Tommy La Stella is Doing Mike Trout-like Things
Just as we all predicted in spring training, Tommy La Stella has taken over the Angels’ lead in home runs, surpassing Mike Trout. Wait, what?
You’re forgiven if you haven’t been paying much attention to the Angels, who are 20-22, haven’t been more than a game above .500 all season, and are now more than a month removed from their last time at that plateau. Trout was impossibly hot to start the season, but he cooled off, and Shohei Ohtani only made his 2019 debut last week, albeit without the novelty of double duty due to his Tommy John surgery. The Ohtani-less rotation has been dead-last dreadful, with practically everybody carrying ERAs and FIPs in the 5.00s, 6.00s, and 7.00s, or else on the injured list, and there’s been no heroic career turnaround for Matt Harvey, to say the least. Albert Pujols just passed the 2,000 RBI milestone, but he’s a shadow of his former self, and who cares about RBI, right?
Into this less-than-compelling spotlight has stepped La Stella, a 30-year-old lefty-swinging infielder who entered this season best known for his pinch-hitting prowess (.278/.397/.386 in 193 PA) and the Cubs’ gentle handling of his mid-2016 walkabout, the kind of thing that could have ended his career. The Angels acquired him last November 29 in exchange for a player to be named later (lefty reliever Conor Lillis-White) who has yet to throw a competitive inning in 2019, and are paying him all of $1.35 million. In our preseason Positional Power Rankings, we forecast La Stella to receive just 77 plate appearances as the Angels’ second baseman behind David Fletcher, with another 105 at third base behind Zack Cozart, and 14 at designated hitter. Given that he’d hit just 10 homers and produced a 96 wRC+ (.264/.345/.366) and 2.0 WAR in 947 career plate appearances — including just one homer and an 86 wRC+ in 192 PA last year — he wasn’t on anybody’s radar as a potential impact player.
Thanks to injuries sustained by Cozart and left fielder Justin Upton, and the versatility of Fletcher (not to mention his own), La Stella has secured more playing time than expected, and he hasn’t wasted it. He’s started a total of 31 games, 26 against righties. He’s made 24 starts at second, six at third, and one at DH, while pinch-hitting just three times. In 127 PA, he’s hit .278/.366/.574 with 10 homers, matching his previous career total and overtaking Trout, who has nine. Here’s Monday night’s opposite field shot off the Twins’ Jose Berrios, a blow that proved to be the game-winner:
La Stella’s 10 home runs are tied for 12th in the AL, while his 154 wRC+ trails only Trout (169) among Halos hitters. So, what accounts for his metamorphosis into a slugger? Mainly, it’s the by-now-familiar tale of a player adjusting the plane of his swing to more consistently barrel the ball and hit it in the air. A month ago, shortly after a three-homers-in-two-games outburst against the Brewers, The Athletic’s Fabian Ardaya described La Stella’s work with the Angels’ hitting coaches:
The utility infielder has worked to adjust his bat path with hitting coaches Jeremy Reed, Shawn Wooten and Paul Sorrento, becoming more efficient in getting the barrel to the ball while also adjusting his hands. In a small sample, La Stella has increased his average launch angle from 8.1 degrees to 13.9 degrees, which is more typical of a power hitter.
You Aren't a FanGraphs MemberIt looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:✓Ad-free browsing✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles✓Historical & platoon projections✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps✓One-click data exports✓Customizable player-page dashboards✓Dark & Classic site modes✓Weekly Members-only mailbag✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review✓Optional homepage photo removal✓Gift articles to non-membersInstead of gripping the bat tight and “muscling” the baseball, La Stella worked to become more relaxed, using his good eye, solid approach and natural strength to swing at damageable pitches and trust his natural power instead of forcing it.
Now, I’m by no means an expert in breaking down a player’s swing mechanics, and with La Stella’s limited body of work, matching pitch type, location, hit type, and camera angle for optimal A-to-B comparisons isn’t helping, but even so, it’s not hard to see some differences between the 2018-model La Stella and the 2019 one. Here are a pair of singles on pitches in Gameday Zone 8 (lower middle):
In the 2018 clip, from May 13 against the White Sox’s Bruce Rondon, La Stella starts his swing standing very tall, with his bat quite upright. In the 2019 clip, from May 1 against the Blue Jays’ Marcus Stroman, he begins with his knees a bit more bent, and his bat is definitely starting from a lower angle. For what it’s worth, I can find 2018 hits where he’s less upright, with the bat pointed somewhere between those two extremes; this one’s from August, but he’s back to being very upright in this one from September.
As noted, La Stella homered once last year, on August 30 against the Braves’ Mike Foltynewicz. The knees a bit more bent than the 2018 single above, but the bat is still upright:
And here’s his April 9 homer off the Brewers’ Freddy Peralta. More crouched, with the bat at the lower angle:
Note that he’s a bit more upright in the Berrios homer near the top of this article, but the lower bat angle remains, and the swing path is different from where it was last year.
[Update: Multiple writers caught on to La Stella’s powering up at about the same time I did, including Baseball Prospectus’ Matthew Trueblood and the Orange County Register’s Jeff Fletcher, both of whom had the opportunity to converse with La Stella about his propensity for adjusting his stance. “Over the last few years, even at-bat to at-bat, with my stance and my setup, whatever felt right in the moment, I would go with,” La Stella told Trueblood. Via Fletcher, the hitting coaches scoured video to find what they believe to be La Stella’s optimal setup, “standing taller, knees hardly bent at all, with his bat at about a 45-degree angle on his shoulder.” Said La Stella, “On video, it may not be as athletic of a position, but it’s comfortable for me, which allows my swing to work the way I want it to.”]
Prior to this season, La Stella, who’s listed as 5-foot-11, 180 pounds, had earned a reputation not for his power but for his combination of patience and contact ability, which suited him particularly well off the bench; he walked in 10.6% of his plate appearances while striking out in just 12.6%. He owned a career 45.2% groundball rate and a 1.50 groundball-to-fly ball ratio; last year, he’d set career highs with a 52.8% mark and a 2.27 ratio. This year has been a different story; he’s been putting the ball in the air more frequently, and his groundball rate has dipped to 39.0%, with a 1.05 ratio. When he pulls the ball (45.8% last year, 41.0% this year), his rate of doing so on fly balls has more than tripled, from 7.7% to 24.4%.
La Stella’s average launch angle through Monday was up to 15.2 degrees; the year-over-year increase was tied for 10th:
| Rk | Player | Team | 2018 BBE | 2018 LA | 2019 BBE | 2019 LA | Dif |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ian Desmond | Rockies | 414 | 0.0 | 86 | 11.6 | 11.6 |
| 2 | Gary Sanchez | Yankees | 231 | 14.2 | 64 | 25.2 | 11.0 |
| 3T | Adam Eaton | Nationals | 257 | 7.1 | 127 | 16.6 | 9.5 |
| 3T | Austin Barnes | Dodgers | 134 | 4.4 | 77 | 13.9 | 9.5 |
| 5 | Corey Seager | Dodgers | 85 | 9.6 | 107 | 18.1 | 8.5 |
| 6 | JaCoby Jones | Tigers | 289 | 12.0 | 56 | 19.9 | 7.9 |
| 7 | Maikel Franco | Phillies | 374 | 9.5 | 129 | 17.3 | 7.8 |
| 8T | Christian Yelich | Brewers | 441 | 4.7 | 106 | 12.3 | 7.6 |
| 8T | Rosell Herrera | Marlins | 224 | 2.2 | 59 | 9.8 | 7.6 |
| 10T | Tommy La Stella | Angels | 142 | 8.1 | 95 | 15.2 | 7.1 |
| 10T | Dee Gordon | Mariners | 490 | 3.5 | 121 | 10.6 | 7.1 |
For La Stella, that’s paid off greatly; through Monday, among players with at least 150 PA last year and 100 this year, his 251-point increase in slugging percentage (from .331 to .583) ranked second to Cody Bellinger’s 302-point increase. From the list above, Sanchez was sixth with a 225-point increase, Yelich 17th with a 147-point increase.
What’s particularly interesting about La Stella’s newfound power is that he’s also become even more disciplined and contact-oriented. Of the 187 players with at least 120 PA through Monday, his 18.8% chase rate ranked seventh, his 3.3% swinging strike rate — that’s one whiff for every 30 pitches — and 6.6% strikeout rate both third. The Angels dominate that particular region of the leaderboard; Fletcher (1.8%) and Mike Trout (3.7%) also ranked in the bottom four in swinging strike rate, and Fletcher (5.8%) and Andrelton Simmons (6.5%) were the only players with lower strikeout rates than La Stella. Here’s a fun scatter plot:

La Stella is the red dot, Trout the yellow one, and Mookie Betts is in purple; Michael Brantley is the blue dot partly occluded by La Stella. That’s good company.
Even with sketchy defense (-0.8 UZR split between second and third bases, albeit in ridiculously small sample sizes), La Stella has already set a career high with 1.3 WAR. He’s by no means the first journeyman to alter his swing and see a radical improvement in his results, and he won’t be the last, but it’s nonetheless fascinating to see such turnarounds, one season and one batter at a time.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Yikes at 2018 Ian Desmond.
LaStella as this year’s Max Muncy or Daniel Murphy. Good stuff!
Correction to your first video clip: LaStella went the other way against Bruce Rondon, not against White Sox CF Leury Garcia.
LOL yes. The caption for the video reads “a line drive to left fielder Leury Garcia,” and all I absorbed was the name, without thinking twice. In my defense, I was cleaning toddler vomit up at 4:30 AM, hours before filing this, but still, E-6.
E-6 for title of a gif, gold glove for handling your child’s vomit at 4:30 a.m.
Re: your SwStr vs SLG chart, Alex Verdugo missed the cutoff by 2 PA’s and has a .541 SLG with a 4.5% SwStr% which would fit right in the Trout/Mookie/Brantley/LaStella neighbourhood. What do you think about his prospects?
“his 3.3% swinging strike rate — that’s one whiff for every 30 swings”
Minor nit-pick. It means one whiff every 30 pitches, rather than 30 swings. He’s actually whiffing once for every 12 swings, which is still quite good and would rank 3rd in the league if he qualified. 4 of the top 7 in MLB are Angels, in fact.
It really is quite amazing how hard he’s hitting the ball while being elite in terms of contact. He’s turned himself into Mike Trout for a month, basically.
Subtle quibble: Since that table of “Largest Increases in Average Launch Angle” doesn’t include results, I looked them up. Six of those 11 hitters have a worse wRC+ this year.
To be fair, the group’s collective performance is undoubtedly better. But some readers may jump to conclusions, since only the three biggest gainers were called out by name, for their big rise in SLG (La Stella, Sanchez and Yelich). No mention of the big dropoffs by Adam Eaton and JaCoby Jones, or medium drops by Maikel Franco and Ian Desmond.
Nor does the conjunction of batting gains and increased LA always mean correlation. Dee Gordon’s improvement from last year owes as much to his .321 BA on ground balls as it does to his more-and-better air balls (which include way more pop-ups). He’s been this good before, and better, with much less hard contact and far more ground balls.
Every article noting a batter’s improvement accompanied by a big rise in launch angle is an implicit endorsement of that trend. That may be sound theory generally, in the sense that collective gains outweigh the losses. But there’s still a wide range of individual outcomes, and it would be good to mention that fact more often. Jay did say, “For La Stella, that’s paid off greatly,” but rarely are those for whom it fails detailed here.
Any position player in the majors has a swing that works pretty well for him. Jackie Bradley Jr. is currently the worst qualified batter in MLB, with a 149/258/184 line, if you don’t think that’s good, try imagining what the average fan or amateur would do. I suspect my line would be roughly 000/100/000, with the 100 being entirely walks.
149/258/184 is an elite athlete who’s put a lot of time and effort into trying to get this right for him. Hitting is hard, MLB players are mostly very good at it.
Substantial changes to the swing are thus pretty much by definition messing with something that works pretty well, to try to get something even better. It seems to me that such changes should be expected to fail at least as often as they succeed. That it works well within the first year even ~half the time would tend to indicate that trying it is a pretty good idea. (OTOH, is it sure that all 11 players listed have actually changed their swings? This is still pretty small sample size, some of those launch angle changes may just be luck.)
Trout-like things? Has he cured the sick with his touch?
After today’s game La Stella has passed Trout in wRC+.
They have two Trouts, and they’re still below .500!? Ouch.
Two Trouts but zero pitchers.
The pitchers pitches look as big as Trouts🤓
As a Cub fan, color me skeptical that a supposed swing change has made Le Stella into a top 1% hitter in MLB in only a season. I’ve actually liked Le Stella but when we lost him I didn’t think it was a thing. Seeing him perform this way for in 2019 makes me wonder how nice it would be to have that production on the Cubs currently instead.
But two quick things.
1) Isn’t it a bit early still to be declaring transformed hitters through swing changes. Small sample size and all. I mean in all of April, Heyward was finally looking like the monster hitter we’ve been waiting for, yet has regressed majorly fairly quickly.
2)Le Stella BABIP is only .222 as I write this. So he has even more in the tank as he should start to get some better luck!
Le Stella: a French Tommy
Go Tommy Boy!
One last comment, damn the Angels management for starting a season with that pitching staff. I want to see Trout play in October and he has some other hitters around him this year even if by pure luck!
Cool stuff!
It’s amazing to see his numbers now. I remember when he was with the Braves (they drafted him in the 8th round in 2011) and despite him not being very exciting, even then his walk/strikeout rates were excellent (10% and 11.1% respectively in 2014).
That ’14 season was his only big league season with Atlanta (93 games) and he hit 1 home run… LOL. Now he has 10 in 2019! Even more, he’s batting .301 and his BABIP is 46 points lower than his career average. I bet he’s loving the combination of a very lively ball and his new approach to hitting.
This guy has always been good, from the day he was traded from the Braves to the Cubs. Every year he plays he puts up good numbers. Good to see him finally getting a chance at a starting job, I hope he keeps it and gets some of the recognition he deserves. This is the type of guy you want on your playoff team.
The launch angle change seems to be fueling this, but is there any concern that it’s not sustainable with an Exit Velocity in only the 39th percentile and a Hard Hit % in the 31st percentile? It seems to me a launch angle change without above average exit velocity would result in a lot of deep outs.
Tommy La Statcast baby!