Are Plate Discipline Breakouts for Real?

Earlier this month, I noted that hitters are chasing fewer pitches and seeking out fastballs in the zone. It’s one thing batters can do to fight back against the rising pitching talent and increased strikeouts. It seemed to me that every time I looked into a hitter potentially breaking out this season, I saw the same pattern: fewer swings on pitches outside the zone and a rising wRC+.

There comes a point when writing about the same thing over and over again becomes presumptuous if we can’t quite be sure that the benefits will last. To that end, I first went through plate discipline numbers from this season to determine if chasing fewer pitches seemed to help batters like I think it should. First, I looked at all hitters with at least 300 plate appearances in 2018 who were also qualified for the batting title as of May 13 of this year. While we can presume that taking pitches outside the strike zone is a skill, and one that stabilizes pretty quickly based on previous research, here’s how the numbers from last season and this one match up as of Tuesday’s data.

Even at the very early stages of this season, we see that O-Swing% is pretty consistent compared to last year. As to individual players, here are the biggest changers in a positive way over last season.

Biggest Improvements In Plate Discipline
Name O-Swing% (pfx) 2018 O-Swing% (pfx) 2019 O-Swing Change
Hunter Dozier 35.2 24 -11.2
Dansby Swanson 35.4 24.7 -10.7
Ryon Healy 35.9 25.9 -10
Orlando Arcia 38.7 30.2 -8.5
Freddie Freeman 34.2 26.2 -8
Niko Goodrum 33.5 25.9 -7.6
Dee Gordon 41.8 34.3 -7.5
Tommy Pham 22.6 15.5 -7.1
Kris Bryant 28.9 21.9 -7
Yonder Alonso 31.3 24.4 -6.9
Asdrubal Cabrera 31.8 25.1 -6.7
Joey Gallo 32.3 25.9 -6.4
Justin Smoak 25.4 19.3 -6.1
Cody Bellinger 30.7 24.8 -5.9
Kole Calhoun 29.5 23.7 -5.8
Mike Trout 19.4 13.6 -5.8
George Springer 23.6 17.9 -5.7
C.J. Cron 37.6 32.2 -5.4
Jason Heyward 32.8 27.6 -5.2
Albert Pujols 32.6 27.6 -5
Joc Pederson 33.3 28.3 -5
Avisail Garcia 42.8 38 -4.8
Michael Conforto 27.9 23.5 -4.4
Miguel Rojas 34 29.6 -4.4
Jose Altuve 34.2 29.9 -4.3
Paul DeJong 29.8 25.5 -4.3
Amed Rosario 41 36.8 -4.2

As for how these players have been helped, here are those same players along with their change in wRC+ over last season.

Biggest Improvements In Plate Discipline
Name O-Swing% (pfx) 2018 O-Swing% (pfx) 2019 O-Swing Change wRC+ 2018 wRC+ 2019 wRC+ Change
Hunter Dozier 35.2 24 -11.2 80 172 92
Dansby Swanson 35.4 24.7 -10.7 80 111 31
Ryon Healy 35.9 25.9 -10 90 104 14
Orlando Arcia 38.7 30.2 -8.5 54 85 31
Freddie Freeman 34.2 26.2 -8 137 147 10
Niko Goodrum 33.5 25.9 -7.6 103 85 -18
Dee Gordon 41.8 34.3 -7.5 77 104 27
Tommy Pham 22.6 15.5 -7.1 129 131 2
Kris Bryant 28.9 21.9 -7 125 148 23
Yonder Alonso 31.3 24.4 -6.9 97 68 -29
Asdrubal Cabrera 31.8 25.1 -6.7 111 101 -10
Joey Gallo 32.3 25.9 -6.4 110 156 46
Justin Smoak 25.4 19.3 -6.1 121 109 -12
Cody Bellinger 30.7 24.8 -5.9 120 227 107
Kole Calhoun 29.5 23.7 -5.8 79 117 38
Mike Trout 19.4 13.6 -5.8 191 176 -15
George Springer 23.6 17.9 -5.7 119 181 62
C.J. Cron 37.6 32.2 -5.4 122 109 -13
Jason Heyward 32.8 27.6 -5.2 99 115 16
Albert Pujols 32.6 27.6 -5 90 102 12
Joc Pederson 33.3 28.3 -5 126 141 15
Avisail Garcia 42.8 38 -4.8 92 124 32
Michael Conforto 27.9 23.5 -4.4 120 153 33
Miguel Rojas 34 29.6 -4.4 79 68 -11
Jose Altuve 34.2 29.9 -4.3 135 119 -16
Paul DeJong 29.8 25.5 -4.3 102 161 59
Amed Rosario 41 36.8 -4.2 85 100 15
AVERAGE 32.5 26 -6.5 106 126 20

For most of the players above, chasing fewer pitches is associated with better offensive outcomes. All other hitters lost about five points on average of wRC+ this season, although the players who had the biggest increase in chasing pitches outside the zone didn’t see a significantly different drop than the rest of the population who stayed pretty close to last year’s numbers. These numbers aren’t going to tell us much about whether the changes will remain going forward, nor will they tell us if the offensive gains are here to stay.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Looking back at last year might provide some help in determining whether this year’s players are likely to keep their hitting gains. I checked out all players with at least 300 plate appearances in 2017 and 100 plate appearances in April. Players looked very much last season like the hitters who most changed their O-Swing percentage from the previous season, improving their wRC+ in April by an average of 29 points over the previous year. Then I looked at how that group performed the rest of the year. The results are a mixed bag.

Plate Discipline Improvers from April 2018
2017 April 2018 ROS 2018
O-Swing% 33.0% 25.3% 30.5%
wRC+ 111 140 114

We see that the players who showed increased plate discipline in April of last season kept some of those improvements the rest of the year. There was a slightly higher correlation between the April O-Swing% and the ROS O-Swing% than 2017 O-Swing% and ROS O-Swing%. The gains made on swinging at pitches outside the zone were real. Unfortunately, the gains made on the wRC+ side didn’t really stick. As a group, the players simply reverted mostly back to 2017 performance the rest of the way.

Not ready to give up, I isolated the group into players who significantly improved O-Swing% in April and improved wRC+ in April. While most of the players who showed improved plate discipline got better results, that wasn’t true for all players. We are down to a group of 16 hitters, but this is how they turned out.

Plate Discipline and wRC+ Improvers from April 2018
2017 April 2018 ROS 2018
O-Swing% 33.0% 24.8% 30.7%
wRC+ 104 149 115

That looks better. Nine of the 16 players showed significant improvement over their 2017 numbers while only four got significantly worse. To provide a comparison, I took a similar group of players who improved their wRC+ in April 2018 over the previous season but who did not do better at O-Swing%. These were the results.

wRC+ Improvers from April 2018
2017 April 2018 ROS 2018
O-Swing% 31.8% 32.6% 32.8%
wRC+ 97 141 99

Well that’s kind of interesting. Nine of the 17 players got significantly worse while only four made big gains in wRC+. The median change from 2017 was an eight-point loss of wRC+ while the group of players who improved their wRC+ and their O-Swing% last April had a median gain of 12 points. I only studied one year of data, so some necessary waffling is included here, but the data does show some promise that the players who have improved their wRC+ and O-Swing% in the early part of the season have a decent chance of hitting better the rest of this summer than they did last year.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BobbyJohn69
7 years ago

Not a single player for the Rockies on the list. This is not surprising.

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago

I’m a little confused. Heyward has a 100 wRC+ this year after a 99 last year, so why is he listed as +16?

vslykeMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

His 2019 wRC+ is wrong in the table. Lots of guys have slightly off 2019 wRC+ (likely just because the data was pulled before today) but his is particularly far off the mark.

John Autin
7 years ago

Interesting stuff. Kinda need bigger samples, though.

Btw, the 3rd sentence in the last paragraph is a bit long and hard to follow, but maybe that’s just me. Might be clearer as bullet points, or at least with a comma before “while.”

John Autin
7 years ago

Typos in the last sentence: “chase” should be “chance” (Freudian?), and it should say they DECREASED (or improved) their O-swing%.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

[Those errors have been corrected.]

John Autin
7 years ago

Also … While this sample suggests a significant “stickiness” for wRC+ gains based on discipline, the size of those ROS gains seems a bit disappointing. Or to put it another way, about 75% of the early gains vanished in ROS.

Mahoney
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

First thing I thought of when I saw that was Didi Gregorius’s start last year. His plate discipline last April was downright Votto-esque, but then he went back to being the same “old” (2016-17 NYY version) Didi Gregorius.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
7 years ago

I did the same for Ks.

https://community.fangraphs.com/are-players-learning-to-cut-their-strikeout-rate/

For Ks I found basically a perfect one third split. One third loses all of the gains, one third keeps most of the gains and another third keeps 30-50% of the gains. It is a positive sign but no guarantee.as a group about 40% of the gains sticked, seems it is a little worse for patience.

jakesteens
7 years ago

The best part of this for me was Trout- his chase rate last year is lower than everyone’s improved chase rate except Pham Smoak and Springer and he’s now dropped it. His WRC+ is “down” to 176. He’s just unbelievably good and somehow still improving

MyDreamToPitch
7 years ago

Of course Mike Trout is on the list and of course his o-Swing was already crazy and of course he improved on it.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  MyDreamToPitch

Hate to be a spoilsport, but … Shouldn’t we expect young veterans to improve in O-swing % ?

Bryce Harper set a career low last year, as did Jose Ramirez and Mookie Betts. Kris Bryant is doing it this year. These are just off the top of my head.

We tend to gloss over the fact that certain skills MUST improve to offset the slow decline of hand-eye coordination, which tends to peak around age 24.

RPDCMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Trout’s improved by 22%, which is a bigger jump than even after his rookie season.

It’s also a bigger improvement than he made between his 2nd and 8th seasons.

mikejuntMember
7 years ago

This article needed more Cody Bellinger. Cutting K rate in half while hitting like Trout for almost 2 months is something else.

John Autin
7 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

On the other hand … Last year, Bellinger cut his K% almost 3 points and upped his contact% the same, but fared much worse than his rookie year. It’s not quite as simple as “more contact is always good.”

DDMember since 2020
7 years ago

Would be interesting to see how much of this is pitcher-assisted – meaning, if pitchers throw less in the zone to these guys historically because they are prone to chase, the hitter adjusts by being more patient in April, then pitchers adjust back ROS. This happened with Odubell Herrera in 2016. Would be interesting to see the zone% for these guys with the same splits to see if there is anything else to identify.

Mike Green
7 years ago

I wonder if you would get even sharper results with a more granular look at it, using Tango’s shadow and chase zones. Batters reasonably should swing at many pitches in the shadow zone with 2 strikes and less than 3 balls. A swing at any other pitch in the shadow and all pitches in the chase is a Bad Swing Decision. Significant BSD rate changes would, I’d hypothesize, be a good indicator, and maybe better than simple OSwing.