Gregory Groundball vs. Marty McFly: Who Allows More Big Innings?

You’ve surely heard the sentiment: that pitcher is boom-or-bust. When he’s dialed in, he’s unhittable, but sometimes he just doesn’t “have it.” It’s a non-falsifiable claim, of course. It’s nearly impossible to say what constitutes having it or not, and harder still to know if it’s predictive. For the most part, your talent level is your talent level. Great pitcher? You’ll have fewer blowup games. Bad pitcher? Random chance is going to give you your fair share of crooked numbers.

This unprovable fact, however, set me onto an interesting train of thought. What if run clustering isn’t a purely random process? What if some pitchers, not through any innate streakiness but merely by virtue of the outcomes they allow, give up runs in interesting patterns? Take a groundball-heavy pitcher, for example. When a run scores against him, it’s almost certainly due to a series of groundball singles and walks. If one run scores, there’s often another runner in scoring position right away. The state of the world upon giving up one run, for this Zack Britton-wannabe pitcher, is such that he’s immediately threatened with more runs.

Contrast that to a different type of pitcher, a Nick Anderson-style strikeouts and dingers fly ball pitcher. When our punch-outs and fly balls pitcher gives up a run, it’s often on a solo shot. When that’s the case, one run is in, but the resulting situation isn’t threatening anymore. The bases are empty, the damage done in a single instant. Wouldn’t it be reasonable to wonder whether the two allow runs in different bunches?

Still, those are a lot of words with no real evidence behind them. Who’s to say which of those pitchers allow more big innings? Who’s to say if they’re even equally good pitchers? The guy who allows a lot of home runs sounds like he might allow a lot of big innings, just by virtue of being someone who allows a lot of home runs. We need to be more precise to say anything with conviction. Read the rest of this entry »


Leaderboards Update – Introducing Custom Date Range

We have added a custom date range to the main leaderboards. This allows you select any date range of three years or less after the start of 2002. Importantly, this will give you custom defined partial season WAR, which can’t be found elsewhere on the site.

The main controls for the custom date range can be found beneath the multiple seasons drop down menus. It uses the same date selector as the splits leaderboards, except it requires you to hit “Submit Custom Date” to load the leaderboard with the desired date range.

A custom date range is similar to options like “Last 30 Days” and “Past 3 Calendar Years” that are currently available on the leaderboards.

  • There is a new option, “Custom Date Range,” in the same “Split” menu.
  • A custom date range follows the same filtering restrictions, where you can’t filter by age, split seasons, or filter rookies.
  • You also cannot apply additional splits like handedness.

This is the present behavior of our time frame options. They might change in the future, but not in this update.

Important notes:

  • The leaderboard will only apply a date range when the split option is set to “Custom Date Range”
  • You can only select dates from 2002 to the present.
  • Date ranges can’t exceed three years. This restriction is due to data processing time.
  • Date ranges only work with the batting and pitching tabs, NOT the fielding tab.
  • Defensive value metrics, including the components of WAR, are prorated from the entire season, so you are unable to analyze defense within a specific date range.

If you encounter any issues, please let us know!


Effectively Wild Episode 1382: Pitchus Interruptus

EWFI
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller banter about a small way in which Willians Astudillo made the world better, baseball as a conversational icebreaker, Cody Bellinger’s incredible WAR pace, whether Bellinger is overshadowing the rest of the Dodgers (and Clay Bellinger), and a few of 2019’s other breakout batters, present a Stat Blast about Statcast no-hitters (and Statcast hitting streaks), then answer listener emails about whether playoff odds are fair to teams that appear out of the race and why we don’t see more pitchers pulled in the middle of plate appearances.

Audio intro: The Flying Burrito Brothers, "Cody, Cody"
Audio outro: Stephen Malkmus, "The Hook"

Link to Petriello on Bellinger’s possibly best-ever season
Link to Sam on Bellinger’s possibly best-ever season
Link to Sam on Statcast no-hitters
Link to MLB.com on Statcast hitting streaks
Link to Sam on alternate timelines
Link to Sam on season simulations
Link to Sam on season simulations again
Link to Sam on out-of-contention teams
Link to Nate on FiveThirtyEight forecast calibration
Link to FiveThirtyEight forecast calibration interactive tool
Link to Ben on matchup decisions
Link to article about Girardi pitching change
Link to 2015 podcast conversation about Girardi pitching change
Link to Foley’s book-signing event
Link to preorder The MVP Machine

 iTunes Feed (Please rate and review us!)
 Sponsor Us on Patreon
 Facebook Group
 Effectively Wild Wiki
 Twitter Account
 Get Our Merch!
 Email Us: podcast@fangraphs.com


Introduction to the 2019 Draft BOARD

The 2019 MLB Draft is upon us, and a few threads that help comprise the full, 40-round tapestry have piqued our interest. The individual players involved, and the pirate crew of scouts and analysts who shape their organizations’ futures are, of course, annual focal points of the process. If you’re interested in that sort of thing, then you’ll also want to check out our prospect resource, The BOARD, which has player rankings and reports for this year’s draft class. It will be updated continuously over the next few days. You’ll also want to refer back to the draft order, pick values, and bonus pool amounts, which can be found here. For the latest gossip, please enjoy our recent mock draft.

Rounds one and two of the draft begin Monday, June 3 at 7pm Eastern. Day 2 includes rounds three through ten and begins Tuesday at 1pm; the final thirty rounds begin Wednesday at noon.

As is the case every year, this draft has some deeper themes and details. Here we outline some of the things we find fascinating, or that individuals who play a role in this process (amateur scouting personnel and player reps) are talking about.

Strategy Trends

Forward Thinking Now Means Tools
During the Moneyball era, traditional, scout-centric teams took upside/tools, while progressive teams leaned on statistical performance and perceived safety. These days with showcase stats, TrackMan and other advanced tech, better understanding of biomechanics, draft models, and the rising cost of elite major league free agents, the progressive clubs now feel comfortable taking upside players just like the traditional teams did. Tools can be quantified to some degree (i.e. spin rates, velo, exit velo, etc.) and, especially when a progressive scouting org is also a progressive player development org, teams are confident they can shape those tools into performance even if the player in question hasn’t performed. It moves the group of players valued due to their performance — think big conference college players with strong peripherals — down the board board if they don’t have sufficient physical talent. The Dodgers and Yankees, who both also seem less inclined to care about pitcher injury, are two prominent examples of teams who operate this way. Read the rest of this entry »


Meet Yoko, Diablos Rojos del Mexico’s First Japanese Ballplayer

The journey that made Takaaki Yokoyama the first Japanase player with Diablos Rojos del Mexico in 79 years of franchise history was not a planned one.

Back in 2014, when he made his debut in Japan with the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles, his main goal was to make a living in Japanese baseball. In order to do it, he had a what might be called a typical repertoire for a Japanese pitcher — fastball, sinker, curveball, slider, and changeup. But he struggled with home run issues and below-average velocity on his heater (138.9 kmh or 86.3 mph). He tried to improve his offspeed stuff after a rough couple of years, moving from a classic changeup to a splitter. That bumped up his velocity on offspeed pitchs almost 4 mph but did nothing to correct his main problem in NPB: his fastball was getting destroyed. According to Deltagraphs, his four-seam fastball had a -10.6 run value in less than 20 innings pitched in 2016. Two years later, he was released.

Luckily for Yokoyama, that wasn’t the end of the road. The 28-year-old right-hander teamed up with a group of international players to showcase themselves in several spring games organized by Yokoyama’s agent and translator, Toma Irokawa, in an effort to offer their services to American teams.

The plan worked for him. He signed with the New Jersey Jackals in the CanAm league and was about to get his first shot at independent baseball until things hit a snag.

“He had everything set up but problems with the immigration process delayed us. In the middle of that process, we got the call from Diablos Rojos,” remembers Toma.

Word of Yokoyama and the showcase had spread, and a team in need of bullpen help was about to get it in the form of its first Japanese pitcher. Read the rest of this entry »


Pre-Draft Farm System Rankings

With the team prospect lists wrapping up today, multiple top 100 types having recently graduated, and the draft coming early next week, it’s a natural time to take a snapshot of where things stand in terms of the game’s farm system rankings.

We’ve taken Craig Edwards’ values for prospects by tier and totaled up what each of the 30 clubs had in their farm system over the winter. We also have a “Now” ranking with graduated prospects taken out (see the sidebar here for a full list of graduates), as well as a post-draft number based on our valuations of what teams’ draft picks are worth (in other words, our expectation of what we expect them to sign). Orgs are ranked based on the “Now” ranking; the total number of prospects and average per prospect value are also from that “Now” figure.

Offseason, Now, Post-Draft Meta Values, in Millions
# Team Offseason Graduated Now Count $/Player Post Draft Pick Value
1 Padres $504 $34 $470 54 $8.7 $524 $54
2 Rays $471 $28 $443 53 $8.4 $492 $49
3 Braves $354 $55 $299 27 $11.1 $352 $53
4 White Sox $278 $0 $278 30 $9.3 $336 $59
5 Astros $295 $22 $273 38 $7.2 $303 $30
6 Reds $263 $0 $263 29 $9.1 $311 $48
7 Twins $250 $4 $246 43 $5.7 $291 $45
8 Blue Jays $280 $38 $242 30 $8.1 $282 $41
9 Dodgers $262 $28 $234 34 $6.9 $274 $40
10 Pirates $226 $2 $224 35 $6.4 $270 $47
11 Angels $219 $0 $219 31 $7.1 $256 $37
12 D’Backs $201 $0 $201 32 $6.3 $272 $71
13 Indians $199 $0 $199 30 $6.6 $230 $32
14 Marlins $206 $23 $183 32 $5.7 $247 $64
15 Mariners $196 $21 $175 24 $7.3 $213 $38
16 A’s $169 $0 $169 30 $5.6 $200 $31
17 Brewers $167 $0 $167 34 $4.9 $194 $27
18 Rangers $158 $1 $157 37 $4.2 $209 $53
19 Tigers $163 $7 $156 24 $6.5 $209 $53
20 Phillies $151 $0 $151 34 $4.4 $183 $32
21 Cubs $143 $0 $143 31 $4.6 $174 $31
22 Orioles $135 $0 $135 32 $4.2 $217 $82
23 Mets $155 $28 $127 23 $5.5 $166 $39
24 Rockies $151 $28 $123 26 $4.7 $160 $37
25 Yankees $123 $0 $123 38 $3.2 $161 $38
26 Cardinals $156 $39 $117 35 $3.3 $151 $35
27 Giants $112 $0 $112 29 $3.8 $154 $42
28 Nationals $172 $62 $110 21 $5.2 $140 $31
29 Royals $74 $0 $74 27 $2.7 $140 $66
30 Red Sox $56 $6 $50 25 $2.0 $78 $28
Totals: $6,279 $426 $5,854 968 $6.0 $7,187 $1,334
Averages: $209 $14 $195 32 $240 $44

The previous version of this org ranking from the end of the 2018 season can be found here. Below is the grid with the breakdown of prospects by FV and club, so you can see the shape of a system:

Team FV Breakdown Grid
# Team Value Count 70 65 60 55 50 45+ 45 40+ 40 35+
1 Padres $470 54 1 3 8 4 3 5 20 10
2 Rays $443 53 1 1 2 5 2 9 5 20 8
3 Braves $299 27 4 4 1 3 2 10 3
4 White Sox $278 30 1 3 2 5 2 10 7
5 Astros $273 38 1 1 4 4 7 8 13
6 Reds $263 29 2 4 1 2 2 13 5
7 Twins $246 43 1 1 2 1 3 4 26 5
8 Blue Jays $242 30 1 1 1 1 4 13 9
9 Dodgers $234 34 1 2 1 2 3 5 13 7
10 Pirates $224 35 2 3 4 3 16 7
11 Angels $219 31 1 4 1 5 4 10 6
12 D’Backs $201 32 1 4 1 2 4 12 8
13 Indians $199 30 5 1 6 3 10 5
14 Marlins $183 32 1 2 2 5 2 13 7
15 Mariners $175 24 5 2 1 4 9 3
16 A’s $169 30 3 3 3 14 7
17 Brewers $167 34 1 2 3 1 21 6
18 Rangers $157 37 3 1 6 7 13 7
19 Tigers $156 24 1 3 1 3 1 12 3
20 Phillies $151 34 1 2 2 4 2 10 13
21 Cubs $143 31 3 1 4 2 21
22 Orioles $135 32 3 6 2 13 8
23 Mets $127 23 3 1 2 3 10 4
24 Rockies $123 26 1 1 4 5 11 4
25 Yankees $123 38 1 3 7 3 19 5
26 Cardinals $117 35 2 1 3 26 3
27 Giants $112 29 1 2 2 6 11 7
28 Nationals $110 21 1 1 1 1 8 9
29 Royals $74 27 3 5 3 9 7
30 Red Sox $50 25 2 5 14 4

There is some wiggle room in the team rankings, as you could argue that a team with a couple million dollars less in value, but with that value concentrated in many fewer prospects, actually has more trade value. As a thought exercise, you’d want a $100 million prospect more than 100 $1 million prospects, which this ranking would technically call equal. Exactly where that cutoff lies and what the discount rate would be for a multi-player package isn’t clear just yet. Would you need $120 million of value in two prospects to part with one $100 million prospect? How much would you need for a three player package? These are questions we plan on answering down the road.

There will be an update moving the FV of dozens of prospects right after the draft, and draftees who haven’t yet signed but who we expect to sign (essentially all top 10 round picks) will also be added right away. With that in mind, because THE BOARD will change in a significant way right after the draft, we wanted to capture how things looked both during the winter and in this pre-draft, pre-trade deadline moment. At some point soon after the draft concludes, we’ll have dynamic farm rankings on THE BOARD that will update whenever we change a pro prospect’s FV, which will happen frequently after this first update goes live.


Craig Edwards FanGraphs Chat – 5/30/2019

Read the rest of this entry »


Derek Dietrich Winds ‘Em Up and Lets It Fly

“You have to be good to be a hot dog,” said Pirates play-by-play broadcaster Greg Brown during Tuesday night’s Reds-Pirates contest, quoting Dock Ellis to conclude an anecdote about the May 1, 1974 start in which the Pirates’ free-spirited righty intentionally drilled the first three Reds he faced. In illustrating the long and oft-heated rivalry between the two teams, Brown appeared to arrive at an epiphany regarding the home run celebrations of Derek Dietrich — a subject of unhealthy fixation that had dominated an often cringeworthy broadcast while clumsily recapitulating the game’s generational culture war. The 29-year-old utiltyman had just clubbed his third dinger of the game, fourth of this week’s series, seventh in eight games against the Pirates, and 17th overall, the last a career high and a total tied for fifth in the majors.

Dietrich, who spent six years toiling for the Marlins before being designated for assignment and released last November (stellar personnel management there, Jeets), isn’t a player over whom opponents generally obsess. Beyond being a bat-first type whose defensive versatility depends upon certain levels of tolerance, he’s earned a reputation as something of a cut-up. In the minors, as a member of the Double-A Jacksonville Suns in 2013, he put on a display of his juggling skill that progressed to as many as five balls, then to bowling pins, literal machetes, and flaming torches:

Read the rest of this entry »


Jay Jaffe FanGraphs Chat – 5/30/19

12:01
Avatar Jay Jaffe: Good afternoon and welcome to another edition of my Thursday chat. I’m in a spicy mood today thanks in part to having spent several hours listening and transcribing Tuesday evening’s cringeworthy Pirates broadcast while Derek Dietrich hit three home runs  (article forthcoming). That and the leftovers from dinner at Han Dynasty which will constitute today’s lunch. Anyway, on with the show…

12:01
fan of graphs: hypothetically, if the padres were to shut down chris paddack. what functionally happens? does he remain on the 25 man roster and just doesn’t pitch? does he get put on an inactive list? sent down?

12:04
Avatar Jay Jaffe: It would depend upon the date. Assuming the Padres wait until September, they would have the roster space just to let him be. Otherwise, they could option him (which would have service time ramifications and be kind of a dick move) or place him on the IL with, say, shoulder fatigue,

12:05
Birch: Any thoughts on Bridich’s comments about beat writers?

12:05
Avatar Jay Jaffe: Travis Sawchik and Dan Symborski saved us the trouble

Rockies GM Jeff Bridich on beat writers via @psaundersdp

Plus, check out GM Jeff Bridich’s shot at MLB beat writers. twitter.com/dpostsports/st…

. Also, Bridich’s free agent signing history via @DSzymborski

30 May 2019
12:07
Avatar Jay Jaffe:

Jeff Bridich’s MLB contract signings in free agency have been almost unfathomably incompetent. They make Battlefield: Earth and Pluto Nash look like investment triumphs by comparison.
30 May 2019

Read the rest of this entry »


How Anthony Rizzo is Beating the Shift

Even though he’s just 29 years old, the last few seasons of Anthony Rizzo’s career have looked a lot like a player in decline. At its most basic, Rizzo’s offensive production looked like this:

He hit for a 155 wRC+ back in 2014, dropped 10 points, held steady for a season, dropped 10 points, and then dropped 10 points again. The simplest of graphs doesn’t always tell the story, though, and so far this season, Rizzo is hitting as well as he’s ever has. In a less simplistic view, here’s Rizzo’s 50-game rolling wRC+ since 2014. Every point represented below shows roughly one-third of a season to help eliminate a slump over a few weeks or some fluky results:

Even here, we seem to see a long slow creep downward, with the highs not quite as high and the lows a bit lower. Where the difference is compared to the yearly numbers is in the 2018 movement. There is a huge valley to start the season with a massive peak higher than anything Rizzo has done since 2015. The two evened out and resulted in a somewhat disappointing year before we get to a small valley to start this season with another good peak, both of which look similar to Rizzo’s profile prior to 2018. When we break out some of Rizzo’s numbers, consistency appears more prevalent than a decline. Read the rest of this entry »