Szymborski’s 2021 Bust Candidates: Hitters
Last week, we looked at my favorite breakout candidates for the 2021 season. Today, we shift to the players I’m more bearish about, and I’m not talking about pilfering picnic baskets. Whether it’s players who I don’t believe will match their 2020 performance, meet their 2021 projections, or who have some aspect of their game that worries me, each of these eight hitters is one who I would place firmly in the “sell” column. That doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll be awful or bad, but it does mean I don’t think the best is yet to come.
José Abreu, Chicago White Sox
Busts are a relative notion, and a player can make this list and still be a contributor. Abreu was terrific in 2020 and is one of the few players in baseball you could inarguably call a leader, but the fact remains that it was by far his best performance in years. Sure, he pasted the ball to the tune of the 10th-highest average exit velocity in the league, but he destroyed baseballs in 2018 and ’19 as well and was far less valuable in those full seasons. Abreu’s far more likely to be an average player than he is to contend for the MVP again, and when you have a guy whose WAR projection for an entire season comes in under his 60-game WAR from last year’s short season, who you have to admit he has some bust potential. That’s doubly true when he’s in his mid-30s; sluggers aging like Nelson Cruz are the exception, not the rule.
Percentile | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90% | .295 | .351 | .580 | 562 | 85 | 166 | 40 | 3 | 38 | 134 | 40 | 116 | 3 | 148 | 4.2 |
80% | .287 | .339 | .536 | 565 | 81 | 162 | 38 | 2 | 33 | 127 | 37 | 123 | 2 | 134 | 3.2 |
70% | .283 | .334 | .518 | 566 | 80 | 160 | 36 | 2 | 31 | 121 | 36 | 128 | 2 | 128 | 2.7 |
60% | .278 | .328 | .505 | 568 | 78 | 158 | 35 | 2 | 30 | 118 | 34 | 132 | 1 | 123 | 2.3 |
50% | .276 | .326 | .491 | 568 | 76 | 157 | 34 | 2 | 28 | 114 | 34 | 136 | 1 | 119 | 2.0 |
40% | .274 | .323 | .478 | 569 | 75 | 156 | 33 | 1 | 27 | 112 | 33 | 141 | 1 | 115 | 1.7 |
30% | .272 | .320 | .463 | 570 | 74 | 155 | 32 | 1 | 25 | 108 | 32 | 146 | 1 | 110 | 1.4 |
20% | .270 | .317 | .454 | 571 | 73 | 154 | 31 | 1 | 24 | 105 | 31 | 152 | 1 | 107 | 1.1 |
10% | .265 | .310 | .429 | 573 | 70 | 152 | 29 | 1 | 21 | 102 | 29 | 160 | 0 | 99 | 0.6 |
Jackie Bradley Jr., Milwaukee Brewers
The popular conception of JBJ is that he had something of a comeback season in 2020, and that’s true on the surface, as his wRC+ of 120 was 30 points above anything he’s done in recent years. The only problem with that part of the tale is that in this case, his .343 BABIP, 45 points above his career average, was the driver of his flashy line. Remove that and his season looked a lot like 2019, when one of the questions entering the offseason was whether the Red Sox would even tender him a contract for 2020. From the specific hit data, ZiPS thinks that he played like a player with a .306 BABIP rather than one in the .340s. He’s still a solid defensive player, but his speed numbers are starting to slip, which tends to be a leading indicator of defensive decline for an outfielder. The relatively small outfield in Milwaukee isn’t the best park to take advantage of JBJ’s talents; his defensive performance would have been more welcome in places like San Francisco or Kansas City. All that said, I should note that ZiPS disagrees with me on this one.
Percentile | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90% | .243 | .336 | .476 | 456 | 72 | 111 | 25 | 3 | 25 | 63 | 56 | 118 | 16 | 111 | 2.9 |
80% | .240 | .328 | .444 | 459 | 70 | 110 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 59 | 53 | 125 | 13 | 102 | 2.3 |
70% | .239 | .324 | .427 | 461 | 69 | 110 | 23 | 2 | 20 | 57 | 51 | 131 | 11 | 97 | 1.9 |
60% | .236 | .321 | .422 | 462 | 68 | 109 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 55 | 50 | 134 | 11 | 94 | 1.8 |
50% | .233 | .317 | .413 | 463 | 67 | 108 | 22 | 2 | 19 | 54 | 49 | 138 | 10 | 91 | 1.5 |
40% | .232 | .313 | .402 | 465 | 66 | 108 | 21 | 2 | 18 | 53 | 47 | 143 | 10 | 87 | 1.4 |
30% | .230 | .309 | .393 | 466 | 66 | 107 | 21 | 2 | 17 | 52 | 46 | 147 | 9 | 84 | 1.1 |
20% | .229 | .305 | .378 | 468 | 65 | 107 | 20 | 1 | 16 | 50 | 44 | 154 | 8 | 80 | 0.8 |
10% | .227 | .300 | .357 | 471 | 63 | 107 | 20 | 1 | 13 | 48 | 41 | 163 | 6 | 73 | 0.4 |