2019 Was a Rocky Mountain Low for Colorado

Nolan Arenado had another terrific season, but as in years past, the Rockies did little to supplement their star core. (Photo: Joey S)

“If you don’t know where you’re going, you might not get there.” – Yogi Berra

In 2017 and ’18, for the first time in franchise history, the Colorado Rockies made the playoffs in consecutive seasons. The team didn’t play deep into October in either season, but for an organization that hadn’t even had back-to-back winning seasons since the mid-90s, it was a wonderful result. Problem is, the team gave little thought as to how they got there or the weaknesses that could prevent them from doing so again in the future. The strengths Colorado rode in 2017 and 2018 were absent in 2019, and left the team high-and-dry with no real Plan B.

The Setup

The Rockies clearly believed that 2019 would be another year of contendership. But I’m not sure they realized how dependent they had been on the production of a few stars every season. 91 wins are nothing to scoff at, but to get to the point of barely making the playoffs, the Rockies had to have two legitimate MVP contenders and two legitimate Cy Young candidates. All told, Colorado received 19 WAR from their top four players in 2018, an identical sum as in 2017. In both years, that figure represented more than half the team’s value, a ratio far worse than every other postseason team from 2017, 2018, and now 2019.

In 2017, the Rockies made the playoffs despite an offense that ranked 26th in the league in wRC+. To fix this lack of run-scoring — the team ranked third in baseball in runs scored, but a good offense in Colorado should be crushing the league in runs, even given the most generous application of the Coors Field Hangover — the Rockies did, well, not much. They signed a 35-year-old catcher and given the opportunity to upgrade from fading veteran Carlos González, he of an 85 wRC+ and 0 WAR, decided to upgrade to…Carlos González.

The one place the Rockies actually did seek to seriously improve after 2017 was in the bullpen. Despite still having a league-average bullpen in 2017 even with the WARtributions of Jake McGee and Greg Holland removed, this was where the Rockies chose to use all of their offseason cash. Out the door went $106 million, and in the door came a returning McGee, Wade Davis, and Bryan Shaw. This trio combined for 0.2 WAR in 2018. Meanwhile, the two main bullpen contributors were guys they already had, Adam Ottavino and Scott Oberg. While the Rockies simply threw money at the most prominent, name-brand relievers who would come to Colorado, Ottavino spent the offseason becoming a better pitcher on his own.

Despite this lack of planning by the team, Cy Young runs by German Márquez and Kyle Freeland and MVPish seasons by Nolan Arenado and Trevor Story made it possible for the Rockies to coast their way back to the playoffs in 2018.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

But given a second opportunity to address the team’s very serious flaws, the Rockies didn’t do much of anything after 2018. The team banked on a bounce back season from Daniel Murphy, who spent much of 2018 injured, to fill the void at first base. That void, more commonly known as Ian Desmond, was shifted to create a new void in center field, guaranteeing that the Rockies would receive no benefit from the realization that Charlie Blackmon is better suited for a corner outfield spot.

And that was it. Colorado’s second-biggest signing was Mark Reynolds, a player whose most recent one-WAR season was 2014. The team didn’t make a significant trade until late March when they sent Mike Tauchman to the Yankees. I fussed a lot about this move at the time, not because I thought Tauchman might be a superstar, but because two consecutive .900 OPS seasons, even in the Pacific Coast League, should have merited a longer look than the six starts the Rockies gave him in 2018. When you run a baseball team-slash-jobs-program-for-sub-replacement-veterans, I guess sacrifices have to be made occasionally.

Would the Homer Simpson-esque plan for the Rockies work out in 2019? Let’s find out!

The Projection

The projections did not herald doom-and-gloom for the Rockies. ZiPS projected Colorado to drop slightly below .500, forecasting a 79-83 record for the team and a 9.0% chance at making the playoffs. One thing unseen in the base projections was that the Rockies’ projections had a very unusual distribution. Sure, their 50th-percentile projection was two games worse than the Padres and two better than the Diamondbacks, but ZiPS projected a significantly lower floor and lower ceiling for the team. The Padres projected to have a much better shot at 95 wins than Colorado (5.0% vs. 0.8%) did, while the Diamondbacks much longer odds of finishing under 70 wins than the Rockies (7.2% vs. 14.1%).

Having superstars is great, but surrounding them with nothing simply cancels out their value. The Rockies projected as nearly a .500 team, but thanks to having few possible sources of additional upside outside of the team’s stars, they also projected as an incredibly fragile one.

The Results

As the second team eliminated from the playoffs in the National League and the first realistic preseason contender to get the axe, it’s not a stretch to say Colorado ended up with one of their downside scenarios. The team kept their heads above water for much of the season, sporting a .500 record as late as July 15. They started their slide by allowing 40 runs while getting swept in four games at the hands of the San Francisco Giants. Since then, the Rockies have gone 22-43, dooming any long-shot playoff run by the trade deadline.

As they often have, the Rockies maintained their .500 status largely by relying on the team’s stars. Through July 14, the Rockies had three hitters with a .900 OPS (Blackmon, Arenado, Story) and a fourth, David Dahl, who was near that mark and the healthiest he’d been in years. One of 2018’s heroes, Kyle Freeland, lost the plot in 2019, but Jon Gray took up his mantle and combined with Marquez to be worth 5.2 WAR and post a FIP on the sunny side of four.

The team’s starting pitching was one of its strengths when making its playoff runs, with the 2018 squad peeking into the top tier in WAR in ninth place. Through the team’s high-water mark in mid-July, the rotation ranked 17th in baseball in WAR. If they had repeated 2018’s success, those four extra wins would have been enough to make them a 50-42 team, one that would have been a serious contender, perhaps enough of one to have inspired them to actually take an aggressive approach and add a Marcus Stroman or Trevor Bauer at the deadline, a needed change from the previous two lackadaisical trade seasons.

The lineup, even with the stars at the top, were unable to compensate for the starting pitching dropping back to average and certainly were unable to do so when the rotation combined for a 6.12 ERA and -1.0 WAR, as they have since July 14. The offense has actually improved in the second half, or at least been less woefully inadequate, putting up a wRC+ of 89 after a first-half wRC+ of 85.

At the trade deadline, the Rockies showed little indication that a change in direction was forthcoming. The team’s biggest move in the summer months was signing Yonder Alonso, who had been released by the White Sox, thus heading off the dangerous possibility that the Rockies might do something interesting with those at-bats. The team didn’t make any moves to start equipping itself for next season, as the Reds did when they traded for Bauer. Nor have they used their fall from contention as an opportunity to take an extended look at any of their more interesting fringe prospects; Roberto Ramos did not get a spot on the 40-man roster and Dom Nuñez has been out-started by hot, young prospect Drew Butera.

What Comes Next?

It’s difficult to have much faith in this organization; in any front-office ranking, I can’t see a way to get them out of the bottom five. The team is exceptionally loyal to their employees, and while that’s a laudable approach in most cases, in this one it’s keeping Colorado entrenched as a passive, moderately backwards franchise. The team’s general manager, Jeff Bridich, is the team’s general manager not because the organization went on a worldwide search for the best candidates, but because he was next in line when Dan O’Dowd and Bill Geivett resigned in 2014.

Now, like Bridich, I’m not a brain surgeon, but when I see the Rockies, I see a team that occasionally has strengths — at this moment, the minor league players developed in the last five years, and finding starting pitchers that can succeed in Coors — but lacks the will to build a team around those strengths or make hard decisions. It’s easy to hang onto your veterans past their expiration dates and get nothing for Justin Morneau or Michael Cuddyer or Carlos Gonzalez. It’s easy to continue to start a player having his third-consecutive sub-replacement season simply because you’re paying him $70 million. It’s easy to not go after a Bryce Harper in free agency. It’s easy to not make a splash at the trade deadline.

I don’t necessarily think the Rockies are at the point where they need to light the torches, burn down the roster, and start again. But I do think they need a clean sweep of the front office as is being done in Baltimore. The Rockies have a lot going for them: players to build around in Arenado, Story, and Marquez, a beautiful park in a beautiful area, little in the way of regional baseball competition, and a fanbase that has supported winners in the past. It would be nice if they had an organization that could truly take advantage of those strengths. Given the talent they’ve developed, there’s no reason the Rockies couldn’t have been Astros: Mountain Edition by now.

The Absitively, Posilutely, Way-Too-Early ZiPS Projection – Jon Gray

The Rockies did best the Astros in one way: their choice of pitcher in the first round of the 2013 draft. Of the top seven pitchers taken in the first round that year (Mark Appel, Gray, Kohl Stewart, Trey Ball, Phil Bickford, Braden Shipley, and Chris Anderson), Gray has turned out to be the only impact talent. Gray’s FIP problems in 2018 (a 5.12 ERA vs. a 4.08 FIP) didn’t persist in 2019, and he had a legitimately excellent season, going 11-8, with a 3.84 ERA, a 4.07 FIP, and 2.9 WAR, before suffering a stress fracture in his left foot. This injury isn’t expected to be a problem in 2020, and with Freeland turning into a home run machine, the team’s success will almost require a 1-2 of Marquez and Gray.

ZiPS Projection – Jon Gray
Year W L ERA IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2020 11 9 3.59 165.7 155 66 16 52 171 116 3.1
2021 11 8 3.54 160.3 147 63 16 50 167 117 3.1
2022 11 8 3.62 154.0 142 62 15 48 160 114 2.8




Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cave Dameron
7 years ago

Next year, Rock Mountain High.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago

I think I totally disagree with the notion that the Rockies could have been Astros Mountain edition… And it’s entirely due to the pitching. That’s a thing that continues to haunt Colorado- and probably always will. This decade everyone in mlb has an ERA between 3.50 and 4.51. Except the Rockies at 4.75. At home- everyone is between 3.15(LAD) and 4.49(Tex). Except the Rockies at 5.13. And the 2nd worse NL team is at 4.21(Arizona). So when you’re giving up an extra run every 9 innings- that hurts.

On the road they’re a pretty normal pitching staff- #18 by ERA. Just behind Houston actually.

But it’s the total wear and tear that kills the Rockies. 1st half of seasons this decade their team ERA is 4.68 2nd half it’s 4.83….

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Bro, we gotta have a talk about park factors…

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

No I get the park factors totally. But what that doesn’t take into account is the fact that Colorado is throwing at home way more pitches than other teams do at home. They have faced this decade at home 32,252 batters. The next worse NL team is at 31,610 or 652 batters. Assuming say 4 pitches per batter and they’ve thrown over 2600 more pitches than next worst team. And that’s just for #14. Their overall team ERA is worse by 0.15 in 2nd half than it is 1st half. I looked and the MLB ERA gets worse by 0.02 in 2nd half vs 1st half this decade(4.07 vs 4.09).

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

The real problem is that they don’t try to sign or trade for the kinds of fly-ball hitters that would be likely to be greatly helped by playing in Coors: Encarnacion, Vogelbach, Odor, Moustakas, etc.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I get that- but signing guys to play in Coors is great- but you play half your games away. How are you going to be away from home batting? Also, some of those guys fielding in Coors?

jfree
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

I agree with this. But it doesn’t seem that the Rockies do. Any freeswinging hacker can get better results at Coors. The problem is – those same freeswinging hackers will just be more likely to bomb out on the road and a lineup full of them will produce the sort of offensive streakiness that can dig deep holes for the team.

So why is it that from 2012-2019, the Rockies lead the league in exactly that sort of freeswinginess – 5th highest Oswing%, 5th highest Zswing%, highest Swing% – which can obviously lead to good batted-ball outcomes but will also lead to – eg 10th highest K% (and remember Coors hugely depresses K’s) and 5th lowest BB%.

It was the guys like Helton, Fowler, Iannetta, Atkins, Hawpe, Spilborghs whose ‘zagging’ role – combo of working the pitcher harder during their PA and not getting into bad counts – in the lineup was so valuable in offsetting the tendency for the rest of the lineup to ‘zig’.

jfree
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

At home- everyone is between 3.15(LAD) and 4.49(Tex). Except the Rockies at 5.13.

You kind of miss the point. At home, COL is only playing against opponents who are also playing at Coors. So you gotta compare COL home v everyone else at Coors. The Rockies pitching challenge at Coors is not outrunning the tiger but merely outrunning the other team.

I’ve been beating the drum for years about Rockies doing more to platoon their pitching a bit more into a home v road split. Simply as a way to concentrate road IP for those pitchers who can’t pitch at Coors without letting it get into their head and concentrate Coors IP at Coors for those pitchers who are OK pitching there (esp in exchange for a nice long contract and being lauded as the team’s ‘secret sauce’) and eliminate the real problem they have in attracting ‘normal’ already-developed-by-others pitchers to their team. None of which is easy but nor is it particularly difficult with a moderately talented FO.

There may be something to your point about ‘wearing down’ – but it ain’t about just pitching. Altitude has a big impact on mundane stuff – like sleeping. If your blood cells are not acclimated to altitude (which takes a couple months but has to be continuous months and so can only occur by living at altitude during the offseason), then sleeping is more fitful. And if your sleeping is fitful, then your body doesn’t repair itself as well over the course of a long season. I do know Broncos and Nuggets and every Olympic sport that involves aerobic exertion understands this – to get the advantages of altitude you gotta get your body acclimated to altitude. I’m not sure the Rockies do understand this cuz baseball itself isn’t aerobic.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  jfree

The problem is while other teams come in for 2-4 days, and get limited long term impacts, the Rockies have 81 of those days. The impact builds up.

You can’t have a home pitching staff and a road pitching staff. Teams will have regularly periods where you are away from home for 9 days or more. same the other way.

looked at batting- and for the Rockies this decade- home wRC+- 1st half 97, 2nd half 102.

jfree
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

In fact you CAN split roster into mostly-home v mostly-road v mixed staff. You just can’t do it if you’re copying every other team with an anal-retentive 5-man rotation schedule and a bullpen full of 1IP max guys. Rather you have to fit your rotation schedule more to your home/away schedule and the bullpen has to have have multi-inning guys who can eat 100+ IP’s/yr.

In most years, 2 home and 2 road starters can be scheduled roughly 80%+ at their ‘preferred’ location with only a +/- one day difference in their days-between-starts. 2 others (prob younger or back-of-rotation) or ‘bullpen days’ would then do the mid-trip fill-in games.

For bullpen, the ‘problem to be solved’ is a lot of needed IP/year. Sure enough – from 2012-2019, Rockies have the 2nd most IP from their relievers. Unsolvable if you’ve stuffed your bullpen with 1 IP guys (technically Rockies ranked #19 in IP/RP appearance at 1.025 but I say there’s no diff between 1.025 and 1.000). Failure to solve that problem is why Rockies ‘burn out their bullpen’ – most ‘game appearances’ by RP during that timespan and who knows how much more warm-up-sit-down stuff. That problem gets solved with multi-inning relievers who can appear idk 45/year but w 100+ IP/yr each. And that means either fewer roster slots for bullpen or an expectation of many many more IP/yr from the bullpen.

And it ain’t RC+ that would show the wear-down. Summer heat is a 2nd half thang. Injury-time or days-off would be the better measure.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  jfree

but not sure how the Rockies could do the home/away…

look at their schedule after all star break as an example-
Fri 7/12-Wed 7/17 home
Fri 7/19-Sun 7/28 away
Mon 7/29-Sun 8/4 home
Tue 8/6-Sun 8/11 away

So a guy is going to be able to go from 7/17 to 7/29 w/o pitching?
(and they had another stretch home similar to that).

jfree
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Well stop trying to obsess about a 100% solution. That’s anal retentive. This is a Pareto optimization thang. If those weeks are part of the 20% remainder, so be it. I’m sure as hell not going to schedule Rockies rotation online unless Rockies pay me – but let me assure you, that’s easy stuff.

More difficult – but still very very doable – is getting players to buy in to a more flexible between-starts routine and getting the training/medical info re what is doable/wise in order to routinize it. OTOH – CO is the center of the universe when it comes to sports training/medicine. That itself should be a permanent competitive advantage for the Rockies. But copying what every other team does is no way to make that a competitive advantage.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

In addition to all the other issues raised here by CC AFC and jfree, I don’t know how useful the “declining ERA” stat is (should be ERA- anyway) unless we also know what the trendline is for other teams too.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

for MLB ERA only goes up from 4.07 to 4.09 thru the season. So for the Rockies to go up from 4.68 to 4.83 is quite a bit more than usual.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

What’s the spread though? How much variation is there?

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

looking just at division:
LA 3.50-3.49
SF 3.85-3.73
SD 3.98-4.11
Ari 4.17-4.13
Col 4.68-4.83

So 2 of the 5 drop by at least 0.04. LA is a wash. Kind of interesting that San Diego and Colorado have the 2 biggest jumps- given their parks.

DDD
7 years ago

It’s the “Rocky Mountain Way.” “Think It’s Safe To Say, Time To Open Fire?” 😉

mike sixelMember since 2016
7 years ago

Just adding some average, not expensive, hitters would make a world of difference. That part shouldn’t be that hard…. Their failure is kind of astounding, in free agency. So backward.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago

The Ian Desmond Contract succeeded in effectively blocking not one but two (McMahon, Tauchman) players, and costing them LeMahieu in the process.

I’m imagining how much better this team would have been these past two years with a developing McMahon at 1B, Tauchman roaming CF, and DJ still entrenched at 2B.

“Much” is the answer that keeps coming to mind.

JupiterBrandoMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

The Desmond contract is the dumbest in baseball. Just baffling.

mikecws91Member since 2022
7 years ago

“It’s difficult to have much faith in this organization; in any front-office ranking, I can’t see a way to get them out of the bottom five. The team is exceptionally loyal to their employees, and while that’s a laudable approach in most cases, in this one it’s keeping Colorado entrenched as a passive, moderately backwards franchise.”

Hey, the White Sox elegy was last week!

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  mikecws91

At least the White Sox have upside and a winnable division!

tpaddor
7 years ago

As a huge Rockies fan, the truth of this is saddening. We have no idea what we’re doing and Jeff Bridich’s hubris has been the downfall of this team. Nobody could have seen the pitching staff imploding on itself but Bridich keeps pressing the same button with the offense hoping for a different result.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  tpaddor

Bridich comes off as exceedingly arrogant, especially in the face of several obvious missteps that everyone labeled as such as soon as they happened.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

the problem is, the ownership is TERRIBLE, and basically doesn’t move on from poor decision makers. They make the Bowlens look good, and Pat was brain dead for about a decade (they used to whoosh him up to a suite at Mile High that was completely enclosed- no one could interact with him).

by the way, dealing with their stadium ops people is about the worst experience I’ve ever had with a group. We want to give you a ton of money! Why do you make our lives so hard? I’ve done similar firm events at places all over the country, and have had other sports as clients, and never experienced anything quite as incompetent as the Rockies.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

I more or less agree with everything written here, except that I think it’s worth pointing out that the thing the Rockies are easily the worst at–free agent signings and extensions–is also the issue that is the most visible (Desmond, Blackmon, all those relievers, etc.). The pitching development program deserves an enormous thumbs up, because it’s hard to develop pitchers that will do well in Colorado and elsewhere. If you had someone who was savvy at free agent signings/extensions instead of Brdich I bet you’d be in good shape. And yes, there are teams that do this very well, like the Brewers, Yankees, and Twins, so you can do a lot better in those departments.

Lou BrownMember since 2017
7 years ago

I really think the CO front office looks at the runs scored across the league and thinks their offense is good.

adohaj
7 years ago

Hot young prospect drew butera?

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  adohaj

Sarcasm. The Rockies have several basically useless veterans taking PAs away from young players who have at least an outside chance of contributing going forward.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago

The sentence that caught my eye was the fact that only one of the seven pitchers taken in the 1st round in 2013 ever amounted to anything, and Jon Gray, while decent, has actually been much less than he was touted to be. Is scouting and player evaluation really this poor or is it player development?

phealy48
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

It’s likely just randomness. In a good year, maybe 3 of the 7 become decent MLB regulars. 1 out of 7 is almost definitely just random. It’s hard to project what 18-22 year olds will be in 3-7 years in any profession.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  phealy48

I don’t know about that. As a PGA professional for over 50 years I had a pretty good idea that Phil, Tiger, Jordan Spieth, Rory McElroy and others were going to be superstars before they were 15.

jfree
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Man v course is a bit different than man v other man

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Prospects bust. A lot. Especially pitching prospects.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago

I wonder if any team can really have a plan B. When the high priced acquisitions fall flat on their keisters there isn’t much a team can do. The Rockies tried to do what is currently in vogue and build a stocked bullpen. When that stock turned into Davis, McGee and Shaw at exorbitant prices then they are doomed. Other things factor in but the complete failure of their expensive bullpen trio is paramount.

Sarachim
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

I don’t think “blow your entire FA budget on relievers” has ever been in vogue, really. Part of the reason that loaded bullpens became common is that they’re relatively easy to develop internally.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Sarachim

You must mean Chapman, Ottovino, Britton, Kahnle, Green and Cessa none of whom was first signed by the Yankees.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

They wound up in a bidding war against themselves for pretty much all of those guys, though, when they already had in-house talent (Ottavino, Oberg) who were at least on-par, and guys in the minors (Estevez, Diaz) who had shown signs of being effective to one degree or another.

JohnnyRingoFWC
7 years ago

I think they would thrive if they could get guys at every position who can hit bombs, even guys with lower averages maybe. The lineup often looks underwhelming as a whole considering the park. As for pitching, who is going to come there if not traded or developed? Seems like a team that has to swat to make it, but I could be very wrong.

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  JohnnyRingoFWC

That’s exactly the thinking of the Rockies when they were a new franchise. But the bad defense homerun hitters just made them unwatchable for half an inning every night and ruined Poor Mike Hampton’s career. They ran away leading the league in runs scored every year but had team eras nearing 7. ‘Twas awful

CL1NTMember since 2025
7 years ago

The Daniel Murphy signing was a good one and everyone was rightfully excited about it, but for whatever reason, Murphy just didn’t produce like he should’ve with them (especially being in that park!). He literally had the worst season on his career, WAR-wise. So I don’t blame the Rockies for that one.

But the way that org continues to do basically nothing must be excruciating for that fanbase. This past winter, the Rockies looked like just a few pieces away from really challenging the Dodgers this season… but they completely dropped the ball, again, by doing mostly nothing.

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago

Rocky Mountain High High in Colorado. Rocky Mountain high high in Colorado. I guess John Denver could predict the future.
Once upon a time, Ian Desmond was an excellent defensive SS with power and speed. Perhaps they should just play him at his natural position….. I’m just kidding. Rocky Mountain high high Colorado….

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago

Actually in all seriousness i’ve often wondered if the Rockies shouldn’t experiment with home and away squads. The Stars play everyday. The rest are either home or away regulars and bench/ph/Dh in the other games. This could reduce the post Coors hangover.

Dooduh
7 years ago

I’m wondering how any Rockies 2019 elegy could somehow exclude the fact that they allowed 3 players to move to the Yankees for whom they generated >9 wins and got nothing in return for them. And the Yanks paid something like just $20M for that windfall of productivity.

reputationadvisor
7 years ago

Good piece. The Rockies unfortunately have too many places in the lineup and pitching staff where professionalism and hard work are evident yet sufficient results are not. Injuries played a role too. The front office has good intentions yet there are many impediments to lasting success and next level performance and results. The farm system too is not what it needs to be. It has produced quality and has more talent still in the feeder system yet there are a lot of holes thanks to drafting errors, injuries and underachievement.

Sittch
7 years ago

The best way to win at Coors is to have a pitching staff that prevents walks, a patient lineup that draws walks, and a solid defense.

The hits will fall for both teams, but limiting base runners is especially important.

Kevbot034
7 years ago

Not the point, but I haven’t given up on Kohl Stewart yet lol.

The Rockies sometimes seem more inept than the other awful teams, and then they make the playoffs and it is confusing all around.