COVID-19 Roundup: Testing Could Be Key for Baseball’s Return
This is the latest installment of a daily series in which the FanGraphs staff rounds up the latest developments regarding the COVID-19 virus’ effect on baseball.
Following South Korea and Testing for COVID-19
South Korea could provide a roadmap for a return to play for major league baseball. According to the AP, the KBO is hoping for an early May restart.
On Wednesday, the country recorded 53 new infections, marking the third consecutive day that has seen new cases around the 50-mark. The downward trend from a Feb. 29 peak of 900 is increasing the chances of the 10-team Korea Baseball Organization (KBO) League not only starting in May but also playing a full 144-game season.
“If the situation continues to improve from here and on, teams will start facing each other in preseason games beginning on April 21, and we should be able to get the regular season started in early May,” KBO secretary general Ryu Dae-hwan said after a meeting with club general managers in Seoul.
While a lot can happen in a month, that’s certainly some promising news on the baseball front as well as for South Korea. One of the key factors for success in South Korea has been testing:
Dr. Angela Caliendo said Tuesday that South Korea’s experience “shows you the importance of testing.”
“I do think the testing they did in South Korea was very important in controlling their outbreak,” said Caliendo, an infectious diseases professor at Brown University’s Alpert Medical School.
With their widespread testing program, South Korean authorities were able to identify infected people, isolate them and trace their contacts with other people, who then also could be tested.
If the United States had adequate testing, “you could consider areas of the country that are at different points of the virus” spread progression, Caliendo said during a call with reporters arranged by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
How They Got There: The 1990-1999 NL MVPs
Where in the player ranks do MVPs come from? As unpredictable as baseball can be, this particular question has a very simple answer for the most part. If we go back through the years, there aren’t too many award winners whose origins deviate too much from a few common paths. MVPs largely are who we thought they were: established superstars, former top prospects, former first round draft picks. In some cases, all of the above are true.
But the stories of how those MVPs ended up with their particular teams can still be intriguing. Some were drafted by the team with which they won the award, including a few, like Bryce Harper and Joe Mauer, who were drafted first overall. Others were traded away only to find success (and some shiny hardware) on another squad.
Here’s a look back at how the NL MVPs of the 1990s were acquired.
| Rank | Name | Team | Age | How Acquired | PA | HR | SB | OPS | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVP | Barry Bonds | PIT | 25 | Drafted 1st Rd (6) ’85 | 621 | 33 | 52 | .970 | 165 | 9.9 |
| 2nd | Bobby Bonilla | PIT | 27 | Trade (CHW) Jul’86 | 686 | 32 | 4 | .841 | 127 | 3.8 |
| 3rd | Darryl Strawberry | NYM | 28 | Drafted 1st Rd (1) ’80 | 621 | 37 | 15 | .879 | 141 | 6.5 |
Barry Bonds was just one several college baseball stars being considered for the first overall pick in the 1985 draft. Despite his obvious talent, there were some questions about his makeup — his reputation for being cantankerous didn’t begin when he arrived in the major leagues — which may have contributed to him slipping to the Pirates, who held the sixth pick in the draft. Read the rest of this entry »
Dan Szymborski FanGraphs Chat – 4/9/20
| 12:01 |
: Fat
|
| 12:01 |
: Dan is too! We can have a club.
|
| 12:02 |
: Are Evan Longoria and Kris Bryant the same person?
|
| 12:02 |
: Longoria and Bryant: well rounded third basemen, peaked early, face of franchise, similar stats when you compare age.
|
| 12:03 |
: Eh, I’m nto sure they’re hte same.
|
| 12:03 |
: Longoria had more glove
|
Let’s Pretend to Heal All of the Yankees
Last month, in more normal times, we tested the Yankees to see how injury-resistant the 2020 roster actually was in light of the then-recent news that Luis Severino would miss 2020 with Tommy John surgery. While this year’s Yankees roster wasn’t quite as deep as 2019’s, it took a lot of key injuries to seriously affect the team’s 2020 chances. But even as they remained the favorites to win the East, losing James Paxton until at least May, Aaron Judge‘s broken rib, and Giancarlo Stanton’s sore calf muscle increased the team’s downside risk.
ESPN’s Jeff Passan reported late Monday night that MLB and the MLBPA were discussing the particulars of a plan that would see workouts resume in May with the season beginning soon after. Passan is as dependable as they come, and I have little doubt about the story, but the chances of the season starting that quickly strike me as fairly small. As Ben Clemens wrote for FanGraphs earlier today, the logistical lift involved with such a plan is enormous. From what I’ve heard doing the rounds — and I’ve yet to have a colleague form a drastically different impression — MLB’s more realistic targets involve June workouts and a start sometime in early-to-mid July.
Obviously, teams would rather be playing right now, regardless of their roster’s injury status. Reality is terrible! But with reality’s timeline in mind, instead of injuring all of the Yankees, what if we healed them? It’s not quite as preposterous as it sounds thanks to the delayed start to the season. Severino wouldn’t return no matter how late Opening Day ends up being, so my headline is a bit of a cruel lie. But a midseason start to the 2020 season leaves a very real chance that the Yankees kick things off with Paxton, Judge, and Stanton all on the active roster; Stanton was likely to return in April, but the outlook for Paxton and Judge was a bit foggier. Read the rest of this entry »
Could a Shortened Season Resurrect the Four-Man Rotation?
As strange as it sounds right now, a day will come when baseball people start thinking about how to win baseball games again. That might not be until spring 2021, if COVID-19 forces Major League Baseball to sit out an entire calendar year. But there is still a chance it happens sometime in the next couple of months, and if that’s the case, teams will be preparing for a season unlike any they’ve played before. In addition to all of the structural changes that might be necessary for games to proceed, the simple fact of the season being considerably shorter than normal could change the way teams approach the games. In light of this, one strategy for teams to consider is a return to the four-man starting rotation.
Four-man rotations — or at least, the concept of throwing your best arms on three or fewer days rest — used to be fairly commonplace in the majors. In a piece by Russell A. Carleton at Baseball Prospectus from 2013, he found that around 40% of starts occurred on what we’d now call “short” rest as recently as the early 1970s. Soon after reaching that recent peak, however, the practice nosedived, with short rest starts happening less than 10% of the time by 1984 and continuing to free-fall until reaching a point of near-extinction over the last two decades.
The point of Carleton’s study was not to find out when the four-man rotation died out, but why it did. To that end, he came up with little statistical reasoning. Pitchers who threw on short rest did not seem to perform any worse than they’d be expected to on full rest, nor did any cumulative effects seem to wear them down faster over the course of a full season. This was true regardless of the time period, too, which means it didn’t seem to have anything to do with whether a pitcher was more or less conditioned for it. The best explanation for why teams broadly and swiftly shifted to a five-man rotation was simply fear of injuring arms, and hoping that more rest might prevent that.
Carleton’s piece didn’t take the extra step of actively calling for the four-man rotation to return, but plenty of others have. Major league teams, however, have been taking steps to limit the responsibilities given to starting pitchers, not expand them. In 2014, David Price led the majors with 248.1 innings pitched, while 34 pitchers reached 200 innings, and 65 reached 180. In 2019, Justin Verlander’s league-leading innings total was just 223, with 15 pitchers reaching 200 innings, and 33 pitchers reaching 180 innings. Over a full season, a four-man rotation could add as many as eight starts to a pitcher’s workload, amounting to 40-50 extra innings of work. It would be rather shocking to see a team take that kind of step over 162 games. Read the rest of this entry »
Top 53 Prospects: San Diego Padres
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the San Diego Padres. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacKenzie Gore | 21.1 | AA | LHP | 2021 | 70 |
| 2 | Luis Patiño | 20.5 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 60 |
| 3 | CJ Abrams | 19.5 | A | CF | 2023 | 55 |
| 4 | Luis Campusano | 21.5 | A+ | C | 2022 | 55 |
| 5 | Taylor Trammell | 22.5 | AA | LF | 2021 | 50 |
| 6 | Adrian Morejon | 21.1 | MLB | LHP | 2020 | 45+ |
| 7 | Hudson Head | 19.0 | R | CF | 2023 | 45 |
| 8 | Yeison Santana | 19.3 | R | SS | 2022 | 45 |
| 9 | Jake Cronenworth | 26.2 | AAA | SS/RHP | 2020 | 45 |
| 10 | Michel Baez | 24.2 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 45 |
| 11 | Hudson Potts | 21.4 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 45 |
| 12 | Joey Cantillo | 20.3 | A+ | LHP | 2022 | 45 |
| 13 | Blake Hunt | 21.4 | A | C | 2022 | 45 |
| 14 | Ryan Weathers | 20.4 | A | LHP | 2023 | 45 |
| 15 | Reginald Preciado | 16.9 | R | 3B | 2025 | 40+ |
| 16 | Gabriel Arias | 20.1 | A+ | SS | 2021 | 40+ |
| 17 | Anderson Espinoza | 22.1 | A | RHP | 2020 | 40+ |
| 18 | Andres Munoz | 21.2 | MLB | RHP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 19 | Tirso Ornelas | 20.1 | A+ | LF | 2021 | 40+ |
| 20 | Jeisson Rosario | 20.5 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 40+ |
| 21 | Tucupita Marcano | 20.6 | A | SS | 2021 | 40+ |
| 22 | Junior Perez | 18.8 | R | RF | 2022 | 40+ |
| 23 | Reggie Lawson | 22.7 | AA | RHP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 24 | Javier Guerra | 24.5 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 25 | Owen Miller | 23.4 | AA | SS | 2021 | 40 |
| 26 | Ismael Mena | 17.4 | R | CF | 2025 | 40 |
| 27 | Esteury Ruiz | 21.1 | A+ | 2B | 2021 | 40 |
| 28 | David Bednar | 25.5 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 29 | Edward Olivares | 24.1 | AA | CF | 2021 | 40 |
| 30 | Jorge Oña | 23.3 | AA | LF | 2021 | 40 |
| 31 | Ronald Bolaños | 23.6 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 32 | Pedro Avila | 23.2 | MLB | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 33 | Eguy Rosario | 20.6 | AA | 2B | 2021 | 40 |
| 34 | Jordy Barley | 20.4 | A- | SS | 2023 | 40 |
| 35 | Charlis Aquino | 18.4 | R | SS | 2024 | 40 |
| 36 | Joshua Mears | 19.1 | R | LF | 2024 | 40 |
| 37 | Dwanya Williams-Sutton | 22.7 | A | RF | 2022 | 40 |
| 38 | Carlos Guarate | 19.0 | A | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 39 | Gerardo Reyes | 26.9 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 40 | Steven Wilson | 25.6 | AAA | RHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 41 | Zayad Salinas | 17.2 | R | LHP/OF | 2025 | 35+ |
| 42 | Ignacio Feliz | 20.5 | A- | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 43 | Mason Fox | 23.3 | A+ | LHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 44 | Angel Solarte | 19.0 | A- | CF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 45 | Jesus Gonzalez | 18.8 | A | LHP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 46 | Cristian Heredia | 19.0 | R | CF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 47 | Edgar Martinez | 19.1 | R | RHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 48 | Mason Thompson | 22.1 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 49 | Evan Miller | 24.9 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 50 | Jason Vosler | 26.6 | AAA | 3B | 2020 | 35+ |
| 51 | Sean Guilbe | 20.3 | A- | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
| 52 | Michell Miliano | 20.3 | R | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 53 | Brayan Medina | 17.5 | R | RHP | 2025 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Crafty Arms Too Young To Drink
Efraín Contreras, RHP
Luarbert Arias, RHP
Miguel Rondon, RHP
Omar Cruz, LHP
Frank Lopez, RHP
Luis Gutierrez, LHP
Ramon Perez, LHP
Bodi Rascon, LHP
Gabriel Morales, LHP
Manny Guzman, LHP
If you’re thinking, “Gee, that’s a lot of guys in this one, very specific category,” that’s because this is the largest honorable mention subgroup I’ve ever put together. So many of the pitchers San Diego signed in the 2017 and 2018 classes are here, and they all typically have pretty average stuff except for a good changeup, with most of them having very impressive command for how young they are. Contreras has braces on in his 2019 roster photo but still posted a 4-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio in full-season ball at age 19 last year. He and Arias, also 19, are squat, projectionless, sit 90-92, have potential plus changeups, and throw a ton of strikes. Rondon, also 19, is the really athletic, skinnier, three-pitch version. He has one of the better breaking balls in the group. Cruz, 20, is the first name on this list who’s over 5-foot-11. He works glove side with tough angle on righties at 90-92, has a loopy curveball that has worked to this point, and has 135 strikeouts in 98 career innings largely because of his command. Frank Lopez was up to 96 as a 17-year-old but his velo has slowly dipped into the low-90s since then and he’s been hurt some. He too has a chance for a plus changeup. Luis Gutierrez is just 17; he was a 2019 July 2 signee. Like Cruz, he’s a lower slot lefty with a good breaking ball, but he needs to add velo. The lefties are all sinker-oriented.
Several Hitters to Monitor
Michael Gettys, CF
Agustin Ruiz, LF
Brandon Valenzuela, C
Jonny Homza, C/3B
Gettys’ tools are such that he might be Drew Stubbs, with plus power, a 70 arm and speed, but a hit tool that might not be playable in any capacity. Ruiz is well-built and has a bunch of average and slightly below tools that might grow enough for him to be something in the long haul. Valenzuela is similar, except at catcher. Homza is a tough-nosed backstop who can also play some infield and might end up with a 50 bat, which makes him an interesting 26th man candidate.
Relievers
Carlos Belen, RHP
Dauris Valdez, RHP
Jake Sims, RHP
Matt Brash, RHP
Belen (up to 98), Valdez (100), Sims (97), and Brash (95) all throw hard. Belen is a converted third baseman whose secondary stuff might yet improve since he’s only been pitching since 2018. Valdez is in Mauricio Cabrera-land for me because of the strike-throwing. Sims and Brash have vertical action breaking balls that could play in relief and their deliveries are deceptive in part because of their violence.
System Overview
There’s not much to say here that I haven’t already said at some point during the Padres rebuild, so I’ll quickly summarize. The Padres draft a lot of high school players, many of whom may have been under-scouted compared to prospects who have been on the radar since they were freshman or sophomores, with somewhat mixed results. They’ve also taken some bold, injury-related risks in the draft room (Cal Quantrill, Mason Thompson) and are apt to take underslot players they like and then spend more later in the draft.
Most of this system was signed out of Latin America, and the long-term members of the org are from two huge classes of $300,000 signees the Padres inked during their penalty box stretch after 2016. Most of these are the crafty pitchability arms in the Others of Note section, who are just so numerous that some of them will probably work out.
The prospect consolidation has begun as the team chases the Dodgers, which means players with ETAs in 2021 are the ones the club is more likely to trade to try to keep pressure off the 40-man if they can.
Effectively Wild Episode 1525: Hey All You Cool Sacks and Chickens

Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller banter about a possible banter shortage, a mysterious sack of flour from 1971, the kinds of baseball stories being published in the absence of baseball, the greatness (and eye-popping pitcher usage) of the 2001 World Series, the October travails of Charlie Leibrandt, and how MLB should approach planning for the start of the season, then answer listener emails about how to reward true talent in a shortened season, whether the Mendoza Line needs a new name, whether the White Sox are the most cursed team, and whether rules changes should be agreed to far in advance, plus a Stat Blast about the most lopsided WAR league leaders, a team of unlikely MVP vote-getters, and the odd diet of Ski Melillo.
Audio intro: I Was a King, "Bubble"
Audio outro: Pulp, "Help the Aged"
Link to Pedro’s sack of flour story
Link to Sam on the most meme-worthy moments
Link to Zach Kram on the Arizona plan
Link to Ben Clemens on the Arizona plan
Link to Stat Blast song covers thread
Link to order The MVP Machine
iTunes Feed (Please rate and review us!)
Sponsor Us on Patreon
Facebook Group
Effectively Wild Wiki
Twitter Account
Get Our Merch!
Email Us: podcast@fangraphs.com
Podcast (effectively-wild): Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
How Optimistic Are You that the Season Will Be Played? (Round 2)
Two weeks ago, I asked our readers a series of questions about what the season might look like as a means of showing our relative optimism (or pessimism) about the state of things in our country and in baseball. We are now a few more weeks down the line, so I’d like to see if your perceptions have changed. Feel free to answer the questions even if you did not participate in Round 1. The questions below mirror those asked two weeks ago. Thanks for your time. Read the rest of this entry »
COVID-19 Roundup: Green Shoots of Hope
This is the latest installment of a daily series in which the FanGraphs staff rounds up the latest developments regarding the COVID-19 virus’ effect on baseball.
IHME Projections Continue Positive Trend
The daily projections for COVID-19’s impact in the U.S. have continued to trend in a positive direction, whic is good news in a world currently starved for it. In its latest model run, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington again projects the peak stress on the American health system as less than in the previous day. From nearly 90,000 projected fatalities in the United States last week, the latest run knocks almost a third off that number.
There’s a lot of hardship and heartbreak still ahead of us, and all of this dependent on continued aggressive social distancing. But if the virus truly peaks on April 11 as projected, we could start to see more detailed road maps for the slow transition out of quarantine mode. It likely won’t happen as quickly as MLB’s ill-received plan to return as early as May would require, but this kind of planning will necessarily accelerate once we appear to be on the right side of the curve. For more on the challenges attendant with baseball’s reported Arizona Plan, check out Ben Clemens’ piece for FanGraphs from earlier today. Read the rest of this entry »
Dan Szymborski