after kicking off their rebuilding cycle. At this rate, they just might do it. They won their eighth straight game on Sunday, sweeping the Astros in Houston in a very impressive display of their young talent. They’ve won 16 of their last 22 games and have pushed their record over .500 for the first time since 2021.
The Mets have continued to slide down the standings after splitting a two-game, cross-town series with the Yankees and losing two of three to the Cardinals. They haven’t won a series this month and are now 5.5 games out of a playoff spot in the Wild Card race and 12.5 back in their division. Some good news amidst all that: Pete Alonso, who was hit on the wrist with a pitch last weekend, is off the IL after a minimum stay on the shelf.
| Team | Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tigers | 30-40 | 3 | 87 | 110 | 98 | 7 | 62 | 2.3% |
| Nationals | 27-43 | -3 | 93 | 107 | 113 | 0 | 56 | 0.0% |
| White Sox | 31-42 | 0 | 86 | 104 | 114 | -2 | 41 | 6.2% |
| Royals | 19-52 | -5 | 83 | 120 | 105 | 8 | 44 | 0.0% |
| Rockies | 29-45 | 1 | 80 | 123 | 95 | -10 | 28 | 0.0% |
| Athletics | 19-55 | 0 | 89 | 146 | 135 | -6 | 28 | 0.0% |
For a brief moment last week, the Royals had a worse record than the A’s. They snapped a 10-game losing streak on Saturday with a walk-off win against the Angels and slipped ahead of Oakland at the bottom of the standings. Sadly, their best hitter, Vinnie Pasquantino, tore his labrum in his right shoulder and will be sidelined for the rest of the season. With Bobby Witt Jr. struggling in his second season and absolutely no improvement to the pitching staff, the Royals truly are directionless less than a year after firing long-time general manager Dayton Moore.
While the reverse boycott might not have any tangible effect on John Fisher’s attempt to move the A’s to Las Vegas — legislation backing the public financing of a new stadium was finally approved last week — it was a stark reminder of the lively community losing a team in Oakland. And just to press salt in the wounds of those fans, Rob Manfred inserted himself into the story later in the week, reasserting the anti-community, money-first approach to baseball that got Oakland into this mess in the first place.
…
| Rank | Team | Record | “Luck” | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | RAA | Team Quality | Playoff Odds | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rays | 51-24 | 0 | 128 | 80 | 106 | 6 | 160 | 99.2% | 1 |
| 2 | Rangers | 44-27 | -4 | 121 | 86 | 102 | 9 | 168 | 79.0% | -1 |
| 3 | Braves | 46-26 | 1 | 119 | 92 | 85 | -8 | 147 | 99.2% | 0 |
| 4 | Giants | 39-32 | -1 | 108 | 94 | 96 | 8 | 147 | 60.0% | 6 |
| 5 | Diamondbacks | 43-29 | 5 | 107 | 102 | 99 | 8 | 119 | 68.9% | -1 |
| 6 | Astros | 39-33 | -2 | 99 | 87 | 91 | 8 | 137 | 53.4% | 1 |
| 7 | Angels | 41-33 | 2 | 112 | 104 | 95 | -3 | 125 | 46.3% | 1 |
| 8 | Dodgers | 39-33 | -1 | 111 | 99 | 109 | 2 | 125 | 81.7% | -3 |
| 9 | Orioles | 44-27 | 5 | 107 | 103 | 86 | -11 | 106 | 60.1% | 0 |
| 10 | Blue Jays | 39-34 | 1 | 110 | 99 | 94 | -1 | 130 | 55.7% | -4 |
| 11 | Padres | 35-36 | -3 | 99 | 94 | 85 | 17 | 142 | 58.5% | 2 |
| 12 | Mariners | 35-35 | -1 | 98 | 93 | 90 | 11 | 130 | 23.6% | 4 |
| 13 | Yankees | 39-33 | 0 | 96 | 104 | 83 | 3 | 98 | 59.8% | -2 |
| 14 | Phillies | 38-34 | 3 | 100 | 89 | 101 | -2 | 112 | 48.7% | 5 |
| 15 | Twins | 36-36 | -4 | 98 | 83 | 90 | -12 | 105 | 69.2% | -3 |
| 16 | Marlins | 41-31 | 8 | 97 | 93 | 100 | -7 | 82 | 50.7% | -1 |
| 17 | Red Sox | 37-35 | -1 | 107 | 106 | 95 | -14 | 92 | 20.6% | 1 |
| 18 | Brewers | 37-34 | 3 | 87 | 97 | 101 | 10 | 90 | 55.7% | -1 |
| 19 | Cubs | 33-38 | -3 | 100 | 93 | 96 | 5 | 125 | 15.4% | 3 |
| 20 | Reds | 37-35 | 3 | 94 | 113 | 88 | -8 | 65 | 12.5% | 4 |
| 21 | Pirates | 34-36 | 1 | 98 | 96 | 101 | -3 | 83 | 10.7% | -7 |
| 22 | Guardians | 33-38 | 0 | 87 | 100 | 88 | 3 | 81 | 24.5% | -1 |
| 23 | Mets | 33-38 | 0 | 102 | 118 | 106 | -1 | 80 | 26.1% | 0 |
| 24 | Cardinals | 29-43 | -6 | 106 | 107 | 99 | -7 | 93 | 12.0% | -4 |
| 25 | Tigers | 30-40 | 3 | 87 | 110 | 98 | 7 | 62 | 2.3% | 1 |
| 26 | Nationals | 27-43 | -3 | 93 | 107 | 113 | 0 | 56 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 27 | White Sox | 31-42 | 0 | 86 | 104 | 114 | -2 | 41 | 6.2% | -2 |
| 28 | Royals | 19-52 | -5 | 83 | 120 | 105 | 8 | 44 | 0.0% | 1 |
| 29 | Rockies | 29-45 | 1 | 80 | 123 | 95 | -10 | 28 | 0.0% | -1 |
| 30 | Athletics | 19-55 | 0 | 89 | 146 | 135 | -6 | 28 | 0.0% | 0 |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
The Braves went 6-1 last week, made the Rockies look like a joke, and got bumped out of tier 1 🧐
jake must be a phillies or mets fan
Everything is being skewed by the decision, which is frankly inexplicable to me, to make RAA the sole criterion for evaluating team defense. As opposed to, say, the “Def”-composite which is right there on the team leaderboards, just waiting to be carried over into these power rankings. I can also only assume that it is being weighted equally to the other criteria (which would be silly seeing as good hitting and pitching is much more important): how else is the Padres “team quality” 40 points higher than that of the O’s, when the aggregate difference in the other numbers is exactly 0?
Adding onto this, doesn’t the mix of RA9 into the pitching components also effectively include defense already?
Honestly, I agree with the Braves having a below average defensive ranking (though I think it should improve as I think a few players have underperformed true talent, especially Ozzie).
I think that’s undoubtedly right. Also “Luck” would seem to be superfluous as the run differential is already baked into the other stats.
Also no mention of them in the write up, despite them being one of three teams in their tier. It seems like these rankings are arbitrarily strung together by weird stats that barely make any sense.
was this written by a phillies fan? how are the Braves not a top-tier team?
The Braves are a lock to win their division and are on cruise mode right now. It’s not as exciting a topic as this surprise season from the Giants. I don’t know why so many are getting touchy about the lack of mention here. FG writers almost always sing praises about the org when they are brought up, but once their defensive metrics say they’re not a top 2 team, it’s an issue.
I for one would not normally care about the lack of mention. They skip several teams each week.
But it’s interesting to me having a “Power Ranking” which is to my knowledge supposed to incorporate how a team is currently playing, and to seemingly not do that.
The Braves have one of the best records in baseball, a great run diff, are projected for the best run diff RoS and by far the highest World Series odds.
They are dealing with injuries in the starting rotation, but should get Fried back, and the holes in the line up, if you want to call them that, seem to be closing from within.
The defense has been bad, but aside from Riley and Rosario, you should expect a little bounce back as the other struggling players profile as better fielders.
I’m a homer, yes, but is any of this wrong? I see no argument for the Braves outside of Tier 1.
By Zips they are the best team in baseball (you can back that out of the playoff odds). It’s a big gap between the Zips ranking to this one
I think the “Team Quality” stat is the reason why. I haven’t been able to figure out what the formula is for “Team Quality,” though I’ve tried a little bit to reverse engineer it.
Somehow, both the Braves and the Giants have a Team Quality of 147.
Braves 46-26 1 119 92 85 -8 147 99.2%
Giants 39-32 -1 108 94 96 8 147 60.0%
Since the Giants, while hot right now, aren’t in the same tier as the Rays and Rangers, that means the Braves have to be bumped down to Tier 2.
A cursory glance at the rest of the rankings would tell you this isn’t true (e.g. Cubs, 125 TQ, ranked 19, tiered below teams with same/lower TQ score).
The Cubs, at 34-38, are where they belong, even if their pythagorean winning percentage says they should be around 38-34. At some point, a team’s actual record comes into play, rather that its pythagorean winning percentage.
My point is that they don’t group tiers by team quality, so team quality score can’t be the reason (excuse) for ranking them in tier 2 (and does anyone really think the Rangers are better?).
Ok, then they’re grouped lower because of either actual record or (more likely) pythagorean winning percentage.
pythWL
Rays 51-24
Rangers 49-23
Braves 45-27
Giants 41-31
Diamondbacks 40-33
The Rangers aren’t unlucky. Their gaudy run differential owes 58 runs to the Royals and Athletics. They’re a good team with a very good lineup and a good starting rotation. But their actual record is 45-27 because they have a leaky pen.
Well, they fell from tier 1 to tier 2 in a week where they went 6-1 and heavily outscores their opponents, so that doesn’t really add up either.
I’m a Phillies fan, and i feel the Braves should be in the first tier between TB and TEX. There’s no way he’s a Phillies fan, becuase they just had a great week, and they’re in the pack a full tier behind SD. That makes no sense to me. They’re ahead of SD in the actual standings, they while nobody says they’re catching the Braves, they’re CLOSER to catching the Braves than SD is to catching the Padres. Plus, the Padres have two division opponents ahead of them just in the wild card race. At some point, the actual results have to outweigh the projections, no? SD is a full 10% higher in playoff odds, how?
OK, so this is an exercise not a pronouncement, i get it. But a Phillies fan doesn’t feel that this set of rankings skews towards them at all.
I don’t get how the Cardinals still get an above-average (if only barely) mark for their bullpen. Out of guys who have made more than 6 appearances, they only have 2 relievers with an ERA under 4.00, and one of them is currently on the IL. Even among those two decent relievers, the lowest ERA is only 3.24 (by the guy on the IL). The bullpen has actually become worse than the starting rotation now!
Meanwhile, why is Romero down in AAA right now while Woodford and Cabrera have options remaining and are pitching terribly?
Major league average ERA is 4.28.
AL average ERA is 4.20.
NL average ERA is 4.36.
Together, St. Louis relievers ERA is 4.11, with a 3.83 FIP.
ERA sees them as the 19th best relief core.
FIP sees them as the 7th best relief core.
The Reds should be ranked higher. They are for real. Matt McLain, Elly de la Cruz, Spencer Steer, Jonathan India, and off righties they have TJ Freidl and Jake Fraley. Hunter Greene & Nick Lodolo when he comes back with Ben Lively And an elite closer in Alexis Diaz. Encarnaction-Stroud coming soon. And I’m not counting Votto or Stephenson. I’m not a Reds fan but that is a large # of good players.
Only a blind man can’t see that the Reds are charging into the mix in the NL Central and might already be the favorite. De La Cruz, McLain and Steer are quite an addition but where are the articles about Andrew Abbott. He is the one of the biggest stories of the season.
As a Reds fan, the reason we aren’t ranked higher is – in my opinion – because of the lack of pitching. I love our offense, but we’re playing way over our heads. The bullpen is probably going to get burned out soon. Lodolo isn’t coming back for a bit, Greene just hit the IL, who knows what is up with Ashcraft, Lively will probably return to Earth after teams have seen him the first time, and that all means we’re going to have a win a lot of 9-8 games to stay in the race. And I’m sure we’ll win some of them, but will we win enough of them? My heart hopes that we do, but my head is not sure that we will until we get more pitching.
We here in New England have a group of people known as The Fraternity of the Miserable who, while claiming to be Red Sox fans, never say anything positive about the team. I find your comment surprisingly tilted in that direction. Where is your enthusiasm which should be welling from every pore? Why isn’t there a mention of Abbott who has not been touched this season by anybody, in any leagu?. You already have seen Steer, McLain and De La Cruz emerge has potential stars and Encarnacion-Strand is waiting to add something that might be very special very soon. Your team is already in 1st place and The Little Sisters of the Poor are all that is standing in the way. “Come On Man” Get with it!
“Never say anything positive about the team.”
You can extrapolate my entire commenting history on the Reds from one single comment in one single Power Rankings thread? That’s impressive.
I’m as big a fan of Andrew Abbott as anyone out there. But one decent/healthy starting pitcher isn’t good enough to make the playoffs & I hope the Reds powers that be are buying more pitching. Obviously I want the Reds to win! Being honest about the obstacles to that happening isn’t a bad thing.
I guess I was surprised that you, as a fan, who has obviously gone through some tough years, a token appearance in the 2020 fiasco barely counts, wouldn’t be jumping on the bandwagon and banging on the drums for all to hear. Your team has holes but the competition looks like swiss cheese and while this team is only beginning to come together it would seem appropriate to look forward to several years of rooting for a potentially very good team.
Nothing I have said in any way shape or form means that I’m not on the Reds bandwagon wanting them to win games. I want the management of the Reds to acquire better pitching so that the Reds can, as a result of doing that, win many more games. Ideally, as many games as possible!
I hope the Reds will win at least back-to-back World Series titles. Heck, I hope they win three. Let’s do better than the Big Red Machine. I hope Elly De La Cruz has a better career than Joey Votto. I hope Andrew Abbott has a better career than Greg Maddux. I hope the clouds open up and God appears to Shohei Ohtani and tells him to demand a trade to the Reds.
Every fanbase has a group of people who are always miserable and complaining. The above comment seems pretty reasonable. Bad pitching will catch up to you and the Reds have a lot of it. They may still win the division and it will be a fun story for the rest of baseball, but it’s not a guarantee and it’s reasonable to recognize why.
Perhaps I find the fact that this Reds fan is only thinking about this season a bit surprising. How many Reds fans expected the team to be in 1st place on June 20th? This is a bonus and anything that comes of it is nothing but an appetizer, whether it is shrimp or crackers and cheese. The Reds are a very competitive team as it stands now and the future couldn’t be much brighter.
Tons of hype w the team. Votto coming out super aggressive. I wouldn’t say that Stephenson is a lost cause.
This is a lot more than hype. This is performance on the field. Will there be downs along with this exciting up, of course, but I can’t recall many times in which a team added several possible game changers in such a sort period of time. Steer, McLain, de la Cruz and Abbott with Encarnacion-Strand waiting to show what he can do. Every once in a while a player comes along who changes the entire dynamic of a team, in any sport, Tom Brady, Wayne Gretzky, Bill Russell and this year we have already seen Corbin Carroll transform the D’Backs, but what Elly de la Cruz has done for the Reds.is undeniable. That 13-2 record since he was called up, while certainly unsustainable, is not a mirage. He changes the game, by a lot, in every conceivable way. This is a train that is just starting to roll and I will not be surprised if the Reds walk away with the NL Central.
[NOTE: The following is 100% sincere, and not at all intentionally silly and over-the-top, and thus deserves many downvotes and angry replies informing me that I’m a stupid, idiot dumbhead.]
It’s always a little bit funny to me when people complain that their team isn’t high enough in these kinds of Very Important rankings that will go on your permanent record, and I admit I find it extra-funny and schadenfreude-y when such complaints come from fans of Atlanta Baseball Team. However, I would never mockingly tell Atlanta fans to “cry more” about being ranked one spot too low (or about my choosing not to use the team’s official nickname), because I’m just not that kind of person.
On the other hand, as a Mets fan (obviously), I’d like to complain that the Metropolitans are ranked way too high, and would love to understand the math that calculates their playoff odds at 26% (and whether this math can be used to calculate my credit score). They had a good series opener Monday night against the Astros, but sometimes bad teams have good games against good teams. I’m confident that the rest of the series will feature the Mets’ blowing a huge lead, getting blown out altogether, and/or getting completely shut down in a 1-0/2-1 game. They’re not going to turn things around, and they should sell at the deadline—but they won’t. They’ll similarly be bad again next year (the free agent pitching class is weak, as are their internal options), and they should at least consider tearing it all down and rebuilding (they could probably get a decent pitching prospect for Alonso)—but they won’t. I root for the Mets because I hate myself, and I hate myself because I root for the Mets (and for all the other reasons people hate themselves). Perhaps I should cry more.
I look at that team and wonder how they rebuild in a way that doesn’t make them go away for a good decade. They put all their chips in on old guys, and their farm is in terrible shape. At least they have an owner who cares, unlike the Nats
Where were all these Oakland fans over the last 12 years?
Where are all the Tampa Bay fans now? They have had the best team in baseball this year and are 23rd in attendance.
I can’t believe those A’s fans don’t come out and support that team that has been stripped to the bone! Hell, if they send a couple more pitchers away then I think I’m due up to start. (Trust me, no one wants to see that.)
Even if I were a fan I would not pay to see this current incarnation of the A’s and give any of my money to a sorry owner who is trying their best to bolt town at the earliest opportunity and doesn’t even pretend to want to field a competitive team in the meantime.
Tampa could use some more support, but there are several factors at play there – that stadium is a pain in the ass to get to and is also an unsightly concrete dump. Plus, Florida has a lot of snowbirds and retirees and fewer lifelong locals. All that said, it would be nice to see a consistently good team be better supported.
The Athletics made the playoffs 6 of the last 12 years. Fans still didn’t come.
It’s almost like team performance isn’t the only factor for fan attendance. Weird.
What factor is larger?
Oakland had 1,670,734 fans in attendance in 2019, when they went 97-65 and got an AL wild card spot. That was good for 23rd in MLB.
2018 – 26th – 1,573,616 (ALWC)
2017 – 29th – 1,475,721
2016 – 29th – 1,521,506
2015 – 26th – 1,768,175
2014 – 24th – 2,003,628 (ALWC)
2013 – 23rd – 1,809,302 (ALDS)
2012 – 27th – 1,679,013 (ALDS)
2011 – 30th – 1,476,791
They regularly drew over 2 million in attendance during the Moneyball era (2001-2005). Their highest attendance, 2,900,217, was in 1990, the year after they won the World Series. When the team has been good, people come to see them play.
The Coliseum is a historic 57-year old stadium, and the A’s should have had a new ballpark two decades ago.
Your data supports my argument, not yours.
You ever go to a game in the Coliseum? It’s a crappy place to see a game compared to most ballparks. Quite literally the only reason to go to a game at the Coliseum is the team on the field, because you’re certainly not hanging around for the ambience.
With the Oakland A’s, you’ve got a high likelihood of:
a. the team on the field stinking,
b. sewage backing up in the stadium,
c. shitty ownership,
All of which smells like poop, driving people away from A’s games.
Again, your stats show a bunch of winning teams that had the 25-29th best attendance in the league. Blame the field all you want, but those fans sure didn’t seem to mind the “shit” over the last month, did they?
“but those fans sure didn’t seem to mind the “shit” over the last month, did they?”
Are you referring to the one-game protest that was well attended? Other than that, yes, the fans have very much minded the shit of both the literal and figurative variety that the stadium has contained.
I am looking forward to articles about Patrick Bailey and Luis Matos in, hopefully, the coming weeks 🙂
I enjoy these kind of exercises. Every site does them, and they’re all fun reads. Not as fun as reading the comments sections, though. Fans taking offense at where some writer ranks their team in-season is the height of insanity. Amusing, but insane.
Life or death. Signifying nothing.
The Marlins have a better record than 10! teams ahead of them.
10! = 3,628,800 teams ahead of them 😀