The Weakest Positions on American League Contenders, 2024 Edition

Even with an extra day in February this year, Matt Chapman remains unsigned, his free agency having lingered past the start of exhibition season. Admittedly, the soon-to-be-31-year-old third baseman is coming off of an uneven season marked by a late slump related to a finger injury, but he’s been reliably productive throughout his seven-year career, with good-to-great defense bolstering his value at the plate. Meanwhile, his former (?) team, the Blue Jays — who reportedly offered him a nine-figure extension before he hit free agency — have cobbled together an uninspiring solution at third base.
Chapman isn’t the only remaining free agent who could provide a significant upgrade, but he’s by far the best position player remaining on the shelves, and the combination of his absence and the Blue Jays’ needs stands out as I turn to the American League edition of my roundup of the most glaring holes on contending teams (the National League edition is here). For this exercise, I’ve highlighted the spots that per our projections — which combine ZiPS and Steamer as well as playing time estimates from RosterResource — fall below a combined 2.0 WAR on teams whose Playoff Odds sit at or above 25%.
Why 2.0 WAR? That’s the rough equivalent of average play across a full season, but because of the general tendency to overproject playing time and keep even the weakest teams with positive WARs at each position (in reality over 10% of them will finish in the red), our position player Depth Chart values at the team level are inflated by about 20%. That is, instead of having a total of 1,000 WAR projected across the 30 teams, and 57% of that (570 WAR) allocated to position players, our Depth Chart values currently add up to about 682 WAR. Thus, I am discounting the team values that you see on the Depth Chart pages by 20%, and focusing on the lowest-ranked contenders among those whose adjusted values fall below that 2.0 WAR threshold. The individual WAR values cited will remain as they are on the Depth Chart pages, however, and it’s worth noting that many of the players here — particularly youngsters with shorter track records, including some from our Top 100 Prospects list — don’t project particularly well but still have considerable upside.
Why 25% as the cutoff for a contender? In the past — both for this preseason exercise and its older sibling, my annual Replacement Level Killers series, which doubles as something of a trade deadline preview — I’ve generally used a 10% chance of reaching the playoffs as the cutoff for what we might loosely define as a contender. However, this year’s odds are distributed such that only four teams (the A’s, Nationals, Rockies, and White Sox) fall below that threshold. Thus I’ve raised the cutoff to 25%, leaving the Angels, Pirates, and Royals below the bar but including the Red Sox (25.5% at this writing) and Reds (25.4%), both of which forecast for 80 wins. If you think it’s a stretch to call such teams contenders, consider that prior to Opening Day last year, the team that finished with the AL’s best record, the Orioles, had just a 10.4% chance of making the playoffs, while the NL pennant-winning Diamondbacks had a 15.3% chance, and the Marlins, who claimed the third NL Wild Card spot while going 84-78, a 23.6% chance. The same exercise for 2022 — the first year of the current 12-team format — would highlight the AL Central-winning Guardians (15.2%) and the Wild Card Mariners (22.8%).
Eagle-eyed readers probably noticed that the top NL teams, namely the Braves and Dodgers, didn’t have a single entry in the Senior Circuit edition, and neither did the Cardinals, whose 84.2-win projection ranks fourth in the league. For the AL edition, the same is true for the Astros, Yankees, Rays, Orioles, and Rangers — which is to say a majority of the eight teams that project to finish above .500. The ensuing roundup may feel like I’m picking on the fringiest contenders, but that’s part of the point: These are the teams for whom a marginal addition or even a modest breakout at these trouble spots could have a sizable impact on their chances of making the playoffs, not that I expect every team to pursue an upgrade.
With that preamble out of the way, I’ll go around the diamond. Unlike in the NL, where I was able to go two deep at every position, there’s enough talent at some of these spots that I could only cite one team that falls below the threshold.
Catcher
Red Sox (28th, 1.2 adjusted WAR)
The Red Sox got just 1.2 WAR out of their Connor Wong/Reese McGuire tandem last year, and despite a regime change, they’re content to stick with that plan because fixing things costs money, and this pair is making less than $2.5 million. After cups of coffee in 2021 and ’22, Wong — the last vestige of the Mookie Betts trade — stuck around last year, starting 105 games and hitting .235/.288/.385 (78 wRC+) while striking out one-third of the time; at least his 9.1% barrel rate offered some hope. Defensively, he was 9.6 runs below average in framing by our measure and five below by Statcast; the latter system did rate him at five runs above average in terms of catching baserunners stealing. McGuire, the older of the two by a year (he turns 29 on March 2) and the more experienced, made 51 starts last year and hit .267/.310/.358. His 78 wRC+ was identical to Wong’s and his 5.3% walk rate nearly so, but his 2.8% barrel rate a long way off. Defensively, he was about average across the board, which isn’t enough to offset his offensive deficiencies.
First Base
Twins (26th, 1.0 WAR)
Once again, Alex Kirilloff was beset by injuries; this time, it was a recovery from offseason right wrist surgery and a right (non-throwing) shoulder strain that limited him to 88 games, still his highest total in three major league seasons. His solid offense (.270/.348/.445, 120 wRC+) was alas offset by subpar defense (-8 DRS, -5 RAA). He’s reportedly healthy after undergoing a bursectomy in his right shoulder; thankfully his labrum and rotator cuff did not need repair. His struggles against lefties and his penchant for injuries led the Twins to sign 37-year-old switch-hitter Carlos Santana, who joins his sixth team in the past four seasons. He’s hit for a 113 wRC+ against lefties since 2020, but just an 87 wRC+ against righties. The projection suggests he’ll get far too much exposure, so the healthier Kirilloff is, the better.
Astros (24th, 1.0 WAR)
The first year of José Abreu’s three-year, $58.5 million deal resulted in a career-worst season, as he finished at .237/.296/.383 (86 wRC+) with -0.6 WAR even after digging out of an early hole. He increasingly struggled against fastballs, and set career lows in pull rate (33.9%) and average exit velocity (89.0 mph) while posting his lowest barrel rate (8.7%) since 2017. His work with hitting coach Alex Cíntron did pay dividends late in the year, especially in the Division Series, but he doesn’t inspire much confidence entering his age-37 season. Prodigal son Jon Singleton is the top alternative. His return from baseball oblivion after eight years out of the majors was a triumph, but he’ll have to do better than the .165/.267/.264 line he posted in 105 PA to stick, even as a reserve.
Second Base
Tigers (22nd, 1.8 WAR)
Colt Keith has yet to play in the majors, but the Tigers believe enough in the 22-year-old former fifth-round pick — no. 46 on our Top 100 — to have signed him to a six-year, $28.6 million extension in late January. They’ll give him a chance to win the second base job this spring, though he’s played more third than second in the minors. Keith’s a 30-grade defender at either spot due to throwing issues, though he projects to provide enough power to play every day, even as a DH. In his first taste of the high minors, he hit a combined .306/.380/.552 (140 wRC+) with 27 homers in 2023 split between Double- and Triple-A. The top alternative to Keith, whether he’s in the minors or DHing, is going-on-31-year-old utilityman Andy Ibáñez, who hit a respectable .264/.312/.433 (103 wRC+) last year, with 28-year-old utilityman Zach McKinstry, who hit just .231/.302/.351 (81 wRC+), also in the picture.
Shortstop
Guardians (23rd, 1.8 WAR)
Though Gabriel Arias received the bulk of the reps at shortstop after last summer’s trade of Amed Rosario, Brayan Rocchio has long been considered the better prospect and is the likely heir to the position. Rocchio, a 23-year-old switch-hitter, has been a 50 FV mainstay throughout his development, one who just placed 59th on our Top 100 list for the combination of his feel for contact, his pitch recognition, and his skill (if not his athleticism) at handling shortstop. He hit .280/.367/.421 (101 wRC+) at Triple-A Columbus last year but scuffled to a .247/.279/.321 (65 wRC+) line with a 31.4% strikeout rate and 4.7% walk rate in 86 PA for the Guardians; he chased a whopping 44.5% of pitches out of the zone. Though he could win the starting job out of spring training and projects for a 92 wRC+, he’ll have to improve his plate discipline to survive. The 24-year-old Arias, who hit just .210/.275/.352 (74 wRC+) last year while striking out 32.8% of the time — that 30-grade hit tool was no joke — will either be a backup or a stopgap who will settle back into a utility role if and when Rocchio is ready.
Third Base
Tigers (25th, 1.7 WAR)
Though 2022 first-round pick Jace Jung (no. 48 on our Top 100) is considered the third baseman of he future, he hasn’t played above Double-A and will start the year in the minors, leaving the Tigers planning for some kind of mix that may center around righty Gio Urshela, whom the team signed to a $1.5 million-plus incentives deal last week. The 32-year-old Urshela hit .299/.329/.374 (92 wRC+) — numbers that were well ahead of his Statcast metrics — with two homers in 228 PA last year for the Angels before fracturing his pelvis on June 15. His addition marks a departure from the plan as of December, when 27-year-old righty Matt Vierling was the favorite to start at third. Vierling hit .261/.329/.388 (99 wRC+) and played 35 games at the hot corner last year in addition to 130 in the outfield. The aforementioned McKinstry (a lefty) and Ibánez (a righty) could also be involved, depending upon how the second base situation unfolds.
Blue Jays (24th, 1.6 WAR)
Instead of re-signing Chapman, Toronto is cobbling together a lower-cost solution via free agent additions Isiah Kiner-Falefa and Justin Turner and holdovers Santiago Espinal and Cavan Biggio. The 28-year-old Kiner-Falefa, the best defender of the group, projects for the most playing time, but his .261/.314/.346 (82 wRC+) line for the Yankees last year was thoroughly representative of his offensive “skills” even with a career-best 3.1% barrel rate. The 38-year-old Turner has been an excellent hitter, but last year’s 114 wRC+ (.276/.345/.455) was his lowest mark since his Mets tenure, and it included just a 105 wRC+ against righties; what’s more, he played just 57 innings at third base, and his metrics were trending downward even before that. Espinal has fallen from a 115 wRC+ to 100 to 80 since 2021; last year, he managed just a 1% barrel rate. Biggio, the only lefty of the group, hit for a 103 wRC+ but has played just 65 innings at third over the past two seasons. Signing Chapman would clean up this mess while providing a boost in the competitive AL East, but it would push the team past the $257 million second tier Competitive Balance Tax threshold.
Left Field
Mariners (22nd, 1.3 WAR)
Seattle ranked sixth in the majors with 3.3 WAR from its left fielders last year, with Jarred Kelenic accounting for nearly half the playing time and value. Even given the protracted slump that followed his white-hot April (and a self-induced broken foot), it came as a surprise to see him traded in the name of salary relief. Replacing him is a mix headed by Luke Raley. The lefty-swinging Raley broke out in his age-28 season, hitting .249/.333/.490 (130 wRC+) with 19 homers and 14 steals overall, but he managed just a 93 wRC+ in the second half and struck out 31.5% of the time overall. While he hit lefties, the same can’t be said for 26-year-old lefty Dominic Canzone, who as a rookie batted .220/.258/.399 (79 wRC+) in 182 PA split between Arizona and Seattle. Yet another lefty, 26-year-old Cade Marlowe, could also figure in the plan, as could jacks of all trades Sam Haggerty, a 29-year-old switch-hitter, and Dylan Mooore, a 31-year-old righty.
Twins (19th, 1.5 WAR)
Last year, four different Twins played at least 40 games in left field, and all but Joey Gallo (now a National) figure to contribute this year. The likely starter is 26-year-old lefty Matt Wallner, who hit a beefy .249/.370/.507 (144 wRC+) with 14 homers in 254 PA as a rookie but struck out 31.5% of the time and went 5-for-42 against lefties. Neither of the other holdovers, 27-year-old lefty Trevor Larnach and 27-year-old switch-hitter Willi Castro (who managed just an 82 wRC+ against lefties), are good fits for a platoon, but freshly acquired 29-year-old righty Manuel Margot makes sense in that capacity. He hit for just an 84 wRC+ against lefties last year but owns a 109 career mark and a 115 mark for the past three seasons.
Center Field
Guardians (25th, 1.6 WAR)
Myles Straw totaled 5.3 WAR in 2021–22 on the strength of defense that was a combined 20–22 runs above average per DRS, UZR, and RAA, and despite plummeting from a 98 wRC+ in ’21 to 67 in ’22. His offense was still dreadful last year (.238/.301/.297, 69 wRC+) — he barreled just two balls — and with declining defense (his best showing was his 6 DRS), he totaled 0.4 WAR. Two alternatives could provide some punch for an outfield that totaled just 18 homers all season. Lefty-swinging former Yankees prospect Estevan Florial, now 26 years old, hit .284/.380/.565 with 28 homes and 25 steals at Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, but even amid a flood of injuries, the Yankees gave him just 71 PA, all in September, because he’d been removed from the 40-man roster. Twenty-nine-year-old righty Ramón Laureano hit a combined .224/.304/.371 (91 wRC+) with 1.0 WAR for Oakland and Cleveland. He played just 148.1 innings in center field, but as most of those came after the trade, the team seems comfortable putting him there.
Tigers (22nd, 1.8 WAR)
Riley Greene started 168 games in center over the past two seasons, but with the arrival of Parker Meadows in late August, the Tigers began experimenting with Greene in both corners before he tore the UCL in his left (non-throwing) elbow and underwent Tommy John surgery. The 23-year-old Greene, who hit a solid .288/.349/.447 (119 wRC+) before getting injured, might still spot in center but Meadows is slated to be the regular. The lefty-swinging 24-year-old hit .232/.331/.368 (94 wRC+) in 145 PA for the Tigers last year, following a modest .256/.337/.474 (99 wRC+) for Triple-A Toledo. Meadows doesn’t project as an impact player on the offensive side, but should be more than adequate in center while at the very least occupying the long half of a platoon. The aforementioned Vierling is the only righty among the top alternatives, though 23-year-old prospect Eddys Leonard, who hit .302/.374/.530 (123 wRC+) in 40 games at Triple-A after being purchased from the Dodgers, also fits that bill.
Right Field
Mariners (22nd, 1.1 WAR)
Mitch Haniger spent a miserable season in San Francisco, where he played just 61 games, missed four weeks due to an oblique strain and 11 more due to a fractured ulna that required surgery, and hit .209/.266/.365 (73 wRC+). Now 33 and back in the fold in Seattle, he’s played just 338 games while totaling 4.2 WAR over the past five seasons; it’s a stretch to expect him to replicate his 2018 or even ’21 production. The aforementioned Canzone, Haggerty, and Marlowe are the top alternatives. After a strong performance off the bench in 2022, Haggerty started slowly and was demoted to Triple-A Tacoma for over two months; following a strong mid-August return, he finished at .253/.364/.341 (108 wRC+) with 10 steals in just 108 PA. Marlowe hit a respectable .239/.330/.420 (112 wRC+) in 100 PA after Kelenic broke his foot. He’s a 35+ FV prospect whose speed is his only above-average tool.
Designated Hitter
Tigers (23rd, 0.8 WAR)
The end of the Miguel Cabrera era (CabrEra?) means that the team no longer has an aging superstar serving both as a set DH and a massive drag on the offense. The plan now is to rotate players through the spot, though the Opening Day DH and most likely go-to for manager A.J. Hinch is 26-year-old lefty Kerry Carpenter, who hit .278/.340/.471 (120 wRC+) season with 20 homers. He was around average at the outfield corners, where he played 91 games (80 in right), but with Meadows bumping Greene to a corner, there will be less demand for Carpenter’s glove. The aforementioned Keith could see substantial time here, as could newcomer Mark Canha, the other likely corner; the 35-year-old righty hit .262/.355/.400 (111 wRC+) for the Mets and Brewers last year.
Twins (16th, 1.0 WAR)
In an effort to keep the oft-injured Byron Buxton healthy, the Twins kept him from playing a single defensive inning last year, but the decision didn’t really pay off, as he hit just .207/.294/.438 (98 wRC+) and still missed 12 days due to a rib contusion and two months due to a hamstring strain. He’s slated to return to regular center field duty but still projects to spend more time at DH than any Twin within a rotation that could include just about every decent-hitting regular and part-timer, with Kirilloff and Santana, who already put a dent in this list above, the most likely alternatives after Buxton.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
I am actually kind of optimistic about Connor Wong this year. For whatever reason all of his struggles have come against left handed pitching. which he didn’t struggle against in the minors. He might be able to correct that.
respectfully, you wouldn’t be optimistic if you watched him day in and day out last year. maybe he’ll get to his power a little more, which would be nice, since he does have good raw power, but he is the kind of MLB hitter that genuinely would strike out against any pitcher at any level as long as they threw him a slider.
I watch just about every single Red Sox game and I don’t really see why Connor Wong would run a 22 wRC+ against lefties and a 99 wRC+ against righties, when he actually hit better against lefties in the minors. Not saying it will happen but it is definitely a possibility.
I’m very optimistic about Connor Wong being replaced by Kyle Teel sooner rather than later.
goodness a lot of al central in this list
When every team in the division is bad, everybody is a “contender.”
It really speaks to just how bad the Royals and White Sox are.
I’m shocked to not see the Yankees on here after the past few years. I guess when you stop penciling in Hicks, Cabrera, Franchy, etc into the opening day lineup for Verdugo, Grisham, Soto, etc, the floor is raised a bunch
Because the projection models rely too much from 2 and 3 yrs ago. None of the guys have adjusted their models either for years. They are drastically under valuing Orioles and Rangers who had a breakout last year……. and overvaluing Yankees and Mets for the same reason. Would also like to see models that take out the reversion to mean across the board.
sorry, can you be more specific? which players is the model under/over valuing?
When a player has a breakout year or a team does, you can’t revert to mean, or to what they did 2 and 3 yrs ago. They’ve changed pitches, pitch mix, changed their swing….could be anything. These models do not see that….they’re using historical data from 2-3 years ago.
Do you think the Orioles, Diamondbacks, and Rangers use the Fangraphs models? Not 1 of them had any of these teams winning their Division or Making the Wildcard last year.
Those 3 teams had breakout seasons pretty much top to bottom with a lot of their players. No big deal right….you think the models would correct for this in the preseason….WRONG. Not 1 of these 3 teams are projected win their division this year or make the playoffs. Not the Orioles, Rangers, or the Diamondbacks. Orioles are projected to finish 3rd same as the Rangers.
So do you think those 3 teams are using these models? ABSOLUTELY NOT, they’re antiquated. The basic 3 yrs to revert to the mean models we’ve been using on here for the last 15 years? Teams are so far ahead of this site its not even funny. This place was cutting edge 10+ years ago, but the models haven’t evolved or haven’t been updated.
Teams have hired away practically everyone and created super analytics. Its fun to look at here but not many put much weight into it outside of casual fans.
Same with the Yankees…..the models are ignoring their atrocious year last yr but since they had good years 2 and 3 years ago they’re going to win the division this year…ha. The weighting is incorrect…and the data doesn’t use statcast data, it doesn’t use xwoba.
I feel like it goes without saying that teams breaking out across the board and then overperforming their underlying metrics by over 5 games (O’s and D-Backs in this case) should be the mean projections for unfeeling computers. Not that any team except the Braves and Dodgers have mean projections good enough to win the divisions for real which is why mean wins to win the division and the mean wins for the top team in the division are two different numbers.
Also when did anyone say that none of these models use xwOBA? I’d think they’d use it excessively since its a predictive, comprehensive stat that only requires one number to be crunched which streamlines algorithms which, at least in the case of ZIPS, takes a few days to run. To this point, the Yankees are a team that not only got injured to hell and back last year, and underperformed their xwOBAs across the board, which would explain why their projections are so much better than you’d think they’d be if you just looked at 82-80 and concluded that the team was mid.
Lessee now. Dan, and the Steamer guy, and Nate Silver and all the followup Pecota guys, and Bill James, etc., etc., have all researched this. You, on the other hand, have ‘noticed’ things. You’ve done no research to show that the ‘reversion to the mean’ is passe or overdone. And such research would be simple to do.
As Dan points out, teams are still buying his research. He has evolved his ZIPs model year-in year-out in order to keep it as current as possible, in order to keep his $$$-making, how Dan continues to earn his living mode, current and valuable to those teams.
Really, Guru, are you a Putinbot?
I didn’t just make this up …..Unfortunately no one knows what I’ve researched or seen or who I work for. But it’s a fact …if teams like the orioles and rangers and dbacks were putting together their roster using fangraphs they’d be SOL
MBIC, neither the Orioles nor the rangers were mentioned as needing reinforcements via zips in this article
It seems you don’t really understand what is truly involved in a PROJECTION. There’s part interpolation (such as your “regression to the mean” mantra), and there’s also certainly EXTRAPOLATION too. They look at numbers in the minors, and the majors, and look at comparable career trajectories, in order to estimate what direction the player’s statistical curve is going to go. You seem to be narrowly looking at one PART of the process and then drawing unsupportable conclusions based on this. Are these models perfect? Of course not, but they are much better than the simplified description that you have used here. I think this is why you have gotten so many downvotes, not because people are defending Fangraphs at all costs.
Some breakout years are like that, but most players do regress after a better year than usual. The models will give more credit to younger players, for whom a breakout is more likely to be legitimate. Likewise, many players rebound at least partially after just one down year (with the likelihood once again correlated with age, as well as whether injuries were affecting them).
Besides, the models still weigh last season more heavily than 2 years ago, which in turn is weighted more heavily than 3 years ago.
To be fair, who would realistically have the D-Bax over LAD, or the Rangers over Houston. Orioles and Rays are probably on par with each other but I do understand your points with BAL.
It’s significantly overvaluing Carlos Rodon, other than that it looks normal to me.
Not sure why RF is rated higher than CF for the Guardians, tbh. Their right field options are just “whatever Florial and Laureano don’t do in Center, plus Will Brennan”. At least Straw’s defense gives them a floor up the middle.
Also, my faith in Rocchio as a current full-time option is nonexistent. He’s just not ready for MLB yet. Looked totally overmatched after his callup. It’s not even like Giminez, who looked way better after the initial terrible results. Rocchio is just not there yet.
I think Florial might finally do something with some runway in Cleveland. Certainly has more pop than the others, if he can make contact.
I like Florial, but my concern is that the RF setup is projected for less WAR than Center and without backups should the primary suck or get hurt.
Looks like there’s only 4 contenders without someone on the list – the Astros have 1st base here.
“For the AL edition, the same is true for the Astros, Yankees, Rays, Orioles, and Rangers “
[Jose Abreu has entered the chat]
That was my point – Jay has the Astros listed as one of the contenders that has no one on the list, but Abreu is there. (I just noticed that he is actually the picture at the top of the article, though I don’t know if Jay sees the picture before the article is posted.)
A couple basic questions:
Apologies about being complain-y!
I think the answer is that he only put the two worst for each position – the Twins and Astros both are at 1.0 WAR, so the Yankees don’t show up. We may get an article about the weakest positions on the contenders that don’t show up on their league’s list.
Yeah I don’t know why the Yankees aren’t here given that DC has them down for 1.7 WAR at first. Maybe Mr. Jaffe just has faith in Rizzo? I mean he did have an OPS near .900 before the Tatis incident.
The Tigers are an interesting high variance team playing in a weak division. They have now graduated most of their top prospects and it’s a matter of first health and hopefully growth.
Almost forgotten about Miguel Cabrera. He’s probably going to make the HOF first ballot, hasn’t been above .2 (as in “Point Two”) BWAR since 2016. Seven seasons! 49 total HR for a guy with 511 for his career.
Well, it’s not like Cabrera really needed the 500 HR benchmark (nor the 3,000 hit benchmark) to still be an easy choice for the Hall of Fame.
Not that it really matters, but I don’t understand how the Tigers are 25th in 3rd Base with 1.7 WAR if the Blue Jays are 24th with 1.6.
No Yankees, No O’s. Going to be a crazy race for the ALE!
“the last vestige of the Mookie Betts trade“
Payroll flexibility flies forever, Jay.
It feels like it kind of defeats the purpose of this article to include the Tigers, even if they are expressly “contending”. Because obviously they are a very weak squad.
This write up seems to destroy the hopes of the Tigers barring a fluke.
Every hole except third base is filled with a young guy with upside. For a team that was always going to need breakouts from young talent to make a push I don’t think this article was particularly damning. They definitely should have been in on Chapman though.
The thing about Gabriel Arias is that he has an extreme reverse platoon. So far he has a 119 wRC+ against righties but a wRC+ of just 1 against lefties. No idea why. He’s a right-handed batter so you would expect the opposite. He could be a decent player if he just hit lefties better.
FYI. Myles Straw added 10 pounds of muscle. He’s hitting 30 home runs this year. #springtraininghope
#bestshapeofhislife
While the Tigers are really not a contender,(shocked SS with Baez wasn’t listed) the DH # seems very low considering they have 2 guys with wRC+ last year of 111 and 120 slated for pretty much all of the DH AB’s.
Agreed, but they are inexperienced so potentially some upside? Actually was shocked Baez was not on here. He was horrible all of 2023.
I think some projections are over valuing Trevor Story and that there is at least a fifty fifty chance that he ends up below 2 war and none of the other options for SS are likley positives. I hope I am wrong but..
Lots of discussion about possible platoons. Are those accounted for in the projections?
Jays could have used the money they spent on IKF and Turner, and they would have had Chapman for a year. I’m sure he’d cost a couple more years too, but that would have been more worthwhile than what they did. And their DH would be the same or arguably better if they just used Jansen as the primary DH, or a Vogelbach platoon. Or many other alternatives. What an awful offseason they’ve had.
To be fair, nobody expected Chapman to be on the market this long with his price likely dropping greatly when he does sign. The same is true for the teams who have already gone elsewhere for their starting rotations despite Snell and Montgomery likely to be relatively nice bargains.
What was the rush to sign IKF? The Jays signed Turner late in the offseason. Could have got Chapman in early Feb. Knowing be had limited suitors. Or made a deal like Bellinger with opt outs at less term for Chapman.
They don’t get the benefit of a “to be fair” argument when they unnecessarily rushed signing players they didn’t need when better players were available.
You said the same is true in AL of the Astros, Yankees, Orioles, Rays, & Rangers of not having a position listed, yet you listed the Astros at first base.
The red sox are contenders?