With No Baseball For Awhile, Justin Verlander Undergoes Groin Surgery

In the first instance of what could be a wave of players electing to undergo surgeries while MLB remains on an indefinite hiatus and before hospitals begin canceling elective surgeries to focus their resources on COVID-19 patients, Justin Verlander had surgery on his right groin on Tuesday. Per the Astros, the recovery timeline is six weeks, and since there isn’t likely to be any baseball in that time after the Centers for Disease Control recommended limiting gatherings of 50 or more people for the next eight weeks, it made sense for the 37-year-old righty to go under the knife now.

It’s been a rocky spring Verlander, who’s coming off a season for which he nabbed that long-elusive second Cy Young after going 21-6 with a 2.58 ERA, 3.27 FIP, 300 strikeouts — reaching that plateau in the same game in which he notched his 3,000th career strikeout — and 6.4 WAR. Recall that he was scratched from his February 27 start due to discomfort in his right groin, though the Astros felt the danger was minimal enough that they allowed him to throw a simulated game that same day. He was roughed up in his Grapefruit League debut on March 3 against the Cardinals, then left his March 8 start against the Mets after two innings, complaining of soreness in his right triceps. Read the rest of this entry »


What Might 2019 Have Looked Like With a Shortened Season?

MLB appears to be inevitably headed to a shortened schedule, and at this date, we don’t really have a great idea what that might look like. Fewer games is likely to mean a little more randomness. The 162-game schedule is long by design. With the talent levels of major league teams clustered fairly close together even at the extremes, playing 162 games exacerbates the differences that do exist. In a three-game series where one team has a 65% chance of winning each game, the underdog still wins more games a quarter of the time. If the same teams played a 45-game series, the odds of the underdog winning drop below 2%. That’s an example at the extremes. If a team was favored to win every game 55% of the time, they would still be considered much more talented in baseball terms, yet over 81 games, half a season’s worth, the underdog still wins nearly one in five series.

Dan Szymborski wrote earlier today about how the ZiPS 2020 playoff odds change based on different season lengths. I’m going to take a different approach. To provide some sense of how a different schedule can change outcomes, we can look how things unfolded last season. Here’s what the season would look like if it had ended on September 8, 2019, after roughly 144 games:

What If 2019 Ended on September 8
AL East W L W% GB
Yankees 94 50 .653 0
Rays 86 59 .593 8.5
Red Sox 76 67 .531 17.5
Orioles 46 97 .322 47.5
Blue Jays 55 89 .382 39
AL Central W L W% GB
Twins 88 55 .615 0
Indians 83 61 .576 5.5
White Sox 63 80 .441 25
Tigers 42 100 .296 45.5
Royals 53 91 .368 35.5
AL West W L W% GB
Astros 94 50 .653 0
Athletics 84 59 .587 9.5
Angels 67 77 .465 27
Mariners 58 86 .403 36
Rangers 72 73 .497 22.5
NL East W L W% GB
Braves 89 55 .618 0
Nationals 79 63 .556 9
Mets 72 70 .507 16
Phillies 74 68 .521 14
Marlins 51 91 .359 37
NL Central W L W% GB
Cardinals 81 62 .566 0
Cubs 76 66 .535 4.5
Brewers 74 68 .521 6.5
Reds 67 77 .465 14.5
Pirates 62 81 .434 19
NL West W L W% GB
Dodgers 93 52 .641 0
Diamondbacks 75 68 .524 17
Rockies 60 84 .417 32.5
Padres 66 76 .465 25.5
Giants 69 74 .483 23
Blue = In playoffs at actual season’s end, but not if season ended on 9/8/2019.
Orange = Not in playoffs at actual season’s end, but would be if season ended 9/8/2019.

Read the rest of this entry »


Meg Rowley FanGraphs Chat – 3/17/2020

2:00
Meg Rowley: Hi everyone – going to give the queue a bit more time to fill up. Will get started in a few minutes!

2:05
JR: Given the Marlins much improved farm system, how many seasons (assuming this one happens) do you think before Miami is a viable postseason contender? Or at least playing meaningful games after June?

2:06
Meg Rowley: Heck, they might be playing meaningful games this June (please let’s be playing baseball in June!) – a shortened season can make things pretttty weird. But realistically, I’d say two more. And a lot depends on them being willing to spend money, which…

2:06
Josh: I know there are more important issues than baseball, but how do you think shortened seasons will look similar to the strike-shortened seasons of the past?

2:07
Meg Rowley: I think we might end up with some real funky playoff teams if things keep dwindling, though that likely manifests more as surprising Wild Card teams, or a few of the more coin flippy divisions going to the opposite side of the coin than we expected.

2:08
Meg Rowley: The Yankees are still good. The Brave are still good. And the longer they’re on break, the more dudes they get back.

Read the rest of this entry »


COVID-19 Roundup: Shortened Seasons

This is the second installment of a daily series in which the FanGraphs staff rounds up the latest developments regarding the COVID-19 virus’ effect on baseball.

Given the speed with which national guidelines on COVID-19 are changing, you could be forgiven for not keeping up with its implications for baseball. Since last Friday, the CDC has recommended avoiding gatherings of 50 or more people for the next eight weeks and the White House asked the country to avoid groups of 10 or more, keep kids home where possible, and avoid eating and drinking in public for the next 15 days.

Meanwhile, major metropolitan areas are settling in for the long haul. The Bay Area announced a Shelter In Place policy on Monday, and New York closed restaurants, bars, and schools until at least April 20; Washington state has announced similar closures of gathering places, with schools set to remain closed until at least April 24. The state of Ohio did the same on Sunday, and Oregon has already followed suit.

So what’s a roundup of baseball news items against that backdrop? It’s insignificant, really. But here we are, on a baseball website, and COVID-19 continues to affect the game. Here are the baseball-related coronavirus stories from the past day. Read the rest of this entry »


COVID-19 Adds Obstacles for Minor Leaguers

Last Wednesday night, the day before MLB shuttered spring training and delayed the start to its season, I was texting with a baseball operations employee in a National League front office. We discussed the likelihood of cancellations, the chaos that would inevitably follow, and the repercussions for players and teams. At one point in the conversation he speculated, “minor leaguers will be absolutely shafted.”

It appears that he was right. With one notable exception, minor leaguers, already unpaid during spring training and the offseason, will not collect paychecks for any games missed due to the spread of COVID-19. So far only one team, the Tampa Bay Rays, has announced plans to pay their minor league players during the delay. While not covering anyone’s salary directly, the club plans to give everyone $800 to help with expenses while they’re unable to play ball. It’s a step in the right direction, even if $800 is considerably less than the monthly salaries these players were set to earn before the disruption.

Still, it’s money that players elsewhere around the league would love to have. Most minor leaguers were just weeks away from solidifying their in-season accommodations, and now find themselves without a place to go or a buck to pay for it once they arrive. The situation has caused affected players considerable distress.

“It sucks,” says one pitcher in a National League farm system who, like other players interviewed for this piece, preferred to remain anonymous. “I’m fortunate enough that I can come home and live with my parents and not pay any rent. But I have a lot of teammates who either have a kid or are married and don’t have the opportunity to go home and have their parents pay for everything.” Read the rest of this entry »


Michael Chavis Talks Hitting

Michael Chavis enjoyed a solid rookie season with the Red Sox in 2019. Primarily playing first and second base, the 24-year-old former first round pick slugged 18 home runs while putting up a .766 OPS and a 96 wRC+ over 382 plate appearances. Power was his calling card. Per Statcast, Chavis’ taters traveled an average of 419 feet, and his longest was jettisoned a prodigious 459 feet.

He rode a bit of rollercoaster on his way to Boston. Drafted 26th overall in 2014 out of Marietta, Georgia’s Sprayberry High School, Chavis scuffled in his initial professional seasons. Struggling to find his swing, he put up high strikeout rates, and tepid offensive numbers, casting doubt on his future. Then he began to find himself. Buoyed by a 2017 reunion with his old hitting coach, Chavis regained his stroke, turned a corner, and within a few years was once again propelling baseballs far distances.

Chavis discussed his power-packed swing — including how it was lost, and then rediscovered — at the tail end of last season.

——

David Laurila: Is hitting simple, or is it complicated?

Michael Chavis: “It depends on the day you’re asking me. When things are going good, it’s as simple as could be — it’s easy — but when things aren’t going well, you start trying to find an answer. You start searching for a difference in your swing. Even though you know you should keep things simple, it’s not like you can be, ‘Oh, I just don’t care; it’ll figure itself out.’ It’s kind of… I guess the weird thing about hitting is you’re constantly making adjustments and changes in order to stay consistent.”

Laurila: You’re changing in order to stay the same…

Chavis: “Yes, which obviously doesn’t make sense. But that’s what it is. One day you can think — this is a random example — ‘swing down,’ because maybe you’ve been getting long and loopy. So you think about swinging down, and your body — just how the body works — is going to make an adjustment. But at some point your body is going to make that adjustment without you being aware of it. All of a sudden, thinking ‘swinging down’ is going to become physically swinging down. Then you have to make an another adjustment.”

Laurila: Basically, one of your mental cues needs to be adjusted. Read the rest of this entry »


How Much Do the Playoff Odds Change in a Shorter Season?

Will there be a 2020 baseball season? How many games will teams play? What will that mean for the 2020 baseball season? Normally, these would be extremely upsetting questions to contemplate; in the world in which we’re currently living, they’re somewhere around the 75,000th most important quandaries facing us. But as someone qualified to serve as a baseball writer rather than an epidemiologist, they’re also the kinds of questions I can actually seek to answer, and the differences between how baseball will eventually look versus what we’re used to are bigger than you might think. Assuming we have a season, that is; if no games are played, the projections will be 100% accurate.

So how much do the playoff races change in a shorter season? To answer this, I spent the weekend reconfiguring ZiPS so that it wouldn’t assume a 162-game season — an eventuality I had hoped not to have to deal with unless or until there was a strike — allowing me to run playoff probabilities for seasons of any length. Let’s start with the baseline projections, how ZiPS saw the races before the world turned upside down:

ZiPS Projections Pre-COVID-19 Delay
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
New York Yankees 96 66 .593 61.3% 29.2% 90.5% 12.7%
Tampa Bay Rays 92 70 4 .568 32.6% 44.6% 77.2% 7.8%
Boston Red Sox 85 77 11 .525 6.0% 25.9% 31.9% 2.0%
Toronto Blue Jays 73 89 23 .451 0.0% 0.8% 0.9% 0.0%
Baltimore Orioles 57 105 39 .352 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
Minnesota Twins 91 71 .562 60.9% 14.5% 75.4% 8.5%
Cleveland Indians 88 74 3 .543 30.3% 20.9% 51.2% 4.4%
Chicago White Sox 82 80 9 .506 8.7% 10.0% 18.7% 1.3%
Kansas City Royals 71 91 20 .438 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0%
Detroit Tigers 63 99 28 .389 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
Houston Astros 93 69 .574 69.2% 15.0% 84.1% 10.7%
Oakland A’s 88 74 5 .543 25.2% 27.3% 52.5% 4.4%
Los Angeles Angels 82 80 11 .506 5.3% 10.3% 15.6% 1.0%
Texas Rangers 74 88 19 .457 0.4% 1.2% 1.6% 0.1%
Seattle Mariners 62 100 31 .383 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
Washington Nationals 91 71 .562 42.1% 29.5% 71.7% 6.5%
Atlanta Braves 90 72 1 .556 34.8% 31.5% 66.3% 5.5%
New York Mets 87 75 4 .537 18.2% 28.1% 46.3% 3.2%
Philadelphia Phillies 82 80 9 .506 4.8% 13.4% 18.2% 1.0%
Miami Marlins 69 93 22 .426 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
Chicago Cubs 85 77 .525 38.1% 8.5% 46.6% 3.4%
Milwaukee Brewers 83 79 2 .512 23.5% 7.5% 31.0% 2.1%
St. Louis Cardinals 82 80 3 .506 20.9% 7.2% 28.1% 1.8%
Cincinnati Reds 82 80 3 .506 16.9% 6.2% 23.1% 1.5%
Pittsburgh Pirates 71 91 14 .438 0.6% 0.2% 0.8% 0.0%
Team W L GB PCT Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win%
Los Angeles Dodgers 101 61 .623 92.7% 5.9% 98.7% 18.5%
San Diego Padres 87 75 14 .537 6.0% 43.4% 49.4% 2.7%
Arizona Diamondbacks 82 80 19 .506 1.3% 17.7% 18.9% 0.8%
Colorado Rockies 72 90 29 .444 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0%
San Francisco Giants 69 93 32 .426 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%

Read the rest of this entry »


Effectively Wild Episode 1515: The Waiting Game

EWFI
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller banter about life during self-isolation and delayed media consumption and explore some of the long-considered and ultimately rejected article ideas in Sam’s tickler file, including Ken Griffey Jr.’s rap career, an undiscovered baseball star in Yosemite, an advance-scouting conspiracy theory, an unorthodox solution to extra-inning games, and a complaint about baseball inspired by Shel Silverstein (plus a brief baseball coronavirus update and the recommended baseball distraction of the day, about the new Statcast system and Hawk-Eye).

Audio intro: John Lennon, "Isolation"
Audio interstitial: Kid Sensation (Feat. Ken Griffey Jr.), "The Way I Swing"
Audio outro: Built to Spill, "The Wait"

Link to Timóteo video 1
Link to Timóteo video 2
Link to Timóteo video 3
Link to Statcast presentation video
Link to Statcast presentation summary
Link to Statcast presentation notes
Link to article about new Statcast physics
Link to order The MVP Machine

 iTunes Feed (Please rate and review us!)
 Sponsor Us on Patreon
 Facebook Group
 Effectively Wild Wiki
 Twitter Account
 Get Our Merch!
 Email Us: podcast@fangraphs.com


Plate Discipline, in One Number

How do you describe a batter’s plate discipline? I sometimes struggle with it. I might describe their walk rate and strikeout rate, maybe add in something about how often they swing. I’m never sure how much to weight walk rate and how much to care about strikeouts. How does someone with a 25% strikeout rate and 10% walk rate compare to someone with a 20% strikeout rate and a 7% walk rate?

What about Anthony Rizzo? He gets on base without swinging the bat fairly often, but it doesn’t show up in his walk rate, only in bags of ice and bruises. Getting hit by a pitch is marginally more valuable than a walk if you listen to our linear weights (because walks happen more often when there are bases open, while HBP tend to be random), but it doesn’t show up in the “plate discipline” numbers we’re used to looking at.

I’ve danced around this concept a few times here at FanGraphs. When I wrote about Joey Gallo’s new approach, I touched on how his strikeout and walk rates related to how good he needed to be on contact to succeed. When I wrote about Luis Arraez’s unique talents, I framed his walks and strikeouts in terms of what it meant for the rest of his contact. Behind the scenes, I’ve been using a standardized version of this calculation for quite a while. Today, with no baseball coming to save us, it’s time to explain my method.
Read the rest of this entry »


Ben Clemens FanGraphs Chat – 3/16/20

Read the rest of this entry »