Josh Bell, Now With Power

Freeze baseball at the end of last year, and Josh Bell fit into an ignominious archetype. A former top prospect, he’d fallen into the power-light first base role previously occupied by the likes of James Loney and Sean Casey. The good power vibes from a homer-happy 2017 (26 dingers, .211 ISO) had faded after his slap-hitting 2018 (12 home runs and a .150 ISO). FanGraphs’ Depth Charts projections penciled him in for a .172 ISO and a wRC+ around 113 — roughly average offensive production for a first baseman.

If that projection was surprising, it was only because Bell looks the part of a slugger. At 6-foot-4 and 235 pounds, he’s an imposing presence at the plate. His minor league numbers had never showed great thump — his best showing was a credible .173 ISO with 14 homers in 2016. After that 2016 season, Eric Longenhagen graded him as having 50 game power — dead average, with the chance to improve to a 55 eventually. Bell’s frame always carried the promise of greater power numbers, but neither scouts nor projection systems thought it was a likely outcome.

That’s all well and good, but uh, have you seen Josh Bell’s 2019? He’s recorded a ludicrous .364 ISO, fifth-best in the majors. He already has 14 home runs and 14 doubles (and, perplexingly, two triples), besting last year’s home run output in only 188 plate appearances. This prodigious power, along with a .366 BABIP, has propelled him to a 185 wRC+, third-best in baseball. The power that was promised by Bell’s physical gifts has finally come in, and it’s come in all at once.

When someone puts up a line like Bell’s (an ISO that looks like a BABIP, a season-long wRC+ higher than any previous month of his career), my natural inclination as an analyst is to look for flukes. Maybe he’s hitting an unsustainable number of line drives, or 75% of his fly balls are turning into home runs. Perhaps he’s faced abysmal pitching in hitters’ parks. Surely any of those explanations is more likely than a sudden, real power spike that dwarfs his previous career.

Indeed, Bell’s HR/FB% is a lofty 29.8%. That probably sounds fluky to you, given that the major league average, even in these home run-crazy times, is around 14%. To that, I would merely say: Have you seen Josh Bell’s home runs? Most batters can sneak a well-hit ball out of the park. But Bell isn’t hitting home runs that tickle the top of the fence on their way over. Of his 14 home runs, 11 have been hit more than 400 feet. Take a look at where his second-shortest (yes, second shortest) home run landed.

X marks the spot, and if you can ignore my shaky penmanship, it’s immediately apparent that Bell isn’t hitting cheapies. Statcast confirms that Bell is obliterating the ball — of the 154 players with five or more home runs this year, his home runs have the 13th-highest expected slugging percentage. In other words, these balls are home runs basically all the time.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

What has Bell done to achieve these lofty power numbers? There’s a common thread that across many batter breakouts these days, one Craig Edwards has written about on a near-daily basis this year. Batters who decrease their out-of-zone swing rates prosper. Stop swinging at garbage, start drawing walks and swatting dingers. As neat and tidy of an explanation as that would be, though, that’s not Josh Bell’s deal. Swing at fewer pitches out of the zone? Bell is swinging at more. Take more walks? Bell is drawing them less often this year. Cut down on strikeouts to force pitchers to challenge you in the zone? Bell’s swinging strike rate and strikeout rate are both career highs.

Alright then, it’s not a plate discipline story. Maybe it’s a fly ball revolution story! Those are everyone’s favorite. Is a swing change that unlocked Bell’s innate power the takeaway here? Well, that depends on what you mean by a swing change.

Bell’s lefty swing (10 of his 14 home runs are from the left side of the plate, and that’s what I’ll be focusing on for this analysis) has always been a mess. Don’t take my word for it, though. Here’s Longenhagen again in his scouting report on Bell:

“Bell hit well as a lefty despite extremely inconsistent footwork, striding closed and getting his foot down early at times and employing a big, slow leg kick at others. These changes appeared game to game, swing-to-swing and clearly screwed with Bell’s timing, which led to some pretty ugly hacks, but Bell’s prodigious physical talent allowed him to succeed in spite of this.”

Maybe you are a visual learner. Maybe “inconsistent footwork” doesn’t paint a mental picture for you. You’re in luck. Here’s Bell in 2018.

Here’s Bell, also in 2018.

Not convinced yet? Here’s a variation on that second stance — different bat angle, different front foot placement, same Josh Bell.

All three of those pitches ended in extra-base hits, but Bell’s mechanics seemed invented on the spot from day to day. Even within a stance, Bell’s mechanics were widely variable. Watch his hands before a double off of Jack Flaherty.

Goodness gracious. Bell was mostly able to make this work (he had a 112 wRC+ last year, after all), but with such complex timing mechanisms, he wasn’t always making the kind of contact he wanted. This mechanical inconsistency led to a lot of mis-timed swings, and that led to a lot of grounders — Bell had a career 50% groundball rate as a left-handed batter after the 2018 season.

Bell made finding a consistent batting stance a priority in the offseason, and it shows. Here’s Bell before a pitch this April.

The thing is, that could be Bell before a pitch at any point this year. He’s stuck with one stance for all of 2019. This version of Josh Bell is mechanically much simpler. Take a look at his hands on the same pitch, a pitch he hit a monumental 474 feet.

There’s no twitchy timing mechanism, no need to find the correct hand load point before starting to swing. It’s quiet and simple, and Bell knows it. “There’s not a lot of redirection with my movements when I’m synced up,” he told Ron Biertempfel when discussing his hot start.

The results speak for themselves. Bell has dropped his lefty groundball rate from more than 50% to 37%. He’s increased his hard contact rate (again lefty) from 33.6% to 53.3%. He’s been a barrel monster so far this year — per Baseball Savant, he racked up 20 barrels as a lefty last year, or 6.7% of his batted balls. He has 18 already this year, or 20%. His average exit velocity on fly balls and line drives is up from 94.2 mph to 98.8 mph. In other words, the new Josh Bell is a fearsome slugger.

Not much else has changed, because a consistent stance and swing seemed to be all Bell needed to unlock his inner Judge. He’s swinging a little more this year — swinging more at fastballs, breaking balls, and offspeed pitches alike. He’s swinging more in the zone, and he’s swinging a bit more out of the zone. He hasn’t even really changed his attack zones — he likes pitches high in the zone, same as always. The main difference has just been topped groundballs turning into towering home runs, which is a nice switch to make.

Don’t tell yourself that Bell has feasted on weak competition, either. That’s an easy narrative to believe if you don’t look at it too closely — Bell plays in the NL Central, which means frequent dates with the Cardinals, Cubs, and Brewers. All three of those teams, the Cardinals in particular, have had pitching issues at various points this year. There’s just one problem with this narrative — it’s not true.

To test this flimsy supposition, I looked at every pitcher Bell had faced this year and calculated their wOBA, both before and after stripping out Bell’s plate appearances against them. I then weighted these wOBA’s by the number of times he’s faced each pitcher. The results? Bell has faced pitchers who have compiled a .316 wOBA this year, essentially equal to league-average. Remove Bell from the equation, and those pitchers look even better — a .308 wOBA. In short, he hasn’t benefited from an easy slate of pitching. If anything, his opponents have been a hair better than average. So much for that angle.

It’s been a tough few years to be a Pirates fan. The Longenhagen scouting report I quoted comes from FanGraphs’ 2017 prospect list. Bell was fourth on that list, behind power arm Mitch Keller and Archerian compatriots Austin Meadows and Tyler Glasnow. If watching those two light up the AL East hasn’t been tough enough, the Pirates have had to contend with owner Bob Nutting’s parsimony and two straight fourth-place finishes in the competitive NL Central. So far this season, however, Pirates fans have a new star to cheer. Now, it’s early yet. Bell hasn’t had time to have a slump and question his mechanics — his worst 10-game stretch still amounted to a 125 wRC+. At some point this year, he’ll struggle. That’s the nature of baseball’s interminable season, of doing an incredibly difficult task six days a week for months on end. When that happens, look to his batting stance. For now, though, Bell has calmed himself down and started crushing baseballs to all fields. If he can maintain his gains, he’ll have given the Pirates a fearsome bat in the middle of the order for the foreseeable future. Josh Bell cleaned up his mechanics, and now, the world is his oyster. Long may he reign.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
EasyenoughMember since 2016
7 years ago

This is one of the few baseball truisms that works in life: “be still.”

DGLewisMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

The Ransom Olds formula for success: Simplicate and add lightness.

ThrasiusMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  DGLewis

Uhhh, you mean Colin Chapman?

DGLewisMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Thrasius

Upon further review, it appears to have actually originated with William Bushnell Stout, the developer of the Stout 3-AT, a predecessor of the Ford Trimotor.

szielinskiMember since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Not too long ago, Bell looked like he sffered seizures during his PAs. I worried that he, like Jose Batista, would have is eureka moment while playing for another team. Pirates fans have had too many of those in the recent past.

kozy21
7 years ago

Hopefully the Buccos finally have themselves a slugger. They haven’t had a 40-homer hitter since Stargell in 1973. You talk about his stance change which is funny because his nickname in the locker room was Tinker Bell. He’s a good interview and an easy dude to root for. Hopefully this is the new Bell because he’d be a great “Face of the Franchise” in Pittsburgh.

MichaelMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  kozy21

If you like Stargell read his autobiography. The story of his youth is amazing. Also, he’s half Native American which most people do not realize.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

I don’t think it’s that crazy to think that he has been hitting triples. If he’s getting to much of his power from the left side, he’s probably pulling at least a few balls right down the right field line, the right field fence at PNC is fairly tall (although I don’t remember how big it is in center-right) and I seem to recall it’s a pretty spacious set of outfield corners, meaning if the right fielder is positioned wrong he could easily struggle to get to the right spot. On top of all that, Josh Bell isn’t exactly a slowpoke, as his sprint speed last year was 27.1, which puts him about league-average (264 out of 477 of a minimum of 25 attempts). He’s not Mallex Smith but it’s also not crazy to think he has a couple of triples in his pocket.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

FWIW one of Bell’s triples this year was to center and one to left. On the one to center (at PNC) the CF fell down briefly and Bell motored into third (https://www.mlb.com/video/zack-godley-in-play-run-s-to-josh-bell); the other one at Nats Park was a sinking liner that the LF dove for and missed (https://www.mlb.com/gameday/pirates-vs-nationals/2019/04/13/565901#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=565901 at 2:30).

He had ten triples the past two seasons though, so you’re right, it’s not atypical for him. (Maybe I should’ve checked that before I looked up the videos.)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

So I was right in the big picture, even if I was wrong in the specific case. I’ll take it!

MichaelMember since 2016
7 years ago

I’ve been going to Pirates AA team games for 10+ years and have seen many Eastern League prospects (except Vlad Jr who was injured). Bell hit the ball harder than any prospect I’ve ever seen. He just didn’t have any loft.

Thom with an HMember since 2017
7 years ago

He’s hit four homers over 450 ft, including two over 470. No one else has come close to doing that this year.

dcweber99
7 years ago

As a Pirates fan, it’s really hard to get excited about Bell because he’s now priced himself out of Bob Nutting’s range. He’s a lot of fun to watch, but I don’t think I want to get as invested as I was between 2013 and 2015. I know that Nutting will not invest in the big league club or in minor league development to the level needed to truly contend again, and I know that Huntington and Searage have been exposed as having some fatal weaknesses- they’ve both had some huge triumphs in the past, but I think the combination of Archer/Cole/Morton/Glasnow is showing that there is a disconnect between what NH values and what Searage is comfortable working with. Even if Nutting authorizes trading for or signing a pitcher, how can be sure that it’s not going to be a disaster?

deweyi
7 years ago
Reply to  dcweber99

Im not sure the Cole trade will be looked on as bad for us. Musgrove, Moran, Martin, and if Feliz can get his head out of his ass, there is some good potential there.

DavidMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  deweyi

Moran hasn’t really shown anything though; a league average bat last year and a little below this year with no defensive value. For a team that preaches they don’t believe in windows spreading the wins they could’ve received from one guy over three and a prospect doesn’t scream like a good idea, unless their goal is to win in 2020 over 2018 and 2019, but that doesn’t fit with the Archer and Kela moves. And even more, like dcweber99 states, looking at how Cole, Chuck, and Glasnow have flourished after leaving, that might be a bigger indication on why the deal looks bad.

dcweber99
7 years ago
Reply to  deweyi

Musgrove has been good, for sure, and Martin should have a long career, plus I liked Feliz initially, but control has escaped him. The problem with the perception of the trade is that they didn’t get a single top-tier prospect for either Cole or Cutch- since the Liriano salary dump in 2016, NH’s moves haven’t done very much to inspire hope. Instead it feels like he’s just trying to tread water at .500, and that’s their problem- even if many of the moves are sound in theory, they’ve lost tens of thousands of fans because of the appearance of futility.

kozy21
7 years ago
Reply to  dcweber99

I think the Cutch trade looks excellent. Bryan Reynolds has been raking so far and looks like he might be replacing Corey Dickerson already and Kyle Crick has been one of the best relievers in the NL. Reynolds has 0.7 fWAR in 80 PA’s and Cutch has 1.0 fWAR in 203 PA’s. He has a significantly higher wRC+ at 141 compared to Cutch’s 114.

6er
7 years ago
Reply to  kozy21

And Mason Martin is showing some real power and some clutch late inning heroics in Greensboro.

kozy21
7 years ago
Reply to  6er

It was Jason Martin that was included in the Cole trade. Mason Martin was drafted by the Bucs in the 17th round of 2017. Jason Martin has already had a cup of coffee in the majors this year.

Darkstone42
7 years ago
Reply to  deweyi

I think the Pirates do well in the Cole trade just by merit of having a solid to good starting pitcher in Musgrove in the rotation when Hayes and Keller are up. Cole would have been done in Pittsburgh this year. Hayes and Keller will make their impacts in 2020. Having another good arm in the rotation (and bench bat in Moran, and maybe another solid bench bat in Martin, and Feliz still has nasty stuff and could put it together) will make it easier to properly complement those potential stars.

John Autin
7 years ago

There are many ways to describe Bell’s improvement. One broad description is that he needed to stop focusing on contact for its own sake, and start focusing on damage. And that he has, as shown in his “counts” data and K rates:

In 2017-18, Bell’s 18.4% K rate was better than 63% of the top 200 in PAs.
But he got few of the benefits high contact can bring.
Among the top 100 by non-K%, he ranked:
— #75 in BA, .258 (median .276)
— #49 in SLG, .440
— #45 in OPS, .785
Overall, his batting was below the median for first basemen.

Part of the problem was in HOW he managed to avoid strikeouts.
There are two main prongs to that approach:
1) Make contact once you reach 2 strikes.
2) Avoid 2-strike counts.
Bell was MUCH better at putting 2-strike pitches in play than he was at avoiding those counts:
— His share of 2-strike counts was almost 51%, near the median.
— His 2-strike contact rate was much better than *before* 2 strikes (relative to other hitters).
But his 2-strike RESULTS were strictly average, which means terrible.
All of which builds the impression that he was “selling out” for 2-strike contact, while not doing enough damage before those counts.

And suddenly, this year, he’s flipped that narrative:
— Once at 2 strikes, he’s a K machine, dropping from top third to bottom quarter in K% of 2-strike counts; BUT …
— He’s avoiding 2-strike counts MUCH better, up to #34 in lowest share of PAs.

How is he avoiding 2-strike counts? Obviously, by attacking EARLY:
— 33% of his PAs have been settled at zero strikes, compared to 22% the past 2 years.

But since 2-strike counts still make up 46% of his diet, it’s crucial that he’s also shown much more power with 2 strikes, lifting his ISO from .095 to .187, from #133 to #32. Since his prior contact-based 2-strike approach wasn’t achieving much, it would make sense if he’s decided to just “let it rip” regardless of the count.

And while his overall K rate is up to 21.8%, a bit worse than the median, that’s nothing worrisome.

Francis C.
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

We have to be aware that pitchers will not be attacking him the same way they have been for these first 6 weeks. He was not a feared hitter based on last year’s results but now he is. He will have to work on his plate discipline as pitchers will throw him less strikes early in the count going forward.

RonnieDobbs
7 years ago

Where there is a player having success, there will be a bunch of people trying to profit from it themselves through analysis. This was a guy that advanced metrics were attempting to bury a month ago lol. You could point to literally anything as the source of his gains. All he had to do was hit better – Statcast confirms this!

Barnard
7 years ago

Great article, dude is absolutely mashing baseballs and it’s so fun to watch. Surprised you didn’t sneak in the infamous anonymous scouting take on Bell:

“Josh Bell can’t play. He’s not a good defender. He’s a big lump. He has bad agility, bad footwork. He can’t run. Supposedly he’s a big power threat, but he hit 12 home runs at first base. This is not a kid! This is his third year in the big leagues! I don’t think he’s got the ability to get better.”

Maverik312
7 years ago

To Bell the Broken. Long may he reign.

John Autin
7 years ago

For a frame of reference, I made a pool of 200 live-ball hitters centered around Bell’s .176 ISO over his first 3 years. (Min. 1,000 PAs in first 3 years, ISO range from .158 to .193.)

So far in year 4, Bell has a .364 ISO, or +.188 net of his first 3 years.
In that pool of 200 hitters, just one had a year-4 ISO gain of even +.140.
Five in all netted at least +.100 in year 4, with at least 300 PAs:
— Jeff Bagwell, +.214 in 1994, age 26 (from .169 to .383).
— Boog Powell, +.135 in 1964, age 22 (from .181 to .316).
— Bryce Harper, +.126 in 2015, age 22 (from .193 to .319).
— Johnny Bench, +.125 in 1970, age 22 (from .169 to .294).
— Roger Maris, +.114 in 1960, age 25 (from .185 to .299).

So, obviously Bell’s not likely to sustain this massive ISO gain …
but if he keeps a lot of it, he’s quite liable to win the MVP. 🙂

lukeMember since 2024
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Perhaps if Yelich gets injured.

FrodoBeck
7 years ago
Reply to  luke

A certain Dodgers outfielder may have something to say about that

6er
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Josh would have to have the most phenomenal season to win an MVP just because he plays in the “Burgh”!

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  6er

He would have to have the most phenomenal season. That’s what the award is for.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

If he want to win it, he’ll have to pick up that defense. He’s already got 4 errors this year at 1B and even the award voters know that’s bad.

That said, I think he’s got an outside shot at the Hank Aaron award if he keeps it and some set of Bellinger, Yelich, and others fall off.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

“MVP” note was just referring to the 4 of those 5 precedents who won it.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago

His nickname has long been Tinkerbell. He finally found something that worked.

maximize_futilityMember since 2025
7 years ago

The best undercover fantasy pickup this side of Cody Bellinger and Dan Vogelbach

Darkstone42
7 years ago

I know this article is about his left-handed swing, but his right-handed two-dinger game was something to behold. His first home run in that game went 430 feet to the opposite side of center field on a pitch in the lower outside quadrant of the strike zone. That’s an incredible swing, and remarkable power, and just highlights what the exit-velocity heatmap illustrates: there’s literally nowhere to pitch the guy. He hits everything so hard, every part of the strike zone, and even outside of it.

szielinskiMember since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Darkstone42

I believed Bell had an Eddie Murray ceiling. We shall see!