Top 37 Prospects: San Francisco Giants
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the San Francisco Giants. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
Editor’s Note: Will Wilson was added to this list following his acquisition from the Los Angeles Angels as part of the Zack Cozart trade.
Dany Jimenez was added to this list following his selection by San Francisco in the Rule 5 Draft.
Jose Siri was added to this list at No. 28 after being claimed off waivers.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joey Bart | 22.9 | AA | C | 2021 | 60 |
| 2 | Marco Luciano | 18.1 | A- | SS | 2023 | 55 |
| 3 | Heliot Ramos | 20.2 | AA | RF | 2022 | 50 |
| 4 | Hunter Bishop | 21.4 | A- | CF | 2023 | 45+ |
| 5 | Luis Matos | 17.8 | R | CF | 2024 | 45+ |
| 6 | Logan Webb | 23.0 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 45 |
| 7 | Will Wilson | 21.4 | R | 2B | 2022 | 45 |
| 8 | Luis Toribio | 19.2 | A- | 3B | 2024 | 45 |
| 9 | Alexander Canario | 19.6 | A- | RF | 2023 | 45 |
| 10 | Mauricio Dubon | 25.4 | MLB | SS | 2020 | 45 |
| 11 | Jaylin Davis | 25.4 | MLB | RF | 2020 | 40+ |
| 12 | Seth Corry | 21.1 | A | LHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 13 | Gregory Santos | 20.2 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 14 | Sean Hjelle | 22.6 | AA | RHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 15 | Melvin Adon | 25.5 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40+ |
| 16 | Jairo Pomares | 19.3 | A- | CF | 2023 | 40+ |
| 17 | Prelander Berroa | 19.6 | A- | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 18 | Blake Rivera | 21.9 | A | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 19 | Kai-Wei Teng | 21.0 | A | RHP | 2023 | 40 |
| 20 | Camilo Doval | 22.4 | A+ | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 21 | Ricardo Genoves | 20.5 | A | C | 2021 | 40 |
| 22 | P.J. Hilson | 19.3 | R | CF | 2023 | 40 |
| 23 | Dilan Rosario | 18.4 | R | SS | 2024 | 40 |
| 24 | Aeverson Arteaga | 16.7 | R | SS | 2025 | 40 |
| 25 | Tristan Beck | 23.4 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 26 | Jake Wong | 23.2 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 27 | Kean Wong | 24.6 | MLB | 2B | 2020 | 40 |
| 28 | Jose Siri | 24.6 | AAA | CF | 2020 | 40 |
| 29 | Dany Jimenez | 24.2 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 30 | Trevor McDonald | 18.7 | R | RHP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 31 | Grant McCray | 19.0 | R | CF | 2024 | 35+ |
| 32 | Esmerlin Vinicio | 16.8 | R | LHP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 33 | Logan Wyatt | 22.0 | A | 1B | 2023 | 35+ |
| 34 | Raffi Vizcaino | 24.0 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 35 | Tyler Fitzgerald | 22.2 | A | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
| 36 | Garrett Frechette | 18.9 | R | 1B | 2024 | 35+ |
| 37 | Connor Cannon | 21.5 | A- | DH | 2023 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
They Might Be Giants
Joe McCarthy, OF/1B
Sam Wolff, RHP
Abiatal Avelino, INF
Chris Shaw, 1B
Rico Garcia, RHP
Rodolfo Martinez, RHP
Jose Marte, RHP
Carlos Sano, RHP
This group is full of Quad-A types who might get an opportunity to prove something in the big leagues next year considering where the Giants are in their rebuild. Most of these guys are in their mid-20s. We liked McCarthy as a high-OBP corner platoon guy for the last several years, but he had yet another back issue in 2019 and needs to prove he can stay healthy now. The same goes for Wolff, who has 40 FV stuff but a long injury history. You could argue Avelino belongs where Kean Wong is on the main section of the list, but give us the lefty bat. Shaw has huge power but we don’t think he’ll hit. Eric has seen Garcia sit 93-96 for spurts, with about average secondaries. He was claimed off waivers. Martinez is one of several hard-throwing arms in the system who have had injury or consistency issues. Rodolfo will show you 91-97 and touch 100, a wider range than usual. Marte also throws hard, up to 99, but it doesn’t play like an elite fastball. Sano was hurt most of last year. He’s up to 96 with plus vertical movement. One of these arms should end up sticking.
Body Beautiful with Power
Carter Aldrete, RF
George Bell Jr., LF
Jacob Heyward, RF
Jacob Gonzalez, 1B
Armani Smith, OF
All of these guys have big raw, but play a corner and don’t have the hit tool to be on the main section of the list. Aldrete was an infielder as an underclassman at ASU but moved to the outfield as a junior. Bell was on last year’s list but didn’t take a step forward. Heyward has performed at every level and he walks a ton, but he’s always been quite old for the level. Scouts love Gonzalez’s makeup, but he hit for shockingly little power this year and still projects as a first baseman rather than his current third. Smith, like Bell last year, hit during his first pro summer and he looks the part in the uniform, so we’re monitoring him.
Two Long-Term Projects
Victor Bericoto, 1B
Anthony Rodriguez, SS
Bericoto was promoted from the DSL late in the summer, along with Luis Matos. He’s an advanced hitter but first base is a tough profile and Bericoto’s tools don’t pop. Rodriguez is another 2019 J2 signee, inked for $800,000 out of Venezuela. He’s a projectable switch-hitter with some twitch and bat speed, but the swing is pretty rough.
Sneaky Sneaky
Matt Frisbee, RHP
Kervin Castro, RHP
Luis Amaya, LHP
Izzy Munguia, OF
Jesus Tona, RHP
Frisbee has carved the lower levels with 90-94, plus vertical movement, and plus slider command. He’s 23. If he does it at Double-A next year, he’ll be a 40 FV. Castro is up to 95, he backspins his fastball, and flashes a plus changeup. He’s 20, but is built like a catcher. Speaking of catchers, there’s a full Tona writeup here. Amaya also has a sneaky fastball. It’s only about 91-92 but he hides the ball well and it sneaks past hitters. His 11-to-5 curveball is average. Munguia is tiny but he plays his ass off and puts the bat on the ball at an abnormal rate.
System Overview
We still have much to learn about how the talent acquisition under new Baseball Ops President Farhan Zaidi will go. Not only can we look back at his time with Oakland and the Dodgers for clues, but we can do the same for the relatively new heads of the pro and amateur staffs, as well as fresh-faced General Manager Scott Harris.
Harris has roots in the Commissioner’s office and, more recently, with the Cubs, where he earned his MBA at Northwestern while simultaneously serving as the team’s baseball ops director. He’ll probably be less involved in what we’re interested in than amateur director Michael Holmes, who comes from Oakland, and pro director Zack Minasian, who comes from Milwaukee.
Oakland targeted toolsy, high-upside athletes early in drafts while focusing on college performers on Day Two. Those college performers, some of whom typically came in under slot, enabled Oakland to scoop up an over-slot high schooler or two on Day Two or early on Day Three. The Giants took this exact approach last year, saving about $1 million early on, then spreading that to a few high schoolers as the draft progressed. They pick 13th next year in a draft that’s currently seen as quite deep, so this strategy might yield more talent than normal.
Minasian was with Milwaukee for nearly half of our lifetimes, and over that span, several regimes came and went. Under former Astros Assistant GM David Stearns, the Brewers began to axe scouts this year, after Minasian left. Whether he is bringing that approach with him to San Francisco, we don’t know. The Milwaukee rebuild that yielded most of the current pitching staff and the pieces that were sent to Miami for Christian Yelich were mostly collected by departments helmed by Minasian and Rey Montgomery. Lewis Brinson, Isan Díaz, Josh Hader, Luis Ortiz, Brett Phillips, Zach Davies and Freddy Peralta were all picked up during this stretch. That’s pretty tools-centric on the hitters’ side, and deals often included multiple players sent back to Milwaukee. Last year’s trade deadline adds in San Francisco (Davis/Teng/Berroa, Dubon) have a similar feel.
Let’s see which Quad-A hitters (Tyler Austin, Connor Joe, Jaylin Davis, Aaron Altherr, etc.) end up sticking; the club is cycling through a ton. We’ve thrown our dart at Davis.
They Might Be Giants is an 80 grade name for that particular prospect tier.
Thanks Eric and Kiley for getting out of the box so fast on this off-season’s batch of organizational reports. I wasn’t tracking Carter Aldrete before. A little internet research reveals his being Mike Aldrete’s nephew, so I’ll be pulling for the kid to make it, since Mike is a favorite former Giant of mine.
Glad to see a Matt Frisbee mention(even in the other guys sections). I couldn’t find anything at all on him.
80-grade name for a pitcher with silly dominant stats in A+.
Hunter Bishop is projected to reach the majors in 2023 at age 25? A #10 overall college pick spending 4+ years in the minors to reach the majors seems like a fail to me.
An no mention of Franklin Labour at all?
“Built like a boulder stacked on two Iberico hams ” … a big thumb’s up for the phrase.
Lots of guys with power and defensive profiles that look like they’ll live in a corner, huh? It’s an awfully good list though. The context on Bart is important and that makes him look really good, and Luciano looks like he could be a superstar. They’re the likely building blocks of the next great Giants team. Beyond that, Hunter Bishop has a pretty unusual stat line, and he may need to get more aggressive given his power and the high walk/strikeout rate, but it sounds like he could be a third building block. You could do a lot worse than that. I’m curious to see what they’re going to do with Buster Posey when Bart is ready–probably let him catch 200+ PAs and let him give Belt a breather at first once in a while, but it does seem like a waste of his behind-the-plate skills.
I’m also starting to really like Heliot Ramos, but if they’re looking to move someone he’s the one I would try to move. He struck out much more than I would like but he also did all of that at age 19, and the 25% K rate where he spent most of the year is actually a pretty big improvement over the last time he showed power. One thing I would worry about is that San Francisco swallows power to right field, and so he might not be able to reap as much benefit from that profile as he would in, say, Milwaukee or Yankee Stadium. In a perfect world, what I would like to see is swap Ramos for Deivi Garcia, who would be awesome playing in San Francisco but his profile at Yankee Stadium is awfully scary, but challenge trades never happen so it’s moot (also the Yankees already have Aaron Judge and Stanton, so unless HIcks never recovers and Ramos stays in center there isn’t much room).
Apparently San Fran is moving the right center fence in to move the bullpen from foul territory to behind the fences. That should be interesting. Probably still a solid pitchers park, but might not be as extreme next year.
Are the “next likely building blocks” for the next great team ever the “actual” building blocks? A solid top 10 might be, but the top three never turn out to all be best case scenarios. I see a lot of volatility in this list. The attrition rate from this group is going to be huge. Take Bart for example – the safe one. There is no reason to assume that he will ever be able to handle the rigors of everyday catching. That is the most important skill he needs and its one that most people don’t have. Those injuries that come with the position often slide the offensive production back a lot. There is a very real chance he ends up something like Mike Zunino. The all-world defense isn’t a given either.Not saying I have a strong opinion on it but catcher defense is notoriously problematic to quantify so skepticism should be exercised there too. I am a Giants fan and I think this list is exciting but also very volatile. It is interesting that the Giants do not have a track record of developing players from the high risk molds. They are excellent at maximizing average tools – I wonder how that will translate. SF has made a living from maximizing the grinder types.
+1 on the surprising omission of Franklin Labour – would be very interested to hear what Kiley and Eric think of him, regardless of what section of the list they think he belongs on
I wonder why Logan Webb’s fastball velocity never fully returned after he got suspended for PEDs.
#NotGraphs (Hate doing anything eye test related with FG comments) Luciano looks really good, on paper and otherwise, but something about his hands while rotating through his swing seems off. It’s like his hands were trained to rotate with his lower half through his swing, but they’re off a bit and not actually optimally loaded. I think a frame by frame comp with a young Miggy would show his hands are not connected. Like he pushes at the last second with his hands, rather than just rotating fully connected with his lower half.
One thing is for certain, his flaws are his own. He wasn’t going to be perfect until someone trained him to do things wrong. Everyone has flaws. That rant aside, he is clearly an athlete first – I think that is what you see. He isn’t a natural hitter and it doesn’t look quite right because he isn’t that polished yet. That is the curse of extreme athleticism – you can get away with not doing things right when you are a man among boys. The fact that his value has come from showcases and not games doesn’t help either. He lacks consistency and repeatable mechanics. He is just trying to hit the ball as hard as he can which gets you noticed as a kid and probably generates some nice metrics, which is what makes him a top prospect. The hitting has a long ways to go but hes young so that isn’t a real problem. There just aren’t many good reasons to finely critique the mechanics or the results – I would like to hope that there is development left. That said, I do like the potential that he brings but I wouldn’t make any generalizations about the swing as they are not even consistent in a single session of BP. He has what I would call an HR derby approach – just trying to launch moonshots with little consistency from what I have seen. I think that is where he is as a hitter but pro instruction will force him to address that – it probably already has. To abeLincoln above, the problems are not with his raw power which would be what having hip rotation and load issues would yield. Hips lead hands. If hips are too far in front you look like bad Javy Baez – if hips are not too far in front you look like good Javy Baez.
Just in case anyone is curious, the running BOARD value:
ARI $279.5M
SFG $207.0M
That’s an increase from $200M on the 2019 BOARD for the Giants.
Bart and Luciano are obviously so dang exciting, but I love the details throughout for some of the lesser prospects, coming from a non-Giants fan. All this to say, thanks for all your hard work. It makes being a prospect fan (I don’t know if that’s a thing?) so much easier.
I watch a lot of Eastern League baseball and I have been a fan of Mauricio Dubon since he simply raked at Portland in 2016 and believe he will prove to be a very solid player for the Giants. The injury set him back but he is a much better hitter than he is generally being given credit for. Baseball Reference has him projected to hit 10 HR’s in only 256 PA’s in 2020. That seems a little rich but he did hit 20 HR’s this past year.
Marco write-up…… LOVE
I didn’t realize Bart was only looking at around a 45 hit tool. The power and fielding I knew about, but I maybe just assumed there was better hit tool here. This makes me a bit more curious what his career might look like.
Bart has some contact issues apparently. He strikes out quite a bit and doesn’t walk much. In 2019 he had 71:21 K/BB ratio. Just 21 walks in 338 plate appearances is not great.
That will tank his progressive metrics in reality if it goes much lower. Being above a well above average hitter but being slightly averse to walks yields close to average wOBAs and such.
It reads a bit like Mike Zunino. I am dumbfounded that we are not using that comp. Its like we are not acknowledging the floor at all. I see the ratio of XBH/HR as being a bit low. The raw numbers look like a guy that hits a lot of FB and makes a lot of bad contact.
Luis Matos and Luciano will both be top 10 within 2 years. Marco the Vlad Jr. to Matos being Bichette like. You heard it hear first!
And likely last!
Whoever wrote up Luciano has been reading too many cheap romance novels.
My hyperbole meter is putting up some really high readings today! Mike Alstott was 6’1″, 250 and a fullback. Reminiscing of amateur heroics? An organizational eye for bat speed? As a reader here for the scouting reports, I am left hoping for more objective insight.
The writeup for Luciano is scintillating but he is slotted in behind Kristian Robinson on the BOARD. Is it close enough that it comes down to personal preference between those two?
Rayner Santana is not even worth a mention? Or do they have to come stateside before they are “on your radar”?