Fading Since the Trade Deadline: The Teams Whose Odds Have Fallen the Furthest

The Cardinals survived Willson Contreras‘ first extended absence due to injury, going 24-16 while their catcher/designated hitter was sidelined for six weeks due to a fractured left forearm. Despite his loss, the ineffectiveness of cornerstones Paul Goldschmidt and Nolan Arenado, and a host of other issues, they were still in contention for a playoff spot when the July 30 trade deadline approached — not in great shape, but with a roster worth augmenting for the stretch run. But by the time Contreras suffered a fractured middle finger on his right hand as a result of an errant Pablo López pitch on August 24, it was clear that this wouldn’t be the Cardinals’ year. They had already shaken up their roster with a couple of notable demotions, and by the end of the month, they let deadline acquisition Tommy Pham depart via waivers.
The Cardinals aren’t the only team whose playoff hopes withered some time between the trade deadline and Labor Day, just the one that made the most noise on the transaction wire. Based on the changes in our Playoff Odds, here are the teams that suffered the steepest declines from the close of play on July 29 (i.e., the day before the deadline) through Monday:
| Team | W | L | W% | Div | WC | Playoffs | W | L | W% | Div | WC | Playoffs | Net Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariners | 56 | 52 | .519 | 40.6% | 8.3% | 48.9% | 69 | 69 | .500 | 2.5% | 3.3% | 5.8% | -43.1% |
| Red Sox | 56 | 50 | .528 | 1.5% | 1.4% | 42.0% | 70 | 68 | .507 | 0.0% | 14.0% | 14.0% | -28.0% |
| Cardinals | 54 | 52 | .509 | 7.9% | 14.9% | 22.7% | 69 | 69 | .500 | 0.0% | 0.9% | 1.0% | -21.7% |
| Giants | 53 | 55 | .491 | 0.4% | 17.3% | 17.6% | 68 | 70 | .493 | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.4% | -17.2% |
| Pirates | 54 | 52 | .509 | 5.8% | 10.1% | 15.9% | 64 | 73 | .467 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | -15.9% |
| Mets | 56 | 50 | .528 | 1.5% | 50.0% | 51.6% | 74 | 64 | .536 | 1.0% | 34.7% | 35.8% | -15.8% |
As you can see from the table, not all of these situations are alike. The Mariners and Mets had roughly a coin-flip chance of making the playoffs as of July 29, and the Red Sox’s odds weren’t much lower. The other teams were long shots to begin with; they hadn’t thrown in the towel yet, but things haven’t gone their way since, and by now their demises have simplified the playoff picture.
What follows here is a closer look at each of those situations, starting from the bottom of the table.
Mets
The lone team here with a winning record since the trade deadline (18-14) — and thus more than a faint chance of making the playoffs — is one that figured to spend this season retooling following last summer’s sell-off. With Kodai Senga shelved due to a shoulder strain, and Francisco Lindor and Jeff McNeil among their regulars off to slow starts, the Mets were 11 games below .500 as of June 2 (24-35). But between the return of Francisco Alvarez from a left thumb sprain, the addition and surprising breakout of infielder/budding pop star Jose Iglesias, the emergence of Mark Vientos as an offensive force, and the MVP-caliber play of Lindor, the Mets climbed off the mat. They went 32-15 from June 3 through July 29, and at the trade deadline they addressed their lineup, rotation, and bullpen by adding Jesse Winker, Paul Blackburn, Ryne Stanek, and Huascar Brazobán.
Alas — with the Mets, there’s usually an alas, isn’t there? — they lost eight of their first 13 after the deadline, a stretch that included their scoring just one run during a three-game sweep by the Mariners in Seattle. They have refused to go quietly, however, even with the Padres and Diamondbacks rocketing past them in the Wild Card standings. Walk-off homers by Alvarez and Winker against the Orioles on August 19 and 21 pulled the Mets to within a game and a half of the third Wild Card spot, and they’ve gone 8-3 since via a road trip through San Diego, Arizona, and the South Side of Chicago, followed by Monday’s return home against the Red Sox. They’re now just half a game behind the Braves for the third Wild Card spot, with their highest Playoff Odds since August 8. This race ain’t over.
Pirates
Despite their current record, this has easily been the Pirates’ most interesting season since 2018, when they finished 82-79, and perhaps their most interesting since their ’13–15 run of three straight Wild Card teams. That’s thanks in large part to a revamped rotation featuring rookies Paul Skenes and Jared Jones, as well as the return of Oneil Cruz after a season lost to a fractured ankle. The Pirates bolted from the gate, winning nine of their first 11 games, but they were nonetheless just 17-22 when Skenes, last year’s no. 1 draft pick, debuted on May 11. He quickly took his place among the majors’ most dominant pitchers, throwing six hitless innings with 11 strikeouts in his second start on May 17, and has delivered a 2.23 ERA and 2.72 FIP with a 32.3% strikeout rate, second among qualified starters since his arrival.
The Pirates won nine of Skenes’ first 12 starts, and by July 22 were just 3.5 games out of a playoff spot, with 25.2% odds, their highest since April. They were busy ahead of the deadline, acquiring infielder Isiah Kiner-Falefa, outfielder Bryan De La Cruz, and a couple of relievers while dealing away Martín Pérez.
Very little has gone right since. The team lost 10 in a row from August 4–14 against the Diamondbacks (one game), Padres (six games) and Dodgers (three games), and went 8-19 in August. Neither Kiner-Falefa (62 wRC+) nor De La Cruz (33 wRC+) has hit a lick since their respective trades, though they’ve had plenty of company, with Ke’Bryan Hayes, Connor Joe, Bryan Reynolds, and Michael A. Taylor all playing at replacement level or worse. Meanwhile, the pitching staff has been lit for a 5.31 ERA and 4.64 FIP since the deadline, with shaky former All-Star David Bednar blowing three saves, allowing 14 runs in 10.2 innings, and ultimately losing his job as closer. The most interesting thing about the Pirates lately is the decision to move Cruz — who’s been one of the team’s most effective hitters (.271/.327/.466, 114 wRC+) — from shortstop to center field, a decision that nonetheless signaled it was time to play out the string.
Giants
The February and March additions of Jorge Soler, Blake Snell, and Matt Chapman boosted the Giants’ odds to 43.4%, the sixth-highest in the NL. Perhaps because they didn’t have normal springs to prepare, however, all three started slowly, and the rest of the team plodded on as well. The Giants were just 29-29 at the end of May, and 41-44 at the end of June, with Snell carrying a 9.51 ERA into July while landing on the injured list twice. The team actually didn’t spend a day in July above .500, and they dealt Soler and Alex Cobb away but held onto Snell despite heavy interest; they also added Bay Area favorite Mark Canha from the Tigers.
Snell rewarded the Giants’ faith by throwing a no-hitter against the Reds on August 2, part of an 8-2 run that propelled the Giants to a season-high three games above .500 (61-58) as of August 10. The problem by then was that the Padres and Diamondbacks had surged to the top of the Wild Card standings — and even put a scare into the NL West-leading Dodgers — leaving the Giants in the dust:

After that, the Giants lost four in a row, and they’ve continued to slide to the point that they’re back below .500 again thanks in large part to an offense that’s hit just .220/.280/.376 since the deadline, with an 84 wRC+, tied with the Rockies for the NL’s worst in that span. Should have stuck with the Soler power, amirite?
Cardinals
Despite their rocky start and the loss of their best hitter, the Cardinals weathered Contreras’ absence. While they were hardly a powerhouse — given the struggles of Arenado, Goldschmidt, Nolan Gorman and their center fielders, not to mention their overhauled-but-still-mediocre pitching — as of July 8, they were 48-42, 4.5 games out of first place, with Playoff Odds of 34.3%. They stumbled along through the rest of July, even losing series to the Pirates and Nationals, and merely splitting with the Cubs.
Nonetheless, the Cardinals were active at the deadline, trading for Pham and Erick Fedde, albeit at the cost of the versatile Tommy Edman, who had yet to play for them in 2024 but who had looked as though he could help shore up the production at second base and/or in center field. Things quickly fell apart, as they lost 12 of their first 17 games in August while allowing nearly five runs per game. On August 21, they optioned the disappointing Gorman and Jordan Walker — two of their top position playing prospects of recent years — to Triple-A Memphis. Gorman was hitting just .203/.271/.400 (86 wRC+) with a 37.6% strikeout rate and subpar defense at second, while Walker, who had been up for just a couple weeks after spending four months at Memphis ironing out his mechanics and approach, had hit .145/.228/.232 (32 wRC+) in 79 PA to that point.
Contreras’ broken finger was just the coup de grâce. While the Cardinals have gone 5-4 since, they DFA’d Pham, who was claimed by the Royals, and brought back Walker in order to play him every day while enduring the usual growing pains. He had a five-hit game that included his first homer of the season in a 14-7 win at Yankee Stadium on Sunday, but at this point, it’s too little, too late.
Red Sox
After back-to-back 78-win seasons, this year’s Red Sox have made for a much more compelling team. With surprisingly strong starting pitching, and breakouts by Jarren Duran, Wilyer Abreu, and Connor Wong, they weathered the major injuries of Trevor Story and Triston Casas. At the All-Star break, they were 53-43, with a 1.5-game cushion for the third Wild Card spot and still just games five out of first place in the AL East.
The rest of July didn’t go as well. The Red Sox lost seven of 10 games heading into the deadline, slipping to 2.5 games out of a Wild Card spot, and while they made several moves, nothing they did amounted to an impact addition — an all-too-familiar situation for John Henry’s club in recent years. They reacquired James Paxton, and added Danny Jansen and a few bullpen pieces, including Luis García and Lucas Sims, but even those moves have largely backfired. Paxton made just three starts before returning to his all-too-familiar home on the injured list. Jansen made history by playing for both the Blue Jays and Red Sox in a suspended game but has hit for just a 64 wRC+ for his new team. García and Sims made a hash of their high-leverage opportunities, combining to allow 22 runs in 20.2 innings before landing on the IL, having made significant contributions to the bullpen’s 5.59 ERA and 5.20 FIP since the deadline.
With the exception of a strong stretch from Brayan Bello, the rotation has largely regressed in that time as well, and for as great a human interest story as the latest Rich Hill comeback may be, his workload isn’t going to turn things around. While the Sox remain fourth in the AL Wild Card race, they’re now closer to last place in the AL East (3.5 games) than qualifying for the postseason (4.5 games).
Mariners
Perhaps some of the managers of the teams above will pay the price for their squads’ August fades. Mariners manager Scott Servais already has, having been fired on August 23 and replaced by Dan Wilson. The team led the AL West by as many as 10 games on June 18, when they were 44-31, but it’s been mostly downhill since, as they lost 20 of their next 29 games while the Astros caught up:

Still, Seattle was tied for the division lead at the deadline, and they made some big moves, dealing for Randy Arozarena and Justin Turner to inject some life into their moribund offense, and Yimi García to upgrade their bullpen. Arozarena (111 wRC+) and Turner (109 wRC+) have helped, but the offense has produced a 97 wRC+ on either side of the deadline with only a slight reduction in their major league-high strikeout rate (27.8% before, 26.6% after). Their scoring has actually improved, but their run prevention has eroded; they’ve gone 13-17 since the deadline despite outscoring opponents:
| Splt | RS | RA | W% | Pyth% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Through July 29 | 3.88 | 3.71 | .519 | .520 |
| Since July 30 | 4.30 | 4.13 | .433 | .518 |
Within what has generally been a top-notch rotation that still owns the majors’ lowest ERA (3.53) and third-lowest FIP (3.77) — some of which owes to park effects — both George Kirby and Luis Castillo have picked the wrong time to struggle. García hasn’t done well (though Stanek, whom he replaced, has been worse with the Mets) within a bullpen that has netted -0.7 WAR since the deadline; only the Red Sox (-1.0) have been worse. Though the Mariners’ playoff hopes haven’t been completely extinguished, they’re 5.5 games out of the third Wild Card spot and six back in the division race, headed towards their 22nd miss of the postseason in 23 years. Ouch.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
The Mets have been better than expected, but the rest of these teams aren’t really surprises at all.
Even signing Matt Chapman wasn’t going to fix the Giants’ offensive issues, which were obvious from the word go, so them regressing badly isn’t a surprise. Also, so much of their starting pitching was tied to Jordan Hicks, who definitely had an IP limit from the beginning. Unlike the Braves, who signed Reynaldo Lopez as a swingman/5th starter who way overperformed, Hicks was the Plan A for the third rotation spot. At least Heliot Ramos looks like a cornerstone moving forward.
The Cards have depth out the wazoo, but unless Goldy and Arenado both bounced back big, they were going to struggle. Their best defenders struggle to hit, and their best hitters struggle to defend. They also didn’t have as much pitching as it looked like on the surface. Gray’s continued to be an ageless wonder, but Gibson, Lynn, Mikolas, and Matz all had big flags. Pallante has been a pleasant surprise, though.
Barring an Oneil Cruz explosion, the Pirates weren’t going to have even an average offense this year. The pitching has been stellar, but it’s more of a “build for the future” year than an actual chance to contend. Bart’s acquisition and subsequent recapturing of his top prospect status has been a big plus for them moving forward.
The Red Sox got multiple breakouts on both sides of the ball, but sustaining their performance perfectly over the year was always a long shot, especially with clear holes in the lineup. They still look like a building squad that could challenge the Os and Yankees in the next few seasons.
The Mariners, they had the starting pitching to make a big push, but the offense and the bullpen would determine if they’d finish it out, and both have failed them, unsurprisingly. Only the Rangers being much worse than expected kept them in first for so long.
Did anyone actually think STL had a good rotation to begin with? Gray I’ll give you. The rest of the guys – Gibson, Lynn, Mikolas, and Matz – were all literal hopefuls to have ERAs under 5.
The Mariners keep looking around to place blame, but after nine seasons of .500 ball and missing the playoffs consistently it’s past time to look at the GM.
Matz was expected to post under 4, as he did that two of the last three seasons with indicators of the same the one year he didn’t. There was reason to hope Mikolas could rebound as well; he looked exactly the same as the high 3s low 4s ERA guy he’d been his whole career. Lynn and Gibson were just innings fillers.
Looking closer at Matz, I’ll agree with you on that one.
The rest? Hope isn’t a strategy…
Betting on rebounds that look reasonable, then.
In retrospect, most of these teams just weren’t that good to begin with and were playing over their heads. The Red Sox were getting huge production out of Tanner Houck, Nick Pivetta, Kutter Crawford, and Cooper Criswell and that didn’t make any sense. The Cardinals had something like a -45 run differential despite having a winning record. The Pirates didn’t exactly have an infield. It’s probably not a surprise these teams faded.
But the Mariners…the Mariners just didn’t understand how bad their offense was. Trading for Arozarena was a great move but the whole infield was a mess and they only thing they did was replace Ty France with Justin Turner which was a lateral move. Meanwhile, here’s a brief list of third basemen and their wRC+ from August 1 to the present.
Jazz Chisholm: 166 (available at trade deadline, they probably would have played him at 2B)
Matt Chapman: 135 (available in offseason)
Paul DeJong: 134 (available at trade deadline)
Eugenio Suarez: 132 (was given away by Mariners to D-Backs last offseason)
Josh Rojas: 65 (current Mariners’ third baseman)
Seattle’s offense has been relatively close to average since the trade deadline (23rd) but they really blew it by thinking one player was going to be enough.
I don’t know if they thought “one player was going to be enough” so much as Dipoto just couldn’t come to another deal. For example, I don’t doubt Seattle had an offer on the table for Chisholm, and figure Miami simply liked the Yankees 50FV catching prospect better than they liked Seattle’s. Dipoto wasn’t the only GM with agency at the trade deadline.
As much heat as the batters have taken for for the disappointing 69-69, the lineup has been, as you note, a close to average group all season even accounting for the the Four Horsemen of the Replacement Level Veteran Apocalypse who undermine the effort.
It’s the bullpen that has absolutely killed them during the collapse – that bunch is running a 5.00+ FIP and -1.0 WAR since July 1. It’s a painful way to go.
Meanwhile, the Padres aggressively picked up Jason Adam and Tanner Scott to buttress a bullpen that was already pretty good. M’s conservativeness looks bad by comparison. Also consider that having an army of high-leverage relievers becomes even more paramount in the postseason. So if a team was serious about winning the trophy and not just limping in to the dancehall, addressing a weak bullpen at the trade deadline would seem to be a no-brainer.
Cannot disagree, though to be fair and balanced, the Mariners did make a swell trade for Y Garcia only to see him post a 7.29 FIP and -.04 fWAR over 9 innings before getting hurt.
I don’t know that I would call the offense “close to average” for the season – 28th in wOBA, 20th in wRC+, 22nd in WPA, 21st in runs above replacement. It hasn’t been “league-worst awful” but it has been pretty, pretty bad.
(You’re absolutely correct that the bullpen isn’t helping matters any lately)
Mitchell Moore is correct about this because pretty much anyone between 12 and 21 on any of these metrics is “close to average”. They’re 20th in wRC+ and 19th in offensive WAR but they have a 97 wRC+ on the year. (I think wOBA is not park adjusted either, which is a lot of the reason why they are so low there)
I don’t think any of this would be so bad if it wasn’t for the fact that the Mariners spent all offseason trying to cut costs and the infamous “.540 energy” they give off. They gave away Suarez and the team would have been far better with Chapman on it too. Those decisions looked smart for the first half of the year and now definitely do not look good. I know much of this (if not the vast majority of it) is that ownership is cheap but it still doesn’t make it any better.
They need to find a way to get another infielder who can hit. I don’t know how they do it, because a lot of the guys they would want aren’t available or are going to be on terrible contracts. But they’re going to waste that amazing rotation if they can’t put runs on the board.
Dipoto’s off-season cost-cutting remodel felt like a short-sighted recipe for disaster as it unfolded, and it’s been every bit of that 138 games in. Bad enough, but it’s the second off-season in a row his reinforcements flopped badly, and he’ll no doubt be remodeling again this off-season under the standing payroll constraints. I could see him trading Castillo to get out from under the 3/$72m they owe him.
Look at the standings: if they were playing .540 they’d be breathing up the astros backs. And holding the 3rd WC.
The mistake was in choosing those specific hitters more than aiming for .540 on the cheap. Atlanta, KC, and NYM are around there today.
If he only had a budget for .540 a better crew would have gotten him there. And closer to the playoffs. It’s a failure of execution.
“Aiming for .540 on the cheap” is still a problem. You’re as likely to end up below as above and doing it on the cheap perhaps more likely.
At the same time, aiming for a borderline playoff spot increases the penalty of minor variability. Drop just 1 game off pace and you’re at .532 and back on the outside of the WC.
Maybe.
But if DiPoto was given a budget that didn’t allow for premium reinforcements (Pittsburg, Cleveland, Tampa Bay, Milwaukee and even San Diego, among others, had to deal with budget straightjackets too) it was up to him to make the most of it.
So again, aiming for .540 meant aiming for a competitive team . He didn’t misread the league because .540 teams are still competitive in Sept. It was not an unreasonable goal.
The target forced on him isn’t the issue, it is the players not living up to their reputation.
Maybe he chose poorly who to sign or maybe it is “luck” but the fact is they missed the target. Now, if they actually *were* at .540 and out of the running then you could blame the strategy. But they’re not. They are at .500 and a good ways from the target given the games left.
Seattle is 20th in wRC+.
The Red Sox, perhaps more than any other team, have been damaged severely by their acquisitions at he deadline. It is impossible to overstate just how terrible Luis Garcia was and Lucas Sims was no better. The loss of Justin Slaten and Chris Martin for extended periods hit them hard and Jansen has also added nothing. Breslow did not do anything to enhance his popularity with Red Sox Nation but help may be on the way in the form of the Fab Four.
It may be that late signings impacted players, but I am uncomfortable with the #narrative around it that doesn’t yet seem supported by hard data. There’s Montgomery; there’s also Snell. Was Soler slowed by a late signing? Francisco Lindor has no such concerns, and yet, also got off to a slow start.
Right now, I see a lot of coincidence, and surely, it’s to be investigated. But without correlation, it seems a lot like an owner-favorable parable about the dangers of pushing for money in free agency.
I always feel a bit bad for the 2013-2015 Pirates. They had some great, fun teams but just timed it perfectly wrong to hit maximum buzzsaws while they were good. I’m pretty sure they had the second most wins in the majors over that stretch, but unfortunately the only team with more (STL) happened to live in their division, so it was three wildcards and no division titles.
In 2014 they ran into Bumgarner in the wild card game in That Postseason. In 2015 they hit Jake Arrieta at the peak of his powers. What a tough draw.
And let us remember NOT THAT I’M BITTER that the one-game Wild Card play-in had just been instituted in 2012. Without it the Pirates would have gotten a full series in 14-15 and would’ve been able to pitch Liriano twice in the 13 series, which went to five games.
Also, during this entire period, the team that pushed them into the wild card and beat them in the playoffs was benefiting from some extra knowledge gained by one of their staff members committing a federal crime. Not that I’m bitter.
(In before anyone points it out, the Astros hack probably didn’t affect the major-league team much in this time. And what I’m really bitter about is the way ownership cheap-assed the team during what should’ve been their window, leading to absurdities like Jon Niese being installed in an unshakeable roster spot and attaching two prospects to a Lirano salary dump, though what really doomed them was McCutchen suddenly becoming merely OK at age 28.)
While true in 2015, in 2014 the Giants and Pirates had identical records. It would have been a one-game playoff even under the pre-2012 format
Don’t forget Ray Searage and company not having the wherewithal to unlock Cole’s potential, which the Astros were able to do in about 10 minutes.
In hindsight, their year to make a “big” move at the deadline was probably 2014. After a slow start (18-26), Pittsburgh went 39-25 up to July 31 and were 2.5 out of the division. That’s when they should have made a move for someone like David Price.
Yes, they allegedly didn’t make a big move then because they were going for some kind of perpetual lowish-budget contention like the Rays or (then) Indians, so they couldn’t trade prospects. And then they didn’t invest any more money to keep the cycle going, and their Moneyball strategy turned out to be sticking with the pitching approach that had succeeded in 13-15 long after it was outmoded. So they mostly wasted Cole and almost entirely wasted Morton.
I think the chart is self explanatory (left half is as of July 29, and right half is as of Sep 2), but on mobile the chart headers only show W, L, etc and do not show W1 or W2 as they should per the chart caption.
“ All categories ending in 1 (W1, L1, etc.) as of close of play on July 29, all ending in 2 as of close of play on Sept. 2.”
The whole Breslow > Bloom meme isn’t looking so obvious anymore
Was that ever a meme? Bloom did the job he was hired to do, namely cut major league payroll and rebuild the farm. It wasn’t fair to blame the Betts fiasco on him.
The team made a lot of good draft picks under Bloom’s leadership but his chaotic approach to roster building meant he needed to go.
If he learned anything about how to dial his crazier roster-churning tendencies down, then I maintain he would be a great fit for a team whose fans are exhausted and ready to check out like the Pirates. Bringing Tampa Bay style scouting / analysis / player DV to an underdog seems like a better fit than to a team like the Red Sox.
I asked this on another thread, but is Bloom any different than Cherington? They were both terrible at FA signings, mediocre in trades, supposedly good at drafting and development. I’m not a Sox fan, so I imagine I’m oversimplifying a bit here.
What specifically about Bloom’s tenure and tendencies makes him a fit for a budget team like the Bucs? Also wouldn’t more of a roster churn be a better fit for the Bucs? BC seems to acquire and keep players rather than trading them at peak value. I’d welcome the opposite, given that they probably should have traded Bednar last offseason and now they’re stuck with a bad bodied closer who ages about as well as milk on a countertop.
It is unclear to me how much of Bloom’s and Cherington’s successes in Boston was due to the infrastructure put in place before they ascended to the top job, but it is definitely true that the Red Sox drafted and developed players well when both were there.
I think the hope is similar to that of Cherington–that Bloom can bring in modern scouting / analysis / development techniques. The problem is that either Cherington is either behind the curve on the hitting side or poor at executing it. I think the hope is that Bloom is actually able to do those things that Cherington can’t.
The real issue for the Pirates is that most general manager candidates who can do those things aren’t really available to them. It’s not a blue chip job that will attract blue chip candidates. But Bloom should be available, because Bloom will do things that will alienate a team’s fanbase like trading away their starting catcher in the middle of the playoff race. He needs a place where the fans are already alienated and simply winning games will be enough to win them back over.
Supposedly the other finalist for the Bucs GM job was Matt Arnold. Whoops-biffed that decision. Whether BC has failed to implement his strategy or is behind the curve ultimately doesn’t matter. The results aren’t there. And he’s also spent incredibly poorly their limited financial resources. He needs to go.
They shouldn’t be hiring a former GM anyway. They should be raiding Baltimore’s or Arizona’s FO or any other FO that has shown they have a clue as to develop hitters. They don’t necessarily have to get a retread like Bloom. If you got a rotten apple, don’t go back to the barrel-go to the tree.
The Pgh job may not be a blue chip GM job, but there are only 30 of these positions in the world. If a candidate passes on Pgh because they think they’ll get a better one, that may not happen.