2022 ZiPS Projections: Milwaukee Brewers

After having typically appeared in the hallowed pages of Baseball Think Factory, Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections have now been released at FanGraphs for a decade. The exercise continues this offseason. Below are the projections for the Milwaukee Brewers.

Batters

I can’t say I’m displeased to see Luis Urías at the top of the batter list — I’ve long been fascinated by him and even featured him on my breakout list last year — but I’d definitely be uneasy about having him as my team’s best player. Urías projects to essentially repeat his 2021 season. Third base (or second) is a better long-term home for him than shortstop, so last year’s Willy Adames acquisition showed the correct instinct on Milwaukee’s part.

I hoped that by this point, another year removed from 2019’s fractured kneecap and with a normal season, Christian Yelich’s career would be back on track. Perhaps a repeat of his MVP-worthy 2018 and ’19 peak was overly optimistic, but I at least thought he’d maintain the level of play he showed before the trade to the Brew Crew. While his batting average rebounded from 2020’s Mendoza Line-adjacent .205 thanks to a more typical BABIP, he was far from challenging for the BA crown. Just as worrisome, the power he had previously interspersed among his voluminous line drives wholly disappeared. Some of the blame can be placed on his back issues, but back issues can be quite difficult to resolve long-term. Even in Yelich’s good months, such as his .313/.359/.470 August, the home run power was missing. Yelich’s decline is one of the big reasons Milwaukee only ranked 23rd in wRC+ in 2021 and 24th in ’20. The offense was never quite as good as it was thought to be — their recent wRC+ peak was 11th in 2018 — and his pumpkinification has damaged the team’s run-scoring potential.

Compensating for Yelich’s missing output has proven tricky. Lorenzo Cain’s offensive decline was always expected given his age, so it’s unlikely there will be a nice surprise boost from center this season. Hunter Renfroe effectively replaces Avisaíl García, but like García, Renfroe is simply a complementary talent. Rowdy Tellez is in a similar talent tier at first base. The likely adoption of the universal designated hitter is unfortunate for the Brewers in the near-term; they simply don’t have the in-house bats to credibly field another position where the offense is crucial.

ZiPS does not see immediate help on the horizon, either. Garrett Mitchell was overmatched in Double-A, and Brice Turang’s minor league offense was almost entirely walks-based, an inauspicious sign for a prospect. ZiPS thinks Joey Wiemer has a solid future, but that future is unlikely to start in 2022. As for Keston Hiura, there’s still hope for him, but he’s going to need to get over a severe case of prospect’s disease; based on his 2021 performance, there’s no position in the majors that both his glove and bat can support.

Now, ZiPS may be underestimating Omar Narváez, given the quickness of his defensive turnaround, but it’s hard to see much realistic upside in the lineup as a whole, and the team’s projected depth is weak across the board. Short of some pleasant surprises, Milwaukee’s lineup will be hard-pressed to be league average.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Pitchers

The projections are considerably better on this side of the team. ZiPS has historically been a Corbin Burnes truther, and his Cy Young-winning 2021 performance quite obviously didn’t change the computer’s mind. His comp list is almost entirely elite pitchers in their prime, with names like Roger Clemens, Jose Rijo, Camilo Pascual, Roy Oswalt, John Smoltz, Ron Guidry, and Orel Hershiser peppering the top 10. His top comp, Kevin Appier, is probably better than you remember. Go ahead and click. I’ll wait, since that’s how writing works.

Brandon Woodruff is nearly on Burnes’ level and, almost as important, has now also shown that he can maintain his health for a full load of innings. If Freddy Peralta can throw at least 160 or so innings, he’s a projected All-Star as well. ZiPS loves the team’s depth after the top three as well. The computer would really like to see Aaron Ashby stretched out more than the team seems inclined to, but Adrian Houser, Eric Lauer, and Ethan Small all project as average or better. ZiPS even holds out hope for Josh Lindblom. While Milwaukee could pick up another starting pitcher, I think offensive additions are more crucial now, a reversal of the situation from a few years ago.

Like the rotation, the bullpen projects near the top of baseball. Of the quartet of Ashby, Josh Hader, Devin Williams, and Jake Cousins, Cousins has the worst ERA+ projection at a very impressive 135 (Ashby’s at 137 as a full-time reliever). The depth chart projection for the relievers would be even better if not for the fact that ZiPS believes that a back-end of the bullpen of Hoby Milner, Angel Perdomo, and Luke Barker would be considerably more effective than Trevor Gott, Jandel Gustave, and J.C. Mejía.

Overall, I think the Brewers are in a race with the Cardinals. I’d probably give a slight edge to St. Louis, but the Brewers possibly have more upside thanks to the pitching, especially in a postseason scenario. And there’s still time remaining for improvements to be made in free agency part deux.

Ballpark graphic courtesy Eephus League. Depth charts constructed by way of those listed here.

Batters – Standard
Player B Age PO PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS
Luis Urías R 25 SS 587 508 76 128 25 3 20 75 63 126 6 2
Christian Yelich L 30 LF 519 441 80 118 22 3 22 70 71 125 15 3
Willy Adames R 26 SS 584 524 76 134 27 2 24 69 56 168 6 4
Kolten Wong L 31 2B 504 446 61 118 24 3 12 48 37 84 13 5
Lorenzo Cain R 36 CF 431 388 51 103 19 0 9 34 37 75 14 4
Hunter Renfroe R 30 RF 525 472 72 108 22 0 31 81 45 140 3 1
Omar Narváez L 30 C 438 387 48 98 16 0 13 48 42 86 0 0
Renato Núñez R 28 1B 496 446 63 110 20 1 25 77 37 128 1 0
Rowdy Tellez L 27 1B 451 407 55 105 21 1 21 61 35 103 1 1
Daniel Vogelbach L 29 1B 416 348 52 79 14 0 18 55 66 97 0 0
Tyrone Taylor R 28 LF 355 322 42 77 15 3 13 49 23 82 6 1
Jace Peterson L 32 2B 392 342 45 82 16 2 9 42 45 88 11 2
Brice Turang L 22 SS 529 477 72 112 20 3 10 46 45 111 15 6
Mike Brosseau R 28 3B 408 366 50 85 18 1 14 47 31 110 4 1
Tyler White R 31 1B 396 337 51 81 17 1 11 42 48 82 1 1
Joey Wiemer R 23 RF 500 455 62 108 15 1 21 62 36 127 15 3
Jamie Westbrook R 27 2B 430 388 52 92 17 2 14 50 28 86 2 1
Mark Mathias R 27 2B 394 350 42 80 20 1 7 35 33 94 9 2
Pablo Reyes R 28 3B 318 287 38 66 15 1 8 33 24 66 6 4
Daniel Robertson R 28 SS 280 240 30 53 9 0 5 20 31 74 1 1
Garrett Mitchell L 23 CF 324 292 44 65 9 1 10 33 30 92 10 2
Jon Singleton L 30 1B 478 403 59 83 18 0 20 58 69 148 2 0
Jonathan Davis R 30 CF 350 305 44 62 12 2 8 30 29 94 11 3
Jakson Reetz R 26 C 331 293 35 56 11 1 9 29 28 96 1 1
David Fry R 26 3B 446 407 47 85 19 1 13 46 32 121 2 2
Weston Wilson R 27 1B 383 347 41 75 14 2 15 43 33 107 7 3
Kevin Kramer L 28 SS 392 347 44 74 16 1 9 40 33 114 2 3
Matt Lipka R 30 CF 370 338 41 75 14 2 9 34 23 98 17 6
Mario Feliciano R 23 C 323 296 36 65 12 2 10 37 16 98 1 1
Tyler Friis B 26 2B 198 177 19 38 7 1 2 13 18 41 6 3
Brett Sullivan L 28 C 374 345 40 80 17 2 8 35 24 64 9 4
Hernan Perez R 31 2B 271 253 31 59 12 0 8 25 16 69 7 1
Luke Maile R 31 C 176 157 20 32 8 0 2 15 16 52 1 0
Gabe Holt L 24 2B 450 408 67 98 14 0 4 30 36 72 7 1
Pedro Severino R 28 C 400 360 34 83 15 1 10 46 33 99 1 0
Andruw Monasterio R 25 3B 420 375 47 83 14 2 6 31 35 114 5 4
Abraham Almonte B 33 LF 309 267 42 61 17 2 9 32 41 71 5 3
Dylan Cozens L 28 RF 161 137 18 23 5 1 7 18 21 69 4 2
Keston Hiura R 25 1B 493 440 58 100 21 2 19 60 37 166 8 4
Brent Diaz R 26 C 218 193 23 35 7 0 5 18 17 74 2 2
Keon Broxton R 32 CF 287 257 28 49 5 1 7 21 24 128 9 3
Hayden Cantrelle B 23 2B 413 354 48 71 11 1 8 27 47 120 14 4
Dustin Peterson R 27 LF 358 330 41 80 15 1 10 41 21 73 1 1
Zach Green R 28 3B 362 324 42 64 16 1 16 48 30 143 0 1
Christian Kelley R 28 C 222 200 23 39 7 1 4 18 17 64 0 0
Mitch Longo L 27 LF 376 346 38 79 15 2 9 31 23 94 13 2
Zavier Warren B 23 3B 417 380 51 83 13 1 12 42 30 102 4 0
Garrett Whitley R 25 LF 383 341 32 71 12 2 10 27 34 148 8 5
David Dahl L 28 LF 392 361 44 87 20 2 11 42 22 102 4 2
Luis Castro R 26 1B 398 349 45 72 13 1 12 38 34 129 5 2
Logan Forsythe R 35 2B 309 272 27 57 11 1 5 25 33 82 2 0
Cam Devanney R 25 2B 329 295 37 54 9 1 6 26 23 97 4 4
Troy Stokes Jr. R 26 RF 340 299 34 58 14 1 8 27 33 95 10 2
Jacob Nottingham R 27 1B 273 243 29 46 11 0 9 34 20 100 3 1
Thomas Dillard B 24 1B 426 377 49 73 12 1 13 41 41 152 4 1
Korry Howell R 23 CF 429 390 43 78 14 2 12 37 31 141 13 4
Tristen Lutz R 23 RF 356 327 38 71 12 1 8 31 22 122 2 4
Chad Spanberger L 26 RF 410 375 41 71 14 1 13 42 29 143 3 2
Yeison Coca B 23 3B 354 328 34 61 10 2 6 26 23 116 7 6
Jesus Lujano L 23 LF 336 313 34 66 11 1 6 24 18 91 7 3
Je’Von Ward L 22 LF 377 347 40 70 12 2 6 30 23 112 6 5

Batters – Advanced
Player BA OBP SLG OPS+ ISO BABIP RC/27 Def WAR No. 1 Comp
Luis Urías .252 .346 .431 106 .179 .298 5.4 -1 3.0 Kurt Stillwell
Christian Yelich .268 .374 .481 126 .213 .327 6.8 -1 2.9 John Kruk
Willy Adames .256 .328 .452 105 .197 .331 5.3 0 2.9 Jhonny Peralta
Kolten Wong .265 .337 .413 99 .148 .303 5.2 7 2.6 Todd Walker
Lorenzo Cain .265 .334 .384 91 .119 .309 4.9 7 2.0 Jose Cardenal
Hunter Renfroe .229 .295 .472 100 .244 .256 4.9 5 1.7 Bill Melton
Omar Narváez .253 .331 .395 93 .142 .295 4.7 -1 1.6 Eddie Taubensee
Renato Núñez .247 .314 .464 104 .217 .290 5.2 0 1.3 Matthew LeCroy
Rowdy Tellez .258 .324 .469 108 .211 .297 5.5 -1 1.2 Daryle Ward
Daniel Vogelbach .227 .351 .422 105 .195 .262 5.2 -1 1.2 Ed Herrmann
Tyrone Taylor .239 .299 .425 90 .186 .282 4.7 5 1.0 Raul Ibanez
Jace Peterson .240 .332 .377 89 .137 .298 4.7 -2 1.0 Luis Alicea
Brice Turang .235 .302 .352 74 .117 .287 3.8 3 0.9 Billy Bates
Mike Brosseau .232 .304 .402 86 .169 .293 4.4 1 0.9 Matt Craig
Tyler White .240 .338 .395 95 .154 .287 4.7 1 0.8 Jarrod Patterson
Joey Wiemer .237 .299 .413 87 .176 .283 4.6 2 0.8 Chad Mottola
Jamie Westbrook .237 .295 .399 83 .162 .271 4.2 1 0.7 Billy Jurges
Mark Mathias .229 .301 .351 74 .123 .293 3.9 4 0.7 Edgar Gonzalez
Pablo Reyes .230 .292 .373 76 .143 .272 3.7 6 0.7 Brad Seitzer
Daniel Robertson .221 .326 .321 74 .100 .298 3.6 0 0.5 Chris Gomez
Garrett Mitchell .223 .299 .363 76 .140 .289 4.0 -1 0.3 Kevin Koslofski
Jon Singleton .206 .322 .400 91 .194 .268 4.4 -3 0.3 Pat Dodson
Jonathan Davis .203 .296 .334 68 .131 .266 3.5 1 0.2 Ryan Christenson
Jakson Reetz .191 .279 .328 61 .137 .250 3.0 2 0.2 Blake Barthol
David Fry .209 .274 .356 66 .147 .264 3.3 5 0.2 Scott White
Weston Wilson .216 .287 .398 80 .182 .267 4.0 4 0.2 Chad Rupp
Kevin Kramer .213 .287 .343 67 .130 .290 3.3 1 0.1 Emerson Frostad
Matt Lipka .222 .278 .355 67 .133 .286 3.6 2 0.1 Randy Kutcher
Mario Feliciano .220 .266 .375 68 .155 .293 3.4 0 0.1 Andy Stewart
Tyler Friis .215 .289 .299 58 .085 .269 3.0 3 0.1 Joe Morales
Brett Sullivan .232 .283 .362 71 .130 .264 3.6 -3 0.1 Mike Heath
Hernan Perez .233 .278 .375 72 .142 .290 3.9 -1 0.1 Steve Sisco
Luke Maile .204 .286 .293 55 .089 .291 2.9 1 0.1 Paul Hoover
Gabe Holt .240 .307 .304 64 .064 .283 3.5 1 0.0 John Skorochocki
Pedro Severino .231 .298 .361 75 .131 .291 3.8 -6 0.0 Jason Jaramillo
Andruw Monasterio .221 .290 .317 62 .096 .302 3.1 4 0.0 Scott Leius
Abraham Almonte .228 .330 .408 96 .180 .278 4.7 -7 0.0 Jose Cruz
Dylan Cozens .168 .281 .372 72 .204 .262 3.4 1 -0.1 Doug Frobel
Keston Hiura .227 .303 .414 89 .186 .318 4.4 -4 -0.1 Jeff Baker
Brent Diaz .181 .263 .295 49 .114 .263 2.5 3 -0.1 Patrick Arlis
Keon Broxton .191 .263 .300 50 .109 .344 2.7 5 -0.1 Damon Buford
Hayden Cantrelle .201 .302 .305 63 .105 .279 3.3 -1 -0.1 Charlie Montoyo
Dustin Peterson .242 .292 .385 79 .142 .283 4.0 0 -0.2 Danny Buxbaum
Zach Green .198 .272 .401 76 .204 .291 3.6 -4 -0.2 Paul Russo
Christian Kelley .195 .267 .300 51 .105 .265 2.7 1 -0.2 Tom Nieto
Mitch Longo .228 .281 .361 70 .133 .288 3.8 1 -0.3 Jim Wawruck
Zavier Warren .218 .280 .353 67 .134 .267 3.5 -2 -0.3 Chad Tredaway
Garrett Whitley .208 .286 .343 67 .135 .333 3.3 3 -0.3 Brian Rosinski
David Dahl .241 .287 .399 80 .158 .306 4.1 -3 -0.3 Rod Allen
Luis Castro .206 .294 .352 72 .146 .288 3.6 1 -0.3 Howard Prager
Logan Forsythe .210 .301 .313 64 .103 .281 3.3 -5 -0.5 Keith Ginter
Cam Devanney .183 .254 .281 43 .098 .250 2.2 4 -0.7 Gil Velazquez
Troy Stokes Jr. .194 .285 .328 63 .134 .255 3.3 -2 -0.8 Chad Alexander
Jacob Nottingham .189 .267 .346 62 .156 .276 3.1 -1 -0.8 Matt Hagen
Thomas Dillard .194 .276 .334 62 .141 .283 3.1 0 -1.1 Allen Butler
Korry Howell .200 .269 .338 61 .138 .278 3.2 -7 -1.1 Hipolito Martinez
Tristen Lutz .217 .273 .333 61 .116 .320 3.0 -3 -1.3 Jim Olander
Chad Spanberger .189 .252 .336 55 .147 .265 2.8 -1 -1.5 Garrick Haltiwanger
Yeison Coca .186 .241 .284 39 .098 .267 2.1 0 -1.6 Brian Shipp
Jesus Lujano .211 .260 .310 51 .099 .278 2.8 -7 -1.9 Wes Pratt
Je’Von Ward .202 .251 .300 46 .098 .279 2.4 -5 -2.2 Randy Rigsby

Pitchers – Standard
Player T Age W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO FIP
Corbin Burnes R 27 11 5 2.77 27 26 156.0 116 48 13 48 204 2.71
Brandon Woodruff R 29 11 6 3.08 28 27 157.7 126 54 16 40 187 3.02
Freddy Peralta R 26 10 6 3.59 35 25 143.0 103 57 18 61 198 3.49
Aaron Ashby L 24 10 6 3.67 38 19 112.7 94 46 12 52 136 3.69
Josh Hader L 28 5 2 2.34 59 0 61.7 33 16 7 24 106 2.53
Adrian Houser R 29 8 7 4.37 29 24 127.7 125 62 15 51 99 4.52
Josh Lindblom R 35 6 5 4.25 26 20 118.7 118 56 17 33 111 4.18
Devin Williams R 27 7 3 2.57 55 0 56.0 36 16 5 27 92 2.66
Eric Lauer L 27 7 7 4.49 27 23 126.3 120 63 20 46 127 4.44
Noah Zavolas R 26 6 6 4.77 22 22 115.0 122 61 18 33 87 4.72
Brett Anderson L 34 7 7 4.73 22 22 99.0 107 52 14 30 59 4.83
Ethan Small L 25 3 3 4.50 19 19 76.0 72 38 10 37 76 4.51
Alec Bettinger R 26 6 6 4.86 25 21 113.0 118 61 20 34 99 4.79
Andy Otero L 30 4 3 4.39 22 11 65.7 65 32 10 19 62 4.28
Caleb Boushley R 28 7 7 4.95 24 19 107.3 118 59 19 29 85 4.88
Jake Cousins R 27 2 1 3.27 42 1 44.0 33 16 5 18 60 3.43
Brent Suter L 32 7 6 4.11 46 4 65.7 65 30 10 18 57 4.29
Jesús Castillo R 26 6 7 4.98 28 18 99.3 111 55 16 28 61 5.07
Blaine Hardy L 35 5 5 4.55 30 7 59.3 59 30 9 22 48 4.75
Hoby Milner L 31 1 1 3.83 49 0 51.7 47 22 9 14 62 4.03
Luke Barker R 30 6 4 3.91 48 0 53.0 48 23 8 15 58 3.97
Dylan File R 26 6 7 5.18 19 19 90.3 99 52 18 24 71 5.16
Daniel Norris L 29 3 2 4.05 59 0 60.0 55 27 8 25 63 4.16
Carlos Luna R 25 4 4 5.06 15 12 64.0 69 36 13 17 53 5.10
Angel Perdomo L 28 2 2 4.18 36 2 47.3 36 22 6 32 68 4.24
Nick Bennett L 24 5 6 5.24 21 16 91.0 96 53 16 42 77 5.32
Thomas Jankins R 26 5 6 5.36 25 17 97.3 109 58 18 32 67 5.35
Clayton Andrews L 25 3 2 4.09 24 0 33.0 29 15 4 18 37 4.24
Victor Castaneda R 23 6 7 5.42 24 21 99.7 105 60 19 43 86 5.41
Peter Strzelecki R 27 1 1 4.33 40 0 52.0 49 25 7 21 53 4.28
Kyle Lobstein L 32 3 3 4.84 37 5 61.3 61 33 9 26 52 4.81
Jason Alexander R 29 4 5 5.37 17 13 70.3 76 42 13 27 55 5.34
John Curtiss R 29 2 2 4.67 39 3 44.3 42 23 8 18 48 4.71
Justin Bullock R 23 7 9 5.48 20 20 88.7 97 54 17 35 68 5.49
Brad Boxberger R 34 4 4 4.47 61 0 52.3 43 26 9 28 68 4.59
Colin Rea R 31 5 6 5.42 17 14 74.7 82 45 16 26 61 5.54
Hunter Strickland R 33 2 2 4.47 50 0 48.3 45 24 8 19 50 4.57
Connor Sadzeck R 30 3 3 4.46 38 0 42.3 40 21 5 24 40 4.67
Matt Hardy R 26 3 3 4.78 33 2 52.7 53 28 8 23 49 4.77
John Axford R 39 1 1 4.30 22 0 23.0 21 11 2 11 23 3.88
J.T. Hintzen R 26 4 3 4.71 38 1 57.3 55 30 10 25 61 4.78
R.J. Alvarez R 31 3 2 4.54 40 0 39.7 37 20 5 21 41 4.49
Trevor Gott R 29 3 2 4.68 45 1 42.3 39 22 7 18 46 4.57
Miguel Sánchez R 28 3 3 4.70 45 1 53.7 52 28 9 23 54 4.80
Jordan Zimmermann R 36 4 6 5.59 18 18 87.0 101 54 19 20 64 5.34
Taylor Floyd R 24 4 3 4.62 40 0 50.7 47 26 7 26 52 4.64
Eric Yardley R 31 2 2 4.68 54 0 57.7 62 30 7 21 37 4.78
Jandel Gustave R 29 2 2 4.69 40 0 40.3 39 21 6 15 36 4.67
Chad Sobotka R 28 2 2 4.74 47 0 43.7 41 23 6 24 43 4.78
Justin Topa R 31 1 2 5.00 21 1 27.0 29 15 4 9 22 4.59
Moises Gomez R 25 3 3 4.93 38 1 49.3 49 27 8 24 47 5.02
Robbie Hitt R 26 3 3 4.81 40 0 48.7 48 26 5 29 41 4.80
Zack Brown R 27 3 3 5.63 22 13 76.7 81 48 14 42 64 5.68
Hobie Harris R 29 3 3 4.87 37 0 40.7 39 22 6 22 42 4.80
Trevor Kelley R 28 4 4 4.87 45 0 48.0 48 26 8 21 46 4.87
J.C. Mejía R 25 5 7 5.84 26 16 74.0 80 48 16 36 63 5.91
Braden Webb R 27 5 7 5.64 35 8 59.0 57 37 9 43 58 5.59
Quintin Torres-Costa L 27 2 2 5.26 35 0 37.7 34 22 5 28 40 5.17
Lucas Erceg R 27 3 5 6.11 23 13 45.7 47 31 8 35 37 6.33
Bubba Derby R 28 4 5 5.79 26 9 74.7 80 48 17 34 64 5.95
Rex Brothers L 34 2 2 5.36 48 0 45.3 36 27 8 35 64 5.23
Cam Robinson R 22 2 3 5.40 38 1 50.0 51 30 7 33 43 5.44
Patrick Weigel R 27 2 3 5.91 36 6 56.3 57 37 11 38 55 5.95
Arnaldo Hernandez R 26 6 10 6.62 25 23 121.0 148 89 31 55 73 6.82

Pitchers – Advanced
Player K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BB% K% BABIP ERA+ ERA- WAR No. 1 Comp
Corbin Burnes 11.8 2.8 0.8 7.6% 32.4% .288 160 63 4.7 Kevin Appier
Brandon Woodruff 10.7 2.3 0.9 6.3% 29.4% .285 143 70 4.1 Jose Rijo
Freddy Peralta 12.5 3.8 1.1 10.3% 33.4% .276 123 81 3.0 Chan Ho Park
Aaron Ashby 10.9 4.2 1.0 10.8% 28.2% .296 120 83 2.2 Johan Santana
Josh Hader 15.5 3.5 1.0 9.9% 43.8% .255 189 53 2.0 Jesse Orosco
Adrian Houser 7.0 3.6 1.1 9.2% 17.8% .286 101 99 1.6 Bob Rush
Josh Lindblom 8.4 2.5 1.3 6.5% 21.9% .299 104 96 1.6 Gil Heredia
Devin Williams 14.8 4.3 0.8 11.7% 39.8% .298 172 58 1.5 Mark Littell
Eric Lauer 9.0 3.3 1.4 8.5% 23.5% .292 99 102 1.4 Mark Redman
Noah Zavolas 6.8 2.6 1.4 6.6% 17.5% .295 93 108 1.0 Dave Telgheder
Brett Anderson 5.4 2.7 1.3 7.0% 13.8% .288 94 107 0.9 Zane Smith
Ethan Small 9.0 4.4 1.2 11.0% 22.6% .297 98 102 0.9 Bryan Hickerson
Alec Bettinger 7.9 2.7 1.6 7.0% 20.2% .297 91 110 0.9 Elizardo Ramirez
Andy Otero 8.5 2.6 1.4 6.8% 22.2% .297 101 99 0.8 Rheal Cormier
Caleb Boushley 7.1 2.4 1.6 6.2% 18.2% .302 89 112 0.7 Josh Towers
Jake Cousins 12.3 3.7 1.0 9.7% 32.4% .286 135 74 0.7 Scott Williamson
Brent Suter 7.8 2.5 1.4 6.5% 20.7% .289 108 93 0.7 Carl Willis
Jesús Castillo 5.5 2.5 1.4 6.4% 14.0% .293 89 113 0.6 Nick Blackburn
Blaine Hardy 7.3 3.3 1.4 8.6% 18.7% .284 97 103 0.5 Darren Oliver
Hoby Milner 10.8 2.4 1.6 6.5% 28.7% .297 115 87 0.5 Randy Flores
Luke Barker 9.8 2.5 1.4 6.8% 26.1% .290 113 88 0.5 Mark Huismann
Dylan File 7.1 2.4 1.8 6.1% 18.1% .296 85 117 0.4 Greg Wooten
Daniel Norris 9.5 3.8 1.2 9.7% 24.4% .294 109 92 0.4 Buddy Schultz
Carlos Luna 7.5 2.4 1.8 6.2% 19.2% .295 87 115 0.4 Geoff Geary
Angel Perdomo 12.9 6.1 1.1 15.2% 32.2% .297 106 95 0.3 Armando Almanza
Nick Bennett 7.6 4.2 1.6 10.3% 18.8% .297 84 119 0.3 Rocky Cherry
Thomas Jankins 6.2 3.0 1.7 7.4% 15.6% .295 82 121 0.2 Keith Evans
Clayton Andrews 10.1 4.9 1.1 12.4% 25.5% .294 108 93 0.2 Luke Walker
Victor Castaneda 7.8 3.9 1.7 9.6% 19.3% .295 82 123 0.2 Justin Miller
Peter Strzelecki 9.2 3.6 1.2 9.3% 23.6% .298 102 98 0.2 Hipolito Pichardo
Kyle Lobstein 7.6 3.8 1.3 9.6% 19.3% .289 91 110 0.2 Mike Venafro
Jason Alexander 7.0 3.5 1.7 8.6% 17.6% .294 82 122 0.2 Jed Murray
John Curtiss 9.7 3.7 1.6 9.4% 25.0% .293 95 106 0.2 Tim Layana
Justin Bullock 6.9 3.6 1.7 8.8% 17.2% .295 81 124 0.2 Bill Fulton
Brad Boxberger 11.7 4.8 1.5 12.3% 29.8% .283 99 101 0.1 Rich DeLucia
Colin Rea 7.4 3.1 1.9 7.9% 18.5% .296 82 123 0.1 James Baldwin
Hunter Strickland 9.3 3.5 1.5 9.1% 24.0% .287 99 101 0.1 Doug Henry
Connor Sadzeck 8.5 5.1 1.1 12.6% 21.1% .294 99 101 0.1 Ernie Camacho
Matt Hardy 8.4 3.9 1.4 9.9% 21.0% .300 92 108 0.1 Mauro Zarate
John Axford 9.0 4.3 0.8 11.0% 23.0% .302 103 97 0.1 Doug Brocail
J.T. Hintzen 9.6 3.9 1.6 10.0% 24.3% .296 94 107 0.1 John Johnstone
R.J. Alvarez 9.3 4.8 1.1 11.9% 23.3% .299 97 103 0.1 Matt Karchner
Trevor Gott 9.8 3.8 1.5 9.8% 25.1% .291 95 106 0.1 Alan Mills
Miguel Sánchez 9.1 3.9 1.5 9.8% 23.0% .295 94 106 0.1 Hipolito Pichardo
Jordan Zimmermann 6.6 2.1 2.0 5.3% 16.9% .301 79 126 0.1 Kevin Jarvis
Taylor Floyd 9.2 4.6 1.2 11.6% 23.1% .292 96 104 0.0 Blaine Neal
Eric Yardley 5.8 3.3 1.1 8.2% 14.5% .296 94 106 0.0 John Boozer
Jandel Gustave 8.0 3.3 1.3 8.6% 20.6% .287 94 106 0.0 Ron Musselman
Chad Sobotka 8.9 4.9 1.2 12.3% 22.1% .292 93 107 0.0 Gabriel Dehoyos
Justin Topa 7.3 3.0 1.3 7.6% 18.6% .305 88 113 0.0 Shawn Camp
Moises Gomez 8.6 4.4 1.5 10.9% 21.3% .295 90 111 -0.1 Brandon Kolb
Robbie Hitt 7.6 5.4 0.9 13.1% 18.5% .299 92 109 -0.1 Casey Daigle
Zack Brown 7.5 4.9 1.6 12.0% 18.2% .295 78 127 -0.1 J.D. Durbin
Hobie Harris 9.3 4.9 1.3 12.1% 23.1% .300 91 110 -0.1 Dwight Bernard
Trevor Kelley 8.6 3.9 1.5 9.9% 21.7% .296 91 110 -0.1 Jesus Colome
J.C. Mejía 7.7 4.4 1.9 10.7% 18.7% .294 76 132 -0.2 William Juarez
Braden Webb 8.8 6.6 1.4 15.5% 20.9% .294 78 128 -0.2 Travis Anderson
Quintin Torres-Costa 9.6 6.7 1.2 16.0% 22.9% .290 84 119 -0.2 Thomas Hart
Lucas Erceg 7.3 6.9 1.6 16.0% 16.9% .287 72 138 -0.3 Dennis Long
Bubba Derby 7.7 4.1 2.0 10.1% 19.0% .289 76 131 -0.3 John Pawlowski
Rex Brothers 12.7 6.9 1.6 16.7% 30.6% .286 82 121 -0.3 Doug Creek
Cam Robinson 7.7 5.9 1.3 14.2% 18.5% .299 82 122 -0.3 Ray Soff
Patrick Weigel 8.8 6.1 1.8 14.4% 20.9% .295 75 134 -0.4 Kenny Marrero
Arnaldo Hernandez 5.4 4.1 2.3 9.8% 13.0% .295 67 150 -1.3 Bryan Eversgerd

Players are listed with their most recent teams wherever possible. This includes players who are unsigned, players who will miss 2022 due to injury, and players who were released in 2021. So yes, if you see Joe Schmoe, who quit baseball back in August to form a big band orchestra that only plays nu-metal versions of baroque cantatas, he’s still listed here intentionally. ZiPS is assuming a league with an ERA of 4.36, similar to the post-June substance-enforcement environment.

Both hitters and pitchers are ranked by projected zWAR, which is to say, WAR values as calculated by me, Dan Szymborski, whose surname is spelled with a z. WAR values might differ slightly from those that appear in the full release of ZiPS. Finally, I will advise anyone against — and might karate chop anyone guilty of — merely adding up WAR totals on a depth chart to produce projected team WAR. ZiPS is assuming that the designated hitter will continue in force in 2022.

ZiPS is agnostic about future playing time by design. For more information about ZiPS, please refer to this article, or get angry at Dan on Twitter.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

91 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
scotth855Member since 2020
4 years ago

Congrats on the final team projection, Dan!

Why does ZIPs estimate Burnes/Woodruff with one relief appearance each?

Mark Hogan
4 years ago

Hi, FYI – Brandon Woodruff’s hyperlink goes to Brandon Wood.

BaseballBundesligaMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark Hogan

Also always overjoyed for the Johan Santa sighting (Aaron Ashby).

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago

It’s exciting

MichaelMember since 2017
4 years ago

The comps for the first 5 Brewer’s pitchers are kind of ridiculous. Appier, Rijo, Park , Santana and Orosco! I’d take similar results, That’s kinda cool.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
4 years ago

Saw this comment and held out hope that someone comped to the real Johan Santa.

grandbranyanMember since 2017
4 years ago

Adames should be a pretty easy over on his 256/328/452 projection

TB home | 626 PAs | 219/277/347
TB road | 628 PAs | 291/363/495
Brewers | 413 PAs | 285/366/521

It might still feel counterintuitive to some since the Brewers were were pretty much always slugging plenty with no pitching or defense, but Stearns & company have definitely flipped the script.

Over their four year playoff run, Milwaukee position players are dead nuts even 15th in MLB with a 100 wRC+. But they are also 1st in defensive value at +99.6, with 2nd all the way down at +62.7. Cromulent offense plus elite defense has worked out to the 9th best position player group over the last four years.

hombremomento
4 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

I agree on the Adames part- you don’t have to be a super analyst to see how much better Adames was after leaving the trop. 74 wRC+ with Tampa vs 135 wRC+ with Milwaukee only makes that more evident

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

I also would not use any of Tampa’s home numbers for Adames going forward. There were all kinds of news reports that he couldn’t see the ball at home, and his road numbers were consistently about the same.

Barring something like a return to to form from Yelich, Adames is very likely the Brewers’ best position player. He was roughly performing at a 5.5-6 win pace last year for the Brewers, so he could easily regress a fair amount and still top every other position player’s WAR total on his team by a lot.

Chaise Kahlenbeck
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

This isn’t that difficult of a task, but I’ve thought since the Adames trade/his subsequent success away from the Trop that some smart R&D department could look for diamonds in the rough that struggle at the Trop but mash on the road. I don’t know if those players exist in high numbers, but all you have to do is hit on one.

Nelson Cruz’s post-trade home splits come to mind as potentially having to do with sight problems.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

The Adames situation was a little more obvious than others because he told a newspaper reporter he couldn’t see at the Trop once they put the new lights in, and the splits were so ridiculously stark. He was the Rays’ worst hitter at home and the best one on the road (from 2019 to 2021, the difference was a 58 wRC+ vs a 138).

I think the reason why this might be trickier than it looks–and also may be the reason why Nelson Cruz might make sense–is that the Trop is probably screwing up everyone’s vision a little bit, and so Tampa’s batters may just be more used to it than their opponents. So it’s not that easy to find guys who will fit this. But Nelson Cruz very well might, since he would have had to adjust to the new lighting mid-season.

Chaise Kahlenbeck
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oh, for sure it was out there in the open – really feel like it was a missed opportunity for other teams in need of a shortstop to take a calculated gamble.

I’d be interested to see more of Taylor Walls (fits the mold of new exposure to the Trop and is a switch hitter – the other two are righties so there could be something there as well). His home/road splits are pretty stark, but he was also exposed in the second half of the year and obviously has SSS caveats. He’s in a bit of a logjam anyhow, so it’d be an interesting shot for someone needing middle infield depth.

deaconbluerayMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d told the Rays not to install that black light system a few years ago. You can see how much that’s hurt them…

All kidding aside, this just doesn’t really make sense. Somebody should provide some proof about “Tropicana Field lighting syndrome.” What’s the problem? Is it too dark? Is the color of the artificial light different than at other parks (too white or too yellow)? Is the hitter’s background the wrong color, or does the light color clash with the background? Does MLB not have very specific standards for lights? I would think the MLBPA would be all over this if the batters can’t see the ball clearly — that’s dangerous.

Or could it be that Willy Adames just didn’t like regularly playing in front of relatively sparse crowds and developed a bit of a downer about his home park? It pains me to admit that as a Rays fan, but anytime the locals show up in decent numbers the Rays’ players never fail to mention it in post-game interviews.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  deaconblueray

There are some weird differences in how well people see in different types of light. I know someone who cannot see in dim light at all–her husband always has to drive at night because she can’t see anything. There appears to be nothing “wrong” with her eyes to fix–she just can’t see. I thought that was weird but in turns out it is real–it’s called “night blindness.”

In Adames’ case, it is probably the reverse of that, some type of light sensitivity. It’s probably mild enough that when he faced home plate at the Trop it wasn’t an issue, but in the batter’s box it was just bad enough that he couldn’t pick up the ball until a split-second later, when it was too late to get it.

I suppose it’s possible it was just that it’s depressing playing at the Trop but could it be that depressing? Like, going from an all-star to unplayable level of depressing? And for it to only happen at home?

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
4 years ago

One of the earlier Fangraphs articles I remember from our old friend Dave Cameron was about how the Angels’ Rock and the batter’s eye may have added even more deception to Jered Weaver’s delivery w/ the arm slot

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Nelson Cruz also with the same dropoff.

deaconbluerayMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I hear you, dl, but Cruz was also hit with a pitch in the forearm and had Covid during his two months with the Rays, so there were other issues that could have contributed to his underwhelming performance with the team. And of course, dude is simply getting older every day and he may have worn down over the long season. I’m 54 and I sure don’t have the stamina I had even five or six years ago.

kylerkelton
4 years ago

Lol at the Yelich/Kruk comp. One of Kruk’s thighs is as big around as Yelich’s waist.

MentholMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  kylerkelton

Yeah, that one struck me as odd, and not just for reasons of body type. Although I was impressed to discover that Kruk stole 18 bags one year.

Boxkutter
4 years ago
Reply to  Menthol

Depending on how much they cost, that could be considered either a misdemeanor or a felony.

NickMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Even as a small child, I remember being struck by the incongruity of Kruk’s Starting Lineup action figure (which looked more like Yelich) compared to the actual man. Kenner may have been forced to comply with the listed height and weight when making their molds.

Cave Dameron
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Kilograms, right?

kylerkelton
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

I need to start using Kruk’s scale apparently!

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

that’s in stone

hombremomento
4 years ago

How much is Schwarber asking for ATM? I would imagine he’s cheaper than guys like Castellanos or Bryant and can provide great offense to assist the fantastic pitching

grandbranyanMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

Assuming NL DH in 2022 I’d imagine Schwarber ends up too expensive for MIL. Could see them more in on Soler or Conforto though.

CC AFCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

There are reports that he asked for 3/60 before the lockout, which actually seems highly reasonable as an asking price if you assume he’s asking for more than he’s ultimately willing to take.

It’s most definitely less than castellanos and bryant are asking. There were reports that castellanos wants a 7-8 year deal. Didn’t find a dollar figure attached to that, but safe to assume it’s well more on total dollars and probably similar aav to what schwarbs wants. Couldn’t find a clear report on what bryant has been asking.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

If there is an NL DH I would expect the Brewers would be somewhat interested at that price. Otherwise, I’m not sure where he plays in the field in Milwaukee unless they shift Yelich back to right field. I suppose they could always teach him to play first.

The other guys they could go after in case of an NL DH are Nelson Cruz or Jorge Soler. They’d both be cheaper.

iancalMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

I’m sure he’s asking for the moon like everyone else but will settle for Sputnik..

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

This team needs bats and it needs them now! They’ve done the hardest thing by assembling a true playoff rotation based on the 5-4-3-2-1 grouping, with the top starter projected for 5 wins, the second projected for 4, the third projected for 3, and Houser juuuust missing 2 wins here for another slot. They’ve got a franchise cornerstone at shortstop. They just need a big bat at first base and maybe right field (unless you trust Hunter Renfroe more than I do). And a catcher who isn’t terrible to keep Narvaez fresh. Get yourselves Matt Olson and Joc Pederson and let the good times roll!

EDIT: And Jorge Soler or Nelson Cruz to DH!

hebrewMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

oh wow I hadn’t thought about it before but Olsen is literally perfect for the Brewers

CC AFCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I get what you’re saying, but specifically suspect they don’t have the prospects to outbid the market on Olson. A certain Frederick Charles Freeman would look mighty good there, but I have no reason to think they’d pony up at that level

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I think they’d have to give up Urias. Which would be worth it if they could their hands on a good third baseman to replace him. Which is possible, but tricky.

hombremomento
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Donaldson to Brewers? Or you wager his market is too high

hombremomento
4 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

I didn’t realize Donaldson won’t be a FA soon, but I could see maybe a few prospects for JD but honestly its unlikely

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

Donaldson is pretty old, he misses a bunch of time, he’s expensive, and the metrics disagree on his defense (although his OAA, which I would trust more, seems to think he was average on D). So I don’t know. I think he’s probably on a fair deal, so the Brewers could trade a few prospects for him and the Twins could buy it down. Maybe the Brewers would send more and get Garver too.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I like a lot of those guys for the Brewers, Donaldson, Olson, etc. I do think Rowdy is a lot better than he was last year however. The Twins really need to see what Miranda can do. Nothing left to prove in the MILB.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

I don’t know what to make of Rowdy Tellez, but I’m of the mind that his performance with the Brewers is probably a reasonable lower bound expectation for him. He doesn’t have much upside beyond that, although he may be one of those guys who hits much worse as a DH than when he’s playing first.

SyndergaardengnomesMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

They’ve got the rotation and they’ve got the bullpen.

Two out of three ain’t bad.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Yes, but with a couple of bats out of hell to bolster the lineup they’d be fantastic.

CC AFCMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

RIP Eddie. Bless his soul, he really loved that rock and roll

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Paradise by the scoreboard lights?

Shattenjager
4 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

Four wasted youths in one comment thread? I guess the bad girls really do go everywhere.

Neils-Henning Orsted Joc Pederson
4 years ago
Reply to  Shattenjager

Maybe they do. But let me sleep on it.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Luis Urias, Rowdy Tellez, and Brice Turang for Matt Olson and Matt Chapman. Who says no?

(FWIW Urias and Chapman have similar projections for 2022 and Urias is way cheaper and has way more team control. I thought about a deal without Chapman but then the Brewers would have to find a third baseman. I’m not confident either side does this but it sure would be fun).

vslykeMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The A’s would laugh that offer out of the room. Urias has a lot of value, the other 2 do not.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  vslyke

Yeah, maybe it makes more sense as a Urias for Olson deal and the Brewers would find a third baseman somewhere else. Maybe Josh Donaldson or something.

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Maybe (MAYBE) that could budge the A’s on just Chapman, but certainly not both of them. Urias is a classic A’s player who I think they’d like, but Tellez has basically no surplus value and Brice Turang looks more and more like an all-glove utility guy every season

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  proiste

At this point, Urias has much more surplus value than Chapman. I don’t know whether the A’s would see it that way but the perception of Chapman as a megastar is out of date, he’s getting more expensive, and he only has two years of control left. Chapman’s surplus value is something like $60-70M and Urias’s is probably double that (mostly because he has twice as much team control, but also because he’s cheaper on average).

But I do think that the original formulation wouldn’t have worked anyway for reasons you describe. That deal just for Olson might work, and then they’d need to find a third baseman somewhere else. Maybe Josh Donaldson, or Jake Burger.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d do Chapman for Urias pretty readily

proiste
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Sheesh you’re right. Hadn’t looked at Chapman’s profile in-depth in a while – those contact rates are not good!

I agree that’s a good foundation for an Olson deal instead, but I still think the A’s might demand a little more. Urias definitely has more total value that Olson, but Olson is squarely above him in terms of present value, and I don’t know if Tellez and Turang are enough secondary value to move the needle there

John WickMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Minus Chapman not a bad idea but I still think they’ll get outgunned by another team, and the Brewers probably also value Urias more than he’s worth in the abstract, since they need cost-controlled players for their budget as well and also value positional flexibility more than most teams.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Literally anyone affiliated with the A’s, or anyone even vaguely familiar with baseball and that watched an A’s game once, says no

LathundMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

MLBTR projects the Matts at $21.5m in salary for 2022, and more in 2023. After which they are free agents. And as you say, Chapman and Urias (4 years until FA) have somewhat similar projections. So we’re adding some $20m in salary, giving up players with a ton of (cheap) contract years remaining, to upgrade first base.

If the team has the space to add $20m, just go out there and get the best FA bat they can for that money. Rizzo, Schwarber or whoever else it might be.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Lathund

I agree it’s a terrible deal long term for the Brewers!

PC1970Member since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  Lathund

Bingo!

GreggMember since 2020
4 years ago

Wow, ZiPS projects the Brewers pitching staff to pitch 4,528 innings, which over a 162 game season is roughly 28 innings per game. They must be really well-matched against their opponents!

Jimmy DuganMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Gregg

“I will advise anyone against — and might karate chop anyone guilty of — merely adding up WAR totals on a depth chart to produce projected team WAR.”

This statement could apply to adding up playing time totals as well, as that’s where the WAR variance comes from… ZiPS is not a playing time estimator, it’s a rate stat estimator that takes playing time inputs.

GreggMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jimmy Dugan

Why not just make it ZIPS 600 if it’s not a playing time estimator?

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Gregg

I agree entirely!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Gregg

This would actually be a major improvement. The problem is that the PAs / IPs projection is on a different table than the WAR measurement, so you have to constantly scroll back and forth between them to figure out what the WAR means.

I think that Dan should either put PAs / IPs in the bottom table or just put the WAR totals out of 600 PAs (or 180 IPs for starters, 60 IPs for relievers) or something like that. Right now I mostly rely on the graphic because it’s so tricky to move up and down between the two tables.

montrealMember since 2022
4 years ago

Congrats Dan. We have the full set. The Brewers have the best pitching in MLB. Unfortunately their hitting leaves a lot to be desired. They need to either sign a good free agent hitter or make a trade with Houser or Lauer. Move Ashby in to replace one of them. And get a decent hitter for the one they trade.

John WickMember since 2018
4 years ago

The need for a bat or two is obvious, and the good news there is they will have some options since they are looking to fill corner spots. It’s also an area they can upgrade mid-year if they need to. I’d expect them to go the FA route just because they don’t have a strong farm to trade from.

They’ll also probably be looking for a cheap veteran starter. Tricky because they don’t have a rotation spot to guarantee, but they have very little starting depth — Ashby is their sixth starter, Small is an unproven seventh, and a whole lot of nothing after that. I don’t share any of the optimism on Lindblom.

It’s part of what makes me less inclined to join the ‘trade Lauer or Houser for a bat’ crowd. (Houser would be the one to move.)

airforce21oneMember since 2026
4 years ago

Ashby’s #1 comp is Johan Santana? I’m intrigued…

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

Santa. Johan Santa. I think you read that wrong, it happens

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Sorry, I should have added the /s 😀

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago

A Johan Santa(na) comp for your fourth starter? As Bart says, “That ain’t not bad.” This pitching staff is the anti-Rangers…

David Klein
4 years ago

Surprised Yelich’s back problems weren’t mentioned by Dan unless I missed it—those either end careers early like with Wright or hurt players production badly like Mattingly in 90’s and Alfonzo in the early 2000’s. I’m betting on the under on Yelich’s wRC+. This is an incredible pitching staff but the offense is really bad and the main issue that could lead to them not winning the nl central.

TheBabboMember since 2019
4 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

“Some of the blame can be placed on his back issues, but back issues can be quite difficult to resolve long-term.”

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  TheBabbo

Oops my bad

Dan B
4 years ago
Reply to  TheBabbo

Look at this guy, actually reading the articles here.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Back issues are frequently weight related….but with the case of Yelich it appears that isn’t the issue.

Matt
4 years ago

So this is why Kevin Appier’s name is at the top of the suggested player searches list. I was wondering if something happened.

I’ve always had a soft spot for Appier even as someone who was never a fan of any of the teams he played for. For whatever reason my enduring memory of him is trading for him in All-Star Baseball 2001 for the N64 because he graded out really well and was easy to acquire for some reason, pitching a perfect game into like the 7th inning with him, and then losing it because he broke his arm throwing a pitch and was out for like 6 months.

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt

In real baseball he was traded for a washed Mo Vaughn who missed most of not all the ‘01 season because Vaughn looked good in batting practice ahh stupid Steve Phillips really ran at tight ship.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago

Daniel Vogelbach seems like an inexpensive DH option in FA. Not great but cheap and acceptable.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Renato Nunez does as well.

David Klein
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Yeah but the Brewers nontendered him I could see them making a run at Cruz.

dl80Member since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Especially as just a platoon guy.

NATS FanMember since 2018
4 years ago

Kevin Appier’s peek is as good as almost anyone’s! remember that was the steroid time so he was amazing for his time.

Jason BMember since 2017
4 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Peek? He’s a real peeping Tom, that one!

marchandman34Member since 2020
4 years ago

Kevin Appier was overshadowed by many all-time greats, and had the miss fortune of timing some prime years during the strike, but Grape Ape not only had a memorable motion, but a HOF worthy career.

scottn1Member since 2019
4 years ago

Yelich’s dropoff just has to be either injury related. Nothing else really stands out as to why he went from near MVP* in 2019 to replacement level in 2021. It saddens me to see him struggle as he is one of my favorite players in 2018/19 to watch and I like his swing, despite him being on a division rival.

If you look at his stats nothing seems out of the ordinary other than in Statcast where his LA and Barrel% are dramatically down from 2019. But he put up 134 WRC+ in 2016 with same LA and close barrel% while in MIA.

Maybe Covid changes/fatigue/protocol has effected him. I also think he was one of the players outspoken against no video replay in dugouts in 2020?

OR maybe 2018/19 was just a product of the juiced ball those years as documented on this site and others. His ISO took a massive jump those two years of his career and he wasn’t openly acknowledging changing his swing to get more LA. In-fact I remember him always being a swing-down proponent even during those two years.

* What’s interesting is both the NL MVP running-up and winner (Bellinger) have had mirror career paths starting in 2019. Huge season and then slide to replacement level (Cody even beyond replacement!) due to any of the above reasons. Bellinger I expect to bounce back as he is younger but he puts up another season like last year and he could be headed to minor-leagues after winning MVP three seasons ago.

MichaelMember since 2017
4 years ago

I’m inordinately bullish on T.Taylor, so it was nice to see the Raul Ibanez comp. I think Taylor will have a big year. They need it.

ginaroyalsfan
4 years ago

With their solid pitching and bullpen, and generally playable position players, they resemble a more expensive older Rays squad. It should be easy for them to improve too, given their biggest needs are at the outfield corners and DH. If they want to spend big and go for it Castellanos would be a fine pickup, he can cover the corners and certainly DH. I’d love to see them come out of nowhere and sign Freeman, but that’s pretty much wishful thinking. A one-year deal for Nelson Cruz would work well, except I think they’d be served better by someone who can at least fake it in the field.

tommyjohnscurve
4 years ago

I love the element of how your system does the comps to historical players. I’m curious how that system crunches the numbers esp comp’ing Urias to Stillwell (no power) or Tyrone Taylor to Raul Ibanez (who had power but not much speed and I always thought the speed was TT gift to the lineup). Does it take everything including defensive metrics into consideration? Really love getting the chance to remember some of these other players through this process!

tommyjohnscurve
4 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Thanks for all of this info. I have a very skewed memory for Stillwell, lol. This is very helpful to be mindful of as I go through. Will definitely check out the link you included. Thanks again for all you do – it is great to have all this info when planning.

Kevbot034
4 years ago

It’s virtually inconsequential difference of 2.9 to 3.0 WAR, but how does Urias project above Adames with a neglible gap in his lead of OBP, but behind in slugging, while also projected for worse defense at a lower defensive projection?

Eephus PitchMember since 2016
4 years ago

Nice job with the team analyses. When can we look forward to ZIPS being added to the projections tables?