Mike Trout’s Season is Over, Which Completely Sucks
The transition from the regular season to the playoffs inevitably leaves us with a stripped-down cast of the game’s best players, but this is getting ridiculous. After a week in which NL MVP candidate Christian Yelich was lost for the year with a fractured kneecap, Javier Báez was ruled out for the remainder of the regular season due to a fractured left thumb, and both Byron Buxton and Shohei Ohtani elected to undergo season-ending surgeries, we’ve now lost Mike Trout as well. The best baseball player on planet Earth will undergo surgery on his right foot later this week, according to the Angels, bringing to a premature end yet another remarkable season.
Trout had not played since making a pinch-hitting appearance on September 7, a day after he took an early exit from a game due to what was termed “right toe discomfort.” Two days later, he underwent a cryoablation procedure (the insertion of hollow needles filled with cooled, thermally conductive fluids) to alleviate a Morton’s neuroma, an inflamed nerve located between the bones at the ball of the foot. The condition is more common among women than men because of the way high heels put pressure on the toes or the ball of the foot, but any kind of repetitive, high-impact activity can cause it, particularly when tight shoes are involved.
Trout had been dealing with pain in the foot for nearly a month, according to the Los Angeles Times’ Maria Torres. Said the 28-year-old center fielder after the cryoablation, “Once it flares up, it doesn’t go away. It calms down at night and when you do baseball activity, it flares up again… This procedure today, they say it helps it.”
Trout was only expected to miss a few games in the wake of the procedure. He was slated to DH on Friday but was scratched from the lineup after experiencing further discomfort when putting his cleats on, and ruled out for Saturday as well. He hoped to play on Sunday, but those hopes were dashed prior to the game. Per MLB.com’s Rhett Bollinger:
After testing out the foot by running before Sunday’s game against the Rays at Angel Stadium, the decision was made to undergo the season-ending procedure.
“Tested the foot again, wasn’t getting any better. Kind of exhausted all non-surgical possibilities,” Angels manager Brad Ausmus said. “It was just unplayable. And it’s not just the playing. Walking around in shower shoes in the clubhouse was hurting him. If you go back three weeks, it would flare up and go away, flare up and go away, but now we’re at a point where it flares up and does not go away.”
…The upcoming procedure removes the nerve so that it won’t be an issue going forward. Trout will have it at some point next week and it carries a recovery time of roughly two weeks.
“He definitely wants to play,” Ausmus said. “Even going back to less than 24 hours, he felt like [Sunday] might be the day. But I think when he woke up this morning and came out here and tested it, he realized it’s not a pain he can deal with. He performed at a very high level, and I think he understands that at this point, forcing himself on the field with a neuroma in his foot wouldn’t be productive.”
With the Angels entering Sunday at 67-82, having clinched their fourth straight sub-.500 season, there wasn’t much Trout could do to help their cause, though he certainly could have put the finishing touches on own his case for a third AL MVP award. He’s never led the league in homers, but he currently holds a 45-44 edge over the Royals’ Jorge Soler. More secure are his current league leads in on-base percentage (.438 to Alex Bregman‘s .420), slugging percentage (.645 to Nelson Cruz’s .622), wRC+ (179 to Bregman’s 164), and WAR (8.6 to Bregman’s 7.4); by Baseball-Reference’s version, the margin is a bit tighter (8.3 to 7.5) but still substantial.
The shame of it is that this is now Trout’s third straight season marred by injuries and what-ifs. While he didn’t officially hit the injured/disabled list the way he did in 2017 (when he was limited to 114 games due to midseason surgery on his left thumb) or ’18 (when he was held to 140 games by a bout of right wrist inflammation), his 134 games is fewer than he played even in his 2012 rookie season, and he’s now averaged just 129 games over the past three seasons, missing about 20% of games overall. As with last year, his performance prorates to a 10-WAR season, but he couldn’t stay on the field long enough to reach that threshold, as he did in 2012 and ’13 — two of the four times it’s been done by a player since 2005 (Mookie Betts in ’18 and Buster Posey in ’12 are the others).
Will it be enough for MVP? The precedents exist, both for players on sub-.500 teams and for those with abbreviated seasons. Six players, including Trout himself, have won the hardware a total of seven times while toiling for teams with losing records:
| Player | Team | Year | Team W-L | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal Ripken Jr. | Orioles | 1991 | 67-95 | .414 |
| Alex Rodriguez | Rangers | 2003 | 71-91 | .438 |
| Mike Trout | Angels | 2016 | 74-88 | .457 |
| Ernie Banks | Cubs | 1958 | 72-82 | .468 |
| Andre Dawson | Cubs | 1987 | 76-85 | .472 |
| Giancarlo Stanton | Marlins | 2017 | 77-85 | .475 |
| Ernie Banks | Cubs | 1959 | 74-80 | .480 |
Despite two wins in the past three years for players on sub-.500 teams, I think the sample size is too small to conclude that the tide has really turned here. For what it’s worth, despite the Trout-less Angels’ victory on Sunday, their .453 winning percentage is still lower than the 2016 team’s. Meanwhile, nine non-catcher position players from the post-1960 expansion era have won the award while playing 140 games or fewer in a non-strike season:
| Player | Team | Year | G |
|---|---|---|---|
| George Brett | Royals | 1980 | 117 |
| Mickey Mantle | Yankees | 1962 | 123 |
| Willie Stargell* | Pirates | 1979 | 126 |
| Barry Bonds | Giants | 2003 | 130 |
| Josh Hamilton | Rangers | 2010 | 133 |
| Juan Gonzalez | Rangers | 1996 | 134 |
| Mookie Betts | Red Sox | 2018 | 136 |
| Rickey Henderson | Athletics | 1990 | 136 |
| Barry Bonds | Pirates | 1992 | 140 |
The problem for Trout, if indeed there is one, is that no player overlaps the two lists, and in fact everyone from the second list played for a team that reached the postseason. Near-perfect attendance doesn’t seem to matter to the voters if a player’s absence isn’t stopping a team from playing into October.
Recently, FiveThirtyEight’s Neil Paine built a model to estimate the chances of a league WAR leader winning the MVP when his team was significantly worse than that of the second-ranked player on a much better team (as is the case for Bregman this year). If we prorate Bregman through the remainder of the season (7.9 WAR), Trout would have a 0.7 WAR advantage while playing for a team with a 196-point deficit in winning percentage. Interpolating Paine’s table, the model estimates about a 28% chance of Trout winning the award, rising to 32% if the Angels could somehow trim the winning percentage gap to 180 points.
To be sure, Bregman has a reasonable case for the honor, though anybody who goes beyond evaluating the candidates’ individual merits to suggest that Trout shouldn’t win because the Angels are still nowhere near the playoffs even with his dominance had damn well better also concede that the Astros, who lead the A’s by 7 1/2 games, could just as easily have won the AL West title without Bregman’s contributions. Likewise for the Yankees, who lead the AL East by nine games, and DJ LeMahieu, whose 5.0 WAR doesn’t even put him in the same ballpark as Trout and Bregman but whose clutchiness (in the form of an admittedly impressive .390/.437/.559 showing in 136 PA with runners in scoring position) has given him traction in some quarters, a few of which are occupied by trolls. LeMahieu’s RISP line is good for an impressive 164 wRC+, but guess who has hit .297/.489/.670 for a 184 wRC+ in 133 PA with runners in scoring position? Mike F’ing Trout, that’s who (Bregman has hit a comparatively ho-hum .250/.365/.524 for a 128 wRC+ in that context, not that anyone should really dwell upon it). As for more comprehensive measures of situational performance, Trout is third in the majors in WPA (5.62, behind Yelich’s 7.86 and Cody Bellinger’s 5.99) and second in WPA/LA (7.22 to Yelich’s 7.65). Bregman and LeMahieu are respectively 14th and 26th in the former (4.31 and 3.57) and fourth and 28th in the latter (5.87 and 3.44), not that anybody who’s seriously pushing LeMahieu is basing their argument on so esoteric a stat as context-neutral wins.
Anyway, either the voters will give Trout his due or they’ll take the opportunity to screw him again, and the debates will far outlast the season. If I ever cross paths with Dave Egan in an afterlife, I’ll give him a piece of my mind about leaving Ted Williams off his 1947 AL MVP ballot.
While the book is closed on Trout’s 2019 season save for the voting, we can marvel at the man’s progress towards Cooperstown. I’ve been tracking his progress with regards to my Baseball-Reference WAR-based JAWS system, and despite the premature end to his season, he’s attained one more milestone. His 8.3 bWAR stands as his sixth-best season, supplanting his 6.6 WAR from 2017 within his seven-year peak score, which at 65.5 WAR ranks third among all center fielders behind only (ahem) Willie Mays and Ty Cobb. With that and his career total of 72.6, he’s nosed ahead of Ken Griffey Jr. to take over the number five ranking in JAWS:
| Rk | Name | Career WAR | Peak WAR | JAWS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Willie Mays* | 156.4 | 73.7 | 115.0 |
| 2 | Ty Cobb* | 151.0 | 69.2 | 110.1 |
| 3 | Tris Speaker* | 134.1 | 62.3 | 98.2 |
| 4 | Mickey Mantle* | 110.3 | 64.8 | 87.6 |
| 5 | Mike Trout | 72.6 | 65.5 | 69.0 |
| 6 | Ken Griffey Jr.* | 83.8 | 54.0 | 68.9 |
| 7 | Joe DiMaggio* | 78.1 | 51.0 | 64.5 |
| 8 | Duke Snider* | 66.4 | 49.9 | 58.1 |
| Avg of 19 HOF CF | 71.1 | 44.5 | 57.8 | |
| 9 | Carlos Beltran | 69.6 | 44.4 | 57.0 |
| 10 | Kenny Lofton | 68.3 | 43.4 | 55.9 |
| 11 | Andruw Jones | 62.8 | 46.5 | 54.7 |
| 12 | Richie Ashburn* | 63.9 | 44.5 | 54.2 |
| 13 | Andre Dawson* | 64.8 | 42.7 | 53.7 |
| 14 | Billy Hamilton* | 63.3 | 42.7 | 53.0 |
| 15 | Jim Edmonds | 60.4 | 42.6 | 51.5 |
| 22 | Larry Doby* | 49.6 | 39.6 | 44.6 |
| 23 | Kirby Puckett* | 51.1 | 37.6 | 44.4 |
| 27 | Max Carey* | 54.0 | 32.9 | 43.5 |
| 28 | Earl Averill* | 48.0 | 37.3 | 42.7 |
| 38 | Earle Combs* | 42.5 | 34.3 | 38.4 |
| 39 | Edd Roush* | 45.3 | 31.5 | 38.4 |
| 43 | Hack Wilson* | 38.9 | 35.8 | 37.3 |
| 46 | Hugh Duffy* | 43.1 | 30.9 | 37.0 |
| 117 | Lloyd Waner* | 24.1 | 20.3 | 22.2 |
*Hall of Famer. Note discontinuity in rankings after top 15.
That’s remarkable, particularly considering that he hasn’t officially reached the minimum 10 seasons required for election to the Hall. He’ll do that next year, hopefully on Opening Day; for the purposes of Hall qualification, one game is enough to equal one season, so his 2011 cup of coffee is no handicap in that department. Not that he’s anywhere close to done, but as we stare out the window and wait for spring, the return of Mike Trout will be one more thing to welcome.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
And now Anthony Rizzo may be out with a sprained ankle. This September has been particularly brutal on MLB’s star players.
Let’s hope that Mike Trout can once again shatter expectations and (assuming he’s still the WAR leader) take home an extremely unlikely MVP.
what really sucks for Trout is now he’ll have missed in the last 3 years a combined 98 games. Going by his pace in those 3 years- he should have 30 more homers and over 100 more hits.
True, but there may be something to the idea that an enforced break for a non-ligament injury could give him some extra recovery time. Playing 160 games every year may wear on your body more than 120.
Games played since 2012
Trout: 1159
Pujols (with all his injuries, surgeries, aches and pains, sitting to rest, etc.): 1105
the problem is though last 3 years games- when Pujols is 37-39….
Pujols 385+ whatever he plays these last 2 weeks
Trout 388
I finally have something in common with Mike Trout, lol. I had surgery for Morton’s Neuroma 30 some odd years ago when I was in my early thirties.
I’m worried. How many games of professional baseball have you played since the surgery?
It ended his career.
Did you have the sensory nerve removed like he’s reportedly doing? Does that cause numbness or anything that might affect movement and balance?
Sure, Bregman is the next most likely guy if the voters decide to not give it to Trout. I was surprised, however, to find out that the only other name really mention was LeMahieu. LeMahieu is only 9th in (batter) WAR in the AL. His only selling point is that he’s the Yankee with the most accumulated season value.
Who’s 3rd behind Trout and Bregman?
Why it’s no other than …
.
.
.
.
Marcus Semien.
Wow.
LeMahieu shouldn’t even be in the top 5. There’s better cases to be made for Chapman, Semien, Betts, Bogaerts, Devers, Verlander, Cole, maybe Springer.
I think Trout is a shoe in this year because he pretty much enamored the voters early on, and Bregman didn’t turn it on until late in the season the voters made up their minds in July. A recent poll on mlb.com had all 34 voters giving him their first place votes. Trout obviously has the edge but this kind of dominance of the votes seems to not quite reflect difference in WAR. It seems like Trout is getting some benefit from the entirety of his amazing run and history of getting snubbed from previous MVP awards.
1 thing I remember from a few years ago Sale/Kluber Cy Young race- the MLB.com voters tend to be a lot more advanced metrics savy than the actual voters. They were solidly in Sale’s corner, and we know how the actual vote went down.
But, I do think Trout will win.
The thing is MVP voting isn’t 100% performance. At least a portion of the vote is situation dependent. As with the CY Young, the narrative matters to many voters.
This year’s AL MVP is a toss up. Trout has the edge in raw nunbers but missing him for a month isn’t what sunk the Angels. Bregman is good but he might be the best player on his team. LeMahieu isn’t the best performer but he’s gone wire to wire on a team riddled with missing stars and still running away.
Pick your poison. None is *wrong* but none is a slamdunk.
right. And all I was saying is that the actual voters look at things FAR different than mlb.com voters do.
Some even bring axes to grind.
I was trying to decide whether the title lives up to the standards of journalistic objectivity, or if maybe the author is allowing his own point of view to intrude upon the story. Probably lots of people do not think this sucks at all! For instance, Brian Goodwin and his family, Michael Hermosillo and his family, the entire Astros’ organization…
But then I thought, maybe those people all think it sucks too? Being a journalist is hard.
Why would Goodwin and Hermosillo be happy that their teammate (and likely friend) is injured?
Playing time? But most important is that I’m making a deeply serious point here
You are being pedantic which the opposite of deeply serious.
Thaaaaaat’s not what he’s being.
Perhaps I was being the opposite of deeply serious
He isn’t playing, and it completely sucks.
I agree that Trout is better than Bregman and that the MVP should go to the best player, but I’m not sure I agree the Astros definitely would have easily won the AL West without Bregman. If Bregman is a 7.5 WAR player and the Astros are 7.5 games ahead of Oakland, isn’t it reasonable to assume that without Bregman all year the Astros and A’s could have found themselves in a very close race for the division?
If we assume that Bregman is replaced by a 0WAR player, then sure…
Would you prefer to have MVP awards depend on the quality of a team’s farm system?
The Astros have carried some pretty bad hitters in recent years despite their overall lineup power. They also have had a very unhealthy Carlos Correa, whom Bregman has often replaced throughout the season at SS.
While the Astros would’ve surely traded for a serviceable 3rd baseman in a hypothetical world where Bregman is out for the year, if we assume they just use internal options I wouldn’t say replacement of Diaz/Straw/Toro gets you much beyond replacement level. In which case they would be neck and neck with the As right now.
“the Astros, who lead the A’s by 7 1/2 games, could just as easily have won the AL West title without Bregman’s contributions”.
If my math is correct, that Bregman has 7.5 WAR means the Astros would NOT be the sole division leaders in the AL West without Bregman’s contributions. In fact, if Bregman was incapable of playing all over the infield, the Astros would’ve been really screwed when Correa missed 86 games with injuries, and Altuve missed 39 games, and Diaz missed 67 games (to go along with Springer missing 31 games).
This is my basic view of how to award MVP. What player served as the greatest difference between his team’s relative competitiveness and not? That doesn’t mean they have to make the playoffs; a 9-WAR player on a team who misses by one game is still pretty clearly the huge difference between that team being forgettable and having 162 meaningful games. But if the Astros end up winning the division by 11 or 12 games, for instance, that suggests to me Bregman was a little less valuable than, say, Marcus Semien on an A’s team that gets in by one game.
At the moment, I think Bregman is probably the best choice. There’s also something to be said for being comfortable rather than in a neck and neck race, so if they end up winning by 9 games while he’s worth 8 I think that’s still pretty comfortably an MVP-type situation. But if they end up with a 13- or 14-game lead at the end, my instinct would be to look down the standings a bit.
I know there’s a giant hole in this view: if you could swap Trout’s performance with the worst outfielder on any marginally competitive team, that team would make the playoffs. Surely that suggests Trout’s value is really high. But some amount of context ought to be part of the discussion, and the reality is Trout’s context is a team whose executives didn’t construct a competitive team, so his performance was mostly the difference between being exciting but bad and being dull and still bad.
Nothing feels like a playoff race. The player who made the most difference to being in or out of one seems like the person who changed the shape and feel of the season the most. To my mind that’s the most valuable player.
That’s fair. But the Astros went to the World Series in 2017 because they won game 7 of the ALCS against the Yankees at home. In fact, every game of that series was won by the home-team. So this year, every single win matters to the Astros because they are tied with the Yankees for best-record in the AL, which would determine home-field advantage in a potential rematch. I mean, getting the top-seed is a huge advantage. There’s a big difference between 1 and 2 (particularly since the top-seed gets to play a wild-card-game winner that burned its ace in the wild-card-game).
So, you would award the MVP to the best player on a team that just barely makes or misses the playoffs? Somehow, that seems ridiculous to me.
No, but I do have a notion of “value”, and to me, the best judge of that is “where is my team with me versus where would they be without me?”
So while being in playoff contention is not a requirement, it does give a player a bonus of sorts. It’s a large one too – somewhere around 2 WAR I’d say (and voting history seems to suggest the same).
I have a camera that’s worth $500. A poorer person has a camera with less features that’s worth $200. The poor person might value that camera more because it’s worth a larger percentage of his net worth, but the $500 camera takes better pictures and has more value on the open market if he wanted to sell it. THAT’S what I consider “value”. Trout is the $500 camera, by the way.
So a guy who bats .450 with 65 homers, 60 stolen bases, and gold glove defense at shortstop would not be the MVP if his team won 130 games? What sense does that make? By far the greatest individual season ever for by far the greatest team season ever is not even the MVP of that season?
Only 65 homers? Psh, didn’t even break Barry’s record.
Or what if his team wins only 80 games and misses the playoffs? Should the award be given to another player who bats .310 with 35 homers 20 steals, etc. over your hypothetical guy because his team won 95 games and won their division by a couple of games? NO!!!
I didn’t intend anybody to interpret what I said about Bergman so literally that they would assume that his hypothetical replacement would produce 0.0 WAR. They do have a competent GM and deep resources, after all. If they didn’t have Bregman they’d have traded for talent or (depending upon where we start this hypothetical) retained Marwin and/or J.D Davis, etc.
As with Yelich, Trout is hurt not only by the games to the end of the season he will miss, but the ten or so he missed previously. If he had finished with > 140 games played, I think he would easily win over Bregman.
Would the Angels tanking (more than they already have) for the remainder of the season help to demonstrate Trout’s value to the team more than hurt his case for MVP as a candidate from a team with a poor winning %?
maybe normally, but it’s just a function of a really brutal end of season schedule…
Indians, Rays, @ Yankees, @ Astros, A’s, Astros
If the Angels go 7-5 through that stretch, there’ll be at least one troll voter to suggest Trout isn’t *valuable*.
yeah, in terms of hte schedule, Trout is in a no win situation. They lose out(or come close) -and it’s a tough rest of season schedule. If they do well, it’s just like you said.
I think it might be a good idea to see what Bregman does in the last ~12 games before declaring Trout “screwed.” If Bregman plays great, he’ll be close enough to Trout in WAR to make the “screwed” argument pretty weak.
I agree that LeMahieu should not be the AL MVP. That said, he does have a very interesting narrative attached to his candidacy that may sway some voters. Remember that when he signed with the Yankees, his job was to be the super utility guy. He was not even in the opening day line-up. From there, he was thrust into the starting lineup due to the Yankees roster being about as durable as wet toilet paper, making himself the keystone of the “next man up” mentality this Yankee team has adopted on the way to an inexplicable 100+ win season. Yeah, he may not be the MVP but I’d rather be watching his movie.
Sadly, Trout’s narrative for most of his career has been “best player in the world playing for one of the worst run franchises in the world.” The Bad News Bears are not that interesting when they stink and then continue to stink.
He actually decided to play for a terribly managed team so it feels fair to hold that against him. Baseball is a team sport, the point of which is to win the World Series. He has effectively removed himself from the point of baseball. Thinking that makes him less valuable is a valid point of view.
Part of this is that there’s a tendency, from the sabr perspective, to focus on individuals and lose the forest for the trees. In baseball the forest really isn’t a ton more than the trees (there are mostly little exceptions), but a big exception is the team you play on. The best player in a generation can’t bring their team to the World Series—they need a good team too.
Oh, it’s *that* Billy Hamilton (whom I admit I had never heard of prior to this article)
I will admit that I am more nervous about this than is perhaps justified. Perhaps that’s because Trout’s current closest JAWS comp is Joe DiMaggio, who was done after 13 seasons. Perhaps it’s because chronic foot problems are what shifted Albert Pujols into Ryan Zimmerman and Mark McGwire into retirement. Let’s hope that modern medicine is up to the task of preventing that.
My understanding from Jay’s piece is that they plan to remove the nerve in his foot, leading me to believe Trout shouldn’t have to deal with this particular issue ever again (at least in that foot).
But yeah… if this is a sign of bigger things to come — i.e. chronic foot problems — than yeah… very scary.
There is a common refrain about the truly great players that it is hard to realize that it won’t last, when you’re in the moment. Trout is now in his late 20s, and with or without the injuries the past three seasons, it should not come as a surprise if he does miss time going forward, or, and this seems crazy I know, his skills show some level of decline.
I’m stunned. STUNNED. All these comments and I am the first to acknowledge that I just learned his middle initial is “F”?……. MFT. H-m-m-m, I like that.
All these injuries that Trout keeps having are a bit maddening. My theory is that he simply weighs too much. All that running and sliding he does at his size takes its toll. His official weight is listed at 235 lbs but I think he’s probably closer to 245-246 lbs IMO. He lifts a lot of heavy weight from what I’ve seen in his training videos. That is a lot of mass to be carrying around at 6’2″. This will only get worse for Trout as he enters his 30’s.
I’ve had Morton’s Neuroma. It is very painful. I was a lean middle distance runner when I was younger (145 lbs at age 18). I took up running again in my early 40’s but I was much heavier. I got up to 226 lbs before I started running again but got down to about 202 lbs. Still, I am only 5’11” and after my last half marathon at age 48 my feet have had enough. The Morton’s Neuroma simply wasn’t going away without surgery so I decided to retire from running instead.
Bregman should accumulate enough WAR over the rest of the season to win. I remember thinking that (very loosely speaking) a player on a dominant playoff team (i.e. one with a huge lead, who would be extremely likely to make it even without that player) gets around a 1 WAR “bonus.” And if a player’s team barely makes it and they were pretty clearly the difference-maker, that ends up being something like a 2 WAR “bonus.” (Can’t remember if I read it here or not.)
By fWAR, that actually puts Trout, Bregman, and Semien neck and neck now. My guess is that even if Semien gets a bigger “bonus” it will be too hard for voters to overlook the better player (Bregman) who’s also on a playoff team.
If I was voting today, it would be Trout, Bregman, Semien. If they continue their season-long pace and end up as Trout (8.6 WAR), Bregman (7.9), Semien (7.3) then I think Bregman’s the winner.
I’d vote Bregman because it would give me thrills in the voting booth. Then I’d ask out the hot girl, and start that novel I’ve been running through my head the last 10 years. Exciting times!
If I voted for trout, I’m probably then just go home, check the weather, and call it a night at 8:30. Yawn!