2020 Trade Value: #31 to #40
While a shortened season might make this year’s version of our Trade Value Series an unusual one, with the deadline looming, we are not about to break with tradition. For a more detailed introduction to this year’s exercise, as well as a look at those players who fell just short of the top 50, be sure to read the Introduction and Honorable Mentions piece, which can be found in the widget above, along with the other installments in the Series.
For those who have been reading the Trade Value Series the last few seasons, the format should look familiar. For every player, you’ll see a table with the player’s projected five-year WAR from 2021-2025, courtesy of Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections. The table will also include the player’s guaranteed money, if any, the year through which the team has contractual control of the player, last year’s rank, and then projections, contract status, and age for each individual season through 2025, if the player is under contract or team control for those seasons. Last year’s rank includes a link to the relevant 2019 post. Thanks are due to Sean Dolinar for creating the tables in these posts. At the bottom of the page, there will be an updated grid showing all the players who have been ranked up to this point.
With that out of the way, let’s get to the next 10 spots on this year’s list.
| Five-Year WAR | +16.4 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2024 |
| Previous Rank | #39 |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 29 | +3.9 | Pre-Arb |
| 2022 | 30 | +3.7 | Arb1 |
| 2023 | 31 | +3.5 | Arb2 |
| 2024 | 32 | +2.9 | Arb3 |
After ranking 39th on this list last year, Jeff McNeil finished the 2019 season with the same hot bat he started it with on the way to a 4.6 WAR campaign. Given roughly a season and a half of big league plate appearances, McNeil has a stellar 139 wRC+, and his 7.3 wins pro-rate to roughly five wins per 600 plate appearances. Those results might urge for moving him up rather than down, but there likely wouldn’t be significant interest in McNeil’s skillset if he were offered in trade. He isn’t great anywhere defensively, though he is versatile and has experience at second base, third base, and both corner outfield spots. He has average to slightly above average power, but he does make a ton of mostly-medium hard contact. He also needs those hits to continue to fall, and might be more vulnerable to increased shifting. A player with that power profile who relies on solid contact to get on base and who is without a true position probably won’t inspire teams to trade away a bunch of their prospects to acquire him, but McNeil gets results.
Maybe he is undervalued by the industry as a whole. He’s making the minimum through next year, likely won’t earn big salaries in arbitration, and won’t be a free agent until after the 2024 season. Those arbitration years all come in McNeil’s 30s, limiting his upside. McNeil hits and plays multiple positions well enough to make him a desirable player, but continued questions about his future production have driven his trade value below some less-accomplished players.
| Five-Year WAR | +16.4 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | $22.8 M |
| Team Control Through | 2024 |
| Previous Rank | #40 |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 28 | +3.0 | $6.5 M |
| 2022 | 29 | +2.9 | $6.8 M |
| 2023 | 30 | +2.8 | $8.5 M |
| 2024 | 31 | +2.3 | $10.0 M |
Coming off a solid, 2.7 WAR 2018, the Twins and Max Kepler agreed to a contract extension that guarantees the outfielder $35 million for five years, with a $10 million team option on the 2024 season, just $9 million more than the $1 million buyout for that year would be. In 2019, Kepler had the breakout season many had been expecting for years, nearly doubling his home run total from 20 in 2018 to 36 in 2019. The increase in power saw his wRC+ go from average to 121, and his WAR totaled 4.4 on the year. Kepler is a good outfield defender. He draws walks and doesn’t strike out much. Even if his 2024 option is exercised, he will earn just under $32 million over the next four seasons.
Kepler had some support to be even higher on this list. The concerns that held him back were mostly age-related given his type of production. At 27 years old, it’s possible that his defense has already peaked, and since his fly ball swing produces a lot of outs, his low batting average will suppress some of the value of his good walk rate. His breakout produced a good batting line, but not a great one. The last year of his contract and the option season both occur in Kepler’s 30s. He’s a good player and a very good value, which is why he’s on this list, but Kepler’s skills are more solid than spectacular and the pandemic might have wiped out most of what would have been his best season.
| Five-Year WAR | +13.5 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | $18.3 M |
| Team Control Through | 2025 |
| Previous Rank | #38 |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 27 | +3.0 | $4.3 M |
| 2022 | 28 | +2.9 | $5.5 M |
| 2023 | 29 | +2.7 | $7.5 M |
| 2024 | 30 | +2.7 | $10.5 M |
| 2025 | 31 | +2.2 | $12.0 M |
Like Kepler, Jorge Polanco is 27 years old and had a four-win breakout in 2019 buoyed by a batting line that was about 20% above league-average. They signed their contracts at the same time, but are slightly different. Polanco only has three more guaranteed years instead of Kepler’s four, but the former has two options which provide an extra year of team control. Even with the two option years, Polanco is set to earn under $40 million from 2021-2025. That extra year of control with the slightly lower guarantee pushed Polanco slightly ahead of Kepler.
Polanco’s main issue at the moment is his below-average defense at shortstop. He’s passable there, but he might be a better fit at second or third base, struggling as he does with throwing and balls hit to the hole between shortstop and third base. It’s possible that Josh Donaldson displacing Miguel Sanó could help Polanco some, but he either needs to clean up his throwing issues or be next to a good third baseman to stick at the position. While moving positions likely wouldn’t negatively affect his WAR as long as he was close to average, it might diminish his value in trade. He’ll need to keep his bat above average to keep his value regardless of position, but his contract is too good to keep him from sliding down this list any further.
| Five-Year WAR | +14.7 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2024 |
| Previous Rank | #HM |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 26 | +3.3 | Pre-Arb |
| 2022 | 27 | +3.1 | Arb1 |
| 2023 | 28 | +2.8 | Arb2 |
| 2024 | 29 | +2.8 | Arb3 |
Is Austin Meadows the former top-prospect who put up a 142 wRC+ and 4 WAR at 24 years old? Certainly. Was Meadows also a top prospect for years longer than he should have been because he couldn’t stay healthy, then played less than a full season a year ago due to a sprained right thumb? Yes, he is. Those I spoke with definitely saw Meadows more in the former category rather than the latter. In 2015, he played in 127 games and received 584 plate appearances. He spent the next three seasons averaging under 400 PA and 100 games per season. His performance suffered a bit with his various hamstring and oblique injuries, but he’s crushed the ball since coming over to Tampa Bay in the Chris Archer deal. He’s not the best outfielder, but he is playable and the bat should continue to make up for deficiencies elsewhere. Meadows will make the minimum again next year before hitting arbitration in 2022. There are still some injury concerns, but none of his prior ailments have long-term implications and he’d still be a quality player even if he ends up resigned to a designated hitter role.
| Five-Year WAR | +14.1 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2024 |
| Previous Rank | – |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 26 | +3.0 | Pre-Arb |
| 2022 | 27 | +2.9 | Arb1 |
| 2023 | 28 | +2.8 | Arb2 |
| 2024 | 29 | +2.7 | Arb3 |
Ramón Laureano’s emergence caught me by surprise. His highlight reel throws grab your attention, but they mask mediocre range that keeps him closer to average in the field. If we were to look at Laureano’s stats on July 1 of last year, we’d see a 4.5% walk rate, a 27.8% strikeout rate, a .183 ISO, average exit velocity of 90.1 mph and a 98 wRC+ in 331 plate appearances. He only got 150 PA after that due to a stress injury to his shin that caused him to miss the month of August, but his numbers were impressive. His walk rate increased to 8% while his strikeout rate declined to 20.7%. His ISO was a mammoth .352 and he maintained an 89 mph exit velocity while making a lot more contact. His 189 wRC+ during that time turned an average season into an All-Star-level performance. He’s continuing to draw walks this season, a good sign for his future. He can still play center field and is a very good baserunner. He just turned 26 last month, will continue to make the minimum for another season after this one, and won’t be eligible for free agency until after the 2024 season. Laureano’s arm makes you notice, but his production at the plate is on the rise and deserves more attention.
| Five-Year WAR | +12.8 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | $23.5 M |
| Team Control Through | 2023 |
| Previous Rank | #HM |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 30 | +3.7 | $9.0 M |
| 2022 | 31 | +3.2 | $13.0 M |
| 2023 | 32 | +2.6 | $13.0 M |
Over the last two years, Max Muncy’s 10 wins rank 15th among all position players. For those players with at least 1,000 plate appearances in that time, his 5.6 WAR/600 PA ranks eighth behind only Mike Trout, Mookie Betts, Christian Yelich, Alex Bregman, Anthony Rendon, Matt Chapman, and J.T. Realmuto. Muncy’s production has been right up there with the best players in the game and he’s guaranteed just $20.5 million over the next two years with a third-year option for the Dodgers at just $11.5 million more. A bargain deal and great production is on the good side of the ledger for Muncy, but he’s not without some negatives. He bloomed late so he’ll turn 30 later this month and these next few seasons aren’t likely to be as good as the last few. He also more of a modern second baseman, helped by heavy shifting rather than inherently good fielding. Those factors don’t negate Muncy’s bat, but they do serve to drive down his value some compared to what you might expect given his recent track record of production.
| Five-Year WAR | +19.6 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2025 |
| Previous Rank | #HM |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | +3.9 | Pre-Arb |
| 2022 | 25 | +4.0 | Pre-Arb |
| 2023 | 26 | +3.9 | Arb1 |
| 2024 | 27 | +3.9 | Arb2 |
| 2025 | 28 | +3.9 | Arb3 |
While passing around this list for feedback, there was a general consensus that Yordan Alvarez was in the wrong place. Where that consensus crumbled was on whether Alvarez was too high or too low. His 178 wRC+ over roughly half a season was an incredible hitting performance, even if he’s reduced to the designated hitter spot. Alvarez struggled in the playoffs with an 80 wRC+ over 65 plate appearances. Still, even with those playoff numbers, Alvarez put up a 163 wRC+ for the season, which is really good. There’s also his history of knee issues, and even though he is just 23 years old, Alvarez has a big body and there are questions about how well he will age. But it’s not hard to see why his power and offensive production so far outweigh concerns about his October showing or the continued potential for injury, especially when combined with his league-minimum salaries through 2022. Putting that type of bat in a lineup transforms it, and teams will happily give up good prospects and players for great, cheap production.
| Five-Year WAR | +19.6 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2023 |
| Previous Rank | #HM |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 26 | +4.3 | Arb1 |
| 2022 | 27 | +4.1 | Arb2 |
| 2023 | 28 | +3.8 | Arb3 |
Lucas Giolito was once a top prospect, but his value didn’t match his ranking when he was included in the Adam Eaton trade four years ago. He underwent Tommy John surgery just as he signed his first contract with the Nationals, which might have tamped down his value then. His development in the majors was slow prior to a breakout 2019 campaign, when he struck out 32% of batters on his way to a five-win season. He focused his fastball usage to the four-seamer and increased the use of a changeup to get batters out. He’s a fly ball pitcher, but induces weak contact; only Clayton Kershaw had a higher percentage of infield fly balls last season. Giolito turned 26 years old last month and he’ll be arbitration-eligible at the end of this season. In creating this list, it became pretty clear that good young pitchers with multiple years of team control are in short supply. There’s always going to be more of a risk with pitchers, particularly those with a short track record of success like Giolito. But there are a decent number of veterans with big contracts and a healthy number of unproven prospects, but not many pitchers in between, creating a solid value for guys like Giolito.
| Five-Year WAR | +14.6 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2023 |
| Previous Rank | #50 |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 28 | +3.3 | Arb1 |
| 2022 | 29 | +3.3 | Arb2 |
| 2023 | 30 | +2.9 | Arb3 |
Speaking of young pitchers with three more years of team control, Luis Castillo may be a couple of years older than Giolito, but the Reds’ righty also had a breakout season in 2019 after pitching his first full season the year before. Castillo struck out 29% of batters last season and pairs those whiffs with an elite groundball percentage due to a high-90s sinker. That combo helps keep the ball in the park even when pitching in Cincinnati, and it is stuff that would translate anywhere. His changeup is his out pitch, inducing a swing-and-miss a quarter of the time he throws the pitch. He’s followed up his 2019 season with an excellent start to 2020. He’ll be arbitration-eligible at the end of this season, but his short track record of success will keep his salaries relatively low the next few years. He’s currently in a very good rotation alongside Trevor Bauer and Sonny Gray, but Castillo might be the team’s best pitcher. By our rest-of-season projections, he’s one of the top dozen pitchers in baseball.
| Five-Year WAR | +18.3 |
| Guaranteed Dollars | – |
| Team Control Through | 2023 |
| Previous Rank | #49 |
| Year | Age | Projected WAR | Contract Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 27 | +3.9 | Arb1 |
| 2022 | 28 | +3.8 | Arb2 |
| 2023 | 29 | +3.8 | Arb3 |
It’s fairly unusual for an established player to jump as many spots in these rankings as Matt Olson did; losing a year of team control as salaries are expected to rise makes it difficult to see an increase in trade value. But Olson’s wRC+ jumped from 118 in 2018 to 134 in 2019, which meant a four-win season in only 547 plate appearances. He has elite exit velocity, with his 92.8 mph average seventh in the game last year. Because he’s able to get the ball in the air consistently, he makes good use of that hard contact and cranks out a ton of homers, even playing in Oakland. Olson is also a fantastic fielder, winning the last two Fielding Bible awards. He only has three more years before free agency, but those years should be among his best as he’s still just 26 years old. I initially had a more modest move up the list in mind, but multiple front office sources indicated he was still too low, and there was some support to move him even higher. First base production has declined over the last decade compared to the rest of the league, with a 108 wRC+ the last two seasons, a five point drop from the previous five years, which that makes Olson’s production more impressive. The offense-defense combo at first base might make him underrated publicly, but he has incredibly high value for those in the industry.
| Rk | Pv | Player | Age | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | 49 | Matt Olson | 26 | +3.9 Arb1 |
+3.8 Arb2 |
+3.8 Arb3 |
||
| 32 | 50 | Luis Castillo | 27 | +3.3 Arb1 |
+3.3 Arb2 |
+2.9 Arb3 |
||
| 33 | HM | Lucas Giolito | 25 | +4.3 Arb1 |
+4.1 Arb2 |
+3.8 Arb3 |
||
| 34 | HM | Yordan Alvarez | 23 | +3.9 Pre-Arb |
+4.0 Pre-Arb |
+3.9 Arb1 |
+3.9 Arb2 |
+3.9 Arb3 |
| 35 | HM | Max Muncy | 29 | +3.7 $9.0 M |
+3.2 $13.0 M |
+2.6 $13.0 M |
||
| 36 | – | Ramón Laureano | 25 | +3.0 Pre-Arb |
+2.9 Arb1 |
+2.8 Arb2 |
+2.7 Arb3 |
|
| 37 | HM | Austin Meadows | 25 | +3.3 Pre-Arb |
+3.1 Arb1 |
+2.8 Arb2 |
+2.8 Arb3 |
|
| 38 | 38 | Jorge Polanco | 26 | +3.0 $4.3 M |
+2.9 $5.5 M |
+2.7 $7.5 M |
+2.7 $10.5 M |
+2.2 $12.0 M |
| 39 | 40 | Max Kepler | 27 | +3.0 $6.5 M |
+2.9 $6.8 M |
+2.8 $8.5 M |
+2.3 $10.0 M |
|
| 40 | 39 | Jeff McNeil | 28 | +3.9 Pre-Arb |
+3.7 Arb1 |
+3.5 Arb2 |
+2.9 Arb3 |
|
| 41 | HM | Adley Rutschman | 22 | +1.6 Pre-Arb |
+2.0 Pre-Arb |
+2.2 Pre-Arb |
+2.3 Arb1 |
+2.5 Arb2 |
| 42 | 28 | Joey Gallo | 26 | +2.4 Arb2 |
+2.4 Arb3 |
|||
| 43 | 16 | Shohei Ohtani | 25 | +2.3 Arb1 |
+2.2 Arb2 |
+2.1 Arb3 |
||
| 44 | HM | Nate Pearson | 23 | +1.8 Pre-Arb |
+1.8 Pre-Arb |
+1.7 Arb1 |
+1.6 Arb2 |
+1.6 Arb3 |
| 45 | – | Jesús Luzardo | 22 | +1.7 Pre-Arb |
+1.9 Pre-Arb |
+1.6 Arb1 |
+1.6 Arb2 |
+1.5 Arb3 |
| 46 | HM | Keston Hiura | 23 | +3.0 Pre-Arb |
+3.1 Pre-Arb |
+3.2 Arb1 |
+3.2 Arb2 |
+2.8 Arb3 |
| 47 | HM | Mookie Betts | 27 | +6.2 $22.9 M |
+5.9 $22.9 M |
+5.7 $25.4 M |
+5.1 $30.4 M |
+4.4 $30.4 M |
| 48 | 24 | Jacob deGrom | 32 | +4.6 $37.5 M |
+4.1 $37.5 M |
+3.8 $34.5 M |
+3.5 $32.5 M |
|
| 49 | 19 | Xander Bogaerts | 27 | +4.1 $20.0 M |
+3.9 $20.0 M |
+3.7 $20.0 M |
+3.2 $20.0 M |
+2.5 $20.0 M |
| 50 | HM | Dustin May | 22 | +2.4 Pre-Arb |
+2.3 Pre-Arb |
+2.3 Arb1 |
+2.3 Arb2 |
+2.3 Arb3 |
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
Thank you Craig, very cool!
Have a hard time believing Matt Olson, a good but not elite bat at 1B, is a top 31 asset with 3 years and two months left of control. Even with 1B offense not being what it once was. Also, most of the contenders have solid to good 1B play.
I tried to look for an opposing argument here, but it’s awfully hard. The Rays would be a great fit, but that would be a very un-Rays move. The Phillies might be a logical fit by making Hoskins a full time DH, as they could go for it this year with the Mets and Nats struggling.
But it does seem odd to put so much stock in a surge in offense that for the position might be more “really good” than great, and without a contract and knowing how arbitration favors Olson’s profile more than others.
Counter-argument… maybe teams are starting to quantify just how valuable elite 1B defense is in terms of runs saved by converting outs and ending innings, and how rare it is to find elite 1B defense in the same body as a top-quality bat. I’ve always felt that WAR undervalues elite defensive first basemen because the broad positional adjustment assumes that there are a ton of replacement level 1B out there. But this misses the mark – finding an elite defensive 1B who can also hit is ridiculously valuable compared to a bat-only 1B. Keith Hernandez, for example, remains significantly undervalued in his era for being an elite defensive 1B who could also hit.
(Basically, I think elite defenders should have some sort of logarithmic adjustment to value if they handle the stick well.)
Agree! And I am not smart enough to figure this out myself, but I suspect Olson’s D benefits the rest of the Oakland infield in ways that doesn’t show up in his WAR. He’s turned plenty of off-the-mark throws from Chapman and Semien into outs.
The thing about saving other infielders from errors is that the fans of every team seem to think that their first baseman is the best at it.
Ha – good point. But I think it’s more obvious when it’s not your team. I’m not an A’s fan but I love watching Olson play 1B. But I grew up watching and emulating Keith Hernandez so I truly “learned” from the best!
As a Yankees fan, I can comfortably say that no one on the current roster is good at it. Even LeMahieu –whom you’d think would be good– is not.
Agreed. Not that he was super great with the stick, but I’ve always had a hard time believing James Loney’s negative dWAR numbers.
The value is relative though. If first baseman defense is a commodity, and there aren’t a ton of appreciable differences between first basemen… even if it’s a hard position you can replace them from within the pool of first basemen available relatively easily even if you can’t replace them from The pool of other players at other positions. The mechanism that would result in this is despite the position’s difficulty, the league is really good at training first basemen. I’m not saying that’s true, it’s just how something like this would happen. That would necessitate a negative adjustment.
I agree that value is relative. What I am saying is that if any skill is scarce, the existence of that skill has logarithmic value. I think that elite 1B defense is a skill that is scarce – there is a high volume of players within some range, and then a tiny number of players that are several standard deviations away from that range. Their non-linear difference compared to their peers should show up with non-linear adjustments to their WAR. I believe this is true across all sorts of skills and would need to change if the skill were no longer scarce.
Also I would imagine that Olsons bat isn’t a finished product yet. The power he showed when he came back from a hamate injury last year was incredible, and it just seems like there is more there.
Just scrolling to the bottom and looking at the chart, it’s hard to look at that information and think Olson and Alvarez should not be swapped.
Muncy, like Gallo yesterday, feels too high. Career high 162 wRC+ in 2018 and down to 134 last year for a sub-par defender heading into his 30s. He’s a really nice player with a team friendly deal but we’ve also seen peak Muncy and I don’t think he’d net most of the top 50 sitting behind him in a 1-for-1 trade when considering age, team control, and position (which I am aware the rankings are intended to account for).
I’m also struggling to see Matt Olson so high. Another guy I like as a player but he’s probably roughly Muncy’s equal right now (which is somewhat generous given Muncy’s track record). Granted they are on different trajectories in their career at this point so there’s upside to continue to dream on so I don’t think we’ve seen peak Olson quite yet (and a super low BABIP is preventing us from appreciating Olson’s improvements in chase and walk rate this year). But if Muncy is too high I don’t think Olson’s track record justifies his placement either.
I actually think Muncy is quite a bit more valuable than Olson because of positional flexibility. They’re similar offensively, but Muncy gives better OBPs and can play 3B/2B as well. Maybe not great, but faking a position with the shift is still valuable. I’d probably put Muncy in the 40-50 range. But a 4-5 WAR infielder who can play the corners and fake second is pretty valuable. Would I trade a young pitcher who’s flashed in the MLB like Dustin May or Jesus Luzardo for him? Probably not. But if you’re the Dodgers would you trade him for a young pitcher? Also probably not since they need his bat. Good thing the Dodgers don’t have to worry about that though…
I love the “Max Muncy Story”. If there was a website where graphs were made, I’d make mine with a list of players on the bottom for one axis, and the other axis would be a scale of how much I’d like to see a movie made of their road to the bigs. That graph would have the Max bar be the tallest bar possible, just above Ron LeFlore – if such a story could even be believed. If only there was a site with graphs…
Given the chance, the Dodgers would trade Muncy, straight up, for Matt Olson, right now. Most any team would. Olson is clearly more valuable.
It is far from very clear, it’s basically a wash (which, surprisingly, is what Fangraphs says as well).
Muncy has elite plate discipline and an edge there over Olson, and comparable power in his bat (Olson’s peak power is definitely higher but Muncy has been very consistently good at hitting HR). Olson can play 1B, and that is it. Muncy offers roughly average defense at a number of positions. They’re fairly simliar players, but there are things Muncy can provide that Olson cannot, and vice versa.
Matt Olson is a lot better at defense then you are giving him credit for. I know it’s hard to picture, but he can play 3rd base apparently as well.
I wonder how far Vladito will fall. Out of the top ten?
I’d have a major problem with a 1B/DH in the top 10, even with the elite prospect pedigree.
And let’s be honest, even though he’s crazy young the results have just not been good so far
This may be a question of the philosophy of this whole exercise. GMs would probably universally salivate at the idea of getting Guerrero, even if he hasn’t been good yet, he was that hyped. So if the question is what GMs are willing to pay, it’s probably quite high. If it’s his true prospective value, maybe not so much.
Yup. “Trade Value” and “Results To Date” are not the same thing.
It is a little weird how that salivating is magically reduced a bit once the player is actually in MLB. Stalled MLB prospects fall in the in-between where they are less attractive to teams that are in contention because they can’t just wait for you to come around and are less attractive to rebuilding teams because by the time they may be useful to actual winning games that matter there are fewer years and at higher costs.
Would a rebuilding club rather have Tolkerson or Vlad? Would a competing club rather have Olson or Vlad?
Is it weird, or natural? Vladito is a good example. He has not adjusted to the league adjusting to him. He also has shown that he’s a 1B/DH only type, validating the low-end expectations on the defensive spectrum. “Trade value” would have to seem to include those two realities that are unknown before a player makes their debut.
Now, don’t get me wrong – Vladito is 21 years old and has a 103 wRC+ in his first 600 MLB PA’s. He’s still a pup, he’s got some bad batted ball luck right now, and I still think he’ll mash.
To answer your question, though, if I were a competing club, I would take Olson over Vlad in a heartbeat. If I were a rebuilding club… man, I think I’d take Tork but only because he’s a year younger on the calendar, has an extra year of control, and I believe will be the better defender at 1B. But that’s not any knock on Vlad by comparison. Tork is going to be special.
In this instance it’s completely natural because we’ve seen issues with conditioning, body weight, defensive lapses, and a middling offensive presence. It’s a testament to Vladito’s potential that despite having what most would categorize as a very low end start to this career he’s such a desirable player. That said if I was a GM I’d see the weight issues as a huge red flag. We’ve seen very little positive momentum in that department and with so much at stake it’s kind of baffling.
Nobody in the industry will say it but Vladito is giving signs that he is a potential bust. You are giving him a lot of rope if you even consider him a 1B/DH. Early career DH is his only true position. He is looking like a contender for the title of worst defender I have ever seen. In just the few times i have watched him play, more like stumble, around the bag he has made three egregious errors, completely missing the easiest type of pop fly and booting two very routine grounders. His bat hasn’t exactly lived up to the hype either, and that is giving him the benefit of doubt because he is still very young.
I think when you drop a year of control and fall way short of expectations, then you have to fall. I’d be surprised if he isn’t in the next post.
It wouldn’t surprise me if he stayed in the top 10 with his prospect pedigree. He only had 1 down year as a rookie. Trout and Betts are on monster contracts in a time when teams are not as profitable. The guys ahead of him last year have less team control. I think a lot of teams would take a chance on his potential.
I love Kepler, Meadows and Laureano’s presence on this list. I am less excited about Alvarez, he’s a DH only guy who broke out in the year of the crazyball. I also would think long and hard about ponying up what it’d take to acquire Giolito. Sure, he was pretty good last year, but this is the same guy who came in dead last in ERA in 2018 by a mile, is not looking as good in 2020 (for whatever that’s worth), and was very up and down in 2019. You are basically banking on three dominant months vs. years of futility.
Alvarez might already be a legitimate top-15-ish bat in the league right now. And at only 23 years old I’d be inclined to have him much higher in these rankings than somewhere in the 30s, even with no defensive value to speak of. I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to imagine his career exceeding that of David Ortiz, who put up multiple 5+ WAR seasons as a DH and probably deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.
Well, not right now since his knees don’t work.
Actually, what I *will* say on Alvarez’ behalf is that I don’t see his value differing in any meaningful way from Guerrero’s, now that the latter has moved off of 3B, other than simply prospect pedigree.
Giolito breaking out isn’t exactly a surprise, though. He was an very highly rated prospect at one point— before it was known that he needed Tommy John, he was a candidate to be the first ever HS RHP to go 1-1 in the draft. This year he hasn’t consistently found the command that he had last year, which isn’t a surprise given no run-up to the season. Consistently might not be the word— he’s just really lacking his command in the first inning this year.
“I am less excited about Alvarez, he’s a DH only guy who broke out in the year of the crazyball when he knew what pitch was coming.”
FIFY
For some reason I can’t quite articulate, I really appreciate the perfunctory swapping of Jeff McNeil and Max Kepler at 39 and 40 from last year.
Small gripe, but Jeff McNeil is probably one of the least shiftable batters in the majors. He literally surveys the infield before he steps in the box to see how the defense is positioning him. When they leave a huge hole where there shortstop is, he visibly adjusts his swing to try to pepper the ball through the shortstop hole. He has good enough bat control to pull it off a lot of the time.
I’d be more concerned with the reckless abandon he plays with and his lengthy injury history than him becoming vulnerable to shifts.
He has that reputation, but the reality is that he pulled the ball 46% of the time last year, one of the highest pull rates in baseball
Pull rate against shift is 35%. The 46% is irrelevant to the argument that he adjusts against a shift.
35% isn’t a low number
Alvarez is criminally under rated here likely due to him being on the villians du jour.
lmao
Just me or is this a very underwhelming 31 to 40