Let’s Judge Midseason Trades Now

Denny Medley and Michael McLoone-Imagn Images

“Don’t grade trades on deadline day,” said the wise man. It takes months to find out if Jhoan Duran will put the Phillies over the top, years to learn how Carlos Correa’s second stint in Houston will go, and perhaps as much as a decade to learn exactly how much the Padres might eventually regret trading Leo De Vries.

At least, so says the wise man. “Hogwash,” says I. Let’s grade the midseason trades now.

According to RosterResource, 391 players have been traded since the end of last year’s World Series. Or at least, there have been 391 discrete player trade movements; a few of these guys have moved more than once. I’m only interested in midseason trades, which I’m defining as trades that took place after the general MLB Opening Day, March 27. Apologies to South Jersey legend Tyler Phillips, who’s been weirdly good (and weirdly aggro) since joining the Marlins; you were traded two days too early.

That leaves us with 264 player movements by trade since the day after Opening Day. I pared that list down to only include players who appeared in at least one game with the team that traded for them. So, goodbye long-term prospects like De Vries and Eduardo Tait. Goodbye injured vets like Jordan Montgomery. Goodbye maturing prospects or fringe major leaguers like Blade Tidwell, who appeared in the majors before they got traded, but not after.

That’s a subset of 147 player movements, involving 62 position players and 82 pitchers. (Scott Blewett, Michael Petersen, and Rafael Montero got traded twice and made major league contributions to multiple new teams this year.)

By having the most liberal possible definition of the word “midseason,” I’ve avoided having to make a judgment call on when the trade deadline actually starts. Though that does cause other problems, as you’ll see on this list of the most productive post-trade players.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
The Most Valuable Midseason Trade-ees
Date Team Name Position WAR WPA
6/13/2025 MIL Andrew Vaughn 1B 1.9 1.02
4/7/2025 MIL Quinn Priester SP 1.7 1.60
4/26/2025 MIN Kody Clemens UTIL 1.6 0.71
7/25/2025 SEA Josh Naylor 1B 1.5 0.80
7/31/2025 PHI Harrison Bader OF 1.5 0.64
7/31/2025 HOU Carlos Correa INF 1.4 0.29
7/6/2025 BAL Alex Jackson C 1.1 -0.07
7/31/2025 NYY José Caballero UTIL 1.1 0.77
5/27/2025 ATH Sean Newcomb RP 1.0 1.89
7/31/2025 KCR Stephen Kolek SP 1.0 0.86

The Brewers top this list twice not just because Vaughn and Priester have been good, but because they got their business done super early. (A cynic might argue that because the Vaughn and Priester trades were so successful, we should cut the Brewers some slack for their somnambulant deadline season.) That’s why the most valuable player involved in a Phillies-Twins trade this year was not Duran, nor the white-hot Bader, but Kody Clemens.

The Phillies, inundated with left-handed platoon bats and with guys who can theoretically play second base but really ought to be in left field, had no use for Clemens, who was unlucky enough to fit both categories. They sent him to Minnesota for cash in late April, and since then Clemens has been solid enough, playing six defensive positions and posting a 101 wRC+. But his placement here is an artifact of his having played 107 games since the trade, 21 more than any other eligible player.

Good for Clemens, who’s now an everyday player for the first time in his major league career at age 29, but he’s not the kind of player we’re talking about. Let’s limit the sample to players who got traded during the month of July.

Top Post-Deadline-Trade WAR
Team Name POS WAR WPA
SEA Josh Naylor 1B 1.5 0.80
PHI Harrison Bader OF 1.5 0.64
HOU Carlos Correa INF 1.4 0.29
BAL Alex Jackson C 1.1 -0.07
NYY José Caballero UTIL 1.1 0.77
KCR Stephen Kolek SP 1.0 0.86
SDP Mason Miller RP 0.8 1.18
PHI Jhoan Duran RP 0.8 0.22
KCR Mike Yastrzemski OF 0.8 -0.51
TEX Merrill Kelly SP 0.8 0.1

That’s more like it. This list includes some of the biggest names who moved at or near the deadline. Even the Royals’ pickups came from the Freddy Fermin challenge trade and a win-now move for Yastrzemski. Now, if you’re trading the second-best Dominican pitcher named Yunior Marte for a 34-year-old Yastrzemski, I don’t know if you’re trying especially hard to win now, but it’s still a deadline addition for a team that had playoff aspirations at the time.

Jackson is the only player here who wasn’t added to assist a playoff push. The by-then-obviously-doomed Orioles picked Jackson up from the Yankees because if you don’t put someone behind home plate the ball is going to go to the backstop on every pitch. Still, he’s been quite good since arriving in Baltimore.

On this short a timeline, WAR might not be the best metric for judging trades. Deadline acquisitions don’t just compile stats, they’re intended to drive in a run or get an out at a key moment. So who’s done the best job by win probability?

Top Post-Deadline-Trade WPA
Team Name Position WAR WPA
DET Kyle Finnegan RP 0.5 1.51
NYY David Bednar RP 0.7 1.28
SDP Mason Miller RP 0.8 1.18
BAL Dietrich Enns RP 0.2 1.13
CHC Andrew Kittredge RP 0.5 0.90
KCR Stephen Kolek SP 1.0 0.86
SEA Josh Naylor 1B 1.5 0.80
CIN Miguel Andujar DH 0.6 0.77
NYY José Caballero UTIL 1.1 0.77
TOR Seranthony Domínguez RP 0.3 0.66

It’s probably appropriate that this list is dominated by relief pitchers, who moved in huge numbers, and in a few cases, for huge returns. Plus Miguel Andujar, who I keep forgetting is still in the league. But in just 29 games with the Reds, he’s been not only productive but apparently also clutch: He has 30 hits in a Reds uniform, and five of those have either tied the game or given Cincinnati the lead.

In the process of compiling this information, it became clear to me that — the heroics of Andujar notwithstanding — one individual trade isn’t going to swing a pennant race. No season-tilting superstar changed employers at the deadline; the biggest names to move were either closers or stars of the late 2010s, like Correa and Shane Bieber.

Of the 144 players who were traded this season and went on to make a contribution to their new teams, only 15 — or about one in 10 — has improved his team’s chances by as much as a win, either by WAR or WPA. Nobody’s broken the two-win threshold.

But several teams have acquired packages of reinforcements who have made a big difference as a group: The Mariners with Naylor and Eugenio Suárez; the Phillies with Duran and Bader; the Brewers with Priester and Vaughn. So let’s end by looking at each team’s trade performance in the aggregate.

How Each Team Is Making Out in Midseason Trades
Team New Players WAR WPA Key Addition(s)
ARI 3 -1.3 -1.89 Tyler Locklear, Andrew Hoffman
ATH 3 1.2 1.68 Sean Newcomb
ATL 8 -0.8 -1.43 Erick Fedde, Rafael Montero
BAL 4 0.9 0.00 Alex Jackson, Dietrich Enns
BOS 6 -0.4 -1.15 Dustin May, Jordan Hicks, Kyle Harrison
CHC 6 0.4 -0.11 Andrew Kittredge, Drew Pomeranz
CHW 5 0.1 -1.35 Aaron Civale
CIN 4 1.0 -0.56 Miguel Andujar, Ke’Bryan Hayes, Zack Littell
CLE 2 0.8 -0.16 Matt Festa
COL 1 -0.4 -0.77 Alan Trejo
DET 7 0.3 -0.12 Kyle Finnegan, Charlie Morton
HOU 4 1.5 -1.08 Carlos Correa, Jesús Sánchez
KCR 6 2.6 -0.43 Stephen Kolek, Mike Yastrzemski, Adam Frazier
LAA 5 -0.1 -0.91 LaMonte Wade Jr., Andrew Chafin
LAD 9 0.3 -1.71 Brock Stewart, Alex Call
MIA 2 -0.3 -0.54 Michael Petersen, Ryan Gusto
MIL 8 3.6 1.46 Andrew Vaughn, Quinn Priester
MIN 7 0.7 -3.51 Kody Clemens, Taj Bradley
NYM 6 0.9 -3.77 Tyler Rogers, Ryan Helsley, Cedric Mullins
NYY 7 1.9 -0.48 José Caballero, David Bednar
PHI 5 2.1 0.74 Jhoan Duran, Harrison Bader
PIT 5 -0.5 -1.98 Cam Devanney, Alexander Canario
SDP 8 2.5 -0.36 Mason Miller, Ramón Laureano, Ryan O’Hearn
SEA 3 2.3 0.46 Eugenio Suárez, Josh Naylor
SFG 3 1.0 -0.38 Rafael Devers, Drew Gilbert
TBR 11 0.7 -0.67 Griffin Jax, Adrian Houser
TEX 3 1.0 0.13 Merrill Kelly, Phil Maton
TOR 5 1.1 0.40 Shane Bieber, Seranthony Domínguez
WSN 1 0.4 0.18 Clayton Beeter

The Cardinals are the only team that hasn’t added a major league player via trade this season. The Rockies, ever content to stand pat, came close. In April, they purchased Alan Trejo from the Rangers; Trejo had only left the Rockies organization in the first place 10 months prior. Trejo spent three weeks in the organization, during which time he appeared in 13 games, batted .175 with one walk and two doubles, and generate -0.4 WAR. The Rockies released him on May 18, and nine days after that he re-signed with the Rangers.

Technically, that counts as acquiring a big leaguer in a trade. Practically, not so much.

In this table, we see yet more evidence of the Rays, Dodgers, and Padres being inveterate fidgeters, along with confirmation that the Mariners’ deadline moves were worth the cost.

But I was mildly surprised to learn that the Royals were massive winners in this year’s midseason trade market. Kolek has generated a full win in just four starts, which I can’t get my head around given his modest strikeout rate. The third guy in the Fermin trade, Ryan Bergert, has also been decent in his eight starts. Yastrzemski has hit well, and even Adam Frazier, whose acquisition I mocked two months ago, is hitting .281 since his return to Kansas City.

Was that enough to put the Royals back in the playoff hunt? No, and it wasn’t especially close, even in the depressingly winnable AL Central. But J.J. Picollo had one of the best hit rates of any GM this deadline, so bully for him.

I’m sure that in time we’ll look back on the 2025 deadline and pick winners and losers based on how various prospects developed, or how various newcomers impacted this year’s postseason. But that’s the future’s problem. In the meantime, congratulations to the Brewers and Royals.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

65 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
scotth855Member since 2020
11 months ago

Drew Pomeranz was not a trade deadline addition for the Cubs. He’s been on the team since April.

TJ_KrafnickMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  scotth855

Mid-season trades, not deadline.

Left of Centerfield
11 months ago
Reply to  TJ_Krafnick

He was acquired on April 21st. That’s hardly mid-season. He was also acquired via a purchase, not a trade. Matt Festa is another one. Purchased by the Guardians on April 30th.

SertoriusMember since 2023
11 months ago

The author spent about four paragraphs explaining what he meant by midseason (and the pros and cons of said approach).

kingharbaughMember since 2021
11 months ago

Helps to read the article, probably.

Left of Centerfield
11 months ago
Reply to  kingharbaugh

I did.

But the definition makes no sense. If you’re going to include every acquisition (trade or non-trade) since the beginning of the season, then say that. Instead of (for example) titling the article “Let’s Judge Midseason Trades Now”. There’s simply no universe in which that title fits the analysis that was done.

BTW, just because someone spent 4 paragraphs explaining their decision, doesn’t mean it was a good decision.

Last edited 11 months ago by Left of Centerfield
PressXToJason
11 months ago

Mid-season: during the season.

Maybe you could consider, in the future, knowing what your objection actually is, so you don’t first pretend like it wasn’t explained, and then, upon being informed that it was explained, saying the explanation was wrong, when it met the dictionary definition of the terms used. And then trying a fleeting little “but even if I WAS wrong, you’re also bad and wrong” jab, because even you know you’re wrong.

Runaway ToasterMember since 2016🏆 MVP
11 months ago
Reply to  PressXToJason

Approach matters. Try something like:

“Pomeranz was acquired a bit early relative to others, so I think he throws off an analysis based on post-trade accumulated stats like WAR and WPA. Maybe some adjustment factor is needed? Or just be aware of that when interpreting the results”

I would better dollars to donuts that would be received better and bring amount the discussion you’re aiming for.

Brad JohnsonMember
11 months ago

Some might say using four paragraphs to explain a simple definition is indicative of at least a compositional blunder if not a poor strategic decision.

Some are also horribly tedious. I had fun.

carterMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  scotth855

Not related to this article, but I remember a few years ago Pomeranz has a 0.00 ERA going into the last day of the season, alas he ended with higher

PC1970Member since 2024
11 months ago

The Tigers pu-pu platter of pickups looked bad at the time & look even worse now.

Finnegan was really good until getting hurt & has been bad in 2 games once coming back.

Rafael Montero has been mid & is also struggling lately.

Codi Heuer was a nothing burger, only pitched 3 1/3 with a 10.34 FIP.

Paul Sewald has barely pitched.(He was out til September when traded to them)

Charlie Morton was so bad he got released.

Chris Paddack was so bad he got banished to the bullpen on a team that only had 3 good starters plus Charlie Morton as SP 4.

Not sure who #7 even is?? Brewer Hicklen? Randy Dobnak? Either one didn’t do much, Dobnak didn’t even pitch for Detroit.

Last edited 11 months ago by PC1970
Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
11 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

I think it’s Hicklen — acquired on 3/28.

EDIT: though he managed 0.2 WAR in his one game by going 2 for 3 with a BB.

Last edited 11 months ago by Fun-Hating Dork
bada87bingMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

Certainly was not a good trade deadline. But, evaluating the WPA added from the last table, it has not been as bad as it *feels*. And that is entirely due to Finnegan.

MorlandMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

Dobnak was just a salary dump by the Twins. I doubt the Tigers ever expected him to pitch for them. All it meant was that they paid a lesser prospect to acquire Paddack.

crackbaldoMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

Detroit really needed to bolster the staring rotation and had the prospects to do so. They lined up really well with Pittsburgh to make a splash. Alas, neither team did anything to help their current or future selves.

NathanMember since 2018
11 months ago

Which midseason acquisition for the yankees was so bad that they removed the 2 WPA from Bednar and Caballero?

ClaydvMember since 2018
11 months ago
Reply to  Nathan

Probably the other relievers who got shelled the day after the deadline.

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
11 months ago
Reply to  Nathan

Jake Bird and Camilio Doval. Bird, in only 2 appearances, managed a -0.44 WPA; Doval’s at -1.31 through 29 appearances.

It’s a good thing Bednar has been as advertised, because, otherwise, woof.

Ryan McMahon is also underwater, but given that WPA doesn’t really measure defense, that’s kinda expected.

pdunes
11 months ago

Counter point – CC Sabathia and his 11 wins after being traded.

Counter counter point – Brewers finished second in the division

MorlandMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  pdunes

Another counter point – Doyle Alexander going 9-0 after being traded from the Braves to the Tigers in 1987. The Tigers won the division by a game but lost the pennant. Of course, the guy they traded for him, some kid named Smoltz, had an OK career.

nategreat
11 months ago
Reply to  Morland

Only a third starter in his own teams rotation

LouisMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  nategreat

Good point. Raises a question: how many third starters in the HOF?

Jeff in JerseyMember since 2020
11 months ago

I knew without looking that the Mets would have the largest negative WPA.
Oh, when the process looks wise and the results are bad, complaining feels different–but man does this suck.

David Klein
11 months ago
Reply to  Jeff in Jersey

If you told me the Mets acquired players wpa uld was twice as bad as it is I’d believe you the horror is real. If they were just mediocre the Mets would have clinched already.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
11 months ago
Reply to  David Klein

If you told me Ryan Helsley’s WPA for the Mets was negative one million, I’d believe you.

LouisMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  Jeff in Jersey

Actually, you can blame this not on the Mets’ front office, but on Fangraphs! On August 1, Fangraphs had the Mets at 93.1% to make the playoffs. The Mets accordingly didn’t think they needed to do much to improve the team, and they didn’t. It was all going fine for a while, on September 1, Fangraphs had them at 94.5% to make the playoffs. If they don’t make it today (and Fangraphs has them as a 2-1 dog to do so), that 20-1 shot will pass the finish line first. Amazin.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
11 months ago
Reply to  Louis

Fangraphs has them as a 2-1 dog

It obviously doesn’t matter now but I want to point out that this meant the Fangraphs odds were heavily favoring the Mets against the Reds, since the coin-flip odds would’ve been 3-1 against them.

maguroMember since 2016
11 months ago

Fangraphs believed in the Mets to the very end.

SteveMcAnderson
11 months ago

WAR in the final table is WAR of additions? Or is it WAR of Addition – WAR of Subtractions where subtractions is defined as MLB value of players traded away? How about WPA?

I wonder if a better, albeit more complicated and harder, measure of the WAR added would involve WAAR of additions – (at the time of trade) projWAR of the player said additions are replacing.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
11 months ago

Addition only, I’m pretty sure.

markymarc767Member since 2020
11 months ago

I’m fascinated that there are so many instances in the final table of teams cumulatively getting positive WAR but negative WPA from their additions. Is this because so many of these additions are relievers who are presumably then thrust into high-leverage situations?

SteveMcAnderson
11 months ago
Reply to  markymarc767

Isn’t a lot of it that WAR is based on replacement level and WPA would be relative to average?

I double checked this just to make sure and the Median team WAR is like 32 (18 from hitters, 14 from pitchers) and the Median Team WPA is 0 (-3 from hitters & +3 from pitchers).

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  markymarc767

WPA is Winning Percent above Average.

WAR is Wins Above Replacement.

I was going to make this same complaint, but checked the comments first.
WPA is a poor metric to use because many acquired players might be below average AND still helpful.
A player could be an improvement and still below average.
The cumulative aspect makes this discrepancy even more severe: the longer a below average player is on a team the more negative WPA the player will acquire, even though he may also be notably better than replacement value and thus an improvement.

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
11 months ago

Also WPA does not include defense. A major flaw.

And of course is highly situational, but I think that’s a plus in this specific exercise

archibaldyeats
11 months ago

Why would a team in the playoff picture want to trade for a below average, or below replacement level player ? Ostensibly they would have someone on the farm to do that for free.

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  archibaldyeats

No one would trade for at/below replacement value.
Average is significantly better than replacement value.
A player can be valuable, notably better than replacement, and still below average.

Yer Main GuyMember since 2024
11 months ago

It’s a story statistic. Is a direct attribution of how games are won and lost. Far from perfect, but for the article it’s trying to explain how much a player increased team wins versus average.

raregokusMember since 2022
11 months ago

WPA is win probability added, it has nothing to do with win percentage

Ostensibly RidiculousMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

ahhh, yes lol

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
11 months ago

A Guardians – Diamondbacks World Series would demonstrate that selling major league players for no short term value is the key to success

deerhavenMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

As a Scottsdale resident since 2001 from NE OH who only switched my allegiance from the Tribe (as they were then) in 2006, I have already made plans with my siblings and progeny to attend a game.

deerhavenMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  deerhaven

Quote in a group text from youngest brother 9/11. “We bought our first round playoff bundle yesterday. How’s that for cockeyed optimism?”

Middle brother “Impressive.”

Last edited 11 months ago by deerhaven
MikeSMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

You joke, but major sports GMs have shown time and again that their organizational philosophy is “do what the last champ did.”

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
11 months ago

If the Reds or the D’Backs shade the Mets for the last wild card spot they should send David Stearns a thank you note and give Ryan Helsley a playoff share.

opifijiklMember since 2024
11 months ago

At least the Red Sox were trying with their trades…

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
11 months ago
Reply to  opifijikl

Not the Devers one

MikeSMember since 2020
11 months ago

Yunior Marte is nowhere near as good as his older, Catalonian cousin, Thenior Marte.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
11 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

I can’t stop laughing in spite of myself

deerhavenMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

That would be Castilian, not Catalonian.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
11 months ago
Reply to  deerhaven

It would also be if you spelled it with a C or a Z instead of an S, but why let a different Romance language and an additional typo get in the way of the yolk

Last edited 11 months ago by Roger McDowell Hot Foot
MikeSMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  deerhaven

I realized that after the edit window had passed, so I am going to maintain that “Catalonian” is simply a more funny word than “Castillian” and claim that I did it on purpose.

Also, it’s kind of spain wide since the major town in Andalusia is pronounced “the-vie-ya” by the locals.

Last edited 11 months ago by MikeS
FedericoMember since 2017
11 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

Catalans would hate you for doing this and ban you from ever visiting BarcelonLocal-locals from Sevilla would call it “Sevilla” as one of the characterizing elements in their accent is the clear “S” sound (“seseo”) vs. the “th” sound from other accents within Spain (“ceceo”) 🙂 (standard Spanish would also be “S” as per the ‘distinción’)

Last edited 11 months ago by Federico
Jason BMember since 2017
11 months ago
Reply to  Federico

This guy Spanishes

raregokusMember since 2022
11 months ago
Reply to  MikeS

Giving you solo applause from my living room right now, that was truly inspired

StatmanjackMember since 2023
11 months ago

A bit funny not to even mention how mediocre Rafael Devers has been

JuuuustAnotherBaseballFanMember since 2018
11 months ago
Reply to  Statmanjack

What is “mediocre” to you? Is it the solely the batting average or is it the 17 HR as well since the trade? He is currently at 97/34/107/.252 for the season… that certainly isn’t mediocre.

Last edited 11 months ago by JuuuustAnotherBaseballFan
jtsnowdayMember since 2022
11 months ago
Reply to  Statmanjack

I think he’s actually missing from the first table? Fangraphs has him at 1.3 WAR with SF.

thaaldermanMember since 2024
11 months ago

I think we need to account for the possibility that Andrew Vaughn is a bioweapon sent to Milwaukee by Chris Getz to destroy the Cubs’ hopes of winning the NL Central.

tjralstin13Member since 2024
11 months ago

For the Rangers, i think it’s worth it to factor in Danny Coulombe into the WAR calculation. He was so good prior to deadline and then awful for us. Got put into the doghouse very quickly and rarely used.

OzTotsMember since 2022
11 months ago

Did you forget to include my boyfriend Willie Castro w the Cubs?? 😢😢

nathanjMember since 2024
11 months ago

I was surprised that Priester’s has a relatively low fWAR given 152 IP and 3.25 ERA. Had to remind myself, fWAR uses FIP. Isn’t xFIP better? Seems to penalizes ground ball pitchers.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
11 months ago
Reply to  nathanj

I’m not sure xFIP would penalize ground-ball pitchers; it normalized HR/FB, so ground-ball pitchers wouldn’t get charged with as many imputed HRs since they don’t give up as many FBs.

Of the ten pitchers with the highest GB% (>100 IP so as to catch Priester), four have an FIP higher than their xFIP and six lower.

Brad JohnsonMember
11 months ago

Once we have postseason results, THEN we can use ChampWPA.

LouisMember since 2024
11 months ago

The one thing this proves is that this methodology is probably not a good way to evaluate trades. So what if KC added 2.6 WAR? They didn’t make the playoffs. The only value of that 2.6 WAR is to put it on some KC front office resumes. (Actually,the Royals probably did OK in these deals as Kolek and Berget may be promising, controllable arms. Of course, this year’s WAR doesn’t tell us that, nor what their WAR will be next season.) And what to make of the fact that the Dodgers are at 0.3 WAR, -1.71 WPA (and won the division) and the Giants are at 1.0 WAR, -0.38 WPA, (and have tee times next week)? Of course, the Giants have seven more seasons to get a return on Devers. And seven years plus deferrals to pay him another $250 million or so. The point being, if you’re going to judge mid-season trades based solely on performance over the remainder of the season, the only thing that matters is whether the trades help you mkae the playoffs. If you don’t make the playoffs that added WAR is as valuable to you as the 68 WR Ernie Banks delivered to th Cubs all those years. There was obviously a lot of wrok and thought that went into this, but I think the conclusion is that it is not worth the effort of doing it again. (And I might add that if one were to do it again, it probably makes sense to analyze net WAR. Sure Cody Clemens and the others added 0.7 WAR to the Twins, but how much value did the Twins lose with the players they traded away? That probably explains why a 0.7 WAR translates to a -3.51 WPA, so while WPA may be a better measure, using net WAR would likely reflect a better correlation with WPA and be a somewhat more accurate measurement.)

Jason BMember since 2017
11 months ago
Reply to  Louis

I can see this wall of text from outer space