FanGraphs Power Rankings: Spring Training 2024 Edition

It’s been a long offseason, one that has felt all the more drawn out because a number of high-profile free agents, including three of the top five in our rankings, remain unsigned. But spring training has begun in earnest and the thwack of baseballs hitting gloves has started to punctuate the air in Arizona and Florida. These power rankings give us a snapshot of where each team stands, though a lot could change between now and Opening Day.
A reminder for how these rankings are calculated: first, we take the most important components of a team — its offense (wRC+) and its pitching (a 50/50 blend of FIP- and RA9-, weighted by starter and reliever IP share) — and combine them to create an overall team quality metric. I’ve removed defense from the calculations during the offseason since defensive projections aren’t the most reliable. For these offseason power rankings, I’ve used each team’s projected stats based on their Depth Charts projections, which now include both the 2024 ZiPS projections and the 2024 Steamer projections. The result is a power ranking, presented in tiers below.
| Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braves | 97-65 | 114 | 88 | 92 | 200 |
| Dodgers | 92-70 | 111 | 94 | 101 | 168 |
| Astros | 90-72 | 111 | 97 | 97 | 169 |
The Braves spent a lot of effort this offseason solidifying their place atop the NL pecking order. With an already strong roster, they were surprisingly busy this winter, making nine different trades, the majority of which looked more like an accounting ledger than a major league transaction record. In the end, they bolstered their pitching staff by adding Chris Sale and a handful of bullpen arms and filled the lone hole in their lineup with the mercurial Jarred Kelenic. They’re projected to win five more games than the Dodgers and should have no trouble running the table in the NL East again this year.
The Dodgers did all they could this offseason to try and topple the Braves from the top of the projected standings, signing two Japanese superstars, trading for Tyler Glasnow, and re-signing their franchise talisman. Despite all the money they’ve spent on revitalizing their once-depleted starting rotation, there’s still plenty of risk dragging their projection down. Their talent is undeniable, but it’s unclear how much of it will be healthy and available for the entire season.
The Astros remain the class of the American League despite a pretty quiet offseason. They addressed their biggest pitching need last summer when they reacquired Justin Verlander, though it remains to be seen how long he can fight off Father Time. Houston’s one big addition this offseason was to bring in Josh Hader to strengthen an already elite bullpen and help shorten games even further. The Astros also signed Jose Altuve, the face of their franchise, to a five-year extension that should keep him in Houston through the end of his career. With the rest of the AL playoff picture looking very crowded right now, the Astros stand above the fray as preseason favorites.
| Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yankees | 89-73 | 111 | 98 | 100 | 145 |
| Rays | 86-76 | 106 | 99 | 98 | 141 |
| Twins | 84-78 | 102 | 96 | 95 | 143 |
| Blue Jays | 84-78 | 104 | 98 | 97 | 141 |
| Mariners | 86-76 | 102 | 95 | 99 | 134 |
| Orioles | 86-76 | 106 | 97 | 102 | 133 |
This tier really exposes the stark differences between the top teams in the American League versus that same group in the National League, which is not represented here. Even though the Astros are listed in the tier above, all six of the teams in this second tier could wind up being the best team in the AL by the end of the season, and this tier doesn’t even include the reigning World Series champions. It would be hard to imagine any of the next best teams in the NL surpassing the Braves or Dodgers this year. Hopefully that means the AL playoff picture will be crowded and exciting.
The Yankees entered this offseason at a bit of crossroads. Their 2023 season was derailed by injuries to their biggest stars, and they still have far too much money tied up in guys in the decline phase of their careers. They really needed to make a splash to keep up with the rest of the teams in the AL East. And make a splash they did. The one-two punch of Aaron Judge and Juan Soto rivals that of any other team in baseball, and they also managed to add depth in the outfield, with Alex Verdugo and Trent Grisham, and the rotation, with Marcus Stroman. They’ve emerged as the slight favorites in their very competitive division.
The Rays traded Glasnow from their rotation, they won’t have Wander Franco in their lineup, and they’re still projected to finish second in the AL East with 86 wins. Not many other teams in baseball could survive losing two of their top players, much less project to be nearly as competitive. The depth of their roster is unrivaled, giving them plenty of leeway when the inevitable roster attrition begins to take its toll during the season. Unfortunately, their potential ceiling is a little lower without those same top contributors, making their chances of winning the division a little tougher.
The Twins, who cruised to a division title last year, look like they have a clear path to repeat. They still managed to improve their pitching staff and alleviate their infield logjam, even as they cut payroll. Despite the rosy projections, it still feels like the success of their season will hinge on the health of Byron Buxton, Carlos Correa, and Royce Lewis. If that trio is producing regularly, their lineup should be formidable. If not… well, the depth behind those three is rather lackluster.
For a brief moment, it looked like the Blue Jays had pulled off the heist of the offseason — and it involved sushi restaurants, flight trackers, and Canadian billionaires. Hearts across the north were broken when Shohei Ohtani did not step off that private jet in Toronto, and clothes rended asunder when he announced he’d be signing with the Dodgers a few hours later. Anything else the Jays did this offseason had to compete with that disappointment, which is why adding a couple of defense-first players and a 39-year-old designated hitter didn’t exactly generate a ton of excitement.
It was a long and winding road, and some of the individual moves didn’t necessarily make much sense in a vacuum, but the Mariners managed to red paper clip their way into a roster that looks roughly as talented as their squads from the past three seasons. Thanks to a young and talented pitching staff, Seattle is projected to have the best run prevention unit in baseball. That strength alone gives them a shot at toppling the Astros for the top spot in their division. Capping off their revamped lineup with Jorge Polanco gives their offense another middle-of-the-order hitter to help support Julio Rodríguez. They could use one more bat to lengthen their lineup, but that doesn’t seem likely.
After breaking out of their long rebuilding cycle with the AL’s best record last year, the Orioles have had an eventful offseason, though it took a while for the dominos to drop. As the calendar flipped to February, they traded for Corbin Burnes to give them an ace to lead their starting rotation. The very next day, news broke that John Angelos had agreed to sell the team to an investment group led by David Rubenstein. Hopefully, the change brings increased investment to the team, though it’ll probably take a while for those effects to be seen. Meanwhile, the roster looks as good as it did last year and Baltimore still has plenty of young talent on the cusp of making an impact in the big leagues.
| Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Sox | 82-80 | 103 | 98 | 97 | 137 |
| Diamondbacks | 83-79 | 100 | 96 | 97 | 131 |
| Cardinals | 83-79 | 106 | 103 | 99 | 120 |
| Phillies | 84-78 | 99 | 96 | 99 | 117 |
| Rangers | 82-80 | 106 | 101 | 103 | 109 |
The Red Sox don’t have a bad roster — and they were right to bring in Lucas Giolito, Tyler O’Neill, and Vaughn Grissom as complimentary pieces — but they don’t have a great one, either. The problem is that Boston plays in a division with four of the six teams in Tier Two, so it’s not enough to have a roster that is just OK. The Red Sox seem to be trying to straddle that awkward line between building toward the future and maintaining a roster that could luck into a Wild Card spot if enough things break their way.
The Diamondbacks have quietly had a strong offseason to support the squad that surprisingly won the NL pennant last year. They brought in Eduardo Rodriguez to bolster the starting rotation, re-signed Lourdes Gurriel Jr., traded for Eugenio Suárez, and signed Joc Pederson. They’re not splashy moves, but they do fill in some of the cracks that were exposed in the World Series once their good fortune ran out. They won’t challenge the Dodgers for the NL West crown, but they should be right in the thick of the Wild Card race again this season.
You can quibble about who they brought in, but the Cardinals had one job this offseason and they went right after it, signing Sonny Gray, Lance Lynn, and Kyle Gibson to revamp their starting pitching. Those three should be better than the patchwork staff that derailed St. Louis last season. Combined with a strong offensive core and solid bullpen, an improved rotation should be enough for the Cardinals to make last year a one-year blip rather than the start of a long decline.
By re-signing Aaron Nola and calling it an offseason, the Phillies have indicated they’re satisfied with running back the same group that has been so successful over the past two seasons. That’s not a terrible place to be in — back-to-back NLCS appearances is nothing to sneeze at — but it’s also not very aspirational. Of course, it’s hard to have higher aspirations when you have to chase down the Braves in the NL East, so another Wild Card berth will have to do.
It’s weird to see the Rangers this low in the rankings, but they’ve had a relatively quiet offseason for a team that just won a World Series. That said, they can look forward to their lineup continuing to be one of the league’s best, with a full season of Evan Carter and the eventual debut of Wyatt Langford. The problem is their pitching staff. Max Scherzer, Jacob deGrom, and Tyler Mahle are all expected to return from their respective injuries during the second half of the season. That should give them a formidable playoff rotation should they reach the postseason again, but the onus is on their healthy starters to hold down the fort for the first three months of the season.
| Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlins | 81-81 | 94 | 94 | 97 | 103 |
| Guardians | 80-82 | 99 | 100 | 99 | 90 |
| Brewers | 81-81 | 96 | 99 | 95 | 87 |
| Cubs | 81-81 | 98 | 99 | 99 | 82 |
| Giants | 80-82 | 99 | 96 | 102 | 96 |
| Padres | 81-81 | 99 | 103 | 105 | 65 |
There are five NL teams with projections sitting around .500 in this tier, with two more in the tier below, and they’ll all be fighting over one or two Wild Card spots. That should make for a dramatic race, though any one of those teams could begin to separate themselves from the pack by signing any of the free agents still on the market.
The Marlins have been very quiet this offseason — they’re the only remaining team who hasn’t signed a free agent to a major league contract. The moves they have made have been around the margins, bringing in some additional depth and utility types. Once again, they’re going to rely on their young and dynamic pitching staff to carry the load. It worked for them last year, though they benefited from some historic Pythagorean overperformance.
ZiPS actually likes Cleveland’s chances of challenging Minnesota in the AL Central, projecting the two teams to finish with the same record. That’s interesting, considering the Guardians enter this season with mostly the same players as last year’s team that missed the playoffs. But they’ve got a talented pitching staff that could carry them, and they’ll be calling on a couple of their prospects — Brayan Rocchio and Kyle Manzardo — to improve their lineup. It might not be enough, but Cleveland has the potential here to make for an interesting division race if things break right.
Boy, does the Brewers roster look different without Corbin Burnes and Brandon Woodruff leading their rotation. In a wide open division, Milwaukee has opted to try and build toward the future while still hoping for a competitive season in the present. In addition to top prospect Jackson Chourio, the Brewers have a bunch of other exciting youngsters who could make an impact in the big leagues this year. It wouldn’t surprise me to see them right in the thick of the playoff race.
The Cubs stayed competitive until the final week of last season, but they’ve failed to address the big hole on their roster that opened when Cody Bellinger hit free agency. They did sign Shōta Imanaga, which should give them a boost to their starting rotation, and they also picked up Michael Busch from the Dodgers in a savvy little trade. There’s still time to re-sign Bellinger, but until they do, they look like they’re a hair behind the Cardinals in the NL Central.
The Giants finally added some oomph to their lineup by signing Jorge Soler to a three-year deal earlier this week. Along with newcomer Jung Hoo Lee, San Francisco has brought in two solid offensive players to bolster its lineup. The Giants have capable starters across every position, and they have some decent depth, but they still lack the upside to push their projection above .500. They could go out and sign Blake Snell, which would certainly help, but they’re clearly not good enough to challenge the Dodgers for the division. They’ll be stuck fighting with the other high-variance teams in the NL for those last Wild Card spots.
After the death of owner Peter Seidler and a television contract that was suddenly up-in-the-air, the Padres cut payroll after spending lavishly during recent offseasons. The Juan Soto trade helped solve that issue while also restocking their starting rotation. San Diego still has plenty of talent on the big league roster, and top prospect Jackson Merrill is knocking on the door, but the Padres desperately need another outfielder, even after re-signing Jurickson Profar.
| Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tigers | 80-82 | 97 | 100 | 99 | 78 |
| Reds | 80-82 | 98 | 99 | 104 | 74 |
| Mets | 80-82 | 102 | 104 | 103 | 71 |
| Angels | 78-84 | 103 | 104 | 104 | 85 |
The Tigers have spent this offseason filling in the edges of their roster, with righty starters Kenta Maeda and Jack Flaherty being the standout acquisitions. They also handed out a big extension to top prospect Colt Keith; he’ll join the collection of young hitters already in the big leagues. If enough things break its way, Detroit could surprise in the weak AL Central. However, it’s more likely that the Tigers are another year away from the end of their rebuild.
The Reds have the enviable problem of having too many young infielders for not enough spots, and manager David Bell will have to figure out how to get them all regular at-bats while also juggling their development when the inevitable growing pains come along. Even with all that position player talent and the additions of Frankie Montas and Nick Martinez, the projections peg Cincinnati to be right around where it finished last year. That’s not terrible, considering the Reds were in the playoff conversation right up until the last weekend of the season, but they’ll need to get a lot from their youngsters to rise above their current projections.
The Mets fell the furthest of any team in these rankings over the offseason. You get the sense that this year is being treated as an evaluation year by their new president of baseball operations David Stearns as he begins to put his stamp on the organization. There’s still talent on this roster, though. If some of their veterans return to form and Francisco Alvarez and Brett Baty produce, the Mets could challenge for a Wild Card spot.
If the Mets are stuck in the limbo of not rebuilding yet, the Angels are even further out in the cold. They realized they couldn’t replace the production of a unicorn like Shohei Ohtani, so they didn’t try to do that this offseason. Instead, they brought in a pile of relievers and are hoping for a return to health from all of their key contributors on offense. Even if Mike Trout, Anthony Rendon, and Taylor Ward all play full seasons, that still won’t be enough to compete in the crowded AL Wild Card race, and there aren’t many reinforcements coming up through their farm system, either.
| Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pirates | 77-85 | 94 | 104 | 97 | 60 |
| Royals | 76-86 | 97 | 102 | 103 | 52 |
| Athletics | 72-90 | 93 | 110 | 104 | 21 |
| Rockies | 64-98 | 84 | 106 | 100 | 33 |
| White Sox | 68-94 | 91 | 111 | 109 | 9 |
| Nationals | 66-96 | 88 | 114 | 106 | 5 |
Even though they’ve started to graduate some of their prospects, the Pirates are still a step behind the other teams in their division. Oneil Cruz and Ke’Bryan Hayes look like franchise pillars, but Pittsburgh doesn’t have enough to contend just yet.
After signing Bobby Witt Jr. to a franchise-record extension, the Royals face the difficult task of building a winning roster around him. Signing veteran starters Michael Wacha and Seth Lugo to support a beleaguered pitching staff was a good start, but the Royals needed to do more than make incremental moves, and so far, they haven’t. Considering there isn’t much coming through the minor league system, either, Kansas City would probably be better off trading away Wacha and Lugo for prospects during the season to hopefully speed up this rebuild.
The A’s lost 112 games last year, but it’s hard to care about the product they put on the field because of their impending move to Las Vegas. The best thing you can say about Oakland’s roster right now is that it is not projected to be the worst team in the majors. Unfortunately, there’s a serious lack of upside on the big league roster and little high-end talent down on the farm. It’s possible that when (or, at this point, if) the A’s head to Vegas four years from now, they will still be one of the worst teams in baseball.
You’d think the Rockies would’ve learned a valuable lesson after striking gold with their under-the-radar pickup of Nolan Jones last offseason. But instead of working to find more under-appreciated, talented players who are blocked from getting regular playing time elsewhere, they spent this offseason acting as uninspired as ever. Maybe they expect to see some growth from Ezequiel Tovar and healthy seasons from Kris Bryant and Brendan Rodgers, but there isn’t much else to get excited about on this roster.
It’s a sad state of affairs. The most that White Sox fans can look forward to this season is that their team trades its two best players, Dylan Cease and Luis Robert Jr. for the package of prospects that could form the next great South Siders roster. Until they trade those two, the Sox will likely avoid being the worst team in the majors, but the bottom could fall out very quickly after the deadline.
At the end of this season, the Nationals will be one year closer to seeing the fruits of the Juan Soto trade in the majors. That’s the best that can be said about their roster as it’s currently constructed. Sure, CJ Abrams looks mildly interesting as a breakout candidate, and it isn’t the worst plan to bank on Joey Gallo, Nick Senzel, and Jesse Winker returning to form. But make no mistake, this organization is in a holding pattern until its ownership question is answered.
…
| Rank | Team | Projected Record | wRC+ | SP- | RP- | Team Quality | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Braves | 97-65 | 114 | 88 | 92 | 200 | 0 |
| 2 | Dodgers | 92-70 | 111 | 94 | 101 | 168 | 7 |
| 3 | Astros | 90-72 | 111 | 97 | 97 | 169 | 0 |
| 4 | Yankees | 89-73 | 111 | 98 | 100 | 145 | 2 |
| 5 | Rays | 86-76 | 106 | 99 | 98 | 141 | -3 |
| 6 | Twins | 84-78 | 102 | 96 | 95 | 143 | -1 |
| 7 | Blue Jays | 84-78 | 104 | 98 | 97 | 141 | -3 |
| 8 | Mariners | 86-76 | 102 | 95 | 99 | 134 | 0 |
| 9 | Orioles | 86-76 | 105 | 97 | 102 | 133 | 1 |
| 10 | Red Sox | 82-80 | 103 | 98 | 97 | 137 | 1 |
| 11 | Diamondbacks | 83-79 | 100 | 96 | 97 | 131 | 7 |
| 12 | Cardinals | 83-79 | 106 | 103 | 99 | 120 | 4 |
| 13 | Phillies | 84-78 | 99 | 96 | 99 | 117 | -6 |
| 14 | Rangers | 82-80 | 106 | 101 | 103 | 109 | -2 |
| 15 | Marlins | 81-81 | 94 | 94 | 97 | 103 | -1 |
| 16 | Guardians | 80-82 | 99 | 100 | 99 | 90 | 4 |
| 17 | Brewers | 81-81 | 96 | 99 | 95 | 87 | 0 |
| 18 | Cubs | 81-81 | 98 | 99 | 99 | 82 | 3 |
| 19 | Giants | 80-82 | 99 | 96 | 102 | 96 | 0 |
| 20 | Padres | 81-81 | 99 | 103 | 105 | 65 | -5 |
| 21 | Tigers | 80-82 | 97 | 100 | 99 | 78 | 1 |
| 22 | Reds | 80-82 | 98 | 99 | 104 | 74 | 1 |
| 23 | Mets | 80-82 | 102 | 104 | 103 | 71 | -10 |
| 24 | Angels | 78-84 | 103 | 104 | 104 | 85 | 0 |
| 25 | Pirates | 77-85 | 94 | 104 | 97 | 60 | 0 |
| 26 | Royals | 76-86 | 97 | 102 | 103 | 52 | 0 |
| 27 | Athletics | 72-90 | 93 | 110 | 104 | 21 | 0 |
| 28 | Rockies | 64-98 | 84 | 106 | 100 | 33 | 0 |
| 29 | White Sox | 68-94 | 91 | 111 | 109 | 9 | 1 |
| 30 | Nationals | 66-96 | 88 | 114 | 106 | 5 | -1 |
Jake Mailhot is a contributor to FanGraphs. A long-suffering Mariners fan, he also writes about them for Lookout Landing. Follow him on BlueSky @jakemailhot.
Go O’s
Wow the season starts pretty soon and looking at the top free agents list, a bunch of them still haven’t signed with a MLB team
It does seem very late
Seattle and Baltimore in the same tier? I see it’s going to be another year of vibes-based nonsense.
If we agreed that Seattle and Baltimore had EXACTLY the same amount of skill, how many more wins would you give Seattle during the season just based on them facing the A’s nine more times, while the weakest opponent in the AL East is Boston?
I’d say same tier makes perfect sense.
Perhaps my indignation came off incorrectly; I’m trying to figure out why there’s a belief that SEA is comparable to BAL. Who believes that? I agree that the wins will be skewed because of the scheduling, but in a head to head series, would SEA be favored in any game?
According to the chart, the Mariners supposedly have better pitching than the Orioles.
The Orioles have Corbin Burns and Grayson Rodriguez as the only surefire starters to open the season. Kremer has a UCL sprain and could miss a massive amount of time, Means is behind schedule and isn’t expected to come back until at least late April, Bradish is out for the year, and the best after that is Wells, Irvin, and Bruce Zimmerman, none of whom inspire a ton of confidence. And their bullpen won’t have Bautista for the whole year either. Their bullpen now has Kimbrel, Coulombe, Cano, and Dillon Tate as their projected top 4. That’s just uninspiring.
Seattle has a better bullpen, and a far superior rotation, at least on paper. It takes until their #4 starter (Miller) to approximate Grayson Rodriguez’s expected value. If Gray-Rod breaks out, awesome (I’m rooting for him), but there are still three blanks behind him.
I couldn’t agree more. I know it is very hard to win 101 games, and definitely even more so playing in the AL East, but the Orioles have added a true ace to a group of the best young players to be assembled on one franchise in quite awhile. I tend to expect talent to perform and Holliday should be a huge upgrade over Mateo. A 15 game drop off, even without Bautista, seems extreme.
Projections will (mostly) never peg a team for over 100 wins. The Braves are tabbed at 97, which is about as high I recall a team. The O’s are not the Braves.
Was Baltimore a true talent 101 win team or did they outperform their expected win total by 7 or so wins depending on which metric you choose? 2023 was a great season and I don’t want to take anything away from that, but they were blessed to hit that win total.
The absolute peak Dodgers (21 I think, maybe 22) made 99-100. Of course, they won even more than that.
That’s pretty amazing in itself. I can’t think of another team that would come close, maybe the ’98 Yankees?
so i recognize that you say how you get the team calc, but i still don’t really get it
like how are the phillies given a Quality score of 117 with a 99/96/99
but cleveland is given a quality score of 90 but the only difference is that the pitching staff is SLIGHTLY worse at 100. WRC+ and RP projections are the exact same
While that four point difference between the Phillies and Guardians starting rotations might appear slight, it’s all relative. Philadelphia is projected to have the sixth best rotation in the majors while Cleveland is only 18th. In addition, SP/RP share would affect the overall score (though in this case that effect is minimal since both teams project to have similar bullpens).
Because the “calc” is nonsense.
I’m not claiming I know how the calculations work, but a 4 point advantage in pitching is significant because it’s relative to the league.
100 is average, but take a look at the SP table. No one except the Braves have a SP lower than 94. So having a 96 compared to a 100 is a significant difference. Here it’s the difference in being average and having a top 5 pitching staff.
It is too bad that Fangraphs doesn’t run a book on the side. I would like to make a substantial wager on the under 72 wins for the A’s. Going under on the Angels at 78 wins might be an even better proposition. I wonder why some people can’t accept the fact that some players, who were once very good, are now washed up. Anthony Rendon is out of the shower and, sadly, Mike Trout just might be. On the positive side I wouldn’t be afraid to back the Rangers over 82 and the Dodgers look foolishly low at 92. How many times will Betts, Freeman and Ohtani bust the game wide open in the 1st inning?
I think the projections here are generally reasonable. I think the O’s are a good chance to go over, the A’s should be a big under, and of course, give me all of that Cardinals under.
Many of Rendon’s problems have been health related. If he could actually stay healthy for a full season again, there’s a decent chance that he could become a good player again.
Although, we also have to keep in mind that he’s now 33 years old, turning 34 in June.
I’d take the under on the Nats without even looking.
White Sox are ranked too high. But on the other hand, they are also going to be very dull to watch.
Jake, if you could breakdown how the Twins have a Team Quality of 143 while the O’s have a Team Quality of 133 but also beat the Twins in all three categories? Same question goes for Astros vs Yankees. My guess is you are weighing schedule/division (and maybe depth and other things) pretty heavily but you don’t explain that at all so it’s hard to trust anything we see here.
I trust there is a logical calculus here and I believe that you want to keep it secret. However, I think you owe more of an explanation than what you provide in two sentences when those numbers don’t add up at all.
The Yankees are -24 in Team Quality compared to the Astros without being worse in any category.
SP- and RP- are minus stats so lower is better. The Astros starting rotation and bullpen are both projected to be better than the Yankees which is where the difference between their team quality comes from.
Same for the O’s and Twins. Baltimore is projected to have a better offense, but Minnesota’s distinct advantage in the bullpen pushes their overall team quality higher.
Ah I misread that, thank you Jake, and I apologize if I came off as rude. I tried to be careful before posting but apparently not careful enough.
I still feel that there is something unexplained here that would help to explain how, for instance, the Yankees are so far below the Astros in TQ while only being a couple points shy in the metrics.
Thank you for fueling my copium about how good the Orioles are going to be. Surely THIS will be the Yankees’ year!
Oh thank god, you’ve brought back the total rubbish “team quality” stat. Looking forward to 6-8 months of confusing rankings not based on actual production or W-L records.
There are rankings based on actual W-L records!! They are called the “standings” I believe
Without OAA in there, it’s a lot less vibes based. I notice a significant improvement already.
Besides, the actual order of the rankings isn’t based completely on the team quality stat.
Now that Kyle Bradish is out for the year, the placement of the orioles looks correct tbh.
Strange things are afoot in the SP rankings. How do the Marlins project to have the second best rotation in MLB??? They are easily not in my top 5. And then the Giants as the 8th best rotation? Their rotation is Webb + hopes and dreams.
They have a great rotation full of average to above-average options, as well as some minor league depth. I’d be curious to hear who you slot ahead of them, save for the Mariners.
All 5 of the Marlins projected starters are barely above average at worst. That’s a deep solid rotation almost any team would be envious of. Oh, and they’re all under 27.
Something is still unclear. The Blue Jays have a higher Team Quality than the Orioles (and the same as the Rays). Yet they are projected to win two less games than either of those two teams. They’re all in the same division, so will play almost exactly the same schedule. Why are they projected to win less games?
Power Rankings, Opening day 2023:
TEX: 83-79, 121 Team Quality, 39.8% Playoff Odds
“The Rangers are determined to prove that a team can simply spend its way out of a rebuilding cycle. The health of the starting rotation, now fronted by Jacob deGrom, Nathan Eovaldi, and Andrew Heaney, will likely make or break their season. A lot of other teams can say that, too, but for the Rangers, it’s the risk they knowingly took on when they spent $240 million on that trio. The bullpen, meanwhile, looks to be as threadbare as it was last year when Texas lost 35 one-run games.”
Now, these World Series Champions Texas Rangers:
Improved bullpen, stronger outfield, similar rotation, and good/great reinforcements on the way, +Carter & Langford:
2024 Current Power Ranking
TEX: 82-80, 103 Team Quality.
-18 team quality because DeGrom will miss the first half, right after he missed nearly the entire season? Surely Mitch Garver scooting to Seattle isn’t worth -10 in team quality.
Second half returns:
Jacob DeGrom -7, Max Scherzer -4, Tyler Mahle -3,
losing Garver -3,
Weaker Bullpen -1.
-18 in total. That would be my guess. The rotation as a whole in the first half is held together by spit and bailing wire.
A suggestion: could you re-consider the stats so that all three are + is better or – is better. I can’t be the only one constantly trying to figure out what I’m reading when the scale switches. Prefer you switch the pitching stats to + version so for all three numbers, higher is better.
Dodgers won 100 last year. Add Ohtani, Yamamoto, Glasnow, Lux, Paxton, and Hernandez. Subtract JD Martinez and Peralta. Will win 8 fewer games. Is the division stronger? Maybe slightly. DBacks and Giants a bit better, Padres worse. I’m searching for an intelligent rationale.
I love this article every week because it just makes everyone absolutely furious. No one understands the methodology, and everyone is completely convinced that fangraphs is conspiring against their team.
Baltimore will start the season 10-0, be 5th in the power rankings, and people will be absolutely melting down in the comments.